CRS-HIPEC

CRS - HIPEC
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:为了改善对结直肠腹膜转移(CRC-PM)或腹膜假性黏液瘤(PMP)患者的治疗,荷兰CRS-HIPEC质量注册于2019年启动。目的是描述该注册表的发展和内容,并深入了解最初几年收集的数据。
    方法:注册是荷兰的一个观察性队列。包括来自6家医院的所有CRC-PM或PMP患者,他们打算进行细胞减灭术和腹腔热化疗(CRS-HIPEC)。分析临床数据和结果(包括医院变异)。
    结果:在2019-2022年,889例患者被纳入CRS-HIPEC质量注册表:749例(84%)患有CRC-PM,140例(16%)患有PMP。在51%的CRC-PM患者和94%的PMP患者中同步诊断出腹膜转移。在接受完全CRS的患者中,CRC-PM的中位腹膜癌指数为8(IQR4-13),PMP的中位腹膜癌指数为15(IQR6-26).在639例CRC-PM患者(97%)和108例PMP患者(82%)中实现了完全的细胞减少。HIPEC主要用丝裂霉素C进行(CRC-PM:94%,PMP:92%)。148例CRC-PM患者(22%)和30例PMP患者(23%)发生了主要的术后并发症(Clavien-Dindo等级≥3),90天死亡率为2%。在CRC-PM中,在诊断性腹腔镜/腹腔镜手术的比例方面观察到医院之间的差异,(neo)辅助治疗,造口术的形成和重新入院。
    结论:CRS-HIPEC质量登记处提供了对CRS-HIPEC结果的洞察,并支持旨在改善CRC-PM和PMP患者治疗结果的临床审核和观察性队列研究。
    BACKGROUND: To improve care for patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CRC-PM) or pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP), the Dutch CRS-HIPEC quality registry was initiated in 2019. The aims are to describe the development and content of this registry and to give insight into the data collected during the first years.
    METHODS: The registry is an observational cohort in the Netherlands. All patients with CRC-PM or PMP who intend to undergo cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) from 6 hospitals are included. Clinical data and outcomes (including hospital variation) were analyzed.
    RESULTS: In 2019-2022, 889 patients were included in the CRS-HIPEC quality registry: 749 (84 %) with CRC-PM and 140 (16 %) with PMP. Peritoneal metastases were diagnosed synchronously in 51 % of CRC-PM patients and in 94 % of PMP patients. In patients undergoing complete CRS, the median peritoneal cancer index was 8 (IQR 4-13) for CRC-PM and 15 (IQR 6-26) for PMP. Complete cytoreduction was achieved in 639 CRC-PM patients (97 %) and 108 PMP patients (82 %). HIPEC was mainly performed with mitomycin C (CRC-PM: 94 %, PMP: 92 %). Major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥3) occurred in 148 CRC-PM patients (22 %) and 30 PMP patients (23 %) with 90-day mortality rates of 2 %. In CRC-PM, differences between hospitals were observed regarding proportions of diagnostic laparoscopies/laparotomies, (neo)adjuvant treatment, ostomy formations and re-admissions.
    CONCLUSIONS: The CRS-HIPEC quality registry provides insight into the outcomes of CRS-HIPEC and enables clinical auditing and observational cohort studies aiming to improve treatment outcomes for patients with CRC-PM and PMP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对于接受结肠直肠起源(CRC)的细胞减灭术(CRS)联合腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)的患者,基因突变对预后的影响尚不明确。
    目的:我们旨在以无监督的方式描述遗传分类,以及该患者群体的结果。
    方法:回顾性研究,双机构研究对接受CRS-HIPEC的患者进行了靶向突变数据,中位随访时间为61个月。使用STRINGv11.5进行功能链接分析。使用无监督k均值聚类对具有相似功能意义的基因进行聚类。卡方,Kaplan-Meier,并采用对数秩检验进行比较统计。
    结果:在2007年至2022年期间,64例来自CRC起源的腹膜癌患者接受了CRS-HIPEC,并提取了基因突变数据。我们确定了19个独特的改变基因,KRAS(56%),TP53(33%),和APC(22%)是最常见的改变;12.5%的人共同改变了KRAS/TP53。在创建了一个互动地图后,k均值聚类揭示了三个功能聚类。对三个簇的反应组通路分析显示出独特的通路(1):Ras/FGFR3信号传导;(2)p53信号传导;和(3):NOTCH信号传导。第1组患者中有71%的患者有KRAS突变,中位总生存期为52.3个月(p<0.05)。
    结论:接受CRS-HIPEC的CRC起源的腹膜癌(PC)患者和携带簇1突变(Ras/FGFR3信号)的肿瘤患者的预后较差。路径中断和以集群为中心的观点可能比CRC起源的PC患者的个体遗传改变更影响预后。
    BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of genetic mutations for patients who undergo cytoreductive surgery (CRS) with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) of colorectal origin (CRC) is not well defined.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to describe the genetic classifications in an unsupervised fashion, and the outcomes of this patient population.
