CPT

CPT
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与儿童虐待(CA)相关的创伤后应激障碍(PTSD)症状的复杂性为有效的心理治疗提供了挑战。因此,人们对心理治疗对这一人群的长期有效性非常感兴趣。目的:本研究旨在探讨治疗终止后9个月,辨证行为疗法(DBT-PTSD)和认知加工疗法(CPT)对PTSD的长期疗效。方法:这是一项DBT-PTSD与CPT(登记号DRKS00005578)随机对照试验的长期分析。最初,193名与CA相关的PTSD患者被随机分配接受DBT-PTSD(n=98)或CPT(n=95)。临床医生管理的DSM-5PTSD量表(CAPS-5)的主要结果是在基线时进行,治疗完成(随机化后15个月)和9个月随访时。次要结果包括自我报告的PTSD严重程度(PCL-5),解离(DSS),临界症状的严重程度(BSL-23),社会心理功能(GAF)。结果:在DBT-PTSD(CAPS:Mpost=15.60,Mfollow-up=14.93)和CPT组(CAPS:Mpost=18.80,Mfollow-up=17.41)中,从干预后到9个月随访的主要(CAPS)和所有其他结果均未观察到显着变化。与CPT相比,9个月随访时的组间分析显着有利于DBT-PTSD,对所有结果的影响范围从CAPS的d=0.35到BSL-23的d=0.57和GAF。结论:我们的结果表明,针对PTSD的复杂表现的心理治疗在治疗终止后9个月持续存在。此外,与治疗终止时发现的CPT相比,DBT-PTSD的优越性,在9个月的随访中得到证实。试验注册:德国临床试验注册标识符:DRKS00005578。.
    本研究调查了创伤后应激障碍(DBT-PTSD)和认知加工疗法(CPT)在治疗终止后9个月对PTSD复杂表现的长期影响。在两个治疗臂中,在广泛的结局中,治疗效果在治疗终止后持续超过9个月.DBT-PTSD在9个月的随访中显示出比CPT的显着优势,差异效应大小在d=0.35和d=0.57之间。
    Background: The complexity of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms related to childhood abuse (CA) present challenges for effective psychotherapeutic treatment. Consequently, there is great interest in the long-term effectiveness of psychological treatments for this population.Objective: This study aims to investigate the long-term outcomes of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for PTSD (DBT-PTSD) and Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) 9 months after treatment termination.Method: This is a long-term analysis from a randomised-controlled trial of DBT-PTSD versus CPT (registration number DRKS00005578). Initially, 193 individuals with CA-related PTSD were randomly allocated to receive either DBT-PTSD (n = 98) or CPT (n = 95). The primary outcome the Clinician-administered PTSD-Scale for DSM-5 (CAPS-5) was administred at baseline, treatment completion (15 months post-randomization) and at the 9-month follow-up. Secondary outcomes included self-reported PTSD severity (PCL-5), dissociation (DSS), severity of borderline symptoms (BSL-23), and psychosocial functioning (GAF).Results: No significant changes were observed in the primary (CAPS) and all other outcomes from post-intervention to 9-months follow-up in both the DBT-PTSD (CAPS: Mpost  = 15.60, Mfollow-up  = 14.93) and CPT group (CAPS: Mpost = 18.80, Mfollow-up = 17.41). Between-group analyses at 9-months follow-up were significantly in favour of DBT-PTSD compared to CPT with small to medium effect sizes on all outcomes ranging from d = 0.35 on the CAPS to d = 0.57 on the BSL-23 and GAF.Conclusions: Our results indicate that treatment effects of psychotherapy addressing complex presentations of PTSD persist 9 months after treatment termination. In addition, the superiority of DBT-PTSD as compared to CPT found at treatment termination, was confirmed at 9-months follow-up.Trial registration: German Clinical Trials Register identifier: DRKS00005578..
