CTCAE

CTCAE
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    以下叙述性审查开始全面探索肠道微生物组在饮食-微生物群-免疫(dmi)三方中的作用,旨在增强抗癌免疫治疗的疗效。在彻底改变癌症治疗的同时,对免疫疗法的耐药性和免疫相关不良事件(irAEs)仍然是挑战。肿瘤微环境(TME),由癌细胞形成,影响免疫疗法耐药性。肠道微生物组,受遗传学的影响,环境,饮食,和干预措施,成为TME重塑的关键参与者,从而调节免疫反应和治疗结果。地中海饮食等饮食模式,热量限制修改,和特定的营养成分在影响肿瘤微环境和肠道微生物组以获得更好的治疗结果方面显示出希望。抗生素,破坏肠道微生物多样性,可能会损害免疫疗法的疗效。这篇综述强调需要量身定制的营养策略来操纵微生物群落,增强免疫调节,并提高免疫治疗的可及性,同时最大限度地减少副作用。正在进行的研究调查饮食干预对癌症免疫治疗的影响,指出个性化癌症护理的有希望的发展。这篇叙述性综述综合了现有的知识,并为未来的调查绘制了路线,提出了饮食干预之间动态相互作用的整体观点,肠道微生物组,和癌症免疫疗法在MDI三方内。
    The following narrative review embarks on a comprehensive exploration of the role played by the gut microbiome within the Diet-Microbiota-Immunity (DMI) tripartite, aiming to enhance anti-cancer immunotherapy efficacy. While revolutionizing cancer treatment, resistance to immunotherapy and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) remain challenges. The tumor microenvironment (TME), shaped by cancer cells, influences immunotherapy resistance. The gut microbiome, influenced by genetics, environment, diet, and interventions, emerges as a critical player in TME reshaping, thereby modulating immune responses and treatment outcomes. Dietary patterns like the Mediterranean diet, caloric restriction modifications, and specific nutritional components show promise in influencing the tumor microenvironment and gut microbiome for better treatment outcomes. Antibiotics, disrupting gut microbiota diversity, may compromise immunotherapy efficacy. This review emphasizes the need for tailored nutritional strategies to manipulate microbial communities, enhance immune regulation, and improve immunotherapy accessibility while minimizing side effects. Ongoing studies investigate the impact of dietary interventions on cancer immunotherapy, pointing toward promising developments in personalized cancer care. This narrative review synthesizes existing knowledge and charts a course for future investigations, presenting a holistic perspective on the dynamic interplay between dietary interventions, the gut microbiome, and cancer immunotherapy within the DMI tripartite.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)被用作评估癌症患者化疗不良事件(AE)的工具。由于医疗提供商的CTCAE比患者报告的结果(PRO)更低估了AE,国家癌症研究所开发了PRO-CTCAE。本研究调查了医疗提供者使用CTCAE检测到的症状与乳腺癌患者使用PRO-CTCAE检测到的症状之间的差异。
    方法:患者术前或术后接受包含表柔比星和环磷酰胺的化疗。AE使用4份问卷进行评估:PRO-CTCAE,CTCAE,欧洲癌症研究和治疗组织-生活质量问卷(EORTC-QLQ-30),化疗1、2和3个疗程后,医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)。
    结果:登记了42例患者。关于心理症状的识别,比如疲劳,焦虑,和沮丧,和主观症状,包括心悸和呼吸急促,使用PRO-CTCAE的PRO显着高于使用CTCAE的医疗提供者认可的结果。关于方案特异性症状的识别,比如呕吐,恶心,食欲下降,医疗提供者认可的结果与PRO相同或高于PRO。在QLQ-C30中,身体和角色功能,2个和3个疗程的化疗后,疲劳和呼吸困难明显恶化。J.Med.投资。71:82-91,二月,2024.
    BACKGROUND: The Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) is used as a tool to evaluate the adverse events (AE) of chemotherapy in cancer patients. Since CTCAE by medical providers underestimates AE more than patient-reported outcomes (PRO), the National Cancer Institute developed PRO-CTCAE. The present study investigated differences between symptoms detected using CTCAE by medical providers and PRO-CTCAE by breast cancer patients.
