方法:前瞻性研究。
目的:评估术前评估的心身特征对术后疼痛的影响,残疾,和生活质量的结果。
背景:颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)是一种广泛使用的治疗颈椎病的手术方法。尽管有效,各种研究报告了在减轻残疾和疼痛方面的非成功率。在各种医学学科中,心理因素已越来越被认为是手术结果的关键决定因素。它们在ACDF背景下的影响的全部程度仍未充分探索。本系列病例旨在评估术前心理分析对长期疼痛的影响。残疾和生活质量结果。
方法:我们进行了一项前瞻性队列研究,前瞻性收集了从2019年7月至2021年11月接受PEEK间固定笼ACDF的76例连续患者的数据。使用症状自评量表90(SCL-90)问卷评估术前心理特征。Oswestry残疾指数(ODI),视觉模拟量表(VAS),颈部残疾指数(NDI)EuroQol-5D(EQ-5D),术前收集短表36(SF-36),术后一个月,手术后至少一年.
结果:相关分析显示心身特质与多种术前和术后预后指标之间存在关联。单变量分析和线性回归分析证明了全球严重程度指数(GSI)对ODI最终随访分数的影响,VAS,NDI,EQ-5D,SF-36GSI始终表现出与最终随访疼痛的更强相关性,残疾,和生活质量结果相对于相应的术前值。
结论:本研究强调了心身性状作为ACDF结局的预测因素的重要性,并强调了其在术前评估中的相关性,以告知患者现实的期望。这些发现强调了在术前检查中需要考虑心理因素,为研究药物和心理治疗开辟道路。认识到心理社会因素的影响为治疗策略提供了信息,培养量身定制的手术方法和病人护理。
METHODS: Prospective study.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the influence of preoperatively assessed psychosomatic traits on postoperative pain, disability, and quality of life outcomes.
BACKGROUND: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a widely employed surgical procedure for treating cervical spondylosis. Despite its effectiveness, various studies have reported non-success rates in terms of alleviating disability and pain. Psychological factors have become increasingly recognized as critical determinants of surgical outcomes in various medical disciplines. The full extent of their impact within the context of ACDF remains insufficiently explored. This case series aims to assess the influence of preoperative psychological profiling on long-term pain, disability and quality of life outcomes.
METHODS: We conducted a prospective cohort study of prospectively collected data from 76 consecutive patients who underwent ACDF with PEEK inter-fixed cages from July 2019 to November 2021. The preoperative psychological traits were assessed using the Symptom Checklist 90 (SCL-90) questionnaire. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Neck Disability index (NDI), EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D), and Short Form-36 (SF-36) were collected preoperatively, one month postoperatively, and at least one year after the surgical procedure.
RESULTS: The correlation analyses revealed associations between psychosomatic traits and multiple preoperative and postoperative outcome measures. The univariate analyses and linear regression analyses demonstrated the influence of the Global Severity Index (GSI) over the final follow-up scores for the ODI, VAS, NDI, EQ-5D, and SF-36. The GSI consistently exhibited a stronger correlation with the final follow-up pain, disability, and quality of life outcomes with respect to the correspondent preoperative values.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of psychosomatic traits as predictive factors for ACDF outcomes and emphasizes their relevance in preoperative assessment for informing patients about realistic expectations. The findings underscore the need to consider psychological profiles in the preoperative workup, opening avenues for research into medications and psychological therapies. Recognizing the influence of psychosocial elements informs treatment strategies, fostering tailored surgical approaches and patient care.