Breakthrough Infections

突破性感染
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    SARS-CoV-2大流行加剧了人们对免疫保护的担忧,特别是对于具有先天免疫错误(IEI)的个人。虽然COVID-19疫苗在健康个体中引发强烈的免疫反应,它们在IEI患者中的有效性仍不清楚,特别是针对新的病毒变体和疫苗制剂。这种不确定性导致了焦虑,长时间的自我隔离,IEI患者反复接种,但获益不确定。尽管接种疫苗有一定程度的免疫反应,IEI个体保护性免疫的定义仍然未知.鉴于他们对重症COVID-19的易感性,免疫球蛋白替代疗法(IgRT)和单克隆抗体等策略已被用于提供被动免疫,以及针对当前和新兴变体的保护。这篇综述探讨了COVID-19疫苗和基于抗体的疗法在IEI患者中的疗效,它们识别病毒变体的能力,以及使用IEI持续保护人们所需的必要进展。
    The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has heightened concerns about immunological protection, especially for individuals with inborn errors of immunity (IEI). While COVID-19 vaccines elicit strong immune responses in healthy individuals, their effectiveness in IEI patients remains unclear, particularly against new viral variants and vaccine formulations. This uncertainty has led to anxiety, prolonged self-isolation, and repeated vaccinations with uncertain benefits among IEI patients. Despite some level of immune response from vaccination, the definition of protective immunity in IEI individuals is still unknown. Given their susceptibility to severe COVID-19, strategies such as immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT) and monoclonal antibodies have been employed to provide passive immunity, and protection against both current and emerging variants. This review examines the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines and antibody-based therapies in IEI patients, their capacity to recognize viral variants, and the necessary advances required for the ongoing protection of people with IEIs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    疫苗突破性SARS-CoV-2感染是常见的,并引起临床和公共卫生关注。然而,对因这些感染而住院的患者的免疫学特征知之甚少。我们旨在调查和比较接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的重症COVID-19住院患者的免疫细胞亚群和诱导的免疫反应。
    一项针对成年人(≥18岁)的巢式病例对照研究符合资格,这些成年人在2021年1月7日至2022年2月1日期间接受了至少两剂mRNA-COVID-19疫苗并因SARS-CoV-2突破性感染和严重COVID-19住院。鉴定年龄和性别匹配的未接种对照。使用定制设计的10色流式细胞术预制的冻干抗体组(DuraClone,贝克曼·库尔特(BC),Brea,加州)。TruCulture(无数RBM,奥斯汀,美国)用于评估全血中诱导的免疫反应,揭示不同的关键信号通路作为免疫功能的代理。所有样品均在入院后48小时内获得。
    总共,纳入20例严重COVID-19和突破性SARS-CoV-2感染的住院患者,10名接种疫苗和10名未接种疫苗的患者。接种疫苗的患者CD19B细胞浓度较低(p=0.035),幼稚CD4T细胞(p=0.015),γδ1T细胞比例较高(p=0.019),和更高的未刺激的免疫细胞释放IL-10(p=0.015)。
    我们观察到由于严重的COVID-19而住院的接种疫苗和未接种疫苗的患者之间的免疫学差异,这表明接种疫苗的患者的B细胞浓度较低,较低浓度的CD4初始T细胞,偏斜的伽马-δV1/V2比,入院时IL-10反应夸张。这些结果可能表明与SARS-CoV-2突破性感染有关的免疫反应欠佳,在接种疫苗的成年人中导致严重的COVID-19。然而,样本量很小,需要进一步的研究来证实这些结果。
    UNASSIGNED: Vaccine breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infections are common and of clinical and public health concern. However, little is known about the immunological characteristics of patients hospitalized due to these infections. We aimed to investigate and compare immune cell subpopulations and induced immune responses in vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19.