    METHODS: Patients received chemotherapy comprising epirubicin and cyclophosphamide pre- or postoperatively. AE were evaluated using 4 questionnaires:PRO-CTCAE, CTCAE, the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC-QLQ-30), and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) after 1, 2, and 3 courses of chemotherapy.
    RESULTS: Forty-two patients were registered. Regarding the recognition of psychological symptoms, such as fatigue, anxiety, and discouragement, and subjective symptoms, including heart palpitations and shortness of breath, PRO using PRO-CTCAE was significantly higher than medical provider-recognized outcomes using CTCAE. Concerning the recognition of regimen-specific symptoms, such as vomiting, nausea, and decreased appetite, medical provider- recognized outcomes were the same or higher than PRO. In QLQ-C30, the physical and role functions, fatigue and dyspnea significantly worsened after 2 and 3 courses of chemotherapy. J. Med. Invest. 71 : 82-91, February, 2024.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    使用患者报告的结果(PRO)已被证明可以提高症状收集的准确性,并改善总体生存率和生活质量。这是第一项比较两种PRO工具的一致性和患者偏好的研究:患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准(PRO-CTCAE®)和改编的REQUITE肺问卷。
    在三级癌症中心门诊就诊时,肺癌患者被招募参加研究。临床医生报告的结果是通过CTCAEv4.03的初始患者评估产生的。然后,参与者完成了PRO-CTCAE®和适应性问卷。通过计算Pearson相关系数评估2份问卷之间的一致性。PRO-CTCAE®和CTCAE的一致性通过从有序逻辑回归的线性预测因子计算Pearson相关系数来证明。还计算了P值。
    在接诊的74名患者中,65提供了参与研究的书面知情同意书。63例(96.9%)患者完成了PRO-CTCAE®和适应性要求问卷。PRO工具之间的皮尔逊相关系数为0.8-0.83(p<.001)。CTCAE和PRO-CTCAE®之间的相关性在0.66-0.82之间(p<.001)。所有症状在0.79-0.91之间的适应-必需和CTCAE相关性更高(p<.001)。对于REQUITE,一个等级内的可接受差异存在于96.8%-100%的症状域中,对于PRO-CTCAE®中的所有领域,存在于92.1%-96.8%。由于问题的主观性降低和易于使用,因此总参与者队列的54%赞成适应性要求问卷。
    与PRO-CTCAE®相比,适应的-REQUITE问卷显示出与临床医生报告的结果更高的相关性和更高的患者偏好。这项研究的结果表明,在常规临床实践中,对肺癌患者使用REQUITE问卷。
    UNASSIGNED: The use of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) has been shown to enhance the accuracy of symptom collection and improve overall survival and quality of life. This is the first study comparing concordance and patient preference for two PRO tools: Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE®) and the adapted-REQUITE Lung Questionnaire.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients with lung cancer were recruited to the study while attending outpatient clinics at a tertiary cancer centre. Clinician-reported outcomes were generated through initial patient assessment with CTCAE v4.03. Participants then completed the PRO-CTCAE® and adapted-REQUITE questionnaires. Concordance between the 2 questionnaires was assessed by calculating Pearson correlation coefficient. PRO-CTCAE® and CTCAE concordance was demonstrated by calculating Pearson correlation coefficient from the linear predictors of an ordinal logistic regression. P-values were also calculated.
    UNASSIGNED: Out of 74 patients approached, 65 provided written informed consent to participate in the study. 63 (96.9%) patients completed both PRO-CTCAE® and adapted-REQUITE questionnaires. Pearson correlation coefficient between PRO tools was 0.8-0.83 (p <.001). Correlation between CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE® ranged between 0.66-0.82 (p <.001). Adapted-REQUITE and CTCAE correlation was higher for all symptoms ranging between 0.79-0.91 (p <.001). Acceptable discrepancies within one grade were present in 96.8%-100% of symptom domains for REQUITE and in 92.1%-96.8% for all domains in the PRO-CTCAE®. 54% of the total participant cohort favored the adapted-REQUITE questionnaire due to reduced subjectivity in the questions and ease of use.
