Carotid corrected flow time

  • 文章类型: Letter
    这项研究研究了不同的目标导向液体治疗类型如何影响机器人辅助腹腔镜妇科手术期间的低血压和液体输注。他们使用颈动脉校正流量时间(FTc)和潮气量刺激脉压变化(VtPPV)检查患者的容量状态和反应性。研究结果表明,各种液体治疗目标显着影响术中低血压和液体需求。然而,该研究仅采用单侧颈动脉超声评估,可能忽略左右颈动脉之间血流的生理或病理变化。这种方法选择引起了人们的关注,因为指南建议进行双边测量以进行更全面的评估。缺乏双边评估可能会影响研究的可靠性和可重复性。证明单侧测量方法的合理性对于验证临床发现至关重要。未来的研究应采用双侧颈动脉超声评估或为单侧测量提供详细的基本原理,以增强临床评估的鲁棒性和准确性。
    This study examined how different goal-directed fluid therapy types affected low blood pressure and fluid infusion during robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecological surgery. They used carotid corrected flow time (FTc) and tidal volume stimulation pulse pressure variation (VtPPV) to check the patient\'s volume status and responsiveness. The findings indicated that various fluid therapy targets significantly influence intraoperative hypotension and fluid requirements. However, the study exclusively employed unilateral carotid ultrasound assessments, potentially overlooking physiological or pathological variations in blood flow between the left and right carotid arteries. This methodological choice raises concerns as guidelines recommend bilateral measurements for a more comprehensive evaluation. The lack of bilateral assessments could affect the study\'s reliability and reproducibility. Justifying the unilateral measurement approach is essential for validating clinical findings. Future research should adopt bilateral carotid ultrasound assessments or provide a detailed rationale for unilateral measurements to enhance the robustness and accuracy of clinical evaluations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    接受胃肠道手术的患者通常会由于体积不足而在全身麻醉诱导后出现低血压。这项研究旨在评估颈动脉校正血流时间(FTc)指导的预补液是否可以减轻全身麻醉诱导后低血压。
    接受胃肠道肿瘤切除术的患者被分为常规治疗组(C组)或基于FTc的液体治疗组(F组)。在F组中,根据补液前颈动脉FTc值,将患者进一步分为A组(颈动脉FTc<340.7ms)和B组(颈动脉FTc≥340.7ms).A组患者在15分钟内接受250mL胶体(羟乙基淀粉-HES)的预补液,直到颈动脉FTc达到≥340.7ms,以抵消诱导前的低血容量。B组和C组患者在诱导前30分钟以6mL/kg/h的速率连续输注HES以补偿生理液体损失。所有患者接受围手术期背景输注3mL/kg/h复方氯化钠,根据平均动脉压(MAP)和心率(HR)优化输注速率。比较C组和F组诱导后低血压的发生率,以及A组和B组之间。
    与C组相比,F组诱导后低血压的发生率显着降低(26.4%vs.46.7%,分别为;p<0.001)。A组患者接受了更多的预补液,与B组相比,导致颈动脉FTc值增加更大(336.5±64.5vs.174.3±34.1ms,p=0.002)。然而,两组间补液前后颈动脉FTc值无显著差异.A组和B组全身麻醉诱导后低血压的发生率差异无统计学意义(22.9%vs.28.8%,p=0.535)。
    基于FTc的预补液可以有效减少胃肠手术患者出现容量不足的诱导后低血压的发生。
    https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=201481。
    UNASSIGNED: Patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery often experience hypotension following general anesthesia induction due to insufficient volume. This study aimed to assess whether pre-rehydration guided by carotid corrected flow time (FTc) could mitigate post-induction hypotension induced by general anesthesia.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients undergoing resection of gastrointestinal tumors were assigned to either the conventional treatment group (Group C) or the fluid treatment group based on FTc (Group F). Within Group F, patients were further divided into Group A (carotid FTc <340.7 ms) and Group B (carotid FTc ≥340.7 ms) based on pre-rehydration carotid FTc values. Group A patients received pre-rehydration with 250 mL of colloids (hydroxyethyl starch-HES) administered within 15 min until carotid FTc reached ≥340.7 ms to counteract hypovolemia prior to induction. Patients in Group B and Group C received a continuous HES infusion at a rate of 6 mL/kg/h 30 min before induction to compensate for physiological fluid loss. All patients received a perioperative background infusion of 3 mL/kg/h compound sodium chloride, with infusion rates optimized based on mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR). The incidence of post-induction hypotension was compared between Group C and Group F, as well as between Group A and Group B.
