Blood-based

基于血液
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    儿童结核病(TB)的确诊诊断仍然是一个挑战,主要是由于其对痰液样本的依赖性和该疾病的细菌少性质。因此,只有约30%的儿童疑似病例得到诊断,需要微创,非基于痰的生物标志物仍未满足。通过测量基于血液的转录组标记来理解宿主分子变化已显示出有望作为结核病的诊断工具。然而,性别对疾病异质性和诊断的影响仍有待理解.使用公开可用的基因表达数据(GSE39939,GSE39940;n=370),我们报告了一种性别特异性RNA生物标志物标记,该标记可改善儿童结核病的诊断.我们发现了男性的四个基因生物标志物特征(SLAMF8,GBP2,WARS,和FCGR1C)和来自肯尼亚的女性儿科患者(GBP6,CELSR3,ALDH1A1和GBP4),南非,和马拉维。两种特征均实现了85%的灵敏度和70%的特异性,接近世卫组织推荐的目标产品概况进行分诊测试。我们的基因特征优于以前报道的用于儿童结核病诊断的大多数其他基因特征。
    Confirmatory diagnosis of childhood tuberculosis (TB) remains a challenge mainly due to its dependence on sputum samples and the paucibacillary nature of the disease. Thus, only ~ 30% of suspected cases in children are diagnosed and the need for minimally invasive, non-sputum-based biomarkers remains unmet. Understanding host molecular changes by measuring blood-based transcriptomic markers has shown promise as a diagnostic tool for TB. However, the implication of sex contributing to disease heterogeneity and therefore diagnosis remains to be understood. Using publicly available gene expression data (GSE39939, GSE39940; n = 370), we report a sex-specific RNA biomarker signature that could improve the diagnosis of TB disease in children. We found four gene biomarker signatures for male (SLAMF8, GBP2, WARS, and FCGR1C) and female pediatric patients (GBP6, CELSR3, ALDH1A1, and GBP4) from Kenya, South Africa, and Malawi. Both signatures achieved a sensitivity of 85% and a specificity of 70%, which approaches the WHO-recommended target product profile for a triage test. Our gene signatures outperform most other gene signatures reported previously for childhood TB diagnosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    间皮瘤是一种侵袭性癌症,与先前接触石棉密切相关。通常,在疾病的晚期发现肿瘤。在早期阶段检测可能是有意义的,因为当肿瘤负担相对较低且肿瘤尚未扩散到远处时,治疗可能更有效。血液中循环生物标志物可能是改善间皮瘤早期检测的有希望的工具,但对于无症状受试者的筛查,候选生物标志物需要在适当的研究中进行验证.进行这项研究是为了评估生物标志物在液体活检中的性能,以检测早期的间皮瘤。在10年的时间里,每年检查2769名以前接触过石棉的志愿者,并收集液体活检。在最后一次采血后17个月完成随访。这篇文章详细概述了我们在进行前瞻性研究的经验教训和经验,纵向,多中心研究。现有的风险个体队列非常适合验证基于血液的生物标志物,用于间皮瘤和肺癌的早期检测。
    Mesothelioma is an aggressive cancer, strongly associated with prior exposure to asbestos. Commonly, tumors are detected at late stages of the disease. Detection at early stages might be meaningful, because therapies might be more effective when the tumor burden is relatively low and the tumor has not spread to distant sites. Circulating biomarkers in blood might be a promising tool to improve the early detection of mesothelioma, but for screening in asymptomatic subjects, candidate biomarkers need to be validated in appropriate studies. This study was conducted to assess the performance of biomarkers in liquid biopsies to detect mesothelioma at early stages. Over a period of 10 years, 2769 volunteers formerly exposed to asbestos were annually examined and liquid biopsies were collected. A follow-up was completed 17 months after the last blood collection. The article provides a detailed overview of our lessons learned and experiences of conducting a prospective, longitudinal, multicenter study. The existing cohort of individuals at risk is highly suitable for the validation of blood-based biomarkers for the early detection of mesothelioma as well as lung cancer.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们研究了新型血浆生物标志物是否与认知相关,认知能力下降,以及神经退行性疾病中日常生活活动的功能独立性。
    方法:胶质纤维酸性蛋白(GFAP),神经丝轻链(NfL),在44名健康对照和480名诊断为阿尔茨海默病/轻度认知损害(AD/MCI)的参与者中,使用超敏感的Simoa免疫测定法测定磷酸化tau(p-tau)181和淀粉样蛋白β(Aβ)42/40,帕金森病(PD),额颞叶痴呆(FTD)谱系障碍,或脑血管疾病(CVD)。
    结果:GFAP,NFL,和/或p-tau181在所有疾病中与对照组相比升高,并广泛地与较差的基线认知表现相关,更大的认知能力下降,和/或较低的功能独立性。而GFAP,NFL,p-tau181对疾病有很高的预测能力,p-tau181对AD/MCI队列更具特异性。在FTD和CVD队列以及Aβ42/40中发现了稀疏关联。
    结论:GFAP,NFL,和p-tau181是对常见神经退行性疾病的认知和功能的有价值的预测因子,并可能在专门诊所和临床试验中有用。
    We investigated whether novel plasma biomarkers are associated with cognition, cognitive decline, and functional independence in activities of daily living across and within neurodegenerative diseases.
    Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), neurofilament light chain (NfL), phosphorylated tau (p-tau)181 and amyloid beta (Aβ)42/40 were measured using ultra-sensitive Simoa immunoassays in 44 healthy controls and 480 participants diagnosed with Alzheimer\'s disease/mild cognitive impairment (AD/MCI), Parkinson\'s disease (PD), frontotemporal dementia (FTD) spectrum disorders, or cerebrovascular disease (CVD).
    GFAP, NfL, and/or p-tau181 were elevated among all diseases compared to controls, and were broadly associated with worse baseline cognitive performance, greater cognitive decline, and/or lower functional independence. While GFAP, NfL, and p-tau181 were highly predictive across diseases, p-tau181 was more specific to the AD/MCI cohort. Sparse associations were found in the FTD and CVD cohorts and for Aβ42/40 .
    GFAP, NfL, and p-tau181 are valuable predictors of cognition and function across common neurodegenerative diseases, and may be useful in specialized clinics and clinical trials.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目前胰腺腺癌(PDAC)的基于血液的预后生物标志物是有限的。最近,SFRP1(phSFRP1)的启动子高甲基化与吉西他滨治疗的IV期PDAC患者的不良预后相关。本研究探讨了phSFRP1在低阶段PDAC患者中的作用。
    基于亚硫酸氢盐处理工艺,用甲基化特异性PCR分析SFRP1基因的启动子区.卡普兰-迈耶曲线,对数秩测试,和广义线性回归分析用于评估12个月和24个月的限制性平均生存期.
    该研究包括211例I-II期PDAC患者。phSFRP1患者的中位总生存期为13.1个月,与未甲基化SFRP1(umSFRP1)患者的19.6个月相比。在调整后的分析中,在12个月和24个月时,phSFRP1与1.15个月(95CI-2.11,-0.20)和2.71个月(95CI-2.71,-0.45)的寿命损失相关,分别。phSFRP1对无病或无进展生存期没有显著影响。在I-II阶段PDAC,phSFRP1患者的预后比umSFRP1患者差.
    结果提示不良预后可能是由于辅助化疗获益减少所致。SFRP1可能有助于指导临床医生,并成为表观遗传修饰药物的可能靶标。
    UNASSIGNED: Current prognostic blood-based biomarkers for pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) are limited. Recently, promoter hypermethylation of SFRP1 (phSFRP1) has been linked to poor prognosis in patients with gemcitabine-treated stage IV PDAC. This study explores the effects of phSFRP1 in patients with lower stage PDAC.
    UNASSIGNED: Based on a bisulfite treatment process, the promoter region of the SFRP1 gene was analyzed with methylation-specific PCR. Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank tests, and generalized linear regression analysis were used to assess restricted mean survival time survival at 12 and 24 months.
    UNASSIGNED: The study included 211 patients with stage I-II PDAC. The median overall survival of patients with phSFRP1 was 13.1 months, compared to 19.6 months in patients with unmethylated SFRP1 (umSFRP1). In adjusted analysis, phSFRP1 was associated with a loss of 1.15 months (95%CI -2.11, -0.20) and 2.71 months (95%CI -2.71, -0.45) of life at 12 and 24 months, respectively. There was no significant effect of phSFRP1 on disease-free or progression-free survival. In stage I-II PDAC, patients with phSFRP1 have worse prognoses than patients with umSFRP1.
