Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) are highly tumorigenic, chemoresistant, and immune evasive. They emerge as a central driver that gives rise to the bulk of tumoral mass, modifies the tumor microenvironment (TME), and exploits it, leading to poor clinical outcomes for patients with cancer. The existence of CSCs thus accounts for the failure of conventional therapies and immune surveillance. Identifying CSCs in solid tumors remains a significant challenge in modern oncology, with the use of cell surface markers being the primary strategy for studying, isolating, and enriching these cells. In this review, we explore CSC markers, focusing on the underlying signaling pathways that drive CSC self-renewal, which simultaneously makes them intrinsically chemoresistant and immune system evaders. We comprehensively discuss the autonomous and non-autonomous functions of CSCs, with particular emphasis on their interactions with the tumor microenvironment, especially immune cells. This reciprocal network enhances CSCs malignancy while compromising the surrounding niche, ultimately defining therapeutic vulnerabilities associated with each CSC marker. The most common CSCs surface markers addressed in this review-CD44, CD133, ICAM1/CD54, and LGR5-provide insights into the interplay between chemoresistance and immune evasion, two critically important phenomena in disease eradication. This new perspective on the state-of-the-art of CSCs will undoubtedly open new avenues for therapy.

The most important reason for dismal outcomes in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is the development of relapse. Leukemia stem cells (LSCs) are hypothesized to initiate relapse, and high CD34+CD38- LSC load is associated with poor prognosis. In 10% of AML patients, CD34 is not or is low expressed on the leukemic cells (<1%), and CD34+CD38- LSCs are absent. These patients are classified as CD34-negative. We aimed to determine whether the primitive marker CD133 can detect LSCs in CD34-negative AML. We retrospectively quantified 148 CD34-negative patients for proportions of CD34-CD133+ and CD133+CD38- cell fractions in the diagnostic samples of CD34-negative patients in the HOVON102 and HOVON132 trials. No prognostic difference was found between patients with high or low proportions of CD34-CD133+, which is found to be aberrantly expressed in AML. A high level of CD133+CD38- cells was not associated with poor overall survival, and expression in AML was similar to normal bone marrow. To conclude, CD133 is useful as an additional primitive marker for the detection of leukemic blast cells in CD34-negative AML. However, CD133+CD38 alone is not suitable for the detection of LSCs at diagnosis.

Glioma is the most prevalent type of primary central nervous system cancer, while glioblastoma (GBM) is its most aggressive variant, with a median survival of only 15 months when treated with maximal surgical resection followed by chemoradiation therapy (CRT). CD133 is a potentially significant GBM biomarker. However, current clinical biomarker studies rely on invasive tissue samples. These make prolonged data acquisition impossible, resulting in increased interest in the use of liquid biopsies. Our study, analyzed 7289 serum proteins from 109 patients with pathology-proven GBM obtained prior to CRT using the aptamer-based SOMAScan® proteomic assay technology. We developed a novel methodology that identified 24 proteins linked to both serum CD133 and 12-month overall survival (OS) through a multi-step machine learning (ML) analysis. These identified proteins were subsequently subjected to survival and clustering evaluations, categorizing patients into five risk groups that accurately predicted 12-month OS based on their protein profiles. Most of these proteins are involved in brain function, neural development, and/or cancer biology signaling, highlighting their significance and potential predictive value. Identifying these proteins provides a valuable foundation for future serum investigations as validation of clinically applicable GBM biomarkers can unlock immense potential for diagnostics and treatment monitoring.

BACKGROUND: Recent evidence suggests that the tumor stem cells that are responsible for the pathogenesis of gliomas have similar properties to those of neural stem cells. We have studied two of the most consistently expressed stem cell markers in gliomas, i.e., CD133 and Nestin, and compared them with respect to p53 expression and IDH status.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of expression of Nestin and CD133, and identify a correlation among various grades of diffuse glioma with IDH status and expression of p53.
METHODS: A cross-sectional retrospective study with 102 subjects for the expression of cancer stem cell markers; CD133 and Nestin and the correlation of their expression with that of p53 and IDH1 status in adult diffuse glioma. The study was conducted in the Departments of Pathology and Neurosurgery. The expression was assessed by immunohistochemistry on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded sections. The scoring of expression of CD133 and Nestin was adapted from Zhang et al. The scoring for p53 was adopted from Aruna et al. Results: The diffuse gliomas were graded based on WHO into grade II (30.3%), grade III (28.4%), and grade IV (41.3%). Among WHO grade IV, 59.4% were primary, and 40.4% were secondary glioblastomas. 73% of the diffuse gliomas were IDH mutant, and p53 showed an overall expression of 76.4%. The expression of CD133 and Nestin were compared with the increasing grades of diffuse gliomas, which, when plotted on ROC curves, had AUCs of 0.6806 and 0.6119, respectively. Their expression showed a positive correlation with the IDH status of the tumor.
CONCLUSIONS: Cancer stem cell markers CD133 and Nestin are expressed in diffuse glioma and have a higher expression with increasing WHO grade of malignancy. These cancer stem cell markers have shown significant association with the IDH-1 mutant status of diffuse gliomas. Hence, it can be inferred that diffuse gliomas with a higher expression of CD133 and Nestin have a poorer prognosis. Further, these cancer stem cell markers may be used as therapeutic targets in the future.

