Cancer survival

癌症生存率
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)分期手册定期更新。本研究旨在研究描绘特定阶段生存曲线的分期表现,并根据台湾的第7和第8AJCC版本评估病例的重新分类。数据来自台湾癌症登记处2017年(第7版)和2018年(第8版)诊断病例,每个人都有2年的随访期。使用接受者工作特征曲线下面积和洛伦兹曲线导出的基尼指数评估性能,以及用于评估患者预后的2年生存率。第8版显示了四种特定癌症类型的优越分期。口咽癌在不同阶段表现出更多的2年生存率,肝癌的生存率随着阶段的进展而明显下降。第8版还改善了非小细胞肺癌的预后分期,并将第7版的第4期前列腺癌患者中的26.4%重新分类为第3或4A期。显示2年生存率超过90%。我们的研究强调了第8版对特定阶段的生存区分和病例重新分类的精细能力,以增强台湾某些癌症的预后。我们建议在采用新版本或版本时进行全面评估。
    The American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual is periodically updated. This study aims to examine the staging performances in delineating stage-specific survival curves and to evaluate the reclassification of cases based on the 7th and 8th AJCC editions in Taiwan. Data were sourced from the Taiwan Cancer Registry for cases diagnosed in 2017 (7th edition) and 2018 (8th edition), each with a 2-year follow-up period. Performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the Lorenz curve-derived Gini index, along with 2-year survival rates for evaluating patient prognoses. The 8th edition showed superior staging in four specific cancer types. Oropharyngeal cancer exhibited more variable 2-year survival rates across stages, and liver cancer showed a clearer decline in survival rates with advancing stages. The 8th edition also improved prognostic staging for non-small cell lung cancer and reclassified 26.4% of stage 4 prostate cancer patients under the 7th edition into stages 3 or 4A, showing 2-year survival rates above 90%. Our study highlights the 8th edition\'s refined capacity for stage-specific survival distinctions and reclassification of cases to enhance prognostication in certain cancers within Taiwan. We recommend a comprehensive evaluation when adopting a new edition or version.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:癌症患者的总体生存率一直在提高。然而,在不同的社会经济地位中,生存率的提高并不一致。因此,我们调查了癌症患者5年生存率(5YSR)的收入差异和时间趋势.
    方法:这项研究使用了2002年至2018年的国家癌症队列,该队列是通过连接韩国中央癌症登记处和国家健康保险服务(NHIS)索赔数据库来计算大韩民国的癌症生存率。生存数据从2002年开始,分析基于精算方法。我们比较了2002-2006年最早可用的5年生存率和2014-2018年最新可用的5年生存率,观察到2021年12月31日。根据保险费,收入水平分为六类:医疗援助受益人和五种NHIS亚型。不平等的斜率指数(SII)和不平等的相对指数被用来衡量5YSR的绝对和相对差异,分别。
    结果:所有癌症在2002-2006年和2014-2018年期间的5YSR改善。在研究期间,观察到肺的5年生存率(5YSR)显着改善,肝脏,还有胃癌.肺生存率的SII(17.5,95%置信区间(CI)7.0-28.1),肝脏(15.1,95%CI10.9-19.2),胃(13.9,95%CI3.2-24.7),结直肠(11.4,95%CI0.9-22.0),前列腺癌(10.7,95%CI2.5-18.8)明显升高,这意味着随着收入水平的提高,存活率更高。肺的SII,肝脏,胃癌增加了,而甲状腺,乳房,子宫颈,前列腺,结直肠癌在研究期间有所下降。
    结论:尽管从2002年到2018年,在癌症类型和收入水平中观察到5YSR的显着改善,但这种增加并没有在收入水平中均匀分布。我们的研究揭示了癌症患者生存的持续收入差距,特别是肺癌和肝癌。
    BACKGROUND: The overall survival rates among cancer patients have been improving. However, the increase in survival is not uniform across socioeconomic status. Thus, we investigated income disparities in the 5-year survival rate (5YSR) in cancer patients and the temporal trends.
    METHODS: This study used a national cancer cohort from 2002 to 2018 that was established by linking the Korea Central Cancer Registry and the National Health Insurance Service (NHIS) claim database to calculate the cancer survival rate by income level in the Republic of Korea. Survival data were available from 2002 onward, and the analysis was based on the actuarial method. We compared the survival of the earliest available 5-year period of 2002-2006 and the latest available 5-year period of 2014-2018, observing until 31 December 2021. Income level was classified into six categories: Medical Aid beneficiaries and five NHIS subtypes according to insurance premium. The slope index of inequality (SII) and relative index of inequality were used to measure absolute and relative differences in 5YSR by income, respectively.
