Carotid-cavernous fistula

颈动脉海绵窦瘘
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:颈动脉海绵窦瘘(CCF)是由于颈内动脉(ICA)或颈外动脉与海绵窦之间的异常连接而引起的公认实体。典型的CCF症状包括眼球突出,化疗,眼眶杂音,头痛,面部疼痛,和颅神经(CN)麻痹。虽然CCF最常见于创伤后,它们也可以自发发生,继发于海绵样ICA动脉瘤破裂。很少,它们可以继发于异常持续性三叉神经动脉(PTA)动脉瘤的破裂。
    方法:这里,作者描述了一例54岁女性的病例,该女性因PTA动脉瘤破裂继发CCF而出现CNVI麻痹和头痛.最终通过动脉瘤和母体PTA血管的线圈栓塞治疗CCF。
    结论:尽管这种情况很少见,临床医生应警惕评估CCF患者是否存在PTA,作为PTA相关的CCF需要独特的治疗考虑。在某些情况下,PTA在后循环供应中起着至关重要的作用,母血管PTA的保存是至关重要的。然而,在存在足够的后循环侧支供应的情况下,动脉瘤和母体血管PTA的栓塞是瘘管闭合的合理治疗选择。https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24287.
    BACKGROUND: A carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF) is a well-recognized entity resulting from an abnormal connection between the internal carotid artery (ICA) or external carotid artery and the cavernous sinus. Typical CCF symptomology includes proptosis, chemosis, orbital bruit, headache, facial pain, and cranial nerve (CN) palsies. While CCFs most often occur posttraumatically, they can also occur spontaneously, secondary to cavernous ICA aneurysm rupture. Very rarely, they can occur secondary to the rupture of an anomalous persistent trigeminal artery (PTA) aneurysm.
    METHODS: Herein, the authors describe the case of a 54-year-old woman who presented with a CN VI palsy and headache due to a CCF secondary to a PTA aneurysm rupture. The CCF was ultimately treated via coil embolization of the aneurysm and the parent PTA vessel.
    CONCLUSIONS: Though such occurrences are rare, clinicians should be vigilant in assessing for the presence of a PTA in patients with a CCF, as a PTA-associated CCF requires unique treatment considerations. In some cases where the PTA plays a crucial role in the posterior circulation supply, preservation of the parent vessel PTA is crucial. However, in cases in which an adequate posterior circulation collateral supply exists, embolization of the aneurysm and the parent vessel PTA is a reasonable treatment option for fistula closure. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24287.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:一名49岁有高血压病史的女性因右眼发红而就诊于急诊科,突增,轨道丰满度,模糊的视觉。她最初被诊断出患有眼眶假瘤,在服用类固醇的过程中症状恶化。计算机断层扫描血管造影引起了对颈动脉海绵窦瘘(CCF)的关注,随后通过数字减影血管造影证实。
    方法:她通过上颌内动脉和下眼静脉(IOV)进行了瘘管线圈栓塞。在2个月的随访中,她报告说复视完全消退,轨道丰满度,和突起。眼科检查显示双侧视野正常。
    结论:CCF栓塞很少通过IOV进行,文献中只有5例报告病例。这种情况表明,如果解剖结构优于上眼静脉,则可以轻松执行该程序。以良好的美容效果为例。https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24183.
    BACKGROUND: A 49-year-old woman with a history of hypertension presented to the emergency department with right eye redness, proptosis, orbital fullness, and blurry vision. She had initially been diagnosed with an orbital pseudotumor, and the symptoms worsened over a course of steroids. Computed tomography angiography raised concern for a carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF), which was subsequently confirmed by digital subtraction angiography.
    METHODS: She underwent fistula coil embolization via the internal maxillary artery and inferior ophthalmic vein (IOV). At the 2-month follow-up, she reported complete resolution of diplopia, orbital fullness, and proptosis. An ophthalmology examination revealed normal visual fields bilaterally.
