OBJECTIVE: Delineation variations and organ motion produce difficult-to-quantify uncertainties in planned radiation doses to targets and organs at risk. Similar to manual contouring, most automatic segmentation tools generate single delineations per structure; however, this does not indicate the range of clinically acceptable delineations. This study develops a method to generate a range of automatic cardiac structure segmentations, incorporating motion and delineation uncertainty, and evaluates the dosimetric impact in lung cancer.
METHODS: Eighteen cardiac structures were delineated using a locally developed auto-segmentation tool. It was applied to lung cancer planning CTs for 27 curative (planned dose ≥50 Gy) cases, and delineation variations were estimated by using ten mapping-atlases to provide separate substructure segmentations. Motion-related cardiac segmentation variations were estimated by auto-contouring structures on ten respiratory phases for 9/27 cases that had 4D-planning CTs. Dose volume histograms (DVHs) incorporating these variations were generated for comparison.
RESULTS: Variations in mean doses (Dmean), defined as the range in values across ten feasible auto-segmentations, were calculated for each cardiac substructure. Over the study cohort the median variations for delineation uncertainty and motion were 2.20-11.09 Gy and 0.72-4.06 Gy, respectively. As relative values, variations in Dmean were between 18.7%-65.3% and 7.8%-32.5% for delineation uncertainty and motion, respectively. Doses vary depending on the individual planned dose distribution, not simply on segmentation differences, with larger dose variations to cardiac structures lying within areas of steep dose gradient.
CONCLUSIONS: Radiotherapy dose uncertainties from delineation variations and respiratory-related heart motion were quantified using a cardiac substructure automatic segmentation tool. This predicts the \'dose range\' where doses to structures are most likely to fall, rather than single DVH curves. This enables consideration of these uncertainties in cardiotoxicity research and for future plan optimisation. The tool was designed for cardiac structures, but similar methods are potentially applicable to other OARs.

UNASSIGNED: Radiotherapy may cause grade ≥3 cardiac events, necessitating a better understanding of risk factors. The potential predictive role of imaging biomarkers with radiotherapy doses for cardiac event occurrence has not been studied.
UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to establish the associations between cardiac substructure dose and coronary artery calcium (CAC) scores and cardiac event occurrence.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective cohort analysis included patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with radiotherapy (2006-2018). Cardiac substructures, including the left anterior descending coronary artery, left main coronary artery, left circumflex coronary artery, right coronary artery, and TotalLeft (left anterior descending, left main, and left circumflex coronary arteries), were contoured. Doses were measured in 2-Gy equivalent units, and visual CAC scoring was compared with automated scoring. Grade ≥3 adverse cardiac events were recorded. Time-dependent receiver-operating characteristic modeling, the log-rank statistic, and competing-risk models were used to measure prediction performance, threshold modeling, and the cumulative incidence of cardiac events, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: Of the 233 eligible patients, 61.4% were men, with a median age of 68.1 years (range: 34.9-90.7 years). The median follow-up period was 73.7 months (range: 1.6-153.9 months). Following radiotherapy, 22.3% experienced cardiac events, within a median time of 21.5 months (range: 1.7-118.9 months). Visual CAC scoring showed significant correlation with automated scoring (r = 0.72; P < 0.001). In a competing-risk multivariable model, TotalLeft volume receiving 15 Gy (per 1 cc; HR: 1.38; 95% CI: 1.11-1.72; P = 0.004) and CAC score >5 (HR: 2.51; 95% CI: 1.08-5.86; P = 0.033) were independently associated with cardiac events. A model incorporating age, TotalLeft CAC (score >5), and volume receiving 15 Gy demonstrated a higher incidence of cardiac events for a high-risk group (28.9%) compared with a low-risk group (6.9%) (P < 0.001).
UNASSIGNED: Adverse cardiac events associated with radiation occur in more than 20% of patients undergoing thoracic radiotherapy within a median time of <2 years. The present findings provide further evidence to support significant associations between TotalLeft radiotherapy dose and cardiac events and define CAC as a predictive risk factor.

