No established standard of care exists for relapsed/refractory (RR) follicular lymphoma (FL) after ≥2 prior therapies. We conducted indirect treatment comparisons (ITCs) to compare the efficacy and tolerability of mosunetuzumab with those of available treatments used in this setting.
A systematic literature review (SLR) and subsequent feasibility assessments were conducted to identify the most suitable comparator studies in terms of design, available endpoints and populations. Imbalances in patient characteristics between NCT02500407 and studies featuring aggregate or patient-level data availability were accounted for using matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) and propensity score-based methodologies, respectively.
ZUMA-5, ELARA, DELTA, DYNAMO, UNITY-NHL, AUGMENT and NCT01897571 passed the MAIC feasibility assessment. Patient-level data were available from GADOLIN, CONTRALTO and NCT02257567. MAIC results generally favored mosunetuzumab over tazemetostat in EHZ2wild-type patients for all outcomes and over PI3K inhibitors for complete response (CR), objective response rate (ORR), discontinuations due to adverse events and progression-free survival (PFS) with umbralisib. MAICs favored CART therapies for PFS and, to a lesser extent, ORR and CR. Comparisons with anti-CD20 antibody-based regimens yielded mixed results.
ITCs suggest that mosunetuzumab may lead to superior outcomes over tazemetostat (in EHZ2wild-type patients) and PI3K inhibitors and may be a promising alternative to re-challenging with a different anti-CD20 regimen in patients who relapse after ≥2 prior anti-CD20 lines. Although preliminary results somewhat favored CART therapies, limitations and uncertainties remain because of intrinsic differences in study design. Mosunetuzumab could thus be a promising treatment option for patients with RR FL after ≥2 prior therapies.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is characterized by recurrent relapses. Consequently, patients receive multiple therapy lines, including alkylating agents and immune modulators, which have been associated with secondary malignancies such as myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS). Anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CART) therapy is efficacious in patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) MM. However, the long-term complications, particularly MDS, are not well understood. Whether CART therapy causes or promotes MDS has not been thoroughly investigated. In this study, we explored the causal relationship between MDS and CART therapy. We retrospectively examined the prevalence of MDS-related morphological and mutational changes before and after administration of CART therapy in five patients. Among them, four developed MDS after CART therapy, while one had pre-existing MDS prior to CART. None of the four patients who developed post-CART MDS showed morphological MDS changes prior to CART therapy. However, all four patients exhibited molecular alterations associated with MDS in their pre-CART as well as post-CART therapy bone marrow. No new mutations were observed. Our findings provide initial evidence suggesting that anti-BCMA CART therapy in MM may promote expansion of pre-existing MDS clones rather than causing development of new clones.

UNASSIGNED: CD19-targeting chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CART) therapy is a promising treatment for relapsed/refractory non-Hodgkin lymphoma, but most patients experience post-CART progression. We describe our institutional experience of salvage radiotherapy (SRT) in this setting.
UNASSIGNED: Of 94 patients who received CART therapy from 2018 to 2020, 21 received SRT for post-CART progression. Patients were divided into two groups: locoregional disease (n = 9 [43 %], all disease encompassable within an RT field) and advanced disease (n = 12 [57 %]). Patterns of failure, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and toxicity were assessed.
UNASSIGNED: Median time from CART infusion to SRT was 4.0 months (range, 0.6-11.5 months). In the locoregional disease group, 8/9 patients (89 %) were treated with comprehensive SRT to a median dose of 37.5 Gy in a median of 15 fractions. In the advanced disease group, all patients (n = 12) were treated with focal SRT to a median dose of 20.8 Gy in a median of 5 fractions. Median follow-up post-SRT was 15.2 months. In-field response was observed in 8/9 (89 %) in the locoregional disease and 8/9 (89 %) evaluable patients in the advanced disease groups. 17/18 evaluable patients (94 %) patients experienced post-SRT progression, all with a distant component. Median OS was 7.4 months; 21 months for locoregional disease versus 2.4 months for advanced disease (p = 0.0002). Median PFS was 1.1 month, and similarly poor regardless of group. No grade ≥ 3 toxicities occurred.
UNASSIGNED: SRT post-CART therapy appears safe with encouraging in-field response but high rates of out-of-field progression, even for those presenting with locoregional disease, highlighting the need for integration of novel systemic agents.