    This study investigates the long-term effects of Dialectical Behaviour Therapy for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder (DBT-PTSD) and Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT) on complex presentations of PTSD 9 months after treatment termination.In both treatment arms, treatment effects persisted over 9 months post-treatment termination across a wide range of outcomes.DBT-PTSD showed significant superiority over CPT at 9 months follow-up with differential effect sizes between d = 0.35 and d = 0.57.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究使用fNIRS来确定ADHD患者和通常发育中的儿童之间的个体内变异性和额叶活动之间的关系是否存在差异。共有28名受试者(ADHD患者组14名,对照组14名)参加了这项研究。对受试者进行了K-SADS和智力测试,然后通过连续性能测试测量受试者的额叶活动,使用功能近红外光谱(NIRSIT)。ADHD患者组的处理速度指数明显低于对照组(p=0.04)。CPT检测结果显示患者组右背外侧前额区活动呈正相关,但没有达到统计学上的显著水平。在对照组中,活性与佣金和命中反应时间标准差呈显著负相关(分别为p=.023;p=.063)。与ADHD患者组相反,右侧背外侧前额区的激活与个体内变异性的降低显著相关.该结果表明,ADHD患者组右背外侧前额叶区域的激活与个体内变异性之间的关系显示出与通常发育中的儿童不同的模式。
    This study uses fNIRS to determine whether there is a difference in the relationship between intra-individual variability and frontal lobe activity between ADHD patients and typically developing children. A total of 28 subjects (14 in ADHD patient group and 14 in control group) participated in this study. The subjects were tested for K-SADS and intelligence, and then the frontal lobe activity of the subjects was measured by continuous performance test, using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRSIT). Processing speed index was significantly lower in the ADHD patient group than in the control group (p = .04). The CPT test results showed a positive correlation in the activity of the right dorsolateral prefrontal region in the patient group, but not at a statistically significant level. In the control group, activity showed a significant level of negative correlation with commission and hit reaction time standard deviation (p = .023; p = .063 respectively). In contrary to ADHD patient group, activation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal area was significantly correlated with reduction of intra-individual variability. This result showing that the relationship between activation of the right dorsolateral prefrontal area of the ADHD patient group and intra-individual variability shows a different pattern from typically developing children.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:“时间毒性”的概念已经出现,以解决在医疗保健系统中花费时间的影响;但是,很少有工作研究耳鼻喉科领域的现象。
    目的:验证使用评估和管理(E/M)当前程序术语代码作为评估时间负担的方法,并试用该工具来表征与2016年至2019年之间垂体腺瘤诊断相关的办公室就诊的时间毒性。
    方法:一项门诊就诊的回顾性队列研究,量化了记录就诊长度的时间戳与相关E/M代码就诊长度之间的差异。对IBMMarketScan数据库进行了查询,以确定2016年诊断为垂体腺瘤的患者,并分析他们在2016年至2019年之间的新索赔和退货索赔。采用单因素方差分析和双样本t检验对索赔数量进行检验,时间在办公室,每年的访问时间。
    结果:在验证研究中,通过E/M代码估计的访问时间和实际访问时间差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),E/M代码低估了79.0%的访问所花费的实际时间。在MarketScan分析中,2016年,2099例患者接受了垂体腺瘤的初步诊断.从2016年到2019年,该队列有8490项额外的相关索赔。许多新的办公室访问是内分泌学家(n=857;29.3%)。在办公室花费的总时间逐年减少,从平均113分钟(2016年)到69分钟(2019年)(P<0.001)。
    结论:E/M代码低估了门诊就诊的时间;因此,垂体患者经历的时间毒性可能大于报告。需要进一步的研究来开发额外的时间毒性评估工具,并提高垂体腺瘤患者的护理效率。
    BACKGROUND: The concept of \"time toxicity\" has emerged to address the impact of time spent in the healthcare system; however, little work has examined the phenomenon in the field of otolaryngology.
    OBJECTIVE: To validate the use of Evaluation and Management (E/M) current procedural terminology codes as a method to assess time burden and to pilot this tool to characterize the time toxicity of office visits associated with a diagnosis of pituitary adenoma between 2016 and 2019.
    METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of outpatient office visits quantified differences between timestamps documenting visit length and their associated E/M code visit length. The IBM MarketScan database was queried to identify patients with a diagnosis of pituitary adenoma in 2016 and to analyze their new and return claims between 2016 and 2019. One-way ANOVA and two-sample t-tests were used to examine claim quantity, time in office, and yearly visit time.
