OBJECTIVE: To compare the graft success rates and hearing outcomes of underlay myringoplasty with or without perichondrium tucking of the attached perichondrium, graft perforation margins when repairing chronic large central dry perforations.
METHODS: Randomized controlled trial.
METHODS: Chronic large central dry perforations were prospectively randomized to tucking perichondrium graft underlay (TPGU) and no-tucking perichondrium graft underlay (NTPG) groups. The graft outcomes and complications were compared between the two groups at 12 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: In total, 61 patients with large central dry perforations were included. All patients completed 12-month follow-ups. Residual perforations occurred in 0.0 % of the TPGU group and in 12.9 % of the NTPG group (P = 0.129), and re-perforations occurred within 6 months in 0.0 % and 3.2 % of the two groups, respectively (P = 0.987). The graft success rates were 100.0 % (30/30) and 83.9 % (26/31) (P = 0.067). No significant between-group differences were observed in terms of preoperative (P = 0.547) or postoperative (P = 0.612) air bone gaps (ABGs) or mean ABG gains (P = 0.597). No graft-related complications were observed in either group during follow-up. No patients exhibited significant graft blunting or medialization; graft lateralization was noted in one patient of the NTPG group.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic cartilage with tucking of the attached perichondrium perforation margins during underlay myringoplasty may improve the graft success rate compared to that of the cartilage push-through technique when repairing large central dry perforations; however, the hearing improvements were comparable in the two groups.

BACKGROUND: Correction of asymmetry and irregularity deformities with autologous grafts, without osteotomies, offers advantages to both plastic surgeons and patients with severe deviation. Various autologous tissues such as fat, bone, and cartilage grafts are viable options for this purpose.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of 3 autologous filling materials in patients with bone asymmetry.
METHODS: A retrospective evaluation was conducted on 297 patients seeking aesthetic nose surgery between 2015 and 2022. Only primary patients without prior surgery and those with bone asymmetry from trauma, with dorsum protrusion <3 mm, and without osteotomy were included. Patients were divided into fat, cartilage, and bone groups. Grafts were applied to the concave side during closed rhinoplasty, and evaluations were done 12 months after surgery by blinded plastic surgeons and patients using established assessment tools.
RESULTS: Fat, cartilage, and bone grafts were utilized in 74, 127, and 96 patients, respectively, with a mean follow-up of 19 months. The mean graft volumes were 1.0 cc (bone), 1.3 cc (cartilage), and 1.6 cc (fat). The patient self-assessment scores were 75%, 84.9%, and 86.6%, respectively. The Asher-McDade averages were 77.2%, 86.7%, and 88.4%, respectively. Cartilage and bone graft results were statistically similar in patients\' self-evaluation and significantly higher than those of fat grafts. Blinded assessments showed no significant difference between the cartilage and bone groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Placing autologous grafts on the concave side for patients with minimal nasal bone protrusion (<3 mm) yields successful results. Cartilage grafts offer advantages in volume, result estimation, and preparation time, making them suitable for larger patient cohorts.

BACKGROUND: Facial balance significantly impacts aesthetics, particularly in the middle and lower thirds. Patients with chin retrusion often benefit from sagittal plane chin advancement in rhinoplasty, enhancing surgical outcomes and satisfaction.
OBJECTIVE: This article presents a method for analyzing chin deformities and discusses a hybrid treatment approach to harmonize facial features, complementing rhinoplasty.
METHODS: The chin positions of patients treated by the senior author were assessed. A retrospective analysis included 49 patients with chin retrusion of 2.5-6 mm. Among them, 22 patients initially offered chin implants declined, leading to planned chin augmentation. Fat grafting was exclusively performed for 20 patients lacking sufficient cartilage. The \"Hybrid Chin Advancement\" technique involved supporting tissues beneath muscles with nasal septum cartilage and fat injections and tissues above muscles with fat injection alone.
