Chargemaster prices

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社会风险因素是美国支出地域差异的主要驱动因素,但鲜为人知的是社区层面的社会风险因素与医院价格的关系。我们的目标是按价格类型描述区域医院报告价格与社会风险因素之间的关系(chargemaster,cash,商业,Medicare,和医疗补助)。
    方法:本横断面分析使用了2022年急诊综合医院最新提供的医院报告价格。价格为14项共同服务。价格为98%,工资指数调整后,按服务标准化,并汇总到医院服务区(HSA)。对于社会风险,我们在5个社会风险领域(社会经济地位;种族,种族,和文化;性别;社会关系;以及住宅和社区环境)。Spearman的相关性用于估计价格类型的中位数价格和社会风险之间的关联。
    结果:报告了2,386家急性综合医院的价格,占45%(3,436个中的1,502个)HSA。区域价格与其他社会风险因素之间的相关性因价格类型而异(范围:-0.19至0.31)。Chargemaster和现金价格与大多数社区特征(23中的10,43%)显着相关,其次是商业价格(8,35%)。医疗保险和医疗补助价格仅与1项指标显着相关(所有p<0.01)。所有价格类型均与未投保百分比显着相关(均p<0.01)。主管,cash,商业价格与西班牙裔居民的百分比呈正相关,英语水平有限的居民,和非公民(所有p<0.05)。
    结论:虽然价格和社会风险因素之间的区域相关性在所有价格中都很弱,chargemaster,cash,与两个公共付款人(Medicare和Medicaid)相比,商业价格更像是与社区层面的社会风险因素密切相关。主管,cash,在社会弱势社区,商业医院的价格似乎更高。需要进一步研究以阐明价格与社区社会风险因素之间的关系。
    BACKGROUND: Social risk factors are key drivers of the geographic variation in spending in the United States but little is known how community-level social risk factors are associated with hospital prices. Our objective was to describe the relationship between regional hospital-reported prices and social risk factors by price type (chargemaster, cash, commercial, Medicare, and Medicaid).
    METHODS: This cross-sectional analysis used newly available hospital-reported prices from acute general hospitals in 2022. The prices were for 14 common services. Prices were winsorized at 98%, wage index-adjusted, standardized by service, and aggregated to hospital service areas (HSAs). For social risk, we used 23 measures across 5 domains of social risk (socioeconomic position; race, ethnicity, and culture; gender; social relationships; and residential and community context). Spearman\'s correlation was used to estimate associations between median prices and social risk by price type.
    RESULTS: Prices were reported from 2,386 acute general hospitals in 45% (1,502 of 3,436) HSAs. Correlations between regional prices and other social risk factors varied by price type (range: -0.19 to 0.31). Chargemaster and cash prices were significantly correlated with the most community characteristics (10 of 23, 43%) followed by commercial prices (8, 35%). Medicare and Medicaid prices were only significantly correlated with 1 measure (all p < 0.01). All price types were significantly correlated with the percentage of uninsured (all p < 0.01). Chargemaster, cash, and commercial prices were positively correlated with percentage of Hispanic residents, residents with limited English proficiency, and non-citizens (all p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: While regional correlations between prices and social risk factors were weak across all prices, chargemaster, cash, and commercial prices were more like closely aligned with community-level social risk factors than the two public payers (Medicare and Medicaid). Chargemaster, cash, and commercial hospital prices appeared to be higher in socially disadvantaged communities. Further research is needed to clarify the relationship between prices and community social risk factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:Chargemaster价格是提供者和卫生系统为其在美国的每个医疗服务分配的标价。这些费用通常比扩展到拥有私人或公共保险的个人的费用高出几个数量级,然而,这些标价是向没有保险的病人全额收费的,使他们面临灾难性卫生支出(CHE)的风险增加。这项研究的目的是检查CHE跨保险状态的风险,糖尿病诊断和检查跨种族/民族的差距。
    方法:我们对2002-2017年医疗支出小组调查中具有全国代表性的成年患者队列进行了回顾性观察研究。使用逻辑回归模型,我们估计了跨保险状态的CHE风险,糖尿病诊断和探索跨种族/民族的差距。
    结果:我们完全调整的结果表明,与未投保的情况相比,未投保的CHE的相对几率为5.9(p<0.01),和1.1(p<0.01),用于诊断为糖尿病的患者(与没有糖尿病的患者相比)。我们注意到保险状态和糖尿病诊断之间的显著相互作用,诊断为糖尿病的未参保患者比没有糖尿病诊断的参保患者发生CHE的可能性高9.5倍(p<0.01)。就种族/族裔差异而言,我们发现,在没有保险的人中,非西班牙裔黑人为13%(p<0.05),西班牙裔14.2%(p<0.05),与非西班牙裔白人相比,更有可能经历CHE。在没有保险的糖尿病患者中,我们进一步发现,与非西班牙裔白人患者相比,西班牙裔患者患CHE的可能性为39.3%(p<0.05).
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,未投保的糖尿病患者CHE风险显著升高。进一步发现,在没有保险的种族/族裔少数群体中,这些风险不成比例地高。这表明CHE可能是结构性经济和健康差距长期存在的渠道。
    BACKGROUND: Chargemaster prices are the list prices that providers and health systems assign to each of their medical services in the US. These charges are often several factors of magnitude higher than those extended to individuals with either private or public insurance, however, these list prices are billed in full to uninsured patients, putting them at increased risk of catastrophic health expenditures (CHE). The objective of this study was to examine the risk of CHE across insurance status, diabetes diagnosis and to examine disparity gaps across race/ethnicity.
    METHODS: We perform a retrospective observational study on a nationally representative cohort of adult patients from the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey for the years 2002-2017. Using logistic regression models we estimate the risk of CHE across insurance status, diabetes diagnosis and explore disparity gaps across race/ethnicity.
    RESULTS: Our fully adjusted results show that the relative odds of having CHE if uninsured is 5.9 (p < 0.01) compared to if insured, and 1.1 (p < 0.01) for patients with a diabetes diagnosis (compared to those without one). We note significant interactions between insurance status and diabetes diagnosis, with uninsured patients with a diabetes diagnosis being 9.5 times (p < 0.01) more likely to experience CHE than insured patients without a diabetes diagnosis. In terms of racial/ethnic disparities, we find that among the uninsured, non-Hispanic blacks are 13% (p < 0.05), and Hispanics 14.2% (p < 0.05), more likely to experience CHE than non-Hispanic whites. Among uninsured patients with diabetes, we further find that Hispanic patients are 39.3% (p < 0.05) more likely to have CHE than non-Hispanic white patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings indicate that uninsured patients with diabetes are at significantly elevated risks for CHE. These risks are further found to be disproportionately higher among uninsured racial/ethnic minorities, suggesting that CHE may present a channel through which structural economic and health disparities are perpetuated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号