Cardiovascular disease risk

心血管疾病风险
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究探讨了氯氮平使用之间的复杂关系,心血管疾病(CVD)风险,精神分裂症(SCZ)患者的认知功能。
    方法:根据氯氮平的使用情况对包含765名患者的队列进行分层。人口统计数据,临床特征,收集糖脂代谢。使用性别特异性Cox回归计算器计算Framingham风险评分和血管年龄。使用可重复的神经心理学状态评估电池评估认知功能。
    结果:在患者中,34.6%是氯氮平使用者。氯氮平使用者显示收缩压较低,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇和总胆固醇(均ps<0.05)。此外,氯氮平使用者表现出更高的PANSS分数,RBANS评分较低(所有ps<0.05)。相关分析显示非氯氮平患者的CVD风险与阴性症状评分呈正相关(r=0.074,p=0.043),与阳性症状评分和RBANS评分呈负相关(r=-0.121,p=0.001;r=-0.091,p=0.028)。多变量逐步回归分析表明,注意力得分是氯氮平使用者CVD风险增加的预测因素(B=-0.08,95CI=-0.11至-0.03,p=0.003)。
    结论:使用氯氮平的SCZ患者表现出更严重的临床症状和认知障碍。注意是氯氮平使用者心血管疾病风险增加的预测因子。
    OBJECTIVE: This study explores the intricate relationship between clozapine use, cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk, and cognitive function in patients with schizophrenia (SCZ).
    METHODS: A cohort comprising 765 patients was stratified based on clozapine usage. Data on demographics, clinical characteristics, and glycolipid metabolism were collected. The Framingham Risk Score and vascular age were calculated using gender-specific Cox regression calculators. Cognitive function was assessed with the Repeatable Battery for Assessment of Neuropsychological Status.
    RESULTS: Among the patients, 34.6 % were clozapine users. Clozapine users exhibited lower systolic blood pressure, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol and total cholesterol (all ps < 0.05). Furthermore, clozapine users exhibited higher PANSS scores, along with lower scores in RBANS scores (all ps < 0.05). Correlation analysis revealed positive correlation between CVD risk in non-clozapine users and negative symptom scores (r = 0.074, p = 0.043), and negative correlation with positive symptom scores and RBANS scores (r = -0.121, p = 0.001; r = -0.091, p = 0.028). Multivariate stepwise regression analysis indicated that attention scores as predictive factors for increased CVD risk in clozapine users (B = -0.08, 95 %CI = -0.11 to -0.03, p = 0.003).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with SCZ using clozapine exhibit more severe clinical symptoms and cognitive impairments. Attention emerges as a predictor for increased CVD risk in clozapine users.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:典型的骨蛋白,如硬化素和骨膜素,与心血管疾病(CVD)有关。同时,已经开发了几种风险评分来预测普通人群中的CVD.因此,我们的目的是评估这些骨蛋白与CVD的相关性,主要血管风险量表:弗雷明汉风险评分(FRS),REGICOR和SCORE2-糖尿病,2型糖尿病患者。我们特别关注SCORE2-Diabetes算法,它预测了10年的CVD风险,并且特定于研究人群。
    方法:这是一项横断面研究,包括104名2型糖尿病患者(62±6年,60%男性)。临床数据,生化测量,并收集血清生物活性硬骨素和骨膜素水平,并计算了不同的风险量表。分析了生物活性硬化蛋白或骨膜蛋白与风险量表之间的关联。
    结果:生物活性硬化素(p<0.001)和骨膜素(p<0.001)的循环水平与SCORE2-Diabetes值呈正相关。然而,与FRS或REGICOR量表无相关性.高-非常高CVD风险(评分≥10%)患者的血清生物活性硬化蛋白和骨膜蛋白水平均显著高于低-中风险组(评分<10%)(两者均p<0.001)。此外,分析这些蛋白质,以确定2型糖尿病患者在高-非常高的血管风险使用ROC曲线,我们观察到生物活性硬化蛋白的AUC值(AUC=0.696;p=0.001),骨膜素(AUC=0.749;p<0.001),和结合两者的模型(AUC=0.795;p<0.001)。为了诊断高-非常高的血管风险,血清生物活性硬化素水平>131pmol/L显示51.6%的敏感性和78.6%的特异性。同样,血清骨膜素水平>1144pmol/L的敏感性为64.5%,特异性为76.2%。
    结论:在SCORE2-Diabetes算法中,硬化蛋白和骨膜蛋白与血管风险相关,为确定2型糖尿病人群中心血管风险的新型生物标志物开辟了一条新的研究路线.
