CIT, cold ischemic time

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:本研究旨在评估体外循环胸腹常温局部灌注对心脏死亡器官捐献者移植前捐献代谢环境的影响。
    UNASSIGNED:对心脏死亡后的当地捐赠供者的适用性和参与意愿进行评估。在手术室中进行维持生命疗法的撤回。在宣布循环性死亡和5分钟观察期后,心脏团队进行了正中胸骨切开术,主动脉弓血管结扎,并在37°C下通过中心体外循环开始胸腹常温局部灌注。注入三个含有50mEq碳酸氢钠和0.5g碳酸钙的氯化钠零平衡超滤袋。在输注每个零平衡超滤袋后,每15分钟获得动脉血气测量值,并根据需要输血以维持血红蛋白大于8mg/dL。体外循环断奶,同时对供体心脏进行血流动力学和经食道超声心动图评估。剩余的采购,包括腹部器官,以类似于脑死亡后标准捐赠的受控方式进行捐赠。
    UNASSIGNED:在2020年1月至2022年5月之间,在我们机构使用胸腹常温区域灌注方案进行了18例心脏死亡移植后捐赠。供体年龄中位数为42.5岁(范围,20-51年),男性占88.9%(16/18)。平均总供体体外循环时间为88.8±51.8分钟。在体外循环开始时,供体乳酸平均为9.4±1.5mmol/L,最终乳酸平均为5.3±2.7mmol/L(P<0.0001)。平均起始钾为6.5±1.8mmol/L,平均终止钾为4.2±0.4mmol/L(P<.0001)。平均起始血红蛋白为6.8±0.7g/dL,平均终末血红蛋白为8.2±1.3g/dL(P<.001)。平均而言,心脏死亡后的献血者接受了2.3±1.5单位包装红细胞的输血.在18位接受了常温区域灌注的捐献者中,所有的心脏都被认为适合恢复并成功移植,100%的收益率。其他成功回收和移植的器官包括肾脏(产率为80.6%),肝脏(66.7%的收益率),和双侧肺(27.8%的产率)。
    UNASSIGNED:使用体外循环进行胸腹常温区域灌注是提高心脏死亡捐献者捐献器官质量的新兴选择。对心脏死亡供者的术中精心管理,特别注重改善其代谢环境,可能会改善移植受者的移植物功能。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of cardiopulmonary bypass for thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion on the metabolic milieu of donation after cardiac death organ donors before transplantation.
    UNASSIGNED: Local donation after cardiac death donor offers are assessed for suitability and willingness to participate. Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy is performed in the operating room. After declaration of circulatory death and a 5-minute observation period, the cardiac team performs a median sternotomy, ligation of the aortic arch vessels, and initiation of thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion via central cardiopulmonary bypass at 37 °C. Three sodium chloride zero balance ultrafiltration bags containing 50 mEq sodium bicarbonate and 0.5 g calcium carbonate are infused. Arterial blood gas measurements are obtained every 15 minutes after every zero balance ultrafiltration bag is infused, and blood is transfused as needed to maintain hemoglobin greater than 8 mg/dL. Cardiopulmonary bypass is weaned with concurrent hemodynamic and transesophageal echocardiogram evaluation of the donor heart. The remainder of the procurement, including the abdominal organs, proceeds in a similar controlled fashion as is performed for a standard donation after brain death donor.
    UNASSIGNED: Between January 2020 and May 2022, 18 donation after cardiac death transplants using the thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion protocol were performed at our institution. The median donor age was 42.5 years (range, 20-51 years), and 88.9% (16/18) were male. The mean total donor cardiopulmonary bypass time was 88.8 ± 51.8 minutes. At the beginning of cardiopulmonary bypass, the average donor lactate was 9.4 ± 1.5 mmol/L compared with an average final lactate of 5.3 ± 2.7 mmol/L (P<.0001). The average beginning potassium was 6.5 ± 1.8 mmol/L compared with an average end potassium of 4.2 ± 0.4 mmol/L (P<.0001) . The average beginning hemoglobin was 6.8 ± 0.7 g/dL, and the average end hemoglobin was 8.2 ± 1.3 g/dL (P<.001) . On average, donation after cardiac death donors received transfusions of 2.3 ± 1.5 units of packed red blood cells. Of the 18 donors who underwent normothermic regional perfusion, all hearts were deemed suitable for recovery and successfully transplanted, a yield of 100%. Other organs successfully recovered and transplanted include kidneys (80.6% yield), livers (66.7% yield), and bilateral lungs (27.8% yield).
