C2 dorsal root ganglion

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:颈痛和头痛可由外侧寰枢关节(LAA关节)引起。这种疼痛可以通过关节内注射局部麻醉药来诊断。一种广泛使用的技术可以进入外侧寰枢关节,但是这种方法可能很危险,因为椎动脉很接近,硬脑膜囊,和C2脊神经和背根神经节。
    目的:目的是描述和测试一种用于进入左心耳关节的新技术,该技术避免了关节后面的结构。
    方法:描述了新技术,并测试了10例单侧枕下疼痛患者的耐受性,和LAA关节上的压痛,以及SPECTCT显示的LAA关节病的证据。该技术需要沿着与C2层的背表面相切的轨迹插入针。它涉及获得C2层和C2椎弓根的下降视图。
    结论:在所有情况下,C2椎弓根很容易识别,并允许针头在关节后面的神经血管结构下方渐近通过。C2层的触觉反应提供了有关LAA关节尾端针深度的重要反馈。
    BACKGROUND: Neck pain and headaches can arise from the lateral atlanto-axial joint (LAA joint). This pain can be diagnosed with intra-articular injections of local anesthetic. A widely used technique for access to the lateral atlanto-axial joint uses a posterior approach, but this approach can be hazardous because of the proximity of the vertebral artery, the dural sac, and the C2 spinal nerve and dorsal root ganglion.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective was to describe and test a new technique for accessing the LAA joint that avoids structures that lie behind the joint.
    METHODS: The new technique was described, and tested for tolerance in 10 patients with unilateral suboccipital pain, and tenderness over the LAA joint, along with evidence of LAA joint arthropathy on SPECT CT. The technique requires inserting a needle along a trajectory tangential to the dorsal surface of the C2 lamina. It involves obtaining a declined view of the C2 lamina and C2 pedicle.
    CONCLUSIONS: In all cases, the C2 pedicle was easily identified and allowed the needle to pass asymptomatically underneath the neurovascular structures behind the joint. The tactile response of the lamina of C2 provided important feedback regarding needle depth caudal to the LAA joint.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    颈源性头痛(CEH)是由上颈椎功能障碍和相关的结构和软组织异常引起的疾病,显著影响患者生活质量。为了获得更好的治疗效果,我们提出了一种新的超声引导的“三合一”方法加筋膜平面(IFP)阻滞治疗CEH。这种方法允许调节C2背根神经节(DRG),枕第三神经(TON),和C3内侧支一点穿刺。此外,它允许IFP块之间的上颈部和枕骨肌肉在同一扫描平面内。
    我们在我们的疼痛诊所评估了2021年7月至2022年12月诊断为CEH的患者。我们包括那些对保守治疗和单枕骨神经阻滞没有反应的人,因此,使用“三合一”方法加IFP阻滞接受神经阻滞或脉冲射频(PRF)。超声引导的C2DRG穿刺程序的准确性通过C臂透视和PRF的感觉测试得到证实。在1、3和6个月的电话随访期间,使用数字评定量表(NRS)评分评估这些干预措施的治疗效果。
    利用“三合一”方法,共有5例诊断为CEH的患者接受了神经阻滞加IFP阻滞,2例患者行PRF加IFP阻滞。采用超声引导C2DRG穿刺程序,通过透视和PRF的感觉测试确认了针尖的正确放置。值得注意的是,所有病例均未出现与该方法相关的任何并发症.随后的随访评估显示,所有患者的CEHNRS评分均有所改善。
    超声引导的“三合一”方法加IFP阻滞可能是治疗CEH的潜在有效方法。
    UNASSIGNED: Cervicogenic headache (CEH) is a condition resulting from upper cervical spine dysfunction and associated structural and soft tissue abnormalities, significantly impacting patients\' quality of life. To acquire better therapeutic results, we presented a novel ultrasound-guided \"three in one\" approach plus interfascial plane (IFP) blocks for the treatment of CEH. This approach allows for the modulation of C2 dorsal root ganglion (DRG), third occipital nerve (TON), and C3 medial branch with one-point puncture. Additionally, it allows for IFP blocks between the upper neck and occipital muscles within the same scanning plane.
    UNASSIGNED: We evaluated patients diagnosed with CEH from July 2021 to December 2022 in our pain clinic. We included those who did not respond to conservative treatment and single occipital nerve block, therefore received nerve block or pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) using the \"Three in One\" approach plus IFP blocks. The accuracy of the ultrasound-guided C2 DRG puncture procedures was confirmed through fluoroscopy with C-arm and the sensory testing of PRF. The therapeutic effect of these interventions was assessed using the numerical rating scale (NRS) scores during telephone follow-ups at 1, 3, and 6 months.