OBJECTIVE: Clinical data demonstrate that metformin exhibits antiproliferative, proapoptotic and antimetastatic actions. Here, correlative molecular studies were undertaken to determine the roles of transmembrane tumour necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand death receptors (DRs) and CD133, a glycoprotein biomarker of breast cancer (BC) stem cells, in the advantageous action of metformin on pathological and clinical outcomes in BC patients on neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
METHODS: We randomly assigned 70 nondiabetic BC patients in a 1:1 ratio to either neoadjuvant AC-T chemotherapy (4 cycles of adriamycin 60 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2, followed by 12 cycles of weekly paclitaxel 80 mg/m2) or AC-T with adjunct metformin (850 mg twice/day). The expressions of DR4, DR5 and CD133 were quantified in excised tissue samples with residual tumour cells.
RESULTS: The overall clinical response (odds ratio: 22.67 [2.77-185.18], P = .004), breast-conserving surgery (odds ratio: 3.67 [1.303-10.321], P = .014) and pathological complete response (β = 2.49 ± 1.13 [0.274-4.712], P = .028) rates were significantly improved in the metformin arm. Tissues obtained from the metformin arm had upregulated mRNA expression of DR4 (Mean delta cycle thresholds ± standard error of the mean: 2.68 ± 0.25 vs. 4.87 ± 0.53, P = .0003) and DR5 (0.21 ± 0.25 vs. 4.29 ± 0.95, P = .0004) compared to control arm. The enhanced DR expression negatively correlated with that of CD133 + BC stem cells, which was significantly reduced by metformin at both cytoplasmic/membranous (43.48 vs. 100.00%, P < .0001) and nuclear sites (4.35 vs. 95.00%, P < .0001).
CONCLUSIONS: Metformin improves clinical and pathological responses to neoadjuvant AC-T chemotherapy in BC via prompting directionally opposite changes in DRs (increments) and CD133 + (decrements) expressions. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT04170465, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04170465).

The novel Oxathiazinane derivative GP-2250 (Misetionamide) displays antineoplastic activity in vitro and in vivo, as previously shown in pancreatic cancer cells and in patient-derived mouse xenografts (PDX). Currently, GP 2250 is under phase I clinical trial in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). GP-2250 in combination with Gemcitabine displays a high synergistic capacity in various primary and established pancreatic cancer cell lines. Additionally, in the eight PDX models tested, the drug combination was superior in reducing tumor volume with an aggregate tumor regression (ATR) of 74% compared to Gemcitabine alone (ATR: 10%). Similarly, in a PDX maintenance setting following two weeks of treatment with nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine, the combination of GP-2250 plus Gemcitabine resulted in outstanding tumor control (ATR: 79%) compared to treatment with Gemcitabine alone (ATR: 60%). Furthermore, GP-2250 reduced the ratio of tumor-initiating CD133+ markers on the surface of PDAC cells in spheroid cultures, indicating a possible mechanism for the synergistic effect of both substances. Considering the high tolerability of GP 2250, these results may open up a new approach to maintenance therapy with GP-2250/Gemcitabine combination following nab-Paclitaxel plus Gemcitabine as first-line treatment.

OBJECTIVE: CD133, a cancer stem cells (CSC) marker, has been reported to be associated with treatment resistance and worse survival in triple-negative breast cancer (BC). However, the clinical relevance of CD133 expression in ER-positive/HER2-negative (ER + /HER2-) BC, the most abundant subtype, remains unknown.
METHODS: The BC cohorts from the Molecular Taxonomy of Breast Cancer International Consortium (METABRIC, n = 1904) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA, n = 1065) were used to obtain biological variables and gene expression data.
RESULTS: Epithelial cells were the exclusive source of CD133 gene expression in a bulk BC. CD133-high ER + /HER2- BC was associated with CD24, NOTCH1, DLL1, and ALDH1A1 gene expressions, as well as with WNT/β-Catenin, Hedgehog, and Notch signaling pathways, all characteristic for CSC. Consistent with a CSC phenotype, CD133-low BC was enriched with gene sets related to cell proliferation, such as G2M Checkpoint, MYC Targets V1, E2F Targets, and Ki67 gene expression. CD133-low BC was also linked with enrichment of genes related to DNA repair, such as BRCA1, E2F1, E2F4, CDK1/2. On the other hand, CD133-high tumors had proinflammatory microenvironment, higher activity of immune cells, and higher expression of genes related to inflammation and immune response. Finally, CD133-high tumors had better pathological complete response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in GSE25066 cohort and better disease-free survival and overall survival in both TCGA and METABRIC cohorts.
CONCLUSIONS: CD133-high ER + /HER2- BC was associated with CSC phenotype such as less cell proliferation and DNA repair, but also with enhanced inflammation, better response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and better prognosis.