    UNASSIGNED: A nested case-control study on adults (≥ 18 years) who received at least two doses of a mRNA-COVID-19 vaccine and were hospitalized with SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections and severe COVID-19 between January 7, 2021, and February 1, 2022, were eligible for inclusion. Age- and sex-matched non-vaccinated controls were identified. Immunophenotyping was performed using a custom-designed 10-color flow cytometry prefabricated freeze-dried antibody panel (DuraClone, Beckman Coulter (BC), Brea, Calif). TruCulture (Myriad RBM, Austin, USA) was used to assess induced immune response in whole blood, revealing different critical signaling pathways as a proxy for immune function. All samples were obtained within 48 hours of admission.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 20 hospitalized patients with severe COVID-19 and a breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection were included, ten vaccinated and ten non-vaccinated patients. Vaccinated patients had lower concentrations of CD19 B cells (p = 0.035), naïve CD4 T cells (p = 0.015), a higher proportion of γδ1 T cells (p = 0.019), and higher unstimulated immune cell release of IL-10 (p = 0.015).
    UNASSIGNED: We observed immunological differences between vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients hospitalized due to severe COVID-19 that indicate that vaccinated patients had lower B cell concentrations, lower concentrations of CD4 naïve T cells, a skewed gamma-delta V1/V2 ratio, and an exaggerated IL-10 response at admission. These results could indicate a suboptimal immune response involved in SARS-CoV-2 breakthrough infections that cause severe COVID-19 in vaccinated adults. However, the sample size was small, and further research is needed to confirm these results.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项纵向前瞻性对照多中心研究旨在监测COVID-19疫苗接种后突破性感染(BTI)引起的三种暴露所产生的免疫力,考虑到预先存在的对普通冠状病毒(CoV)的细胞介导免疫力,这可能会影响细胞对SARS-CoV-2的反应性。在完全接种疫苗的(F)个体中确定了抗SARS-CoV-2-尖峰IgG抗体(抗S-IgG)和针对尖峰蛋白(S)-和核衣壳蛋白(N)蛋白的细胞反应性PCR确认感染后1至24周,与部分接种疫苗(PBTI)和未接种疫苗(U)相比,经历了BTI(FBTI)或加强疫苗接种(FBooster)。与U相比,在F+BTI中发现了高亲和力抗S-IgG,后者表现出增加的持久促炎细胞因子对S-刺激。CoV在U中与较高的细胞反应性相关,而在F中没有发现相关性。该研究表明,在FBTI中,通过三种暴露可诱导显着的S特异性细胞反应,从而建立基本免疫。只有U似乎受益于预先存在的CoV免疫,但与在BTI后从增强的体液和细胞免疫免疫中免疫受益的F+BTI相比,显示了炎性免疫应答。这项研究表明,具有来自COVID-19疫苗接种和BTI的混合免疫的个体获得了稳定的体液和细胞免疫应答,并维持了至少6个月。我们的发现证实了卫生当局通过三种S蛋白暴露来建立基本免疫力的建议。
    This longitudinal prospective controlled multicenter study aimed to monitor immunity generated by three exposures caused by breakthrough infections (BTI) after COVID-19-vaccination considering pre-existing cell-mediated immunity to common-corona-viruses (CoV) which may impact cellular reactivity against SARS-CoV-2. Anti-SARS-CoV-2-spike-IgG antibodies (anti-S-IgG) and cellular reactivity against Spike-(S)- and nucleocapsid-(N)-proteins were determined in fully-vaccinated (F) individuals who either experienced BTI (F+BTI) or had booster vaccination (F+Booster) compared to partially vaccinated (P+BTI) and unvaccinated (U) from 1 to 24 weeks post PCR-confirmed infection. High avidity anti-S-IgG were found in F+BTI compared to U, the latter exhibiting increased long-lasting pro-inflammatory cytokines to S-stimulation. CoV was associated with higher cellular reactivity in U, whereas no association was seen in F. The study illustrates the induction of significant S-specific cellular responses in F+BTI building-up basic immunity by three exposures. Only U seem to benefit from pre-existing CoV immunity but demonstrated inflammatory immune responses compared to F+BTI who immunologically benefit from enhanced humoral and cellular immunity after BTI. This study demonstrates that individuals with hybrid immunity from COVID-19-vaccination and BTI acquire a stable humoral and cellular immune response that is maintained for at least 6 months. Our findings corroborate recommendations by health authorities to build on basic immunity by three S-protein exposures.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:截至2024年,疫苗接种仍然是对抗COVID-19的主要缓解措施,但关于艾滋病毒感染者(PLWH)受到疫苗保护的程度是否低于无艾滋病毒感染者(PLWoH),存在矛盾的结果。在这项研究中,我们比较了PLWH和PLWoH完全接种疫苗后SARS-CoV-2感染和COVID-19住院的风险。
    方法:我们链接了来自疫苗接种注册的数据,COVID-19监测系统和来自意大利四个地区的医疗保健/药理登记处。我们确定了PLWH完全接种疫苗(主要周期完成后14天),并在疫苗施用周时将其与PLWoH以1:4的比例进行匹配。年龄,性别,居住地区和合并症。随访于2021年1月24日开始,最长持续234天。我们使用Kaplan-Meier估计量来计算两组的感染和COVID-19住院的累积发生率,我们以PLWoH为参照组,使用风险差异和比率比较了风险.
