BACKGROUND: Mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET) exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutation is a rare alteration in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), occurring in about 3%-4% of cases. Here we report disease and patient characteristics, and efficacy and tolerability of MET inhibitors among advanced METex14 NSCLC patients from the Italian real-world registry ATLAS.
METHODS: Clinical-pathological and molecular data, and treatment efficacy/tolerability outcomes were retrospectively collected from the ATLAS registry.
RESULTS: From July 2020 to July 2023 a total of 146 METex14 advanced NSCLC patients were included across 27 Italian centers. Median age was 74 years, and most patients were male (52%), with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status < 2 (72%) and adenocarcinoma subtype (83%). One hundred and twenty-five out of 146 (86%) patients received at least one line of systemic anticancer therapy. Fifty-six (38%) were treated with capmatinib and 34 (23%) with tepotinib. 29% and 52% of them received targeted treatment in the first and second line, respectively. In the cohort of patients treated with MET inhibitors, the response rate (RR) was 37% (33% in previously treated patients and 46% in treatment-naïve) with a disease control rate of 62%. With a median follow-up of 10.8 months, progression-free survival was 6.6 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.3-8.3 months] and overall survival was 10.7 months (95% CI 7.2-19.3 months). In patients with measurable brain metastases (17 cases), the intracranial RR was 41%. Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 12% of patients with grade 3 peripheral edema in 7% of cases. A fatal adverse reaction occurred in one patient due to pneumonitis. TRAEs-related dose reduction and discontinuation were reported in 6% and 8% of cases, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Capmatinib and tepotinib represent an effective treatment option in NSCLC patients with METex14. Real-world efficacy outcomes are worse than those reported in prospective clinical trials. Their activity is more pronounced in the treatment-naïve population, suggesting that this is the right setting in the management of patients with METex14.

UNASSIGNED: Capmatinib, a potent and selective MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), holds promise as a therapeutic agent due to its potentially elevated intracranial efficacy in metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring exon 14 skipping alterations in MET (MET Proto-Oncogene). This study aims to evaluate a targeted therapeutic approach to an MET exon 14 skipping (METex14) advanced NSCLC patient that progressed on Crizotinib and developed off target resistance alteration in PIK3CA.
UNASSIGNED: We present a case of advanced METex14 NSCLC patient wherein central nervous system (CNS) relapse occurred post complete surgical resection and remission of the lung tumor under first-line crizotinib treatment. Subsequent disease monitoring demonstrated a profound intracranial response to capmatinib in a crizotinib-resistant brain lesion. Molecular analysis unveiled the original METex14 D1028N driver mutation and a newly arisen PIK3CA bypass mutation, potentially contributing to off-target resistance.
UNASSIGNED: Before capmatinib was approved as a first line treatment option for metastatic NSCLC harboring somatic METex14 mutations, crizotinib conferred a potential option for targeted treatment. Switching to a selective MET-TKI like capmatinib with a better CNS penetration, it appears to be a promising approach for CNS metastasized NSCLC patients with METex14 mutations that failed on crizotinib. Further research is needed to more effectively understand and monitor resistance mechanisms using advanced diagnostic techniques such as DNA-based hybrid-capture (HC) next generation sequencing (NGS) to guide molecularly stratified therapy beyond the first line setting.

Various driver mutations and the corresponding molecular-targeted drugs have been detected and developed in non-small cell lung cancer. There were many cases in which surgical specimens had happened to find double primary cancers. However, to our knowledge, our case was the first report of synchronous double primary lung adenocarcinomas harboring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) L858R and mesenchymal-to-epithelial transition (MET) exon 14 skipping mutations. A 75-year-old Japanese woman with chronic heart and renal failures was referred to our department because of a growing nodule in the right upper lung field on chest X-ray films. Chest computed tomography (CT) detected a nodule in the right S1 and another nodule in the left S1+2. Bronchoscopic biopsy diagnosed the right S1 nodule as moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma. Oncomine Dx Target Test Multi-CDx system of the right S1 adenocarcinoma detected EGFR L858R mutation. The 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/CT showed abnormal uptakes both in the right S1 and the left S1+2 nodules, and in the bilateral inferior paratracheal lymph nodes. We made a diagnosis of c-stage IIIA (cT1bN2M0) of adenocarcinoma in the right S1 and suspected another primary lung cancer in the left S1+2. Considering her general conditions, comorbidities and wishes, we started osimertinib. The right S1 cancer achieved partial response (PR), while the left S1+2 nodule and lymph nodes enlarged. Aspiration cytology from the left supraclavicular lymph node showed adenocarcinoma. The FoundationOne® Liquid CDx tumor profiling test detected not only EGFR L858R, but also MET exon 14 skipping mutation. We made a diagnosis of another primary adenocarcinoma from the left S1+2 nodule (cT1bN3M0, c-stage IIIB) with MET mutation, and changed osimertinib to capmatinib. Although the left S1+2 cancer achieved and maintained PR by capmatinib, the right S1 cancer increased, and several new metastases appeared. The subsequent switch from capmatinib to osimertinib could not control cancers. In this case, we tried to switch monotherapies from osimertinib to capmatinib for double primary adenocarcinomas harboring different two driver mutations, according to each cancer progression. The temporal and spatial heterogeneity reinforces the need for primary tissue biopsy if dual primaries are suspected. Temporally distinct liquid biopsies, not standard at present, may be considered.

