Categorisation

分类
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    有大量的研究试图对比高速和低速投手,以确定提高速度的特征。然而,俯仰速度存在于一个连续体上。因此,我们的目的是通过检查球速度对肘部外翻扭矩的影响来显示创建速度子组和将速度作为连续变量之间的分析差异。从私人数据库中回顾性地提取了1315名积极竞争的投手的运动捕获数据。我们比较了三种分析方法:(1)外翻扭矩对球速度的线性回归,(2)中值分裂形成的低速和高速组之间的t检验,(3)由上下速度四分位数形成的极低和极高速度组之间的t检验。线性回归表明球速度影响外翻扭矩(p<0.001,R2=0.280)。中值分裂降低了球速度对外翻扭矩的可预测性(p<0.001,R2=0.180)。相反,极端群体分裂人为膨胀效应大小(p<0.001,R2=0.347)。我们建议运动生物力学研究人员不要离散连续变量来形成子组进行分析,因为(1)它会扭曲感兴趣的变量之间的关系,(2)回归方程可以用来估计自变量的任何值的因变量,不仅仅是团体的意思。
    There is a plethora of research attempting to contrast high- and low-velocity pitchers to identify traits to target for increasing velocity. However, pitch velocity exists on a continuum. Therefore, our purpose is to display the analytical discrepancies between creating velocity subgroups and leaving velocity as a continuous variable by examining the influence of ball velocity on elbow valgus torque. Motion capture data for 1315 actively competing pitchers were retrospectively extracted from a private database. We compared three analytic methods: (1) linear regression of valgus torque on ball velocity, (2) t-test between low- and high-velocity groups formed by a median split, and (3) t-test between very low- and very high-velocity groups formed by upper and lower velocity quartiles. Linear regression indicates ball velocity influenced valgus torque (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.280). Median splitting reduced the predictability of ball velocity on valgus torque (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.180). Conversely, extreme group splitting artificially inflated the effect size (p < 0.001, R2 = 0.347). We recommend sports biomechanics researchers not discretise a continuous variable to form subgroups for analysis because (1) it distorts the relationship between the variables of interest and (2) a regression equation can be used to estimate the dependent variable at any value of the independent variable, not just the group means.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人们更喜欢原型刺激而不是非典型刺激。这种原型偏好效应的主要解释是原型刺激被更流畅地处理。然而,最近的一个说法提出,原型与其类别的效价有更强的关联,导致负面类别的原型偏好效应反转。这种类别效价帐户的一个关键但未经测试的假设是,对于完全中性的类别,不应出现任何原型偏好。我们通过积极调节点图案的类别来测试这一预测,消极的,或者中立。根据以前关于类别效价账户的调查结果,对于负条件类别,原型偏好反转。然而,原型偏好在积极和中性类别中同样强烈。这些发现意味着原型偏好不仅反映了类别效价向样本的转移。相反,结果表明,原型偏好是由激活的类别价和基于流畅性的过程引起的多过程现象。我们讨论了对流畅性和原型偏好理论的进一步启示。
    People prefer prototypical stimuli over atypical stimuli. The dominant explanation for this prototype preference effect is that prototypical stimuli are processed more fluently. However, a more recent account proposes that prototypes are more strongly associated with their category\'s valence, leading to a reversed prototype preference effect for negative categories. One critical but untested assumption of this category-valence account is that no prototype preference should emerge for entirely neutral categories. We tested this prediction by conditioning categories of dot patterns positively, negatively, or neutrally. In line with previous findings on the category-valence account, prototype preference reversed for negatively conditioned categories. However, prototype preference was similarly strong for positive and neutral categories. These findings imply that prototype preferences do not only reflect a transfer of category valence to exemplars. Instead, the results suggest that prototype preference is a multi-process phenomenon arising from the activated category valence and a fluency-based process. We discuss further implications for theories on fluency and prototype preference.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    时间平分程序已用于评估时间感知理论。用于测量两个持续时间的感知中点的过程的问题在于,探针持续时间的间隔影响二分点的长度。线性间距导致比对数间距更接近持续时间的算术平均值的较长二分点。在三个实验中,通过提供训练持续时间的算术或几何平均值的单个探针持续时间,可以避免探针持续时间分布的影响。结果发现,将算术平均值分类为长的参与者数量明显大于将其分类为短的参与者数量。将几何平均值分类为短或长的参与者数量没有显着差异。对于0.4s的训练持续时间和1.6s(实验1-3),0.2svs.3.2s(实验2)和0.4svs.6.4s(实验3)。在实验4中,用对数和线性分布的探针持续时间复制了探针试验分布效应,证明在线性间隔的探针持续时间下,平分接近算术平均值。当避免探针间距偏差时,结果提供了反对算术平均值平分的证据,相反,结果与时间的对数编码一致,或基于相对而非绝对差异的比较规则。
