Cervical

宫颈
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    一些研究比较了基于技术的腰椎硬膜外类固醇注射(ESI)的结果(经椎间孔(TF)与层间(IL)与尾)。然而,关于这个主题的报道很少在颈椎中,结果相互矛盾。
    比较透视引导下宫颈TFESI与ILESI的成功率。
    回顾性,观察,在一个学术脊柱中心的门诊物理医学和康复诊所连续患者的体内研究。
    在2010年1月至2018年10月期间连续接受宫颈TF或ILESI的患者。
    ESI60天内的NRS疼痛评分。
    目前的程序术语(CPT)代码用于在2010年1月至2018年10月期间在接受宫颈TF或ILESI的单个门诊学术脊柱中心搜索所有连续患者。所有在注射后60天内注射前和注射后NRS疼痛评分的患者均纳入分析。
    共分析了178个TF和185个ILESI。成功定义为NRS疼痛评分改善≥50%。所有接受宫颈ESI的患者中有52%[95%CI:47-57%]取得了成功的结果。ILESI组有较好结果的强烈趋势,59%[95%CI:52-66%]的患者实现至少50%的疼痛缓解,而TF组则为46%[95%CI:39-53%]。与TF组(17%[95%CI:11-23%])相比,IL组中更高比例的患者获得至少80%的疼痛缓解(37%[95%CI:30-44%])。术后NRS疼痛评分中位数,与TFESI组相比,ILESI组的NRS疼痛评分中位数改善更好(p<0.001)。
    这项回顾性研究表明,与宫颈TFESI组相比,宫颈ILESI组的结果更好。
    UNASSIGNED: Several studies have compared outcomes from lumbar epidural steroid injections (ESIs) based upon technique (transforaminal (TF) vs interlaminar (IL) vs caudal). However, little on this topic has been reported in the cervical spine, and results have been conflicting.
    UNASSIGNED: To compare success rates of fluoroscopically-guided cervical TFESIs vs ILESIs.
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective, observational, in vivo study of consecutive patients at outpatient Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation clinics at a single academic spine center.
    UNASSIGNED: Consecutive patients who received a cervical TF or IL ESI between January 2010 and October 2018.
    UNASSIGNED: NRS pain scores within 60 days of the ESI.
    UNASSIGNED: Current procedural terminology (CPT) codes were used to search all consecutive patients at a single outpatient academic spine center who received a cervical TF or IL ESI between January 2010 October 2018. All patients with pre and post injection NRS pain scores within 60 days of the injection were included in the analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 178 ​TF and 185 ILESIs were analyzed. Success was defined as ≥ 50% improvement in NRS pain score. 52% [95% CI: 47 - 57%] of all patients receiving a cervical ESI achieved a successful outcome. There was a strong trend towards better results in the ILESI group with 59% [95% CI: 52 - 66%] of patients achieving at least 50% pain relief compared to 46% [95% CI: 39 - 53%] in the TF group. A higher proportion of patients in the IL group obtained at least 80% pain relief (37% [95% CI: 30 - 44%]) compared to those in the TF group (17% [95% CI: 11 - 23%]). Post-procedure median NRS pain scores, and improvement in median NRS pain scores were better in the ILESI group compared to the TFESI group (p<0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective study demonstrated better results in the cervical ILESI group compared to the cervical TFESI group.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    描述在先前进行颈椎前路椎间盘切除术并融合(ACDF)的患者中,颈椎硬膜外注射(CEI)的灾难性并发症。
    在最低程度的镇静下进行C7-T1的层间CEI。
    右偏瘫,弥漫性感觉障碍,手术后立即描述触觉异常性疼痛。CEI后24小时,MRI显示从C3-T3延伸的脊髓中T2信号增加,T1信号减少.术后ACDF改变,颈交叉韧带异常,来自连续CEI的重复性微创伤,硬膜外腔的损害可能会使抵抗技术的丧失复杂化,并增加硬脑膜穿刺和内在脊髓损伤的风险。
    颈椎解剖学知识,ACDF的生物力学意义,韧带炎症,术前影像回顾,和围手术期患者反馈是有价值的见解,可以减轻严重不良事件的风险.
