The landscape of cardiac pacemaker technology has undergone significant evolution over the last two decades, transitioning from simple single-chamber devices to sophisticated multi-chamber rate-responsive systems and cardioverter defibrillators. This progression has introduced a complex array of complications inherent to device implantation and operation, encompassing both mechanical and clinical challenges. These complications notably include lead dislodgment, device migration, venous thrombosis, and hemothorax, which not only affect patient outcomes but also impose substantial economic burdens. This review meticulously analyzes these complications, elucidating their mechanisms, clinical implications, and the economic consequences associated with their management. It also outlines current and emerging strategies aimed at mitigating these complications, emphasizing the need for continual updates in clinical practices and protocols. Through this discourse, the review seeks to equip clinicians with a comprehensive understanding of these complications, thereby enhancing the safety and efficacy of cardiac pacing interventions.

A large proportion of patients referred for transcatheter tricuspid valve intervention (TTVI) will have the presence of a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED). In such patients, surgical correction of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality. Transvenous lead extraction (TLE) could potentially ameliorate CIED-induced TR; however, it carries inherent risks and frequently does not result in TR improvement. As multiple TTVI devices are in trial to gain regulatory approval, understanding which therapy is most appropriate among patients with a CIED is essential. This review centers on the nonsurgical treatment, including TLE and transcatheter tricuspid valve repair and replacement options, aimed at enhancing outcomes in patients with TR who also have concurrent CIEDs.

OBJECTIVE: Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device (CIED) infections pose significant mortality and morbidity despite optimal treatment. This survey aimed to understand whether and how the risk of CIED infection is assessed and mitigated in clinical practice in Europe, and to detect gaps with respect to EHRA recommendations.
METHODS: An Expert Group of 8 European cardiologists with specific expertise across CIED therapy designed and distributed electronically a survey to a number of European Cardiologists.
RESULTS: 302 physicians from 18 European countries responded to the survey. 288/302 (95%) physicians agreed that CIED-related infections represent a burden on healthcare resources and are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. 285/302 respondents (94%) primarily assess the risk of CIED infections by only evaluating the patient\'s clinical profile (137/302, 46%) or with the support of a risk score (148/302, 49%). Intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis is used by 282/302 (93%), followed by the implantation of the lowest number of leads possible (182/302, 60%), and by the use of an antibacterial envelope (173/302, 57%). 230/302 respondents (76%) declared that there is need for clear and concise guidelines and more sensitive risk-scores for CIED infection, to maximize the chances of preventative strategies.
CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrates a high level of awareness about the multifaceted issue of CIED infection, however, it also highlights an incomplete penetration of scoring systems for risk stratification owing to their perceived limitations, and detects a strong commitment to increase the effectiveness of preventative strategies.

OBJECTIVE: Early identification of worsening HF enables timely adjustments to prevent hospitalization. Recent studies show the HeartLogic™ algorithm detects congestion and reduces HF events. However, it is unclear which patients benefit most. Therefore, this study aims to identify and characterize HF patients who benefit most from CIED-based remote monitoring with HeartLogic™.
METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, patients with a CIED and HeartLogic™ algorithm under structured follow-up were included. Patients were classified as having \"substantial benefit\" or \"no benefit\" from monitoring.
RESULTS: In total, 242 patients were included (male n = 190, 79%, median age 61 years [IQR 61-77]). Median follow-up was 1.2 years [IQR 1.1-2.7]. Among 378 alerts, 266 were true positive (70%) and 112 false positive (30%). Of the 242 patients, 69 (29%) were classified as having \"substantial benefit\", while 173 (71%) had \"no benefit\" from HeartLogic™ monitoring. Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that patients with \"substantial benefit\" had higher NYHA functional class (OR 2.64, P = 0.004), higher NT-ProBNP (OR 1.02, P = 0.003), higher serum creatinine (OR 1.10, P < 0.001), lower LVEF (OR 1.19, P = 0.004), more severe mitral regurgitation (OR 2.16, P = 0.006), higher right ventricular end diastolic volume (OR 1.05, P = 0.040), higher pulmonary artery pressures (OR 1.19, P = 0.003), and were more likely to use loop diuretics (OR 2.79, P = 0.001). Among patients with \"substantial benefit,\" the positive predictive value (PPV) of HeartLogic™ to detect congestion was 92%.
CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of CIED-based HeartLogic™ driven HF care demonstrated pronounced efficacy, predominantly in patients exhibiting characteristics of HF at a more advanced disease stage.

