Caesarean section on maternal request

根据产妇要求剖腹产
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在全球范围内,研究表明,卫生保健专业人员对剖腹产(CS)的决策采取了不同的方法,并且对产妇要求的CS(CSMR)可以被授予的程度的态度差异很大。在专业人士和国家之间。缺乏适当的监管框架是一些国家CSMR率高的一个潜在解释,但总的来说,目前尚不清楚关于CSMR的建议和指南与CSMR费率的关系.在瑞典,从国际比较来看,CSMR率很低,但统计数据显示,在瑞典的21个自治区中,妇产科诊所执行CSMR的程度各不相同。这些地区负责资助和提供医疗保健,虽然国家指导方针为全国各地的职业提供指导;然而,它们不是强制性的。为了进一步了解CSMR请求和现有实践变化的注意事项,目的是分析瑞典所有当地产科诊所关于CSMR的指南文件.
    方法:联系了瑞典的所有43个妇产科诊所,并要求提供有关CSMR的任何指南文件。所有诊所都回答说,进行全面调查。我们使用了演绎和归纳相结合的设计,使用框架方法对多学科健康研究中的定性数据进行分析。
    结果:总体而言,32个妇产科诊所报告了指南文件,11个否认有任何文件。在那些没有报告准则文件的人中,其中一个提到使用国家准则文件。基于框架方法,确定了四个主题类别:CSMR被视为出生恐惧(FOB);决策中的重要因素加权方式尚不清楚;某些地区提供出生合同;产后护理与FOB而不是CSMR有关.
    结论:为了向要求CS的女性提供平等和公正的护理,迫切需要在所有妇产科诊所实施现行的国家指导文件,或者重写指导文件,使诊所能够采用结构化的方法。必须强调探索请求背后的原因,并提供公正的信息和支持。我们的结果有助于正在进行的关于CSMR的讨论,并为进一步的研究奠定了基础,以及利益相关者以及计划怀孕的妇女和孕妇,可以就这个问题发表自己的看法。
    BACKGROUND: Globally, studies illustrate different approaches among health care professionals to decision making about caesarean section (CS) and that attitudes regarding the extent to which a CS on maternal request (CSMR) can be granted vary significantly, both between professionals and countries. Absence of proper regulatory frameworks is one potential explanation for high CSMR rates in some countries, but overall, it is unclear how recommendations and guidelines on CSMR relate to CSMR rates. In Sweden, CSMR rates are low by international comparison, but statistics show that the extent to which maternity clinics perform CSMR vary among Sweden\'s 21 self-governing regions. These regions are responsible for funding and delivery of healthcare, while national guidelines provide guidance for the professions throughout the country; however, they are not mandatory. To further understand considerations for CSMR requests and existing practice variations, the aim was to analyse guideline documents on CSMR at all local maternity clinics in Sweden.
    METHODS: All 43 maternity clinics in Sweden were contacted and asked for any guideline documents regarding CSMR. All clinics replied, enabling a total investigation. We used a combined deductive and inductive design, using the framework method for the analysis of qualitative data in multi-disciplinary health research.
    RESULTS: Overall, 32 maternity clinics reported guideline documents and 11 denied having any. Among those reporting no guideline documents, one referred to using national guideline document. Based on the Framework method, four theme categories were identified: CSMR is treated as a matter of fear of birth (FOB); How important factors are weighted in the decision-making is unclear; Birth contracts are offered in some regions; and The post-partum care is related to FOB rather than CSMR.