UNASSIGNED: There is no consensus on the best photon radiation technique for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study quantified the differences between commonly used treatment techniques in NSCLC to find the optimal technique.
UNASSIGNED: Treatment plans were retrospectively generated according to clinical guidelines for 26 stage III NSCLC patients using intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), hybrid, and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMATC, and VMATV5 optimized for lower lung and heart dose). Plans were evaluated for target coverage, organs at risk dose (including heart substructures) and normal tissue complication probabilities (NTCP).
UNASSIGNED: The comparison showed significant and largest median differences (>1 Gy or >5%) in favor of IMRT for the mediastinal envelope and heart (maximum dose), in favor of the hybrid technique for the lungs (V5Gy of the total lungs and V5Gy of the contralateral lung) and in favor of VMATC for the heart (Dmean), most of the substructures of the heart, and the spinal cord (maximum dose). The VMATV5 technique had significantly lower heart dose compared to the hybrid technique and significantly lower lung dose compared to the VMATC, combining both advantages in one technique. The mean ΔNTCP did not exceed the 2 percent point (pp) for grade 5 (mortality), and 10 pp for grade ≥2 toxicities (radiation pneumonitis and acute esophageal toxicity), but ΔNTCP was mostly in favor of VMATC/V5 for individual patients.
UNASSIGNED: This planning study showed that VMATV5 was preferred as it achieved low lung and heart doses, as well as low NTCPs, simultaneously.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate dosimetric differences in organs at risk (OARs) and cardiac substructures in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) between the adaptive radiotherapy (ART) and non-ART groups.
METHODS: Thirty patients were treated with definitive radiotherapy +/- chemotherapy. Cardiac substructures including the left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and large vessels, were contoured. Eight patients experienced tumor shrinkage and were replanned (ART). Cumulative plans after ART were compared to the original plans (not considering volume reduction) in terms of dosimetric parameters. The cumulative plans of the ART group (n=8) and non-ART group (n=22) were compared in terms of the same dosimetric parameters.
RESULTS: Within the ART group, the following parameters were found to be significantly improved after re-planning: mean lung dose (MLD) (13.79 Gy vs. 15.6 Gy), V20Gy both lungs (17.88% vs. 27.38%), ipsilateral MLD (20.87 Gy vs. 24.44 Gy), and esophagus mean dose (20.79 Gy vs. 24.2 Gy). No dosimetric differences were observed in heart substructures. Dosimetric parameters, particularly LAD, were significantly worse in the ART group than in the non-ART group. This is probably because this OAR was not considered in the plan optimization after re-planning, because it was not routinely contoured as an OAR.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis showed an improvement in dosimetric parameters in the lungs and esophagus in the ART group. This approach may lead to a possible reduction in toxicity. Contouring of cardiac substructures could lead to a plan optimization of their parameters and eventually reduce the risk of cardiac toxicities in these patients.

In patients with recurrent ventricular tachycardia (VT), STereotactic Arrhythmia Radioablation (STAR) shows promising results. The STOPSTORM.eu consortium was established to investigate and harmonise STAR treatment in Europe. The primary goals of this benchmark study were to standardise contouring of organs at risk (OAR) for STAR, including detailed substructures of the heart, and accredit each participating centre.
Centres within the STOPSTORM.eu consortium were asked to delineate 31 OAR in three STAR cases. Delineation was reviewed by the consortium expert panel and after a dedicated workshop feedback and accreditation was provided to all participants. Further quantitative analysis was performed by calculating DICE similarity coefficients (DSC), median distance to agreement (MDA), and 95th percentile distance to agreement (HD95).
Twenty centres participated in this study. Based on DSC, MDA and HD95, the delineations of well-known OAR in radiotherapy were similar, such as lungs (median DSC = 0.96, median MDA = 0.1 mm and median HD95 = 1.1 mm) and aorta (median DSC = 0.90, median MDA = 0.1 mm and median HD95 = 1.5 mm). Some centres did not include the gastro-oesophageal junction, leading to differences in stomach and oesophagus delineations. For cardiac substructures, such as chambers (median DSC = 0.83, median MDA = 0.2 mm and median HD95 = 0.5 mm), valves (median DSC = 0.16, median MDA = 4.6 mm and median HD95 = 16.0 mm), coronary arteries (median DSC = 0.4, median MDA = 0.7 mm and median HD95 = 8.3 mm) and the sinoatrial and atrioventricular nodes (median DSC = 0.29, median MDA = 4.4 mm and median HD95 = 11.4 mm), deviations between centres occurred more frequently. After the dedicated workshop all centres were accredited and contouring consensus guidelines for STAR were established.
This STOPSTORM multi-centre critical structure contouring benchmark study showed high agreement for standard radiotherapy OAR. However, for cardiac substructures larger disagreement in contouring occurred, which may have significant impact on STAR treatment planning and dosimetry evaluation. To standardize OAR contouring, consensus guidelines for critical structure contouring in STAR were established.

