Objective.The possibility of interference by electromagnetic fields in the workplaces with cardiac implants is a concern for both individuals and employers. This article presents an analysis of the interference to which cardiac implants are subjected under high-intensity electric field at the power frequency.Approach.Evaluations of interference were conducted by studying the induced voltages at the device input in the real case study and the substitute study, and establishing an association between them with the equivalence factorF. A funnel-shaped phantom, designed forin vitrotesting and representing the electrical characteristics of the locations where cardiac implants are installed, was used in the substitute study. A measuring system was implemented to measure the induced voltage at the device input under high intensity electric fields.Main results.The induced voltages obtained in the experimental measurements align with the findings of the numerical study in the phantom. By applying the equivalence factors derived between the real case study and the substitute study (2.39 for unipolar sensing; 3.64 for bipolar sensing), the induced voltages on the cardiac implants can be determined for the real case using the substitute experimental set-up.Significance.The interference voltages on the cardiac implants under electric field exposures at low frequency were experimentally measured with detailed description. The findings provide evidence for an analysis method to systematically study the electromagnetic interference on the cardiac implants at low frequency.

BACKGROUND: The 2014 Heart Rhythm Society consensus statement defines histological (definite) and clinical (probable) diagnostic categories of cardiac sarcoidosis (CS), but few studies have compared their arrhythmic phenotypes and outcomes.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the electrophysiological/arrhythmic phenotype and outcomes of patients with definite and probable CS.
METHODS: We analyzed the arrhythmic/electrophysiological phenotype in a single-center North American cohort of 388 patients (median age 56 years; 39% female, n = 151) diagnosed with definite (n = 58) or probable (n = 330) CS (2000-2022). The primary composite outcome was survival to first ventricular tachycardia/fibrillation (VT/VF) event or sudden cardiac death. Key secondary outcomes were also assessed.
RESULTS: At index evaluation, in situ cardiac implantable electronic devices and antiarrhythmic drug use were more common in definite CS. At a median follow-up of 3.1 years, the primary outcome occurred in 22 patients with definite CS (38%) and 127 patients with probable CS (38%) (log-rank, P = .55). In multivariable analysis, only a higher ratio of the 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose maximum standardized uptake value of the myocardium to the maximum standardized uptake value of the blood pool (hazard ratio 1.09; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.15; P = .003, per 1 unit increase) was associated with the primary outcome. During follow-up, patients with definite CS had a higher burden of device-treated VT/VF events (mean 2.86 events per patient-year vs 1.56 events per patient-year) and a higher rate of progression to heart transplant/left ventricular assist device implantation but no difference in all-cause mortality compared with patients with probable CS.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with definite and probable CS had similarly high risks of first sustained VT/VF/sudden cardiac death and all-cause mortality, though patients with definite CS had a higher overall arrhythmia burden. Both CS diagnostic groups as defined by the 2014 Heart Rhythm Society criteria require an aggressive approach to prevent arrhythmic complications.

UNASSIGNED: Although atrial high-rate episode (AHRE) and atrial fibrillation (AF) cannot entirely be identical, recent studies suggest AHRE is linked to AF development and shares some characteristics with AF regarding thromboembolism. At present, there is still lack of predictive indicators for AHRE and diagnostic methods and clinical indicators for AHRE in patients without cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). The aim of this study was thus to explore the relationship between AHRE and left atrial (LA) strain parameters with the goal of identifying high-risk populations of AHRE by LA strain characteristics.
UNASSIGNED: From February 2022 to May 2023, a total of 105 CIED patients were enrolled and divided into two groups based on whether AHRE had occurred: AHRE (-) group (n=65) and AHRE (+) group (n=40). Real-time three-dimensional echocardiography (RT-3DE) technique was used to obtain the LA time-volume curve. The collected dynamic images were analyzed on the Echopac 204 workstation to obtain the parameters of LA. The four-dimensional automatic LA quantitative analysis (4D Auto LAQ) technology was used to analyze the LA strain parameters: LA reservoir longitudinal strain (LASr), LA conduit longitudinal strain (LAScd), LA contraction longitudinal strain (LASct), LA reservoir circumferential strain (LASr-c), LA conduit circumferential strain (LAScd-c), LA contraction circumferential strain (LASct-c). Correlation analysis was carried out using Binary logistic regression analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) was used to evaluate the diagnostic performance of LASct in AHRE.
UNASSIGNED: Body surface area (BSA) [odds ratio (OR) =8.34, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.32-72.30, P=0.037], LASct (OR =1.20, 95% CI: 1.05-1.39, P=0.013) and LA end-systolic volume (LAESV) (OR =1.02, 95% CI: 1.00-1.04, P=0.023) were the influencing factors of AHRE. Only LASct (OR =1.18, 95% CI: 1.01-1.38, P=0.041) was found to be an independent influencing factor of AHRE. This result remained significant after adjusting for age, sex, hypertension, diabetes, and stroke history. The ROC curve showed that the cut-off for predicting AHRE was LASct =-4.125% with sensitivity of 37.5% and specificity of 87.7%.
UNASSIGNED: This cross-sectional study found that decreased LASct (absolute value) is an independent risk factor for the AHRE and has diagnostic efficacy in certain degree for the occurrence of AHRE.