Endocarditis, a serious infectious disease, remains a diagnostic challenge in contemporary clinical practice. The advent of advanced imaging modalities has contributed significantly to the improved understanding and management of this complex disease. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging has shown remarkable potential in improving the diagnostic accuracy of endocarditis. In the update of the Modified Duke Criteria, in 2023, The International Society for Cardiovascular Infectious Diseases (ISCVID) Working Group recognized specific 18F-FDG PET/CT findings as a major diagnostic criterion, particularly in patient with prosthetic valve endocarditis. The ability of PET to visualize metabolic activity allows for the identification of infective foci and could differentiate between infective and non-infective processes. This review examines the clinical utility of PET in differentiating infective endocarditis from other cardiovascular pathologies, highlighting its sensitivity and specificity in detecting native and prosthetic valve infections, including patients with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), cardiac implantable devices (CIEDs), and left ventricular assistance devices (LVAD). Also, practical aspects and indications are illustrated to optimize the quality of imaging and reduce potential false positive results. In conclusion, the current use of PET in endocarditis has become a valuable diagnostic tool; as technological advances continue, PET will play an increasingly important role in the multidisciplinary approach to the management of endocarditis.

Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) offer the benefit of remote monitoring and decision making and find particular applications in special populations such as the elderly. Less transportation, reduced costs, prompt diagnosis, a sense of security, and continuous real-time monitoring are the main advantages. On the other hand, less physician-patient interactions and the technology barrier in the elderly pose specific problems in remote monitoring. CIEDs nowadays are abundant and are mostly represented by rhythm control/monitoring devices, whereas hemodynamic remote monitoring devices are gaining popularity and are evolving and becoming refined. Future directions include the involvement of artificial intelligence, yet disparities of availability, lack of follow-up data, and insufficient patient education are still areas to be improved. This review aims to describe the role of CIED in the very elderly and highlight the merits and possible drawbacks.

UNASSIGNED: When cardiac implantable electronic device infection occurs, standard therapy is usually total system extraction. Transvenous lead extraction is preferable to open heart surgical extraction, unless contraindicated because of the presence of very large vegetations on the intravenous leads according to the European Society of Cardiology guidelines. Extraction of transvenous leads with vegetations risks distal embolism resulting in obstruction and/or infection in the pulmonary arteries. Catheter aspiration of vegetations or thrombi has been performed prior to transvenous lead extraction using a partial veno-venous extracorporeal bypass circuit. We report the use of a single-access aspiration system using the Inari FlowTriever 24 French system to debulk a defibrillator lead before percutaneous extraction.
UNASSIGNED: A 79-year-old male presented with fever 18 years after his first implantable cardioverter defibrillator implant and 9 years after his most recent pulse generator change. Two large vegetations were identified on his transvenous defibrillator lead on the atrial aspect, near the tricuspid annulus, which were aspirated using the Inari Medical 24Fr FlowTriever aspiration catheter. We describe anatomical considerations during the approach and a technique to localize the vegetations based on a combination of fluoroscopy and transoesophageal echocardiogram guidance.
UNASSIGNED: This case demonstrates the safe and effective use of the Inari Medical 24Fr FlowTriever aspiration catheter in debulking a defibrillator lead before transvenous lead extraction. This method uses a single venous puncture and is not dependent on extracorporeal bypass. Apart from reducing complexity, this technique may be advantageous in patients where anticoagulation needs to be minimised.

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on leadless pacemaker (LPM) outcomes according to different stages of chronic kidney disease (CKD).
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate differences in the safety and efficacy of LPMs among patients stratified per different stages of renal function.
METHODS: Consecutive patients enrolled in the multicenter international i-LEAPER registry (International LEAdless PacemakEr Registry) were analyzed. Patients were divided into 3 groups according to CKD stage. The primary end point was the comparison of LPM-related major complication rate at implantation and during follow-up. Differences in electrical performance were deemed secondary outcomes.
RESULTS: Of the 1748 patients enrolled, 33% were in CKD stage G3a/G3b and 9.4% were in CKD stage G4/G5. Patients with CKD presented cardiovascular comorbidities more frequently. During a median follow-up of 39 months (interquartile range [IQR] 18-59 months), major complication rate did not differ between groups (normal kidney function [NKF] group 1.8% vs CKD stage G3a/G3b group 2.9% vs CKD stage G4/G5 group 2.4%; P = .418). All-cause mortality resulted higher in the CKD stage G4/G5 group than in the NKF group (19.5% vs 9.8%; adjusted hazard ratio 1.9; 95% confidence interval 1.25-2.89; P = .003). LPM electrical performance was comparable between groups, except for patients with CKD who showed a slightly higher pacing threshold during 1-month follow-up (NKF group 0.50 V [IQR 0.35-0.70 V] vs G3a/G3b group 0.56 V [IQR 0.38-0.81 V] vs G4/G5 group 0.51 V [0.38-0.84 V] @ 0.24 ms; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: In a real-world setting, patients with advanced CKD who underwent LPM implantation were underrepresented. Although all-cause mortality was higher in end-stage CKD, periprocedural complications and LPM performance were overall comparable between NKF and different stages of CKD, except for higher values of pacing threshold in patients with CKD up to first-month follow-up.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。