    UNASSIGNED: The incidence of hypotension after induction was significantly lower in Group F compared to Group C (26.4% vs. 46.7%, respectively; p < 0.001). Patients in Group A received significantly more pre-rehydration, leading to a greater increase in carotid FTc values compared to Group B (336.5 ± 64.5 vs. 174.3 ± 34.1 ms, p = 0.002). However, no significant difference in carotid FTc values after pre-rehydration was observed between the groups. There was no significant difference in the incidence of hypotension after general anesthesia induction between Group A and Group B (22.9% vs. 28.8%, p = 0.535).
    UNASSIGNED: Pre-rehydration based on FTc can effectively reduce the occurrence of post-induction hypotension in patients undergoing gastrointestinal surgery who present with insufficient volume.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.chictr.org.cn/showprojEN.html?proj=201481.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    颈动脉校正流量时间(FTc)和潮气量挑战脉压变化(VtPPV)是评估机器人辅助手术中容量状态和液体反应性的有用临床参数,但其作为目标导向液体治疗(GDFT)靶点的有效性尚不清楚.我们调查了GDFT中作为靶标的FTc或VtPPV是否劣于PPV。这个单一中心,prospective,随机化,非劣效性研究纳入了133名接受机器人辅助腹腔镜妇科手术的女性,这些女性采用改良的头朝下截石位。患者平均分为三组,GDFT协议由FTc指导,VtPPV,或手术期间的PPV。主要结局是低血压的时间加权平均值的非劣效性,术中液体量,和尿量。次要结果是手术前后的视神经鞘直径(ONSD)以及术前和术后第1天的肌酐和血尿素氮。术中低血压指数无显著差异,输液和尿量,FTc和VtPPV组和PPV组之间的术后ONSD。术前FTc组和VtPPV组之间的血清肌酐和尿素氮水平没有差异,但在术后第一天,FTc组尿素氮水平高于PPV组(4.09±1.28vs.3.0±1.1mmol/L,1.08[0.59,1.58],p<0.0001),与术前值的差异小于PPV组(-2[-2.97,1.43]vs.-1.34[-1.9,-0.67],p=0.004)。在改良的头朝下取石术位置的机器人辅助腹腔镜手术中,FTc或VtPPV引导的协议不逊于GDFT中的PPV。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心(ChiCTR2200064419)。
    Carotid corrected flow time (FTc) and tidal volume challenge pulse pressure variation (VtPPV) are useful clinical parameters for assessing volume status and fluid responsiveness in robot-assisted surgery, but their usefulness as goal-directed fluid therapy (GDFT) targets is unclear. We investigated whether FTc or VtPPV as targets are inferior to PPV in GDFT. This single-center, prospective, randomized, non-inferiority study included 133 women undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecological surgery in the modified head-down lithotomy position. Patients were equally divided into three groups, and the GDFT protocol was guided by FTc, VtPPV, or PPV during surgery. Primary outcomes were non-inferiority of the time-weighted average of hypotension, intraoperative fluid volume, and urine output. Secondary outcomes were optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) pre- and post-operatively and creatinine and blood urea nitrogen preoperatively and on day 1 post-operatively. No significant differences were observed in intraoperative hypotension index, infusion and urine volumes, and ONSD post-operatively between the FTc and VtPPV groups and the PPV group. No differences in serum creatinine and urea nitrogen levels were identified between the FTc and VtPPV groups preoperatively, but on day 1 post-operatively, the urea nitrogen level in the FTc group was higher than that in the PPV group (4.09 ± 1.28 vs. 3.0 ± 1.1 mmol/L, 1.08 [0.59, 1.58], p < 0.0001), and the difference from the preoperative value was smaller than that in the PPV group (- 2 [- 2.97, 1.43] vs. - 1.34 [- 1.9, - 0.67], p = 0.004). FTc- or VtPPV-guided protocols are not inferior to that of PPV in GDFT during robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the modified head-down lithotomy position.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2200064419).