    The temporal bisection procedure has been used to assess theories of time perception. A problem with the procedure for measuring the perceived midpoint of two durations is that the spacing of probe durations affects the length of the bisection point. Linear spacing results in longer bisection points closer to the arithmetic mean of the durations than logarithmic spacing. In three experiments, the influence of probe duration distribution was avoided by presenting a single probe duration of either the arithmetic or geometric mean of the trained durations. It was found that the number of participants that categorised the arithmetic mean as long was significantly larger than those that categorised it as short. The number of participants that categorised the geometric mean as either short or long did not significantly differ. This was true for trained durations of 0.4 s vs. 1.6 s (Experiments 1-3), 0.2 s vs. 3.2 s (Experiment 2) and 0.4 s vs. 6.4 s (Experiment 3). In Experiment 4, the probe trial distribution effect was replicated with logarithmic and linearly distributed probe durations, demonstrating that bisection occurs close to the arithmetic mean with linearly spaced probe durations. The results provide evidence against bisection at the arithmetic mean when probe spacing bias is avoided and, instead, the results are consistent with logarithmic encoding of time, or a comparison rule based on relative rather than absolute differences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:日本的癌症咨询和支持中心(CCSCs)已在全国指定的癌症医院建立,这些中心为癌症护理提供信息和咨询支持。这项研究的目的是使用2020年1月至2021年3月癌症咨询支持中心(CCSC)数据库中的咨询记录数据,分析COVID-19大流行期间的咨询状况和内容。
    方法:首先,我们检查了涉及和不涉及COVID-19的病例数量和百分比,并比较了各组之间的条目项目.两组之间的比较表明,在COVID-19大流行之前使用的传统咨询项目没有充分涵盖COVID-19大流行期间的咨询内容。因此,我们对与COVID-19相关的咨询记录的内容进行了分类。
    结果:因此,内容被合并为16个类别,从五个不同的方面适当地捕捉到了。
    结论:使用得到的类别,我们能够创建一个补充咨询进入表格,可以在COVID流行期间运作,并咨询顾问以获得他们所需的支持。
    背景:不适用。
    OBJECTIVE: Cancer Consultation and Support Centres (CCSCs) in Japan have been established at designated cancer hospitals nationwide and these centres provide information and consultation support for cancer care. The purpose of this study is to analyse the status and content of consultations during the COVID-19 pandemic using consultation record data from the Cancer Consultation Support Centre (CCSC) database from January 2020 to March 2021.
    METHODS: First, we examined the number and percentage of cases involving and not involving COVID-19 and compared the items of the entry forms between the groups. The comparison between the two groups suggests that the traditional consultation items used before the COVID-19 pandemic did not adequately cover the consultation content during the COVID-19 pandemic. Therefore, we categorised the content of consultation records related to COVID-19.
    RESULTS: As a result, the content was consolidated into 16 categories, which were appropriately captured from five different aspects.
    CONCLUSIONS: Using the resulting categories, we were able to create a complementary consultation entry form that could be operational during the COVID epidemic and consult consultants for the support they needed.
