UNASSIGNED: CSMD2 has been reported as a potential prognostic factor in several cancers. However, whether CSMD2 affects bladder cancer (BC) remains unclear.
UNASSIGNED: Public data were obtained from the TCGA (https://cancergenome.nih.gov) databases. CSMD2expression and its prognostic value were analyzed using bioinformatics methods. CSMD2 mRNA level in patients with BC and BC cell lines was evaluated via quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction. CSMD2 protein level in patients with BC was evaluated via immunohistochemistry. BC cell lines T24 and UMUC-3 were selected for loss-of-function assays targeting CSMD2. Cell viability was determined by CCK8 and clone formation experiments. Cell migration and invasion were evaluated using Transwell assays. Furthermore, the transcriptome of UMUC-3 with CSMD2 knockdown was sequenced to analyze potential signaling network pathways. Finally, the TIMER2.0 database was employed to identify the correlation between CSMD2 and immune cells in the tumor microenvironment.
UNASSIGNED: CSMD2 expression was up-regulated in BC tissues compared to adjacent tissues. High CSMD2 expression was associated with poor survival and could serve as an independent predictor for survival in patients with BC. Furthermore, down-regulation of CSMD2 notably restrained the viability, migration, and invasion abilities of T24 and UMUC-3 cells. Moreover, transcriptomic sequencing after CSMD2 knockdown in UMUC-3 cells revealed its involvement in the regulation of the malignant phenotype in BC. Finally, public databases suggest a connection between CSMD2 and immune cell infiltration in BC.
UNASSIGNED: These findings suggest that CSMD2 may promote proliferation and tumorigenicity, and could represent a potential target for improving the prognosis of BC.

The protein encoded by CUB and Sushi Multiple Domains 2 (CSMD2) is likely involved in regulating the complement cascade reaction of the immune system. However, current scientific evidence on the comprehensive roles of CSMD2 in pan-cancer is relatively scarce. Therefore, in this study, we explored the transcriptional level of CSMD2 in pan-caner using TCGA, GEO, and International Cancer Genome Consortium databases. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to investigate the diagnostic efficacy of CSMD2. The Kaplan-Meier Plotter and Oncolnc were used to investigate the correlation between CSMD2 expression and prognosis. Additionally, we analyzed the correlation between epigenetic methylation and CSMD2 expression in various cancers based on UALCAN, as well as, the correlation between CSMD2 and tumor mutational burden (TMB), microsatellite instability (MSI), and tumor neoantigen burden (TNB) in tumors. TIMER2.0 database was employed to investigate the correlation between CSMD2 and immune cells in the tumor microenvironment and immune checkpoints. Based on TISIDB, the correlation between CSMD2 and MHC molecules and immunostimulators was analyzed. Ultimately, we observed with a pan-cancer analysis that CSMD2 was upregulated in most tumors and had moderate to high diagnostic efficiency, and that high expression was closely associated with poor prognosis in patients with tumors. Moreover, hypermethylation of CSMD2 promoter and high levels of m6A methylation regulators were also observed in most cancers. CSMD2 expression was negatively correlated with TMB and MSI in stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD) and stomach and esophageal carcinoma (STES), as well as with tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, and TNB in head-neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSC). In most cancers, CSMD2 might be associated with immune evasion or immunosuppression, as deficient anti-tumor immunity and upregulation of immune checkpoints were also observed in this study. In conclusion, CSMD2 could serve as a promising prognostic, diagnostic and immune biomarker in pan-cancer.

Mutations and copy number variants of the CUB and Sushi multiple domains 2 (CSMD2) gene are associated with neuropsychiatric disease. CSMD2 encodes a single-pass transmembrane protein with a large extracellular domain comprising repeats of CUB and Sushi domains. High expression of CSMD2 in the developing and mature brain suggests possible roles in neuron development or function, but the cellular functions of CSMD2 are not known. In this study, we show that mouse Csmd2 is expressed in excitatory and inhibitory neurons in the forebrain. Csmd2 protein exhibits a somatodendritic localization in the neocortex and hippocampus, with smaller puncta localizing to the neuropil. Using immunohistochemical and biochemical methods, we demonstrate that Csmd2 localizes to dendritic spines and is enriched in the postsynaptic density (PSD). Accordingly, we show that the cytoplasmic tail domain of Csmd2 interacts with synaptic scaffolding proteins of the membrane-associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK) family. The association between Csmd2 and MAGUK member PSD-95 is dependent on a PDZ-binding domain on the Csmd2 tail, which is also required for synaptic targeting of Csmd2. Finally, we show that knock-down of Csmd2 expression in hippocampal neuron cultures results in reduced complexity of dendritic arbors and deficits in dendritic spine density. Knock-down of Csmd2 in immature developing neurons results in reduced filopodia density, whereas Csmd2 knock-down in mature neurons causes significant reductions in dendritic spine density and dendrite complexity. Together, these results point toward a function for Csmd2 in development and maintenance of dendrites and synapses, which may account for its association with certain psychiatric disorders.

The complement cascade plays a role in synaptic pruning and synaptic plasticity, which seem to be involved in cognitive functions and psychiatric disorders. Genetic variants in the closely related CSMD1 and CSMD2 genes, which are implicated in complement regulation, are associated with schizophrenia. Since patients with schizophrenia often show cognitive impairments, we tested whether variants in CSMD1 and CSMD2 are also associated with cognitive functions per se. We took a discovery-replication approach, using well-characterized Scandinavian cohorts. A total of 1637 SNPs in CSMD1 and 206 SNPs in CSMD2 were tested for association with cognitive functions in the NCNG sample (Norwegian Cognitive NeuroGenetics; n=670). Replication testing of SNPs with p-value<0.001 (7 in CSMD1 and 3 in CSMD2) was carried out in the TOP sample (Thematically Organized Psychosis; n=1025) and the BETULA sample (Betula Longitudinal Study on aging, memory and dementia; n=1742). Finally, we conducted a meta-analysis of these SNPs using all three samples. The previously identified schizophrenia marker in CSMD1 (SNP rs10503253) was also included. The strongest association was observed between the CSMD1 SNP rs2740931 and performance in immediate episodic memory (p-value=5×10-6, minor allele A, MAF 0.48-0.49, negative direction of effect). This association reached the study-wide significance level (p⩽1.2×10-5). SNP rs10503253 was not significantly associated with cognitive functions in our samples. In conclusion, we studied n=3437 individuals and found evidence that a variant in CSMD1 is associated with cognitive function. Additional studies of larger samples with cognitive phenotypes will be needed to further clarify the role of CSMD1 in cognitive phenotypes in health and disease.