    RESULTS: The 5YSR between the 2002-2006 and 2014-2018 periods for all cancers improved. A significant improvement in 5-year survival rates (5YSR) over the study period was observed in lung, liver, and stomach cancer. The SII of survival rates for lung (17.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 7.0-28.1), liver (15.1, 95% CI 10.9-19.2), stomach (13.9, 95% CI 3.2-24.7), colorectal (11.4, 95% CI 0.9-22.0), and prostate (10.7, 95% CI 2.5-18.8) cancer was significantly higher, implying higher survival rates as income levels increased. The SII for lung, liver, and stomach cancer increased, while that of thyroid, breast, cervical, prostate, and colorectal cancer decreased over the study period.
    CONCLUSIONS: Although substantial improvement in the 5YSR was observed across cancer types and income levels from 2002 to 2018, this increase was not uniformly distributed across income levels. Our study revealed persistent income disparities in the survival of cancer patients, particularly for lung and liver cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这篇综述探讨了饮食因素与乳腺癌预后之间的多方面关系。关注不饱和脂肪,地中海饮食(MD),和其他营养成分。乳腺癌仍然是一个重要的全球健康问题,饮食等生活方式因素在预防和管理中起着关键作用。审查遵循了2020年系统审查和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目。2019年至2024年间发布的英文文章是可以接受的。我们使用了相关的搜索词,如“不饱和脂肪”,“地中海饮食”,“乳腺癌”,和“营养”在PubMed中执行搜索,PubMedCentral(PMC),EBSCOhost,和灰色文献,如谷歌学者。筛选后,选择了479篇原始论文中的11篇,并将其包含在最终审查中。其中包括横断面分析和系统回顾,队列研究,叙事回顾,系统回顾和荟萃分析,病例对照研究,随机对照试验(RCT),和横断面研究。主要研究结果表明,坚持MD与改善乳腺癌女性的生活质量和降低死亡率相关。特别是在老年群体中。饮食强调富含抗氧化剂的食物,抗炎化合物,和健康的脂肪有助于这些观察到的好处。特定的不饱和脂肪,特别是omega-3多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFA),如二十二碳六烯酸(DHA)和二十碳五烯酸(EPA),通过调节癌细胞行为和增强治疗反应来证明抗癌特性。与MD相关的生物标志物,如β-胡萝卜素和番茄红素,作为饮食依从性和潜在风险降低的指标。此外,在橄榄油中发现的成分,包括多酚和单不饱和脂肪酸,通过发挥抗氧化和抗增殖作用,在预防乳腺癌方面表现出有希望的效果。其他饮食因素如钙,豆类,水果,蔬菜也在降低乳腺癌风险和提高生存率方面发挥作用。这篇综述强调了饮食干预在优化乳腺癌患者预后中的重要性,并强调了进一步研究以阐明潜在机制和完善饮食建议的必要性。
    This review explores the multifaceted relationship between dietary factors and breast cancer outcomes, focusing on unsaturated fats, the Mediterranean diet (MD), and other nutritional components. Breast cancer remains a significant global health concern, with lifestyle factors like diet playing a pivotal role in prevention and management. The review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. Articles written in English and released between 2019 and 2024 were acceptable. We used pertinent search terms such as \"unsaturated fats\", \"Mediterranean diet\", \"breast cancer\", and \"nutrition\" to perform searches in PubMed, PubMed Central (PMC), EBSCOhost, and grey literature such as Google Scholar. After screening, 11 of the 479 original papers were chosen and included in the final review. These include cross-sectional analysis and systematic review, cohort study, narrative review, systematic review and meta-analysis, case-control study, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and cross-sectional study. Key findings suggest that adherence to the MD correlates with improved quality of life measures and reduced mortality rates among women with breast cancer, particularly in older age groups. The diet\'s emphasis on antioxidant-rich foods, anti-inflammatory compounds, and healthy fats contributes to these observed benefits. Specific unsaturated fats, notably omega-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFAs) like docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) and eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA), demonstrate anti-cancer properties by modulating cancer cell behavior and enhancing treatment responses. Biomarkers associated with the MD, such as β-carotene and lycopene, serve as indicators of dietary compliance and