    BACKGROUND: Not applicable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    根据动物卫生法(AHL)的标准评估鲤鱼春季病毒血症(SVC),特别是第7条关于疾病概况和影响的标准,关于其被列入名单的资格的第5条,附件四,根据疾病预防和控制规则对其进行分类,如第9条和第8条,列出与SVC有关的动物物种。评估是按照AHAW小组先前开发并已发布的临时数据收集和评估方法进行的。报告的结果是专家提供的概率范围的中位数,这表明每个标准是否满足(下限≥66%)(上限≤33%),或者履行是否存在不确定性。推理点是针对结果不确定的标准报告的。根据这里进行的评估,根据AHL第5条,尚不确定SVC是否有资格被列入联盟干预名单(45-90%概率).根据附件四的标准,为了与AHL第9条所述的预防和控制水平相关的分类,AHAW小组得出结论,SVC不符合第1节中的标准(A类;满足标准的5-33%概率),并且不确定是否符合第2、3、4和5节中的标准(B类,C,D和E;33-66%,10-66%,满足标准的45-90%和45-90%的概率,分别)。提供了根据第8条标准为SVC列出的动物物种。
    Spring Viraemia of Carp (SVC) was assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular the criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on its eligibility to be listed, Annex IV for its categorisation according to disease prevention and control rules as in Article 9 and Article 8 for listing animal species related to SVC. The assessment was performed following the ad hoc method for data collection and assessment previously developed by the AHAW panel and already published. The outcome reported is the median of the probability ranges provided by the experts, which indicates whether each criterion is fulfilled (lower bound ≥ 66%) or not (upper bound ≤ 33%), or whether there is uncertainty about fulfilment. Reasoning points are reported for criteria with an uncertain outcome. According to the assessment performed here, it is uncertain whether SVC can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention according to Article 5 of the AHL (45-90% probability). According to the criteria in Annex IV, for the purpose of categorisation related to the level of prevention and control as in Article 9 of the AHL, the AHAW Panel concluded that SVC does not meet the criteria in Section 1 (Category A; 5-33% probability of meeting the criteria) and it is uncertain whether it meets the criteria in Sections 2, 3, 4 and 5 (Categories B, C, D and E; 33-66%, 10-66%, 45-90% and 45-90% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively). The animal species to be listed for SVC according to Article 8 criteria are provided.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    根据动物卫生法(AHL)的标准评估沙门氏菌感染(SAV)。特别是第7条关于疾病概况和影响的标准,关于其被列入名单的资格的第5条,附件四,根据第9条和第8条规定的疾病预防和控制规则对其进行分类,以列出与SAV感染有关的动物物种。评估是按照AHAW小组开发并已发布的临时数据收集和评估方法进行的。报告的结果是专家提供的概率范围的中位数,这表明每个标准是否满足(下限≥66%)(上限≤33%),或者履行是否存在不确定性。推理点是针对结果不确定的标准报告的。根据评估,根据AHL第5条(50-80%概率),尚不确定是否可将感染沙门氏菌病毒列入联盟干预名单.根据附件四的标准,为了与AHL第9条所述的预防和控制水平相关的分类,AHAW小组得出的结论是,沙门氏菌感染不符合第1节中的标准(A类;符合标准的概率为5-10%),并且不确定是否符合第2、3、4和5节中的标准(B类,C,D和E;50-90%,符合标准的概率)。提供了根据第8条标准列出的SAV感染动物物种。
    Infection with salmonid alphavirus (SAV) was assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular the criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on its eligibility to be listed, Annex IV for its categorisation according to disease prevention and control rules as laid out in Article 9 and Article 8 for listing animal species related to infection with SAV. The assessment was performed following the ad hoc method on data collection and assessment developed by AHAW Panel and already published. The outcome reported is the median of the probability ranges provided by the experts, which indicates whether each criterion is fulfilled (lower bound ≥ 66%) or not (upper bound ≤ 33%), or whether there is uncertainty about fulfilment. Reasoning points are reported for criteria with an uncertain outcome. According to the assessment, it was uncertain whether infection with salmonid alphavirus can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention according to Article 5 of the AHL (50-80% probability). According to the criteria in Annex IV, for the purpose of categorisation related to the level of prevention and control as in Article 9 of the AHL, the AHAW Panel concluded that infection with salmonid alphavirus does not meet the criteria in Section 1 (Category A; 5-10% probability of meeting the criteria) and it is uncertain whether it meets the criteria in Sections 2, 3, 4 and 5 (Categories B, C, D and E; 50-90%, probability of meeting the criteria). The animal species to be listed for infection with SAV according to Article 8 criteria are provided.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    根据动物卫生法(AHL)的标准评估细菌性肾病(BKD),特别是第7条关于疾病概况和影响的标准,关于其被列入名单的资格的第5条,附件四,根据第9条和第8条规定的疾病预防和控制规则对其进行分类,以列出与BKD有关的动物物种。评估是按照AHAW小组开发并已发布的临时数据收集和评估方法进行的。报告的结果是专家提供的概率范围的中位数,这表明每个标准是否满足(下限≥66%)(上限≤33%),或者履行是否存在不确定性。推理点是针对结果不确定的标准报告的。根据这一评估,根据AHL第5条,BKD可以被认为有资格被列入联盟干预名单(66-90%的概率)。根据附件四的标准,为了与AHL第9条所述的预防和控制水平相关的分类,AHAW小组得出结论,BKD不符合第1、2和3节的标准(A类,B和C;1-5%,33-66%和33-66%的符合标准的概率,分别),但符合第4节和第5节的标准(类别D和E;满足标准的概率为66-90%和66-90%,分别)。提供了根据第8条标准为BKD列出的动物物种。
