Background. The COVID-19 pandemic demonstrated a need for robust SARS-CoV-2 test evaluation infrastructure to underpin biosecurity and protect the population during a pandemic health emergency.Gap statement. The first generation of rapid antigen tests was less accurate than molecular methods due to their inherent sensitivity and specificity shortfalls, compounded by the consequences of self-testing. This created a need for more accurate point-of-care SARS-CoV-2 detection methods.Aim. Here we present the lessons-learned during the COVID-19 emergency response in Western Australia including the detailed set-up, evaluation and operation of rapid antigen test in a state-run drive-through sample collection service during the COVID-19 pandemic after the strict border shutdown ended.Methods. We report a conformity assessment of a novel, second-generation rapid antigen test (Virulizer) comprising a technician-operated rapid lateral flow immunoassay with fluorescence-based detection.Results. The Virulizer rapid antigen test demonstrated up to 100% sensitivity (95% CI: 61.0-100%), 91.94% specificity (95% CI: 82.5-96.5%) and 92.65% accuracy when compared to a commercial PCR assay method. Wide confidence intervals in our series reflect the limits of small sample size. Nevertheless, the Virulizer assay performance was well-suited to point-of-care screening for SARS-CoV-2 in a drive-through clinic setting.Conclusion. The adaptive evaluation process necessary under changing pandemic conditions enabled assessment of a simple sample collection and point-of-care testing process, and showed how this system could be rapidly deployed for SARS-CoV-2 testing, including to regional and remote settings.

Within the past decade, single domain antibodies (sdAbs) have been recognized as unique affinity binding reagents that can be tailored for performance in a variety of immunoassay formats. Luminex MagPlex color-coded magnetic microspheres provide a high-throughput platform that enables multiplexed immunoassays. We developed a MagPlex bead-based assay for the detection of SARS-CoV-2, using sdAbs against SARS-CoV-2 nucleocapsid (N) protein in which we engineered the sdAb capture reagents to orient them on the beads. The oriented sdAbs provided an increase in sensitivity over randomly oriented sdAbs for samples of N diluted in buffer, which also translated into better detection of SARS-CoV-2 in clinical samples. We assessed the specificity of the assay by examining seasonal coronavirus clinical samples. In summary, we provide a proof-of-concept that a bead-based assay using sdAbs to detect SARS-CoV-2 is feasible and future research combining it with other sdAb-coated beads that can detect other viruses may provide a useful diagnostic tool.

We evaluated the diagnostic performance of newly developed microfluidic microplate-based fluorescent ELISA for anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody detection: the Veri-Q opti COVID-19 IgG and IgM ELISAs (hereafter, \"Opti IgG/M\"; MiCo BioMed, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea), in comparison with conventional ELISAs. A total of 270 serum samples were analyzed, among which 90 samples were serially obtained from 25 COVID-19 patients. Another 180 samples were collected from 180 SARS-CoV-2-negative individuals. As comparative assays, we used SCoV-2 Detect IgG/M ELISA (hereafter, \"InBios IgG/M\"; InBios, Seattle, WA, USA) and Veri-Q COVID-19 IgG/IgM ELISA (hereafter, \"Veri-Q IgG/M\"; MiCo BioMed). Compared with conventional ELISAs, the Opti IgG yielded 97.1-100.0% positive percent agreement, 95.2-98.0% negative percent agreement, 96.3-97.8% total percent agreement, and kappa values of 0.90-0.94. Between the Opti IgM and the InBios IgM, the values were 93.7%, 96.6%, 95.9%, and 0.89, respectively. For the Opti IgG, sensitivities for the samples collected from 0-7, 8-14, 15-21, and ≥ 22 days after symptom onset were 40.0, 58.3, 94.1, and 100.0%, respectively. The values for the Opti IgM were 30.0, 54.2, 88.2, and 80%, respectively. The diagnostic specificities of the Opti IgG and IgM were 99.4 and 97.2%, respectively. The microfluidic microplate-based fluorescent ELISAs showed comparable diagnostic performance to conventional ELISAs for detecting anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. With the combination of high throughput, a simplified workflow, and the ability to analyze reduced volumes, this new technology has great potential for improving SARS-CoV-2 serologic testing.