RESULTS: Pre- and postoperative Legan angle measurements and chin advancements were compared across three groups. While preoperative Legan angles were statistically similar, postoperative Legan angles and advancement changes were significantly higher in the implant group (p < 0.0001). Comparing hybrid chin advancement and fat grafting groups, postoperative Legan angles and advancement changes were significantly higher in the hybrid chin group (p < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Fat grafting suffices for mild advancements (~ 2 mm), while the hybrid chin method is effective for moderate advancements (~ 4 mm). For advancements exceeding 6 mm, implants or osseous genioplasty are optimal. Our study\'s hybrid approach offers an easy, safe, and reliable method for achieving facial harmony in the lower two-thirds without compromising patient expectations.
METHODS: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

OBJECTIVE: To describe the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent surgical repair through an anterior approach that involved interposition a posterior cartilage for Type III or Type IV laryngotracheoesophageal cleft (LTEC).
METHODS: A chart view was performed on patients with Type III or Type IV LTEC between May 2017 and May 2022. Demographic features and surgical outcomes were collected and analyzed.
RESULTS: Seven patients were finally included. Five patients were diagnosed with Type III LTEC and two patients were diagnosed with Type IV LTEC. All but one patients survived and thrived. Four patients were able to successfully extubate with acceptable voice, and two patients were tracheostomized. Five patients were deemed safe for all consistencies food and one was safe for thickened food. After a mean follow-up of 49 months (18-83 months), neither complications nor recurrences were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: An anterior laryngofissure approach to the cleft repair with a posterior cartilage grafting is an effective and safe treatment for Type III or IV LTEC, which enables closure of LTEC and reconstruction of cricoid plate in order to avoid tracheoesophageal fistula formation or subglottic stenosis postoperatively. Severe tracheomalacia and GERD are two main causes for surgical failure.

OBJECTIVE: Trimming of perforation margins and external auditory canal (EAC) packing are basic procedures in underlay myringoplasty for repairing chronic perforations. The objective of this study was to compare the operation time, graft outcome, hearing improvement, and complications of endoscopic cartilage underlay myringoplasty with and without trimming of perforation margins and EAC packing in children.
METHODS: Prospective, randomized study.
METHODS: Tertiary referral center.
METHODS: Pediatric patients older than 12 years with chronic perforations were randomly divided into two groups: myringoplasty with trimming of perforation margin and EAC packing (TPME) group or no trimming of perforation margin and EAC packing (NTPME) group. The operation time, graft success rate, hearing improvement, and complications were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: Fifty-two patients were ultimately included in the study. The mean operation time was 31.4 ± 4.2 min in the TPME group and 23.6 ± 1.7 min in the NTPME group; the difference was significant (P < 0.01). The rate of aural fullness significantly differed between the TPME and NTPME groups (P = 0.000). All participants were followed up for 12 months; the graft success rate did not significantly differ between the groups (88.5% vs. 96.2%; P = 0.603). No patients developed adhesive otitis media. Between the preoperative and postoperative measurements, the mean air-bone gap improved by 10.2 ± 2.8 dB in the TPME group and 11.6 ± 0.7 dB in the NTPME group; this was significant (P < 0.001) in both groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic cartilage underlay myringoplasty NTPME shorted the operation time and avoided aural fullness and EAC discomfort compared with the TPME technique; however, graft success and hearing improvement were comparable between the two techniques for repairing large perforations in children.