    CONCLUSIONS: CCF embolization is rarely performed through the IOV, with only 5 reported cases in the literature. This case demonstrates that the procedure can be easily performed if the anatomy is favorable over the superior ophthalmic vein, with the illustration of good cosmetic outcomes. https://thejns.org/doi/10.3171/CASE24183.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:硬脑膜颈动脉海绵窦瘘(dCCFs),也被称为间接颈动脉海绵窦瘘,代表海绵窦内动脉和静脉系统之间的异常连接,通常通过血管内途径治疗。我们旨在基于血管内治疗方法研究dCCF患者的临床特征,并评估血管造影和临床结果。
    方法:对文献进行了系统综述。数据包括患者数量,人口统计,出现临床症状,瘘的病因,巴罗分类,收集和评估栓塞材料。收集的结果指标包括瘘管闭塞程度,术后症状,并发症,和平均随访时间。
    结果:共纳入52项研究,检查了治疗dCCF的四种主要血管内途径:经动脉,经股动脉-经静脉(经骨或其他),经眶(经皮或经切),和直接面面接触。总体数据来自736例817dCCF患者。与通过岩下窦的经静脉技术(88.1%)相比,经动脉入路的dCCF闭塞率较低(75.6%)。通过直接穿刺或手术切除的经眶入路为海绵窦提供了更直接的路径,尽管有更大的并发症,包括眼眶血肿的风险。直接经面静脉入路,虽然有限,显示高达100%的闭塞率和最小的并发症。
    结论:我们对dCCF的四种主要血管内途径进行了全面综述。总之,dCCF的现有血管内治疗方案已得到扩展,并提供了具有普遍良好结果的有效解决方案.虽然方法的选择取决于个体患者因素和技术可用性,传统的经静脉手术已成为一线血管内治疗.有成长,关于直接经眶和经面入路的有利文献;然而,需要更多的研究直接比较这些一般的经静脉治疗方案,以完善治疗策略.
    BACKGROUND: Dural carotid-cavernous fistulas (dCCFs), also known as indirect carotid-cavernous fistulas, represent abnormal connections between the arterial and venous systems within the cavernous sinus that are typically treated via endovascular approach. We aim to investigate the clinical characteristics of patients with dCCFs based on the endovascular treatment approach and assess angiographic and clinical outcomes.
    METHODS: A systematic review of the literature was performed. Data including number of patients, demographics, presenting clinical symptoms, etiology of fistula, Barrow classification, and embolization material were collected and evaluated. Outcome measures collected included degree of fistula occlusion, postoperative symptoms, complications, and mean follow-up time.
    RESULTS: A total of 52 studies were included examining four primary endovascular approaches for treating dCCFs: transarterial, transfemoral-transvenous (transpetrosal or other), transorbital (percutaneous or via cutdown), and direct transfacial access. Overall data was collected from 736 patients with 817 dCCFs. Transarterial approaches exhibit lower dCCF occlusion rates (75.6%) compared to transvenous techniques via the inferior petrosal sinus (88.1%). The transorbital approach via direct puncture or surgical cutdown offers a more direct path to the cavernous sinus, although with greater complications including risk of orbital hematoma. The direct transfacial vein approach, though limited, shows up to 100% occlusion rates and minimal complications.
    CONCLUSIONS: We provide a comprehensive review of four main endovascular approaches for dCCFs. In summary, available endovascular treatment options for dCCFs have expanded and provide effective solutions with generally favorable outcomes. While the choice of approach depends on individual patient factors and technique availability, traditional transvenous procedures have emerged as the first-line endovascular treatment. There is growing, favorable literature on direct transorbital and transfacial approaches; however, more studies directly comparing these general transvenous options are necessary to refine treatment strategies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    颈动脉海绵窦瘘(CCF)是颈动脉与海绵窦之间的异常连通,最常见的原因是外伤.由于其高流动性和积极的临床过程,CCF的自发分辨率是罕见的,使血管内栓塞是必要的。该手术旨在防止潜在的视力丧失,强调及时干预对保持视功能的重要性。我们报告了一例巴罗A型颈动脉海绵窦瘘,可自发解决。一名42岁的男性在入院前3天因癫痫发作而被转诊至急诊室。癫痫发作既手臂僵硬又抽搐,眼睛向上凝视着,咬过舌头,泡沫的嘴,没有尿床。同时,患者在癫痫发作期间和之后失去知觉。关于病史,病人8个月前因交通事故头部外伤。此外,病人报告有红肿的症状,肿胀,双重视觉,无法直视右眼.最初进行脑血管造影,报告巴罗A型颈动脉海绵窦瘘,无法进行进一步的血管内治疗,但是一年后进行了第二次脑血管造影,显示BarrowA型颈动脉海绵窦瘘的自发性血栓形成。变成类型A,B,C,和D.有人提出,CCFBarrowA型的自发消退可能是海绵窦血栓形成所致。
