OBJECTIVE: Management of low-grade (LG) urothelium-confined (Ta stage) non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) poses a distinct therapeutic challenge. Transurethral resection of bladder tumor (TURBT), the standard treatment, frequently has to be repeated because of high tumor recurrence rates. This places a considerable strain on both patients and health care infrastructure, underscoring the need for alternative management approaches. Herein, the IBCG (International Bladder Cancer Group), conducted a review to explore the efficacy and safety of deintensified treatment strategies for recurrent LG Ta NMIBC.
METHODS: We conducted a collaborative review of relevant literature in the PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Our focus was on high-quality evidence, including randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses. We also reviewed guidelines published by prominent urological associations.
UNASSIGNED: Active surveillance, chemoablation, and office fulguration are valid treatment options for recurrent LG Ta NMIBC. These deintensified approaches offer several advantages over TURBT: lower complication rates, less morbidity, lower health care costs, and better quality of life for patients. Importantly, these benefits are achieved without compromising oncological safety.
CONCLUSIONS: Our review demonstrates that less intensive treatment strategies for recurrent LG Ta NMIBC are both feasible and valuable. The IBCG recommends use of these approaches for carefully selected patients to help lower health care costs and enhance patients\' quality of life.
RESULTS: We reviewed studies on less invasive management options for low-grade noninvasive bladder cancer, including active surveillance, chemical ablation, and heat treatment. Recent results confirm that these less intense treatment options can reduce the treatment burden and costs for patients and preserve their quality of life without negatively affecting cancer control outcomes.

UNASSIGNED: Endoscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is increasingly relevant with greater detection of low-grade disease and guidelines recommending kidney preservation for low-risk disease. Historically, laser or thermal ablation has served as the primary tool for endoscopic management of UTUC, however, chemoablation is rapidly being developed to serve as a primary or adjuvant treatment option, which warrants review.
UNASSIGNED: The current literature was reviewed to compare the outcomes and clinical utility of endoscopic treatment modalities for low-grade UTUC, with a focus on mitomycin-containing reverse thermal gel (UGN-101).
UNASSIGNED: The overall outcomes of mitomycin-containing gel therapy are promising, but adverse effects such as ureteral stricture call for careful consideration when using this treatment. We believe it is reasonable to consider use of mitomycin-containing gel as an adjuvant chemotherapy with endoscopic laser resection of low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma.

暂无摘要。

Localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a difficult disease for clinicians to treat, due to the multitude of oncological and patient factors to consider. Despite the challenges of diagnostic staging, endoscopic management, and disease recurrence, there is still a need for local therapeutic options that do not subject patients to the morbidities of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Intraluminal chemotherapies have allowed for improved oncological control in patients with low-grade disease receiving renal-sparing treatment approaches. This narrative review discusses the treatment modalities available for localized low-grade UTUC, with a focus on the current status of chemoablation. The OLYMPUS trial was a pivotal study that lead to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of UGN-101 (mitomycin-C) in April 2020 for the treatment of low-grade UTUC, and intraluminal chemotherapy is now a widely used modality for managing this disease. The trial reported a complete response (CR) rate of 59%, and an estimated treatment durability of 82% at 1 year. However, a concern was the reported 44% ureteral stricture rate using the retrograde approach. More research is currently underway to determine the ideal instillation method for intraluminal therapies (e.g., retrograde vs. antegrade). Lastly, we discuss upcoming treatment options. Newer novel agents like padeliporfin vascular targeted photodynamic (VTP) therapy (brand name TOOKAD) are currently being studied, which will in hope provide additional treatment options for UTUC patients.

UGN-101 has been approved for the chemoablation of low-grade upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) involving the renal pelvis and calyces. Herein is the first reported cohort of patients with ureteral tumors treated with UGN-101.
We performed a retrospective review of patients treated with UGN-101 for UTUC at 15 high-volume academic and community centers focusing on outcomes of patients treated for ureteral disease. Patients received UGN-101 with either adjuvant or chemo-ablative intent. Response rates are reported for patients receiving chemo-ablative intent. Adverse outcomes were characterized with a focus on the rate of ureteral stenosis.
In a cohort of 132 patients and 136 renal units, 47 cases had tumor involvement of the ureter, with 12 cases of ureteral tumor only (8.8%) and 35 cases of ureteral plus renal pelvic tumors (25.7%). Of the 23 patients with ureteral involvement who received UGN-101 induction with chemo-ablative intent, the complete response was 47.8%, which did not differ significantly from outcomes in patients without ureteral involvement. Fourteen patients (37.8%) with ureteral tumors had significant ureteral stenosis at first post-treatment evaluation, however, when excluding those with pre-existing hydronephrosis or ureteral stenosis, only 5.4% of patients developed new clinically significant stenosis.
UGN-101 appears to be safe and may have similar efficacy in treating low-grade urothelial carcinoma of the ureter as compared to renal pelvic tumors.

