Zirconia ceramic implants are commercially available from a rapidly growing number of manufacturers. Macroscopic and microscopic surface design and characteristics are considered to be key determining factors in the success of the osseointegration process. It is, therefore, crucial to assess which surface modification promotes the most favorable biological response. The purpose of this study was to conduct a comparison of modern surface modifications that are featured in the most common commercially available zirconia ceramic implant systems. A review of the currently available literature on zirconia implant surface topography and the associated bio-physical factors was conducted, with a focus on the osseointegration of zirconia surfaces. After a review of the selected articles for this study, commercially available zirconia implant surfaces were all modified using subtractive protocols. Commercially available ceramic implant surfaces were modified or enhanced using sandblasting, acid etching, laser etching, or combinations of the aforementioned. From our literature review, laser-modified surfaces emerged as the ones with the highest surface roughness and bone-implant contact (BIC). It was also found that surface roughness could be controlled to achieve optimal roughness by modifying the laser output power during manufacturing. Furthermore, laser surface modification induced a very low amount of preload microcracks in the zirconia. Osteopontin (OPN), an early-late osteogenic differentiation marker, was significantly upregulated in laser-treated surfaces. Moreover, surface wettability was highest in laser-treated surfaces, indicating favorable hydrophilicity and thus promoting early bone forming, cell adhesion, and subsequent maturation. Sandblasting followed by laser modification and sandblasting followed by acid etching and post-milling heat treatment (SE-H) surfaces featured comparable results, with favorable biological responses around zirconia implants.

OBJECTIVE: Bone marrow defects of the jaw (BMDJ) surrounding dental implants, in combination with impaired bone-to-implant contact (BIC), are difficult to detect in X-rays. This study evaluated BMDJ surrounding titanium (Ti-Impl) and ceramic (Cer-Impl) dental implants and incomplete BIC using a new trans-alveolar ultrasonography device (TAU) with numerical scaling for BIC.
METHODS: The titanium stimulation test (Ti-Stim) was used to detect immune overactivation in response to titanium. Bone density surrounding implants was measured using TAU. We also validated osteoimmune dysregulation.
RESULTS: TAU values showed reduced BIC and decreased osseointegration for Ti-Impl. Moreover, TAU values in the Cer-Impl group were more than twice those in the Ti-Impl cohort. The multiplex analysis of C-C motif chemokine 5 (CCL5, also known as RANTES) expression revealed a 20-fold increase in BMDJ surrounding Ti-Impl. Higher levels of CCL5 inflammation were present in the positive Ti-Stim group.
CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that Cer-Impl have an osteoimmune advantage over Ti-Impl. The key determinant for osteoimmune sustainability appears to be the absence of inflammation at the implant site. We therefore recommend the use of TAU to assess the implant site prior to implantation.

Hip arthroplasty effectively treats advanced osteoarthritis and is therefore entitled as \"operation of the 20th century.\" With demographic shifts, the USA alone is projected to perform up to 850 000 arthroplasties annually by 2030. Many implants now feature a ceramic head, valued for strength and wear resistance. Nonetheless, a fraction, up to 0.03% may fracture during their lifespan, demanding complex removal procedures. To address this, a radiation-free, fluorescence-based image-guided surgical technique is presented. The method uses the inherent fluorescence of ceramic implant materials, demonstrated through chemical and optical analysis of prevalent implant types. Specifically, Biolox delta implants exhibited strong fluorescence around 700 nm with a 74% photoluminescence quantum yield. Emission tails are identified extending into the near-infrared (NIR-I) biological transparency range, forming a vital prerequisite for the label-free visualization of fragments. This ruby-like fluorescence could be attributed to Cr within the zirconia-toughened alumina matrix, enabling the detection of even deep-seated millimeter-sized fragments via camera-assisted techniques. Additionally, fluorescence microscopy allowed detection of µm-sized ceramic particles, enabling debris visualization in synovial fluid as well as histological samples. This label-free optical imaging approach employs readily accessible equipment and can seamlessly transition to clinical settings without significant regulatory barriers, thereby enhancing the safety, efficiency, and minimally invasive nature of fractured ceramic implant removal procedures.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review assessed the available evidence on the survival and success rate of zirconia and titanium implants. As secondary outcomes, aesthetic, radiographic and clinical parameters, as well as biological and mechanical complications, were considered.
METHODS: A systematic search was performed up to March 2022 to identify CCTs/RCTs comparing zirconia and titanium implants with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up. Meta-analysis was performed when ≥ 2 articles with similar characteristics were retrieved.
RESULTS: Four published articles with two RCTs (2 different patient populations) with 100 zirconia and 99 titanium implants that were followed up over 12-80 months were selected out of the 6040 articles. A non-statistically significant difference between zirconia and titanium implant survival at 12 months was suggested (P = 0.0938). The success rates were 57.5-93.3% and 57.1-100% for zirconia and titanium implants, respectively. The pink aesthetic score (PES) was higher for zirconia (10.33 ± 2.06 to 11.38 ± 0.92) compared to titanium implants (8.14 ± 3.58 to 11.56 ± 1.0).
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the 2 RCTs retrieved in the literature, similar survival rates were reported for zirconia and titanium implants in the short term (12 months of follow-up). Future RCTs are warranted to evaluate the long-term outcomes of zirconia implants.
CONCLUSIONS: Zirconia implants may be the procedure of choice, particularly in the aesthetic zone, since they show a similar survival and success rate as titanium implants on a short-term follow-up.
BACKGROUND: Systematic review registration number-CRD42021288704 (PROSPERO).

