OBJECTIVE: The goal of this paper is to summarize the data pertaining to the use of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) for the prevention of cardiotoxicity in patients receiving anthracyclines for cancer treatment. We discuss the potential efficacy of this class of medications, incorporating insights from existing literature and ongoing studies.
RESULTS: SGLT2i are a class of medications which were initially developed for treatment of Type 2 diabetes and later extended to treat heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction regardless of diabetes status. There remains a need for effective and safe treatments to preventing cardiotoxicity in anthracycline-treated patients. It has been proposed that SGLT2i may provide protection against the cardiotoxic effects of anthracyclines. Some of the proposed mechanisms include beneficial metabolic, neurohormonal, and hemodynamic effects, renal protection, as well as a decrease in inflammation, oxidative stress, apoptosis, mitochondrial dysfunction and ion homeostasis. There is emerging evidence from basic science and observational studies that SGLT2i may play a role in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity. Randomized controlled trials are needed to conclusively determine the role of SGLT2 inhibitors as a cardioprotective therapy in patients receiving anthracyclines for the treatment of cancer.

OBJECTIVE: In Ireland, over 3000 patients are diagnosed with breast cancer annually, and 1 in 9 Irish women will be diagnosed with breast cancer in their lifetime. There is evidence that female breast cancer survivors are more likely to die of cardiovascular disease than their age-matched counterparts. Specific services for cancer patients suffering from cancer therapy related cardiovascular toxicity have led to a higher incidence of safe anti-cancer treatment completion. Such services are not widely available in our jurisdiction, and the purpose of this trial is to remedy this situation.
METHODS: This protocol describes a prospective, single arm, pilot feasibility study implementing a dedicated Cardio-Oncology assessment and surveillance pathway for patients receiving multimodal breast cancer treatment. It incorporates novel biomarker and radiomic surveillance and monitoring approaches for cancer-therapy related cardiac dysfunction into routine care for breast cancer patients undergoing adjuvant systemic chemotherapy.
RESULTS: Declaration of results will via peer reviewed academic journals, and communicated directly to key knowledge users both nationally and internationally. This engagement will be critical to enable to healthcare services and policy sector make informed decisions or valuable changes to clinical practice, expenditure and/or systems development to support specialized Cardio-Oncology clinical pathways. All data is to be made available upon request.
CONCLUSIONS: Dedicated cardio-oncology services have been recommended in recent literature to improve patient outcomes. Our protocol describes a feasibility study into the provision of such services for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant chemotherapies for breast cancer (BC) are effective but potentially cardiotoxic, and expose long survivors at risk of chemotherapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). Unfortunately, early screening for CTRCD has actual diagnostic limits. Myocardial extracellular volume (mECV) is a radiological marker used in cardiac CT scans and cardiac magnetic resonance for diagnosis and follow-up of CTRCD. It can be measured in whole-body CT (WB-CT) scan, routinely performed in patients at high risk of relapse, to evaluate CTRCD occurrence during oncological follow-up.
METHODS: 82 WB-CT scans were examined at baseline (T0) and during oncological follow-up at first year (T1) and fifth year (T5) after the end of neoadjuvant treatment. mECV was measured at 1 min (PP) and 5 min (DP) after contrast injection. 31 echocardiograms were retrieved in T1 to perform a linear correlation between mECV and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
RESULTS: mECV values in T0 were similar between the two groups both in PP and in DP. Significant results were found for PP values in T1 (37.0 % vs 32 %, p = 0.0005) and in T5 (27.2 % vs 31.2 %, p = 0.025). A cut-off value of 35 % in PP proved significant in T1 (OR = 12.4, p = 0.004), while mECV was inversely correlated with LVEF both in PP (adj-S = -3.54, adj-p = 0.002) and in DP (adj-S = -2.51, adj-p = 0.0002), suggesting a synergistic action with the age at diagnosis (p < 0.0001, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: WB-CT scans performed during oncological reassessment in patients at high-risk of recurrence could be used for CTRCD screening in cardiovascular low-risk patients, especially in aging patients with mECV values above 35 %.

