目的:颈椎病可能导致颈部矢状参数的改变,并引发全身矢状参数的代偿性改变。然而,目前缺乏对不同类型颈椎病引起的矢状参数变化和代偿性改变的比较研究。这项研究比较了神经根型颈椎病(CSR)患者的术前矢状比对序列,后纵韧带骨化(OPLL),以及非OPLL因素引起的脊髓型颈椎病(CSM)。
方法:256例患者(134例男性,122名妇女;平均年龄,56.9±9.5年)进行回顾性分析。两名具有丰富经验的脊柱外科医生通过侧面X射线测量了总共4096个影像组学特征。临床症状测量为日本骨科协会(JOA)评分,10秒内的手部动作次数,握力,视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分。使用参数变量的单向方差分析(ANOVA)比较正态分布数据,并使用χ2检验分析分类数据。
结果:在OPLL组中,C2-C7Cobb角大于CSR和CSM组(19.8±10.4°,13.3±10.3°,13.9±9.9°,分别,p<0.001)。此外,对于CSM和CSR组,C7-S1SVA测量值位于前部(19.7±58.4°,-6.3±34.3°和-26.3±32.9°,p<0.001)。此外,C7-S1SVA>50mm的个体数量明显多于CSM组(26/69,11/83,p<0.001).在CSR组中,与OPLL组相比,TPA显示出较小的值(8.8±8.5°,12.7±10.2°,p<0.001)。此外,与OPLL和CSM组相比,SSA相对较小(49.6±11.2°,54.2±10.8°和54.3±9.3°,p<0.05)。
结论:OPLL患者表现出比CSR和CSM患者更大的宫颈前凸。然而,与CSM组相比,OPLL更有可能导致脊髓失衡。此外,与CSR患者相比,OPLL和CSM患者表现出前躯干倾斜和整体脊柱矢状参数较差。
OBJECTIVE: Cervical spondylosis may lead to changes in the sagittal parameters of the neck and trigger compensatory alterations in systemic sagittal parameters. However, there is currently a dearth of comparative research on the changes and compensatory alterations to sagittal parameters resulting from different types of cervical spondylosis. This study compared the preoperative sagittal alignment sequences among patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR), ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL), and cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) caused by factors resulting from non-OPLL factors.
METHODS: Full length lateral X-ray of the spine and cervical computed tomography (CT) of 256 patients (134 men, 122 women; mean age, 56.9 ± 9.5 years) were analyzed retrospectively. A total of 4096 radiomics features were measured through the lateral X-ray by two spinal surgeons with extensive experience. The clinical symptoms measures were the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, number of hand actions in 10 s, hand-grip strength, visual analog scale (VAS) score. Normally distributed data was compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) for parametric variables and χ2 test were used to analyze the categorical data.
RESULTS: In the OPLL group, the C2-C7 Cobb angle was greater than in the CSR and CSM groups (19.8 ± 10.4°, 13.3 ± 10.3°, and 13.9 ± 9.9°, respectively, p < 0.001). Additionally, the C7-S1 SVA measure was found to be situated in the anterior portion with regards to the CSM and CSR groups (19.7 ± 58.4°, -6.3 ± 34.3° and -26.3 ± 32.9°, p < 0.001). Moreover, the number of individuals with C7-S1 SVA >50 mm was significantly larger than the CSM group (26/69, 11/83, p < 0.001). In the CSR group, the TPA demonstrated smaller values compared to the OPLL group (8.8 ± 8.5°, 12.7 ± 10.2°, p < 0.001). Furthermore, the SSA was comparatively smaller as opposed to both the OPLL and CSM groups (49.6 ± 11.2°, 54.2 ± 10.8° and 54.3 ± 9.3°, p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with OPLL exhibit greater cervical lordosis than those with CSR and CSM. However, OPLL is more likely to result in spinal imbalance when compared to the CSM group. Furthermore, OPLL and CSM patients exhibit anterior trunk inclination and worse global spine sagittal parameters in comparison to CSR patients.