BACKGROUND: Loxoprofen has been actively used clinically to relieve musculoskeletal pain and inflammatory symptoms. However, there are few reports on quantitative pharmacokinetic (PK) prediction tools and diversity analyzes for loxoprofen within populations.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to identify effective covariates associated with explaining inter-individual PK variability through a population pharmacokinetic (Pop-PK) modeling approach for loxoprofen, and to provide a starting point for establishing scientific dosing regimens.
METHODS: The bioequivalence PK results of loxoprofen performed on 52 healthy Korean men and the physiological and biochemical parameters derived from each individual were used as base data for the development of a Pop-PK model of loxoprofen. In order to simultaneously predict the PKs of the active form according to loxoprofen exposure, previously reported PK results of trans-alcohol loxoprofen, an active metabolite of loxoprofen, were used to expand the model.
RESULTS: The Pop-PK profiles of loxoprofen were described in terms of the basic structure of a non-sequential two absorption with 2-disposition compartment, and for inter-individual PK variations, peripheral compartment volume of distribution could be correlated with body surface area (BSA), and central compartment clearance with creatinine clearance (CrCL) and albumin levels. As a result of the model simulation, the concentrations of loxoprofen and its alcoholic metabolites in plasma significantly decreased as CrCL and albumin levels increased and decreased, respectively. On the other hand, it was confirmed that the higher the BSA, the greater the distribution of loxoprofen to the periphery, and the minimum concentrations of loxoprofen and alcoholic metabolites in plasma in steady-state increased by approximately 1.78-2 times, while the fluctuation between maximum and minimum concentrations decreased. The results suggest that patients with large BSA, impaired renal function, and high serum albumin levels may have significantly higher plasma exposure to loxoprofen and trans-alcohol loxoprofen. It was also suggested that the potential side effects in the gastrointestinal system and various tissues and the level of exposure in plasma due to long-term application of loxoprofen in this patient group could be causally explained.
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides a very useful starting point for a scientific precision medicine approach to loxoprofen by discovering effective covariates and establishing a quantitative model that can explain the diversity of loxoprofen PKs within the population.
BACKGROUND: The clinical study protocol used in this study was thoroughly reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the Institute of Bioequivalence and Bridging Study, Chonnam National University, Gwangju, Republic of Korea. The bioequivalence study permit numbers are as follows: 041113; 10.15.2004.

UNASSIGNED: Children with very early onset inflammatory bowel disease (VEO-IBD) are uniquely at risk of inadequate infliximab (IFX) exposure. We studied the association between standard body weight (BW)-based and body surface area (BSA)-based dosing strategies and outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: We identified VEO-IBD patients treated with IFX before 9 years at a single center. Patients were separated into those that received a BSA-based dose (200 mg/m2) and standard BW dosing (5 mg/kg). IFX drug levels, dose intensification, time on steroids, and long-term outcomes were compared. Receiver operator characteristic curves determined the optimal BW- and BSA-based dose to achieve a trough ≥10 μg/ml at dose 4 (IFX#4).
UNASSIGNED: Forty-three children with VEO-IBD were identified. Receiver operator characteristic curves demonstrated optimal BW- and BSA-based doses to achieve IFX trough ≥10 μg/ml at IFX#4 were 7.5 mg/kg and 180mg/m2. Children were classified to standard BW dosing (22/43) and BSA dosing (10/43). IFX#4 trough was significantly higher in those who received BSA dosing (BSA 18.6 μg/ml [interquartile range 10.8-28.1] vs BW 5.1 μg/ml [interquartile range 2.6-10.7], P = .04). BSA dosing was more likely to achieve a target drug level >10 μg/ml at IFX#4 (BSA 70% vs BW 18%, P = .02). BW dosing was associated with a greater likelihood of dose escalation (BW 82% vs BSA 30%, P < .01) and a shorter time to first escalation. BSA dosing was associated with shorter time spent on steroids (P = .02).
UNASSIGNED: Young children require higher IFX dosing to achieve adequate drug exposure. Our data support the use of a BSA-based dose of 200 mg/m2 or, if a BW-based approach is used, 7.5 mg/kg. BSA dosing allows the use of a consistent dose over the age and weight spectrum.