    结果:我们匹配了42,771PLWH和171,084PLWoH。两组的突破性感染总体风险相似,比率(RR)为1.10(95%置信区间(CI):0.80-1.53)。在研究期结束时,PLWH组的组间绝对差异为每10,000人天8.28个事件(95CI:-18.43-40.29)。PLWH患者COVID-19住院风险无显著增加(RR:1.90;95CI:0.93-3.32),相当于每10,000人6.73次住院(95CI:-0.57至14.87/10,000)。
    结论:我们的研究结果表明,在一次mRNA疫苗接种后,PLWH突破性SARS-CoV-2感染或COVID-19住院的风险并未增加。
    BACKGROUND: As of 2024, vaccination remains the main mitigation measure against COVID-19, but there are contradictory results on whether people living with HIV (PLWH) are less protected by vaccines than people living without HIV (PLWoH). In this study we compared the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 hospitalisation following full vaccination in PLWH and PLWoH.
    METHODS: We linked data from the vaccination registry, the COVID-19 surveillance system and from healthcare/pharmacological registries in four Italian regions. We identified PLWH fully vaccinated (14 days post completion of the primary cycle) and matched them at a ratio of 1:4 with PLWoH by week of vaccine administration, age, sex, region of residence and comorbidities. Follow-up started on January 24, 2021, and lasted for a maximum of 234 days. We used the Kaplan-Meier estimator to calculate the cumulative incidence of infection and COVID-19 hospitalisation in both groups, and we compared risks using risk differences and ratios taking PLWoH as the reference group.
    RESULTS: We matched 42,771 PLWH with 171,084 PLWoH. The overall risk of breakthrough infection was similar in both groups with a rate ratio (RR) of 1.10 (95% confidence interval (CI):0.80-1.53). The absolute difference between groups at the end of the study period was 8.28 events per 10,000 person-days in the PLWH group (95%CI:-18.43-40.29). There was a non-significant increase the risk of COVID-19 hospitalisation among PLWH (RR:1.90; 95%CI:0.93-3.32) which corresponds to 6.73 hospitalisations per 10,000 individuals (95%CI: -0.57 to 14.87 per 10,000).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest PLWH were not at increased risk of breakthrough SARS-CoV-2 infection or COVID-19 hospitalisation following a primary cycle of mRNA vaccination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    ZF2001疫苗在预防2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)方面表现出很高的疗效。然而,接种疫苗者突破性感染的临床特征和COVID-19患者不良结局的危险因素仍不清楚.我们在中南大学湘雅医院进行了一项回顾性单中心队列研究,包括2022年12月5日至2023年1月31日期间210名完全接种COVID-19的住院患者。临床特征数据,实验室发现,疾病严重程度,治疗,收集并分析预后。我们的发现显示,COVID-19住院患者在发病时仍然会出现常见症状,但是大多数实验室发现都在正常范围内,除了白细胞计数(WBC),淋巴细胞计数,和乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平。在标准治疗之后,95.7%的患者出院。我们确定了七个变量与较高的不良结局风险显着相关,包括65岁以上白细胞计数升高,淋巴细胞计数减少,血尿素氮(BUN)水平较高,LDH,肌钙蛋白,D-二聚体,和降钙素原.这项研究支持ZF2001疫苗对COVID-19患者的实质性临床益处。此外,65岁以上,白细胞计数升高,淋巴细胞计数减少,和更高的血尿素氮水平,LDH,D-二聚体,和降钙素原可作为完全接种COVID-19的住院患者疾病进展的预测因子。