Antibody pairs-based immunoassay platforms served as essential and effective tools in the field of pathogen detection. However, the cumbersome preparation and limited detection sensitivity of antibody pairs challenge in establishment of a highly sensitive detection platform. In this study, using COVID-19 testing as a case, we utilized readily accessible nanobodies as detection antibodies and further proposed an accurate design concept with a more scientific and efficient screening strategy to obtain ultrasensitive antibody pairs. We employed nanobodies capable of binding different antigenic epitopes of the nucleocapsid (NP) or receptor-binding domain (RBD) antigens sandwich as substitutes for monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) sandwich in fast detection formats and utilized time-resolved fluorescence (TRF) microspheres as the signal probe. Consequently, we developed a multi-epitope nanobody sandwich-based fluorescence lateral flow immunoassay (FLFA) strip. Our results suggest that the NP antigen had a detection limit of 12.01pg/mL, while the RBD antigen had a limit of 6.51 pg/mL using our FLFA strip. Based on double mAb sandwiches, the values presented herein demonstrated 4 to 32-fold enhancements in sensitivity, and 32 to 256-fold enhancements compared to commercially available antigen lateral flow assay kits. Furthermore, we demonstrated the excellent characteristics of the proposed test strip, including its specificity, stability, accuracy, and repeatability, which underscores its the prospective utility. Indeed, these findings indicate that our established screening strategy along with the multi-epitope nanobody sandwich mode provides an optimized strategy in the field of pathogen detection.

On the 11th of March 2020, the world faced a new global pandemic, COVID-19 which is a disease caused by the novel coronavirus, it had multiple devastating outcomes on multiple sectors along with significant rates of mortality. These challenges encouraged the development of multiple testing methods, as well as anti-viral medications such as Molnupiravir, as well as evaluating the efficacy of available medications against it, like; Azithromycin, Ritonavir and Hydroxychloroquine. Vaccination against COVID-19 forged into a significant challenge, few months ensuing the first case of SARS-CoV-2, which was diagnosed in December 2019, in Wuhan-China, thus, multiple vaccines were approved for use around the world to combat this pandemic. Our study includes a sample of 556 oncology patients at Augusta Victoria Hospital in Jerusalem, all patients were tested using Panbio rapid antigen test and Allplex PCR Assay. The main objective was to study the sensitivity and specificity of Rapid antigen test, which contributes to a faster isolation call and management of infected patients, thus decreasing the risk on spread to other patients and health care. Patients were categorized based on two factors: Ct range and age group and studying their possible effect on false-negative results. Patients with Ct value less than 20, had the highest detection rate which is consistent with other studies in the literature. The sensitivity and specificity of Panbio Rapid Antigen testing were of 69.9% and 100%, respectively. A correlation between age group and false negative results could not be made, but a correlation between Ct value and false negative result was noticed, Ct value was directly related to false negative results. P-value of 0.007 indicated that results were statistically significant where PCR test is considered more sensitive compared to rapid antigen test.