    BACKGROUND: Typical bone proteins, such as sclerostin and periostin, have been associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD). Simultaneously, several risk scores have been developed to predict CVD in the general population. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the association of these bone proteins related to CVD, with the main vascular risk scales: Framingham Risk Score (FRS), REGICOR and SCORE2-Diabetes, in patients with type 2 diabetes. We focus in particular on the SCORE2-Diabetes algorithm, which predicts 10-year CVD risk and is specific to the study population.
    METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study including 104 patients with type 2 diabetes (62 ± 6 years, 60% males). Clinical data, biochemical measurements, and serum bioactive sclerostin and periostin levels were collected, and different risk scales were calculated. The association between bioactive sclerostin or periostin with the risk scales was analyzed.
    RESULTS: A positive correlation was observed between circulating levels of bioactive sclerostin (p < 0.001) and periostin (p < 0.001) with SCORE2-Diabetes values. However, no correlation was found with FRS or REGICOR scales. Both serum bioactive sclerostin and periostin levels were significantly elevated in patients at high-very high risk of CVD (score ≥ 10%) than in the low-moderate risk group (score < 10%) (p < 0.001 for both). Moreover, analyzing these proteins to identify patients with type 2 diabetes at high-very high vascular risk using ROC curves, we observed significant AUC values for bioactive sclerostin (AUC = 0.696; p = 0.001), periostin (AUC = 0.749; p < 0.001), and the model combining both (AUC = 0.795; p < 0.001). For diagnosing high-very high vascular risk, serum bioactive sclerostin levels > 131 pmol/L showed 51.6% sensitivity and 78.6% specificity. Similarly, serum periostin levels > 1144 pmol/L had 64.5% sensitivity and 76.2% specificity.
    CONCLUSIONS: Sclerostin and periostin are associated with vascular risk in the SCORE2-Diabetes algorithm, opening a new line of investigation to identify novel biomarkers of cardiovascular risk in the type 2 diabetes population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尽管各种随机对照试验(RCT)已经评估了雷洛昔芬对绝经后妇女载脂蛋白和脂蛋白(a)浓度的影响,结果不一致且尚无定论。因此,我们对RCT进行了这项荟萃分析,以研究雷洛昔芬给药对绝经后妇女载脂蛋白和脂蛋白(a)[Lp(a)]浓度的影响.
    方法:两名独立研究人员系统地搜索了科学文献(包括PubMed/Medline,Scopus,WebofScience,和EMBASE)用于截至2024年6月发表的英语随机对照试验(RCT)。我们纳入了RCT报告雷洛昔芬对载脂蛋白A-I(ApoA-I)的影响,载脂蛋白B(ApoB),绝经后妇女的Lp(a)水平。感兴趣的主要结果是Lp(a)的变化,次要结局是ApoA-I和ApoB的变化.
    结果:本荟萃分析纳入了12篇出版物和14个RCT组。从随机效应模型得出的综合结果显示ApoA-I的统计学显着增加(WMD:6.06mg/dL,95%CI:4.38,7.75,P<0.001)和ApoB浓度降低(WMD:-8.48mg/dL,95%CI:-10.60,-6.36,P<0.001)和Lp(a)(WMD:-3.02mg/dL,绝经后妇女服用雷洛昔芬后,95%CI:-4.83,-1.21,P<0.001)。在亚组分析中,在参与者平均年龄≥60岁,持续时间≤12周的RCT中,ApoA-I的升高以及ApoB和Lp(a)水平的降低更大.
    结论:当前对RCT的荟萃分析表明,雷洛昔芬治疗可降低绝经后妇女的ApoB和Lp(a)水平,同时增加ApoA-I水平。由于这些对脂质成分的影响与心血管疾病(CVD)的风险降低有关,雷洛昔芬可能是绝经后妇女的合适疗法,这些妇女患CVD的风险增加,并且有雷洛昔芬给药的其他医学指征。
    OBJECTIVE: Although various randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have evaluated the effect of raloxifene on apolipoproteins and lipoprotein(a) concentrations in postmenopausal women, the results have been inconsistent and inconclusive. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis of RCTs to investigate the effect of raloxifene administration on apolipoproteins and lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)] concentrations in postmenopausal women.
    METHODS: Two independent researchers systematically searched the scientific literature (including PubMed/Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and EMBASE) for English-language randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published up to June 2024. We included RCTs reporting the impact of raloxifene on apolipoprotein A-I (ApoA-I), apolipoprotein B (ApoB), and Lp(a) levels in postmenopausal women. The primary outcome of interest was change in Lp(a), and the secondary outcomes were changes in ApoA-I and ApoB.
