CHEMOTHERAPY

化疗
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:奥氮平在亚洲国家以2.5或5mg的剂量被处方用于预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐。我们比较了奥氮平2.5mg和5mg在肺癌患者中预防化疗引起的恶心和呕吐的有效性。
    方法:使用日本国家住院数据库,我们确定了在2016年1月至2021年3月期间肺癌高致吐性化疗期间接受奥氮平剂量2.5mg或5mg的患者.我们进行了1:1的倾向得分匹配分析,并调整了各种因素,包括那些影响奥氮平代谢的.结果是额外服用止吐药(化疗开始后2-5天内),住院时间,和总住院费用。
    结果:奥氮平2.5和5.0mg分别用于2905和4287例患者,分别。倾向评分匹配分析表明,奥氮平2.5mg给药与更高比例的额外止吐药物给药显著相关(36%vs.31%,p<0.001)比奥氮平5mg。两组的平均住院时间均为8天。两种剂量奥氮平的总住院费用没有显着差异(5061vs.5160美元,p=0.07)。工具变量分析证明了一致的结果。
    结论:肺癌化疗期间预防性使用奥氮平2.5mg与额外使用止吐药的比率高于奥氮平5mg。
    BACKGROUND: Olanzapine is prescribed as prophylaxis for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting at a dose of 2.5 or 5 mg in Asian countries. We compared the effectiveness of olanzapine 2.5 mg and 5 mg in preventing chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting among patients receiving high-emetogenic chemotherapy for lung cancer.
    METHODS: Using a Japanese national inpatient database, we identified patients who received olanzapine doses of 2.5 or 5 mg during high-emetogenic chemotherapy for lung cancer between January 2016 and March 2021. We conducted a 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis with adjustment for various factors, including those affecting olanzapine metabolism. The outcomes were additional antiemetic drug administration (within 2-5 days after chemotherapy initiation), length of hospital stay, and total hospitalization costs.
    RESULTS: Olanzapine 2.5 and 5.0 mg were used in 2905 and 4287 patients, respectively. The propensity score-matched analysis showed that olanzapine 2.5 mg administration was significantly associated with a higher proportion of additional antiemetic drug administration (36% vs. 31%, p < 0.001) than olanzapine 5 mg. The median length of hospital stay was 8 days in both groups. Total hospitalization cost did not differ significantly between the two doses of olanzapine (5061 vs. 5160 USD, p = 0.07). The instrumental variable analysis demonstrated compatible results.
    CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic use of olanzapine 2.5 mg during chemotherapy for lung cancer was associated with a higher rate of additional antiemetic drugs than olanzapine 5 mg.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:脑膜旁横纹肌肉瘤(PM-RMS)是一种罕见且侵袭性的软组织恶性肿瘤,主要发生在头颈部。RMS的标准治疗方法包括多模式治疗方案,其中包括手术,化疗,和放射治疗。然而,在头颈部区域RMS的年轻患者中常规使用放疗和化疗可导致对牙齿发育的不利影响,在规划牙科干预方面构成了挑战。
    方法:本病例报告概述了一名13岁儿童的牙齿和面部发育后果,他们在7岁时接受了化学放射治疗介入治疗,以治疗PM-RMS。治疗后,这个孩子表现出明显的牙齿并发症,包括根部生长停滞和张口受限。
    结论:这个案例突出了肿瘤学家之间跨学科合作的必要性,牙医,和其他医疗保健专业人员,以减轻对接受横纹肌肉瘤化疗放疗的患者的牙齿健康和整体生活质量的不利影响。
    BACKGROUND: Parameningeal rhabdomyosarcoma (PM-RMS) is a rare and aggressive soft tissue malignancy that primarily occurs in the head and neck region. The standard treatment approach for RMS involves a multimodal therapy regimen, which includes surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. However, the routine use of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in young patients with RMS in the head and neck region can lead to adverse effects on dental development and thereby, pose a challenge in planning dental intervention.
    METHODS: This case report outlines the dental and facial developmental consequences in a 13-year-old child, who received chemo-radiotherapeutic intervention at the age of 7 years for the management of PM-RMS. Following treatment, the child exhibited significant dental complications, including arrested root growth and restricted mouth opening.