UNASSIGNED: Remote monitoring (RM) of patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) (pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators) has a Class 1, Level of Evidence A Heart Rhythm Society recommendation. Yet RM adherence varies widely across settings, and factors associated with variation are not understood.
UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to identify strategies for supporting RM across Veterans Health Administration (VHA) facilities.
UNASSIGNED: In a national evaluation, we surveyed and interviewed 27 nurses, medical instrument technicians, and advanced practice providers across 26 VHA facilities (following approximately 15,000 CIED patients). Participants were selected based on overall patient adherence by facility, which ranged from 46%-96%. Questions covered RM adherence strategies, manufacturer resources, organizational characteristics, and workflows for optimizing adherence.
UNASSIGNED: All clinicians reported that RM adherence was extremely important (53.8%), very important (34.6%), or important (11.5%) for improving patient outcomes. High performing facilities prioritized consistent patient education about RM and evaluated nonadherence using dashboards and manufacturer web sites. High performing facilities instituted clear standard operating procedures that defined staff responsibilities and facilitated efficient contact with nonadherent patients and then family members by phone and then mail. Clinicians based at high performing facilities spent twice as many hours per week (9.1) on average managing RM adherence compared to other facilities (4.5). Effective communication (internally and with non-VHA care partners) and use of CIED manufacturer resources were essential. Facilities that were not high performing rarely used these strategies.
UNASSIGNED: Clinicians can support high RM adherence by emphasizing patient education, regularly assessing and addressing nonadherence using staff protocols, and engaging CIED manufacturers.

暂无摘要。

An increasing number of patients undergoing elective or emergency surgery in the United States have a cardiovascular implantable electronic device. Practice advisories and consensus statements have been issued by the American Society of Anesthesiologists and the Heart Rhythm Society, advocating a multidisciplinary approach. Unfortunately, anesthesia providers often find themselves in a situation in which they are left to manage these devices independently. At the University of Washington Medical Center, an anesthesiology-based service to manage these devices has existed for more than a decade. Many problems with devices have been observed, including confusing rhythms, failure of magnets to provide the desired change in device function, and actual device malfunction. With these clinical case examples taken from the authors\' collective experience, this article provides an in-depth understanding of some key electrophysiology principles relevant to cardiovascular implantable electronic device function and appropriate perioperative management.

Infective endocarditis is a rare but devastating disease. Morbidity and mortality rates have failed to improve despite new technological advances. The disease has evolved over time with new significant populations at risk-most notably those with prosthetic valves or implantable cardiovascular devices. These devices pose new challenges for achieving a timely and accurate diagnosis of infection. While the modified Duke criteria is accepted as the gold standard for diagnosing native valve endocarditis, it has been shown to have significantly inferior sensitivity when it comes to identifying infections related to right-heart endocarditis, prosthetic valves, and indwelling cardiac devices. Additionally, prosthetic valves and cardiovascular implantable electronic devices can exhibit shadowing and artifact, rendering transthoracic echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography results inconclusive or even normal. Having a keen awareness of the varying clinical presentations, as well as emerging valvular imaging modalities such as F-fluorodeoxyglucose cardiac positron-emission tomography plus computed tomography, promises to improve the evaluation and diagnosis of infective endocarditis. However, indications for appropriate use of these studies and guidance on modern clinical management are still needed.