Follicular lymphoma, the most common indolent lymphoma, though highly responsive to therapy is coupled with multiple relapses for the majority of patients. Advances in biologic understanding of molecular events in lymphoma cells and the tumor microenvironment, along with novel cellular and targeted therapies, suggest this may soon change. Here we first review the development of the molecular concepts and classification of follicular lymphoma, along with therapeutic development of treatments based on chemotherapy plus monoclonal antibodies targeting CD20. We then focus on developments over the last decade in further defining follicular lymphoma pathophysiology, leading to targeted therapeutics, as well as novel immunotherapeutic strategies effective against B cell lymphomas including follicular, particularly patients with advanced stage disease. Additional alterations beyond the hallmark t(14;18) translocation are necessary for development of follicular lymphoma. Epigenetic mutations are almost universally identified in follicular lymphoma, most commonly involving histone-lysine N-methyltransferase 2D (KMT2D, the histone acetyltransferases, cAMP response element-binding protein binding protein (CREBBP) and E1A binding protein P300 (EP300) and the histone methyltransferase enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2). Mutations are also commonly identified in other proliferation/survival pathways such as B-cell receptor, RAS, mTOR and JAK-STAT pathways, as well as immune escape mutations. The host immune response plays a key role as well, based on studies correlating various immune cell subsets and gene expression signatures with outcomes. Over the last decade, many therapeutic options beyond the commonly used bendamustine-rituximab induction regimen have become available or are being investigated. We focus on these newer agents in the relapsed setting. New antibody-based agents include the naked CD19 directed antibody tafasitamab, the CD79b directed antibody drug conjugate (ADC) polatuzumab vedotin and the CD47 directed antibody magrolimab that targets macrophages rather than FL cells directly. Immune modulation by lenalidomide has moved to earlier lines of therapy and in combinations. Several small molecule inhibitors of proliferation signal pathways involving PI3kinase and BTK have activity against FL. Apoptotic pathway modulators also have activity. With increasing recognition of the high rate of epigenetic mutations in FL, HDAC inhibition has a role. More importantly, the EZH2 inhibitor tazemetostat is FDA approved for FL after 2 prior lines of therapy. The most exciting data currently involve immune attack against follicular lymphoma by chimeric antigen receptor T-cells (CART) or bispecific antibody constructs. Given these multiple potentially non-crossreactive mechanisms, studies of rationally designed combination strategies hold the promise of improving outcomes and possibly cure of follicular lymphoma.

UNASSIGNED: Chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CARTs) against CD19 antigen represent an effective therapy for relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (rrDLBCL). There is no diagnostic test able to predict which patients with residual disease will relapse from those that will reach a delayed complete response. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan (PET-CT) is characterized by a significant number of false positive results after immunotherapy. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may be a good-useful tool to quantify minimal residual disease and for monitoring disease response.
UNASSIGNED: We present a patient with DLBCL treated with CART cells in which we tested the combined use of ctDNA and PET-CT scan.
UNASSIGNED: Disease reassessment with PET-CT scan showed a partial remission (3 weeks) and a very good partial remission (2 months). A clinical progression at 3 months was confirmed with PET-CT scan. Levels of ctDNA progressively decreased and became undetectable. An initial increase in KMT2D p.E4385G variant allele frequency confirmed disease progression.
UNASSIGNED: Our case shows how the complementary use of ctDNA and PET-CT scan could be a helpful tool in the clinical management of these patients.

Two hundred two people living with HIV (PLWH) selected from outpatients at the Infectious Disease Institute, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, in Rome (Italy) were consecutively enrolled from May to July 2021. We used an anonymous telephone questionnaire to investigate opinions of PLWH about combined antiretroviral (ARV) therapy and long-acting (LA) formulations of ARVs. All invited participants completed the questionnaire (100%). We found that most PLWH evaluated taking HIV pills for the rest of their life as a continuous, but undemanding commitment (61.4%; n = 124), although they were willing to stop the daily intake of HIV drugs (78.2%, n = 158). Moreover, most PLWH were unaware of the existence of LA therapies at the time of the investigation (60.4%, n = 122). Almost half the PLWH evaluated the need for injections in the hospital as an obstacle (51.4%, n = 104). Regarding the preference between monthly injections and taking pills everyday, most PLWH (68.8%, n = 139) stated that the injection was more advantageous than pills even if they had some pain/swelling at the injection site. The concern about LA therapy indicated most by PLWH was the possible lower efficacy of the drug (83.7%, n = 169). Regarding the possible benefits of LA therapy, those reported most by PLWH were feeling freer because they did not have to remember to take pills everyday (68,8%, n = 139). In conclusion, to date, PLWH in our cohort seem willing to accept LA therapy, but still show some concern about the efficacy of the new therapy and the obligation to come to the hospital to receive it. Thus, clinicians must take into account the needs of their patients and help them overcome their concerns to facilitate the transition to this new therapeutic modality. Clinical Trial Registration Number ID: 2424.