BACKGROUND: MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy is associated with improved outcomes in patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring a MET alteration, including MET exon 14 (METex14) skipping mutation, MET amplification, or MET fusion. However, primary or acquired resistance to TKI therapy ultimately develops. In preclinical models, hyperactivation of MAPK signaling was shown to promote resistance to MET TKI; resistance was overcome by co-treatment with a MET inhibitor and a MEK inhibitor. This phase I/Ib study offers a potential combination strategy simultaneously targeting MET (with capmatinib) and MEK signaling (with trametinib) to overcome resistance to MET inhibitor monotherapy in METex14 NSCLC.
METHODS: In the dose escalation phase, a minimum of 6 and maximum of 18 patients will be enrolled using a conventional 3+3 design with the primary endpoint of identifying a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of capmatinib in combination with trametinib. Once the RP2D is identified, patients will continue to enroll in a dose expansion phase to a total of 15 patients. The primary endpoint of the dose expansion phase is to further characterize the safety profile of the combination.
CONCLUSIONS: This phase I/Ib clinical trial will assess the safety and efficacy of combination capmatinib and trametinib in NSCLC patients whose tumors harbor METex14 skipping mutations, MET amplification, or MET fusion and had developed progressive disease on single agent MET inhibitor therapy.

Unfortunately, any targeted therapy is, always, started with low levels of the drug in the organism, selecting for drug resistance. One should propose that initial drug levels must be maximized, and durations may be minimized, ideally, as portions of preemptive combination of targeted drugs.

For the first time, we introduce a novel disposable and ultrasensitive sensing electrode made up of nanosized ceria uniformly loaded carbon nanofibers (CeNPs@CNF) sol-gel nanoceramic film (CF) wrapped on eco-friendly and inexpensive pencil graphite rods (PGRs) to explore their electro-catalytic detection of the anticancer drug capmatinib (CMB). The as-prepared CeNPs@CNF hybrid nanocomposite was described by XRD, SEM, TEM, HRTEM, and EDX analysis. The CV study clearly demonstrated that, the disposable CeNPs@CNF-CF/PGRE sensor exhibited excellent redox activities in the ideal probe [Fe(CN)6]3-/4-. Due to the outstanding electrochemical properties, larger electrochemically active surface area, and tremendous electro-catalytic activity of CeNPs@CNF, the reduction current of CMB on the CeNPs@CNF-CF/PGRE sensor is considerably higher than that of bare PGRE. The detection conditions, such as supporting electrolyte, pH of the buffer solution, amount of modifier, adsorption potential, and time, were studied and optimized. The sensing platform demonstrated high sensitivity (1.2 μA nM-1 cm-2), an ultralow detection limit (0.6 nM), and a wide linear range of 2.0 nM-400 nM of CMB compared to the bare PGRE. Additionally, the CeNPs@CNF-CF/PGRE sensor showed high selectivity, stability, and simple operation, which provided a promising alternative tool for fast detection of CMB in human body fluids with good recoveries.