    METHODS: A retrospective, bi-institutional study was performed on patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC with targeted mutation data with a median follow-up time of 61 months. Functional link analysis was performed using STRING v11.5. Genes with similar functional significance were clustered using unsupervised k-means clustering. Chi-square, Kaplan-Meier, and the log-rank test were used for comparative statistics.
    RESULTS: Sixty-four patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from CRC origin underwent CRS-HIPEC between 2007 and 2022 and genetic mutation data were extracted. We identified 19 unique altered genes, with KRAS (56%), TP53 (33%), and APC (22%) being the most commonly altered; 12.5% had co-altered KRAS/TP53. After creating an interactome map, k-means clustering revealed three functional clusters. Reactome Pathway analysis on three clusters showed unique pathways (1): Ras/FGFR3 signaling; (2) p53 signaling; and (3): NOTCH signaling. Seventy-one percent of patients in cluster 1 had KRAS mutations and a median overall survival of 52.3 months (p < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of CRC origin who underwent CRS-HIPEC and with tumors that harbored mutations in cluster 1 (Ras/FGFR3 signaling) had worse outcomes. Pathway disruption and a cluster-centric perspective may affect prognosis more than individual genetic alterations in patients with PC of CRC origin.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:已证明增强术后恢复(ERAS)方案可减少住院时间(LOS)和并发症。尚未研究ERAS方案对细胞减灭术和腹腔热化疗(CRS-HIPEC)成本的影响。
    方法:我们对2016-2022年在单个四级中心接受CRS-HIPEC的患者进行了回顾性队列分析。倾向评分匹配用于创建ERAS前后队列。成本,整体和严重的并发症,两组患者的住院时间(LOS)和重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间(LOS)使用Mann-WhitneyU检验的连续变量和χ2检验的分类变量进行比较.
    结果:我们的最终匹配队列包括100名患者,ERAS前后组50例患者。在调整了患者的复杂性和通货膨胀后,总成本中位数[$75,932($67,166-102,645)与$92,992($80,720-116,710),p=0.02]和手术室成本[$26,817($23,378-33,121)与$34,434($28,085-$41,379),p<0.001]在ERAS后队列中显著更高。总发病率(n=22,44%,n=17,34%,p=0.40)和ICU住院时间[2天(IQR1-3)与2天(IQR1-4),p=0.70]在两个队列之间相似。总成本增加22,393美元[SE13,047美元,95%CI(-3178美元至47,965美元),p=0.086]是在实施ERAS后估计的,手术室成本大大促进了这一增长[$8419,SE$1628,95%CI($5228-11,609),p<0.001]。
    结论:CRS-HIPECERAS方案与较高的总成本相关,因为单个机构的手术室成本增加。实施ERAS方案后ICULOS和并发症无显著差异。
    BACKGROUND: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have been shown to reduce length of stay (LOS) and complications. The impact of ERAS protocols on the cost of cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) has not been studied.
    METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC from 2016-2022 at a single quaternary center. Propensity score matching was used to create pre-and post-ERAS cohorts. Cost, overall and serious complications, and intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS) between the two cohorts were compared using the Mann-Whitney U-test for continuous variables and χ2 test for categorical variables.
    RESULTS: Our final matched cohort consisted of 100 patients, with 50 patients in both the pre- and post-ERAS groups. After adjusting for patient complexity and inflation, the median total cost [$75,932 ($67,166-102,645) versus $92,992 ($80,720-116,710), p = 0.02] and operating room cost [$26,817 ($23,378-33,121) versus $34,434 ($28,085-$41,379), p < 0.001] were significantly higher in the post-ERAS cohort. Overall morbidity (n = 22, 44% versus n = 17, 34%, p = 0.40) and ICU length of stay [2 days (IQR 1-3) versus 2 days (IQR 1-4), p = 0.70] were similar between the two cohorts. A total cost increase of $22,393 [SE $13,047, 95% CI (-$3178 to $47,965), p = 0.086] was estimated after implementation of ERAS, with operating room cost significantly contributing to this increase [$8419, SE $1628, 95% CI ($5228-11,609), p < 0.001].