    UNASSIGNED: Describe a catastrophic complication of cervical epidural injection (CEI) in a patient with prior anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF).
    UNASSIGNED: Interlaminar CEI at C7-T1 was performed under minimal sedation.
    UNASSIGNED: Right hemiparesis, diffuse dysesthesia, and tactile allodynia were immediately described after the procedure. 24 hours after CEI, an MRI showed an increased T2 signal and decreased T1 signal in the spinal cord extending from C3-T3. Postsurgical ACDF changes, cervicovertebral ligament anomalies, repetitive microtrauma from serial CEI\'s, and epidural space compromise may have complicated the loss of resistance technique and increased the risk for dural puncture and intrinsic cord injury.
    UNASSIGNED: Knowledge of cervical spinal anatomy, biomechanical implications of ACDF, ligamentous inflammation, pre-operative image review, and perioperative patient feedback are valuable insights that may mitigate the risk of severe adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经椎间孔硬膜外类固醇注射(CTFESI)通常用于治疗上肢神经根性疼痛。最近,已开发并验证了对传统技术的改进,该技术具有理论上的安全优势,即针接触脊髓神经和椎动脉的风险较小。新方法涉及在透视引导下的针轨迹,该轨迹直接基于MRI上特定的上关节过程角度测量。
    本研究的目的是评估非镇静患者人群中改良方法CTFESI手术的停药率。还进行了这项研究,以确认该程序在办公室环境中的安全性。
    对作者进行了回顾性审查(DL,SH)使用改进方法识别所有CTFESI的实践,在2018年10月至2021年1月期间,通过查询调查人员\(DL和SH)电子病历系统进行。确定了任何中断的CTFESI程序。终止的原因是通过病历审查确定的。此外,在CTFESI完成或中断期间或之后立即发生的任何重大神经系统或心血管事件均被确定.轻度血管迷走反应不被认为是明显的并发症。
    在研究期间使用改进的方法进行了总共973个CTFESI程序。十二个程序,1.2%(95%CI0.7-2.1%)停药。9例由于针头重新定位未解决的血管流动而中止。只有三个,0.3%(95%CI0.1-0.9)因患者不耐受而中止。没有明显的神经系统或心血管并发症。
    改良方法CTFESI的性能似乎在非常低的速率下具有良好的耐受性,0.3%,非镇静患者因不耐受而停药。神经或心血管并发症的发生率为零,这有助于目前有关该手术安全性的文献。
    UNASSIGNED: Cervical transforaminal epidural steroid injections (CTFESI) are commonly used in the treatment of upper extremity radicular pain. Recently, a modification of the conventional technique has been developed and validated which has a theoretical safety advantage of less risk of needle contact of the spinal nerve and vertebral artery. The new approach involves a needle trajectory under fluoroscopic guidance which is directly based upon the specific superior articular process angle measurement on MRI.
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the discontinuation rate of the modified approach CTFESI procedure in a non-sedated patient population. The study was also undertaken to confirm the safety of the procedure in an office-based setting.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective review was performed of the authors\' (DL, SH) practice to identify all CTFESI using the modified approach, performed between October 2018 through January 2021 through a query of the investigators\' (DL and SH) electronic medical record system. Any discontinued CTFESI procedure was identified. The reason for discontinuation was determined through medical record review. In addition, any significant neurologic or cardiovascular event occurring during or immediately following any completed or discontinued CTFESI was identified. Mild vasovagal reaction was not considered a significant complication.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 973 CTFESI procedures were performed using the modified approach during the study period. Twelve procedures, 1.2% (95% CI 0.7-2.1%) were discontinued. Nine were aborted due to vascular flow not resolved with needle repositioning. Only three, 0.3% (95% CI 0.1-0.9) were aborted due to patient intolerance. There were zero significant neurologic or cardiovascular complications.