    CONCLUSIONS: This case highlights the necessity for interdisciplinary collaboration between oncologists, dentists, and other healthcare professionals to mitigate the adverse effects on dental health and overall quality of life in patients undergoing chemo-radiotherapy for rhabdomyosarcoma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:基于免疫疗法的方案(IMT)与细胞毒性化疗(CHT)相比,可改善不可切除或转移性食管鳞状细胞癌(mESCC)患者的总生存期(OS),但预后变量的作用尚不清楚.该研究旨在探讨IMT或CHT后预后因素与生存的相互作用。
    方法:对mESCC患者的IMT和CHT方案进行了系统评价。前期IMT+CHTvs.的荟萃分析CHT试验评估了研究之间的总体效应大小和异质性。鉴于化疗和免疫治疗在存活曲线上的预期差异,为了更好地探索任何预后变量对OS的影响,在进展之前和之后,治疗组被评估为独立的队列,提取10个基线变量,并通过线性回归进行评估。
    结果:确定了14项试验。七项研究比较了前期CHT+IMT与CHT记录CHT+IMT的较长操作系统(HR0.69,CI0.65-0.72),没有异质性(Q=1.43,p值=0.968)或最代表性的亚组差异。从14项试验中选择29个研究队列。中间OS和PPS,但不是PFS,与CHT相比,IMT后显著增加。CHT后的基线变量分析证明,高龄患者具有良好的预后效果(β=0.768,p值=0.016),0-1个转移部位(β=0.943,p值=0.005),和以前没有放射治疗(β=-0.939,p值=0.006),但均不影响IMT后的预后。
    结论:前期IMT的引入延长了mESCC患者的OS,主要改善年轻患者的预后,有多个转移部位,以前没有放疗。
    OBJECTIVE: Immunotherapy-based regimens (IMT) versus cytotoxic chemotherapy (CHT) improved overall survival (OS) of patients with unresectable or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (mESCC), but the role of prognostic variables is unclear. The study aims to explore the interaction of prognostic factors with survival after IMT or CHT.
    METHODS: A systematic review was performed to select trials comparing IMT and CHT regimens in mESCC patients. A meta-analysis of upfront IMT + CHT vs. CHT trials evaluated the overall effect size and heterogeneity between studies. In view of the expected differences between chemotherapy and immunotherapy on the survival curve, to better explore the effect of any prognostic variables on OS, before and after progression, the treatment arms were evaluated as independent cohorts, and ten baseline variables were extracted and assessed by linear regression.
    RESULTS: Fourteen trials were identified. Seven studies compared upfront CHT + IMT vs. CHT documenting longer OS for CHT + IMT (HR 0.69, CI 0.65-0.72), without heterogeneity (Q = 1.43, p value = 0.968) or differences in the most represented subgroups. Twenty-nine study cohorts were selected from the 14 trials. Median OS and PPS, but not PFS, were significantly increased after IMT compared with CHT. The analysis of baseline variables after CHT documented a favorable prognostic effect for advanced age (β = 0.768, p value = 0.016), involvement of 0-1 metastasis sites (β = 0.943, p value = 0.005), and absence of previous radiation therapy (β =  - 0.939, p value = 0.006), while none of them influenced prognosis after IMT.
    CONCLUSIONS: The introduction of upfront IMT prolonged mESCC patients OS, mostly improving the outcomes of young patients, with multiple metastasis sites and without previous radiotherapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:系统回顾和荟萃分析抗阻训练对生活质量的影响。疲劳,物理功能,以及被诊断患有癌症接受化疗的人的肌肉力量。
    方法:电子数据库PubMed,CochraneCentral,CINAHL,SCOPUS和WebofScience进行了系统搜索,以比较抗阻训练对生活质量的影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。疲劳,物理功能,接受化疗的成年人的下半身和上半身肌肉力量。使用随机效应模型汇集标准化平均差(SMD)。使用随机试验的偏倚风险工具(RoB2)评估偏倚风险。
    结果:包括561名参与者的7个随机对照试验。7项随机对照试验的汇总结果显示化疗期间的抗阻训练显著提高了下半身力量(n=555,SMD0.33,95%CI0.12to0.53,中等质量证据,I2=23%)与对照相比。没有证据表明阻力训练对生活质量有影响(n=373,SMD0.13,95%CI-0.15至0.42,低质量证据,I2=0%),疲劳(n=373,SMD-0.08,95%CI-0.37至0.22,低质量证据,I2=20%),身体功能(n=198,SMD0.61,95%CI-0.73至1.95,极低质量证据,I2=83%),或上身强度(n=413,SMD0.37,95%CI-0.07至0.80,非常低质量的证据,I2=69%)。
    结论:与对照组相比,抗阻训练可以改善化疗患者的下半身力量。
    OBJECTIVE: To systematically review and meta-analyse the efficacy of resistance training on quality of life (QOL), fatigue, physical function, and muscular strength in people diagnosed with cancer undergoing chemotherapy.
