BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) classification of central nervous system (CNS) tumors necessitates testing of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1/2 gene mutation in patients with adult-type diffuse glioma (ADG) for better disease management. In clinical practice, the testing of IDH1 is primarily achieved using immunohistochemistry (IHC) specific to IDH1-R132, which carries a sensitivity of 80% and specificity of 100%. However, in some cases, non-specific background staining or regional heterogeneity in the protein expression of IDH1 may necessitate confirmatory genetic analysis. Robust and reliable assays are needed for IDH1/2 mutation testing. The aim of the current study was to detect IDH1 mutation in cfDNA and tissue of adult-type diffuse glioma with allele-specific qPCR.
METHODS: In the current study, IDH1-R132H mutation was analyzed in tumor tissue with paired cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in patients with ADG (n = 45) using IHC and competitive allele-specific Taqman PCR (CAST-PCR). Genomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) tissue and matched serum for cfDNA using commercially available kits. CAST-PCR with IHC for the detection of IDH1-R132H mutation was also compared.
RESULTS: The IDH1-R132H mutation was detected in 46.67% (21/45) cases and 57.78% (26/45) cases using IHC and allele-specific CAST-PCR. In cfDNA of matched IDH1-mutant FFPE tissue DNA, IDH1-R132H mutation was detected in 11.54% (3/26) using CAST-PCR. The concordance rate for IDH1-R132Hmutation between IHC and CAST-PCR was 80.77% (21/26).
CONCLUSIONS: The CAST-PCR assay is more precise and sensitive for  IDH1-R132Hdetection than traditional IHC, and IDH1-R132H mutation detection using cfDNA may add to the current methods of glioma genomic characterization.

BACKGROUND: A gatekeeper T790M mutation is thought to cause resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) treatment. The detection of a 2nd mutation is important for planning the next therapy when patients acquire resistance to the first line EGFR-TKI.
METHODS: We used a competitive allele-specific polymerase chain reaction (CAST-PCR) to analyze the incidence and clinical significance of T790M mutations in 153 lung adenocarcinomas with EGFR-activating mutations. To increase the sensitivity and specificity of the detection of T790M mutations, we subjected 20 of the 153 cases to a digital PCR. The genomic DNAs were extracted from frozen, surgically resected tumor tissue specimens.
RESULTS: The CAST-PCR detected T790M mutations in 45 (29.4%) of the 153 cases. The analytical sensitivity in the detection T790M mutations was 0.13-2.65% (average 0.27%, median 0.20%). In contrast, the digital PCR, detected T790M mutations in 8 (40%) out of 20 cases.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that the pretreatment incidence of T790M mutation was less than that reported in previous studies. In order to clinically use pretreatment EGFR T790M mutation identification method, we should clarify the adequate methods and tissue preserved status.