    UNASSIGNED: The performance of the modified approach CTFESI appears to be well tolerated with a very low rate, 0.3%, of discontinuation due to intolerance in non-sedated patients. The zero incidence of neurologic or cardiovascular complication contributes to the current literature on the safety of this procedure.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    许多传统做法既有益又有害。传统有害做法,例如女性生殖器切割和传统的宫颈烧灼术,出于多种原因进行,但可能会产生负面的健康和社会影响。除了根深蒂固的信念,对这些做法的后果缺乏了解和认识,导致这些问题持续存在。这项研究的目的是检查传统的宫颈烧灼术是否与索马里的早产有关。这项前瞻性队列研究在我们医院进行了一年。本研究纳入了792例患者;这些患者被分为两组,烧灼和非烧灼组,比较两组妊娠结局。我们检查了传统的宫颈烧灼术是否与不良妊娠结局相关,包括早产。根据这项研究的结果,传统宫颈烧灼术在MSTREH患者中普遍存在(n=328,46.7%).子宫颈感染和不孕症是烧灼的两个主要适应症,44.8%,34.8%,分别。年纪大了,没有受过教育,和贫困与传统烧灼显著相关(P<0.001)。先前的传统宫颈烧灼术与早产风险之间存在显着相关性。与未烧灼的母亲相比,先前烧灼的妇女分娩早产胎儿的可能性是其两倍半(OR:2.64,95%CI2.15-3.33)。我们的发现表明,与未烧灼的妇女相比,以前进行过传统宫颈烧灼的妇女发生早产和不良妊娠结局的风险明显更高。卫生专业人员,特别是那些与社区关系密切的人,对于制定和实施消除索马里有害传统的计划至关重要。
    Numerous traditional practices are both beneficial and harmful. Traditional harmful practices, such as female genital mutilation and traditional cervical cauterization, are carried out for a number of reasons but can have negative health and social effects. In addition to deeply held beliefs, a lack of knowledge and awareness of the consequences of these practices contributes to the persistence of these issues. The objective of this study is to examine whether traditional cervical cauterizations were associated with preterm births in Somalia. This prospective cohort study was conducted at our hospital over a one-year period. Seven hundred and two patients were included in this study; these patients were divided into two groups, cauterized and non-cauterized groups, and the two groups were compared on pregnancy outcomes. We examined whether traditional cervical cauterizations were associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, including preterm births. According to the findings of this study, traditional cervical cauterization was prevalent among patients visiting MSTREH (n = 328, 46.7%). Infections of the uterine cervix and infertility were the two main indications for cauterization, 44.8%, and 34.8%, respectively.Being older, uneducated, and poverty were significantly associated with traditional cauterization (P < 0.001). There was a significant correlation between prior traditional cervical cauterization and the risk of preterm births. Women with prior cauterization were two and half times more likely to deliver a preterm fetus (OR: 2.64, 95% CI 2.15-3.33) compared to non-cauterized mothers. Our findings show that women who have previously undergone traditional cervical cauterization have a significantly higher risk of preterm birth and negative pregnancy outcomes than non-cauterized women. Health professionals, particularly those who are close to the community, are crucial in developing and putting into practice plans to end harmful traditions in Somalia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:椎旁肌脂肪浸润对颈椎退行性疾病的影响已被多项研究证实。然而,对急性颈脊髓损伤(SCI)患者椎旁伸肌的脂肪浸润知之甚少。本研究旨在探讨急性颈性脊髓损伤患者与健康对照组之间椎旁伸肌脂肪浸润的差异。并进一步探讨椎旁伸肌对颈椎SCI患者的保护作用。
    方法:对2019年1月至2023年11月急诊科收治的50例急性颈性脊髓损伤患者进行回顾性分析。包括26名男性和24名女性,平均年龄59.60±10.81岁。还包括50名健康中老年人的对照组,包括28名男性和22名女性,平均年龄55.00±8.21岁。颈椎磁共振成像(MRI)用于测量颈浅和深伸肌的横截面积,相应的椎体横截面积,以及使用ImageJ软件在浅表和深伸肌群内的脂肪区域。比较两组之间的差异,并根据脊髓损伤的严重程度和性别差异对颈椎SCI患者进行进一步分析。
    结果:宫颈SCI组C4-C7处深层脂肪浸润率(DFIR)和浅表脂肪浸润率(SFIR)明显高于对照组(P<0.001)。颈SCI组C5、C6水平的功能性深伸肌区域(FDEA)相对于椎体区域(VBA)的横截面积和功能性浅伸肌区域(FSEA)相对于VBA的横截面积明显低于对照组(分别P<0.001、P<0.001、P=0.034、P=0.004)。在宫颈SCI患者中,男性的深伸肌区(DEA)和浅伸肌区(SEA)的横截面积明显高于女性(P<0.001)。在C6和C7水平,男性组FDEA/VBA和FSEA/VBA比值高于女性组(P=0.009,P=0.022,P=0.019,P=0.005)。
    结论:与健康对照组相比,急性颈SCI患者表现出更高的脂肪浸润和更大程度的椎旁伸肌变性。这一发现强调了椎旁伸肌在颈椎SCI中的重要性,并可能指导未来的治疗策略。
    BACKGROUND: The effect of fat infiltration in the paraspinal muscles on cervical degenerative disease has been confirmed by multiple studies. However, little is known about fat infiltration in the paraspinal extensors in patients with acute cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). This study aimed to investigate the difference in paraspinal extensor fatty infiltration between patients with acute cervical SCI and healthy controls, and to further explore the protective role of the paravertebral extensor muscles in patients with cervical SCI.
