Brachial Plexus Neuropathies

臂丛神经病变
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对比增强磁共振神经成像(CE-MRN)有望通过增强神经可视化并揭示各种病变的其他成像特征来诊断臂丛神经病变。本研究旨在验证CE-MRN在不同患者队列中改善臂丛神经(BP)成像的疗效。七十一科目,包括19名志愿者和52名血压压迫/截留患者,损伤,和肿瘤,同时接受CE-MRN和普通MRN。两名放射科医生评估了神经的可见度,与读者之间的协议进行了评估。定量参数,如信号强度(SI),对比噪声比(CNR),测量C7神经的对比度(CR)。在每个患者组中比较了CE-MRN和普通MRN之间的定性评分和定量指标。患者分类遵循神经病变评分报告和数据系统(NS-RADS),总结每种臂丛神经病变类型的其他影像学特征。读者之间对质量评估的一致意见很强。CE-MRN显着增强了所有队列的BP可视化和神经组织对比,特别是志愿者和受伤患者。它还揭示了其他成像特征,例如神经节中的低信号,压迫的神经部位,和肿瘤增强。CE-MRN有效缓解肌肉水肿和血管污染,能够对BP损伤进行精确分类。总的来说,CE-MRN始终增强BP可视化,并为准确诊断提供有价值的成像特征。
    Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance neurography (CE-MRN) holds promise for diagnosing brachial plexopathy by enhancing nerve visualization and revealing additional imaging features in various lesions. This study aims to validate CE-MRN\'s efficacy in improving brachial plexus (BP) imaging across different patient cohorts. Seventy-one subjects, including 19 volunteers and 52 patients with BP compression/entrapment, injury, and neoplasms, underwent both CE-MRN and plain MRN. Two radiologists assessed nerve visibility, with inter-reader agreement evaluated. Quantitative parameters such as signal intensity (SI), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and contrast ratio (CR) of the C7 nerve were measured. Both qualitative scoring and quantitative metrics were compared between CE-MRN and plain MRN within each patient group. Patient classification followed the Neuropathy Score Reporting and Data System (NS-RADS), summarizing additional imaging features for each brachial plexopathy type. Inter-reader agreement for qualitative assessment was strong. CE-MRN significantly enhanced BP visualization and nerve-tissue contrast across all cohorts, particularly in volunteers and patients with injuries. It also uncovered additional imaging features such as hypointense signals in ganglia, compressed nerve sites, and neoplastic enhancements. CE-MRN effectively mitigated muscle edema and vascular contamination, enabling precise classification of BP injuries. Overall, CE-MRN consistently enhances BP visualization and provides valuable imaging features for accurate diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    神经转移手术利用完整肌肉群的冗余和协同神经支配来恢复运动功能。这是通过将功能性神经或束转移到目标区域附近的受损神经来实现的,从而减少了神经支配的距离和时间。这些技术包括近端和远端神经转移,根据具体伤害定制。成功的神经转移取决于准确的诊断,创新的手术方法,和供体神经的明智选择,以最大限度地恢复功能。这项研究探讨了神经转移策略及其与其他程序的整合,强调它们在提高臂丛神经损伤治疗结果方面的重要性。
    Nerve transfer surgery utilizes the redundant and synergistic innervation of intact muscle groups to rehabilitate motor function. This is achieved by transferring functional nerves or fascicles to damaged nerves near the target area, thereby reducing the reinnervation distance and time. The techniques encompass both proximal and distal nerve transfers, customized according to the specific injury. Successful nerve transfer hinges on accurate diagnosis, innovative surgical approaches, and the judicious choice of donor nerves to maximize functional restoration. This study explores nerve transfer strategies and their integration with other procedures, emphasizing their importance in enhancing outcomes in brachial plexus injury management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:调查重症监护病房(ICU)急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)俯卧位成人患者上肢周围神经损伤(PNI)的发生率。
    方法:本系统综述采用荟萃分析,遵循流行病学观察性研究(MOOSE)报告指南的系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)和荟萃分析的首选报告项目。包括PubMed在内的四个电子数据库,护理和相关健康文献累积指数(CINAHL),科克伦图书馆,和EMBASE从开始到2024年1月进行了搜索。根据JoannaBriggs研究所关键评估工具评估纳入研究的质量。进行了比例荟萃分析,以检查需要俯卧位的患者中上肢PNI的综合患病率。
    结果:共8项研究(511名患者)纳入定量分析。所有研究在方法学质量上都有低或中等偏倚风险。上肢PNI患者的总体比例为13%(95CI:5%至29%),具有较大的研究间异质性(I2=84.6%,P<0.001)。在4项研究中描述了尺神经病和臂丛神经病变。
    结论:在COVID-19大流行期间,俯卧定位已被广泛使用。ICU团队之间的不同方法和未经培训的工作人员的选择性报告可能是解释研究之间巨大差异的一个因素,以及本荟萃分析中发现的13%的上肢PNI患者比例。因此,在从ICU出院后和随后的随访评估中强调患者评估的重要性是至关重要的.
