CONCLUSIONS: Over the past few decades, hypertension (HTN) has affected both young and old people. The public health problem has an enormous economic impact on societies as well. The present review aimed to understand and compare the differences from the available literature on HTN treatment at the primary care level in various states and at the national level in India. We reviewed the latest international, national, and state guidelines/protocols available for the treatment of HTN. In addition, we also searched the PubMed database with relevant Medical Subject Headings terms and included the articles published in the last 5 years. A total of 204 articles were screened and finally, eligible 5 articles were included in the review. International guidelines preferred thiazide diuretics as a drug of choice. While the state protocols and national guidelines preferred calcium channel blockers, followed by angiotensin receptor blockers as the drug of choice. All these guidelines focused on low-dose monotherapy. These guidelines also summarized additional drugs required in case of comorbid conditions. However, the new Essential Medicine List published by the World Health Organization prefers low-dose fixed-drug combination (two-drug regimen) at the primary care level for treatment of HTN. There was not much cost difference between monotherapy and fixed-drug regimens based on the published studies. With due rise in HTN cases, the standardized protocol is ubiquitously needed for better application, comparison, and streamline of the program. Fixed-drug combination therapy can be considered for better control rates among hypertensives by improving adherence and efficacy.

Subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) is a devastating type of stroke, leading to high mortality and morbidity rates. Cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) are common complications following SAH that contribute significantly to the poor outcomes observed in these patients. Intrathecal (IT) nicardipine delivered via an existing external ventricular drain is an off-label intervention that has been shown to be correlated with reduced DCI and improved patient outcomes. The current study aims to characterize the population pharmacokinetic (popPK) properties of intermittent IT nicardipine. Following informed consent, serial cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were obtained from 16 SAH patients (50.4 ± 9.3 years old; 13 females) treated with IT nicardipine every 6 h (q6h, n = 8) or every 8 h (q8h, n = 8) for an average of 72 ± 21 doses. High-performance liquid chromatography was used to quantify CSF concentration from each sample. Our popPK analysis showed that the CSF pharmacokinetics of IT nicardipine in the cohort was adequately described by a two-compartment model with a lag time. Model parameter estimates were reliable (relative standard error <50%). Intracranial pressure influenced both the total clearance and the central volume of nicardipine (i.e., negative correlation, P <-.001). Calculated PK parameters were similar between q6h and q8h dosing regimens. Despite a small cohort of SAH patients, we successfully developed a popPK model to describe the nicardipine disposition kinetics in the CSF following IT administration. These findings may help inform future clinical trials designed to examine the optimal dosing of IT nicardipine.