    METHODS: A total of 50 patients with acute cervical SCI admitted to the emergency department from January 2019 to November 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, including 26 males and 24 females, with an average age of 59.60 ± 10.81 years. A control group of 50 healthy middle-aged and elderly individuals was also included, comprising 28 males and 22 females, with an average age of 55.00 ± 8.21 years. Cervical spine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was used to measure the cross-sectional areas of the superficial and deep cervical extensor muscles, the corresponding vertebral body cross-sectional areas, and the fat area within the superficial and deep extensor muscle groups using Image J software. Differences between the two groups were compared, and the cervical SCI patients were further analyzed based on the severity of the spinal cord injury and gender differences.
    RESULTS: The deep fatty infiltration ratio (DFIR) and superficial fatty infiltration ratio (SFIR) at C4-C7 in the cervical SCI group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < 0.001). The cross-sectional area of the functional deep extensor area (FDEA) relative to the vertebral body area (VBA) and the cross-sectional area of the functional superficial extensor area (FSEA) relative to the VBA at the C5 and C6 levels in the cervical SCI group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.034, P = 0.004 respectively). Among the cervical SCI patients, the cross-sectional areas of the deep extensor area (DEA) and the superficial extensor area (SEA) in males were significantly higher than those in females (P < 0.001). At the C6 and C7 levels, the FDEA/VBA and FSEA/VBA ratios in the male group were higher than those in the female group (P = 0.009, P = 0.022, P = 0.019, P = 0.005, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with acute cervical SCI exhibit significantly higher fatty infiltration and a greater degree of paravertebral extensor muscle degeneration compared to healthy controls. This finding underscores the importance of the paravertebral extensor muscles in the context of cervical SCI and may guide future therapeutic strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    一只2岁的家养短毛猫,在发生道路交通事故后出现四轻尿。脊柱X线检查显示C2-C3颈椎半脱位,CT扫描证实了这一点。通过腹侧入路使用螺钉和聚甲基丙烯酸甲酯(PMMA)进行手术稳定。术后CT扫描显示正确的植入物定位和半脱位的良好减少。手术后,猫迅速恢复到神经正常状态。
    创伤引起的宫颈半脱位在猫中并不常见,但在鉴别诊断中应予以考虑。该报告描述了使用螺钉和PMMA对猫的C2-C3宫颈半脱位的手术治疗。这是猫手术治疗的颈下半脱位的首例报告。
    UNASSIGNED: A 2-year-old spayed female domestic shorthair cat presented with tetraparesis after being involved in a road traffic accident. Survey spine radiographs revealed a C2-C3 cervical subluxation, which was confirmed by a CT scan. Surgical stabilisation was performed using screws and polymethyl methacrylate (PMMA) via a ventral approach. A postoperative CT scan demonstrated correct implant positioning and good reduction of the subluxation. After surgery, the cat rapidly recovered to a neurologically normal status.