    结论:专业培训对于确保安全的俯卧位至关重要,仔细考虑手臂和头部的放置,以减轻潜在的神经损伤。因此,医疗保健协议应纳入预防策略,由专家多学科团队进行的患者评估。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate the prevalence of upper limb peripheral nerve injuries (PNI) in adult patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) undergoing prone positioning.
    METHODS: This systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (MOOSE) reporting guidelines. Four electronic databases including PubMed, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), The Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched from inception to January 2024. The quality of the included studies was evaluated according to the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools. A proportion meta-analysis was conducted to examine the combined prevalence of upper limb PNI among patients requiring prone positioning.
    RESULTS: A total of 8 studies (511 patients) were pooled in the quantitative analysis. All studies had a low or moderate risk of bias in methodological quality. The overall proportion of patients with upper limb PNI was 13% (95%CI: 5% to 29%), with large between-study heterogeneity (I2 = 84.6%, P<0.001). Both ulnar neuropathy and brachial plexopathy were described in 4 studies.
    CONCLUSIONS: During the COVID-19 pandemic, prone positioning has been used extensively. Different approaches among ICU teams and selective reporting by untrained staff may be a factor in interpreting the large variability between studies and the 13% proportion of patients with upper limb PNI found in the present meta-analysis. Therefore, it is paramount to stress the importance of patient assessment both after discharge from the ICU and during subsequent follow-up evaluations.
    CONCLUSIONS: Specialized training is essential to ensure safe prone positioning, with careful consideration given to arms and head placement to mitigate potential nerve injuries. Therefore, healthcare protocols should incorporate preventive strategies, with patient assessments conducted by expert multidisciplinary teams.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:外伤性周围神经损伤,据报道,每年的发病率约为每10万人中13-23人,是一种严重的临床疾病,通常会导致严重的功能障碍和永久性残疾。尽管神经转移在臂丛神经损伤的治疗中越来越受欢迎,即使使用全神经根转移也无法获得令人满意的结果,尤其是严重受伤后。为了克服这个问题,我们假设,干细胞联合神经转移手术的应用可能是一种可行的替代治疗方法,而这些治疗不能带来足够的改善.同样,一些初步研究表明,脂肪干细胞联合去细胞同种异体神经移植在臂丛神经损伤的修复中提供了有希望的结果。这项研究的目的是评估在大鼠臂丛神经损伤模型中结合脂肪干细胞与神经转移程序的功效。
    方法:20只雌性Wistar大鼠,体重300~350g,8~10周龄,随机分为神经移植组(NT组)和神经移植联合脂肪干细胞组(NT和ASC组)。用微型镊子从脊髓中轻轻撕掉C5-C6根,建立臂丛神经损伤模型。在有或没有接种的同种异体脂肪组织来源的干细胞的情况下进行从尺神经到肌皮神经的神经转移(Oberlin程序)。用23号针将脂肪组织来源的干细胞以2×106个细胞的比例局部注射到神经转移区的表面。应用免疫组织化学(S100和PGP9.5抗体)和电生理数据评价术后12周神经修复的效果。
    结果:NT组的平均潜伏期明显更长(2.0±0.0ms,95%CI:1.96-2.06)比NT和ASC组(1.7±0.0ms,95%CI:1.7-1.7)(p<.001)。NT组的平均峰值较高(1.7±0.0mV,95%CI:1.7-1.7)比NT和ASC组(1.7±0.3mV,95%CI:1.6-1.9),无显著差异(p=.61)。尽管与NT组相比,在NT和ASC组中观察到更高的S100和PGP9.5阳性区域,差异无统计学意义(分别为p=.26和.08).