    CONCLUSIONS: CRS-HIPEC ERAS protocols were associated with higher total costs due to increased operating room costs at a single institution. There was no significant difference in ICU LOS and complications after the implementation of the ERAS protocol.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:接受细胞减灭术(CRS)和腹腔热化疗(HIPEC)治疗的结直肠腹膜转移(PM)患者复发的风险很高。了解复发发生的地点和原因是找到降低复发率的解决方案的第一步。尽管弥散加权(DW)MRI并不常规用于CRC患者的随访,在检测(复发)PM的位置和扩散方面,它比CT具有明显的优势。本研究旨在确定CRC患者在CRS-HIPECMRI术后复发的常见部位。
    方法:这是一项单中心回顾性研究,研究对象为2016年1月至2020年8月期间CRS-HIPEC术后复发性PM患者。如果患者术前(MRI1)和疾病复发时(MRI2)均进行了MRI检查,则符合入选条件。两名腹部放射科医生一致审查,并根据其在MRI2上的位置以及与先前影像学上的先前疾病位置(MRI1)和CRS-HIPEC的手术报告的相关性对复发进行分类。
    结果:包括30例患者,原发性CRS-HIPEC时的中位外科PCI为7(范围3-21)。总的来说,在MRI2上检测到68个复发转移,其中14个为腹膜外转移。剩下的54下午,42(78%)发生在由于早期切除或其他外科手术(例如插入的外科腹部引流)而导致腹膜受损的地方。大多数复发转移发现在肠系膜,下腹部/骨盆和腹壁(87%)。
    结论:大多数复发性PMs出现在肠系膜,下腹部/骨盆和腹壁,尤其是腹膜之前受损的地方.
    OBJECTIVE: Patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (PM) treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are at high risk of recurrent disease. Understanding where and why recurrences occur is the first step in finding solutions to reduce recurrence rates. Although diffusion-weighted (DW) MRI is not routinely used in the follow-up of CRC patients, it has a clear advantage over CT in detecting the location and spread of (recurrent) PM. This study aimed to identify common locations of recurrence in CRC patients after CRS-HIPEC with MRI.
    METHODS: This was a single-centre retrospective study of patients with recurrent PM after CRS-HIPEC performed between January 2016 and August 2020. Patients were eligible for inclusion if they had both an MRI preoperatively (MRI1) and at the time of recurrent disease (MRI2). Two abdominal radiologists reviewed in consensus and categorized recurrences according to their location on MRI2 and in correlation with previous disease location on prior imaging (MRI1) and the surgical report of the CRS-HIPEC.
    RESULTS: Thirty patients were included, with a median surgical PCI of 7 (range 3-21) at the time of primary CRS-HIPEC. In total, 68 recurrent metastases were detected on MRI2, of which 14 were extra-peritoneal. Of the remaining 54 PM, 42 (78%) occurred where the peritoneum was damaged due to earlier resections or other surgical procedures (e.g. inserted surgical abdominal drains). Most recurrent metastases were found in the mesentery, lower abdomen/pelvis and abdominal wall (87%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Most recurrent PMs appeared in the mesentery, lower abdomen/pelvis and abdominal wall, especially where the peritoneum was previously damaged.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:中线剖腹手术后切口疝(IH)的发生率从11%到20%不等。细胞减灭术和腹腔热化疗(CRS-HIPEC)可能容易发生疝气,因为对先前接受过腹部手术并增加化疗及其相关不良反应的患者进行了剑突至耻骨的剖腹切口。
    方法:我们对2015年3月至2020年7月前瞻性维护的单一机构数据库进行了回顾性分析。纳入标准为接受CRS-HIPEC的患者,术后随访至少6个月,术后横断面影像学研究。
    结果:研究中纳入了200名患者。所有患者均接受CRS-HIPEC,并切除先前的瘢痕和脐带切除术。54例患者被诊断为IH(26.9%)。多变量分析中IH的主要危险因素是较高的美国麻醉医师协会评分(ASA)(OR3.9,P=0.012),年龄增加(OR1.06,P=0.004)和BMI增加(OR1.1,P=0.006)。大多数疝部位为中位数(n=43,79.6%)。11例(20.4%)患者因造口切口或引流部位而出现外侧疝。大多数正中疝处于切除的脐水平58.9%(n=23)。五名(9.3%)的IH患者需要紧急手术修复。
    结论:我们已经证明,超过四分之一的CRS-HIPEC患者患有IH,其中高达10%可能需要手术干预。需要更多的研究来找到适当的术中干预措施,以最大程度地减少这种后遗症。
    The incidence of incisional hernias (IH) after midline laparotomy varies from 11% to 20%. Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) is potentially prone to hernias because a Xiphoid to pubis laparotomy incision performed on patients who have undergone previous abdominal surgeries with the addition of chemotherapy and its related adverse effects.