    UNASSIGNED: The adapted-REQUITE questionnaire has shown a superior correlation to clinician-reported outcomes and higher patient preference than the PRO-CTCAE®. The results of this study suggest the use of the REQUITE questionnaire for patients with lung cancer in routine clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在接受免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗的黑色素瘤患者中,结肠炎是第三大常见的免疫相关不良反应。由于英国人口的现实数据有限,这项研究是在英国一家医院进行的,该医院引入了新的结肠炎指导来评估总体分级(OG),以评估结肠炎的严重程度并指导治疗.
    目的:本研究旨在通过常见不良事件术语标准(CTCAE)分级和出现时的总体分级来调查结肠炎的严重程度。评估结肠炎治疗和结果以比较这两个类别的影响。
    方法:单中心,对出现结肠炎症状的黑色素瘤患者进行了回顾性观察性研究.
    结果:共纳入44例有结肠炎症状的晚期黑色素瘤患者。结肠炎发病的中位时间为67天(范围4-890)。大多数患者发展为CTCAE量表的G1/G2(70.4%),但总体等级为中度或重度(84.1%)。有65.9%的患者接受类固醇治疗,英夫利昔单抗的比例为38.2%,维多珠单抗的比例为4.5%。结肠炎消退的中位时间为28天(范围0-282)。治疗方式和消退时间均与完全OG(p&lt;0.0001)而不是CTCAE分级(p&gt;0.05)评估的结肠炎严重程度相关。
    结论:本研究提供了关于英国单中心ICI诱导的结肠炎管理的全面描述。更完整的OG被提议对结肠炎患者进行分层,并在出现时指导调查和治疗决策,替换旧的CTCAE分级。
    BACKGROUND: Colitis was the third most common immune-related adverse effect in melanoma patients treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). With the limitation of real-world data in the UK population, this study was conducted in a UK hospital where a fresh colitis guidance was introduced to evaluate the overall grading (OG) to assess colitis severity and guide the treatment.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate colitis severity by Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) grade and overall grade at time of presentation. Colitis treatment and outcome were evaluated to compare the impact of these two categories.
    METHODS: A single-center, retrospective observational study was performed in melanoma patient developing colitis symptoms.
    RESULTS: A total of 44 advanced melanoma patient with colitis symptoms were included. Median time to colitis onset was 67 days (range 4-890). Majority of patients developed G1/ G2 of CTCAE scale (70.4%) but moderate or severe overall grade (84.1%). There were 65.9% of patients treated with steroids, and 38.2% with infliximab and 4.5% with vedolizumab. The median time of colitis resolution was 28 days (range 0-282). Both treatment modality and time to resolution were associated with severity of colitis assessed by complete OG(p<0.0001) rather than CTCAE grading (p>0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study provided a comprehensive description about ICI-induced colitis management in a single center of the UK. The more completed OG was proposed to stratify colitis patient and guide the investigation and treatment decision at presenting time, replacing the old CTCAE grading.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:关节痛,肌痛,和神经性疼痛是由于紫杉醇化疗而观察到的最常见的副作用。这项研究的目的是探讨预防作用,维护,缓解,关节痛的复发,肌痛,加巴喷丁治疗后的神经性疼痛。
    方法:本研究在肿瘤科进行,Dhiraj医院,Vadodara与51名患者的样本。新发现的癌症患者观察到关节痛,肌痛,患者接受紫杉醇引起的神经性疼痛,并使用不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)和疼痛检测问卷进行基线疼痛评估.在出现症状后的第一个周期给予加巴喷丁,在随后的三个周期给予预防性治疗,并在加巴喷丁治疗后进行疼痛评估,以评估症状和预防效果。
    结果:在基线时,神经性疼痛评分为22.7±3.6,在随后的随访中降低至0.01±0.14.2级关节痛,肌痛,和神经性疼痛在基线时更多观察到,在第三个周期中降至0级。通过进行t检验对基线和加巴喷丁治疗后的差异进行统计学分析,t检验显示p值<0.00001,t值小于-2,表明有统计学意义的结果。
    结论:本研究表明加巴喷丁可以减轻神经性疼痛。与对症治疗相比,预防性使用加巴喷丁在快速缓解疼痛方面非常有效。在进一步的后续行动中,据指出,加巴喷丁在整个周期中保持了影响。
    OBJECTIVE: Arthralgia, myalgia, and neuropathic pain are the most common side effects observed due to paclitaxel chemotherapy. The aim of this study was to investigate the prophylactic role, maintenance, remission, and re-occurrence of arthralgia, myalgia, and neuropathic pain post-gabapentin therapy.