Objective: The objective of this study was to endoscopically evaluate the graft healing process and graft success rate following cartilage myringoplasty, without trimming of the perforation margin or external ear canal (EAC) packing. Material and Methods: Patients with chronic tympanic membrane (TM) perforation underwent endoscope cartilage underlay myringoplasty, without trimming perforation margin or EAC packing. The healing process of the cartilage graft and the graft success rate were evaluated at 6 months postoperatively. Results: Fifty-eight ears were included in this study. At 1 week postoperatively, clinical inosculation and neovascularization of the graft were observed in small- and medium-sized perforations, but not in large or subtotal perforations. At 2 weeks postoperatively, graft clinical inosculation and neovascularization were completed in the small- and medium-sized perforations; however, neovascularization of the graft had only just begun in the large perforations. At 3 weeks postoperatively, completion of the graft clinical inosculation was achieved in 57 of the 58 ears. At 4 weeks postoperatively, complete neovascularization was achieved in all perforations. Of the 58 ears, postoperative infection resulted in residual perforation in 1 ear, and an insufficient graft resulted in residual perforation in a large perforation without infection. Overall, the graft success rate was 96.6% (56/58). There was no correlation between the graft success rate and graft neovascularization score. Conclusions: The graft healing process experienced the dilation of the blood vessels of the remnant TM, graft clinical inosculation, and neovascularization following cartilage myringoplasty without trimming of the perforation margin and EAC packing; however, the graft success rate was not related to the endoscopic graft neovascularization scores.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the factors that affect graft healing after laryngotracheal reconstruction (LTR).
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review at King Abdulaziz University Hospital, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, between January-2008 and October-2023. We included all patients who underwent LTR and required anterior and/or posterior graft placement, while those who underwent procedures without graft placement and those with incomplete information were excluded.
RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were analyzed. Most patients were pediatric (65.3%), male (65.3%), had no coexisting comorbidities (55.1%), and harbored grade 3-4 stenosis (59.2%). Thirty patients (61.2%) underwent open surgery. Various graft complications occurred including infection (n = 1, 2%), dehiscence (n = 3, 6.1%), scar (n = 6, 12.2%), and granulation (n = 29, 59.2%). Only 15 patients (30.65%) achieved the composite status of \"healthy\" graft. Among 43 patients who had postoperative cultures, positive results for Pseudomonas aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus were observed in 10 and four patients, respectively. Open surgery and double-stage procedure were significantly associated with higher rates of granulation tissue formation. Pediatric-age group had significantly higher rate of complete epithelization compared to adult-age group. A significantly greater proportion of patients who had unhealthy grafts had open surgery. The rate of double-stage LTR was significantly higher in unhealthy grafts compared to healthy grafts. Prolonged stent duration was linked to various graft-related complications. Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed no statistically significant correlations between various factors and postoperative graft-related complications.
CONCLUSIONS: Open surgery, double-stage procedure, pediatric age group, and stent duration were not significant risk factors associated with postoperative graft-related complications during LTR in multivariate analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this project was to develop and validate a patient-specific, anatomically correct graft for cartilage restoration using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data and 3-dimensional (3D) printing technology. The specific aim was to test the accuracy of a novel method for 3D printing and implanting individualized, anatomically shaped bio-scaffolds to treat cartilage defects in a human cadaveric model. We hypothesized that an individualized, anatomic 3D-printed scaffold designed from MRI data would provide a more optimal fill for a large cartilage defect compared to a generic flat scaffold.
METHODS: Four focal cartilage defects (FCDs) were created in paired human cadaver knees, age <40 years, in the weight-bearing surfaces of the medial femoral condyle (MFC), lateral femoral condyle (LFC), patella, and trochlea of each knee. MRIs were obtained, anatomic grafts were designed and 3D printed for the left knee as an experimental group, and generic flat grafts for the right knee as a control group. Grafts were implanted into corresponding defects and fixed using tissue adhesive. Repeat post-implant MRIs were obtained. Graft step-off was measured as the distance in mm between the surface of the graft and the native cartilage surface in a direction perpendicular to the subchondral bone. Graft contour was measured as the gap between the undersurface of the graft and the subchondral bone in a direction perpendicular to the joint surface.