    METHODS: Electronic databases PubMed, Cochrane Central, CINAHL, SCOPUS and Web of Science were systematically searched for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effects of resistance training to control on QOL, fatigue, physical function, and lower-body and upper-body muscular strength in adults undergoing chemotherapy. Standardised mean differences (SMDs) were pooled using a random effects model. Risk of bias was assess using the risk of bias tool for randomised trials (RoB 2).
    RESULTS: Seven RCTs encompassing 561 participants were included. The pooled results of seven RCTs showed that resistance training during chemotherapy significantly improved lower-body strength (n = 555, SMD 0.33, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.53, moderate-quality evidence, I2 = 23%) compared to control. There was no evidence for an effect of resistance training on QOL (n = 373, SMD 0.13, 95% CI -0.15 to 0.42, low-quality evidence, I2 = 0%), fatigue (n = 373, SMD -0.08, 95% CI -0.37 to 0.22, low-quality evidence, I2 = 20%), physical function (n = 198, SMD 0.61, 95% CI -0.73 to 1.95, very low-quality evidence, I2 = 83%), or upper-body strength (n = 413, SMD 0.37, 95% CI -0.07 to 0.80, very low-quality evidence, I2 = 69%).
    CONCLUSIONS: Resistance training may improve lower-body strength in patients undergoing chemotherapy treatment compared to control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    并非所有合格的乳腺癌(BC)患者都能负担得起21基因复发评分(RS)测定的昂贵测试。本研究旨在确定与高危RS相关的临床病理因素,并检查这些因素是否与化疗的益处相关。
    诊断为早期BC的患者,node-negative,从监测中发现雌激素受体阳性疾病,流行病学,和结束结果OncotypeDX数据库。
    我们包括74,605名患者。那些级别较高(p<0.001)和孕激素受体阴性(PRNeg)(p<0.001)的患者发生高风险RS的几率最高。其中,3.2%,10.1%,39.1%,18.6%,41.6%,80.1%有PR阳性(PRPos)/高分化(G1)的高危RS肿瘤,PR位置/中度分化(G2),PRPos/差和/或未分化(G3),PRNeg/G1、PRNeg/G2和PRNeg/G3组,分别。在高风险RS队列中,接受化疗与改善乳腺癌特异性生存率(p=0.010)和总生存率(p<0.001)相关。然而,在PRNeg/G3疾病患者和其他组中,按级别和PR状态进行分层后,化疗无生存获益(均p≥0.05).
    我们的研究有助于改进RS检测的患者选择,鉴于其经济影响,这是至关重要的。然而,21基因RS仍然是治疗决策的关键。
    UNASSIGNED: Not all eligible breast cancer (BC) patients could afford the expensive test of 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay. This study aimed to identify clinicopathological factors associated with high-risk RS and examine whether these factors correlate with the benefit of chemotherapy.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients diagnosed with early-stage BC, node-negative, and estrogen receptor-positive disease were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Oncotype DX database.
