UNASSIGNED: Patients with lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) frequently require revascularization procedures. Currently used diagnostic methods are insufficient in predicting successful outcomes and focus on macrovascular rather than microvascular state. Several promising modalities to increase diagnostic accuracy are emerging, including maximal systolic acceleration (ACCmax), measured by duplex ultrasound (DUS). For the assessment of tissue perfusion, near-infrared fluorescence (NIR) imaging using indocyanine green (ICG) demonstrates promising results. This study aims to identify the usefulness of combining these two methods for macrovascular and microvascular perfusion assessment to predict successful clinical outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective study was performed collecting preinterventional and postinterventional DUS and ICG NIR fluorescence imaging measurements from LEAD patients undergoing revascularization. The correlation between the preinterventional and postinterventional perfusion parameters, described as the delta (Δ) ACCmax and ΔICG NIR fluorescence parameters, were analyzed. Improvements in perfusion parameters were compared to clinical outcomes, defined as improvement in pain-free walking distance, freedom from rest pain, or tendency toward wound and ulcer healing.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 38 patients (42 limbs) were included. ACCmax and ICG NIR fluorescence perfusion parameters improved significantly after revascularization (p<0.001). Patients with a poor clinical outcome had a significantly lower improvement of both parameters after revascularization (p<0.001-0.016). Lack of correlation was found between the delta of ACCmax and ICG NIR fluorescence imaging. Multiple non-congruent improvements of macrovascular parameters (ACCmax) and perfusion (ICG NIR fluorescence) were seen within patients. However, for all patients with a successful clinical outcome, at least one parameter improved.
UNASSIGNED: Combining ACCmax and ICG NIR fluorescence imaging revealed improvement in at least one parameter within all patients with a successful clinical outcome. This study highlights the potential of assessing both the macrovascular state and tissue perfusion following lower extremity revascularization, as both appear to reflect different aspects of vascularization.
CONCLUSIONS: Numerous techniques have been developed to assess tissue perfusion to predict clinical outcomes following revascularization in patients with peripheral artery disease. However, none are widely implemented in clinical practice. This study emphasized the importance of employing multiple modalities from different perspectives for more accurate prediction. By focusing on both the macrovascular state and tissue perfusion, clinicians can better guide themselves in their treatment strategies.

暂无摘要。

UNASSIGNED: This is a prospective study to investigate the clinical outcomes of using noncompliant balloons in lower limb angioplasty for chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI).
UNASSIGNED: This is a prospective single-center cohort study performed at a local tertiary hospital in Singapore. Consecutive patients who underwent lower limb angioplasty for CLTI using a noncompliant balloon catheter were enrolled if they were aged 40 years and above, presented with CLTI Rutherford grade 4 to 6, and had TASC C or D lesions in the lower limb vessels that were at least 100mm in length. Patient demographics, Rutherford grading, lesion characteristics, complications, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. The primary outcomes were 30-day freedom from major adverse events, amputation-free survival (AFS) at 12 months, and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (cdTLR) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included clinical success and target lesion primary patency (TLPP) at 12 months. Amputation-free survival, freedom from cdTLR, and TLPP were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.
UNASSIGNED: From May 2020 to December 2021, 50 patients (50 limbs) were enrolled. 43 (86%) patients had diabetes mellitus, while 12 patients (24%) had end-stage renal failure. 85 lesions were treated, including 59 (69.4%) below-the-knee (BTK) lesions. All the lesions were TASC C (n=45, 52.9%) or TASC D (n=40, 47.1%) lesions. Mean lesion length was 231.4±116.2mm. Technical success rate was 96.5%. No patients were lost to follow-up. Median follow-up duration was 282 days (IQR: 31-390 days). One patient died on day 26 due to an acute myocardial infarction. Two patients had groin hematomas postprocedure, both of which were treated conservatively. AFS, freedom from cdTLR, and TLPP at 12 months postprocedure was 70.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.4%-83.9%), 90.1% (95% CI: 83.4%-97.4%), and 61.1% (95% CI: 50.7%-73.6%), respectively.
UNASSIGNED: Early results have shown that the use of a high-pressure, noncompliant balloon is effective in lower limb angioplasty for CLTI in a highly challenging group of patients with a high prevalence of long BTK disease. Good vessel patency and limb salvage rates can be achieved, with a low complication rate. We await more long-term outcomes on vessel patency.
CONCLUSIONS: There are many devices in the market for use in lower limb angioplasty. However, many of them come with an increased financial cost, procedural time and procedural difficulty. We report our prospective results with the exclusive use of a high pressure, non-compliant balloon, in a challening group of patients with a high prevalence of diabetes and end stage renal failure, achieving amputation free surival at 6 and 12 months post-procedure of 84.0% and 70.0% respectively. The use of non-compliant balloon is technically easy and does not add additional steps compared to a standard POBA procedure, thus limiting costs. We believe this article can be a push factor for clinicians to consider the use of these high pressure, non-compliant balloons in their patient care.