potential risk reduction. Furthermore, components found in olive oil, including polyphenols and monounsaturated fatty acids, exhibit promising effects in preventing breast cancer by exerting antioxidant and anti-proliferative actions. Other dietary factors like calcium, legumes, fruits, and vegetables also play a role in reducing breast cancer risk and improving survival rates. This review underscores the importance of dietary interventions in optimizing outcomes for breast cancer patients and highlights the need for further research to elucidate underlying mechanisms and refine dietary recommendations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:已观察到患者主观整体评估(PG-SGA)标准在癌症幸存者中的预后效果,但需要在临床实践中进行验证。这项研究旨在评估PG-SGA评分的基线和纵向变化对现实世界中中国癌症患者全因死亡率的预后影响。
    方法:研究对象来自中国西部某具有代表性的三级医院。Kaplan-Meier曲线和Cox回归分析用于评估基线和PG-SGA评分的动态变化对癌症患者全因死亡率的预后影响。使用接收器工作特征曲线和一致性指数来评估PG-SGA标准的预测准确性。
    结果:本研究共纳入1415例癌症患者,平均年龄46岁。Cox回归分析显示,基线营养不良状态与癌症患者的生存率显著相关(PG-SGA4-8:风险比[HR]=1.46,95%置信区间[CI]:1.09-1.96,P=0.012;PG-SGA≥9:HR=1.78,95%CI:1.34-2.37,P<0.001)。观察到PG-SGA评分纵向增加(>2分)的癌症患者具有较高的死亡风险(HR=1.69,95%CI:1.04-2.74,P=0.033)。与PG-SGA评分的纵向变化相比,基线营养不良状态在识别风险亚组方面显示出更高的预测能力(一致性指数:0.646vs.0.586).敏感性分析支持主要发现。
    结论:本研究强调了基线和PG-SGA评分动态变化对癌症患者的预后价值,这可以帮助改善他们的结果。
    OBJECTIVE: The prognostic effects of the Patient-Generated Subjective Global Assessment (PG-SGA) criteria in cancer survivors have been observed but require validation in clinical practice. This study was designed to evaluate the prognostic effects of baseline and longitudinal changes in PG-SGA scores on all-cause mortality among Chinese cancer patients in a real-world setting.
    METHODS: Study patients were selected from one representative tertiary hospital in West China. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses were used to estimate the prognostic effect of baseline and dynamic changes in PG-SGA scores on the all-cause mortality of cancer patients. Receiver operating characteristic curves and a concordance index were used to evaluate the predictive accuracy of PG-SGA criteria.
    RESULTS: A total of 1415 cancer patients were included in this study, with a mean age of 46 years old. Cox regression analysis showed that baseline malnourished status was significantly associated with the survival of cancer patients (PG-SGA 4-8: hazard ratio [HR] = 1.46, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.09-1.96, P = 0.012; PG-SGA ≥9: HR = 1.78, 95% CI: 1.34-2.37, P < 0.001). Cancer patients with longitudinal increased PG-SGA scores (>2 points) were observed to have high risks for mortality (HR = 1.69, 95% CI: 1.04-2.74, P = 0.033). Compared with longitudinal changes in PG-SGA scores, baseline malnourished status showed higher predictive power in identifying the risk subgroup (concordance index: 0.646 vs. 0.586). Sensitivity analyses supported the main findings.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the prognostic value of baseline and dynamic changes in PG-SGA scores for cancer patients, which can help improve their outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:这项研究旨在检查癌症发病率的差异,诊断阶段,奥斯陆教育水平不同的地区的生存率,挪威。
    方法:使用挪威癌症登记处2013-2021年的汇总数据来描述奥斯陆15个行政区的癌症发病率和生存率的分布,随后根据人口的教育水平分为三个地区。计算结肠癌的年龄标准化发病率和五年相对生存率,直肠,肺,黑色素瘤,乳房,和前列腺癌。诊断时的阶段被归类为局部的,区域,遥远,除了乳腺癌,所有癌症类型都未知,这被归类为I-IV阶段和未知。
    结果:中、高学历地区的乳腺癌发病率较高,黑色素瘤,前列腺癌,而低教育地区的肺癌发病率较高。在所有研究的癌症类型中,低教育地区在遥远阶段被诊断出的比例高于其他组。除了乳腺癌.中、高学历地区的总体五年相对生存率较高。
    结论:发病率,诊断阶段,和生存不同的教育区域。这种变化表明了医疗保健服务的差距,护理质量,和健康行为。解决这些差距有助于改善整体健康结果,促进健康公平。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine disparities in cancer incidence, stage at diagnosis, and survival rates across districts with differences in education levels in Oslo, Norway.