    UNASSIGNED: We included 74,605 patients. Those with higher grade (p < 0.001) and progesterone receptor-negative (PR Neg) (p < 0.001) had the highest odds of a high-risk RS. Among them, 3.2%, 10.1%, 39.1%, 18.6%, 41.6%, and 80.1% had high-risk RS tumors in PR-positive (PR Pos)/well-differentiated (G1), PR Pos/moderately differentiated (G2), PR Pos/poorly and/or undifferentiated (G3), PR Neg/G1, PR Neg/G2, and PR Neg/G3 groups, respectively. Receipt of chemotherapy was associated with improved breast cancer-specific survival (p = 0.010) and overall survival (p < 0.001) in high-risk RS cohort. However, there were no survival benefits from chemotherapy in patients with PR Neg/G3 disease and other groups after stratification by grade and PR status (all p ≥ 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: Our study aids in refining patient selection for the RS testing, which is crucial given its economic implications. However, 21-gene RS remains pivotal for treatment decision-making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:很少有研究对儿童室管膜瘤幸存者的后期效应负担进行表征。为了解决这个差距,我们在基于人群的室管膜瘤幸存者队列中使用真实世界的卫生服务数据检查了这些后遗症.
    方法:安大略省所有18岁以下被诊断为室管膜瘤的患者,加拿大在1987年至2015年期间,他们从最近的儿科癌症事件(索引日期)中存活了至少5年,与人口对照组1:5相匹配。根据与省级卫生服务数据的联系,比较了幸存者和对照组之间多种医学结局和功能结局的累积发生率.
    结果:在96名幸存者中,77.1%接受了照射,9.4%接受了顺铂治疗。在指数发布后的10年,幸存者的全因死亡率风险明显较高(7.1%,95%置信区间[CI]:1.0-13.3vs.0.3%,95%CI:0.0-1.0;p=.0002),非产科住院(45.1%,95%CI:32.6-56.7vs.10.6%,95%CI:7.6-14.1;p<.0001),中风(6.5%,95%CI:2.3-13.7vs.0%;p<.0001),需要放大装置的严重听力损失(7.5%,95%CI:2.7-15.7vs.0%;p<.0001),接受家庭护理服务(27.6%,95%CI:18.5-37.5vs.7.7%,95%CI:5.3-10.7;p<.0001),并提交残疾支持处方索赔(24.0%,95%CI:14.8-34.3vs.5.4%,95%CI:3.5-7.8;p<0.0001)与对照组相比。
    结论:儿科室管膜瘤幸存者极易出现严重的晚期后遗症,包括死亡,中风,严重的听力损失,和残疾。迫切需要努力改善风险分层方法,以减轻风险较低疾病儿童的毒性疗法暴露。预防或降低晚期后遗症风险的干预措施对于优化幸存者的长期健康至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Few studies have characterized the burden of late effects among childhood ependymoma survivors. To address this gap, we examined these sequelae using real-world health services data in a population-based ependymoma survivor cohort.
    METHODS: All individuals younger than 18 years diagnosed with an ependymoma in Ontario, Canada between 1987 and 2015 who had survived at least 5 years from their latest pediatric cancer event (index date) were matched 1:5 with population controls. Following linkage with provincial health services data, the cumulative incidences of multiple medical and functional outcomes between survivors and controls were compared.
    RESULTS: Among 96 survivors, 77.1% had been irradiated and 9.4% had received cisplatin. At 10 years post-index, survivors were at significantly higher risk of all-cause mortality (7.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.0-13.3 vs. 0.3%, 95% CI: 0.0-1.0; p = .0002), non-obstetric hospitalization (45.1%, 95% CI: 32.6-56.7 vs. 10.6%, 95% CI: 7.6-14.1; p < .0001), stroke (6.5%, 95% CI: 2.3-13.7 vs. 0%; p < .0001), severe hearing loss requiring an amplification device (7.5%, 95% CI: 2.7-15.7 vs. 0%; p < .0001), receiving homecare service (27.6%, 95% CI: 18.5-37.5 vs. 7.7%, 95% CI: 5.3-10.7; p < .0001), and submitting a disability support prescription claim (24.0%, 95% CI: 14.8-34.3 vs. 5.4%, 95% CI: 3.5-7.8; p < .0001) compared to controls.
    CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric ependymoma survivors are highly vulnerable to severe late sequelae, including death, stroke, severe hearing loss, and disability. Urgent efforts are needed to improve risk-stratification approaches that mitigate exposure to toxic therapies for children with lower risk disease. Interventions to prevent or decrease the risk of developing late sequelae are critical to optimizing survivor long-term health.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胰腺腺鳞癌(ASCP)仅占所有胰腺外分泌癌的1-4%,预后特别差。由于病例数量少,ASCP化疗的疗效尚不清楚,很少有研究评估转化意向化疗。
    方法:一名76岁妇女因上腹痛和恶心被转诊到我院。术前对比增强的多探测器行计算机断层扫描(MDCT)扫描显示,胰头动脉期有17×17mm低密度肿瘤,边缘不明确。肿瘤累及肝总动脉,左肝动脉从肝总动脉分叉,胃十二指肠动脉,并与门静脉接触。氟脱氧葡萄糖-正电子发射断层扫描(FDG-PET)显示胰头吸收,但没有远处转移的证据。该肿瘤被诊断为胰头腺癌,由于累及肝总动脉和左动脉,因此分期不可切除。因此,该患者接受了7个月内使用吉西他滨和nab-紫杉醇治疗胰腺导管腺癌的7个疗程的转换意向化疗.化疗后,在对比增强MDCT上,肿瘤缩小至10×10mm。因此,肿瘤与肝总动脉、肝左动脉和门静脉的主要血管之间的边界变得清晰,动脉受累的肿瘤被评估为被释放。肿瘤与门静脉的接触也减少到小于门静脉周长的一半。FDG-PET显示肿瘤中的积累减少。因此,肿瘤被认为是可切除的,并进行胰十二指肠切除术。肿瘤和主要血管容易解剖,R0切除。患者无重大并发症,术后第28天出院。病理检查显示肿瘤为ASCP。患者在手术后7个月存活且无复发。这是首次报道在使用吉西他滨和nab-紫杉醇方案进行转换意向化疗后,成功进行R0切除最初不可切除的ASCP。
    结论:使用吉西他滨和nab-紫杉醇方案的转换意向化疗可能对ASCP有效。
    BACKGROUND: Adenosquamous carcinoma of the pancreas (ASCP) accounts for only 1-4% of all pancreatic exocrine cancers and has a particularly poor prognosis. The efficacy of chemotherapy for ASCP remains unknown because of the small number of cases, and few studies have evaluated conversion-intended chemotherapy.
    METHODS: A 76-year-old woman was referred to our hospital because of epigastric pain and nausea. A preoperative contrast-enhanced multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) scan revealed a 17 × 17 mm low-density tumor with an ill-defined margin at the arterial phase in the pancreatic head. The tumor involved the common hepatic artery, left hepatic artery bifurcated from the common hepatic artery, and gastroduodenal artery, and was in contact with the portal vein. Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) showed an uptake in the pancreatic head but no evidence of distant metastasis. The tumor was diagnosed as an adenocarcinoma of the pancreatic head and staged unresectable because the common and left hepatic arteries were involved. Hence, the patient underwent seven courses of conversion-intended chemotherapy using gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma over 7 months. After chemotherapy, the tumor shrank to 10 × 10 mm on contrast-enhanced MDCT. Consequently, the boundary between the tumor and major vessels of the common and left hepatic arteries and the portal vein became clear, and the involvement of the arteries with the tumor was evaluated to be released. The contact of the tumor to the portal vein also reduced to less than half the circumference of the portal vein. FDG-PET showed decreased accumulation in the tumor. Hence, the tumor was judged resectable, and pancreaticoduodenectomy was performed. The tumor and major blood vessels were easily dissected and R0 resection was achieved. The patient experienced no major complications and was discharged on postoperative day 28. The tumor was revealed as ASCP via pathological examination. The patient is alive and recurrence-free seven months after surgery. This is the first report of successful R0 resection for an initially unresectable ASCP following conversion-intended chemotherapy using gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel regimen.