The authors evaluated the anesthetic approach for cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) placement and transvenous lead removal, hypothesizing that monitored anesthesia care is used more frequently than general anesthesia.
A retrospective study.
National Anesthesia Clinical Outcomes Registry data.
Adult patients who underwent CIED (permanent cardiac pacemaker or implantable cardioverter-defibrillator [ICD]) placement or transvenous lead removal between 2010 and 2021.
None.
Covariates were selected a priori within multivariate models to assess predictors of anesthetic type. A total of 87,530 patients underwent pacemaker placement, 76,140 had ICD placement, 2,568 had pacemaker transvenous lead removal, and 4,861 had ICD transvenous lead extraction; 51.2%, 45.64%, 16.82%, and 45.64% received monitored anesthesia care, respectively. A 2%, 1% (both p < 0.0001), and 2% (p = 0.0003) increase in monitored anesthesia care occurred for each 1-year increase in age for pacemaker placement, ICD placement, and pacemaker transvenous lead removal, respectively. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status ≤III for pacemaker placement, ASA ≥IV for ICD placement, and ASA ≤III for pacemaker transvenous lead removal were 7% (p = 0.0013), 5% (p = 0.0144), and 27% (p = 0.0247) more likely to receive monitored anesthesia care, respectively. Patients treated in the Northeast were more likely to receive monitored anesthesia care than in the West for all groups analyzed (p < 0.0024). Male patients were 24% less likely to receive monitored anesthesia care for pacemaker transvenous lead removal (p = 0.0378). For every additional 10 pacemaker or ICD lead removals performed in a year, a 2% decrease in monitored anesthesia care was evident (p = 0.0271, p < 0.0001, respectively).
General anesthesia still has a strong presence in the anesthetic management of both CIED placement and transvenous lead removal. Anesthetic choice, however, varies with patient demographics, hospital characteristics, and geographic region.

UNASSIGNED: The automobile passive keyless entry (PKE) system is a potential source of electromagnetic interference (EMI). We aim to determine the incidence and significance of EMI from automobile PKE system in cardiovascular implantable electronic device (CIED) patients.
UNASSIGNED: This was a single-center cross-sectional study conducted at Maharaj Nakorn Chiang Mai hospital, Thailand. Patients with CIED were instructed to lock and unlock two automobiles using the PKE system. Any EMI or arrhythmias were detected by CIED interrogation and single-lead electrocardiogram event recorder. We also used a spectrum analyzer to identify the automobiles working frequency bandwidth.
UNASSIGNED: There was a total of 102 CIED patients. Device types included 48.0% defibrillators, 37.3% permanent pacemakers, and 14.7% cardiac resynchronization therapy device. Both interrogated data from device and event monitor revealed no incidence of EMI during the PKE activation. We failed to identify the working frequency bandwidth of the two studied cars due to very low signal strength, thus blended in with the background noise.
UNASSIGNED: Automobile PKE systems transmitted very low power signals. Therefore, under normal circumstances, CIED patients can use automobile PKE system safely without any EMI regardless of key fob positions in relation to the CIED pulse generator.
UNASSIGNED: The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov), and the identification number is NCT03016390.

UNASSIGNED: In contrast to bloodstream infection due to a variety of bacteria in patients with cardiovascular implantable electronic devices (CIED), there are limited data regarding candidemia and risk of CIED infection.
UNASSIGNED: All patients with candidemia and a CIED at Mayo Clinic Rochester between 2012 and 2019 were reviewed. Cardiovascular implantable electronic device infection was defined by (1) clinical signs of pocket site infection or (2) echocardiographic evidence of lead vegetations.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 23 patients with candidemia had underlying CIED; 9 (39.1%) cases were community onset. None of the patients had pocket site infection. The duration between CIED placement and candidemia was prolonged (median 3.5 years; interquartile range, 2.0-6.5). Only 7 (30.4%) patients underwent transesophageal echocardiography and 2 of 7 (28.6%) had lead masses. Only the 2 patients with lead masses underwent CIED extraction, but device cultures were negative for Candida species. Two (33.3%) of 6 other patients who were managed as candidemia without device infection subsequently developed relapsing candidemia. Cardiovascular implantable electronic device removal was done in both patients and device cultures grew Candida species. Although 17.4% of patients were ultimately confirmed to have CIED infection, CIED infection status was undefined in 52.2%. Overall, 17 (73.9%) patients died within 90 days of diagnosis of candidemia.
UNASSIGNED: Although current international guidelines recommend CIED removal in patients with candidemia, the optimal management strategy remains undefined. This is problematic because candidemia alone is associated with increased morbidity and mortality as seen in this cohort. Moreover, inappropriate device removal or retention can both result in increased patient morbidity and mortality.