    RESULTS: The present meta-analysis incorporated 12 publications with 14 RCT arms. The comprehensive outcomes derived from the random-effects model revealed a statistically significant increase in ApoA-I (WMD: 6.06 mg/dL, 95% CI: 4.38, 7.75, P < 0.001) and decrease in ApoB concentrations (WMD: -8.48 mg/dL, 95% CI: -10.60, -6.36, P < 0.001) and Lp(a) (WMD: -3.02 mg/dL, 95% CI: -4.83, -1.21, P < 0.001) following the administration of raloxifene in postmenopausal women. In the subgroup analyses, the increase in ApoA-I and the decrease in ApoB and Lp(a) levels were greater in RCTs with a mean participant age of ≥60 years and a duration of ≤12 weeks.
    CONCLUSIONS: The current meta-analysis of RCTs demonstrates that treatment with raloxifene reduces ApoB and Lp(a) levels while increasing ApoA-I levels in postmenopausal women. Since these effects on lipid components are associated with a reduced risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD), raloxifene could be a suitable therapy for postmenopausal women who are at an increased risk of CVD and have other medical indications for raloxifene administration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项横断面研究检查了宗教应对是否缓冲了种族歧视与几种可改变的心血管疾病(CVD)危险因素之间的关联-收缩压和舒张压(BP),糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c),体重指数(BMI),和胆固醇——在非洲裔美国女性和男性的样本中。
    方法:参与者数据来自跨生命周期多样性社区的健康老龄化研究(N=815;55.2%的女性;30-64岁)。种族歧视和宗教应对是自我报告的。对CVD危险因素进行临床评估。
    结果:在按年龄调整的性别分层分层回归分析中,社会经济地位,和药物使用,研究结果揭示了几个显著的互动关联和性别相反的影响。在经历过种族歧视的男性中,宗教应对与收缩压和HbA1c呈负相关。然而,在报告之前没有歧视的男性中,宗教应对与大多数危险因素呈正相关。在经历过种族歧视的妇女中,更大的宗教应对与更高的HbA1c和BMI相关.在很少使用宗教应对但遭受歧视的女性中,CVD风险最低。
    结论:宗教应对可能减轻种族歧视对非洲裔美国男性而非女性心血管疾病风险的影响。需要做更多的工作来了解加强这些应对策略是否只会使遭受歧视的人受益。宗教也可能无法缓冲与CVD风险升高相关的其他社会心理压力源的影响。
    OBJECTIVE: This cross-sectional study examined whether religious coping buffered the associations between racial discrimination and several modifiable cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk factors-systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), body mass index (BMI), and cholesterol-in a sample of African American women and men.
    METHODS: Participant data were taken from the Healthy Aging in Neighborhoods of Diversity Across the Life Span study (N = 815; 55.2% women; 30-64 years old). Racial discrimination and religious coping were self-reported. CVD risk factors were clinically assessed.
    RESULTS: In sex-stratified hierarchical regression analyses adjusted for age, socioeconomic status, and medication use, findings revealed several significant interactive associations and opposite effects by sex. Among men who experienced racial discrimination, religious coping was negatively related to systolic BP and HbA1c. However, in men reporting no prior discrimination, religious coping was positively related to most risk factors. Among women who had experienced racial discrimination, greater religious coping was associated with higher HbA1c and BMI. The lowest levels of CVD risk were observed among women who seldom used religious coping but experienced discrimination.