    UNASSIGNED: Trauma-induced cervical subluxation is an uncommon occurrence in cats but should be considered in the differential diagnosis. This report describes the surgical management of a C2-C3 cervical subluxation in a cat using screws and PMMA. This is the first case report of a surgically treated subaxial cervical subluxation in a cat.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    宫颈癌是全世界妇女的重大健康问题,人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)是主要原因。这项研究旨在评估沙特女性对HPV的认识和知识,确定他们的信息来源,并评估他们接受HPV疫苗的意图。从2023年1月至5月,对654名18至60岁的沙特女性进行了问卷调查。结果显示,60.85%的参与者听说过HPV,但只有8.25%的人接受了HPV疫苗接种.尽管疫苗接种率低,71.11%的受访者表示愿意接种疫苗。受教育程度是疫苗知晓率和接受度的重要预测因素。互联网和社交媒体是关于HPV的最普遍的信息来源。该研究强调需要对沙特女性进行有关HPV相关疾病和疫苗接种的额外教育。尽管HPV疫苗的接受度很高,知识的缺乏表明,有针对性的教育干预措施对于提高认识和促进疫苗接种的吸收是必要的。这些发现可以为公共卫生策略提供信息,通过改善HPV疫苗接种覆盖率和教育来减轻沙特阿拉伯的宫颈癌负担。
    Cervical cancer is a significant health concern for women worldwide, with human papillomavirus (HPV) being the primary cause. This study aimed to assess Saudi women\'s awareness and knowledge of HPV, determine their information sources, and evaluate their intention to receive the HPV vaccine. A questionnaire-based survey was conducted among 654 Saudi females aged 18 to 60 years from January to May 2023. The results revealed that 60.85% of the participants had heard about HPV, but only 8.25% had received the HPV vaccination. Despite the low vaccination rate, 71.11% of the respondents expressed willingness to receive the vaccine. Educational level was the significant predictor of the vaccine awareness and acceptance. The internet and social media were the most prevalent sources of information about HPV. The study highlights the need for additional education about HPV-related diseases and vaccination among Saudi women. Although there is a high level of HPV vaccine acceptance, the lack of knowledge suggests that targeted educational interventions are necessary to increase awareness and promote vaccination uptake. These findings can inform public health strategies to reduce the burden of cervical cancer in Saudi Arabia through improved HPV vaccination coverage and education.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:自2019年以来,我院一直采用长侧块螺钉(LLMS)技术进行颈椎后路融合术。在这项研究中,LLMS插入技术,偏差率,和插入扭矩已经被描述。此外,与LLMS相关的几个主要问题已经得到充分解决。
    方法:本研究包括2019年12月至2023年12月在我院接受LLMS手术的58例患者(男性43例,女性15例),并使用术后CT进行评估。评估参数包括每个椎骨段的螺钉长度,矢状部分的螺钉角度,螺钉头之间的距离,和并发症。
    结果:C3处的中值螺钉长度为23.0mm(22.0-24.0mm),螺钉角度为36.1°(31.6-41.8°),螺钉头之间的距离为13.8mm(11.6-17.2mm)。C4处的中间螺钉长度为22.0mm(21.0-24.0mm),螺钉角度为36.2°(28.7-40.7°),螺钉头之间的距离为15.9mm(13.0-19.0mm)。C5处的中间螺钉长度为21.0mm(20.0-22.0mm),螺钉角度为35.6°(28.0-39.7°),螺钉头之间的距离为17.6mm(15.1-20.4mm)。C6的中间螺钉长度为20.0mm(19.0-22.0mm),螺钉角度为29.2°(25.2-36.8°),螺钉头之间的距离为20.4mm(16.1-24.4mm)。
    结论:LLMS技术的主要限制是螺钉角度不足,插入长螺钉困难,减压不足,无法进行颈椎椎板成形术。然而,这些限制并未显著影响LLMS的效率.LLMS的并发症较少,并且可以插入比LMS更长的螺钉。
    BACKGROUND: Long lateral mass screw (LLMS) technique for posterior cervical fusion has been performed in our hospital since 2019. In this study, the LLMS insertion technique, deviation rate, and insertion torque have been described. Moreover, several major concerns associated with LLMS have been adequately addressed.