    CONCLUSIONS: In order to offer women who request CS equal and just care, there is a pressing need to either implement current national guideline document at all maternity clinics or rewrite the guideline documents to enable clinics to adopt a structured approach. The emphasis must be placed on exploring the reasons behind the request and providing unbiased information and support. Our results contribute to the ongoing discussion about CSMR and lay a foundation for further research in which professionals, as well as stakeholders and both women planning pregnancy and pregnant women, can give their views on this issue.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    根据母婴生理影响的证据,已经宣布了39孕周后未指示剖腹产(CS)的建议。潜在的心理风险尚未得到承认。这项研究旨在调查39周前应母亲要求出生的选择性CS(ECS)的学龄前儿童的情绪和行为问题。
    2008年11月至2010年10月期间,妊娠12周以内的孕妇应邀参加了中国-安徽出生队列研究(C-ABCS)。要求他们在妊娠的第1个月和第3个月分别填写一份自我管理问卷,以收集孕妇的基本特征。从医学笔记中提取了妊娠并发症和分娩方式。他们的单胎活产在学龄前进行了随访。父母完成优势和困难问卷(SDQ)以评估儿童的情绪和行为问题。共有3319对母子进行了最终分析。使用描述性分析和二元逻辑回归分析来评估分娩方式对不同胎龄的SDQ维度异常的影响。
    在39周之前,根据母亲的要求,ECS的患病率,在39-40周,41周后分别为16.6%、23.7%和15.9%,分别。与阴道出生的人相比,应母亲要求出生的ECS患儿更有可能出现总的疑难问题(RR1.519,95%置信区间1.077~2.142).母亲要求的ECS是39孕周之前出生的儿童的情绪问题(3.479,1.676至7.222)和总困难问题(2.172,1.175至4.016)的独立预测因子。
    经母亲要求由ECS分娩的儿童在学龄前39孕周之前出现情绪和行为问题的风险增加。在39周之前的潜在心理影响已被添加到ECS对产妇请求的影响名册中。需要进一步的研究来探索潜在的生物学机制。
    The recommendation of non-indicated caesarean section (CS) after 39 gestational weeks has been announced based on evidence of maternal and infant physiological effects. The potential psychological risks have not been acknowledged. This study aims to investigate emotional and behavioral problems in pre-school children born with elective CS (ECS) on maternal request prior to 39 weeks.
    Pregnant women within 12 gestational weeks between November 2008 and October 2010 were invited to participate in the China-Anhui Birth Cohort Study (C-ABCS). They were asked to complete a self-administered questionnaire respectively in 1st and 3rd trimester of pregnancy to collect basic maternal characteristics. Pregnant complications and delivery modes were abstracted from medical notes. Their singleton live births were followed up at preschool age. Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaires (SDQ) were completed by parents to assess children\'s emotional and behavioral problems. A total of 3319 mother-child pairs were put into the final analysis. Descriptive analysis and binary logistic regression analysis were used to assess the impact of delivery modes on abnormalities in SDQ dimensions at various gestational ages.
    The prevalence of ECS on maternal request prior to 39 weeks, at 39-40 weeks, and after 41 weeks was 16.6, 23.7 and 15.9%, respectively. Compared with those born vaginally, children born with ECS on maternal request were more likely to have total difficult problems (RR 1.519, 95% confidence interval 1.077 to 2.142). ECS on maternal request was the independent predictor of emotional problems (3.479, 1.676 to 7.222) and total difficult problems (2.172, 1.175 to 4.016) in children born prior to 39 gestational weeks.
    Children delivered by ECS on maternal request have an increased risk to have emotional and behavioral problems prior to 39 gestational weeks at preschool age. The potential psychological implication prior to 39 weeks has been added to the roster of impacts of ECS on maternal request. Further research is needed to probe the potential biological mechanisms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate sociopsychological factors of women undergoing a caesarean section on maternal request (CSMR).
    METHODS: Twenty-eight women who underwent CSMR and 29 women with vaginal delivery (VD) filled in standardized questionnaires concerning psychological burden (SCL-R 90), fear of childbirth (W-DEQ, STAI), personality structure (HEXACO-Pi-R) and social support (F-SozU) as well as one questionnaire assessing potential factors influencing their mode of delivery.
    RESULTS: Women with CSMR were older (36.5 ± 5.4 vs. 30.6 ± 5.2 years; p < 0.001) and suffered more from fear of childbirth (W-DEQ 4.3 ± 0.8 vs. 3.7 ± 1.2; p = 0.041), concerns for their child (W-DEQ 2.0 ± 1.5 vs. 1.3 ± 0.7; p = 0.026) and appraised the birth less negative (W-DEQ 2.0 ± 0.7 vs. 2.7 ± 1.1; p = 0.008). The majority of parturients had chosen their preferred mode of delivery before pregnancy (CS 61% vs. VD 82%, p = 0.328). In the decision-making process for the mode of delivery, the advice of the partner (85 and 90%) played an important role. 82% of the women who delivered via CSMR did not regret the decision for this mode of delivery.
    CONCLUSIONS: Women who underwent CS had higher fear of childbirth and appraised the birth less negative. The majority did not regret the decision for the CS and would even choose this mode of delivery for their next pregnancy. Although the partner and the physician seem to be important in the decision process for of the mode of delivery, reasons for the choice for CSMR appear to be multifactorial.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号