    CONCLUSIONS: Religious coping might mitigate the effects of racial discrimination on CVD risk for African American men but not women. Additional work is needed to understand whether reinforcing these coping strategies only benefits those who have experienced discrimination. It is also possible that religion may not buffer the effects of other psychosocial stressors linked with elevated CVD risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:中等至剧烈强度的体力活动(MVPA),心肺健康(CRF),冠状动脉钙化(CAC)与心血管疾病(CVD)风险相关。虽然已经报道了CRF或MVPA与CAC之间的U形关系,高适应个体中CAC的存在可能是良性的。我们检查了CRF或MVPA和CAC与结果的交互关联,并评估了CRF和MVPA与CAC发生率的关系。
    方法:纳入了2005-06年CAC评估的CARDIA参与者(n=3,141,平均年龄45岁)。通过自我报告和加速度计评估MVPA。CRF是通过最大等级运动测试来估计的。截至2019年获得裁定的CVD事件和死亡率数据。CAC在2010-11年度被重新评估。构建Cox模型来评估CVD的风险比(HRs),冠心病,和死亡率定义为CAC存在/不存在和低/高CRF或MVPA水平。构建Logistic模型以评估与CAC发病率的相关性。对社会人口统计学和CVD危险因素进行了调整。
    结果:相对于没有CAC和更高CRF的参与者,CAC和更高CRF的CVD调整后的HR为4.68,2.22对于无CAC和较低CRF,CAC和较低CRF为3.72。对于CHD,相应的HR分别为9.98、2.28和5.52。对于死亡率,HR分别为1.15、1.58和3.14。当MVPA,通过自我报告或加速度计测量,被替换为CRF。CRF和加速度计得出的MVPA与CAC发生率的稳健负相关部分是通过调整CVD风险因素来解释的。
    结论:在中年人中,CRF和MVPA与CAC发病率呈负相关,但并未减轻与CAC相关的心血管风险增加。表明CAC在CRF或MVPA水平较高的个体中不是良性的。
    这项研究探讨了身体素质之间的关系,身体活动,和冠状动脉钙化(CAC)预测心脏病风险。CAC是冠状动脉中钙沉积物的积聚,表明动脉粥样硬化的存在。该研究涉及大约3,000名平均年龄为45岁的成年人,通过自我报告和加速度计来测量身体活动,通过跑步机测试健身,和CAC在两个时间点,相隔五年。健康和活跃与开发新CAC的机会较低相关。同样,在13年的随访中,较高的体能和体力活动水平与较低的心脏病事件和死亡风险相关.相比之下,CAC的存在强烈预测了心脏病风险和死亡的升高。此外,有CAC消除了身体活动或健康的心脏健康益处。该研究得出的结论是,虽然身体健康和活跃是有益的,CAC仍然是心脏病的严重危险因素,即使是在健身和体力活动水平较高的个体中。在中年人中,有氧运动和身体活动与心脏病事件和死亡率的总体获益相关.尽管如此,患有CAC会显著增加心脏病事件的风险,即使是那些健康和活跃的人。
    OBJECTIVE: Moderate-to-vigorous-intensity physical activity (MVPA), cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF), and coronary artery calcification (CAC) are associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. While a U-shaped relationship between CRF or MVPA and CAC has been reported, the presence of CAC among highly fit individuals might be benign. We examined interactive associations of CRF or MVPA and CAC with outcomes and evaluated the relationship of CRF and MVPA to CAC incidence.
    METHODS: CARDIA participants with CAC assessed in 2005-06 were included (n=3,141, mean age 45). MVPA was assessed by self-report and accelerometer. CRF was estimated with a maximal graded exercise test. Adjudicated CVD events and mortality data were obtained through 2019. CAC was reassessed in 2010-11. Cox models were constructed to assess hazard ratios (HRs) for CVD, coronary heart disease (CHD), and mortality in groups defined by CAC presence/absence and lower/higher CRF or MVPA levels. Logistic models were constructed to assess associations with CAC incidence. Adjustment was made for sociodemographic and CVD risk factors.
    RESULTS: Relative to participants with no CAC and higher CRF, the adjusted HRs for CVD were 4.68 for CAC and higher CRF, 2.22 for no CAC and lower CRF, and 3.72 for CAC and lower CRF. For CHD, the respective HRs were 9.98, 2.28, and 5.52. For mortality, the HRs were 1.15, 1.58, and 3.14, respectively. Similar findings were observed when MVPA, measured either by self-report or accelerometer, was substituted for CRF. A robust inverse association of CRF and accelerometer-derived MVPA with CAC incidence was partly accounted for by adjusting for CVD risk factors.
    CONCLUSIONS: In middle-aged adults, CRF and MVPA demonstrated an inverse association with CAC incidence but did not mitigate the increased cardiovascular risk associated with CAC, indicating that CAC is not benign in individuals with higher CRF or MVPA levels.