This study aimed to evaluate temperature changes in titanium and ceramic implants after using a 445-nm diode laser under different in vitro conditions. Titanium (Ti) and ceramic (Zr) dental implants were placed into a bone analog, and an intrabony defect was created at each implant. A 445-nm diode laser was used to irradiate the defects for 30 seconds, noncontact, at 2 W in continuous wave (c.w.) and pulsed mode. The experiment was done at room temperature (21.0 ± 1°C) and in a water bath (37.0 ± 1°C). Two thermocouple probes were used to record real-time temperature changes (°C) at the coronal part of the implant (Tc) and the apex (Ta). The temperature was recorded at time 0 (To) and after 30 seconds of irradiation (Tf). The average temperature change was calculated, and a descriptive analysis was conducted (P < .05). The Ti implant resulted in the highest ΔT values coronally (29.6°C) and apically (6.7°C) using continuous wave at 21°C. The Zr implant increased to 26.4°C coronally and 5.2°C apically. In the water bath, the coronal portion of the Ti and Zr implants rose to 14.2°C and 14.01°C, respectively, using continuous waves. The ΔT values for Ti were 11.9°C coronally and 1.7°C apically when placed in a water bath using pulsed mode. The lowest ΔT occurred on the Zr implant with ΔTc and ΔTa of 4.8°C and 0.78°C, respectively. Under in vitro conditions, the 445-nm diode laser in pulsed mode seems to be safe for use on ceramic implants and should be used with caution on titanium implants.

The aim of this study was to find a suitable material combination to avoid cement excess in the marginal region of one-piece zirconia implant-supported restorations by means of a hybrid crown consisting of a meso- and a suprastructure. One-piece zirconia implants (n = 120) were embedded in epoxy resin. Microfilled resin composite mesostructures (n = 60), designed as caps, were bonded on the implant abutment with a primer only. A molar crown was constructed and cemented with a resin cement on top of the mesostructure as a suprastructure out of feldspar ceramic (n = 12), lithium-disilicate (n = 24), or zirconia (n = 24). Fracture load (n = 6) and retention force (n = 6) were measured immediately after storage in distilled water at 37 °C for 24 h, as well as after an additional exposure to artificial aging in a chewing simulator and simultaneous thermal cycling. For the measurement of the fracture load, monolithic crowns made of the employed restorative materials and identical in shape to the hybrid crowns served as controls (n = 6 each). Fracture load values for feldspar ceramic and lithium-disilicate hybrid crowns were slightly higher than those for the respective monolithic crowns at baseline and after aging, which was statistically significant only for feldspar crowns after aging. In contrast, fracture load values for zirconia monolithic crowns were higher than those for zirconia hybrid crowns, which was only statistically significant after aging. Artificial aging reduced the fracture load of feldspar and lithium-disilicate crowns both for hybrid and monolithic crowns. The effect was only statistically significant for lithium disilicate hybrid crowns. The fracture load for hybrid and monolithic zirconia crowns was increased by artificial aging without reaching statistical significance. The retention force of lithium-disilicate and zirconia hybrid crowns was not affected by artificial aging. Taking into account retention force and fracture load, lithium-disilicate hybrid crowns showed promising results.

BACKGROUND: A high-flexion posterior-stabilized total knee prosthesis has been developed for the Asian population. The component design was based on computed tomography images of Japanese osteoarthritic knees. The femoral component is composed of zirconia ceramics, which exhibit low friction and high durability. The present study aimed to evaluate the mid-term clinical outcomes of this implant.
METHODS: This study included 334 knees of 210 patients who underwent primary total knee arthroplasty with this implant at our hospital between October 2010 and December 2014. The patients comprised 28 men and 172 women with an average age of 73 years. The average follow-up period was 5.9 years, and the follow-up rate was 71.1%. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Knee Society scoring system, 2011 Knee Society questionnaire, and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score. Kaplan-Meier survivorship analysis was performed to determine the cumulative prosthesis survival rate.
RESULTS: In terms of clinical outcomes at the final follow-up, the average ranges of motion were -2.0 in extension and 126.7 in flexion. The Knee Society knee and function scores were 94.2% and 72.6%, respectively. With revision surgery or radiographic failure for any reason as the endpoint, the survival rates at 5 and 9 years were 98.2% and 95.5%, respectively. The most common reason for revision surgery or radiological failure was aseptic loosening.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite several revision cases mainly due to aseptic loosening, the present study found that this new high-flexion posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty prosthesis design showed comparable results for Asian populations with other PS prosthesis.
METHODS: Level Ⅱ (Prospective cohort study).