    METHODS: This study was conducted in the Department of Oncology, Dhiraj Hospital, Vadodara with a sample of 51 patients. Newly detected cancer patients who observed arthralgia, myalgia, and neuropathic pain due to paclitaxel were taken and a baseline pain assessment was done using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and painDETECT questionnaire. Gabapentin was given in the first cycle after symptoms appeared and prophylactic treatment was given in the subsequent three cycles and evaluation of pain was done post-gabapentin therapy to assess the symptomatic as well as prophylactic effect.
    RESULTS: At baseline, neuropathic pain score was 22.7 ± 3.6 which reduced to 0.01 ± 0.14 on subsequent follow-ups. Grade 2 arthralgia, myalgia, and neuropathic pain were more observed at baseline which reduces to Grade 0 in the third cycle. The difference in baseline and post-gabapentin therapy was statistically analyzed by conducting t-test which showed p-value <0.00001 and t-value was less than -2 which indicated a statistically significant result.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that gabapentin reduces neuropathic pain. Prophylactic usage of gabapentin was highly effective at bringing about quick pain relief when compared to symptomatic treatment. In further follow-ups, it was noted that gabapentin maintained the impact throughout the cycles.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在估计接受调强放射治疗(IMRT)治疗的盆腔癌患者中放射诱发的急性直肠黏膜炎的S形剂量反应(SDR)曲线的拟合参数,以计算正常组织并发症的概率(NTCP)。
    30例宫颈癌患者纳入直肠黏膜炎SDR曲线模型。每周评估患者的急性放射诱导(ARI)直肠粘膜炎毒性,并根据不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE)5.0版进行评分。放射生物学参数,即n,m,根据从宫颈癌患者的临床数据获得的拟合SDR曲线计算TD50和γ50。
    针对终点直肠粘膜炎,计算了宫颈癌患者癌直肠粘膜的ARI毒性。N,m,来自1级和2级直肠粘膜炎的SDR曲线的TD50和γ50参数分别为0.328、0.047、25.44±1.21(置信区间[CI]:95%),和8.36和0.13,0.07,38.06±2.94(CI:95%),和5.15。
    这项研究提出了NTCP计算直肠粘膜炎终点的1级和2级ARI直肠毒性的拟合参数。提供的不同程度直肠黏膜炎的体积与并发症和剂量与并发症的列线图有助于放射肿瘤学家决定限制剂量以减少急性毒性。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to estimate the fitting parameters of sigmoidal dose-response (SDR) curve of radiation-induced acute rectal mucositis in pelvic cancer patients treated with Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for the calculation of normal tissue complication probability (NTCP).
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty cervical cancer patients were enrolled to model the SDR curve for rectal mucositis. The patients were evaluated weekly for acute radiation-induced (ARI) rectal mucositis toxicity and their scoring was performed as per Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. The radiobiological parameters, namely n, m, TD50, and γ50 were calculated from the fitted SDR curve obtained from the clinical data of cervical cancer patients.