    结论:对大鼠进行的这项研究提供了初步证据,表明脂肪干细胞可能对臂丛神经损伤的神经转移具有积极作用。需要更大样本量和更长随访期的进一步研究来证实这些发现。
    BACKGROUND: Traumatic peripheral nerve injury, with an annual incidence reported to be approximately 13-23 per 100,000 people, is a serious clinical condition that can often lead to significant functional impairment and permanent disability. Although nerve transfer has become increasingly popular in the treatment of brachial plexus injuries, satisfactory results cannot be obtained even with total nerve root transfer, especially after serious injuries. To overcome this problem, we hypothesize that the application of stem cells in conjunction with nerve transfer procedures may be a viable alternative to more aggressive treatments that do not result in adequate improvement. Similarly, some preliminary studies have shown that adipose stem cells combined with acellular nerve allograft provide promising results in the repair of brachial plexus injury. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of combining adipose-derived stem cells with nerve transfer procedure in a rat brachial plexus injury model.
    METHODS: Twenty female Wistar rats weighing 300-350 g and aged 8-10 weeks were randomly divided into two groups: a nerve transfer group (NT group) and a nerve transfer combined adipose stem cell group (NT and ASC group). The upper brachial plexus injury model was established by gently avulsing the C5-C6 roots from the spinal cord with microforceps. A nerve transfer from the ulnar nerve to the musculocutaneous nerve (Oberlin procedure) was performed with or without seeded allogeneic adipose tissue-derived stem cells. Adipose tissue-derived stem cells at a rate of 2 × 106 cells were injected locally to the surface of the nerve transfer area with a 23-gauge needle. Immunohistochemistry (S100 and PGP 9.5 antibodies) and electrophysiological data were used to evaluate the effect of nerve repair 12 weeks after surgery.
    RESULTS: The mean latency was significantly longer in the NT group (2.0 ± 0.0 ms, 95% CI: 1.96-2.06) than in the NT and ASC group (1.7 ± 0.0 ms, 95% CI: 1.7-1.7) (p < .001). The mean peak value was higher in the NT group (1.7 ± 0.0 mV, 95% CI: 1.7-1.7) than in the NT and ASC group (1.7 ± 0.3 mV, 95% CI: 1.6-1.9) with no significant difference (p = .61). Although S100 and PGP 9.5 positive areas were observed in higher amounts in the NT and ASC group compared to the NT group, the differences were not statistically significant (p = .26 and .08, respectively).
    CONCLUSIONS: This study conducted on rats provides preliminary evidence that adipose-derived stem cells may have a positive effect on nerve transfer for the treatment of brachial plexus injury. Further studies with larger sample sizes and longer follow-up periods are needed to confirm these findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:通常,在创伤性臂丛神经损伤中,通过前路将SAN神经转移到SSN进行肩关节外展。但是,后路入路的重要优势,例如神经接合与要再神经的肌肉的接近以及消除了对肩胛骨上神经的第二次损伤的影响,使其成为一种替代选择。
    方法:在4年的时间里,收集了30例SAN到SSN转移的臂丛神经损伤患者的回顾性资料,两组各15例,分别为前入路(A组)和后入路(B组)。在18个月时,以肌肉力量和活动范围(ROM)测量肩部的功能结果,并收集患者满意度和外科医生感知的数据。
    结果:两组的肌力无统计学差异(p值=0.34),但B组的外旋转明显恢复(p值=0.02)。在外展和外旋期间,两组活动ROM的统计学差异无统计学意义。与A组的68%相比,后路手术患者的满意度指数为86.7%。外科医生的视角显示,后路手术的肩胛骨上神经探查速度更快,冈上肌收缩的可见性更好,和整体外科医生对后路的偏好。
    结论:后入路肩关节外旋更好,但外展无差异。患者后路恢复较为满意,外科医生更喜欢后路。
    BACKGROUND: Conventionally, neural transfer of the spinal accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve for shoulder abduction in traumatic brachial plexus injury is performed via the anterior approach. However, important advantages of the posterior approach have made it an alternative option, such as the proximity of neural coaptation to the muscle to be reinnervated and negating the effects of a second injury to the suprascapular nerve.