OBJECTIVE: To assess the clinical performance of a two-piece zirconia implant system (PURE Ceramic Implants, Straumann, Basel, Switzerland) in the maxilla after a follow-up period of more than 1 year.
METHODS: A total of 19 patients in three centres received 24 single-tooth implants in the maxilla. The implants were restored after a mean healing period of 7.1 ± 0.4 months (range 7 to 9 months). Implant survival, implant success, Plaque Index, probing pocket depth, bleeding on probing, mucosal recession/creeping attachment, width of keratinised mucosa, papilla index and pink aesthetic score were evaluated after prosthetic loading (T0), after 6 months (T1) and at the final follow-up (T2, mean 15.0 ± 2.1 months, range 12 to 19 months).
RESULTS: All implants survived and were suitable for retaining prostheses. Low values were recorded for Plaque Index (0.38 ± 0.68) and probing pocket depth (2.49 ± 0.49 mm). Bleeding on probing increased significantly from T0 (21.7%) to T1 (50.0%) (P = 0.0342) and then remained stable (50.0% at T2). No recession was detected around any of the implants. A statistically significant increase in attachment level was observed from T0 to T2 (0.79 ± 0.88 mm; P = 0.0196). A papilla index of 2.27 ± 0.81 and pink aesthetic score of 11.67 ± 1.60 at T2 indicated a completely satisfying aesthetic result.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the limitations of the present study, the two-piece zirconia implant system investigated achieved fully satisfying functional and aesthetic results.

There is currently a lack of guidelines for clinicians regarding titanium hypersensitivity in implant dentistry. Diagnostic tests such as the epicutaneous test or the lymphocyte transformation test showed inconsistent results regarding reliability and validity and thus, evidence-based consensus recommendations regarding diagnostic and therapeutic options may be helpful in clinical decision-making. Therefore, the German S3 guideline on titanium hypersensitivity in implant dentistry was developed.
In the objectives, procedure, voting method and venue were defined and the consensus participants were invited. A systematic literature research was performed, and the overall quality of the evidence was rated according to the GRADE working group. Eight recommendations were formulated within the framework of a structured consensus conference under independent moderation and could be voted on with strong consensus (> 95% agreement). The formulated statements and recommendations were developed in small groups according to the guidelines of the Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) and were discussed and agreed upon in the plenum.
For reasonable decision-making, a patient\'s clinical symptoms should be regarded as leading parameters, which are usually expressed by a local inflammatory reaction with subsequent disturbed osseous integration. Allergy tests, such as the epicutaneous test or the lymphocyte transformation test are not helpful in titanium intolerance assessments, since these tests indicate T cell-mediated allergies, which are not observed in titanium intolerance reactions. Other metals and impurities that might be present in superstructures or alloys also need to be considered as the cause of an intolerance reaction and a trigger for contact sensitization. In the case of a suspected titanium particle-related, local immunologically induced inflammatory reaction with subsequent impaired osseous integration, dental ceramic implants can be considered as a therapeutic option.

Applying antibacterial coatings to dental implant materials seems reasonable but can have negative influences on desired cell adhesion and healing. In this study, zirconia abutment specimens interacting with gingival tissue were used. The aim was to compare the influence of machined or coated zirconia surfaces on the adhesion and proliferation of human gingival fibroblasts (HGF-1). Surface modifications were performed using atmospheric plasma coating with hydroxyapatite, zinc, and copper. Zirconia specimens were divided into four groups: hydroxyapatite, hydroxyapatite with zinc oxide (ZnO), hydroxyapatite with copper (Cu), and an untreated machined surface. After the characterization of the surface conditions, the morphology of adhered HGF-1 was determined by fluorescence staining and subjected to statistical evaluation. The visual analysis of cell morphology by SEM showed flat, polygonal, and largely adherent fibroblast cells in the untreated group, while round to partially flat cells were recorded in the groups with hydroxyapatite, hydroxyapatite + ZnO, and hydroxyapatite + Cu. The cell membranes in the hydroxyapatite + ZnO and hydroxyapatite + Cu groups appeared porous. The results show that HGF-1 adhere and proliferate well on machined zirconia, while plasma coating with hydroxyapatite or hydroxyapatite mixtures does not lead to increased adhesion or proliferation.