    METHODS: Aggregated data from the Cancer Registry of Norway in the period 2013-2021 were used to describe the distribution of cancer incidence and survival across Oslo\'s 15 administrative districts, subsequently grouped into three areas based on the population\'s level of education. Age-standardised incidence rates and five-year relative survival were calculated for colon, rectal, lung, melanoma, breast, and prostate cancer. The stage at the time of diagnosis was categorised as localised, regional, distant, and unknown for all cancer types except breast cancer, which was categorised into stage I-IV and unknown.
    RESULTS: Mid- and high-education areas had higher incidences of breast, melanoma, and prostate cancer, while the low-education area had higher incidence rates for lung cancer. The low-education area had a higher proportion diagnosed at a distant stage than the other groups for all cancer types studied, except breast cancer. The mid- and high-education areas had higher five-year relative survival rates overall.
    CONCLUSIONS: Incidence, stage at diagnosis, and survival varied between education areas. The variation indicates disparities in healthcare access, quality of care, and health behaviours. Addressing these disparities can help improve overall health outcomes and promote health equity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Published Erratum
    [这更正了文章DOI:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1310823。].
    [This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1310823.].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先前的研究报道了血小板计数(PLT)与癌症生存率之间的不一致关联。然而,是否存在线性因果效应值得深入研究。我们使用UKBiobank和双样本孟德尔随机化(MR)分析进行了一项队列研究。在癌症诊断之前测量PLT水平。我们采用总生存期(OS)作为主要结果。Cox模型用于评估PLT在多个滞后时间对癌症诊断的生存结果的影响。我们采用34种遗传变异作为MR分析的PLT代理。对线性和非线性效应进行建模。还研究了带有仪器变体的基因表达的预后影响。共纳入65471例癌症患者。我们发现PLT升高(每100×109/L)和OS较差(HR:1.07;95%CI:1.04-1.10;p<.001)之间存在显著关联。对于几种癌症类型观察到类似的显著关联。我们进一步观察到PLT和癌症生存率之间的U型关系(p<.001)。我们的MR分析发现,没有证据支持PLT与总体癌症生存率之间的因果关系(HR:1.000;95%CI:0.998-1.001;p=.678),尽管非线性MR分析揭示了在较低PLT范围内潜在更大的有害影响。11个PLT相关基因的表达与癌症生存相关。早期检测到逐渐升高的PLT表明可能的隐匿性癌症发展和较差的后续生存结果。观察到的关联可能是非线性的。然而,PLT不太可能成为有希望的治疗靶标。
    背景是什么?先前的研究报道了血小板计数(PLT)与癌症生存率之间的不一致关联。然而,目前还不清楚是否存在线性因果效应,因为大多数研究在癌症诊断时测量PLT,这可能会受到癌症本身的影响。本研究旨在使用大型前瞻性队列和遗传分析来调查诊断前PLT与癌症生存结果之间的关联和潜在因果关系。观察性队列研究发现,诊断前血小板升高与总体和癌症特异性生存率下降之间存在显着关联。我们还确定了PLT与癌症生存率之间的U形关系,这表明高PLT和低PLT都可能是有害的。孟德尔随机化分析不支持PLT对癌症总生存率的因果效应。尽管它暗示了在较低的PLT范围内潜在的非线性效应。该研究还确定了几个基因(TPM4,PDIA5,PSMD13,TMCC2,ZFPM2,BAZ2A,CDKN2A,GP1BA,TAOK1,CABLES1和THPO)与与癌症生存率相关的PLT相关。有什么影响?研究结果表明,早期发现PLT升高可能表明隐匿性癌症发展和随后的生存结果较差。然而,PLT不太可能成为改善癌症生存率的有希望的治疗靶点。因为观察到的关联可能受到混杂因素的影响。该研究强调需要进一步研究PLT与癌症预后之间的复杂关系。以及其他血小板相关性状作为潜在药物靶点的探索。
    Previous studies have reported inconsistent associations between platelet count (PLT) and cancer survival. However, whether there is linear causal effect merits in-depth investigations. We conducted a cohort study using the UK Biobank and a two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analysis. PLT levels were measured prior to cancer diagnosis. We adopted overall survival (OS) as the primary outcome. Cox models were utilized to estimate the effects of PLTs on survival outcomes at multiple lag times for cancer diagnosis. We employed 34 genetic variants as PLT proxies for MR analysis. Linear and non-linear effects were modeled. Prognostic effects of gene expression harboring the instrumental variants were also investigated. A total of 65 471 cancer patients were included. We identified a significant association between elevated PLTs (per 100 × 109/L) and inferior OS (HR: 1.07; 95% CI: 1.04-1.10; p < .001). Similar significant associations were observed for several cancer types. We further observed a U-shaped relationship between PLTs and cancer survival (p < .001). Our MR analysis found null evidence to support a causal association between PLTs and overall cancer survival (HR: 1.000; 95% CI: 0.998-1.001; p = .678), although non-linear MR analysis unveiled a potential greater detrimental effect at lower PLT range. Expression of eleven PLT-related genes were associated with cancer survival. Early detection of escalated PLTs indicated possible occult cancer development and inferior subsequent survival outcomes. The observed associations could potentially be non-linear. However, PLT is less likely to be a promising therapeutic target.