Objective Real-life management of patients with hypertension and chronic kidney disease (CKD) among European Society of Hypertension Excellence Centres (ESH-ECs) is unclear : we aimed to investigate it. Methods A survey was conducted in 2023. The questionnaire contained 64 questions asking ESH-ECs representatives to estimate how patients with CKD are managed. Results Overall, 88 ESH-ECS representatives from 27 countries participated. According to the responders, renin-angiotensin system (RAS) blockers, calcium-channel blockers and thiazides were often added when these medications were lacking in CKD patients, but physicians were more prone to initiate RAS blockers (90% [interquartile range: 70-95%]) than MRA (20% [10-30%]), SGLT2i (30% [20-50%]) or (GLP1-RA (10% [5-15%]). Despite treatment optimisation, 30% of responders indicated that hypertension remained uncontrolled (30% (15-40%) vs 18% [10%-25%]) in CKD and CKD patients, respectively). Hyperkalemia was the most frequent barrier to initiate RAS blockers, and dosage reduction was considered in 45% of responders when kalaemia was 5.5-5.9 mmol/L. Conclusions RAS blockers are initiated in most ESH-ECS in CKD patients, but MRA and SGLT2i initiations are less frequent. Hyperkalemia was the main barrier for initiation or adequate dosing of RAS blockade, and RAS blockers\' dosage reduction was the usual management.
What is the context? Hypertension is a strong independent risk factor for development of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and progression of CKD to ESKD. Improved adherence to the guidelines in the treatment of CKD is believed to provide further reduction of cardiorenal events. European Society of Hypertension Excellence Centres (ESH-ECs) have been developed in Europe to provide excellency regarding management of patients with hypertension and implement guidelines. Numerous deficits regarding general practitioner CKD screening, use of nephroprotective drugs and referral to nephrologists prior to referral to ESH-ECs have been reported. In contrast, real-life management of these patients among ESH-ECs is unknown. Before implementation of strategies to improve guideline adherence in Europe, we aimed to investigate how patients with CKD are managed among the ESH-ECs.What is the study about? In this study, a survey was conducted in 2023 by the ESH to assess management of CKD patients referred to ESH-ECs. The questionnaire contained 64 questions asking ESH-ECs representatives to estimate how patients with CKD are managed among their centres.What are the results? RAAS blockers are initiated in 90% of ESH-ECs in CKD patients, but the initiation of MRA and SGLT2i is less frequently done. Hyperkalemia is the main barrier for initiation or adequate dosing of RAAS blockade, and its most reported management was RAAS blockers dosage reduction. These findings will be crucial to implement strategies in order to improve management of patients with CKD and guideline adherence among ESH-ECs.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between the systemic use of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) using a diverse nationwide dataset.
METHODS: Retrospective cohort study SUBJECTS: 213,424 individuals aged 40 years and older in the National Institutes of Health (NIH) All of Us dataset, notable for its demographic, geographic and medical diversity and inclusion of historically underrepresented populations. Patients with a diagnosis of POAG prior to use of any kind of anti-hypertensive medication were excluded.
METHODS: Bivariate and multivariable regression analyses were performed to evaluate associations between CCB use and POAG. CCB use was further divided into exposure to dihydropyridine CCBs and non-dihydropyridine CCBs, and subgroup analyses were performed using Chi-square and Fisher\'s tests.
METHODS: Diagnosis of POAG RESULTS: Within our cohort, 2,772 participants (1.3%) acquired a diagnosis of POAG, while 210,652 (98.7%) did not. Among patients who developed POAG, the mean age was 73.3 years, 52.5% were female, and 48.2% identified as White. Among POAG patients, 32.6% used one or more CCB, 28.2% used a dihydropyridine CCB, and 2.2% used a non-dihydropyridine CCB. In bivariate analysis, use of any CCBs was associated with an increased risk of POAG (OR: 1.29, 95% CI: 1.27-1.31, p<0.001). In multivariable analysis adjusting for age, gender, race, ethnicity, and comorbidities such as diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension, use of any CCBs remained associated with an increased risk of developing POAG (OR: 1.52, 95% CI: 1.33-1.74, p<0.001). When stratified by type of CCB, the use of dihydropyridine CCBs (OR: 1.31, 95% CI: 1.14-1.50, p<0.001) was associated with increased POAG risk.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers was associated with a significantly higher risk of developing POAG, both before and while adjusting for demographic factors and comorbid medical conditions.

Resistant hypertension is defined as blood pressure that remains above the therapeutic goal despite concurrent use of at least three antihypertensive agents of different classes, including a diuretic, with all agents administered at maximum or maximally tolerated doses. Resistant hypertension is also diagnosed if blood pressure control requires four or more antihypertensive drugs. Assessment requires the exclusion of apparent treatment resistant hypertension, which is most often the result of non-adherence to treatment. Resistant hypertension is associated with major cardiovascular events in the short and long term, including heart failure, ischemic heart disease, stroke, and renal failure. Guidelines from several professional organizations recommend lifestyle modification and antihypertensive drugs. Medications typically include an angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, a calcium channel blocker, and a long acting thiazide-type/like diuretic; if a fourth drug is needed, evidence supports addition of a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist. After a long pause since 2007 when the last antihypertensive class was approved, several novel agents are now under active development. Some of these may provide potent blood pressure lowering in broad groups of patients, such as aldosterone synthase inhibitors and dual endothelin receptor antagonists, whereas others may provide benefit by allowing treatment of resistant hypertension in special populations, such as non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists in patients with chronic kidney disease. Several device based approaches have been tested, with renal denervation being the best supported and only approved interventional device treatment for resistant hypertension.

Nimodipine, an L-type cerebroselective calcium channel antagonist, is the only drug approved by the US Food and Drug Administration for the neuroprotection of patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Four randomized, placebo-controlled trials of nimodipine demonstrated clinical improvement over placebo; however, these occurred before precision medicine with pharmacogenomics was readily available. The standard enteral dose of nimodipine recommended after aSAH is 60 mg every 4 h. However, up to 78% of patients with aSAH develop systemic arterial hypotension after taking the drug at the recommended dose, which could theoretically limit its neuroprotective role and worsen cerebral perfusion pressure and cerebral blood flow, particularly when concomitant vasospasm is present. We investigated the association between nimodipine dose changes and clinical outcomes in a consecutive series of 150 patients (mean age, 56 years; 70.7% women) with acute aSAH. We describe the pharmacogenomic relationship of nimodipine dose reduction with clinical outcomes. These results have major implications for future individualized dosing of nimodipine in the era of precision medicine.