    RESULTS: In the validation study, estimated visit time via E/M codes and actual visit time were statistically different (P < 0.01), with E/M codes underestimating actual time spent in 79.0% of visits. In the MarketScan analysis, in 2016, 2099 patients received a primary diagnosis of pituitary adenoma. There were 8490 additional-related claims for this cohort from 2016 to 2019. The plurality of new office visits were with endocrinologists (n = 857; 29.3%). Total time spent in office decreased yearly, from a mean of 113 min (2016) to 69 min (2019) (P < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: E/M codes underestimate the length of outpatient visits; therefore, time toxicity experienced by pituitary patients may be greater than reported. Further studies are needed to develop additional assessment tools for time toxicity and promote increased efficiency of care for patients with pituitary adenomas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    负面创伤后认知(NPC)与PTSD的症状有关,并且是PTSD认知行为治疗的重要目标,包括认知加工疗法(CPT)。还有待探索的是CPT期间NPC的不同变化轨迹。了解此类变化轨迹可以阐明CPT内常见的NPC变化过程及其与PTSD症状严重程度的关系。我们检查了一组443名退伍军人的NPC变化轨迹,这些退伍军人完成了为期2周的强化CPT计划。我们确定了四个NPC轨迹组,称为起点高端高端,开始高端适度,开始温和低端,开始低端低。大多数组显示NPC在最终降低之前在治疗的中点增加。正如预测的那样,基线PTSD症状严重程度预测变化轨迹组成员。此外,NPC变化轨迹与治疗结束时的PTSD严重程度相关,因此较小的NPC变化组中的个体在治疗结束时PTSD症状较高,反之亦然。临床医生可以利用这些知识来预测特定患者的NPC变化轨迹,并为治疗进展设定预期,包括从治疗开始就使NPC的增加正常化。
    Negative posttraumatic cognitions (NPCs) have been linked to symptoms of PTSD and are an important target of cognitive behavioral treatments for PTSD, including Cognitive Processing Therapy (CPT). Yet to be explored are the different change trajectories of NPCs during CPT. Knowledge of such change trajectories could elucidate common NPC change processes within CPT and their relationship to PTSD symptom severity. We examined NPC change trajectories in a group of 443 veterans who completed a 2-week intensive CPT program. We identified four NPC trajectory groups termed start high end high, start high end moderate, start moderate end low, and start low end low. Most of the groups showed an increase in NPCs at the midpoint of treatment before ultimately decreasing. As predicted, baseline PTSD symptom severity predicted change trajectory group membership. Also, NPC change trajectories were associated with PTSD severity at the end of treatment such that individuals in smaller NPC change groups had higher PTSD symptoms at the end of treatment, and vice versa. Clinicians can use this knowledge to make predictions of a particular client\'s NPC change trajectory and set expectations for what progress in treatment may look like, including normalizing increases in NPCs from the start of treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:预期食品和药物管理局(FDA)批准全后脊柱(TOPS)系统,国际脊柱外科促进会(ISASS)进行了一项研究,以估计关节突关节成形术的相对工作价值单位(RVU).这项研究的目的是在相对价值量表更新委员会(RUC)可以确定适当的值之前,为当前程序术语(CPT)代码0202T建立工作RVU的评估。根据这项调查建立的评估将有助于外科医生从第三方付款人那里建立适当的程序报销。
    方法:创建了一项调查,并发送给52名外科医生,他们在研究器械豁免临床试验期间有植入TOPS系统的经验。调查包括一个病人小插图,CPT代码0202T的描述以及TOPS系统的视频,以及关于插图有效性的确认问题。要求受访者将CPT代码0202T中涉及的工作与8个腰椎手术进行比较。使用可比较程序的工作RVU进行Rasch分析以估计CPT0202T的相对难度。
    结果:41名外科医生对调查做出了回应。在所有的程序中,与后路截骨术相比,CPTCode0202T对等功的反应最多(46%),其次是经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(41%)。回归分析的结果表明CPT0202T的工作RVU为39.47。
    结论:研究发现,使用Rasch分析,CPT代码0202T的估计工作RVU为39.47。作为这种Rasch方法的替代方法,人们可以考虑在程序上对经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术的工作RVU进行人行横道方法,不作为替代代码。
    结论:这些建议不能替代RUC方法,但可作为医生和第三方付款人的参考,以暂时了解收费和支付目的的工作RVU相似性,直到RUC方法为程序提供准确的RVU。
    方法:
    BACKGROUND: In anticipation of Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of the Total Posterior Spine (TOPS) system, the International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery (ISASS) conducted a study to estimate the work relative value units (RVUs) for facet arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to establish a valuation of work RVU for Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) Code 0202T in the interim until the Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) can determine an appropriate value. The valuation established from this survey will assist surgeons to establish appropriate procedure reimbursement from third-party payers.
