OBJECTIVE: The current study focused on predicting future trends in obstetrics by examining obstetricians\' approaches to specific challenging vaginal delivery that require special experience, such as breech presentation, macrosomic fetus, twin pregnancy, and vacuum use, compared with their residency training experience.
METHODS: The cross-sectional study was conducted in two phases. The first phase was qualitative and the second phase was quantitative. The \"interview\" and \"survey\" techniques served as data collection tools. In total, 20 obstetricians participated in the interviews, and 400 obstetricians took part in the survey. Data from the interviews were analyzed using the Maxqda 2020 qualitative data analysis program, and survey data were analyzed using SPSS version 25.0.
RESULTS: Over the past 2 decades, there has been a gradual shift from vaginal deliveries to cesarean deliveries in cases involving breech presentation, macrosomic fetus, twin pregnancy, and vacuum use. While medicolegal concerns are undeniable, the prevalent belief among obstetricians that cesarean delivery is safer than vaginal delivery significantly influences this trend. Comparatively, young obstetricians often complete their residency training without acquiring sufficient knowledge and skills in vaginal delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: Young obstetricians currently lack adequate experience in managing vaginal deliveries for breech presentation, macrosomic fetus, twin pregnancy, and vacuum use. This experience is at risk of disappearing entirely within the next decade as senior obstetricians retire. Policymakers should take this into consideration when shaping future healthcare policies.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the success and complication rates of external cephalic version before and after the implementation of a simulator-based training program at a tertiary care university centre with a dedicated external cephalic version team.
METHODS: In this single-center intervention study, the success rate and the complication rates of external cephalic version in the two years before the implementation of a simulation-based training program for all specialists and residents, were compared with the two years following the event. T- student, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-square tests were used. All data were extracted from the hospital\'s electronic patient records.
RESULTS: A total of 96 external cephalic versions were performed in the 2 years before the training program, and 74 after the training program. The overall success rates were similar between the two groups: 44.8 % before training and 43.2 % after training (p = 0.824). No major complications occurred, and no emergency cesarean deliveries were performed in either period.
CONCLUSIONS: In a tertiary care university training center with a dedicated team in external cephalic version, a structured simulation-based training program did not impact the success rate or the complication rates of the procedure.

BACKGROUND: External cephalic version (ECV) is a medical procedure in which an extracorporeal manipulation is performed to render the breech presentation (BP) fetus in the cephalic position. The use of anesthesia to facilitate repositioning has been evaluated in various randomized clinical trials (RCTs), but its potential effectiveness remains controversial.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in 8 electronic databases. In the meta-analysis, a random effects model was used to calculate the pooled relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), and the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% CI, in order to systematically assess the effect of anesthesia on the success rates of ECV, vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery as well as other outcomes. Relevant subgroup analyses, publication bias test and sensitivity analyses were also conducted.
RESULTS: This review included 17 RCTs. Women who received anesthesia had a significantly higher incidence of successful ECV (RR: 1.37, 95% CIs: 1.19-1.58) and vaginal delivery (RR: 1.23, 95% CIs: 1.03-1.47), and a significantly lower incidence of cesarean delivery (RR: 0.69, 95% CIs: 0.53-0.91), compared with those who did not.
CONCLUSIONS: The administration of anesthesia not only significantly reduces maternal pain but also significantly increases the success rate of ECV in women with malpresentation at term, leading to a significant rise in the incidence of vaginal delivery. However, it may increase the incidence of maternal hypotension.
BACKGROUND: The protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO, registration CRD42022381552.