暂无摘要。

Trastuzumab is widely used in HER2 breast cancer. However, it may cause left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. A decrease in LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) has been previously demonstrated to be a good predictor of subsequent cancer therapy related dysfunction (CTRCD). Left atrial morphological remodeling during Trastuzumab therapy has also been shown. The aim of this study is exploring the relationship between early changes in left atrial function and the development of Trastuzumab-induced cardiotoxicity. Consecutive patients with diagnosis of HER2+non-metastatic breast cancer treated with Trastuzumab were prospectively enrolled. A clinical, conventional, and advanced echocardiographic assessment was performed at baseline and every three months, until a one-year follow-up was reached. One-hundred-sixteen patients completed the 12 months follow-up, 10 (9%) cases of CTRCD were observed, all after the sixth month. GLS and LVEF significantly decreased in the CTRCD group at 6 months of follow-up, with an earlier (3 months) significant worsening in left atrial morpho-functional parameters. Systolic blood pressure, early peak atrial longitudinal strain (PALS), peak atrial contraction (PACS) and left atrial volume (LAVI) changes resulted independent predictors of CTRCD at multivariable logistic regression analysis. Moreover, early changes in PALS and PACS resulted good predictors of CTRCD development (AUC 0.85; p = 0.008, p < 0.001 and 0.77; p = 0.008, respectively). This prospective study emphasizes that the decline in PALS and PACS among trastuzumab-treated patients could possibly increase the accuracy in identifying future CTRCD in non-metastatic HER2 breast cancer cases, adding predictive value to conventional echocardiographic assessment.

BACKGROUND: Anthracyclines can cause left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. There is little data about right ventricular (RV) damage during chemotherapy.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the toxic effects of chemotherapy, analyzing its impact on right ventricular function.
METHODS: A prospective study was conducted, enrolling 83 female patients (55 ± 11 years old) affected by breast cancer treated with anthracyclines. Cardiological evaluation, HFA risk score assessment and comprehensive echocardiogram, including speckle tracking analysis and 3D analysis, were performed before starting chemotherapy (T0) and at 3 (T1), 6 (T2) and 12 months (T3) after beginning treatment. RV function was assessed with tricuspid annular plane excursion (TAPSE), S\' wave of the tricuspid annulus, fractional area change (FAC), RV global longitudinal strain (RV-GLS), free wall strain (RV-FWLS) and RV 3D ejection fraction (RV-3DEF). Subclinical LV CTRCD was defined as a reduction of GLS > 15% compared to baseline. Subclinical RV cardiotoxicity was defined as the co-presence of a relative decrease of 10% from baseline in RV-3DEF and a relative reduction of 15% from baseline RV-FWLS.
RESULTS: After chemotherapy, we found a significant reduction in 2D-LVEF (p =  < 0.001) and 3D-LVEF (p =  < 0.001), in LV-GLS and RVLS (p =  < 0.001), in FAC and TAPSE, also RV-3DEF reduced significantly (p = 0.002). 39% of patients developed LV subclinical CTRCD; 28% of patients developed RV subclinical cardiotoxicity. LV and RV changes occurred concomitantly, and no RV echocardiographic parameters were found to predict the development of LV CTRCD and vice-versa.
CONCLUSIONS: After anthracyclines-based chemotherapy, LV and RV subclinical damage occurs, and it can be detected early by speckle-tracking and 3D echocardiography.

Purpose: The goal of this study was to develop a fully convolutional network (FCN) tool to automatedly segment the left-ventricular (LV) myocardium in displacement encoding with stimulated echoes MRI. The segmentation results are used for LV chamber quantification and strain analyses in breast cancer patients susceptible to cancer therapy-related cardiac dysfunction (CTRCD). Approach: A DeepLabV3+ FCN with a ResNet-101 backbone was custom-designed to conduct chamber quantification on 45 female breast cancer datasets (23 training, 11 validation, and 11 test sets). LV structural parameters and LV ejection fraction (LVEF) were measured, and myocardial strains estimated with the radial point interpolation method. Myocardial classification validation was against quantization-based ground-truth with computations of accuracy, Dice score, average perpendicular distance (APD), Hausdorff-distance, and others. Additional validations were conducted with equivalence tests and Cronbach\'s alpha (C-α) intraclass correlation coefficients between the FCN and a vendor tool on chamber quantification and myocardial strain computations. Results: Myocardial classification results against ground-truth were Dice=0.89, APD=2.4  mm, and accuracy=97% for the validation set and Dice=0.90, APD=2.5  mm, and accuracy=97% for the test set. The confidence intervals (CI) and two one-sided t-test results of equivalence tests between the FCN and vendor-tool were CI=-1.36% to 2.42%, p-value < 0.001 for LVEF (58±5% versus 57±6%), and CI=-0.71% to 0.63%, p-value < 0.001 for longitudinal strain (-15±2% versus -15±3%). Conclusions: The validation results were found equivalent to the vendor tool-based parameter estimates, which show that accurate LV chamber quantification followed by strain analysis for CTRCD investigation can be achieved with our proposed FCN methodology.