The concept of allogeneic cell therapy was first presented over 60 years ago with hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. However, complications such as graft versus host disease (GVHD) and regimen-related toxicities remained as major obstacles. To maximize the effect of graft versus leukemia, while minimizing the effect of GVHD, donor lymphocyte infusion was utilized. This idea, which was used against viral infections, postulated that adoptive transfer of virus-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes could reconstitute specific immunity and eliminate virus infected cells and led to the idea of banking third party cytotoxic T cells (CTLs). T cell exhaustion sometimes became a problem and difficulty arose in creating robust CTLs. However, the introduction of induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) lessens such problems, and by using iPSC technology, unlimited numbers of allogeneic rejuvenated CTLs with robust and proliferative cytotoxic activity can be created. Despite this revolutionary concept, several concerns still exist, such as immunorejection by recipient cells and safety issues of gene editing. In this review, we describe approaches to a feasible \"off-the-shelf\" therapy that can be distributed rapidly worldwide. We also offer perspectives on the future of allogeneic cell cancer immunotherapy.

Despite the increasing urgency of the problem of treating small cell lung cancer (SCLC), information on the causes of its development is fragmentary. There is no complete understanding of the features of antitumor immunity and the role of the microenvironment in the development of SCLC resistance. This impedes the development of new methods for the diagnosis and treatment of SCLC. Lung cancer and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have common pathogenetic factors. COPD is a risk factor for lung cancer including SCLC. Therefore, the search for effective approaches to prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of SCLC in patients with COPD is an urgent task. This review provides information on the etiology and pathogenesis of SCLC, analyses the effectiveness of current treatment options, and critically evaluates the potential of chimeric antigen receptor T cells therapy (CART therapy) in SCLC. Moreover, we discuss potential links between lung cancer and COPD and the role of endothelium in the development of COPD. Finally, we propose a new approach for increasing the efficacy of CART therapy in SCLC.

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells (CART) therapies have changed and continue to change the treatment paradigms for B-cell malignancies because they can achieve durable complete remission in patients in whom multiple lines of treatment have failed. These unprecedented results have led to the widespread use of anti-CD19 CART therapy for patients with relapsed and refractory aggressive large B-cell lymphomas. While long-term follow-up data show that about one-third of patients achieve prolonged complete remission and are potentially cured, the majority of patients either do not respond to CD19 CART therapy or eventually relapse after CD19 CART therapy. These results are, on the one hand, driving intense research into identifying mechanisms of relapse and, on the other hand, inspiring the development of novel strategies to overcome resistance. This review summarizes current clinical outcomes of CART immunotherapy in B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas, describes the most up-to-date understanding of mechanisms of relapse and discusses novel strategies to address resistance to CART therapy. We are indeed at the beginning of a scientific trek to explore the mechanisms of resistance, seek out new, more effective treatment approaches based on these discoveries and to boldly go where no other therapy has gone before!

BACKGROUND: Glioblastoma multiforme is a malignant intracranial neoplasm that constitutes a therapeutic challenge because of the associated high morbidity and mortality given the lack of effective approved medication and aggressive nature of the tumor. However, there has been extensive research recently to address the reasons implicated in the resistant nature of the tumor to pharmaceutical compounds, which have resulted in several clinical trials investigating promising treatment approaches.
METHODS: We reviewed literature published since 2010 from PUBMED and several annual meeting abstracts through 15 September 2020. Selected articles included those relevant to topics of glioblastoma tumor biology, original basic research, clinical trials, seminal reviews, and meta-analyses. We provide a discussion based on the collected evidence regarding the challenging factors encountered during treatment, and we highlighted the relevant trials of novel therapies including immunotherapy and targeted medication.
RESULTS: Selected literature revealed four main factors implicated in the low efficacy encountered with investigational treatments which included: (1) blood-brain barrier; (2) immunosuppressive microenvironment; (3) genetic heterogeneity; (4) external factors related to previous systemic treatment that can modulate tumor microenvironment. Investigational therapies discussed in this review were classified as immunotherapy and targeted therapy. Immunotherapy included: (1) immune checkpoint inhibitors; (2) adoptive cell transfer therapy; (3) therapeutic vaccines; (4) oncolytic virus therapy. Targeted therapy included tyrosine kinase inhibitors and other receptor inhibitors. Finally, we provide our perspective on future directions in treatment of glioblastoma.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the limited success in development of effective therapeutics in glioblastoma, many treatment approaches hold potential promise including immunotherapy and novel combinational drugs. Addressing the molecular landscape and resistant immunosuppressive nature of glioblastoma are imperative in further development of effective treatments.