    CONCLUSIONS: Conversion-intended chemotherapy using gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel regimen may be effective for ASCP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:国家综合癌症网络(NCCN)指南推荐了多种具有特定给药方案的药物组合来治疗早期乳腺癌,允许医生提供识别个体患者复杂性的治疗,包括合并症,和患者-医生偏好。虽然指导方案的使用随着时间的推移而发生了变化,很少有数据来描述早期乳腺癌治疗如何随着时间的推移而发生的变化。
    方法:在2006-2019年间在北加利福尼亚KaiserPermanente和KaiserPermanenteWashington接受I-IIIA期乳腺癌治疗的34,109名妇女中,随着时间的推移,我们呈现了化疗方案的变化,并探索NCCN指导方案(GR)的使用,当所述方案未包括在指南中时使用的指南方案,称为时间不一致疗法(TDR),和非指导方案(NGR)。结果通过药物组合和随时间呈现。
    结果:在接受化疗的12,506名妇女中,77.4%(n=9681)接受了GR,9.1%(n=1140)收到TDR,13.5%(n=1685)收到NGRs。2006年,AC-T(环磷酰胺-阿霉素,紫杉醇)是最常见的方案,到2019年,TC(环磷酰胺-多西他赛)成为最普遍的。NGR在环磷酰胺-甲氨蝶呤-5-氟尿嘧啶(CMF);环磷酰胺-多柔比星-紫杉醇-曲妥珠单抗(ACTH)和紫杉醇-曲妥珠单抗(TH)中更为常见。GR的使用随着时间的推移而增加(p趋势<0.001),虽然NGR(在给药方案和药物组合方面)和TDR的使用有所减少,虽然模式因药物组合而异。
    结论:随着时间的推移,化疗方案发生了显著变化,随着越来越多地使用GR。这些数据对于了解社区医疗保健环境中化疗方案非常重要。
    OBJECTIVE: The National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines recommend a variety of drug combinations with specific administration schedules for the treatment of early-stage breast cancer, allowing physicians to deliver treatments recognizing individual patient complexities, including comorbidities, and patient-physician preference. While use of guideline regimens has shifted over time, there is little data to describe changes in how treatment for early-stage breast cancer has evolved over time.
    METHODS: In a cohort of 34,109 women treated for stage I-IIIA breast cancer between 2006-2019 at Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Kaiser Permanente Washington, we present the changes in chemotherapy regimens over time, and explore use of NCCN-guideline regimens (GR), guideline regimens used when said regimens were not included in guidelines, referred to as time-discordant regimens (TDR), and non-guideline regimens (NGR). Results are presented by drug combination and over time.
    RESULTS: Among 12,506 women receiving chemotherapy, 77.4% (n = 9681) received GRs, 9.1% (n = 1140) received TDRs, and 13.5% (n = 1685) received NGRs. In 2006, AC-T (cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin, paclitaxel) was the most common regimen, with TC (cyclophosphamide-docetaxel) becoming the most prevalent by 2019. NGRs were more common in cyclophosphamide-methotrexate-5-fluorouracil (CMF); cyclophosphamide-doxorubicin-paclitaxel-trastuzumab (ACTH); and paclitaxel-trastuzumab (TH). The use of GR has increased over time (p-trend < 0.001), while use of NGR (both in terms of administration schedule and drug combination) and TDR have decreased, although patterns vary by drug combination.
    CONCLUSIONS: Chemotherapy delivery has changed markedly over time, with a move toward more use of GR. These data are important for understanding the landscape of chemotherapy delivery in community healthcare settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:胰腺癌行根治性胰腺切除术的患者常发生肝转移。除了化疗,已经探索了针对肝脏病变的各种局部治疗方法。然而,关于射频消融(RFA)作为肝转移的局部治疗方法的研究有限。因此,我们进行了这项回顾性研究以提供临床证据.
    方法:这是一个单中心,回顾性,队列研究。根治性胰十二指肠切除术后,32例患者发生异时性肝转移,病灶少于3个,其中最大的直径小于3厘米。这些患者接受了化疗和RFA的联合治疗。化疗8周后,患者因肝脏病变接受RFA治疗.进行了额外的化疗,监测患者的肿瘤状态和生存率。这项研究的主要终点是总生存期(OS)。使用Cox风险模型分析影响OS的因素。
    结果:在32例患者中,平均OS为28.4个月.单因素和多因素Cox回归分析显示肝转移时间(以月为单位)(HR=0.04,95%CI:0.01至0.19;P<0.001),肝转移的数量(HR=7.08,95%CI:1.85至27.08,P=0.004),和PD(进行性疾病)对第二轮化疗的反应(HR=29.50,95%CI:1.46至597.27;P=0.027)是生存率较差的独立预测因素。
    结论:对于胰十二指肠切除术后肝转移患者,RFA联合化疗是安全的。早期复发(≤12个月),三个肝转移性病变,对第二轮化疗的反应差与低生存率相关。
    OBJECTIVE: Hepatic metastasis frequently occurs in patients who have undergone radical pancreatic resection for pancreatic cancer. Besides chemotherapy, various local treatment approaches targeting hepatic lesions have been explored. However, research on radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as a localized therapy for hepatic metastasis is limited. Therefore, we conducted this retrospective study to provide clinical evidence.