    What is the context? Previous studies have reported inconsistent associations between platelet counts (PLTs) and cancer survival. However, it is unclear whether there is a linear causal effect, as most studies measured PLTs at the time of cancer diagnosis, which could be influenced by the cancer itself.This study aimed to investigate the association and potential causality between pre-diagnostic PLTs and cancer survival outcomes using a large prospective cohort and genetic analysis.What is new? The observational cohort study found a significant association between elevated pre-diagnostic PLTs and poorer overall and cancer-specific survival. We also identified a U-shaped relationship between PLTs and cancer survival, suggesting that both high and low PLTs may be detrimental.The Mendelian randomization analysis did not support a causal effect of PLTs on overall cancer survival, although it hinted at potential non-linear effects at lower PLT ranges.The study also identified several genes (TPM4, PDIA5, PSMD13, TMCC2, ZFPM2, BAZ2A, CDKN2A, GP1BA, TAOK1, CABLES1, and THPO) related to PLTs that were associated with cancer survival.What is the impact? The findings suggest that early detection of elevated PLTs may indicate occult cancer development and poorer subsequent survival outcomes. However, PLTs are less likely to be a promising therapeutic target for improving cancer survival, as the observed associations could be influenced by confounding factors.The study highlights the need for further research into the complex relationship between PLTs and cancer prognosis, as well as the exploration of other platelet-related traits as potential drug targets.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在韩国,从2001年到2021年,癌症发病率增加了56.5%。然而,与2001年至2005年相比,2017年至2021年的5年癌症生存率增加了17.9%。癌症生存率随着社会经济地位的降低而下降,不同癌症类型之间的存活率存在差异。分析癌症患者生存的社会经济模式可以帮助识别高危人群,并确保他们从干预措施中受益。
    本研究的目的是分析被诊断为六种类型胃癌的患者的生存率差异,结直肠,肝脏,乳房,子宫颈,和肺癌-基于韩国全国数据的社会经济地位。
    这项研究使用与国家健康信息数据库链接的韩国中央癌症登记数据库,对2014年至2018年12月31日期间诊断为癌症的患者进行随访。生成了按收入状况分层的Kaplan-Meier曲线,并对每种癌症类型进行对数秩检验,以评估统计学显著性.使用Cox比例风险回归模型计算任何原因的总生存期的95%CI的风险比。
    六种不同类型癌症的存活率如下:胃癌,69.6%(96,404/138,462);结直肠癌,66.6%(83,406/125,156);肝癌,33.7%(23,860/70,712);肺癌,30.4%(33,203/109,116);乳腺癌,91.5%(90,730/99,159);和宫颈癌,78%(12,930/16,580)。在将医疗援助组与最高收入组进行比较时,胃癌的风险比为1.72(95%CI1.66-1.79),结直肠癌1.60(95%CI1.54-1.56),肝癌1.51(95%CI1.45-1.56),肺癌为1.56(95%CI1.51-1.59),2.19(95%CI2.01-2.38)用于乳腺癌,宫颈癌为1.65(95%CI1.46-1.87)。较高的剥夺指数和晚期诊断阶段与死亡风险增加相关。
    社会经济地位在几种癌症类型中显著调节癌症生存率的差异。这种效应在不太致命的癌症如乳腺癌中尤其明显。因此,考虑到癌症的类型和社会经济因素,社会和医疗干预措施,如早期癌症检测和适当的治疗对于弱势群体是必要的。
    UNASSIGNED: In South Korea, the cancer incidence rate has increased by 56.5% from 2001 to 2021. Nevertheless, the 5-year cancer survival rate from 2017 to 2021 increased by 17.9% compared with that from 2001 to 2005. Cancer survival rates tend to decline with lower socioeconomic status, and variations exist in the survival rates among different cancer types. Analyzing socioeconomic patterns in the survival of patients with cancer can help identify high-risk groups and ensure that they benefit from interventions.
    UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to analyze differences in survival rates among patients diagnosed with six types of cancer-stomach, colorectal, liver, breast, cervical, and lung cancers-based on socioeconomic status using Korean nationwide data.
    UNASSIGNED: This study used the Korea Central Cancer Registry database linked to the National Health Information Database to follow up with patients diagnosed with cancer between 2014 and 2018 until December 31, 2021. Kaplan-Meier curves stratified by income status were generated, and log-rank tests were conducted for each cancer type to assess statistical significance. Hazard ratios with 95% CIs for any cause of overall survival were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression models with the time since diagnosis.
    UNASSIGNED: The survival rates for the six different types of cancer were as follows: stomach cancer, 69.6% (96,404/138,462); colorectal cancer, 66.6% (83,406/125,156); liver cancer, 33.7% (23,860/70,712); lung cancer, 30.4% (33,203/109,116); breast cancer, 91.5% (90,730/99,159); and cervical cancer, 78% (12,930/16,580). When comparing the medical aid group to the highest income group, the hazard ratios were 1.72 (95% CI 1.66-1.79) for stomach cancer, 1.60 (95% CI 1.54-1.56) for colorectal cancer, 1.51 (95% CI 1.45-1.56) for liver cancer, 1.56 (95% CI 1.51-1.59) for lung cancer, 2.19 (95% CI 2.01-2.38) for breast cancer, and 1.65 (95% CI 1.46-1.87) for cervical cancer. A higher deprivation index and advanced diagnostic stage were associated with an increased risk of mortality.
    UNASSIGNED: Socioeconomic status significantly mediates disparities in cancer survival in several cancer types. This effect is particularly pronounced in less fatal cancers such as breast cancer. Therefore, considering the type of cancer and socioeconomic factors, social and medical interventions such as early cancer detection and appropriate treatment are necessary for vulnerable populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这是浙江省癌症长期生存的全面概述,中国。混合分析,队列和周期分析的结合,已被提议得出最新的癌症生存率估计。使用这种方法,我们的目的是及时准确地分析浙江省癌症登记的5年相对生存率(RS)和净生存率(NS),中国。
    浙江省14个癌症登记处共纳入了2013-2017年诊断的255,725例新癌症病例。中国,随访至2019年底。混合分析用于计算2018-2019年按性别划分的总体和分层的5年RS和5年NS,癌症类型,区域,和诊断时的年龄。
    在2018-2019年期间,浙江整体癌症的年龄标准化5年RS和NS分别为47.5%和48.6%,分别。女性癌症的年龄标准化5年RS(55.4%)高于男性(40.0%),城市地区的比率(49.7%)高于农村地区的比率(43.1%)。5年RS随着年龄的增长而下降,从<45岁的84.4%到>74岁的23.7%。我们的RS和NS的结果显示出相似的趋势,没有显着差异。年龄标准化5年RS最高的前五名癌症是甲状腺癌(96.0%),乳腺癌(84.3%),睾丸癌(79.9%),前列腺癌(77.2%),膀胱癌(70.6%),年龄标准化5年RS最低的五种癌症是胰腺癌(6.0%),肝癌(15.6%),胆囊癌(17.1%),食管癌(22.7%),和白血病(31.0%)。
    我们报告了浙江省最新的5年癌症RS和NS,中国第一次,并发现2018-2019年浙江省癌症患者的5年生存率相对较高。基于人群的癌症登记处被认为是可用于评估癌症预防战略的影响和卫生系统有效性的关键政策工具。
    UNASSIGNED: This is a comprehensive overview of long-term cancer survival in Zhejiang Province, China. Hybrid analysis, a combination of cohort and period analysis, has been proposed to derive up-to-date cancer survival estimates. Using this approach, we aimed to timely and accurately analyze the 5-year relative survival (RS) and net survival (NS) in cancer registries of Zhejiang Province, China.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 255,725 new cancer cases diagnosed during 2013-2017 were included in 14 cancer registries in Zhejiang Province, China, with a follow-up on vital status until the end of 2019. The hybrid analysis was used to calculate the 5-year RS and 5-year NS during 2018-2019 for overall and stratifications by sex, cancer type, region, and age at diagnosis.
