Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services

医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    过敏反应是一种严重的危及生命的过敏反应,它在医疗保健数据库中的准确识别可以利用“大数据”用于医疗保健或公共卫生目的的潜力。
    这项研究使用了2015年10月1日至2019年2月28日从CMS数据库中获得的索赔数据,以检查机器学习在识别偶发过敏反应病例中的实用性。我们创建了一个特征选择管道来识别不同数据集之间的关键特征。然后使用了各种无监督和有监督的方法(例如,Sammon映射和极限梯度提升)在不同数据质量的数据集上训练模型,这反映了医疗数据库中地面实况数据的不同可用性和潜在稀有性。
    在实际数据上进行测试时,所得到的机器学习模型精度范围为47.7%至94.4%。最后,我们发现了新的功能,以帮助专家加强现有的案例发现算法。
    开发精确的算法来检测索赔中的医疗结果可能是一个费力且昂贵的过程,特别是对于呈现和编码不同的条件。我们发现过滤掉用于数据管理的高效代码以识别底层模式和特征是有益的。要在必要时改进基于规则的算法,研究人员可以使用模型解释器来确定值得注意的特征,然后可以与专家共享并包含在算法中。
    我们的工作表明,机器学习模型可以在与先前发布的专家案例发现算法相似的水平上执行。同时还具有通过识别用于算法构造的新的相关特征来提高性能或简化算法构造过程的潜力。
    UNASSIGNED: Anaphylaxis is a severe life-threatening allergic reaction, and its accurate identification in healthcare databases can harness the potential of \"Big Data\" for healthcare or public health purposes.
    UNASSIGNED: This study used claims data obtained between October 1, 2015 and February 28, 2019 from the CMS database to examine the utility of machine learning in identifying incident anaphylaxis cases. We created a feature selection pipeline to identify critical features between different datasets. Then a variety of unsupervised and supervised methods were used (eg, Sammon mapping and eXtreme Gradient Boosting) to train models on datasets of differing data quality, which reflects the varying availability and potential rarity of ground truth data in medical databases.
    UNASSIGNED: Resulting machine learning model accuracies ranged from 47.7% to 94.4% when tested on ground truth data. Finally, we found new features to help experts enhance existing case-finding algorithms.
    UNASSIGNED: Developing precise algorithms to detect medical outcomes in claims can be a laborious and expensive process, particularly for conditions presented and coded diversely. We found it beneficial to filter out highly potent codes used for data curation to identify underlying patterns and features. To improve rule-based algorithms where necessary, researchers could use model explainers to determine noteworthy features, which could then be shared with experts and included in the algorithm.
    UNASSIGNED: Our work suggests machine learning models can perform at similar levels as a previously published expert case-finding algorithm, while also having the potential to improve performance or streamline algorithm construction processes by identifying new relevant features for algorithm construction.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了减少医疗保险处方药支出,2022年《降低通货膨胀法案》(IRA)允许医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)直接与药品制造商就符合某些资格标准的高支出药品(每年支出≥2亿美元)的医疗保险价格进行谈判.然而,目前尚不清楚Medicare涵盖的高支出药物比例,和可归属的年度药品支出,通常有资格在给定年份进行CMS谈判。
    我们使用历史医疗保险药物支出数据来确定有多少高支出药物,和可归属的药品支出,如果IRA从2016年至2019年生效,则将有资格参加CMS谈判,同时还确定IRA的资格标准中哪一个限制性最强。
    从2016年到2019年,大约三分之一(B部分为33.3%,D部分)高支出医疗保险药物的32.4%将有资格进行谈判,不合格药物占医疗保险B部分和D部分高支出药物支出的75.2%和63.8%,分别。大多数不合格的高支出药物都不合格,因为它们推出得太早了。从2016年至2019年,每年有59至74个高支出药物符合条件,表明在某些年份,CMS可能没有足够的合格药物来协商法律允许的最大药物数量。
    IRA的当前资格标准可能会限制CMS无法就Medicare所涵盖的大约三分之二的高支出药物的药物价格进行谈判,并且可能不允许CMS就法律允许的最大药物数量进行谈判。国会可以考虑放宽价格谈判的资格要求,例如与发射日期最近有关的,确保有足够数量的高支出药物符合谈判条件,或使某些不符合资格的药物符合年度Medicare重大支出的条件。
    UNASSIGNED: To reduce Medicare prescription drug expenditures, the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) allows the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) to directly negotiate with drug manufacturers on Medicare prices of high-expenditure drugs (≥$200m annual spending) which meet certain eligibility criteria. However, it is unclear what proportion of high-expenditure drugs covered by Medicare, and attributable annual drug spending, would typically be eligible for CMS negotiations in a given year.