    Carotid cavernous fistula (CCF) is an abnormal communication between the carotid artery and the cavernous sinus, which is most commonly caused by trauma. Due to its high-flow nature and aggressive clinical course, spontaneous resolution of CCF is rare, making endovascular embolization necessary. This procedure aims to prevent potential vision loss, emphasizing the importance of timely intervention to preserve visual function. We report a case of Barrow type A carotid-cavernous fistula which resolved spontaneously. A 42-year-old male was referred to Emergency Room with a chief complaint of seizure 3 days before admission. The seizure was both arm stiff and jerking, the eyes gazing upward, bitten tongue, foamy mouth, no bed wetting. Meanwhile, the patient was unconscious during and after the seizure. Regarding the medical history, the patient experienced head trauma 8 months ago due to a traffic accident. Additionally, the patient reported symptoms of redness, swelling, double vision, and inability to look to the right eye. Initial cerebral angiography was performed, reporting a carotid-cavernous fistula of Barrow type A. Further endovascular treatment could not be carried out, but a second cerebral angiography was conducted after a year, demonstrating spontaneous thrombosis of the carotid-cavernous fistula of Barrow type A. CCF were classified by Barrow et al. into types A, B, C, and D. It has been proposed that spontaneous resolution of CCF Barrow type A may result from thrombosis of the cavernous sinus.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    颈动脉海绵窦瘘(CCF)是一种罕见的疾病。然而,当出现创伤性面部骨折时应该怀疑,因为如果没有诊断,它会导致永久性损害,如失明。外伤性CCF通常会出现延迟症状,不及时治疗的延迟诊断会导致视神经和颅神经的永久性损伤。IV,V,和VI以及颅内出血。疑似面部骨折患者的常规初始治疗方式是非对比计算机断层扫描(CT),以确定任何骨折线并检查颅内出血。我们报告了一个创伤后CCF病例,症状延迟4天,在常规非对比性面部CT上观察到左眼上静脉(SOV)增大,并伴有同侧眶壁骨折。当患者首次出现在急诊室(ER)时,我们在CT上没有发现静脉扩大。之后,患者出现CCF的延迟症状,并再次接受ER治疗.当我们重新分析第一次CT扫描时,扩大的SOV被证实。诊断通过磁共振血管造影证实,该患者成功接受了瘘管栓塞治疗。因此,对于颅面外伤损伤患者,我们建议复查通过非对比CT容易识别的眼静脉扩大,以在初次就诊时怀疑存在延迟的CCF.
    Carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF) is a rare condition. However, it should be suspected when there are traumatic facial fractures, because if not diagnosed, it can lead to permanent damage such as blindness. Traumatic CCF often presents delayed symptoms, and delayed diagnosis without prompt treatment can lead to permanent injuries in optic and cranial nerves III, IV, V, and VI as well as intracranial hemorrhage. The routine initial modality for patients with suspected facial bone fractures is noncontrast computed tomography (CT) to identify any fracture lines and check for intracranial hemorrhage. We report a post-traumatic CCF case with a 4-day symptom delay, where left superior ophthalmic vein (SOV) enlargement was observed on the routine noncontrast facial CT with ipsilateral orbital wall fracture. When the patient first presented to the emergency room (ER), we did not detect vein enlargement on CT. Afterwards, the patient developed delayed symptoms of CCF and was readmitted to the ER. When we reanalyzed the first CT scan, an enlarged SOV was confirmed. The diagnosis was confirmed via magnetic resonance imaging angiography, and the patient was successfully treated with embolization of the fistula. Thus, we recommend reviewing ophthalmic vein enlargement that is readily identifiable through noncontrast CT for patients injured by craniofacial trauma to suspect the presence of delayed CCF at their initial presentation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    直接颈动脉海绵窦瘘(CCF)主要由头部创伤引起。一些病例还归因于血管内手术期间的医源性损伤。然而,与直接CCF相关的功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)的报道极为罕见.