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are widely used antihypertensive agents due to their effectiveness in reducing blood pressure (BP), along with their good tolerability and evidence of reducing hypertension (HTN)-related cardiovascular and renal diseases. Cilnidipine, a unique dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, exhibits potent inhibitory action on both N-type and L-type voltage-dependent calcium channels. With excellent oral absorption and a prolonged duration of action, it demonstrates a significant antihypertensive effect. It effectively reduces BP both systolic and diastolic while providing renal, neurological, and cardiovascular protection. Unlike L-type CCBs, cilnidipine does not increase pulse rates (PRs) and is associated with reduced occurrence of pedal edema. Cilnidipine is an effective treatment choice for individuals with mild to moderate essential HTN, whether it is administered alone or in conjunction with other treatment modalities.

Amlodipine poisoning is a nightmare for treating clinicians because of the intractable hypotension and bradycardia induced by the drug, which requires a balanced treatment algorithm. We encountered a case of severe Amlodipine toxicity (450 mg) who presented with complaints of nausea, multiple episodes of vomiting, and chest discomfort. On arrival at the EMD, the patient had significant hypotension (80/46 mmHg), bradycardia (40 beats/min), and a fall in oxygen saturation (75 %). He was symptomatically managed with inotropes, IV calcium, IV fluids, and oxygen supplementation. We decided to go forward with Therapeutic Plasma Exchange (TPE) in an attempt to remove the inciting agent. Two sessions of TPE were performed and the patient showed significant improvement post-procedure which led to the discharge of the patient within 10 days of admission. This case report highlights the noteworthiness of TPE in treating significantly high doses of drug poisoning.

BACKGROUND: Currently, most studies primarily focus on directly comparing the efficacy and safety of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and calcium channel blockers (CCBs), the two major classes of antihypertensive drugs. Moreover, the majority of studies are based on randomized controlled trials and traditional meta-analyses, with few exploring the efficacy and safety comparisons among various members of ACEIs and CCBs.
METHODS: ACEIs and CCB were searched for in randomized controlled trials in CNKI, Wanfang, VIP, China Biology Medicine Disc (Si-noMed), PubMed, EMbase, and Cochrane Library databases. The search can be conducted till November 2022. Stata software (version 16.0) and R 4.1.3 was used for statistical analysis and graphics plotting, applying mvmeta, gemtc, and its packages. Meta-regression analysis was used to explore the inconsistencies of the studies.
RESULTS: In 73 trials involving 33 different drugs, a total of 9176 hypertensive patients were included in the analysis, with 4623 in the intervention group and 4553 in the control group. The results of the analysis showed that, according to the SUCRA ranking, felodipine (MD = -12.34, 95% CI: -17.8 to -6.82) was the drug most likely to be the best intervention for systolic blood pressure, while nitrendipine (MD = -8.01, 95% CI: -11.71 to -4.18) was the drug most likely to be the best intervention for diastolic blood pressure. Regarding adverse drug reactions, nifedipine (OR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.14-0.74) was the drug most likely to be the safest.
CONCLUSIONS: The research findings indicate that nifedipine is the optimal intervention for reducing systolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients, nitrendipine is the optimal intervention for reducing diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients, and felodipine is the optimal intervention for safety.

Nifedipine (NIF) is a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker primarily used to treat conditions such as hypertension and angina. However, its low solubility and low bioavailability limit its effectiveness in clinical practice. Here, we developed a cocrystal prediction model based on Graph Neural Networks (CocrystalGNN) for the screening of cocrystals with NIF. And scoring 50 coformers using CocrystalGNN. To validate the reliability of the model, we used another prediction method, Molecular Electrostatic Potential Surface (MEPS), to verify the prediction results. Subsequently, we performed a second validation using experiments. The results indicate that our model achieved high performance. Ultimately, cocrystals of NIF were successfully obtained and all cocrystals exhibited better solubility and dissolution characteristics compared to the parent drug. This study lays a solid foundation for combining virtual prediction with experimental screening to discover novel water-insoluble drug cocrystals.