    METHODS: A survey was created and sent to 52 surgeons who had experience implanting the TOPS system during the investigational device exemption clinical trial. The survey included a patient vignette, a description of CPT Code 0202T along with a video of the TOPS system, and a confirmation question about the illustration\'s effectiveness. Respondents were asked to compare the work involved in CPT Code 0202T to 8 lumbar spine procedures. A Rasch analysis was performed to estimate the relative difficulty of CPT 0202T using the work RVUs of the comparable procedures.
    RESULTS: Forty-one surgeons responded to the survey. Of all the procedures, CPT Code 0202T received the most responses for equal work compared with posterior osteotomy (46%) followed by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (41%). The results of the regression analysis indicate a work RVU for CPT 0202T of 39.47.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study found an estimated work RVU of 39.47 for CPT Code 0202T using Rasch analysis. As an alternative to this Rasch methodology, one may consider a crosswalk methodology to the work RVUs for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion procedurally, not as an alternative code.
    CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations are not a substitute for RUC methodology but serve as a reference for physicians and third-party payers to understand work RVU similarities for charge and payment purposes temporarily until RUC methodology provides accurate RVUs for the procedure.
    METHODS:
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在患有注意力缺陷/多动障碍(ADHD)的成年人中,连续表现测试(CPT)的临床实用性越来越受到质疑。因此,本研究的目的是系统回顾文献,以研究各种市售CPT的临床实用性,包括康纳连续性能测试(CCPT),注意力变量测试(TOVA),Gordon诊断系统(GDS),成人ADHD人群的综合视觉和听觉连续表现测试(IVA)。
    本系统评价遵循先验PRISMA(系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目)指南。文章来自PsycINFO,心术,学术搜索完成,和谷歌学者于2022年4月11日。最终审查中包括了69篇文章。使用美国国立卫生质量评估研究所对观察性队列和横断面研究进行评估。
    大多数文章都显示出偏见的高风险,研究中存在大量异质性。总的来说,审查的CPT似乎具有有限的诊断效用和分类准确性.尽管许多研究显示患有ADHD的成年人和对照组之间的得分不同,研究结果并不一致。ADHD成人的CPT表现特征是混合的,几乎没有一致性,也没有证据表明有明确的表现;然而,当使用治疗或实验结果测量时,CCPT委员会错误似乎最实用,与其他CCPT评分相比。
    总的来说,CPT不应单独用作诊断测试,但当用作综合评估的组成部分时可能是有益的。
    UNASSIGNED: The clinical utility of continuous performance tests (CPTs) among adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) has increasingly been brought under question. Therefore, the objective of this study was to systematically review the literature to investigate the clinical utility of various commercially available CPTs, including the Conner\'s Continuous Performance Test (CCPT), Test of Variables of Attention (TOVA), Gordon Diagnostic System (GDS), and Integrated Visual and Auditory Continuous Performance Test (IVA) in the adult ADHD population.
    UNASSIGNED: This systematic review followed the a priori PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. Articles were gathered from PsycINFO, PsycARTICLES, Academic Search Complete, and Google Scholar on 11 April 2022. Sixty-nine articles were included in the final review. Risk of bias was assessed using the National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Took for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies.
    UNASSIGNED: Most articles demonstrated high risk of bias, and there was substantial heterogeneity across studies. Overall, the reviewed CPTs appeared to have limited diagnostic utility and classification accuracy. Although many studies showed differing scores between adults with ADHD and comparison groups, findings were not consistent. Characteristics of CPT performances among adults with ADHD were mixed, with little consistency and no evidence of a clear profile of performances; however, CCPT commission errors appeared to have the most utility when used a treatment or experimental outcome measure, compared to other CCPT scores.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, CPTs should not be used in isolation as a diagnostic test but may be beneficial when used as a component of a comprehensive assessment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    注意缺陷多动障碍(ADHD)是一种神经发育障碍,影响世界上3%的儿童。
    在这项工作中,我们试图比较患有和未患有ADHD的儿科患者的不同脑激活。
    使用MOXO-CPT测试(使用单和双视觉-听觉干扰物的连续性能测试)进行了具有BOLD对比度的功能共振检查。
    观察到BOLD激活的差异,表明对照儿童经常表现出阴性BOLD激活,而在患有ADHD的儿童中没有发现。对照患者视听关联区的抑制活性大于ADHD患者。对照中额叶和运动区域的抑制与ADHD患者运动区域的过度激活形成对比,这个,以及小脑激活的检测,小脑激活试图调节导致ADHD患者执行失败的不同区域的反应。
    鉴于这些结果,可以说,缺乏抑制ADHD患者的执行功能导致不同大脑系统的混乱。
    UNASSIGNED: Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) is a neurodevelopmental disorder that affects 3% of children in the world.