    UNASSIGNED: We used historical Medicare drug spending data to determine how many high-expenditure drugs, and attributable drug spending, would have been eligible for CMS negotiations had the IRA been in effect from 2016-2019, while also determining which of the IRA\'s eligibility criteria is most restrictive.
    UNASSIGNED: From 2016-2019, approximately one third (33.3% for Part B, 32.4% for Part D) of high-expenditure Medicare drugs would have been eligible for negotiation, with ineligible drugs accounting for 75.2% and 63.8% of spending on high-expenditure drugs in Medicare Part B and D, respectively. Most ineligible high-expenditure drugs were ineligible because they launched too recently. From 2016-2019, between 59 and 74 high-expenditure drugs were eligible per year, indicating that in some years there may not be enough eligible drugs for CMS to negotiate on the maximum number of drugs allowable by law.
    UNASSIGNED: The IRA\'s current eligibility criteria may restrict CMS from being able to negotiate drug prices on approximately two-thirds of the high-expenditure drugs covered by Medicare and may not allow CMS to negotiate on the maximum number of drugs allowable by law. Congress could consider relaxing eligibility requirements for price negotiation, such as those pertaining to launch date recency, to ensure there are a sufficient number of high-expenditure drugs eligible for negotiation or make certain ineligible drugs contributing to significant annual Medicare spending eligible for negotiation on a case-by-case basis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较医生对玻璃体视网膜手术的报销费用与基于办公室的患者护理。方法:进行了理论模型,将10种最常见的玻璃体视网膜手术的医师工作报销与可能在同一全球时间段内生成的基于办公室的工作相对价值单位(wRVU)进行比较。参考医生建模为每8小时工作日40名患者。在30名患者/天和50名患者/天的情况下,对容量较低的医生和容量较大的医生进行建模,分别。手术的报销率和分配时间是基于医疗保险设定的2021年值,每个办公室访问的平均wRVU基于Vestrum视网膜医疗数据库的2021年实际数据。结果:在参考案例中,进行10项最常见的玻璃体视网膜手术中的任何一项都与机会成本相关,加权平均值为49%(范围,40%-68%)相对于失去的办公室生产力。医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)分配了73分钟的加权平均服务时间;然而,参考医生必须以5分钟的加权平均值完成手术(范围,-31-12分钟),用于外科手术wRVU以平等的办公室报销。即使对于容量较低的医师,进行这10次手术也与25%的机会成本相关,对于容量较大的医师,则为61%。在超过99%的模拟场景中,使用一系列条件的概率敏感性分析确定了手术的机会成本。结论:相对于同等时间的基于办公室的患者护理,玻璃体视网膜手术的医师工作部分的医疗保险报销对医师来说是巨大的机会成本。特别是对于更忙碌的医生。该模型没有探索实践间接费用保险和职业责任保险,这些因素由CMS单独考虑,可能会影响机会成本,具体取决于利用率。手术报销与同等办公室报销的平均阈值手术时间可能难以实现。
    Purpose: To compare physician reimbursements for vitreoretinal surgeries with office-based patient care. Methods: A theoretical model was performed comparing physician work reimbursements for the 10 most common vitreoretinal surgeries with office-based work relative value units (wRVUs) that could have been generated during the same global time period. The reference physician was modeled at 40 patients per 8-hour workday. A lower volume physician and higher volume physician were modeled at 30 patients/day and 50 patients/day, respectively. The reimbursement rates and allocated times for surgery were based on the 2021 values set by Medicare, and the average wRVU per office visit was based on 2021 real-world data from the Vestrum Retinal Healthcare Database. Results: In the reference case, performing any of the 10 most common vitreoretinal surgeries was associated with an opportunity cost with a weighted mean of 49% (range, 40%-68%) relative to lost office productivity. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) allocated a weighted mean intraservice time of 73 minutes; however, the reference physician would have to complete the surgery with a weighted average of 5 minutes (range, -31-12 minutes) for surgical wRVUs to equal office-based reimbursements. Performing these 10 surgeries was associated with a 25% opportunity cost even for the lower volume physician and 61% for the higher volume physician. Probability sensitivity analysis with a range of conditions identified opportunity costs from surgery in over 99% of simulated scenarios. Conclusions: Medicare reimbursements for the physician work component of vitreoretinal surgeries represented a significant opportunity cost for the physician relative to office-based patient care of equivalent time, especially for busier physicians. The model did not explore practice overhead and professional liability insurance, which are factored separately by CMS and may influence the opportunity cost depending on utilization. The average threshold surgery times for surgical reimbursements to equal office-based reimbursements may be difficult to achieve.