RESULTS: Graft step-off was statistically significantly better for the anatomic grafts compared to the generic grafts in the MFC (0.0 ​± ​0.2 ​mm vs. 0.7 ​± ​0.5 ​mm, p ​< ​0.001), LFC (0.1 ​± ​0.3 ​mm vs. 1.0 ​± ​0.2 ​mm, p ​< ​0.001), patella (-0.2 ​± ​0.3 ​mm vs. -1.2 ​± ​0.4 ​mm, p ​< ​0.001), and trochlea (-0.4 ​± ​0.3 vs. 0.4 ​± ​0.7, p ​= ​0.003). Graft contour was statistically significantly better for the anatomic grafts in the LFC (0.0 ​± ​0.0 ​mm vs. 0.2 ​± ​0.4 ​mm, p ​= ​0.022) and trochlea (0.0 ​± ​0.0 ​mm vs. 1.4 ​± ​0.7 ​mm, p ​< ​0.001). The anatomic grafts had an observed maximum step-off of -0.9 ​mm and a maximum contour mismatch of 0.8 ​mm.
CONCLUSIONS: This study validates a process designed to fabricate anatomically accurate cartilage grafts using MRI and 3D printing technology. Anatomic grafts demonstrated superior fit compared to generic flat grafts.
METHODS: Level IV.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the graft success rate and hearing outcomes of the inside-out raising mucosal-tympanomeatal flap technique for the repair of large marginal perforations.
METHODS: Prospective case series.
METHODS: The study enrolled patients with large marginal perforations who underwent endoscopic cartilage myringoplasty with the inside-out raising mucosal-tympanomeatal flap technique. The graft success rate, hearing outcomes, and complications were evaluated at 12 months postoperatively.
RESULTS: In total, 48 patients with large marginal perforations were included. 81% of the population had large perforation, 14.6 had subtotal and total perforation was seen in 4.2%. The mean operation time was 38.6 ± 7.1 min. At 12 months postoperatively, the graft success rate was 89.6% (43/48). The mean air-bone gap was 25.6 ± 5.2 dB preoperatively and 16.5 ± 4.1 dB at 12 months postoperatively, with significant differences between these values (p = 0.001). The functional success rate was 85.4% (41/48). None of the patients experienced worsened sensorineural hearing loss or graft-related complications, such as graft lateralization, significant blunting, and graft medialization, during follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic cartilage-perichondrium myringoplasty for the repair of large marginal perforations using the inside-out raising mucosal-tympanomeatal flap technique was associated with satisfactory graft outcomes and minimal complications.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare the graft outcomes and complications of two endoscopic perichondrium-cartilage graft techniques for repairing large perforations.
METHODS: Single center blinded randomized controlled trial.
METHODS: 61 large perforations more than 50% of TM area were prospectively randomized to undergo the free perichondrium and free cartilage graft group (FPFC, n = 31) or perichondrium partial attachment the cartilage graft group (PPAC, n = 30). The primary outcome measures were the operation time; secondary outcome measures were the graft success rate and hearing gain at 12 months postoperatively and postoperative complications.
RESULTS: All patients completed follow-up of 12 months. The mean operation time was 38.2 ± 2.3 min in the FPFC group and 37.4 ± 5.6 min in the PPAC group (P = 0.658). At postoperative 3 months, the graft success rates were 96.7% in the FPFC group and 93.3% in the PPAC group (P = 0.976). At postoperative 12 months, the graft success rates were 96.7% in the FPFC group and 83.3% in the PPAC group (P = 0.182). However, the residual and re-perforation rate with no infection was 0.0% (0/31) in the FPFC group and 16.7% (5/30) in the PPAC group (P = 0.056). No significant between-group differences were observed pre- (P = 0.842) or post- (P = 0.759) operative air bone gap (ABG) values or mean ABG gain (P = 0.886). However, granular myringitis has been noted in 6.5% in the FPFC group and in 3.3% in the PPAC group.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that 12-month graft success and hearing gain were comparable between the perichondrium free and partial attachment the cartilage graft techniques, nevertheless, partial attachment technique could increase residual and re-perforations.