    The ZF2001 vaccine has demonstrated high efficacy in preventing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, the clinical characteristics of breakthrough infections in vaccinated individuals and the risk factors for adverse outcomes in COVID-19 patients remain unclear. We conducted a retrospective single-center cohort study at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, including 210 fully vaccinated COVID-19 inpatients from December 5, 2022, to January 31, 2023. Data on clinical characteristics, laboratory findings, disease severity, treatment, and prognosis were collected and analyzed. Our findings revealed that COVID-19 inpatients still experienced common symptoms at the onset of illness, but most laboratory findings were within the normal range, except for white blood cell count (WBC), lymphocyte count, and lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels. Following standard treatment, 95.7% of patients were discharged from the hospital. We identified seven variables significantly associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes, including age over 65, elevated WBC count, reduced lymphocyte count, higher levels of blood urea nitrogen (BUN), LDH, troponin, D-dimer, and procalcitonin. This study supports the substantial clinical benefits of the ZF2001 vaccine for COVID-19 patients. Additionally, age over 65, elevated WBC count, reduced lymphocyte count, and higher blood levels of BUN, LDH, D-dimer, and procalcitonin may be used as predictive factors for disease progression in fully vaccinated COVID-19 inpatients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:为了告知未来的应对计划,我们旨在评估SARS-CoV-2感染和/或疫苗诱导的免疫趋势,包括突破性感染,在(子)群体中,关注变化(VOC)时代荷兰人口的职业和地区。
    方法:在这个基于人群的前瞻性队列中,随机选择的1-92岁(2020年初招募)的参与者(n=9985)在2021/2022年的六个时间点捐赠了家庭收集的手指血液样本,覆盖了以Alpha为主的波浪,Delta,和多个Omicron(子)变体。针对Spike-S1和核蛋白的IgG抗体评估与疫苗接种和测试数据相结合,以评估感染诱导的(inf)和总(感染和疫苗接种诱导的)血清阳性率。
    结果:全国血清阳性率从自Alpha以来的12%(95%CI11-13)适度上升至Delta中的26%(95%CI24-28),而总血清阳性率迅速上升至87%(95%CI85-88),特别是在老年人和有合并症的人群中(即,弱势群体)。有趣的是,感染率最高的是受教育程度低/中等的老年人,非西方,接触职业的人,青少年和年轻人,在疫苗接种覆盖率低的地区。在Omicron出现之后,在2022年后期,血清阳性率急剧上升至62%(95%CI59-65),并进一步上升至86%(95%CI83-90),大多数组之间频繁的突破性感染和血清阳性率差异降低。而>90%<60岁的人至少感染过一次,30%的接种疫苗的脆弱个体仍未获得杂种免疫。
    结论:在全球范围内评估控制措施和未来应对计划时,需要特别注意在大流行急性期被不成比例地感染的人群。此外,正在进行的有针对性的疫苗接种工作和对弱势群体的(血清)监测可能仍然很重要。
    BACKGROUND: To inform future response planning we aimed to assess SARS-CoV-2 trends in infection- and/or vaccine-induced immunity, including breakthrough infections, among (sub)groups, professions and regions in the Dutch population during the Variant of Concern (VOC)-era.
    METHODS: In this prospective population-based cohort, randomly selected participants (n = 9985) aged 1-92 years (recruited early-2020) donated home-collected fingerstick-blood samples at six timepoints in 2021/2022, covering waves dominated by Alpha, Delta, and multiple Omicron (sub-)variants. IgG antibody assessment against Spike-S1 and Nucleoprotein was combined with vaccination- and testing data to estimate infection-induced (inf) and total (infection- and vaccination-induced) seroprevalence.