    方法:一名52岁的男性工人,患有慢性鼻窦炎并接受了由耳鼻喉科医师进行的功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术(FESS)。术中发现左侧蝶窦壁损伤,无颈内动脉出血,用粘膜和组织胶修复。出院后一个月,他开始出现耳鸣,他的左眼头痛和肿胀。脑血管造影显示左侧有直接颈动脉海绵窦瘘(CCF)。患者接受了使用可拆卸线圈和Onyx的经动脉和经静脉支架辅助线圈,缓解了他的症状.
    FESS后的海绵状颈动脉瘘是Karaman等人首次报道的极为罕见的病例。2009年。在FESS或鼻内镜手术(EES)期间,颈内动脉损伤的发生率估计在0至0.1%之间。目前,FESS后颈动脉海绵窦瘘(CCF)的发生尚无明确的解释.先前的研究表明,诸如经蝶窦手术和EES之类的程序可以在颈内动脉中诱发假性动脉瘤。如果海绵状假性动脉瘤破裂,这可能导致CCF的形成。
    结论:功能性内窥镜鼻窦手术后的直接海绵状颈动脉瘘非常罕见。因此,当遇到颈动脉海绵窦瘘患者时,应该考虑相关的程序历史。
    UNASSIGNED: Direct carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCF) are primarily caused by head trauma. Some cases have also been attributed to iatrogenic injuries during endovascular procedures. However, the reports of functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) associated with direct CCFs are extremely rare.
    METHODS: A 52-year-old male worker, who suffered from chronic sinusitis and underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) performed by an otolaryngologist. Intra-operative finding indicated a left sphenoid sinus wall injury without internal carotid artery bleeding, which was repaired using mucosa and tissue glue. One month after discharge, he began experiencing tinnitus, headache and swelling in his left eye. Cerebral angiography revealed a direct carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF) on the left side. The patient underwent transarterial and transvenous stent-assisted coiling using detachable coils and Onyx, which alleviated his symptoms.
    UNASSIGNED: A cavernous-carotid fistula following FESS is an exceedingly rare occurrence first reported by Karaman et al. in 2009. The incidence of internal carotid artery injury during FESS or endonasal endoscopic surgery (EES) is estimated to be between 0 and 0.1 %. Currently, there is no definitive explanation for the development of a carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF) post-FESS. Previous studies suggest that procedures like transsphenoidal surgery and EES can induce pseudoaneurysms in the internal carotid artery. If the cavernous pseudoaneurysm ruptures, it could lead to the formation of a CCF.
    CONCLUSIONS: A direct cavernous-carotid fistula following functional endoscopic sinus surgery is a very rare. Consequently, when encountering patients with a carotid-cavernous fistula, relevant procedure history should be considered.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    我们报告了一名男性患者,其持续性原始三叉神经动脉变异动脉瘤破裂,导致海绵窦瘘。他表现为左结膜充血和眼球突出。脑血管造影显示左侧直接颈动脉海绵窦瘘;然而,球囊闭塞试验确定来源实际上是位于持续性原始三叉神经动脉主干上的破裂动脉瘤。对持续性原始三叉神经动脉进行血管内捕获,导致瘘管闭塞和症状缓解。
    We report a male patient with a ruptured persistent primitive trigeminal artery variant aneurysm that resulted in a fistula with the cavernous sinus. He presented with left conjunctival hyperemia and exophthalmos. Cerebral angiography revealed a left direct carotid-cavernous fistula; however, a balloon occlusion test determined that the source was actually a ruptured aneurysm located on the trunk of a persistent primitive trigeminal artery. Endovascular trapping of the persistent primitive trigeminal artery was performed, which resulted in fistula occlusion and symptom resolution.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:颈动脉海绵窦瘘(CCF)是海绵窦的复杂动静脉分流性病变,临床表现多样。本研究旨在分析临床结果,并区分接受保守观察的患者与需要血管内介入治疗的患者。
    方法:对2000年至2022年84例经血管造影证实的CCF患者进行回顾性分析。血管内治疗决定是由神经干预学家自行决定的。收集临床和血管造影数据,包括BarrowCCF分类和治疗结果。
    结果:与接受血管内栓塞治疗的患者(n=67)相比,保守治疗的患者(n=17)症状持续时间更长(165比42天),间接CCF更多(100%比68%)。高危临床症状,包括突起,复视,视力下降,和化学,在栓塞组中更为常见。皮质静脉反流和眼静脉反流在栓塞组中更为普遍(39%和91%,分别)。总的来说,31%的栓塞CCF需要再治疗,主要是BarrowD型病变(65%)。经静脉线圈栓塞是使用的主要技术(78%),其次是支线动脉栓塞(16%),颈内动脉分流术(8%)。
    结论:在没有高危症状或血管造影特征的特定CCF患者中,保守观察是一种安全有效的血管内栓塞治疗方法.高危症状和血管造影特征有利于血管内介入治疗。并发症很少见,大多数是短暂的,强调腔内管理的安全性。纵向血管造影和眼科监测对于监测瘘管的持久性或复发至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Carotid-cavernous fistulas (CCFs) are complex arteriovenous shunting lesions of the cavernous sinus with diverse clinical presentations. This study aimed to analyze clinical outcomes and differentiate patients treated with conservative observation versus those needing endovascular intervention.