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: The most recommended treatment for stage IV EGFR-positive lung cancer is osimertinib monotherapy. The dosage of osimertinib is fixed at 80 mg/day regardless of body surface area (BSA), however some patients withdraw or reduce the dosage due to adverse events (AEs).
METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 98 patients with EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who received 80 mg osimertinib as the initial treatment. We investigated the impact of BSA on efficacy and safety of osimertinib.
RESULTS: The cut-off value of BSA was estimated using the receiver operating characteristics curve, and was determined to be 1.5 m2. There were 44 patients in the BSA < 1.5 group and 54 patients in the BSA ≥ 1.5 group. There was no significant difference in the incidence of AEs (hematologic toxicity of ≥grade 3 or higher, and non-hematologic toxicity of ≥grade 3) between the two groups. However, the incidence of dose reduction due to AEs was significantly higher in the BSA < 1.5 group compared with the BSA ≥ 1.5 group (16 patients vs 5 patients, p = 0.003). The main reasons were fatigue, anorexia, diarrhea, and liver disfunction. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was not significantly different (16.9 months in the BSA < 1.5 group vs 18.1 months in the BSA ≥ 1.5 group, p = 0.869).
CONCLUSIONS: Differences in BSA affected the optimal dose of osimertinib. However, the PFS with osimertinib treatment was not affected by BSA. Therefore, when using osimertinib as an initial treatment for patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, dose reduction to control AEs should be considered, especially in the BSA<1.5 group.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to define the calf proportion index (CPI) and investigate its association with malnutrition and survival in overweight and obese patients with cancer.
METHODS: This multicenter observational cohort study included 3499 patients diagnosed with cancer, including 3145 overweight and 354 obese individuals. The CPI was defined as the ratio of the cross-sectional area of the calf circumference (CC) to the body surface area (BSA). A CPI calculator that automatically calculated the CPI and survival probability based on the patient\'s sex, height, weight, and CC was developed.
RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 44.1 months, 935 deaths were recorded. Receiver operating characteristic curves revealed that the CPI was better than CC and BSA as a predictor of survival, with AUCs for the 3-year mortality rate were 0.574, 0.553 and 0.529, respectively. In overweight and obese patients with cancer, the optimal CPI cut-off value was 0.65 % for men and 0.57 % for women. The Kaplan-Meier curve revealed that patients with a low CPI had lower survival. After adjusting confounding factors, a low CPI was an independent risk factor for overweight (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.29, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 1.11-1.51, P < 0.001) and obesity (HR: 1.92, 95 % CI: 1.20-3.09, P = 0.007) in patients with cancer. The CPI exhibited significant prognostic value in patients with lung and digestive system cancers. The risk of malnutrition was significantly higher in patients with a low CPI (HR: 1.25, 95 % CI: 1.04-1.50, P = 0.019).
CONCLUSIONS: The CPI is a useful prognostic indicator in overweight and obese patients with cancer, especially in obese patients.

Background: Accurate evaluation of atopic dermatitis (AD) severity is crucial to determine and adjust treatment options. Previous studies have found the product of Investigator\'s Global Assessment (IGA) and affected body surface area (BSA) to be a simple tool, which requires further verification. Objective: To determine the validity of IGA*BSA in assessing the severity of AD across all age, sex, BMI and disease severity groups. Method: We performed a retrospective study of AD using data from a national cohort (China Type II Inflammatory Skin Disease Clinical Research and Standardized Diagnosis and Treatment Project). Results: Overall, 3051 participants were included in the final analysis. IGA*BSA correlated better with objective measures than with subjective measures. IGA*BSA significantly correlated with Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) (r = 0.81), which was stronger than either IGA or BSA alone with EASI, regardless of age, sex, Body Mass Index (BMI), and disease severity groups. Besides, IGA*BSA mild, moderate, and severe groups were associated with significantly higher scores of other assessments and had moderate to fair concordance with other assessments severity strata. At follow-up, the concordance of improvement between IGA*BSA 50/75/90 and EASI 50/75/90 was observed (ĸ = 0.65, 0.62, 0.58, respectively). Conclusion: IGA*BSA appears to be a valid objective assessment of AD severity and improvement over time across all age, sex, BMI, and disease severity subgroups in the clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Assessment of kidney function is necessary for prescribing renally excreted drugs. The estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) routinely reported by laboratories is indexed to a body surface area (BSA) of 1.73 m2. In obese patients, the indexed eGFR may underestimate directly measured GFR.
OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of obesity in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) and examine the effect of adjusting the indexed eGFR for patient BSA (deindexing) across CKD Stages 2-5.
METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study of 575 adults with stable CKD from two general nephrology clinics over 6 months. Dialysis and kidney transplant patients were excluded. We used four equations (Mosteller, Dubois, Haycock and Schlich) to determine BSA based on actual body weight and applied Bland-Altman plots and piecewise linear regression to examine the relationship between deindexed and indexed eGFR.
RESULTS: The median age was 68 years (58% male). The prevalence of overweight and obesity was 31% and 47% respectively. Mean body mass index was 29.7 kg/m2. The Schlich equation for BSA produced the smallest adjustment in eGFR, while the Haycock equation produced the largest adjustment. Males experienced the largest change in eGFR from deindexing because of larger BSAs. Although bias became increasingly positive with higher eGFR, the linear regression stratified by CKD stage indicated that deindexing had little impact with eGFR <45 mL/min/1.73 m2.
CONCLUSIONS: In CKD, deindexing the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration eGFR may not be necessary when the eGFR is <45 mL/min/1.73 m2, particularly if the patient is female.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

BACKGROUND: There is limited data on cardiac output in patients with small aortic annuli undergoing trans-catheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) according to the implanted platform of balloon-expandable (BEV) compared to self-expanding valves (SEV).
METHODS: This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients with severe aortic stenosis and small annuli who underwent successful TAVI. Cardiac output was measured using echocardiography within 4 weeks following TAVI. Data were recorded and analysed by an experienced operator who was not aware of the type of the implanted valve.
RESULTS: 138 patients were included in the analysis, of whom 57 % underwent TAVI with BEV. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were comparable between the two platforms, except for more frequent previous cardiac surgery and smaller indexed aortic valve in the BEV group. There was no relationship between computed tomography-derived aortic annulus area and cardiac output post TAVI. When compared to patients who underwent TAVI with BEV, those with SEV had larger cardiac output [mean difference - 0.50 l/min, 95 % CI (-0.99, -0.01)] and cardiac index [mean difference - 0.20 l/min/m2, 95 % CI (-0.47, 0.07)], although the latter did not reach statistical significance. Unlike patients with small body surface area, in those with large body surface area both cardiac output and cardiac index were statistically larger in patients who underwent SEV compared to BEV.
CONCLUSIONS: Cardiac output, as measured by echocardiography, was larger in patients with small annuli who underwent TAVI procedure with SEV compared to BEV. Such difference was more evident in patients with large body surface area.