    RESULTS: Nationwide inf-seroprevalence rose modestly from 12% (95% CI 11-13) since Alpha to 26% (95% CI 24-28) amidst Delta, while total seroprevalence increased rapidly to 87% (95% CI 85-88), particularly in elderly and those with comorbidities (i.e., vulnerable groups). Interestingly, highest infection rates were noticeable among low/middle educated elderly, non-Western, those in contact professions, adolescents and young adults, and in low-vaccination coverage regions. Following Omicron emergence, inf-seroprevalence elevated sharply to 62% (95% CI 59-65) and further to 86% (95% CI 83-90) in late-2022, with frequent breakthrough infections and decreasing seroprevalence dissimilarities between most groups. Whereas > 90% of < 60-year-olds had been infected at least once, 30% of vaccinated vulnerable individuals had still not acquired hybrid immunity.
    CONCLUSIONS: Groups identified to have been infected disproportionally during the acute phase of the pandemic require specific attention in evaluation of control measures and future response planning worldwide. Furthermore, ongoing tailored vaccination efforts and (sero-)monitoring of vulnerable groups may remain important.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    沃州爆发了51例麻疹疫情,瑞士,2024年1月至3月。疫情是由进口病例引发的,37例(72.5%)随后的病例是以前接种过疫苗的个体。流行病学调查显示,接种疫苗的麻疹病例具有症状性和传染性。在高度接种疫苗的人群中,重要的是要提高医疗保健专业人员的意识,以在宣布爆发时怀疑和测试麻疹病毒,无论患者的疫苗接种状况如何。
    A measles outbreak with 51 cases occurred in the canton of Vaud, Switzerland, between January and March 2024. The outbreak was triggered by an imported case, and 37 (72.5%) subsequent cases were previously vaccinated individuals. Epidemiological investigations showed that vaccinated measles cases were symptomatic and infectious. In a highly vaccinated population, it is important to raise awareness among healthcare professionals to suspect and test for measles virus when an outbreak is declared, irrespective of the vaccination status of the patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究追踪了99名受试者在两年内接种了辉瑞/BioNTechCOVID-19疫苗,特别关注观察的最后一年(360天到720天)。用Diasorin的SARS-CoV-2三聚体SpikeIgG评估对疫苗接种的反应。使用雅培的SARS-CoV-2核衣壳IgG免疫测定法进行SARS-CoV-2感染的筛查。还分析了来自问卷的数据。第一次接种疫苗两年后,100%的受试者抗刺性SARS-CoV-2IgG阳性,中位抗体水平仍然很高(3600BAU/mL),去年下降不明显。同时,注意到抗核衣壳SARS-CoV-2IgG的血清阳性大幅增加,达到33%。抗N血清阳性与报告的COVID-19之间没有统计学上的显着一致性。在年龄较大的疫苗接种者中可以看到更高的抗刺药浓度和更低的COVID-19发病率。注意到,仅在第360天和第720天之间加强的受试者显示出抗尖峰IgG浓度的增加。在第360天,在第二年未感染的参与者中注意到较高的抗体浓度(中位数7440BAU/mL)。疫苗接种,包括助推器管理部门,自然,甚至无法识别,初次接种疫苗两年后,与SARS-CoV-2的接触交织在一起,导致高抗尖峰抗体浓度。
    This study follows 99 subjects vaccinated with Pfizer/BioNTech COVID-19 vaccines over two years, with particular focus on the last year of observation (between days 360 and 720). The response to the vaccination was assessed with Diasorin\'s SARS-CoV-2 TrimericSpike IgG. Screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection was performed with Abbott\'s SARS-CoV-2 Nucleocapsid IgG immunoassay. Data from questionnaires were also analyzed. Two years after the first vaccine dose administration, 100% of the subjects were positive for anti-spike SARS-CoV-2 IgG and the median antibody level was still high (3600 BAU/mL), dropping insignificantly over the last year. Simultaneously, a substantial increase in seropositivity in anti-nucleocapsid SARS-CoV-2 IgG was noted, reaching 33%. There was no statistically significant agreement between anti-N seropositivity and reported COVID-19. Higher anti-spike concentrations and lower COVID-19 incidence was seen in the older vaccinees. It was noted that only subjects boosted between days 360 and 720 showed an increase in anti-spike IgG concentrations. The higher antibody concentrations (median 7440 BAU/mL) on day 360 were noted in participants not infected over the following year. Vaccination, including booster administrations, and natural, even unrecognized, contact with SARS-CoV-2 entwined two years after the primary vaccination, leading to high anti-spike antibody concentrations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    HIV感染者(PLWH)可能对疫苗表现出受损的免疫反应。