    This study explored the relationship between physical fitness, physical activity, and coronary artery calcification (CAC) in predicting heart disease risk. CAC is the build-up of calcium deposits in the coronary arteries, indicating the presence of atherosclerosis. Involving approximately 3,000 adults with an average age of 45, the study measured physical activity through self-report and accelerometer, fitness via treadmill tests, and CAC at two time points, five years apart. Being fit and active was associated with a lower chance of developing new CAC. Similarly, higher fitness and physical activity levels were associated with a lower risk of experiencing heart disease events and death over 13 years of follow-up. In contrast, the presence of CAC strongly predicted elevated heart disease risk and death. Furthermore, having CAC eliminated the heart health benefits of being physically active or fit. The study concludes that while being fit and active is beneficial, CAC remains a serious risk factor for heart disease, even in individuals with higher fitness and physical activity levels. In middle-aged adults, being aerobically fit and physically active is associated with an overall benefit regarding heart disease events and mortality.Despite this, having CAC significantly increases the risk of heart disease events, even for those who are fit and active.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们应用了新的预测心血管疾病EVENT(PREVENT)风险方程来评估心血管-肾脏-代谢(CKM)健康和估计的CVD风险,包括心力衰竭(HF),减肥手术后。
    在1999-2022年期间在范德比尔特大学医学中心接受减肥手术的7804名患者(20-79岁)中,术前心血管疾病的危险因素,1年,从电子健康记录中提取手术后2年.总心血管疾病的10年和30年风险,动脉粥样硬化性CVD(ASCVD),冠心病,中风,在每个时间点对没有CVD或其亚型病史的患者进行评估,使用社会剥夺指数增强的预防方程。配对t检验或McNemar检验用于比较术前与术后CKM健康和CVD风险。两个样本t检验用于比较按年龄定义的患者亚组之间的CVD风险降低。性别,种族,操作类型,减肥,和糖尿病史,高血压,和血脂异常。
    CKM健康在手术后显著改善,收缩压降低,非高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(非HDL),和糖尿病患病率,但较高的HDL和估计的肾小球滤过率(eGFR)。10年总CVD风险从术前的6.51%降低到术后1年和2年的4.81%和5.08%(相对降低:25.9%和16.8%),分别。所有CVD亚型的风险均显著降低(即,ASCVD,CHD,中风,和HF),HF的减少最大(相对减少:手术后1年和2年的55.7%和44.8%,分别)。年龄更小,白人种族,>30%的重量损失,糖尿病史,无血脂异常史与HF风险降低相关.对于30年的风险估计也发现了类似的结果。
    减重手术显著改善CKM健康,降低估计的CVD风险,特别是HF,手术后1-2年内减少45-56%。HF风险降低可能因患者的人口统计学而异,减肥,和疾病史,这值得进一步研究。
    UNASSIGNED: We applied the novel Predicting Risk of Cardiovascular Disease EVENTs (PREVENT) equations to evaluate cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) health and estimated CVD risk, including heart failure (HF), after bariatric surgery.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 7804 patients (20-79 years) undergoing bariatric surgery at Vanderbilt University Medical Center during 1999-2022, CVD risk factors at pre-surgery, 1-year, and 2-year post-surgery were extracted from electronic health records. The 10- and 30-year risks of total CVD, atherosclerotic CVD (ASCVD), coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and HF were estimated for patients without a history of CVD or its subtypes at each time point, using the social deprivation index-enhanced PREVENT equations. Paired t-tests or McNemar tests were used to compare pre- with post-surgery CKM health and CVD risk. Two-sample t-tests were used to compare CVD risk reduction between patient subgroups defined by age, sex, race, operation type, weight loss, and history of diabetes, hypertension, and dyslipidemia.
    UNASSIGNED: CKM health was significantly improved after surgery with lower systolic blood pressure, non-high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol (non-HDL), and diabetes prevalence, but higher HDL and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). The 10-year total CVD risk decreased from 6.51% at pre-surgery to 4.81% and 5.08% at 1- and 2-year post-surgery (relative reduction: 25.9% and 16.8%), respectively. Significant risk reductions were seen for all CVD subtypes (i.e., ASCVD, CHD, stroke, and HF), with the largest reduction for HF (relative reduction: 55.7% and 44.8% at 1- and 2-year post-surgery, respectively). Younger age, White race, >30% weight loss, diabetes history, and no dyslipidemia history were associated with greater HF risk reductions. Similar results were found for the 30-year risk estimates.