    We performed a retrospective analysis on a prospectively maintained single institution database from March 2015 to July 2020. The inclusion criteria were patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC and had at least 6 months postoperative follow-up with post-operative cross-sectional imaging study.
    Two hundred and one patients were included in the study. All patients underwent CRS-HIPEC with resection of previous scar and umbilectomy. Fifty-four patients were diagnosed with IH (26.9%). The major risk factors for IH in multivariate analysis were higher American society of Anesthesiologists score (ASA) (OR 3.9, P = 0.012), increasing age (OR 1.06, P = 0.004) and increasing BMI (OR 1.1, P = 0.006). Most of the hernia sites were median (n = 43, 79.6%). Eleven (20.4%) patients had lateral hernias due to stoma incisions or drain sites. Most of the median hernias were at the level of the resected umbilicus 58.9% (n = 23). Five (9.3%) of the patients with IH necessitated an urgent surgical repair.
    We have demonstrated that more than a quarter of the patients after CRS-HIPEC suffer from IH and up to 10% of them may require surgical intervention. More research is needed to find the appropriate intraoperative interventions to minimize this sequela.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估由根治性手术组成的多模态治疗的安全性和长期结果,术中放疗(IORT),局部晚期直肠癌(LARC)或局部复发性直肠癌(LRRC)和腹膜转移(PM)患者的细胞减灭术和腹腔热化疗(CRS-HIPEC)。方法:本研究为单中心队列研究,包括在LARC三级转诊中心接受这种治疗的所有连续患者,LRRC,和PM。术后并发症,重症监护住院(ICU住院),评估再入院率以及无病生存期(DFS)和总生存期(OS).结果:共有14例LARC和16例LRRC患者被纳入研究。ICU住院时间中位数为1天,57%的患者出现严重的术后并发症。没有观察到90天的死亡率。平均DFS为10.0个月(四分位数范围7.1-38.7),中位OS为31.0个月(四分位数范围15.9-144.3)。结论:由于术后并发症和生存率与LARC或LRRC和PM作为单独程序接受的治疗一致,我们得出的结论是,对于在三级转诊中心选择的LARC或LRRC合并腹膜转移的患者,应考虑采用IORT和CRS-HIPEC联合治疗.
    Purpose: To assess the safety and long-term outcome of a multimodality treatment consisting of radical surgery, intra-operative radiotherapy (IORT), and cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) or locally recurrent rectal carcinoma (LRRC) and peritoneal metastases (PM). Methods: The present study was a single-center cohort study, including all consecutive patients undergoing this treatment in a tertiary referral center for LARC, LRRC, and PM. Postoperative complications, intensive care stay (ICU stay), and re-admission rates were assessed as well as disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). Results: A total of 14 LARC and 16 LRRC patients with PM were included in the study. The median ICU stay was 1 day, and 57% of patients developed a severe postoperative complication. No 90-day mortality was observed. Median DFS was 10.0 months (Interquartile Range 7.1-38.7), and median OS was 31.0 months (Interquartile Range 15.9-144.3). Conclusions: As postoperative complications and survival were in line with treatments that are accepted for LARC or LRRC and PM as separate procedures, we conclude that combined treatment with IORT and CRS-HIPEC should be considered as a treatment option for selected patients with LARC or LRRC and peritoneal metastases in tertiary referral centers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的-比较接受细胞减灭术和腹腔热化疗(CRS-HIPEC)治疗结直肠腹膜转移的患者的患者报告结果(PROs)与接受常规手术的结直肠癌(CRC)患者的PROs。方法-数据来自CAIRO6试验(CRS-HIPEC组)和PROCORE研究(常规手术组)。在基线时比较了9个预定义的PRO(来自EORTCQLQ-C30问卷),在术后早期和术后一年,使用线性混合模型校正全身治疗。结果-总计,包括331例患者:CRS-HIPEC组71例,常规手术组260例。所有预定义的PRO(疲劳、腹泻,C30汇总评分,全球健康状况,物理,角色,情感,认知,和社会功能)在所有三个时间点的组间没有显着差异,随着时间的推移,所有PRO的差异效应在组间没有显著差异。疲劳显著恶化,C30汇总评分,身体和角色功能(两组),术后早期存在认知和社会功能(仅常规手术组)。所有评分在术后一年恢复到基线,除了常规手术组的身体和认知功能。与基线相比,两组术后的情绪功能均得到改善。结论-尽管手术范围更广泛,发病风险更大,结直肠腹膜转移患者的CRS-HIPEC对PROs的负面影响不大于CRC患者的常规手术。Further,全身治疗不影响这些PRO.这些发现可能有助于未来的患者咨询和临床实践中的共同决策。