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    我们旨在比较超声评估的颈动脉校正血流时间的能力以及潮气量挑战引起的动态预负荷指数的变化,以改良的头朝下截石位接受机器人辅助腹腔镜妇科手术的患者的液体反应性。这项前瞻性单中心研究包括接受机器人辅助腹腔镜手术的患者,这些患者采用改良的头下截石位。颈动脉多普勒参数和血流动力学数据,包括校正的流动时间,脉压变化,每搏输出量变化,和在潮气量为6mL/kg预测体重时以及将潮气量增加至8mL/kg预测体重后的每搏量指数(潮气量挑战),分别,被测量。流体反应性定义为体积膨胀后每搏输出量指数增加≥10%。在52名患者中,基于每搏输出量指数,26个被分类为流体响应者,26个被分类为非响应者。为预测潮气量挑战后对校正后的流量时间和脉压变化(ΔPPV6-8)的流体响应性而测得的接收器工作特征曲线下面积为0.82[95%置信区间(CI)0.71-0.94;P<0.0001]和0.85(95%CI0.74-0.96;P<0.0001),分别。潮气量为8mL/kg时的脉压变化值为0.79(95%CI0.67-0.91;P=0.0003)。校正后的流动时间和ΔPPV6-8的最佳截止值为357ms且>1%,分别。校正的流量时间和潮气量挑战后脉压变化的变化都可靠地预测了在改良的头朝下取石术位置接受机器人辅助腹腔镜妇科手术的患者的液体反应性。潮气量为8mL/kg时的脉压变化也可能是有用的预测因子。试验注册:中国临床试验注册中心(CHiCTR2200060573,首席研究员:刘洪亮,注册日期:2022年6月5日)。
    We aimed to compare the ability of carotid corrected flow time assessed by ultrasound and the changes in dynamic preload indices induced by tidal volume challenge predicting fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecological surgery in the modified head-down lithotomy position. This prospective single-center study included patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery in the modified head-down lithotomy position. Carotid Doppler parameters and hemodynamic data, including corrected flow time, pulse pressure variation, stroke volume variation, and stroke volume index at a tidal volume of 6 mL/kg predicted body weight and after increasing the tidal volume to 8 mL/kg predicted body weight (tidal volume challenge), respectively, were measured. Fluid responsiveness was defined as a stroke volume index ≥ 10% increase after volume expansion. Among the 52 patients included, 26 were classified as fluid responders and 26 as non-responders based on the stroke volume index. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve measured to predict the fluid responsiveness to corrected flow time and changes in pulse pressure variation (ΔPPV6-8) after tidal volume challenge were 0.82 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.71-0.94; P < 0.0001] and 0.85 (95% CI 0.74-0.96; P < 0.0001), respectively. The value for pulse pressure variation at a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg was 0.79 (95% CI 0.67-0.91; P = 0.0003). The optimal cut-off values for corrected flow time and ΔPPV6-8 were 357 ms and > 1%, respectively. Both the corrected flow time and Changes in pulse pressure variation after tidal volume challenge reliably predicted fluid responsiveness in patients undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic gynecological surgery in the modified head-down lithotomy position. And pulse pressure variation at a tidal volume of 8 mL/kg maybe also a useful predictor.Trial registration: Chinese Clinical Trial Register (CHiCTR2200060573, Principal investigator: Hongliang Liu, Date of registration: 05/06/2022).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    Recently published study of Ma et al. evaluates two relatively novel measures of fluid responsiveness, carotid blood flow and corrected carotid flow time (ccFT). Both measures have been recently quoted as possibly useful, technically simple, and noninvasive dynamic tools in predicting fluid responsiveness. Recently, more research interest has been focused on ccFT and, intrigued by the data presented in this study, we discuss here the impact of the data presented in the paper of Ma et al. to the significance of this metric as a potential tool in the assessment of fluid responsiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号