    METHODS: Retrospective data was collected from 30 patients with brachial plexus injury who underwent spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve transfer over 4 years. There were 15 patients in the anterior-approach group (group A) and 15 in the posterior-approach group (group B). Functional outcome at the shoulder was measured as muscle power and active range of motion at 18 months, and data on patients\' satisfaction levels and surgeons\' perceptions was also collected.
    RESULTS: No statistical difference was found in the muscle strength achieved in the 2 groups (P = 0.34), but significant recovery was found in the external rotation achieved by group B (P = 0.02). Statistical difference was insignificant in the 2 groups\' active range of motion during abduction and external rotation. The satisfaction index of patients was 86.7% in group B as compared to 68% in group A. Surgeons\' perspective showed a faster speed of suprascapular nerve exploration in the posterior approach, with better visibility of supraspinatus muscle contraction, and overall surgeons preferred the posterior approach.
    CONCLUSIONS: External rotation at the shoulder is better via the posterior approach, but no difference in abduction was noted. Patients who underwent the posterior approach were more satisfied with the recovery, and surgeons preferred the posterior approach.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尽管同侧C7神经移位术用于C5-C6臂丛神经损伤的治疗,准确评估供体神经(同侧C7神经根)的功能质量是困难的,特别是当C7神经根受到轻微损伤时。这项研究的目的是确定评估同侧C7神经质量的指标,并评估该程序的临床结果。
    方法:本研究采用以下三个指标来评估同侧C7神经的质量:(1)背阔肌肌的肌力和电生理状态,肱三头肌,指伸肌;(2)桡骨三指的灵敏度,尤其是食指;(3)术中外观,同侧C7神经根的感觉和电生理状态。同侧C7神经根向上躯干的转移仅在进行以下三项测试时实施,符合标准,并对8例C5-C6臂丛神经损伤患者的临床结局进行了评估。
    结果:患者获得平均90±42个月的随访。在最后的后续行动中,所有8名患者均实现肘关节屈曲恢复,分别有5例和3例患者的M4和M3评分,根据医学研究委员会的评分。运动恢复的肩展范围平均为86±47°(范围,30°-170°),而肩部外旋平均为51±26°(范围,15°-90°)。
    结论:同侧C7神经移位术在满足三个前提条件的情况下,是C5-C6臂丛神经损伤后肩、肘功能重建的可靠有效选择。
    OBJECTIVE: Although ipsilateral C7 nerve transfer is used for the treatment of C5-C6 brachial plexus injuries, accurately evaluating the functional quality of the donor nerve (ipsilateral C7 nerve root) is difficult, especially when the C7 nerve root is slightly injured. The purpose of this study was to determine the indicators to evaluate the quality of the ipsilateral C7 nerve and assess the clinical outcomes of this procedure.
    METHODS: This study employed the following three indicators to assess the quality of the ipsilateral C7 nerve: (1) the muscle strength and electrophysiological status of the latissimus dorsi, triceps brachii, and extensor digitorum communis; (2) the sensibility of the radial three digits, especially the index finger; and (3) the intraoperative appearance, feel and electrophysiological status of the ipsilateral C7 nerve root. Transfer of the ipsilateral C7 nerve root to the upper trunk was implemented only when the following three tests were conducted, the criteria were met, and the clinical outcomes were assessed in eight patients with C5-C6 brachial plexus injuries.