    Bacterial kidney disease (BKD) was assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular the criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on its eligibility to be listed, Annex IV for its categorisation according to disease prevention and control rules as laid out in Article 9 and Article 8 for listing animal species related to BKD. The assessment was performed following the ad hoc method on data collection and assessment developed by AHAW Panel and already published. The outcome reported is the median of the probability ranges provided by the experts, which indicates whether each criterion is fulfilled (lower bound ≥ 66%) or not (upper bound ≤ 33%), or whether there is uncertainty about fulfilment. Reasoning points are reported for criteria with an uncertain outcome. According to this assessment, BKD can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention according to Article 5 of the AHL (66-90% probability). According to the criteria in Annex IV, for the purpose of categorisation related to the level of prevention and control as in Article 9 of the AHL, the AHAW Panel concluded that BKD does not meet the criteria in Sections 1, 2 and 3 (Categories A, B and C; 1-5%, 33-66% and 33-66% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively) but meets the criteria in Sections 4 and 5 (Categories D and E; 66-90% and 66-90% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively). The animal species to be listed for BKD according to Article 8 criteria are provided.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    根据《动物卫生法》(AHL)的标准评估了双足感染,特别是,第7条关于疾病概况和影响的标准,关于其被列入名单的资格的第5条,附件四,根据第9条和第8条规定的疾病预防和控制规则对其进行分类,以列出与沙门氏菌感染有关的动物物种。评估是按照AHAW小组先前开发并已发布的临时数据收集和评估方法进行的。报告的结果是专家提供的概率范围的中位数,这表明每个标准是否满足(下限≥66%)(上限≤33%),或者履行是否存在不确定性。推理点是针对结果不确定的标准报告的。根据这里进行的评估,根据AHL第5条的规定,尚不确定是否可以认为salaris感染有资格被列入联盟干预名单(33-70%的可能性).根据附件四的标准,为了与AHL第9条所述的预防和控制水平相关的分类,AHAW小组得出的结论是,S.salaris感染不符合第1和第3节的标准(A和C类;满足标准的概率为1-5%和10-33%,分别),并且不确定它是否符合第2、4和5节(类别B,D和E;33-80%,33-66%和33-80%的符合标准的概率,分别)。提供了根据第8条标准列出的感染S.salaris的动物物种。
    Infection with Gyrodactylus salaris was assessed according to the criteria of the Animal Health Law (AHL), in particular, the criteria of Article 7 on disease profile and impacts, Article 5 on its eligibility to be listed, Annex IV for its categorisation according to disease prevention and control rules as laid down in Article 9 and Article 8 for listing animal species related to infection with G. salaris. The assessment was performed following the ad hoc method for data collection and assessment previously developed by AHAW panel and already published. The outcome reported is the median of the probability ranges provided by the experts, which indicates whether each criterion is fulfilled (lower bound ≥ 66%) or not (upper bound ≤ 33%), or whether there is uncertainty about fulfilment. Reasoning points are reported for criteria with an uncertain outcome. According to the assessment here performed, it is uncertain whether infection with G. salaris can be considered eligible to be listed for Union intervention according to Article 5 of the AHL (33-70% probability). According to the criteria in Annex IV, for the purpose of categorisation related to the level of prevention and control as in Article 9 of the AHL, the AHAW Panel concluded that Infection with G. salaris does not meet the criteria in Section 1 and 3 (Category A and C; 1-5% and 10-33% probability of fulfilling the criteria, respectively) and it is uncertain whether it meets the criteria in Sections 2, 4 and 5 (Categories B, D and E; 33-80%, 33-66% and 33-80% probability of meeting the criteria, respectively). The animal species to be listed for infection with G. salaris according to Article 8 criteria are provided.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    类别变异性或多样性是影响泛化的重要因素。然而,对类别可变性的期望可能不仅取决于遇到的类别成员的可变性,而且还可能由类似类别的先前经验形成。在这项研究中,我们研究了我们是否可以通过在\“A,非A分类任务:参与者在启动阶段学习了同质类别非A或不同类别非A。为了更好地了解转移过程,我们改变了学习阶段的性质,从内隐转移到明确的指令,主动要求参与者使用他们以前的经验。我们发现,虽然使用同质的非A表示,A和非A类别的概括是相等的,在具有不同代表性的启动阶段之后,类别Non-A的泛化范围扩大了。在第二个实验中,我们发现,类别非A的泛化扩展发生在该类别中的样本本身是多样化的(特征多样化条件),而不是当类别包含不同的样本(样本多样化条件)时。这些结果表明,分类受到先前分类经验的影响,这些经验可能会改变类别的表示。Further,这项研究暗示了需要什么样的异质性来观察通常报道的不同类别的更广泛的概括。这一发现不仅对理解先前经验对类别学习的影响有意义,但是任何依赖于概括的认知过程。