Cancer stem cells (CSC), a small population of neoplastic cells, are associated with worse prognosis. The aim of this study was to evaluate the expression of ALDH1, CD117, CD133 and OCT4; potential markers of CSC; and their associations with the prognosis of women diagnosed with cervical cancer. This retrospective cohort study included 126 women diagnosed with cervical cancer whose biopsies were analyzed by immunohistochemistry. Median values of marked cells were used to define cutoff points for low and high expression. For specific survival, multivariate analyses showed statistical significance for lymph node metastases (HR 8.15; 95% CI 3.00-22.18) and borderline significance for high CD133 expression (p = 0.058). For overall survival, multivariate analyses showed statistical significance for IIA-IVB staging (HR 4.60; 95% CI 1.46-14.56), lymph node metastases (HR 5.13; 95% CI 12.02-13.03) and high CD133 expression (2.67; 95% CI 1.11-6.43). Considering only women with SCC, the same clinicopathological variables were associated with worse specific and overall survival in univariate analyses. However, higher expression of CD 133 (HR 11.10; 95% CI 2.42-50.94 and 6.00; 95% CI 2.02-17.87) and staging IIA-IVB (HR 5.96; 95% CI 1.30-27.34 and HR 12.47; 95% CI 2.45-63.54) respectively impacted negatively specific and overall survival, as multivariate analyses showed. Secondarily, it was observed that ALDH1 expression was associated with adenocarcinoma and CD117 expression with squamous cells carcinoma. Higher expression of CD133 was associated with worse specific and overall survival, indicating that it could have relevance as a clinical marker and therapeutic target.

BACKGROUND: Inherited retinal dystrophies (IRD) are one of the main causes of incurable blindness worldwide. IRD are caused by mutations in genes that encode essential proteins for the retina, leading to photoreceptor degeneration and loss of visual function. IRD generates an enormous global financial burden due to the lack of understanding of a significant part of its pathophysiology, molecular diagnosis, and the near absence of non-palliative treatment options. Patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC) for IRD seem to be an excellent option for addressing these questions, serving as exceptional tools for in-depth studies of IRD pathophysiology and testing new therapeutic approaches.
METHODS: From a cohort of 8 patients with PROM1-related IRD, we identified 3 patients carrying the same variant (c.1354dupT) but expressing three different IRD phenotypes: Cone and rod dystrophy (CORD), Retinitis pigmentosa (RP), and Stargardt disease type 4 (STGD4). These three target patients, along with one healthy relative from each, underwent comprehensive ophthalmic examinations and their genetic panel study was expanded through clinical exome sequencing (CES). Subsequently, non-integrative patient-derived iPSC were generated and fully characterized. Correction of the c.1354dupT mutation was performed using CRISPR/Cas9, and the genetic restoration of the PROM1 gene was confirmed through flow cytometry and western blotting in the patient-derived iPSC lines.
RESULTS: CES revealed that 2 target patients with the c.1354dupT mutation presented monoallelic variants in genes associated with the complement system or photoreceptor differentiation and peroxisome biogenesis disorders, respectively. The pluripotency and functionality of the patient-derived iPSC lines were confirmed, and the correction of the target mutation fully restored the capability of encoding Prominin-1 (CD133) in the genetically repaired patient-derived iPSC lines.
CONCLUSIONS: The c.1354dupT mutation in the PROM1 gene is associated to three distinct AR phenotypes of IRD. This pleotropic effect might be related to the influence of monoallelic variants in other genes associated with retinal dystrophies. However, further evidence needs to be provided. Future experiments should include gene-edited patient-derived iPSC due to its potential as disease modelling tools to elucidate this matter in question.

Placenta-specific protein 1 (PLAC-1) is a gene primarily expressed in the placenta and the testis. Interestingly, it is also found to be expressed in many solid tumors, and it is involved in malignant cell features. However, no evidence has been reported regarding the relationship between PLAC-1 and cancer stem cells (CSCs). In the current research, we explored the expression of the PLAC-1 molecule in prostate cancer stem cells (PCSCs) derived from the human PC-3 cell line. The enrichment of PCSCs was achieved using a three-dimensional cell culture technique known as the sphere-formation assay. To confirm the identity of PCSCs, we examined the expression of genes associated with stemness and pluripotency, such as SOX2, OCT4, Nanog, C-Myc, and KLF-4, as well as stem cell differentiation molecules like CD44 and CD133. These evaluations were conducted in both the PCSCs and the original tumor cells (parental cells) using real-time PCR and flow cytometry. Subsequently, we assessed the expression of the PLAC-1 molecule in both enriched cells and parental tumor cells at the gene and protein levels using the same techniques. The tumor cells from the PC-3 cell line formed spheroids with CSC characteristics in a non-adherent medium. The expression of SOX2, OCT4, Nanog, and C-Myc genes (p < 0.01), and the molecules CD44 and CD133 (p < 0.05) were significantly elevated in PCSCs compared to the parental cells. The expression of the PLAC-1 molecule in PCSCs showed a significant increase compared to the parental cells at both gene (p < 0.01) and protein (p < 0.001) levels. In conclusion, it was indicated for the first time that PLAC-1 is up-regulated in PCSCs derived from human PC-3 cell line. This study may propose PLAC-1 as a potential target in targeted therapies, which should be confirmed through further studies.