BACKGROUND: Over the last several decades, cesarean delivery has been recommended as the safest mode of delivery for breech presentations. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of planned vaginal births with planned cesarean births in breech presenting fetuses.
METHODS: This retrospective population-based cohort study utilized data from the United States\' Period Linked Birth-Infant Death Public Use Files from 2008 to 2017. All term singleton breech deliveries of a live baby without congenital anomalies were identified (n = 546,842) and divided into two cohorts: women who had a planned vaginal birth (n = 116,828), and women who had a planned cesarean section (n = 430,014). Multivariate logistic regression models, adjusted for maternal baseline characteristics, examined the associations between the planned delivery method and neonatal outcomes.
RESULTS: It was observed that 26.14 % of the planned vaginal birth cohort had a vaginal delivery. In adjusted analyses, undergoing a planned vaginal birth for breech delivery was associated with an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes including infant death, OR 1.32, 95 % CI 1.16-1.52, admission to NICU,1.23, 1.19-1.27, ventilation support at 〈 6 h of life, 1.47, 1.42-1.52, ventilation support at 〉 6 h of life, 1.19, 1.08-1.31, and Apgar score of ≤3 at 5 min, 2.27, 2.06-2.50.
CONCLUSIONS: In women carrying fetuses in breech presentation, having a planned vaginal birth had a low success rate and was associated with increased risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality. Women should be carefully counselled on the risks associated with breech vaginal delivery as well as the low success rate of vaginal delivery.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with breech presentation in planned community births in the United States, including outcomes associated with types of breech presentation (i.e., frank, complete, footling/kneeling).
METHODS: Secondary analysis of prospective cohort data from a national perinatal data registry (MANA Stats).
METHODS: Planned community birth (homes and birth centers), United States.
METHODS: Individuals with a term, singleton gestation (N = 71,943) planning community birth at labor onset.
METHODS: Descriptive statistics to calculate associations between types of breech presentation and maternal and neonatal outcomes.
METHODS: Maternal: intrapartum/postpartum transfer, hospitalization, cesarean, hemorrhage, severe perineal laceration, duration of labor stages and membrane rupture Neonatal: transfer, hospitalization, NICU admission, congenital anomalies, umbilical cord prolapse, birth injury, intrapartum/neonatal death.
RESULTS: One percent (n = 695) of individuals experienced breech birth (n = 401, 57.6% vaginally). Most fetuses presented frank breech (57%), with 19% complete, 18% footling/kneeling, and 5% unknown type of breech presentation. Among all breech labors, there were high rates of intrapartum transfer and cesarean birth compared to cephalic presentation (OR 9.0, 95% CI 7.7-10.4 and OR 18.6, 95% CI 15.9-21.7, respectively), with no substantive difference based on parity, planned site of birth, or level of care integration into the health system. For all types of breech presentations, there was increased risk for nearly all assessed neonatal outcomes including hospital transfer, NICU admission, birth injury, and umbilical cord prolapse. Breech presentation was also associated with increased risk of intrapartum/neonatal death (OR 8.5, 95% CI 4.4-16.3), even after congenital anomalies were excluded.
CONCLUSIONS: All types of breech presentations in community birth settings are associated with increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. These research findings contribute to informed decision-making and reinforce the need for breech training and research and an increase in accessible, high-quality care for planned vaginal breech birth in US hospitals.

OBJECTIVE: To study neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with routine maneuvers in breech vaginal delivery at term.
METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the multicenter PREMODA observational prospective study in France and Belgium. We included women with vaginal breech delivery, excluding those who underwent maneuvers to resolve a dystocic delivery. Maternal data and characteristics of labor, in addition to neonatal and maternal outcomes, were recorded. We defined two groups according to mode of delivery; breech vaginal delivery with or without routine maneuvers, and we compared the variables between the groups. To assess the factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, a multivariate logistic regression with adjustment for confounders was performed.
RESULTS: Of the 2502 women with planned vaginal deliveries, 1794 were delivered vaginally, 606 of whom were excluded from the study due to maneuvers performed for dystocia. A total of 25 other patients were excluded as a result of missing data. A total of 537 women were included in the routine maneuvers group and 626 women in the no maneuvers group. Adverse perinatal outcome was similar for the two groups (4.5% vs 5.0%, P = 0.65) and no neonatal deaths were reported. Third degree perineal tear and postpartum hemorrhage >1 L rates were comparable for the two groups. After adjustment, the factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes were primiparity and birth weight <2500 g.
CONCLUSIONS: Routine maneuvers were not associated with an increase in neonatal morbidity in our population.