UNASSIGNED: Although endovascular therapy (EVT) is considered a vital strategy for treating infrapopliteal lesions in chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), the recurrence rate after EVT exceeds that after bypass surgery (BSX). The optimal approach for managing infrapopliteal lesion recurrence in patients with CLTI and unhealed ulcers remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes of repeat EVT and subsequent inframalleolar BSX for CLTI with infrapopliteal lesion recurrence.
UNASSIGNED: We conducted a retrospective analysis of 140 patients with CLTI (mean age, 70±10 years; male, 71.4%; diabetes mellitus, 73.6%; dialysis, 74.3%; Rutherford 5, 79.3%; and Rutherford 6, 20.7%) who had an unhealed wound due to the recurrence of infrapopliteal lesions between January 2015 and May 2020. We compared the clinical outcomes of 40 patients who underwent the subsequent inframalleolar BSX with those of 100 patients who underwent repeat EVT. The outcome measures were amputation-free survival (AFS) and wound healing rate. Propensity score matching analysis was conducted to minimize differences in baseline characteristics.
UNASSIGNED: Propensity score matching extracted 38 pairs (38 patients in the subsequent BSX group and 83 patients in the repeat EVT group). AFS was not significantly different between the repeat EVT and subsequent BSX groups (81.9% vs 82.6% at 1 year, p=0.97). Neither was cumulative wound healing (42.8% vs 43.3% at 1 year, p=0.55). No baseline characteristics had any significant interaction effect on the association between repeat EVT, subsequent BSX, and failure of AFS.
UNASSIGNED: This study using propensity score matching revealed that the clinical outcomes following repeat EVT were comparable with those following subsequent inframalleolar BSX, indicating that repeat EVT may be a viable treatment option for CLTI with infrapopliteal lesion recurrence.
CONCLUSIONS: Although endovascular therapy (EVT) has expanded the treatment options for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI), the recurrence rate after EVT is higher than that after bypass surgery (BSX). This retrospective study compared the clinical outcomes of repeat EVT with those of subsequent BSX for CLTI with infrapopliteal lesion recurrence. After propensity score matching, amputation-free survival (AFS) was not significantly different between the repeat EVT and subsequent BSX groups (81.9% vs 82.6% at 1 year, p=0.97). Neither was cumulative wound healing (42.8% vs 43.3% at 1 year, p=0.55). There was no difference between the 2 revascularization strategies when treating infrapopliteal restenosis lesions.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the therapeutic potential of fetal progenitor cells (FPCs) in the treatment of chronic non-healing wounds and ulcers associated with chronic limb ischemia (CLI). The research aimed to elucidate the mechanism of action of FPCs and evaluate their efficacy and safety in CLI patients.
METHODS: The researchers isolated FPCs from aborted human fetal liver, brain, and skin tissues and thoroughly characterized them. The preclinical phase of the study involved assessing the effects of FPCs in a rat model of CLI. Subsequently, a randomized controlled clinical trial was conducted to compare the efficacy of FPCs with standard treatment and autologous bone marrow mononuclear cells in CLI patients. The clinical trial lasted 12 months, with a follow-up period of 24-36 months. The primary outcomes included wound healing, frequency of major and minor amputations, pain reduction, and the incidence of complications. Secondary outcomes involved changes in local hemodynamics and histological, ultrastructural, and immunohistochemical assessments of angiogenesis.
RESULTS: In the animal model, FPC treatment significantly enhanced angiogenesis and accelerated healing of ischemic wounds compared to controls. The clinical trial in CLI patients demonstrated that the FPC therapy achieved substantially higher rates of complete wound closure, prevention of major amputation, pain reduction, and improvement in ankle-brachial index compared to control groups. Notably, the study reported no serious adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: FPC therapy exhibited remarkable efficacy in promoting the healing of ischemic wounds, preventing amputation, and improving symptoms and quality of life in patients with CLI. The proangiogenic and provasculogenic effects of FPCs may be attributed to their ability to secrete specific growth factors. These findings provide new insights into the development of cellular therapeutic angiogenesis as a promising approach for the treatment of peripheral arterial diseases.