OBJECTIVE: This phase 1b/2 trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of capmatinib plus nazartinib in patients with advanced EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS: In phase 1b, patients with progression on first-/second-generation EGFR-TKIs received escalating doses of capmatinib 200-400 mg bid plus nazartinib 50-150 mg qd. Once the MTD/RP2D was declared, phase 2 commenced with patient enrollment into groups according to mutation status and prior lines of treatment: group 1 (fasted; EGFR-TKI resistant; 1-3 prior lines; EGFRL858R/ex19del; any T790M/MET); group 2 (fasted; EGFR-TKI naïve; 0-2 prior lines; de novo T790M+; any MET); group 3 (fasted; treatment-naïve; EGFRL858R/ex19del; T790M-; any MET); group 4 (with food; 0-2 prior lines; EGFRL858R/ex19del; any T790M/MET). Primary endpoints in phase 2 were investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1 (groups 1-3), safety, and tolerability of the combination with food (group 4). Efficacy was assessed by T790M and MET status for a subgroup of patients.
RESULTS: The RP2D was capmatinib 400 mg bid plus nazartinib 100 mg qd. In phase 2 (n = 144), the ORR was 28.8 %, 33.3 %, 61.7 %, and 42.9 % in groups 1 (n = 52), 2 (n = 3), 3 (n = 47), and 4 (n = 42), respectively. In group 1 +phase 1b RP2D, the ORR was 45.8 %, 26.2 %, 37.9 %, and 32.4 % in MET+ (n = 24), MET- (n = 42), T790M+ (n = 29), and T790M- (n = 34) patients. Most common any-grade treatment-related adverse events (≥25 %; n = 144) were peripheral edema (54.9 %), nausea (41.7 %), diarrhea (34.0 %), and maculopapular rash (25.0 %).
CONCLUSIONS: Capmatinib plus nazartinib showed antitumor activity in patients with EGFR-TKI-resistant, EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The overall safety profile was acceptable.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02335944.

Dysregulation of mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) gene due to amplification, mutation, and fusion has been reported in various types of human cancers. Recently, the efficacy of small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) targeting MET has been demonstrated in a wide range of MET-dysregulated tumors. The majority of biliary tract cancers including intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (iCCA) are diagnosed at an advanced stage, and the utility of conventional chemotherapy is limited. Here, we present a case of metastatic iCCA harboring TFG-MET gene fusion, which demonstrated a remarkable response to treatment with capmatinib, a selective MET inhibitor. The patient was a 46-year-old man diagnosed with iCCA with hepatic, intraabdominal lymph nodes, and peritoneal metastases. Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) revealed TFG-MET gene fusion in his tumor. After becoming refractory to standard chemotherapy, he received capmatinib, which resulted in a marked shrinkage of the liver masses and lymph node metastases, as well as a drastic decrease in serum CA19-9 level. Our case reinforces the importance of CGP in exploring targeted therapy and supports the potential role of capmatinib in the treatment of tumors harboring MET fusions.

We report the case of an 87-year-old female patient who was diagnosed with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer harboring MET exon 14 skipping mutation (MET ex14) and PD-L1 expression of 60%. A first-line treatment with atezolizumab was started with primary resistance. Then, a second-line treatment with capmatinib, a selective type Ib MET tyrosine kinase inhibitor, was started, achieving a partial response. The patient is still alive and on treatment with capmatinib 300 mg twice daily after 20 months, with a good tolerability and no evidence of disease progression.In summary, our patient experienced a long-lasting response (>18 months) with capmatinib as second-line treatment. Further analyses evaluating the efficacy and tolerability of MET tyrosine kinase inhibitors are warranted, especially in the elderly, a non-small-cell lung cancer population whose tumors could more frequently harbor MET ex14 mutation.
[Box: see text].

BACKGROUND: This study provides comparative evidence of the selective MET inhibitor capmatinib versus standard of care (SOC) in first-line (1 L) and second-line (2 L) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with METex14 mutations in German routine care.
METHODS: SOC data were collected from German routine care via retrospective chart review. Analyses were conducted as naive and propensity score adjusted (PSA) comparisons to capmatinib-treated patients within the GEOMETRY mono-1 trial. Effectiveness endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), time to CNS progression (CNSprog), and exploratory safety endpoints.
RESULTS: The SOC arm included 119 patients in 1 L and 46 in 2 L versus 60 patients in 1 L and 81 in 2 L treated with capmatinib, with balanced baseline characteristics after PSA. In 1 L, the naive comparison showed a significant benefit of capmatinib versus SOC for OS (median: 25.49 vs 14.59 months; HR 0.58; 95 % CI 0.39-0.87; P = 0.011), PFS (median: 12.45 vs 5.03 months; HR: 0.44; 95 % CI: 0.31-0.63; P < 0.001), and ORR (event rate: 68.3 vs 26.9 %; RR 2.54; 95 % CI 1.80-3.58; P < 0.001). In 2 L, OS, PFS, and ORR showed positive trends favoring capmatinib over SOC. Capmatinib treatment in the 1 L and 2 L led to significant benefit in CNSprog. PSA analyses showed consistent results to naive analysis. Exploratory safety endpoints indicated a manageable safety profile for capmatinib.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates the important role of capmatinib in providing robust clinically meaningful benefit to patients with NSCLC harboring METex14 mutations and its significant role in preventing the development of brain metastases.