BACKGROUND: An infant\'s presentation at delivery may be an early indicator of developmental differences. Non-vertex presentation (malpresentation) complicates delivery and often leads to caesarean section, which has been associated with neurodevelopmental delays, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, malpresentation could be an early sign of an existing developmental problem that is also an upstream factor from caesarean delivery. Little research has been done to investigate the association between malpresentation and ASD.
OBJECTIVE: We examine the association between malpresentation at delivery and ASD and whether this association differs by gestational age.
METHODS: We used data from the Study to Explore Early Development (SEED), a multi-site, case-control study of children with ASD compared to population controls. The foetal presentation was determined using medical records, birth records and maternal interviews. We defined malpresentation as a non-vertex presentation at delivery, then further categorised into breech and other malpresentation. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for the association between malpresentation and ASD.
RESULTS: We included 4047 SEED participants, 1873 children with ASD and 2174 controls. At delivery, most infants presented vertex (n = 3760, 92.9%). Malpresentation was associated with higher odds of ASD (aOR 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02, 1.68) after adjustment for maternal age, poverty level, hypertensive disorder and smoking. The association was similar for breech and other types of malpresentation (aOR 1.28, 95% CI 0.97, 1.70 and aOR 1.40, 95% CI 0.87, 2.26, respectively) and did not differ markedly by gestational age.
CONCLUSIONS: Malpresentation at delivery was modestly associated with ASD. Early monitoring of the neurodevelopment of children born with malpresentation could identify children with ASD sooner and enhance opportunities to provide support to optimise developmental outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Lack of opportunity for breech training and clinical experience reduced professional confidence and expertise in supporting vaginal breech birth.
BACKGROUND: OptiBreech collaborative care is a care pathway for breech presentation at term that aims to enable improve safety through person-centred care and improved training opportunities for maternity professionals, within dedicated clinics and intrapartum support. In feasibility work, barriers and facilitators to team implementation were observed by team members.
OBJECTIVE: This study sought to describe factors affecting optimal future implementation and safety of OptiBreech care.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff members at 13 OptiBreech trial sites (17 midwives and 4 obstetricians, n=21), via video conferencing software. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to identify factors impacting team implementation. Themes identified in the TDF were refined in reflexive discussion and grouped into key facilitators, key barriers, and dynamic factors (which span both barriers and facilitators). The interviews were then coded, analysed, and interpreted according to the refined framework.
RESULTS: The key facilitators were broadly categorised within skill development, beliefs about capabilities, and social support from the wider multidisciplinary team. Key barrier categories were resources, social obstacles, and fears about consequences. Dynamic factor categories were individual responsibility, training, and attending births.
CONCLUSIONS: While some factors affecting implementation were specific to the individuals and cultures of certain Trusts, recommendations emerged from analysis that are more widely applicable across multiple settings. These should be considered going forward for future service implementation, and in the next stage of OptiBreech clinical trials.

Introduction: In 3-6% of pregnancies, foetuses can be expected to be in a breech presentation near term. Consultation concerning further management of the pregnancy, including the option of an external cephalic version (ECV), is recommended by international guidelines (RCOG, ACOG, and DGGG). With regards to an ECV, there need to be two assumptions. Firstly, the procedure is safe, which has been shown adequately. Secondly, a vaginal birth after a successful ECV needs to prove to be non-inferior to the alternative of an elective caesarean section. The aim of this study is to assess the non-inferiority assumption. Methods: Overall, 142 singleton pregnancies were analysed that presented a foetus in a non-cephalic presentation and underwent an ECV near term between 2011 and 2020. The ECV was performed at 36 weeks of gestation for primiparous women and at 37/38 weeks of gestation for multiparous women. To assess neonatal outcome, the following parameters were recorded: arterial and venous umbilical cord blood pH, APGAR scores and admission to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). Data were analysed under the assumption that neonatal outcome does not differ between elective caesarean sections with or without an ECV in advance. Results: The success rate of an ECV was 56.3% (80/142). In the case of a successful ECV, there was a 77.5% (62/80) chance for a vaginal delivery. The mean arterial pH for neonates born vaginally after successful ECV was 7.262 (SD 0.089), compared to 7.316 (SD 0.051) for those born via elective caesarean section (p < 0.001). APGAR scores at 1, 5, and 10 min were similar between the groups, with a slightly higher proportion of neonates scoring below the median in the caesarean section group. Specifically, 13.7% (7/51) at 1 min, 15.7% (8/51) at 5 min, and 9.8% (5/51) at 10 min in the caesarean section group were below the median, compared to 4.92% (3/61), 4.92% (3/61), and 3.28% (2/61) in the vaginal birth group. NICU admission rates were 3.28% for vaginal births and 3.92% for elective caesarean sections (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Women with a successful ECV can expect a neonatal birth outcome after a vaginal birth that is non-inferior to an alternative elective caesarean section.

OBJECTIVE: The aims of this study were to assess whether a regional simulation-based training course in external cephalic version (ECV) would lead to the adoption of this technique in hospitals where it was not previously practiced, and to improve success rates in those already performing it.
METHODS: This was an intervention study where two specialists in obstetrics and gynecology from 10 Portuguese public maternity hospitals attended a structured simulation-based training in ECV. Hospitals were categorized based on whether ECV was conducted prior to the training program, and on their annual number of deliveries. Main outcomes were the number of ECVs performed in the 2 years before and after the course, and their success rates.
RESULTS: Implementation of ECV was achieved in four additional hospitals during the 2 years following the course. Among the three hospitals already performing ECV and able to report their data, no significant differences in success rates were observed in the 2 years following the course (45.6% vs. 47.9%, P = 0.797). After a successful ECV, 77.7% of women had a vaginal delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: A regional simulation-based training course in ECV led to an increase in the number of hospitals implementing the technique in the subsequent 2 years, but it did not impact the success rates in centers where it was already performed. This study highlights the potential of simulation-based courses in ECV, as well as the need to improve patients´ access to the technique and to centralize ECV services at a regional level.