    METHODS: This study included 58 patients (43 men and 15 women) who had undergone LLMS surgery at our hospital during the four-year period from December 2019 to December 2023, and were evaluated using postoperative CT. The evaluation parameters included the screw length at each vertebral segment, screw angle in the sagittal section, distance between the screw heads, and complications.
    RESULTS: The median screw length at C3 was 23.0 mm (22.0-24.0 mm), the screw angle was 36.1° (31.6-41.8°), and the distance between screw heads was 13.8 mm (11.6-17.2 mm). The median screw length at C4 was 22.0 mm (21.0-24.0 mm), the screw angle was 36.2° (28.7-40.7°), and the distance between screw heads was 15.9 mm (13.0-19.0 mm). The median screw length at C5 was 21.0 mm (20.0-22.0 mm), the screw angle was 35.6° (28.0-39.7°), and the distance between screw heads was 17.6 mm (15.1-20.4 mm). The median screw length for C6 was 20.0 mm (19.0-22.0 mm), the screw angle was 29.2° (25.2-36.8°), and the distance between screw heads was 20.4 mm (16.1-24.4 mm).
    CONCLUSIONS: The major limitations of the LLMS technique were inadequate screw angle, difficulty inserting long screws, inadequate decompression, and the inability to perform cervical laminoplasty. However, these limitations did not substantially affect the efficiency of LLMS. LLMS has fewer complications and can insert longer screws than LMS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定带矫形器的颈椎后路多节段融合术(PCF)术后前4周的颈部疼痛是否等同于不带矫形器的多节段PCF。
    方法:患者以1:1的比例随机分配给术后矫形器(CO)6周或无矫形器(NO)。随机化按适应症分层(创伤性与退化),术前使用阿片类药物。使用了重复测量的纵向回归模型。使用双侧95%置信区间(CI)来检验等效性。如果CI位于预先确定的等效界限(-2.0至2.0疼痛评分)之间,则两组被认为是等效的。使用多重插补程序来替换丢失的数据。
    结果:每组有31名患者入选。在基线,CO组有更多的颈部疼痛(5.3vs.3.2,p=0.013)。CO组术后四周颈部疼痛强度评分为4.6±0.3。NO组4.9±0.3。95%置信区间(-1.2至0.6)在预先确定的等效界限内。颈部残疾指数,生活质量分数,和手臂疼痛相似。CO组11例患者和NO组12例患者发生不良事件。CO组在第6周时活动范围减小。
    结论:对于接受或不接受颈椎矫形器治疗的多级PCF患者,术后前4周的疼痛评分相当。我们的发现不支持常规使用术后颈椎矫形器控制术后疼痛。临床试验登记号NCT04308122,2020年4月22日。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine whether postoperative neck pain in the first 4 weeks following multi-level posterior cervical fusion (PCF) with orthosis is equivalent to multi-level PCF without orthosis.
    METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to postoperative orthosis (CO) for 6 weeks or no orthosis (NO). Randomization was stratified by indication (traumatic vs. degenerative), and preoperative opioid use. A model of longitudinal regression for repeated measures was used. The two-sided 95% confidence interval (CI) was used to test equivalence. If the CI lay between the pre-determined margin of equivalence (-2.0 to + 2.0 pain score) the two groups were considered equivalent. A multiple imputation procedure was used to replace missing data.
    RESULTS: Thirty-one patients were enrolled in each group. At baseline, the CO group had more neck pain (5.3 vs. 3.2, p = 0.013). The Four week post-operative neck pain intensity score was 4.6 ± 0.3 for the CO group vs. 4.9 ± 0.3 for the NO group. The 95% confidence interval (-1.2 to 0.6) was within the pre-determined equivalence margin. Neck Disability Index, quality-of-life scores, and arm pain were similar. Eleven patients in the CO group and 12 patients in the NO group had an adverse event. The CO group had reduced range of motion at 6 weeks.
    CONCLUSIONS: Pain scores over the first 4 weeks after surgery were equivalent for patients undergoing multi-level PCF treated with or without a cervical orthosis. Our findings do not support the routine use of a postoperative cervical orthosis for postoperative pain control. Clinical Trials Registration Number NCT04308122, April 22, 2020.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号