    RESULTS: Patients were followed-up for an average of 90 ± 42 months. At the final follow-up, all eight patients achieved recovery of elbow flexion, with five and three patients scoring M4 and M3, respectively, according to the Medical Research Council scoring. The shoulder abduction range of motor recovery averaged 86 ± 47° (range, 30°-170°), whereas the shoulder external rotation averaged 51 ± 26° (range, 15°-90°).
    CONCLUSIONS: Ipsilateral C7 nerve transfer is a reliable and effective option for the functional reconstruction of the shoulder and elbow after C5-C6 brachial plexus injuries when the three prerequisites are met.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管常见的损伤,但缺乏已发表的主要数据来指导与运动相关的臂丛神经损伤的临床处理。
    方法:在Medline完成了系统搜索,CINAHL,PubMed,根据PRISMA-ScR指南,SPORTDiscus和WebofScience数据库以及GoogleScholar从成立到2023年8月。纳入文章的方法学质量评估使用JoannaBriggs研究所工具。包括提供有关进行接触运动时被诊断或怀疑的臂丛神经损伤的康复管理的主要数据的研究。
    结果:确定并筛选了65项研究,其中,包括8例病例报告,纳入10名平均年龄为19.8(±4.09)岁的参与者。损伤严重程度存在广泛的异质性,损伤报告,体检和成像方法记录在案。10名参与者中有9名重返竞技体育,虽然后续时期也有很大差异。虽然回归游戏的标准在不同的研究之间有所不同,最一致的指标是无痛肩关节活动范围和力量.
    结论:对于运动性相关臂丛神经损伤的循证康复管理,明显缺乏相关数据。只有8份个案报告包含10名运动员的公开数据报告。进一步的报告对于告知临床管理至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Although a common injury there is a lack of published primary data to inform clinical management of sports related brachial plexus injuries.
    METHODS: A systematic search was completed in Medline, CINAHL, PubMed, SPORTDiscus and Web of Science databases and Google Scholar from inception to August 2023 according to the PRISMA-ScR guidelines. Methodological quality assessment of included articles was with the Joanna Briggs Institute tool. Studies providing primary data as to the rehabilitative management of diagnosed or suspected brachial plexus injuries sustained when playing contact sports were included.
    RESULTS: Sixty-five studies were identified and screened, of which, 8 case reports were included, incorporating 10 participants with a mean age of 19.8 (±4.09) years. There was wide heterogeneity in injury severity, injury reporting, physical examination and imaging approaches documented. 9 of 10 participants returned to competitive sports, though follow-up periods also varied widely. Whilst return to play criteria varied between studies, the most consistent indicator was pain-free shoulder range of motion and strength.