    UNASSIGNED: In this work, we seek to compare the different brain activations of pediatric patients with and without ADHD.
    UNASSIGNED: A functional resonance examination with BOLD contrast was applied using the MOXO-CPT test (Continuous Performance test with single and double visual-auditory distractors).
    UNASSIGNED: Differences in BOLD activation were observed indicating that control children regularly presented negative BOLD activations that were not found in children with ADHD. Inhibitory activity in audiovisual association zones in control patients was greater than in patients with ADHD. The inhibition in the frontal and motor regions in the controls contrasted with the overactivation of the motor areas in patients with ADHD, this, together with the detection of cerebellar activation which attempted to modulate the responses of the different areas that lead to executive failure in patients with ADHD.
    UNASSIGNED: In view of these results, it can be argued that the lack of inhibition of ADHD patients in their executive functions led to a disorganization of the different brain systems.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)对骨科医生的医生费用越来越严格。本回顾性审查旨在评估成人脊柱畸形(ASD)手术是否适合Medicare报销。
    方法:与≤6、7-12和≥13个椎骨水平的脊柱畸形的后路融合相关的当前程序术语(CPT)代码,以及额外的关节固定术和截骨水平,评估了(1)2002年至2020年的复合年增长率(CAGR),使用CMS医师费用表查找工具中的医师费用数据进行计算;(2)每手术分钟的工作相对价值单位(RVU),使用国家手术质量改进计划的数据。
    结果:从2002年到2020年,ASD手术的所有CPT代码都具有负的通货膨胀调整后的CAGR(范围,-18.49%至-27.66%)。脊柱融合术的平均医师费用下降了26.02%(复合年增长率,-1.66%)在≤6级融合中,27.91%(复合年增长率,-1.80%)在7至12级融合中,和28.25%(复合年增长率,-1.83%)≥13级融合。7-12级(P<0.00001)和≥13级(P<0.00001)的费用比≤6级融合的费用下降更多。7至12级和≥13级(两者P<0.00001)ASD手术的每分钟RVU低于≤6级。
    结论:ASD手术的报销总体下降。≥7级融合的复合年增长率低于≤6级融合的复合年增长率。在2012-2018年,≥7级融合的每分钟RVU低于≤6级融合。可能需要对更高水平的ASD手术的Medicare报销进行重新评估。
    方法:III.
    OBJECTIVE: Physician fees for orthopaedic surgeons by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) are increasingly scrutinized. The present retrospective review aims to assess whether adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgeries are properly valued for Medicare reimbursement.
    METHODS: Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes related to posterior fusion of spinal deformity of ≤ 6, 7-12, and ≥ 13 vertebral levels, as well as additional arthrodesis and osteotomy levels, were assessed for (1) Compound annual growth rate (CAGR) from 2002 to 2020, calculated using physician fee data from the CMS Physician Fee Schedule Look-Up Tool; and (2) work relative value units (RVUs) per operative minute, using data from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.
    RESULTS: From 2002 to 2020, all CPT codes for ASD surgery had negative inflation-adjusted CAGRs (range, - 18.49% to - 27.66%). Mean physician fees for spinal fusion declined by 26.02% (CAGR, - 1.66%) in ≤ 6-level fusion, 27.91% (CAGR, - 1.80%) in 7- to 12-level fusion, and 28.25% (CAGR, - 1.83%) ≥ 13-level fusion. Fees for both 7-12 (P < 0.00001) and ≥ 13 levels (P < 0.00001) declined more than those for fusion of ≤ 6 vertebral levels. RVU per minute was lower for 7- to 12-level and ≥ 13-level (P < 0.00001 for both) ASD surgeries than for ≤ 6-level.
    CONCLUSIONS: Reimbursement for ASD surgery declined overall. CAGR for fusions of ≥ 7 levels were lower than those for fusions of ≤ 6 levels. For 2012-2018, ≥ 7-level fusions had lower RVU per minute than ≤ 6-level fusions. Revaluation of Medicare reimbursement for longer-level ASD surgeries may be warranted.
    METHODS: III.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号