    UNASSIGNED: ARI toxicity for rectal mucosa in carcinoma of cervical cancer patients was calculated for the endpoint rectal mucositis. The n, m, TD50, and γ50 parameters from the SDR curve of Grade 1 and Grade 2 rectal mucositis were found to be 0.328, 0.047, 25.44 ± 1.21 (confidence interval [CI]: 95%), and 8.36 and 0.13, 0.07, 38.06 ± 2.94 (CI: 95%), and 5.15, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: This study presents the fitting parameters for NTCP calculation of Grade 1 and Grade 2 ARI rectal toxicity for the endpoint of rectal mucositis. The provided nomograms of volume versus complication and dose versus complication for different grades of rectal mucositis help radiation oncologists to decide the limiting dose to reduce the acute toxicities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经授权:我们提供了患者报告的不良事件通用术语标准(PRO-CTCAE),用于接受具有治愈性目的的乳腺癌辅助放疗的患者。我们描述了PRO-CTCAE的频率和严重程度,并根据剂量分级进行了分析。
    UNASSIGNED:如果患者接受了乳腺癌的治愈性治疗,并纳入了前瞻性登记。患者必须完成至少一项基线和一项针对PRO-CTCAE的放射后调查。对于单变量和多变量分析,分类变量采用Fisher精确检验,连续变量采用Wilcoxon秩和检验。通过卡方检验分析接受低分割(HF)与标准常规分割(CF)治疗的患者之间的PRO-CTCAE项目等级≥2和≥3。
    未经授权:符合纳入标准的患者有3131例。309例(94%)患者的病理肿瘤分期为T1-T2。87例(29%)患者为淋巴结阳性。二百四十七例患者(75%)经历了任何PRO-CTCAE等级≥2,92例(28%)患者经历了任何PRO-CTCAE等级≥3。发现CF与≥3级皮肤毒性的风险增加有关,吞咽,恶心(均p<0.01)。在多变量模型中,HF(OR0.48,p<0.01)显着降低了PRO-CTCAE≥3的发生风险。
    UNASSIGNED:我们的研究报告了首次将多个PRO-CTCAE项目用于乳腺癌患者接受放射治疗并具有治愈性目的的临床经验之一。与CF相比,多变量分析后,HF与任何PRO-CTCAE≥3的显着降低相关。
    UNASSIGNED: We present Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) for patients undergoing adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer with curative intent. We describe the frequency and severity of PRO-CTCAE and analyze them with respect to dose fractionation.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients were included in this study if they were treated with curative intent for breast cancer and enrolled on a prospective registry. Patients must have completed at least one baseline and one post-radiation survey that addressed PRO-CTCAE. For univariate and multivariate analysis, categorical variables were analyzed by Fisher\'s exact test and continuous variables by Wilcoxon rank sum test. PRO-CTCAE items graded ≥2 and ≥3 were analyzed between patients who received hypofractionation (HF) versus standard conventional fractionation (CF) therapy by the Chi-square test.
    UNASSIGNED: Three hundred thirty-one patients met inclusion criteria. Pathologic tumor stage was T1-T2 in 309 (94%) patients. Eighty-seven (29%) patients were node positive. Two hundred forty-seven patients (75%) experienced any PRO-CTCAE grade ≥2, and 92 (28%) patients experienced any PRO-CTCAE grade ≥3. CF was found to be associated with an increased risk of grade ≥3 skin toxicity, swallowing, and nausea (all p < 0.01). HF (OR 0.48, p < 0.01) was significant in the multivariate model for decreased risk of any occurrence of PRO-CTCAE ≥3.
    UNASSIGNED: Our study reports one of the first clinical experiences utilizing multiple PRO-CTCAE items for patients with breast cancer undergoing radiation therapy with curative intent. Compared with CF, HF was associated with a significant decrease in any PRO-CTCAE ≥3 after multivariate analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    未经授权:全身性糖皮质激素是自身免疫性水疱性疾病的一线治疗选择;然而,它们的长期使用与显著的毒性有关。
    UNASSIGNED:评估类固醇保护剂的副作用,并将其与类固醇的副作用进行比较。
    UNASSIGNED:我们搜索了Cochrane评论,Embase,MEDLINE,和Scopus在1978年10月至2020年5月之间使用关键字“大疱性类天疱疮,\"\"天疱疮,“\”自身免疫性水疱疾病,“和”副作用。“总共对31项随机对照试验和回顾性病例系列进行了严格评估。
    UNASSIGNED:本综述共包括1685例自身免疫性水疱疾病患者,其中781人患有大疱性类天疱疮,904人患有寻常性天疱疮或叶性天疱疮。
    UNASSIGNED:一个主要的限制是,由于佐剂通常与类固醇结合使用,在所审查的研究中,只有12项纳入了"仅使用类固醇"的研究,以便对副作用进行直接比较.此外,对于每种类固醇保护剂的具体副作用,文献不足且缺乏标准化等级报告.