UGN-101 can be used for chemoablation of low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). The gel can be administered via a retrograde route through a ureteral catheter or an antegrade route via a nephrostomy tube.
To report outcomes of UGN-101 by route of administration.
We performed a retrospective review of 132 patients from 15 institutions who were treated with UGN-101 for low-grade UTUC via retrograde versus antegrade administration.
Survival outcomes are reported per patient. Treatment, complications, and recurrence outcomes are reported per renal unit. Statistical analysis was performed for primary endpoints of oncological response and ureteral stricture occurrence.
A total of 136 renal units were evaluated, comprising 78 retrograde and 58 antegrade instillations. Median follow-up was 7.4 mo. There were 120 cases (91%) of biopsy-proven low-grade UTUC. Tumors were in the renal pelvis alone in 89 cases (65%), in the ureter alone in 12 cases (9%), and in both in 35 cases (26%). Seventy-six patients (56%) had residual disease before UGN-101 treatment. Chemoablation with UGN-101 was used in 50/78 (64%) retrograde cases and 26/58 (45%) antegrade cases. A complete response according to inspection and cytology was achieved in 31 (48%) retrograde and 30 (60%) antegrade renal units (p = 0.1). Clavien grade 3 ureteral stricture occurred in 21 retrograde cases (32%) and only six (12%) antegrade cases (p < 0.01). Limitations include treatment bias, as patients in the antegrade group were more likely to undergo endoscopic mechanical ablation before UGN-101 instillation.
These preliminary results show a significantly lower rate of stricture occurrence with antegrade administration of UGN-101, with no apparent impact on oncological efficacy.
We compared results for two different delivery routes for the drug UGN-101 for treatment of cancer in the upper urinary tract. For the antegrade route, a tube is inserted through the skin into the kidney. For the retrograde route, a catheter is inserted past the bladder into the upper urinary tract. Our results show a lower rate of narrowing of the ureter (the tube draining urine from the kidney into the bladder) using the antegrade route, with no difference in cancer control.

Chemical ablation was designed to inject chemical agents directly into solid tumors to kill cells and is currently only used clinically for the palliative treatment of tumors. The application and combination of different drugs, from anhydrous ethanol, and glacial acetic acid to epi-amycin, have been clinically tested for a long time. The effectiveness is unsatisfactory due to chemical agents\' poor diffusion and concentration. Immunotherapy is considered a prospective oncologic therapeutic. Still, the clinical applications were limited by the low response rate of patients to immune drugs and the immune-related adverse effects caused by high doses. The advent of intratumoral immunotherapy has well addressed these issues. However, the efficacy of intratumoral immunotherapy alone is uncertain, as suggested by the results of preclinical and clinical studies. In this study, we will focus on the research of immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment with chemoablation and intratumoral immunotherapy, the synergistic effect between chemotherapeutic drugs and immunotherapy. We propose a new concept of intratumoral chemo-immunoablation. The concept opens a new perspective for tumor treatment from direct killing of tumor cells while, enhancing systemic anti-tumor immune response, and significantly reducing adverse effects of drugs.