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于利益相关者关注美国器官采购系统,需要能够对器官采购提供者进行比较评估的工具。我们为器官采购组织(OPO)开发了一个面向公众的仪表板,使用来自多个来源的数据,创建一个在线,2010-2020年期间OPO实践条件和性能的可视化。有了这个工具,OPO可以在每100例捐赠一致死亡的捐赠者的CMS指标上进行比较,以及循环系统死亡后捐赠(DCD)采购,采购老年人和少数民族患者群体,在较小的医院采购,并采购无明显用药史的患者。确定了更高性能的模式,总体捐助者采购率差异的74%可以用模型变量来解释。黑人和非白人患者人群中的OPO表现对采购差异的影响更大,更可重复。以及在较小的医院,而不是按捐赠服务区(DSA)的特点。像我们这样的仪表板在质量改进行动中支持OPO和利益相关者,通过利用器官采购临床提供商之间的基准性能数据。
    With stakeholder focus on the United States organ procurement system, there is a need for tools that permit comparative assessment of organ procurement providers. We developed a public-facing dashboard for organ procurement organizations (OPOs), using data from multiple sources, to create an online, readily accessible visualization of OPO practice conditions and performance for the period 2010-2020. With this tool, OPOs can be compared on the CMS metric of donors procured per 100 donation-consistent deaths, as well as donation after circulatory death procurement, procurement of older and minority patient populations, procurement in smaller hospitals, and procurement of patients without a significant drug history. Patterns of higher performance were identified, and 74% of differences in overall donor procurement rates could be explained using model variables. Procurement differences were affected to a greater and more reproducible degree by OPO performance among Black and non-White patient populations, as well as in smaller hospitals, than by donation service area characteristics. Dashboards such as ours support OPOs and stakeholders in quality improvement actions, through leveraging benchmarked performance data among organ procurement clinical providers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    住院患者的营养不良会影响健康结果,生活质量,和健康公平。质量改进措施和质量测量可以帮助改善那些营养不良的住院患者的护理。新的全球营养不良综合评分(GMCS)最近被医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)采用,作为一项注重健康公平的措施。从2024年开始,GMCS可通过CMS医院住院质量报告计划进行报告。GMCS提供了一个机会,可以在整个跨学科医院决策过程中提高患者营养状况和基于证据的干预措施的重要性。为了促进这个机会,美国肠外和肠内营养学会(ASPEN)举办了“全球营养不良综合评分的跨专业实施”网络研讨会,作为其2022年营养不良意识周计划的一部分。本文总结了GMCS措施的基本原理和意义,并展示了将质量改进和测量纳入急性护理环境的临床观察结果。正如在网络研讨会上介绍的那样。
    Malnutrition in hospitalized patients can impact health outcomes, quality of life, and health equity. Quality improvement initiatives and quality measurement can help improve the care of those hospitalized patients with malnutrition. The new Global Malnutrition Composite Score (GMCS) was recently adopted by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) as a health equity-focused measure. Beginning in 2024, the GMCS is available for reporting through the CMS Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting Program. The GMCS provides an opportunity to elevate the importance of patient nutrition status and evidence-based interventions throughout the interdisciplinary hospital decision-making process. To promote this opportunity, the American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (ASPEN) held an \"Interprofessional implementation of the Global Malnutrition Composite Score\" webinar as part of its 2022 Malnutrition Awareness Week programming. This article summarizes the underlying rationale and significance of the GMCS measure and showcases clinical observations about integrating quality improvement and measurement into the acute care setting, as presented during the webinar.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在整个二十一世纪,国家和地方政府,私营卫生部门,健康保险公司,医疗保健专业人员,工会,消费者一直在努力开发一种有效的评估方法,报告,并提高医疗质量。1随着医学的改进和卫生系统的发展,以满足患者的需求,护理有效性的绩效评估系统也必须发展。应继续努力有效衡量护理质量,以建立更知情的公众,改善健康结果,降低医疗成本。因此,最近的政策改革要求在医疗保健中实施绩效系统,“绩效衡量”是该系统的基础,在该系统中,所有医疗保健都必须积极参与,以确保为患者提供最佳护理。绩效指标的制定可能非常复杂,特别是在创建特定于专业的绩效指标时。为了帮助皮肤科医生了解创建皮肤病学特定绩效指标的过程,以参与在地方或国家层面创建或实施绩效指标,这篇文章在两部分继续医学教育系列回顾了类型,组件,和发展过程,reviewing,并实施绩效指标。