    CONCLUSIONS: There is a distinct lack of data available to inform evidence-based rehabilitation management of sports related brachial plexus injury. Only 8 individual case reports contain published data reporting on 10 athletes. Further reporting is critical to inform clinical management.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    Takayasu动脉炎是一种病因不明的炎症性疾病,会影响大血管。中等船只的参与也有很好的记录;然而,作为表现的神经病是罕见的。在这个案例报告中,一名20多岁的年轻女性,有8个月的右上肢间歇性跛行病史,进展为静息疼痛,C5-C8分布异常疼痛,无痛性右腋窝肿块。在检查中,她的右桡动脉没有脉搏,右锁骨下动脉和腹主动脉有杂音。CT血管造影显示有提示Takayasu动脉炎的特征,右腋窝动脉引起部分血栓形成的动脉瘤,导致右臂丛神经受压。该患者接受甲氨蝶呤和口服皮质类固醇治疗。随访3个月时,动脉瘤的大小缩小了,压缩症状的解决和炎症标志物的正常化。
    Takayasu arteritis is an inflammatory disease of unknown aetiology affecting large vessels. Medium vessel involvement is also well documented; however, neuropathy as a presenting manifestation is rare. In this case report, a young woman in her 20s presented with an 8-month history of intermittent claudication in the right upper limb progressing to rest pain with allodynia in C5-C8 distribution and painless right axillary mass. On examination, she had absent pulses in the right radial, brachial and subclavian artery with audible bruit in the right subclavian and abdominal aorta. CT angiogram showed features suggestive of Takayasu arteritis with a partially thrombosed aneurysm arising from the right axillary artery leading to compression of the right brachial plexus. This patient received treatment with methotrexate and oral corticosteroids. At 3 months follow-up, there was a reduction in the size of the aneurysm, resolution of compressive symptoms and normalisation of inflammatory markers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:臂丛神经撕脱伤(BPA)可导致严重的去咖啡因疼痛。这已经通过背根进入区(DREZ)损伤成功治疗。BPA损伤后解剖结构的变形可能使识别神经结构具有挑战性。我们描述了对手术技术的修改,该技术可以改善手术视野和用于识别DREZ的高级术中神经监测(IONM)。我们已经分析了疼痛的长期结果,生活质量,和DREZ损伤患者的并发症。
    方法:这是一个单中心回顾性病例系列,包括2012年至2022年期间因臂丛神经撕脱伤接受IONMDREZ损伤的患者。分析数据包括术前和术后疼痛(VAS),慢性疼痛的生活质量评分,和并发症。讨论了手术方法的演变。
    结果:44例连续患者接受了术中监测和标测的DREZ损伤手术。在这些患者中,在出院时平均VAS评分从8.9(7-10)提高到1.87(0-6)(p<0.0001)。31例患者随访12个月以上,平均随访时间41个月,结果如下:末次随访时平均VAS值从9.0(7-10)提高到4.1(0-9)(p<0.0001),平均QOL值从3.7(2-6)提高到7.4(4-10)(p<0.0001)。39%的长期结果是“好”,29%的患者“公平”,32%的患者“差”。55%的患者能够停止或减少止痛药。
    结论:手术技术的修改提供了更好的DREZ暴露,和IONM有助于在存在严重硬膜内变化的情况下识别DREZ。DREZ损伤的长期结果不仅表明疼痛的减轻,而且还表明生活质量的显着改善。
    BACKGROUND: Brachial plexus avulsion (BPA) injuries can cause severe deafferentation pain. This has been successfully treated with dorsal root entry zone (DREZ) lesioning. Distortions in anatomy following a BPA injury can make identifying neural structures challenging. We describe a modification to the operative technique that improves the surgical view and the advanced intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) employed to identify DREZ. We have analysed the long-term outcomes for pain, quality of life, and complications in patients undergoing DREZ lesioning.
    METHODS: This is a single-centre retrospective case series including patients who underwent DREZ lesioning with IONM for brachial plexus avulsion between 2012 and 2022. Analysed data included pre- and postoperative pain (VAS), quality of life score for chronic pain, and complications. The evolution of the surgical approach is discussed.
    RESULTS: 44 consecutive patients underwent a DREZ lesioning procedure with intraoperative monitoring and mapping. In these patients the mean VAS score improved from 8.9 (7-10) to 1.87 (0-6) (p < 0.0001) at the time of discharge. 31 patients were followed-up for more than 12 months with a mean duration of follow-up of 41 months and their results were as follows: the mean VAS improved from 9.0 (7-10) to 4.1 (0-9) (p < 0.0001) at the last follow-up and the mean QOL values improved from 3.7 (2-6) to 7.4 (4-10) (p < 0.0001). The long-term outcomes were \'good\' in 39%, \'fair\' in 29% and \'poor\' in 32% of patients. 55% of the patients were able to stop or reduce pain medications.
    CONCLUSIONS: Modifications of surgical technique provide better exposure of DREZ, and IONM aids in identifying DREZ in the presence of severe intra-dural changes. Long-term outcomes of DREZ lesioning indicate not only a reduction in pain but also a significant improvement in quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号