    UNASSIGNED: Bariatric surgery significantly improves CKM health and reduces estimated CVD risk, particularly HF, by 45-56% within 1-2 years post-surgery. HF risk reduction may vary by patient\'s demographics, weight loss, and disease history, which warrants further research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用非传统的脂质参数来评估临床状况正在出现;然而,尚无研究确定这些参数的阈值,以识别心血管疾病(CVD)风险.本研究旨在建立非传统脂质参数的阈值,并测试其识别CVD危险因素的能力。
    一项针对女性的横断面研究(n=369,年龄:46±13岁,进行体重指数(BMI):26.31±2.54kg/m2)。收集血样并检测高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL-C),低密度脂蛋白胆固醇,总胆固醇(TC),和甘油三酯(TG)进行了估计。随后,计算了非传统的脂质参数,即非HDL-C,Castelli的风险指数II(CRI-II),CRI-I,脂蛋白联合指数(LCI),致动脉粥样硬化指数(AI),和血浆AI(AIP)。
    基于TC(≥200mg/dL),非HDL-C的导出阈值,CRI-II,CRI-I,LCI,AI,AIP为139毫克/分升,分别为2.29、3.689、58,066、2.687和0.487。同样,基于TG的阈值(≥150mg/dL),非HDL-C的导出阈值,CRI-II,CRI-I,LCI,AI,AIP为127mg/dL,分别为2.3、3.959、58、251、2.959和0.467。在考虑的五个风险因素中,非HDL-C,CRI-II,CRI-I,LCI和AI阈值能够识别四个风险因素(身体活动,血压,BMI,和年龄)和AIP最多能够与两个危险因素(血压和BMI)相关联。
    非传统脂质参数的衍生阈值能够区分CVD风险组和非风险组,提示可能使用这些阈值来研究CVD风险。
    UNASSIGNED: The use of nontraditional lipid parameters for assessing clinical conditions is emerging; however, no study has identified thresholds for those parameters for the identification of cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. The present study aimed to establish the thresholds of nontraditional lipid parameters and test its ability to identify CVD risk factors.
    UNASSIGNED: A cross-sectional study in women (n = 369, age: 46 ± 13 years, body mass index (BMI): 26.31 ± 2.54 kg/m2) was conducted. Blood samples were collected and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, total cholesterol (TC), and triglycerides (TGs) were estimated. Subsequently, nontraditional lipid parameters were calculated, namely non-HDL-C, Castelli\'s Risk Index II (CRI-II), CRI-I, lipoprotein combined index (LCI), atherogenic index (AI), and AI of plasma (AIP).
    UNASSIGNED: Based on TC (≥200 mg/dL), the derived thresholds for non-HDL-C, CRI-II, CRI-I, LCI, AI, and AIP were 139 mg/dL, 2.29, 3.689, 58,066, 2.687, and 0.487, respectively. Similarly, based on the threshold of TG (≥150 mg/dL), the derived thresholds for non-HDL-C, CRI-II, CRI-I, LCI, AI, and AIP were 127 mg/dL, 2.3, 3.959, 58,251, 2.959, and 0.467, respectively. Out of considered five risk factors, non-HDL-C, CRI-II, CRI-I, LCI, and AI thresholds were capable in identifying four risk factors (physical activity, blood pressure, BMI, and age) and AIP was able to associate with two risk factors at most (blood pressure and BMI).
    UNASSIGNED: The derived thresholds of nontraditional lipid parameters were capable of differentiating between CVD risk and nonrisk groups suggesting the possible use of these thresholds for studying CVD risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)的负担增加与全球超重和代谢综合征的发病率增加相似。由于代谢紊乱与脂肪肝的密切关系,一个新的术语,代谢相关脂肪性肝病(MAFLD),由一组专家提出,以更精确地描述由代谢紊乱引起的脂肪肝疾病。根据定义,MAFLD和NAFLD人群有相当大的差异,但重叠确实存在。这个新定义对临床实践有不可忽视的影响,包括诊断,干预措施,和合并症的风险。新出现的证据表明,MAFLD患者有更多的代谢合并症和全因死亡风险增加,尤其是心血管死亡率比NAFLD患者。在这次审查中,我们系统总结并比较了NAFLD或MAFLD患者心血管疾病(CVD)的风险和潜在机制.
    The increased burden of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) parallels the increased incidence of overweight and metabolic syndrome worldwide. Because of the close relationship between metabolic disorders and fatty liver disease, a new term, metabolic-related fatty liver disease (MAFLD), was proposed by a group of experts to more precisely describe fatty liver disease resulting from metabolic disorders. According to the definitions, MAFLD and NAFLD populations have considerable discrepancies, but overlap does exist. This new definition has a nonnegligible impact on clinical practices, including diagnoses, interventions, and the risk of comorbidities. Emerging evidence has suggested that patients with MAFLD have more metabolic comorbidities and an increased risk of all-cause mortality, particularly cardiovascular mortality than patients with NAFLD. In this review, we systemically summarized and compared the risk and underlying mechanisms of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with NAFLD or MAFLD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号