    Purpose-To compare patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC) for colorectal peritoneal metastases to PROs of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients undergoing conventional surgery. Methods-Data were extracted from the CAIRO6 trial (CRS-HIPEC group) and the PROCORE study (conventional surgery group). Nine predefined PROs (derived from the EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire) were compared at baseline, in the early postoperative period and one year postoperatively, with correction for treatment with systemic therapy using linear mixed modeling. Results-In total, 331 patients were included: 71 in the CRS-HIPEC group and 260 in the conventional surgery group. All predefined PROs (fatigue, diarrhea, C30 summary score, Global Health Status, physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social functioning) did not differ significantly between the groups at all three timepoints, and differential effects over time for all PROs did not differ significantly between the groups. Significant worsening of fatigue, C30 summary score, physical and role functioning (both groups), and cognitive and social functioning (conventional surgery group only) was present in the early postoperative period. All scores returned to baseline at one year postoperatively, except for physical and cognitive functioning in the conventional surgery group. Emotional functioning improved postoperatively in both groups compared to baseline. Conclusion-Despite a more extensive procedure with greater risk of morbidity, CRS-HIPEC in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases did not have a greater negative impact on PROs than conventional surgery in patients with CRC. Further, systemic therapy did not affect these PROs. These findings may facilitate future patient counseling and shared decision making in clinical practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究的主要目的是评估两种流行的全身化疗方法在接受细胞减灭术联合腹腔热化疗(CRS-HIPEC)的结直肠腹膜转移(CPM)患者中的肿瘤学结果。
    方法:我们对因高度或中度结直肠癌而接受CRS-HIPECCPM的连续患者进行了一项双中心回顾性研究。全新辅助治疗(TNT)组患者接受6个月的术前化疗。“三明治”(SAND)化疗组患者接受了3个月的术前化疗,最多术后化疗3个月。
    结果:共有34例(43%)患者纳入TNT组,45例(57%)患者纳入SAND组。TNT和SAND组的中位总生存期(OS)分别为77和61个月,分别(p=0.8)。TNT组患者的无复发生存期(RFS)明显长于SAND组(29vs.12个月,p=0.02)。在多变量分析中,TNT方法与改善的RFS独立相关。
    结论:在这项回顾性研究中,TNT方法与改进的RFS相关,但不是与SAND方法相比的操作系统。需要进一步的前瞻性研究来检查接受CRS-HIPEC的CPM患者的这些全身性化疗方法。
    BACKGROUND: The primary aim of this study is to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of two popular systemic chemotherapy approaches in patients with colorectal peritoneal metastases (CPM) undergoing cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS-HIPEC).
    METHODS: We performed a dual-center retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent CRS-HIPEC for CPM due to high or intermediate-grade colorectal cancer. Patients in the total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) group received 6 months of preoperative chemotherapy. Patients in the \"sandwich\" (SAND) chemotherapy group received 3 months of preoperative chemotherapy with a maximum of 3 months of postoperative chemotherapy.
    RESULTS: A total of 34 (43%) patients were included in the TNT group and 45 (57%) patients in the SAND group. The median overall survival (OS) in the TNT and SAND groups were 77 and 61 months, respectively (p = 0.8). Patients in the TNT group had significantly longer recurrence-free survival (RFS) than the SAND group (29 vs. 12 months, p = 0.02). In a multivariable analysis, the TNT approach was independently associated with improved RFS.
    CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective study, a TNT approach was associated with improved RFS, but not OS when compared with a SAND approach. Further prospective studies are needed to examine these systemic chemotherapeutic approaches in patients with CPM undergoing CRS-HIPEC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:腹膜假粘液瘤(PMP)是一种罕见的临床疾病,其特征是存在粘液性腹水,主要由阑尾黏液性肿瘤穿孔(AMN)引起。由于蠕动运动,小肠的腹膜表面通常不会出现疾病表现。粘液性肿瘤可以作为PMP在整个腹膜上传播,但很少是腔内的。在文学中第一次,我们报告一例累及回肠的腔内PMP。
    方法:对一名75岁男性进行了AMN穿孔和PMP播散,行细胞减灭术和腹腔热化疗。随访期间,患者发生腹膜内复发并在回肠腔内沉积,两种疾病表现都具有相同的KRAS和SMAD4突变。此后,患者接受了姑息治疗.
    结论:该病例说明了这种罕见疾病的生物学和临床行为的变化。临床医生应该意识到PMP的异常肿瘤分布模式,包括小肠内粘液性肿瘤的存在。
    BACKGROUND: Pseudomyxoma peritonei (PMP) is an uncommon clinical condition characterized by the presence of mucinous ascites, mainly induced by perforated appendiceal mucinous neoplasms (AMN). The peritoneal surface of the small bowel is usually spared from disease manifestation due to peristaltic movements. Mucinous tumours can disseminate as PMP on the entire peritoneum, but are rarely intraluminal. For the first time in literature, we report a case of intraluminal PMP involving the ileum.
    METHODS: A 75-year-old male was treated for perforated AMN and disseminated PMP with cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. During follow-up, the patient developed intraperitoneal recurrence together with intraluminal depositions in the ileum, both disease manifestations with identical KRAS and SMAD4 mutations. Hereafter, the patient was treated with palliative care.
    CONCLUSIONS: This case illustrates the variation in the biological and clinical behaviour of this rare disease. Clinicians should be aware of unusual tumour distribution patterns of PMP, including the presence of mucinous tumour within the small bowel.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    PD-L1表达频率和免疫疗法在恶性腹膜间皮瘤(MPM)中的作用尚未得到很好的表征。这项研究的目的是确定MPM患者中PD-L1的表达,并对PD-L1及其在MPM中的生物学行为之间的关联进行探索性分析。
    肿瘤样本是从2018年1月至2020年6月接受手术干预的患者中收集的。标本用抗PD-L1抗体(Dako22c3)染色,并通过肿瘤比例评分(TPS)或组合阳性评分(CPS)≥1%确定阳性。
    从21名患者获得21个样品。21个样本中有16个(76%)是CPS阳性,21个样本中有9个(43%)是TPS阳性。三个样品具有更具侵袭性的双相/肉瘤样组织学和高CPS和TPS(CPS:3、75、95%;TPS:2、60、90%)。在探索性分析中,随着CPS或TPS阈值的增加,有一种生存恶化的趋势。
    MPM的PD-L1表达频率很高,这可能与更具侵略性的肿瘤生物学有关。这些数据为MPM患者中检查点抑制的持续评估提供了基础。
    Frequency of PD-L1 expression and the role of immunotherapy in malignant peritoneal mesothelioma (MPM) have not been well characterized. The purpose of this study was to determine PD-L1 expression in patients with MPM and perform an exploratory analysis for associations between PD-L1 and its biological behavior in MPM.
    Tumor samples were collected from patients undergoing surgical interventions between January 2018 and June 2020. Specimens were stained with anti-PD-L1 antibodies (Dako 22c3) and positivity was determined by tumor proportion score (TPS) or combined positive score (CPS) being ≥1%.
    Twenty one samples were obtained from 21 patients. Sixteen of 21 (76%) samples were CPS positive and 9 of 21 (43%) were TPS positive. Three samples had more aggressive biphasic/sarcomatoid histology and a high CPS and TPS (CPS: 3, 75, 95%; TPS: 2, 60, 90%). On an exploratory analysis, as the CPS or TPS threshold increased, there was a trend towards worse survival.
    MPM has a high frequency of PD-L1 expression, which may be associated with more aggressive tumor biology. These data provide the foundation for continued evaluation of checkpoint inhibition in patients with MPM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号