    UNASSIGNED: During 2018-2019, the age-standardized 5-year RS and NS for overall cancer in Zhejiang was 47.5% and 48.6%, respectively. The age-standardized 5-year RS for cancers of women (55.4%) was higher than that of men (40.0%), and the rate of urban areas (49.7%) was higher than that of rural areas (43.1%). The 5-year RS declined along with age, from 84.4% for ages <45 years to 23.7% for ages >74 years. Our results of the RS and NS showed the similar trend and no significant difference. The top five cancers with top age-standardized 5-year RS were thyroid cancer (96.0%), breast cancer (84.3%), testicular cancer (79.9%), prostate cancer (77.2%), and bladder cancer (70.6%), and the five cancers with the lowest age-standardized 5-year RS were pancreatic cancer (6.0%), liver cancer (15.6%), gallbladder cancer (17.1%), esophageal cancer (22.7%), and leukemia (31.0%).
    UNASSIGNED: We reported the most up-to-date 5-year cancer RS and NS in Zhejiang Province, China for the first time, and found that the 5-year survival for cancer patients in Zhejiang during 2018-2019 was relatively high. The population-based cancer registries are recognized as key policy tools that can be used to evaluate both the impact of cancer prevention strategies and the effectiveness of health systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺癌是癌症相关死亡率的主要原因,非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)占所有肺癌病例的85%。这种恶性肿瘤的特点是多因素的危险因素,预后不良,和可悲的临床结果。大量证据表明,由于个体之间遗传多态性引入的遗传变异,肺癌易感性和生存率存在个体差异。间接影响肺癌易感性和患者生存率。在过去的几十年里,肿瘤环境中的免疫景观和宿主免疫反应一直被认为是NSCLC发展和患者生存的决定因素。随着非小细胞肺癌治疗模式向免疫治疗的转变,人们越来越认识到免疫系统在癌症发展和生存中的作用,检测与NSCLC风险和预后相关的免疫调节标志物中的单核苷酸多态性(SNPs)至关重要.尽管广泛的研究报道了SNP在预测NSCLC的风险和生存率中的意义。之前尚未对调节NSCLC免疫应答的基因中的SNP进行综述。因此,这篇综述揭示了免疫调节标记的遗传多态性的证据,包括免疫检查点,免疫检查点抑制剂,趋化因子,白细胞介素,人类白细胞抗原及其受体,和抗原呈递机制基因,以及它们在易感性中的意义,NSCLC的预后和生存。与NSCLC风险和生存相关的遗传因素的鉴定为更深入地理解疾病的发病机制和进展提供了宝贵的信息。还可以改善早期和晚期疾病的预后和个性化临床护理。
    Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-associated mortality and non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) constitutes 85 % of all lung cancer cases. This malignancy is characterized by multifactorial risk factors, poor prognosis, and deplorable clinical outcome. Considerable evidence indicates that there is inter-individual variability in the lung cancer predisposition and survival due to genetic variations introduced by genetic polymorphisms between individuals, indirectly affecting the lung cancer susceptibility and the patient survival. In the past decades, immune landscape in the tumour environment and host immune response are constantly implicated as determining factor in NSCLC development and patients\' survival. With the change of paradigm in NSCLC treatment to immunotherapy and increasing recognition of the role of the immune system in cancer development and survival, the inspection of single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in immunomodulated markers associated with the risk and prognosis for NSCLC is crucial. Despite extensive studies reported the implication of SNPs in predicting the risk and survival of NSCLC. SNPs in the genes that modulate immune response in NSCLC have not been reviewed before. Hence, this review uncovers the evidence on the genetic polymorphisms of immunomodulatory markers which include immune checkpoints, immune checkpoint inhibitors, chemokines, interleukins, human leukocyte antigen and its receptors, and antigen presenting machinery genes, and their significance in the susceptibility, prognosis and survival in NSCLC. The identification of genetic factors associated with NSCLC risk and survival provides invaluable information for a greater comprehension of the pathogenesis and progression of the disease, also to refine prognosis and personalize clinical care in early and advanced-stages disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号