BACKGROUND: Dose to heart substructures is a better predictor for major adverse cardiac events (MACE) than mean heart dose (MHD). We propose an avoidance planning strategy for important cardiac substructures.
METHODS: Two plans, clinical and cardiac substructure-avoidance plan, were generated for twenty patients. Five dose-sensitive substructures, including left ventricle, pulmonary artery, left anterior descending branch, left circumflex branch and the coronary artery were chosen. The avoidance plan aims to meet the target criteria and organ-at-risk (OARs) constraints while minimizing the dose parameters of the above five substructures. The dosimetric assessments included the mean dose and the maximum dose of cardiac substructures and several volume parameters. In addition, we also evaluated the relative risk of coronary artery disease (CAD), chronic heart failure (CHF), and radiation pneumonia (RP).
RESULTS: Pearson correlation coefficient and R2 value of linear regression fitting demonstrated that MHD had poor prediction ability for the mean dose of the cardiac substructures. Compared to clinical plans, an avoidance plan is able to statistically significantly decrease the dose to key substructures. Meanwhile, the dose to OARs and the coverage of the target are comparable in the two plans. In addition, it can be observed that the avoidance plan statistically decreases the relative risks of CAD, CHF, and RP.
CONCLUSIONS: The substructure-avoidance planning strategy that incorporates the cardiac substructures into optimization process, can protect the important heart substructures, such as left ventricle, left anterior descending branch and pulmonary artery, achieving the substantive sparing of dose-sensitive cardiac structures, and have the potential to decrease the relative risks of CAD, CHF, and RP.

Left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy can lead to late cardiovascular complications, including ischemic events. To mitigate these risks, cardiac-sparing techniques such as deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) have been developed. However, recent studies have shown that mean heart dose is not a sufficient dosimetric parameter for assessing cardiac exposure. In this study, we aimed to compare the radiation exposure to cardiac substructures for ten patients who underwent hypofractionated radiotherapy using DIBH three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT), free-breathing (FB)-3DCRT, and FB helical tomotherapy (HT). Dosimetric parameters of cardiac substructures were analyzed, and the results were statistically compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test. This study found a significant reduction in the dose to the heart, left anterior descending coronary artery, and ventricles with DIBH-3DCRT and FB-HT compared to FB-3DCRT. While DIBH-3DCRT was very effective in sparing the heart, in some cases, it provided little or no cardiac sparing. FB-HT can be an interesting treatment modality to reduce the dose to major coronary vessels and ventricles and may be of interest for patients with cardiovascular risks who do not benefit from or cannot perform DIBH. These findings highlight the importance of cardiac-sparing techniques for precise delivery of radiation therapy.

Accurate and consistent delineation of cardiac substructures is challenging. The aim of this work was to validate a novel segmentation tool for automatic delineation of cardiac structures and subsequent dose evaluation, with potential application in clinical settings and large-scale radiation-related cardiotoxicity studies.
A recently developed hybrid method for automatic segmentation of 18 cardiac structures, combining deep learning, multi-atlas mapping and geometric segmentation of small challenging substructures, was independently validated on 30 lung cancer cases. These included anatomical and imaging variations, such as tumour abutting heart, lung collapse and metal artefacts. Automatic segmentations were compared with manual contours of the 18 structures using quantitative metrics, including Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean distance to agreement (MDA) and dose comparisons.
A comparison of manual and automatic contours across all cases showed a median DSC of 0.75-0.93 and a median MDA of 2.09-3.34 mm for whole heart and chambers. The median MDA for great vessels, coronary arteries, cardiac valves, sinoatrial and atrioventricular conduction nodes was 3.01-8.54 mm. For the 27 cases treated with curative intent (planned target volume dose ≥50 Gy), the median dose difference was -1.12 to 0.57 Gy (absolute difference of 1.13-3.25%) for the mean dose to heart and chambers; and -2.25 to 4.45 Gy (absolute difference of 0.94-6.79%) for the mean dose to substructures.
The novel hybrid automatic segmentation tool reported high accuracy and consistency over a validation set with challenging anatomical and imaging variations. This has promising applications in substructure dose calculations of large-scale datasets and for future studies on long-term cardiac toxicity.