    METHODS: A retrospective analysis of 84 patients with angiographically confirmed CCF was conducted from 2000 to 2022. Endovascular treatment decisions were made at the discretion of neurointerventionalists. Clinical and angiographic data were collected, including Barrow CCF classification and treatment outcomes.
    RESULTS: Patients managed conservatively (n = 17) had longer symptom duration (165 vs 42 days) and more indirect CCF (100% vs 68%) compared to those treated with endovascular embolization (n = 67). High-risk clinical symptoms, including proptosis, diplopia, decreased visual acuity, and chemosis, were more common in the embolization group. Cortical venous reflux and ophthalmic venous reflux were more prevalent in the embolization group (39% and 91%, respectively). Overall, 31% of embolized CCFs required retreatment, mainly Barrow type D lesions (65%). Transvenous coil embolization was the primary technique used (78%), followed by feeder artery embolization (16%), and internal carotid artery flow diversion (8%).
    CONCLUSIONS: In selected CCF patients without high-risk symptoms or angiographic features, conservative observation is a safe and effective alternative to endovascular embolization. High-risk symptoms and angiographic features favor endovascular intervention. Complications were rare, and most were transient, emphasizing the safety of endovascular management. Longitudinal angiographic and ophthalmologic surveillance is essential for monitoring fistula persistence or recurrence.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:自发性直接颈动脉海绵窦瘘(CCF)通常由破裂的颈动脉海绵状动脉瘤引起。我们在高容量三级转诊中心的单中心队列中研究了自发性直接CCF的治疗。报告解剖细节,治疗的技术方法,和结果。
    方法:回顾性分析2010-2022年间接受MRI和/或DSA成像随访的自发性直接CCF成人患者。我们研究了年龄,性别,临床表现,血管造影结果,治疗技术,结果,和并发症。
    结果:在80例CCF患者中,12例患者在13个疗程中接受了非创伤性直接CCF治疗(15%).中位年龄为65岁。两名患者患有潜在的结缔组织疾病。在10个案例中,直接CCF是由破裂的海绵样颈动脉动脉瘤引起的.直接CCF经血管内动脉栓塞治疗(10例),经静脉栓塞(1例),或手术(1例)。10例患者可以选择性关闭分流。两名患者接受了母体血管闭塞治疗(PVO;一名血管内;一名手术,带旁路)。并发症发生在2/12患者(17%),2例(17%)患者的永久性发病率:PVO后的三叉神经痛和手术PVO和旁路手术后的新梗死。CCF的选择性闭合没有导致发病。我们的系列中没有死亡率。
    结论:在大多数情况下,自发性直接CCF是由海绵样颈动脉动脉瘤破裂引起的。选择性关闭分流管,通常在动脉上使用线圈是可行的,取得了良好的效果。重建血管内技术是优选的,以最大程度地减少与治疗相关的神经系统并发症。
    OBJECTIVE: Spontaneous direct carotid-cavernous fistula (CCF) are usually caused by a ruptured carotid cavernous aneurysm. We studied treatment of spontaneous direct CCFs in a single-center cohort of a high-volume tertiary referral center, reporting anatomical details, technical approaches of treatment, and outcomes.