    UNASSIGNED: Utilizing the \"Three in One\" approach, a total of 5 patients diagnosed with CEH underwent nerve block plus IFP blocks, while 2 patients underwent PRF plus IFP blocks. Employing ultrasound-guided C2 DRG puncture procedures, the needle tip\'s correct placement was confirmed through both fluoroscopy and sensory testing of PRF. Notably, none of the cases experienced any complications associated with the approach. Subsequent follow-up assessments revealed an improvement in the NRS scores for CEH in all patients.
    UNASSIGNED: The ultrasound-guided \"Three in One\" approach plus IFP blocks may be a potential effective method for the treatment of CEH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    探讨C2背根神经节脉冲射频(PRF)联合星状神经节阻滞(SGB)治疗颈源性头痛(CEH)的疗效。
    我们回顾性分析了在2019年5月至2022年5月期间住院的90例CEH患者。所有患者根据实际使用的治疗方法分为三组(每组30例):超声引导下SGB,超声引导下C2背根神经节PRF治疗,超声引导下C2背根神经节PRF联合SGB治疗。患者疼痛强度,睡眠,通过统计分析他们的疼痛视觉模拟量表(VAS)来评估情绪变化,匹兹堡睡眠质量量表(PSQI)和治疗前后的麦吉尔疼痛问卷情感项目评分。
    后处理VAS,PSQI,所有患者的McGill评分均显著降低(P<0.05),超声引导下C2背根神经节PRF联合SGB3项评分均低于单纯超声引导下SGB和单纯超声引导下C2背根神经节PRF(P<0.05)。
    在CHE患者中使用超声引导的C2背根神经节PRF联合SGB可有效缓解疼痛并改善睡眠,值得在诊所复制。
    UNASSIGNED: To explore the therapeutic effect of C2 dorsal root ganglion pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) combined with stellate ganglion block (SGB) in patients with cervicogenic headache (CEH).
    UNASSIGNED: We retrospectively reviewed 90 patients diagnosed with CEH who were admitted to our hospital between May 2019 and May 2022. All patients were divided into three groups (n = 30 each) according to the actual treatment method used: ultrasound-guided SGB, ultrasound-guided C2 dorsal root ganglion PRF treatment, and ultrasound-guided C2 dorsal root ganglion PRF combined with SGB treatment. Patients\' pain intensity, sleep, and mood changes were assessed by statistically analyzing their pain visual analog scale (VAS), Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Inventory (PSQI), and short-form McGill Pain Questionnaire affective item scores before and after treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: The post-treatment VAS, PSQI, and McGill scores were significantly decreased in all patients (P < 0.05), and all three scores in ultrasound-guided C2 dorsal root ganglion PRF combined with SGB were lower than those in ultrasound-guided SGB alone and ultrasound-guided C2 dorsal root ganglion PRF alone (P < 0.05).
    UNASSIGNED: The use of ultrasound-guided C2 dorsal root ganglion PRF combined with SGB in patients with CHE is effective in alleviating pain and improving sleep, and deserves to be replicated in the clinic.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory disease involving multiple joints. The cervical spine is often affected, and cases involving atlantoaxial joint can lead to instability. Anterior atlantoaxial subluxation in RA patients can lead to posterior neck pain or occipital headache because of compression of the C2 ganglion or nerve. Here, we report the successful treatment of a RA patient with occipital radiating headache using pulsed radiofrequency therapy at the C2 dorsal root ganglion.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    OBJECTIVE: This article investigates the degree and duration of pain relief from cervicogenic headaches or occipital neuralgia following treatment with radiofrequency ablation of the C2 dorsal root ganglion and/or third occipital nerves. It also addresses the procedure\'s complication rate and patient\'s willingness to repeat the procedure if severe symptoms recur.
    METHODS: This is a single-center retrospective observational study of 40 patients with refractory cervicogenic headaches and or occipital neuralgia. Patients were all referred by a headache specialty clinic for evaluation for radiofrequency ablation of the C2 dorsal root ganglion and/or third occipital nerves. After treatment, patients were followed for a minimum of 6 months to a year. Patient demographics and the results of radiofrequency ablation were recorded on the same day, after 3-4 days, and at 6 months to 1 year following treatment.
    RESULTS: Thirty-five percent of patients reported 100% pain relief and 70% reported 80% or greater pain relief. The mean duration of improvement is 22.35 weeks. Complication rate was 12-13%. 92.5% of patients reported they would undergo the procedure again if severe symptoms returned.
    CONCLUSIONS: Radiofrequency ablation of the C2 dorsal root ganglion and/or third occipital nerve can provide many months of greater than 50% pain relief in the vast majority of recipients with an expected length of symptom improvement of 5-6 months.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号