    METHODS: This is a single-center, retrospective, cohort study. After radical pancreaticoduodenectomy, 32 patients developed metachronous hepatic metastasis with fewer than 3 lesions, the largest of which was less than 3 cm in diameter. These patients underwent combined treatment with chemotherapy and RFA. After 8 weeks of chemotherapy, patients received RFA for hepatic lesions. Additional chemotherapy was administered, and the patients\' tumor status and survival were monitored. The primary endpoint of this study was overall survival (OS). Factors affecting OS were analyzed using the Cox risk model.
    RESULTS: Among the 32 patients, the mean OS was 28.4 months. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that the time (in months) of liver metastasis (HR = 0.04, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.19; P < 0.001), the number of liver metastases (HR = 7.08, 95% CI: 1.85 to 27.08, P = 0.004), and PD (progressive disease) response to the second round of chemotherapy (HR = 29.50, 95% CI: 1.46 to 597.27; P = 0.027) were independent predictors of poorer survival.
    CONCLUSIONS: Combined therapy with RFA and chemotherapy is safe in patients with hepatic metastasis after radical pancreaticoduodenectomy. Early recurrence (≤12 months), three liver metastatic lesions, and a poor response to the second round of chemotherapy were associated with poor survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    卵巢癌(OC)是美国最致命的妇科癌症。在不同类型的OC中,浆液性卵巢癌(SOC)是最常见的。转录组学技术产生广泛的基因表达数据,然而,这些基因中只有少数与临床诊断相关。
    特征选择(FS)方法解决了大量数据集中的高维度挑战。这项研究提出了一个计算框架,该框架应用FS技术来识别与SOC患者基于铂的化疗反应高度相关的基因。使用来自基因表达综合(GEO)数据库的SOC数据集,采用LASSO和varSelRFFS方法。机器学习分类算法,如随机森林(RF)和支持向量机(SVM)也被用来评估模型的性能。
    提出的框架已经确定了具有9个和10个基因的生物标志物组,这些基因与SOC患者的铂-紫杉醇和仅铂反应高度相关,分别。预测模型已经使用鉴定的基因签名进行了训练,并且实现了90%以上的准确度。
    在这项研究中,我们提出,应用多种特征选择方法不仅有效地减少识别的生物标志物的数量,增强它们的生物学相关性,同时也证实了药物反应预测模型在癌症治疗中的有效性。
    UNASSIGNED: Ovarian cancer (OC) is the most lethal gynecological cancer in the United States. Among the different types of OC, serous ovarian cancer (SOC) stands out as the most prevalent. Transcriptomics techniques generate extensive gene expression data, yet only a few of these genes are relevant to clinical diagnosis.
    UNASSIGNED: Methods for feature selection (FS) address the challenges of high dimensionality in extensive datasets. This study proposes a computational framework that applies FS techniques to identify genes highly associated with platinum-based chemotherapy response on SOC patients. Using SOC datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database, LASSO and varSelRF FS methods were employed. Machine learning classification algorithms such as random forest (RF) and support vector machine (SVM) were also used to evaluate the performance of the models.
    UNASSIGNED: The proposed framework has identified biomarkers panels with 9 and 10 genes that are highly correlated with platinum-paclitaxel and platinum-only response in SOC patients, respectively. The predictive models have been trained using the identified gene signatures and accuracy of above 90% was achieved.
    UNASSIGNED: In this study, we propose that applying multiple feature selection methods not only effectively reduces the number of identified biomarkers, enhancing their biological relevance, but also corroborates the efficacy of drug response prediction models in cancer treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号