BACKGROUND: Multi-modal learning is widely adopted to learn the latent complementary information between different modalities in multi-modal medical image segmentation tasks. Nevertheless, the traditional multi-modal learning methods require spatially well-aligned and paired multi-modal images for supervised training, which cannot leverage unpaired multi-modal images with spatial misalignment and modality discrepancy. For training accurate multi-modal segmentation networks using easily accessible and low-cost unpaired multi-modal images in clinical practice, unpaired multi-modal learning has received comprehensive attention recently.
OBJECTIVE: Existing unpaired multi-modal learning methods usually focus on the intensity distribution gap but ignore the scale variation problem between different modalities. Besides, within existing methods, shared convolutional kernels are frequently employed to capture common patterns in all modalities, but they are typically inefficient at learning global contextual information. On the other hand, existing methods highly rely on a large number of labeled unpaired multi-modal scans for training, which ignores the practical scenario when labeled data is limited. To solve the above problems, we propose a modality-collaborative convolution and transformer hybrid network (MCTHNet) using semi-supervised learning for unpaired multi-modal segmentation with limited annotations, which not only collaboratively learns modality-specific and modality-invariant representations, but also could automatically leverage extensive unlabeled scans for improving performance.
METHODS: We make three main contributions to the proposed method. First, to alleviate the intensity distribution gap and scale variation problems across modalities, we develop a modality-specific scale-aware convolution (MSSC) module that can adaptively adjust the receptive field sizes and feature normalization parameters according to the input. Secondly, we propose a modality-invariant vision transformer (MIViT) module as the shared bottleneck layer for all modalities, which implicitly incorporates convolution-like local operations with the global processing of transformers for learning generalizable modality-invariant representations. Third, we design a multi-modal cross pseudo supervision (MCPS) method for semi-supervised learning, which enforces the consistency between the pseudo segmentation maps generated by two perturbed networks to acquire abundant annotation information from unlabeled unpaired multi-modal scans.
RESULTS: Extensive experiments are performed on two unpaired CT and MR segmentation datasets, including a cardiac substructure dataset derived from the MMWHS-2017 dataset and an abdominal multi-organ dataset consisting of the BTCV and CHAOS datasets. Experiment results show that our proposed method significantly outperforms other existing state-of-the-art methods under various labeling ratios, and achieves a comparable segmentation performance close to single-modal methods with fully labeled data by only leveraging a small portion of labeled data. Specifically, when the labeling ratio is 25%, our proposed method achieves overall mean DSC values of 78.56% and 76.18% in cardiac and abdominal segmentation, respectively, which significantly improves the average DSC value of two tasks by 12.84% compared to single-modal U-Net models.
CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed method is beneficial for reducing the annotation burden of unpaired multi-modal medical images in clinical applications.

Radiotherapy for thoracic and breast tumours is associated with a range of cardiotoxicities. Emerging evidence suggests cardiac substructure doses may be more predictive of specific outcomes, however, quantitative data necessary to develop clinical planning constraints is lacking. Retrospective analysis of patient data is required, which relies on accurate segmentation of cardiac substructures. In this study, a novel model was designed to deliver reliable, accurate, and anatomically consistent segmentation of 18 cardiac substructures on computed tomography (CT) scans. Thirty manually contoured CT scans were included. The proposed multi-stage method leverages deep learning (DL), multi-atlas mapping, and geometric modelling to automatically segment the whole heart, cardiac chambers, great vessels, heart valves, coronary arteries, and conduction nodes. Segmentation performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean distance to agreement (MDA), Hausdorff distance (HD), and volume ratio. Performance was reliable, with no errors observed and acceptable variation in accuracy between cases, including in challenging cases with imaging artefacts and atypical patient anatomy. The median DSC range was 0.81-0.93 for whole heart and cardiac chambers, 0.43-0.76 for great vessels and conduction nodes, and 0.22-0.53 for heart valves. For all structures the median MDA was below 6 mm, median HD ranged 7.7-19.7 mm, and median volume ratio was close to one (0.95-1.49) for all structures except the left main coronary artery (2.07). The fully automatic algorithm takes between 9 and 23 min per case. The proposed fully-automatic method accurately delineates cardiac substructures on radiotherapy planning CT scans. Robust and anatomically consistent segmentations, particularly for smaller structures, represents a major advantage of the proposed segmentation approach. The open-source software will facilitate more precise evaluation of cardiac doses and risks from available clinical datasets.