    未经评估:在未来,研究人员应该考虑实施不良事件通用术语标准,5.0版,用于报告所有副作用,以实现一致性和标准化。具有类似于糖皮质激素毒性指数的指数以量化这些副作用将是有用的。
    UNASSIGNED: Systemic glucocorticoids are first-line treatment options for autoimmune blistering diseases; however, their long-term use is associated with significant toxicities.
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the side effects of steroid-sparing agents and compare them with those of steroids.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched Cochrane Reviews, Embase, MEDLINE, and Scopus between October 1978 and May 2020 using the keywords \"bullous pemphigoid,\" \"pemphigus,\" \"autoimmune blistering diseases,\" and \"side effects.\" A total of 31 randomized controlled trials and retrospective case series were critically appraised.
    UNASSIGNED: This review includes a total of 1685 patients with autoimmune blistering diseases, of whom 781 had bullous pemphigoid and 904 had either pemphigus vulgaris or pemphigus foliaceous.
    UNASSIGNED: A major limitation is that because adjuvants are generally used in combination with steroids, only 12 of the studies reviewed included a \"steroid-only\" arm to allow for a direct comparison of side effects. Additionally, there is inadequate literature and lack of standardized grade reporting of specific side effects of each steroid-sparing agent.
    UNASSIGNED: In the future, researchers should consider implementing the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0, for reporting of all side effects to allow for consistency and standardization. It would be useful to have an index similar to the Glucocorticoid Toxicity Index to quantify these side effects.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们在这里描述了在我们的大学医学中心接受regorafenib治疗的11例连续复发的高级别神经胶质瘤患者。大多数患者存在MGMT启动子甲基化(9/11例)。瑞戈非尼在6/11患者中作为二线全身治疗给予,在5/11患者中作为三线或更一线治疗给予。应用周期的中位数为2个,剂量减少5/11。在4/11观察到对治疗的反应(PR在1/11,SD在3/11)。该队列的中位总生存期为16.1个月,中位无进展生存期9.0个月,治疗失败的中位时间为3.3个月。所有患者均注意到任何CTCAE等级的副作用,特此6/11与CTCAE°III-IV反应。高级副作用是皮肤病,心血管,和血液学性质。在肿瘤委员会推荐和治疗开始之间注意到平均治疗延迟57.5天(范围23-119),这是由于在该适应症中用于标签外使用的应用过程。总之,瑞戈非尼治疗复发性高级别神经胶质瘤是一种可行的治疗选择,但由于其副作用显著,因此必须慎重考虑.
    We describe here 11 consecutive patients with recurrence of high-grade glioma treated with regorafenib at our university medical center. The majority of patients had MGMT promoter methylation (9/11 cases). Regorafenib was given as 2nd line systemic treatment in 6/11 patients and 3rd or higher line treatment in 5/11 patients. The median number of applied cycles was 2 with dosage reductions in 5/11. Response to treatment was observed in 4/11 (PR in 1/11, and SD in 3/11). Median overall survival for the cohort was 16.1 months, median progression-free survival 9.0 months, and median time to treatment failure 3.3 months. Side effects of any CTCAE grade were noted in all patients, hereby 6/11 with CTCAE °III-IV reactions. High-grade side effects were of dermatologic, cardiovascular, and hematologic nature. A mean treatment delay of 57.5 days (range 23-119) was noted between tumor board recommendation and treatment initiation due to the application process for off-label use in this indication. In conclusion, treatment with regorafenib in relapsed high-grade glioma is a feasible treatment option but has to be considered carefully due to the significant side effect profile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号