Commercially available assays for measuring severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) anti-spike (S) or anti-nucleocapsid (N) antibodies differ in units, making results comparisons challenging. This study aimed to develop conversion equations between five quantitative anti-S antibody tests and to assess the agreement over time between three qualitative anti-N antibody tests. Blood samples from 24 216 vaccinated healthcare workers in Hiroshima Prefecture, Japan, were analyzed for anti-S antibodies using five quantitative tests (Abbott, Fujirebio, Ortho, Sysmex, Roche) and for anti-N antibodies using three qualitative tests (Abbott, Sysmex, Roche). Geometric mean regression was performed to establish equations for converting measured values between the five quantitative tests. Fleiss κ statistic was used to assess the agreement between the three qualitative tests. A strong correlation (Pearson\'s coefficient r > 0.9) was found for each pair of the five quantitative tests measuring anti-S antibodies, enabling the development of equations to convert values between each pair. Using these equations, which are based on the original output unit of each test, values obtained from one test can be transformed to be equivalent to the corresponding values in another test. For the three tests for anti-N antibodies, the agreement was substantial in the total sample (Fleiss\' κ, 0.74) and moderate among those with self-reported past coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection (Fleiss\' κ, 0.39). The agreement decreased with time after infection. Reduced agreement between anti-N antibodies tests over time suggests caution in comparing seroepidemiological studies of COVID-19 exposure based on anti-N antibodies measurement. The findings could help improve antibody measurement systems and inform public health decision-makers.

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic underscored the need for rapid and accurate diagnostic tools. In August 2020, the Abbott BinaxNOW COVID-19 Antigen Card test became available as a timely and affordable alternative for SARS-CoV-2 molecular testing, but its performance may vary due to factors including timing and symptomatology. This study evaluates BinaxNOW diagnostic performance in diverse epidemiological contexts.
METHODS: Using RT-PCR as reference, we assessed performance of the BinaxNOW COVID-19 test for SARS-CoV-2 detection in anterior nasal swabs from participants of two studies in Puerto Rico from December 2020 to May 2023. Test performance was assessed by days post symptom onset, collection strategy, vaccination status, symptomatology, repeated testing, and RT-PCR cycle threshold (Ct) values.
RESULTS: BinaxNOW demonstrated an overall sensitivity of 84.1% and specificity of 98.8%. Sensitivity peaked within 1-6 days after symptom onset (93.2%) and was higher for symptomatic (86.3%) than asymptomatic (67.3%) participants. Sensitivity declined over the course of infection, dropping from 96.3% in the initial test to 48.4% in testing performed 7-14 days later. BinaxNOW showed 99.5% sensitivity in participants with low Ct values (≤ 25) but lower sensitivity (18.2%) for participants with higher Cts (36-40).
CONCLUSIONS: BinaxNOW demonstrated high sensitivity and specificity, particularly in early-stage infections and symptomatic participants. In situations where test sensitivity is crucial for clinical decision-making, nucleic acid amplification tests are preferred. These findings highlight the importance of considering clinical and epidemiological context when interpreting test results and emphasize the need for ongoing research to adapt testing strategies to emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.