Deep venous arterialization (DVA) is a final option for limb salvage in patients with end stage arterial anatomy. We report a 66-year-old dialysis dependent male with forefoot gangrene, Rutherford class 6 chronic limb ischemia, who required a redo endovascular DVA. On initial presentation an angiogram was demonstrated a desert foot with absent tibial runoff to his bilateral lower extremities. After discussion, patient elected to trial DVA in hope of avoiding a major amputation. A hybrid DVA was performed using a Pioneer Plus and .018″ Viabahn stents from the peroneal artery into the peroneal venous system; following this, the peroneal vein was anastomosed to the lesser saphenous vein via an open posterior approach at the ankle. 3 months later, a second DVA was performed by exposing the above knee popliteal artery and vein and creating an end-to-side anastomosis. Of note, the great saphenous vein was less than 2 mm in diameter and no arm vein was available due to history of prior fistulas in bilateral arms. Via the popliteal vein, the posterior tibial vein was selected and additional .018″ Viabahn stents were deployed from the malleolus to the P2 segment of the popliteal vein. Three months after the second hybrid DVA, the patient\'s forefoot had healed after split thickness skin grafting. Continued patency is noted of the re-do hybrid DVA with minimal calf edema. Newer creative strategies are required for \"No Option Chronic Limb Ischemia\" which is becoming more relevant in diabetic and dialysis dependent patients. This case illustrates the potential to convert a deep venous arterialization to a superficial venous arterialization for improved venous outflow and wound healing.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the 5-year real-world results of Supera stent implantation in below the knee prosthetic bypasses (BKPBs). All the procedures were performed because of a history of recurrent thrombosis of the graft and significant stenotic kinking of the prosthesis during knee flexion. A Supera stent was implanted to prevent the next potential BKPB thrombosis.
METHODS: Fourteen patients were included in this single-center, retrospective observational cohort study. All patients underwent Supera stent implantation in infrainguinal prosthetic bypass between 2012 and 2017, due to a history of recurrent thrombosis and kinking of the prosthetic bypass.
RESULTS: Prior to Supera stent implantation procedure, all the patients had more than one episode of acute limb ischemia caused by thrombosis of the BKPB. The median number of BKPB thromboses prior to Supera stent implantation was 3 and ranged from 2 to 6. Technical success was achieved in all cases. Primary patency rates at 12, 24, 36 and 60 months were 71.4%, 57.1%, 57.1% and 14.3%, respectively. Secondary patency rates at 12, 24, 36 and 60 months were 78.6%, 64.3%, 64.3% and 35.7%, respectively. One stent fracture was reported during 60-month follow-up. Major amputation was performed in 6 patients in 5-year follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Supera stent in treatment of recurrent thrombosis of BKBP is a safe procedure with acceptable mid-term results. However, larger and comparable prospective studies are needed for broader analysis of this procedure.

UNASSIGNED: The COVID-19 pandemic necessitated changes in processes of care, which significantly impacted surgical care. This study evaluated the impact of these changes on patient outcomes and costs for non-elective major lower extremity amputations (LEA).
UNASSIGNED: The 2019-2021 Florida Agency for Health Care Administration database was queried for adult patients who underwent non-elective major LEA. Per-patient inflation-adjusted costs were collected. Patient cohorts were established based on Florida COVID-19 mortality rates: COVID-heavy (CH) included nine months with the highest mortality, COVID-light (CL) included nine months with the lowest mortality, and pre-COVID (PC) included nine months before COVID (2019). Outcomes included in-hospital patient outcomes and hospitalization cost.
UNASSIGNED: 6132 patients were included (1957 PC, 2104 CH, and 2071 CL). Compared to PC, there was increased patient acuity at presentation, but morbidity (31%), mortality (4%), and length of stay (median 12 [8-17] days) were unchanged during CH and CL. Additionally, costs significantly increased during the pandemic; median total cost rose 9%, room costs increased by 16%, ICU costs rose by 15%, and operating room costs rose by 15%. When COVID-positive patients were excluded, cost of care was still significantly higher during CH and CL.
UNASSIGNED: Despite maintaining pre-pandemic standards, as evidenced by unchanged outcomes, the pandemic led to increased costs for patients undergoing non-elective major LEA. This was likely due to increased patient acuity, resource strain, and supply chain shortages during the pandemic.
UNASSIGNED: While patient outcomes for non-elective major lower extremity amputations remained consistent during the COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare costs significantly increased, likely due to increased patient acuity and heightened pressures on resources and supply chains. These findings underscore the need for informed policy changes to mitigate the financial impact on patients and healthcare systems for future public health emergencies.

