UNASSIGNED: Although previous studies have reported a bidirectional relationship between ischemic stroke (IS) and epilepsy, the existence of a causal nexus and its directionality remains a topic of controversy.
UNASSIGNED: The single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) associated with IS were extracted from the Genome-Wide Association Study (GWAS) database. Pooled genetic data encompassing all epilepsy cases, as well as generalized and focal epilepsy subtypes, were acquired from the International League Against Epilepsy\'s GWAS study. In this study, the primary analysis approach utilized the inverse variance weighting (IVW) method as the main analytical technique. To enhance the robustness of the findings against potential pleiotropy, additional sensitivity analyses were conducted.
UNASSIGNED: In the forward analysis, the IVW method demonstrated that IS was associated with an increased risk of all epilepsy (odds ratio (OR) = 1.127, 95 % confidence interval (CI) = 1.038-1.224, P = 0.004) and generalized epilepsy (IVW: OR = 1.340, 95 % CI = 1.162-1.546, P = 5.70 × 10-5). There was no substantial causal relationship observed between IS and focal epilepsy (P > 0.05). Furthermore, generalized epilepsy, focal epilepsy, and all epilepsy did not show a causal relationship with IS.
UNASSIGNED: This Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis demonstrates that IS increases the risk of developing epilepsy, especially generalized epilepsy. Conversely, no clear causal association was found between epilepsy and the onset of stroke. Therefore, the possible mechanisms of the effect of epilepsy on the pathogenesis of IS still need to be further investigated.

Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies have provided conflicting evidence for the mood regulation tenet that people drink in response to positive and negative moods. The current study examined mood-to-alcohol relationships idiographically to quantify the prevalence and intensity of relationships between positive and negative moods and drinking across individuals.
We used two EMA samples: 96 heavy drinking college students (sample 1) and 19 young adults completing an ecological momentary intervention (EMI) for drinking to cope (sample 2). Mood and alcohol use were measured multiple times per day for 4-6 weeks. Mood-alcohol relationships were examined using three different analytic approaches: standard multilevel modeling, group causal modeling, and idiographic causal modeling.
Both multilevel modeling and group causal modeling showed that participants in both samples drank in response to positive moods only. However, idiographic causal analyses revealed that only 63% and 21% of subjects (in samples 1 and 2, respectively) drank following any positive mood. Many subjects (24% and 58%) did not drink in response to either positive or negative mood in their daily lives, and very few (5% and 16%) drank in response to negative moods throughout the EMA protocol, despite sample 2 being selected specifically because they endorse drinking to cope with negative mood.
Traditional group-level analyses and corresponding population-wide theories assume relative homogeneity within populations in mood-alcohol relationships, but this nomothetic approach failed to characterize accurately the relationship between mood and alcohol use in approximately half of the subjects in two samples that were demographically and clinically homogeneous. Given inconsistent findings in the mood-alcohol relationships to date, we conclude that idiographic causal analyses can provide a foundation for more accurate theories of mood and alcohol use. In addition, idiographic causal models may also help improve psychosocial treatments through direct use in clinical settings.