Although intratumoral chemoablation can obtain an impressive therapeutic effect, there is still incomplete ablation and tumor recurrence in some patients. This could be due to the short retention time of the drug in the tumor, the limited distribution of intratumoral drugs, and, beyond that, the immunotolerance caused by the tumor microenvironment (TME). There is still an urgent need to find an optimal drug sustained-release carrier and figure out the impact of regional injection to TME.
In this study, we supposed to use polyethylene glycol (PEG) hydrogel as a drug carrier to improve the retention time of the drug to extend the exposure of tumor cells and investigate the feasibility of combination local Epirubicin injection with anti-PD-L1.
The results revealed obvious tumor suppression based on the tumor volume and the inhibition time of tumor growth in the A549 lung cancer mouse model after local injection. Furthermore, the enhanced antitumor effects of the combination of systematic anti- programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) therapy with local chemoablation (EPI-GEL/PD-L1) for abscopal tumor reduction in the 4T1 breast model were also observed. Flow cytometry analysis of the tumor and blood samples showed significant variations in the proportions of PD-L1+ and CD3+CD8+PD-1+ cells before and after anti-PD-L1 therapy. On day 4 after local injection of the EPI gel, the expression of PD-L1 in abscopal tumors was upregulated, while the expression of PD-L1 in bilateral tumors in mice was significantly reduced after anti-PD-L1 treatment. The proportion of CD3+CD8+PD-1+ cells in the tumor and circulating blood in the EPI-GEL/PD-L1 group was decreased compared with that in the EPI-GEL (single injection of epirubicin) group.
The combination of local injection of the chemoablation agent with anti-PD-L1 monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy may strengthen the antitumor activity, and the use of PEG hydrogel as the drug carrier can extend the retention time of the chemoablation agent around the tumor, maintaining a long-term tumor-killing activity.

BACKGROUND: The ablative effect of intravesical therapy is known for decades. However, the clinical feasibility and efficacy of chemoablation for non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) have not become accepted.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the treatment outcomes of chemoablation for NMIBC and to compare its safety with that of the standard treatment, transurethral resection of bladder tumors (TURBT) followed by intravesical therapy.
METHODS: Multiple databases were queried in July 2022 for studies investigating the complete response (CR) rates and adverse events in NMIBC patients treated with chemoablation using mitomycin C (MMC), gemcitabine, epirubicin, or bacillus Calmette-Guérin.
RESULTS: Overall, 23 studies comprising 1199 patients were eligible for this meta-analysis. Among these studies, 20 assessed the efficacy of chemoablation and three compared the treatment outcomes of MMC chemoablation versus standard treatment. Among patients treated with weekly administration of any agent, the pooled CR rates at initial assessment were 50.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 45.9-55.9) for the marker lesion and 47.5% (95% CI: 36.5-58.7) for well-selected NMIBC (ie, small tumors and/or a small number of tumors). Novel regimens for chemoablation such as MMC-gel (70.6%, 95% CI: 60.1-79.3) and an intensive MMC regimen (64.7%, 95% CI: 56.2-72.3) provided better CR rates in well-selected NMIBC patients. Comparable CR rates were noted irrespective of tumor multiplicity, whereas tumor size <5 mm was associated with a higher CR rate than tumor size ≥5 mm (odds ratio: 0.36, 95% CI: 0.17-0.79). The novel intensive MMC regimen resulted in lower rates of dysuria and urinary frequency than standard treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the lack of long-term outcomes, chemoablation appears to be a promising treatment option for well-selected NMIBC patients and can potentially help avoid unnecessary TURBT, specifically in some elderly patients with intermediate-risk NMIBC. Further well-designed studies with larger cohorts are necessary to address the differential tolerability and long-term anticancer efficacy of this resurging approach.
RESULTS: Bladder instillation therapy has a potential ablative effect for well-selected non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. This can lead to the omission of an unnecessary surgical treatment.

UGN-101 is a novel delivery system for intracavitary treatment of upper tract urothelial cancer (UTUC). UGN-101 was approved based on a pivotal trial for small volume residual low-grade UTUC. Our aim was to report our experience with UGN-101 in a more heterogenous and real-world setting.
We performed a retrospective review of all UGN-101 cases from 15 institutions with a focus on practice patterns, efficacy, and adverse effects. We include UGN-101 utilization in both the chemoablative and adjuvant setting.
There were a total 136 renal units treated from 132 patients. The majority of cases were biopsy proven low-grade UTUC. Practice patterns varied considerably - the most common administration technique was antegrade instillation via a percutaneous nephrostomy. When utilized in the adjuvant setting, 69% of patients were disease free at the time of their first endoscopic evaluation, while in the chemoablative setting, 37% were endoscopically clear on the first evaluation (P < 0.001). Complete response was higher in patients with smaller tumor size prior to UGN-101 induction; low volume (<1 cm) residual disease was associated with a 70% complete response, similar to disease free rate at first endoscopic evaluation when UGN-101 was used in the adjuvant setting. The use of maintenance doses of UGN-101 was reported in 27% of cases. The overall incidence of new onset, clinically significant ureteral stenosis was 23%.
This study represents the largest review of patients treated with UGN-101 and can serve as a basis of ongoing hypotheses regarding treatment with UGN-101 for UTUC.