BACKGROUND: Endovascular therapy offers an alternative for treating femoropopliteal (FP) and infrapopliteal (IP) lesions related to occlusive lower extremity artery disease. Despite numerous trials, the effectiveness of restenosis prevention using local drug delivery devices remains a topic of debate.
OBJECTIVE: An updated systematic review and network meta-analysis was conducted. Our overall aim was to summarize the most recent clinical evidence regarding endovascular approaches for FP and IP atherosclerotic lesions.
METHODS: We conducted a search for randomized trials in the MEDLINE database, and extracted data related to clinical endpoints. Our primary focus was on the rate of major adverse events (MAEs), including mortality, amputation, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). A multiple treatment network meta-analysis supplemented with component network analyses was performed to examine the impact of combined treatment.
RESULTS: Our search yielded 33 randomized controlled trials encompassing 5766 patients. This included 19 studies focused on femoropopliteal and 14 on IP lesions, accounting for 3565 and 2201 patients, respectively. Drug-coated balloons (DCBs) and drug-eluting stents (DESs) displayed a reduced MAE risk in comparison to plain old balloon angioplasty (POBA)-RR for DCB: 0.64 (95% CI: 0.52-0.77) and for DES: 0.71 (95% CI: 0.51-0.99). The bare-metal stent (BMS) group manifested the most substantial MAE risk, being 59% higher relative to the DCB cohort (BMS vs. DCB RR: 1.59; 95% CI: 1.03-2.47). For FP lesions, DES was the standout performer, curtailing MAE risk by 55% relative to POBA. Within IP lesions, DES mitigated the MAE risk by 25% versus POBA. DCB did not exhibit any notable MAE reduction when pitted against POBA.
CONCLUSIONS: In FP arteries, both DESs and DCBs yielded significantly diminished MAEs, thus outpacing other techniques. Regarding IP arteries, only DESs resulted in significantly fewer MAEs. In alignment with contemporary research, our findings revealed no signs of elevated mortality in patients undergoing treatment with drug-eluting apparatuses.

OBJECTIVE: There has been significant variability in practice patterns and equipoise regarding treatment approach for chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). We aimed to assess treatment preferences of Best Endovascular vs Best Surgical Therapy in Patients with CLTI (BEST-CLI) investigators prior to and following the trial.
METHODS: An electronic 60-question survey was sent to 1180 BEST-CLI investigators in 2022, after trial conclusion and before announcement of results. Investigators\' preferences were assessed across clinical scenarios for both open (OPEN) and endovascular (ENDO) revascularization strategies. Vascular surgeon (VS) surgical and ENDO preferences were compared with a 2010 survey administered to prospective investigators before trial funding.
RESULTS: For the 2022 survey, the response rate was 20.2% and was comprised of VSs (76.3%), interventional cardiologists (11.4%) and interventional radiologists (11.6%). The majority (72.6%) were in academic practice and 39.1% were in practice for >20 years. During initial CLTI work-up, 65.8%, 42.6%, and 55.9% of respondents always or usually ordered an arterial duplex, computed tomography angiography, and vein mapping, respectively. The most common practice distribution between ENDO and OPEN procedures was 70/30. Postoperatively, a majority reported performing routine duplex surveillance of vein bypass (99%), prosthetic bypass (81.9%), and ENDO interventions (86%). A minority reported always or usually using the wound, ischemia, and foot infection (WIfI) criteria (25.8%), GLASS (8.3%), and a risk calculator (14.8%). More than one-half (52.9%) agreed that the statement \"no bridges are burned with an ENDO-first approach\" was false. Intervention choice was influenced by availability of the operating room or ENDO suite, personal schedule, and personal skill set in 30.1%, 18.0%, and 45.9% of respondents, respectively. Most respondents reported routinely using paclitaxel-coated balloons (88.1%) and stents (67.5%); however, 73.3% altered practice when safety concerns were raised. Among surgeons, 17.8%, 2.9%, and 10.3% reported performing >10 annual alternative autogenous vein bypasses, composite vein composite vein bypasses, and bypasses to pedal targets, respectively. Among all interventionalists, 8%, 24%, and 8% reported performing >10 annual radial access procedures, pedal or tibial access procedures, and pedal loop revascularizations. The majority (89.1%) of respondents felt that CLTI teams improved care; however, only 23.2% had a defined team. The effectiveness of the teamwork at institutions was characterized as highly effective in 42.5%. When comparing responses by VSs to the 2010 survey, there were no changes in preferred treatment based on Inter-Society Consensus for the Management of Peripheral Arterial Disease (TASC) II classification or conduit preference. In 2022, OPEN surgery was preferred more for a popliteal occlusion. For clinical scenarios, there were no differences except a decreased proportion of respondents who felt there was equipoise for major tissue loss for major tissue loss (43.8% vs 31.2%) and increased ENDO choice for minor tissue loss (17.6% vs 30.8%) (P < .05).
CONCLUSIONS: There is a wide range of practice patterns among vascular specialists treating CLTI. The majority of investigators in BEST-CLI had experience in both advanced OPEN and ENDO techniques and represent a real-world sample of technical expertise. Over the course of the decade of the BEST-CLI trial, there was overall similar equipoise among VSs.