    Throughout the 21st century, national and local governments, private health sectors, health insurance companies, healthcare professionals, labor unions, and consumers have been striving to develop an effective approach to evaluate, report, and improve the quality of healthcare. As medicine improves and health systems grow to meet patient needs, the performance measurement system of care effectiveness must also evolve. Continual efforts should be undertaken to effectively measure quality of care to create a more informed public, improve health outcomes, and reduce healthcare costs. As such, recent policy reform has necessitated that performance systems be implemented in healthcare, with the \"performance measure\" being the foundation of the system in which all of healthcare must be actively engaged in to ensure optimal care for patients. The development of performance measures can be highly complex, particularly when creating specialty-specific performance measures. To help dermatologists understand the process of creating dermatology-specific performance measures to engage in creating or implementing performance measures at the local or national levels, this article in the two-part continuing medical education series reviews the types, components, and process of developing, reviewing, and implementing performance measures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    获得人工耳蜗植入可能会受到经济负担的限制,对于医院或制造商之间的人工耳蜗(CI)设备价格差异的程度知之甚少。我们对CI设备的私人付款人协商价格进行了横截面分析。总的来说,161家医院进行了分析。医院和付款人之间的价格差异很大。尽管制造商之间在toCI用户结果方面存在临床平衡,确定了价格的显著差异,MED-EL的价格(38,478±2633美元)高于耳蜗有限公司(34,150±2418美元,p<.001)。对CochlearLtd.设备的加价分析显示,平均加价超过公司的平均销售价格(24,649美元)的58.5%±7.4%。当所有3个品牌都在同一中心提供时,谈判价格也至少降低了5000美元(p<.05)。需要进一步研究患者预后和医院数量对价格的影响。
    Access to cochlear implantation can be restricted by financial burden, and little is known about the extent to which cochlear implant (CI) devices prices may vary between hospitals or manufacturers. We performed a cross-sectional analysis of private payer-negotiated prices for CI devices. In total, 161 hospitals were analyzed. Prices varied widely across hospitals and between payers. Despite clinical equipoise between manufacturers with regards to CI user outcomes, significant differences in prices were identified, with higher prices for MED-EL ($38,478 ± 2633) than for Cochlear Ltd. ($34,150 ± 2418, p < .001). Markup analysis for Cochlear Ltd. devices revealed a mean 58.5% ± 7.4% markup in excess of the company\'s average sales price ($24,649). Negotiated prices were also at least $5000 lower when all 3 brands were offered at the same center (p < .05). Further research examining the influence of patient outcomes and hospital volume on prices are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)最近发布了美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准的用于治疗阿尔茨海默病(AD)的抗淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体(mAb)的全国覆盖范围确定。CED方案很复杂,昂贵的,具有挑战性,由于行政和实施问题,往往无法实现预期目标。AD是一种异构的,具有复杂护理途径的进行性神经退行性疾病,这也带来了与评估CED方案的研究设计和方法选择相关的科学挑战。本文讨论了这些挑战。美国退伍军人事务医疗保健系统的临床发现有助于我们讨论CED所需的AD有效性研究的具体挑战。
    The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has recently issued a national coverage determination for US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved anti-amyloid monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) for the treatment of Alzheimer\'s disease (AD) under coverage with evidence development (CED). CED schemes are complex, costly, and challenging, and often fail to achieve intended objectives because of administrative and implementation issues. AD is a heterogeneous, progressive neurodegenerative disorder with complex care pathway that additionally presents scientific challenges related to the choice of study design and methods used in evaluating CED schemes. These challenges are herein discussed. Clinical findings from the US Veterans Affairs healthcare system help inform our discussion of specific challenges to CED-required effectiveness studies in AD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)是一种常见的妊娠期代谢性疾病,威胁着数百万妇女及其后代的健康。GDM患病率最高的是社会经济地位低的女性。GDM女性产妇不良结局的风险增加,包括剖宫产率的增加,先兆子痫,会阴的眼泪,产后出血。然而,更令人担忧的是,由于怀孕期间血糖升高,胎儿和儿童长期健康的风险增加。尽管使用连续血糖监测(CGM)已被证明可以降低1型糖尿病和2型糖尿病孕妇的母体和胎儿并发症的发生率,大多数州医疗补助计划不涵盖GDM女性的CGM。本文回顾了当前与医疗补助受益人中GDM的发生率和成本相关的统计数据,总结了使用CGM的妊娠研究的关键发现,并提出了在州医疗补助人群中扩大和标准化GDM的CGM覆盖范围的理由。
    Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common metabolic disease of pregnancy that threatens the health of several million women and their offspring. The highest prevalence of GDM is seen in women of low socioeconomic status. Women with GDM are at increased risk of adverse maternal outcomes, including increased rates of Cesarean section delivery, preeclampsia, perineal tears, and postpartum hemorrhage. However, of even greater concern is the increased risk to the fetus and long-term health of the child due to elevated glycemia during pregnancy. Although the use of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) has been shown to reduce the incidence of maternal and fetal complications in pregnant women with type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes, most state Medicaid programs do not cover CGM for women with GDM. This article reviews current statistics relevant to the incidence and costs of GDM among Medicaid beneficiaries, summarizes key findings from pregnancy studies using CGM, and presents a rationale for expanding and standardizing CGM coverage for GDM within state Medicaid populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    疗养院是COVID-19传播和死亡的主要环境,但是研究主要只关注疗养院内的因素。我们调查了美国疗养院相关COVID-19感染率与县级和疗养院属性之间的关系。
    我们从医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)最小数据集构建了面板数据,CMS疗养院数据,2010年美国人口普查数据,5年(2012-2016年)美国社区调查估计,县COVID-19感染率。我们分析了2020年6月1日至2021年1月31日在7个五周期间的COVID-19数据。我们使用了最大似然估计器,包括一个自回归项,估计随时间的影响和变化。我们执行了3种模型形式(基本,局部,和完整)进行分析。
    护理(0.005)和工作人员(0.002)短缺的疗养院的COVID-19感染率很高,本地(-0.007)或国有(-0.025)和非营利(-0.011)机构的COVID-19感染率低于私营机构。县级COVID-19感染率与养老院的COVID-19感染率相对应。在研究初期,种族和少数民族群体与疗养院相关的COVID-19感染率很高。县级个人年收入中位数较高(-0.002)与养老院相关的COVID-19感染率较低相关。
    疗养院感染率低的社区可以获得更多资源(例如,财政资源,人员配备),并且在大流行的早期可能比获得很少资源和较差缓解努力的疗养院有更好的缓解努力。未来的研究应解决健康的社会和结构决定因素,这些因素使种族和少数民族人口以及疗养院等机构在危机时期变得脆弱。
    Nursing homes are a primary setting of COVID-19 transmission and death, but research has primarily focused only on factors within nursing homes. We investigated the relationship between US nursing home-associated COVID-19 infection rates and county-level and nursing home attributes.
    We constructed panel data from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) minimum dataset, CMS nursing home data, 2010 US Census data, 5-year (2012-2016) American Community Survey estimates, and county COVID-19 infection rates. We analyzed COVID-19 data from June 1, 2020, through January 31, 2021, during 7 five-week periods. We used a maximum likelihood estimator, including an autoregressive term, to estimate effects and changes over time. We performed 3 model forms (basic, partial, and full) for analysis.
    Nursing homes with nursing (0.005) and staff (0.002) shortages had high COVID-19 infection rates, and locally owned (-0.007) or state-owned (-0.025) and nonprofit (-0.011) agencies had lower COVID-19 infection rates than privately owned agencies. County-level COVID-19 infection rates corresponded with COVID-19 infection rates in nursing homes. Racial and ethnic minority groups had high nursing home-associated COVID-19 infection rates early in the study. High median annual personal income (-0.002) at the county level correlated with lower nursing home-associated COVID-19 infection rates.
    Communities with low rates of nursing home infections had access to more resources (eg, financial resources, staffing) and likely had better mitigation efforts in place earlier in the pandemic than nursing homes that had access to few resources and poor mitigation efforts. Future research should address the social and structural determinants of health that are leaving racial and ethnic minority populations and institutions such as nursing homes vulnerable during times of crises.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号