    UNASSIGNED: The use of cardiopulmonary bypass for thoraco-abdominal normothermic regional perfusion is a burgeoning option for improving the quality of organs from donation after cardiac death donors. Meticulous intraoperative management of donation after cardiac death donors with a specific focus on improving their metabolic milieu may lead to improved graft function in transplant recipients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肝移植(LT)的利用受到合适器官的可用性的限制。本研究旨在评估供体风险指数(DRI)和其他供体特征对纤维化进展的影响。移植,和丙型肝炎病毒(HCV)感染的LT受者的患者生存率。
    方法:纳入至少2例LT方案后肝活检标本的HCV感染LT受者。使用Cox比例风险回归分析计算双变量分析的风险比。
    结果:在312个收件人中,26.6%的患者在58.5个月的中位随访时间内死亡(95%CI:46.5-67.3)。14例患者接受了再次移植。平均移植失败时间为84.3个月,中位随访时间:59个月,95%CI(48.2,68.3)。DRI>1.5与患者和移植物存活显著相关(P=0.04)。在104例接受组织学分析的个体中,67.3%进展到≥F2。在多变量分析中,纤维化进展的重要供体特异性预测因子为:供体年龄>50岁,DRI>1.7.
    结论:(1)HCV感染LT受体的纤维化进展与供体特征密切相关,特别是供体年龄和DRI。(2)DRI,对捐赠者质量的客观衡量,似乎与组织学进展率和总体患者/移植物存活率均相关。
    BACKGROUND: The utilization of liver transplantation (LT) is limited by the availability of suitable organs. This study aimed to assess the impact of the donor risk index (DRI) and other donor characteristics on fibrosis progression, graft, and patient survival in hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected LT recipients.
    METHODS: HCV-infected LT recipients who had at least 2 post-LT protocol liver biopsy specimens available were included. Hazard ratio for bivariate analysis was computed using Cox proportional hazard regression analysis.
    RESULTS: Of 312 recipients, 26.6% died over a median follow-up of 58.5 months (95% CI: 46.5-67.3). Fourteen patients underwent re-transplantation. Mean time to graft failure was 84.3 months, median follow-up: 59 months, 95% CI (48.2, 68.3). DRI >1.5 was significantly associated with patient and graft survival (P = 0.04). Of the subset of 104 individuals who underwent histological analysis, 67.3% progressed to ≥F2. On multivariate analysis, significant donor-specific predictors of fibrosis progression were: donor age >50 years and DRI >1.7.
    CONCLUSIONS: (1) Fibrosis progression in HCV-infected LT recipients is strongly associated with donor characteristics, specifically donor age and DRI. (2) DRI, an objective measure of donor quality, appears to correlate both with rate of histological progression and overall patient/graft survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Deceased donor (DDLT) and living donor (LDLT) liver transplant (LT) is in vogue in several centers in India. Most centers are resorting to LDLT as a preferred surgery due to shortage of deceased donor liver. The risk of infection and its effect on survival in both groups of recipients from the Indian subcontinent are not known. The study was conducted to compare the bacterial infection rates among LDLT and DDLT recipients and their impact on survival at a tertiary referral center.
    METHODS: Retrospective data on 67 LT recipients were reviewed. Data on pre-, per-, and postoperative bacterial infection rates and the common isolates were obtained.
    RESULTS: Thirty-five patients had LDLT and 32 had DDLT. The prevalence of pre-operative bacterial infection and the isolates was similar in both groups. The perioperative bacterial infection rates were significantly higher in DDLT recipients (P < 0.01) (relative risk: 1.44 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.9). In both LDLT and DDLT, the common source was urinary tract followed by bloodstream infection. The common bacterial isolates in either transplant were Klebsiella followed by Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas spp. and nonfermenting gram-negative bacteria. Six patients (four LDLT; two DDLT) were treated for tuberculosis. Among the risk factors, cold ischemic time, and duration of stay in the intensive care unit was significantly higher for DDLT (p < 0.01). The death rates were not significantly different in the two groups. However, the odds for death were significantly high at 26.8 (p < 0.05) for postoperative bacterial infection and 1.8 (p < 0.001) for past alcohol.
    CONCLUSIONS: Liver transplant recipients are at high-risk for bacterial infection irrespective of type of transplant, more so in DDLT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号