COVID-19 disproportionately affected minorities, while research barriers to engage underserved communities persist. Serological studies reveal infection and vaccination histories within these communities, however lack of consensus on downstream evaluation methods impede meta-analyses and dampen the broader public health impact. To reveal the impact of COVID-19 and vaccine uptake among diverse communities and to develop rigorous serological downstream evaluation methods, we engaged racial and ethnic minorities in Massachusetts in a cross-sectional study (April-July 2022), screened blood and saliva for SARS-CoV-2 and human endemic coronavirus (hCoV) antibodies by bead-based multiplex assay and point-of-care (POC) test and developed across-plate normalization and classification boundary methods for optimal qualitative serological assessments. Among 290 participants, 91.4% reported receiving at least one dose of a COVID-19 vaccine, while 41.7% reported past SARS-CoV-2 infections, which was confirmed by POC- and multiplex-based saliva and blood IgG seroprevalences. We found significant differences in antigen-specific IgA and IgG antibody outcomes and indication of cross-reactivity with hCoV OC43. Finally, 26.5% of participants reported lingering COVID-19 symptoms, mostly middle-aged Latinas. Hence, prolonged COVID-19 symptoms were common among our underserved population and require public health attention, despite high COVID-19 vaccine uptake. Saliva served as a less-invasive sample-type for IgG-based serosurveys and hCoV cross-reactivity needed to be evaluated for reliable SARS-CoV-2 serosurvey results. The use of the developed rigorous downstream qualitative serological assessment methods will help standardize serosurvey outcomes and meta-analyses for future serosurveys beyond SARS-CoV-2.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and antigen test (AgT) are frequently used in the diagnosis of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Routine PCR tests that detect the virus genome cannot determine whether the virus is infectious or not. However, detection of subgenomic RNA (sgRNA) produced during the replication period may indicate active viral infection. Active virus detection can offer various health and economic benefits from isolation time to treatment. Antigen tests are also considered as indicators of infectiousness since they can detect viruses above a certain load amount. The aim of this study was to use two different subgenomic RNAs and antigen test instead of genomic RNA to examine the relationship with each other and the clinic in terms of infectiousness. Evaluating the antigen test together with subgenomic RNA as an indicator of infectiousness may show the importance of this test. SARS-CoV-2 PCR positive 109 naso/oropharyngeal swab samples stored at -80 °C were included in the study. In order to confirm the PCR positivity of these samples, E gene PCR was performed and AgT, and E and N sgRNA quantitative real-time reverse transcription-PCR (RT-qPCR) detection was performed. Of the 109 SARSCoV-2 PCR positive samples, 83 (76.14%) had antigen test positivity, 88 (80.73%) had E gene sgRNA, 96 (88.07%) had N gene sgRNA and 97 (89%) had at least one sgRNA positivity.The antigen test was found positive in 77.3% of the samples in which at least one sgRNA was detected and in 66.7% of the negative samples and this difference was not statistically significant (p= 0.475). The difference between E sgRNA and AgT positivity was significant (p= 0.023). N sgRNA was positive in 98.9% of E sgRNA positive samples and 42.9% of the negative samples and this difference was statistically significant (p= 0.0001). The AgT positivity rate was found to be 98.15% (53/54) for cycle threshold (Ct) value ≤ 25, 57.14% (12/21) for Ct 25-30, and 52.94% (18/34) for Ct ≥ 30. The difference in antigen test positivity between E gRNA Ct value ≤ 25 and > 25, ≤ 29 and > 29, < 30 and ≥ 30 was statistically significant (p= 0.0001). Antigen test positivity appears to be associated with viral load and infectivity, as expected. In our study, it has been shown that sgRNAs and AgT which are indicators of infectiousness can be detected at least 10 days after the symptom period. Using these two tests together could detect infective individuals with higher accuracy and shorten the duration of hospital stay and isolation.

OBJECTIVE: We investigated if performing two lateral flow device (LFD) tests, LFD2 immediately after LFD1, could improve diagnostic sensitivity or specificity for detecting severe acute respiratory syndrome-related coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) antigen.
METHODS: Individuals aged ≥16 years attending UK community testing sites (February-May 2021) performed two successive LFD tests and provided a nose-and-throat sample for a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test. Using the PCR result as the reference diagnosis, we assessed whether improvements could be achieved in sensitivity (by counting a positive result in either LFD as a positive overall test result) or specificity (by using LFD2 as confirmatory test).
RESULTS: Overall, 2231 participants were included with 159 (7 %) having a positive PCR test. Of 2223 participants who completed both LFD tests, LFD results were highly concordant both with each other and with PCR tests (>97 %). The proportion of discord LFD results decreased significantly over the study period. Combined LFD usage achieved a sensitivity of 68.6 %, versus 67.1 % for either LFD individually. The specificity increased from 99.5 % to 99.8 % when using LFD2 as confirmatory test. Observed increases in sensitivity and specificity were not statistically significant. Void results were recorded for 31 (1.4 %) LFD1s, 19 (0.9 %) LFD2s and 6 (0.3 %) combined LFD tests.
CONCLUSIONS: LFD tests were highly reproducible even when they were performed by untrained users following only written instructions and without supervision. While performing two LFD tests of the same type in quick succession marginally increased sensitivity or specificity, statistically significant improvements were not detected in our study.