    METHODS: Adult patients with a spontaneous direct CCF treated between 2010-2022 with follow-up MRI and/or DSA imaging available were retrospectively analyzed. We studied age, sex, clinical presentation, angiographic findings, treatment techniques, outcomes, and complications.
    RESULTS: Out of 80 patients with CCFs, twelve patients were treated for a non-traumatic direct CCF (15%) in 13 sessions. Median age was 65 years. Two patients had an underlying connective tissue disorder. In 10 cases, the direct CCF was caused by a ruptured cavernous carotid aneurysm. The direct CCFs were treated by endovascular transarterial embolization (10 cases), transvenous embolization (1 case), or surgery (1 case). Selective closure of the shunt was possible in 10 patients. Two patients were treated with parent vessel occlusion (PVO; one endovascular; one surgical, with bypass). Complications occurred in 2 / 12 patients (17%), with permanent morbidity in two patients (17%): trigeminal neuralgia after PVO and new infarct after surgical PVO and bypass. Selective closure of CCF resulted in no morbidity. There was no mortality in our series.
    CONCLUSIONS: Spontaneous direct CCFs are caused by rupture of a cavernous carotid aneurysm in most cases. Selective closure of the shunt, usually feasible transarterially with coils, achieves good results. Reconstructive endovascular techniques are preferred to minimize treatment related neurological complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    描述在发展中国家的三级护理中心中,颈动脉海绵窦瘘(CCF)的临床表现和血管内球囊栓塞的结果。
    该回顾性介入病例系列包括2019年至2022年在拉合尔拉合尔综合医院接受血管内球囊栓塞的18例患者,巴基斯坦。分析的数据包括年龄,性别,CCF的原因和类型,临床表现,使用的诊断技术,干预,以及两个月的随访结果。排除记录不完整和线圈栓塞的患者。所有病例均进行数字减影血管造影,然后进行动脉内球囊栓塞。手术在全身麻醉下经股动脉入路进行。在所有情况下,单个球囊足以闭合瘘管。
    有18例患者符合纳入标准。16例患者有直接CCF,患者的平均年龄为27.2±12.6岁。创伤后平均就诊时间为7.89±7.19个月。男女比例为8:1。8例患者术前视力低于6/60,6/60和6/18之间的7例患者,3例患者优于6/18。术前平均眼压为16.06±3.37mmHg,术后平均眼压为14.83±3.49mmHg(p=0.005)。15例患者(83.3%)血管内栓塞成功。一名患者因手术并发症而出现硬膜外血肿,后来被抽干了。没有与手术相关的死亡率。
    通过股动脉进行球囊栓塞是直接和间接CCF的有效技术。如果及时执行,它是安全和简单的,效果很好。
    To describe the clinical presentation of carotico-cavernous fistula (CCF) and outcomes of endovascular balloon embolization in a tertiary care center in a developing country.
    This retrospective interventional case series included 18 patients who underwent endovascular balloon embolization from 2019 to 2022 at Lahore General Hospital in Lahore, Pakistan. The analyzed data consisted of age, gender, cause and type of CCF, clinical presentation, diagnostic technique used, intervention, and the results of two-month follow-up. Patients with incomplete records and coil embolization were excluded. Digital subtraction angiography was done in all cases followed by endo-arterial balloon embolization. Procedures were carried out under general anesthesia via femoral artery approach. A single balloon was sufficient to close the fistula in all cases.
    There were 18 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Sixteen patients had direct CCF, and the mean age of the patients was 27.2±12.6 years. The commonest cause of CCF was trauma, and the mean time of presentation after trauma was 7.89±7.19 months. The male-to-female ratio was 8:1. Preoperative visual acuity was worse than 6/60 in 8 patients, between 6/60 and 6/18 in 7 patients, and better than 6/18 in 3 patients. The mean intraocular pressure was 16.06±3.37 mmHg preoperatively and 14.83±3.49 mmHg postoperatively (p=0.005). Endovascular embolization was successful in 15 patients (83.3%). One patient developed epidural hematoma as a complication of the procedure, which was drained later. There was no mortality related with the procedure.
    Balloon embolization via the femoral artery is an efficient technique in direct as well as indirect CCF. It is safe and simple with very good results if performed in a timely manner.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号