    Category variability or diversity is an important factor influencing generalisation. However, expectations of category variability may not only depend on the variability of encountered category members, but may also be shaped by prior experiences with similar categories. In this study, we investigated whether we could influence category generalisation by inducing different category representations in an A/Non-A categorisation task: Participants either learned about a homogeneous category Non-A or a diverse category Non-A during a priming phase. To better understand the transfer process, we varied the nature of the learning phase from implicit transfer to explicit instructions that actively requested participants to use their prior experiences. We found that while with a homogeneous Non-A representation, generalisation of the A and Non-A categories was equal, the generalisation of category Non-A widened after a priming phase with a diverse representation. In a second experiment, we found that the widening of generalisation of category Non-A occurred when the exemplars in this category were themselves diverse (feature-diverse condition) but not when the category contained distinct exemplars (exemplar-diverse condition). These results suggests that categorisation is influenced by previous categorisation experiences possibly altering the representation of a category. Furthermore, the study gives a hint what kind of heterogeneity is needed to observe the commonly reported broader generalisation of diverse categories. The finding has implications not only to understand the influence of prior experiences on category learning, but any cognitive process that hinges on generalisation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基本水平的优势是人类分类中最著名的效果之一。传统帐户认为,基本类别在语义记忆中的概念分类组织中提供了最大的信息量或入门级。然而,这些解释与语言模拟账户等概念系统结构的最新观点并不完全兼容,强调感觉运动的双重作用(即,世界的感知-行动体验)和语言分布信息(即,语言中单词的统计分布)在概念处理中。在四个预注册单词→图片分类研究中,我们研究了感觉运动和语言距离的新颖度量是否有助于分类决策中的基本水平优势。结果表明,类别概念和成员概念之间的感觉运动体验重叠(例如,animal→dog)预测RT和准确性,至少以及传统的离散下属划分,基本的,和上级分类水平。此外,语言分布信息有助于捕获等级类别结构的影响,而典型性等级则没有。最后,当考虑到图像标签产生频率时(即,人们实际为图像制作特定标签的频率),语言分布信息预测了感觉运动信息以外的RT和准确性。这些发现增加了我们对概念系统的感觉运动-语言理论如何解释分类行为的理解。
    The basic-level advantage is one of the best-known effects in human categorisation. Traditional accounts argue that basic-level categories present a maximally informative or entry level into a taxonomic organisation of concepts in semantic memory. However, these explanations are not fully compatible with most recent views on the structure of the conceptual system such as linguistic-simulation accounts, which emphasise the dual role of sensorimotor (i.e., perception-action experience of the world) and linguistic distributional information (i.e., statistical distribution of words in language) in conceptual processing. In four preregistered word→picture categorisation studies, we examined whether novel measures of sensorimotor and linguistic distance contribute to the basic level-advantage in categorical decision-making. Results showed that overlap in sensorimotor experience between category concept and member concept (e.g., animal→dog) predicted RT and accuracy at least as well as a traditional division into discrete subordinate, basic, and superordinate taxonomic levels. Furthermore, linguistic distributional information contributed to capturing effects of graded category structure where typicality ratings did not. Finally, when image label production frequency was taken into account (i.e., how often people actually produced specific labels for images), linguistic distributional information predicted RT and accuracy above and beyond sensorimotor information. These findings add to our understanding of how sensorimotor-linguistic theories of the conceptual system can explain categorisation behaviour.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号