Cardiotoxicity associated with chemotherapy, also known as Cancer Therapy-Related Cardiac Dysfunction (CTRCD), affects 10% of patients undergoing chemotherapy and is the most undesirable side effect of chemotherapy. Over time, it is anticipated that there would be an increase in the number of cancer patients receiving treatments that could harm their cardiovascular systems. Physicians should choose whether to continue, halt, delay, or reduce the dose of chemotherapeutic drugs to reduce the impact of cardiotoxicity. Cardiotoxicity screening and diagnosis need a variety of methods, primarily echocardiography to evaluate Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) and Global Longitudinal Strain (GLS). Depending on the clinical state, these procedures may be carried out prior to, during, or following chemotherapy. It\'s critical to reduce cardiovascular risk factors and offer advice on leading a healthy lifestyle before giving cancer patients medicines. There are a lot of cancer treatment facilities all around the world that don\'t have evidence-based perspective cardiotoxicity scores to stratify the risk of cardiovascular problems caused by cancer therapy. Additionally, comorbid conditions like diabetes and hypertension are frequently present in cancer patients, which can have a significant impact on clinical outcomes and cancer treatment. Therefore, this article aims to discuss assessment methods, clinical practice guidance, and prevention of CTRCD.

BACKGROUND: The benefits in survivorship gained with anthracycline (ANT)-based chemotherapies for breast cancer are unfortunately mitigated for some patients by irreversible cardiotoxicity. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) have explored multiple cardioprotection options, however, it remains unclear which drug is most effective in preserving left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). This study aimed to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis, using Bayesian and frequentist approaches, of RCTs evaluating cardioprotective agents.
METHODS: Two authors searched four databases (CENTRAL, Cochrane Reviews, MEDLINE, SCOPUS), to find RCTs evaluating cardioprotective agents. Trial populations were limited to patients with breast cancer without prior ANT exposure. The primary outcome was mean LVEF change pre and post ANT dosing. Our primary analysis utilised a Bayesian approach, while our sensitivity analysis used frequentist methodology (Prospero registration number CRD42020199580).
RESULTS: From 4,007 search results, we identified 12 RCTs, with their various trial arms considered separately-nine beta-blocker (BB), two angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor /angiotensin receptor blockers [(AA)+BB=AABB], one AA, one spironolactone, one statin-evaluating 1,126 patients (age 50.5 years). Bayesian network meta-analysis showed no difference in LVEF preservation between AA (1.3%, 95% credible interval [-0.20, 2.9]), BB (0.77, [-0.21, 1.8]), AABB (0.84 [-1.1, 2.8]), spironolactone (0.72, [-2.3, 3.7]) or statin (0.60, [-2.4, 3.6]) when compared against placebo. However, the frequentist analysis showed benefits from using AA (mean difference, 1.32% [0.32, 2.33]) and BB (mean difference, 0.76% [0.12, 1.4]).
CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to support prophylactic cardioprotection to prevent EF reduction. However, frequentist analysis suggested that AA or BBs provide cardioprotection. Thus, for those already on other anti-hypertensives, switching to AA or BBs could be considered.

In recent years, important advances have been made in the field of Cardio-Oncology. The 2022 ESC Guidelines on Cardio-Oncology proposed a baseline cardiovascular risk stratification for cancer patients and preventive strategies in patients at high and very-high risk of cardiotoxicity. Cardiovascular toxic effects of anti-cancer drugs are being extensively studied; surveillance programs have been proposed, based on the baseline cardiovascular risk. On the other hand, there is little data on Cardio-Oncological management of patients at high and very-high cardiovascular risk with previous cardiovascular diseases. For example, little is known about management of cancer patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), patients with a recent myocardial infarction or other cardiovascular diseases; when to resume anti-cancer drugs after a cardiovascular toxic event. Collaboration between Cardiologists and Oncologists and multidisciplinary team evaluations are certainly essential to decide the best therapeutic strategy for cancer patients, to treat cancer while saving the heart. Therefore, in the present review, we attempt to provide a useful guide to clinicians in treating patients with high and very-high risk of cardiotoxicity by enucleating main questions and answering them based on the evidence available as well as expert opinion and our clinical experience.