越来越多的证据表明PLWH,特别是那些接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的人,对COVID-19疫苗产生强烈的抗体反应,但是很少有研究检查对疫苗接种的细胞免疫反应。这里,我们使用激活诱导标记(AIM)测定法来量化接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的50例PLWH中两剂和三剂COVID-19疫苗产生的SARS-CoV-2尖峰特异性CD4+和CD8+T细胞,与87名没有艾滋病毒的对照参与者相比。在PLWH的子集中,还在疫苗后突破感染和/或接受第四疫苗剂量后评估T细胞应答。所有参与者在第三次接种疫苗后至少一个月仍未感染SARS-CoV-2。SARS-CoV-2感染通过血清转化为核衣壳(N)抗原来确定,在第三次疫苗剂量后,21PLWH和38名对照参与者中发生了这种情况。多变量回归分析用于调查社会人口统计学,与健康和疫苗相关的变量,疫苗诱导的T细胞反应,和突破性感染风险。我们观察到第三疫苗剂量提高了尖峰特异性CD4+和CD8+T细胞频率显著高于第二剂量后测量的频率(所有p<0.0001)。第二次给药后,PLWH和对照之间的T细胞频率中位数没有差异(p>0.1),但CD8+T细胞反应适度降低PLWH后第三剂量(p=0.02),在调整社会人口统计学后,这一观察仍然很重要,健康和疫苗相关变量(p=0.045)。在经历了突破性感染的PLWH中,中位T细胞频率增加甚至高于三次疫苗剂量后观察到的水平(p<0.03),和CD8+T细胞反应在该组中保持较高,甚至在第四次疫苗剂量后(p=0.03)。在多变量分析中,与突破性感染风险增加相关的唯一因素是年龄较小,这与Omicron变体最初出现后在加拿大年轻人中观察到的SARS-CoV-2血清阳性迅速增加是一致的。这些结果表明,接受抗逆转录病毒治疗的PLWH对COVID-19疫苗产生强烈的T细胞反应,这种反应可以通过加强剂量或突破性感染来增强。
    People living with HIV (PLWH) can exhibit impaired immune responses to vaccines. Accumulating evidence indicates that PLWH, particularly those receiving antiretroviral therapy, mount strong antibody responses to COVID-19 vaccines, but fewer studies have examined cellular immune responses to the vaccinations. Here, we used an activation-induced marker (AIM) assay to quantify SARS-CoV-2 spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cells generated by two and three doses of COVID-19 vaccines in 50 PLWH receiving antiretroviral therapy, compared to 87 control participants without HIV. In a subset of PLWH, T-cell responses were also assessed after post-vaccine breakthrough infections and/or receipt of a fourth vaccine dose. All participants remained SARS-CoV-2 infection-naive until at least one month after their third vaccine dose. SARS-CoV-2 infection was determined by seroconversion to a Nucleocapsid (N) antigen, which occurred in 21 PLWH and 38 control participants after the third vaccine dose. Multivariable regression analyses were used to investigate the relationships between sociodemographic, health- and vaccine-related variables, vaccine-induced T-cell responses, and breakthrough infection risk. We observed that a third vaccine dose boosted spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell frequencies significantly above those measured after the second dose (all p < 0.0001). Median T-cell frequencies did not differ between PLWH and controls after the second dose (p > 0.1), but CD8+ T-cell responses were modestly lower in PLWH after the third dose (p = 0.02), an observation that remained significant after adjusting for sociodemographic, health- and vaccine-related variables (p = 0.045). In PLWH who experienced a breakthrough infection, median T-cell frequencies increased even higher than those observed after three vaccine doses (p < 0.03), and CD8+ T-cell responses in this group remained higher even after a fourth vaccine dose (p = 0.03). In multivariable analyses, the only factor associated with an increased breakthrough infection risk was younger age, which is consistent with the rapid increase in SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity that was seen among younger adults in Canada after the initial appearance of the Omicron variant. These results indicate that PLWH receiving antiretroviral therapy mount strong T-cell responses to COVID-19 vaccines that can be enhanced by booster doses or breakthrough infection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号