    UNASSIGNED: Results could indicate that the poor prognosis may be caused by reduced benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. SFRP1 may help guide the clinician and be a possible target for epigenetically modifying drugs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胰腺导管腺癌仍然是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因之一。不幸的是,目前的预后生物标志物是有限的,并且不存在预测性生物标志物。这项研究检查了cfDNA中分泌的卷曲相关蛋白1(phSFRP1)的启动子超甲基化,作为转移性FOLFIRINOX治疗的PDAC和局部晚期PDAC患者的预后生物标志物和治疗效果的预测因子。
    方法:我们对SFRP1基因启动子区进行了甲基化特异性PCR,基于亚硫酸氢盐处理。使用伪观察方法将生存评估为事件发生时间数据,并用Kaplan-Meier曲线和广义线性回归进行分析。
    结果:该研究包括52例FOLFIRINOX治疗的转移性PDAC患者。未甲基化(um)SFRP1患者(n=29)的中位总生存期(15.7个月)比phSFRP1患者(6.8个月)更长。在粗略回归中,phSFRP1与12个月和24个月时死亡风险增加36.9%(95%CI12.0%-61.7%)和19.8%(95%CI1.9-37.6)相关,分别。在补充回归分析中,SFRP1甲基化状态和治疗之间的相互作用是显著的,表明化疗的益处降低。包括44例局部晚期PDAC患者。phSFRP1与24个月时的死亡风险增加相关结论:这表明phSFRP1是转移性PDAC和局部晚期PDAC中临床有用的预后生物标志物。结合现有文献,结果可以表明cfDNA测量的phSFRP1作为转移性PDAC患者标准姑息性化疗的预测生物标志物的价值。这可以促进转移性PDAC患者的个性化治疗。
    BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma remains one of the major causes of cancer-related mortality globally. Unfortunately, current prognostic biomarkers are limited, and no predictive biomarkers exist. This study examined promoter hypermethylation of secreted frizzled-related protein 1 (phSFRP1) in cfDNA as a prognostic biomarker and predictor of treatment effect in patients with metastatic FOLFIRINOX-treated PDAC and locally advanced PDAC.
    METHODS: We performed methylation-specific PCR of the SFRP1 genes\' promoter region, based on bisulfite treatment. Survival was assessed as time-to-event data using the pseudo-observation method and analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves and generalized linear regressions.
    RESULTS: The study included 52 patients with FOLFIRINOX-treated metastatic PDAC. Patients with unmethylated (um) SFRP1 (n = 29) had a longer median overall survival (15.7 months) than those with phSFRP1 (6.8 months). In crude regression, phSFRP1 was associated with an increased risk of death of 36.9% (95% CI 12.0%-61.7%) and 19.8% (95% CI 1.9-37.6) at 12 and 24-months, respectively. In supplementary regression analysis, interaction terms between SFRP1 methylation status and treatment were significant, indicating reduced benefit of chemotherapy. Forty-four patients with locally advanced PDAC were included. phSFRP1 was associated with an increased risk of death at 24-months CONCLUSIONS: This indicates that phSFRP1 is a clinically useful prognostic biomarker in metastatic PDAC and possibly in locally advanced PDAC. Together with existing literature, results could indicate the value of cfDNA-measured phSFRP1 as a predictive biomarker of standard palliative chemotherapy in patients with metastatic PDAC. This could facilitate personalized treatment of patients with metastatic PDAC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:基于血液的生物标志物是诊断前驱阶段阿尔茨海默病(AD)(轻度认知损害-MCI)的有前途的工具,并希望作为有认知不适的患者的筛查工具。在这项工作中,我们评估了周围神经生物标志物预测AD-痴呆进展的潜力,以及血液和CSF-AD标志物在一般神经科转诊的MCI患者中的关系。
    方法:纳入了在科英布拉大学中心医院神经内科随访的106名MCI患者。有关基线神经心理学评估的数据,所有患者均可获得Aβ42,Aβ40,t-Tau和p-Tau181的CSF水平。Aβ42,Aβ40,t-Tau,p-Tau181、GFAP和NfL水平通过商业单分子阵列(SiMoA)测定在基线储存的血清和血浆样品中测定。在随访时评估从MCI到AD-痴呆的进展(平均5.8±3.4年)。
    结果:在基线血液标志物NfL,在随访时进展为AD的患者中GFAP和p-Tau181显著增加(p<0.001)。相反,血浆Aβ42/40比值和t-Tau在组间无显著差异。NFL,GFAP和p-Tau181显示出良好的诊断准确性,可识别AD-痴呆的进展(AUC分别为0.81、0.80和0.76),合并后改善(AUC=0.89)。GFAP和p-Tau181与CSFAβ42相关。p-Tau181与NfL的关联是由GFAP介导的,与总效应的88%显著间接关联。
    结论:我们的研究结果强调了结合基于血液的GFAP的潜力,NfL和p-Tau181将作为MCI的预后工具。
    Blood-based biomarkers are promising tools for the diagnosis of Alzheimer disease (AD) at prodromal stages (mild cognitive impairment [MCI]) and are hoped to be implemented as screening tools for patients with cognitive complaints. In this work, we evaluated the potential of peripheral neurological biomarkers to predict progression to AD dementia and the relation between blood and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) AD markers in MCI patients referred from a general neurological department.
    A group of 106 MCI patients followed at the Neurology Department of Coimbra University Hospital was included. Data regarding baseline neuropsychological evaluation, CSF levels of amyloid β 42 (Aβ42), Aβ40, total tau (t-Tau), and phosphorylated tau 181 (p-Tau181) were available for all the patients. Aβ42, Aβ40, t-Tau, p-Tau181, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), and neurofilament light chain (NfL) levels were determined in baseline stored serum and plasma samples by commercial SiMoA (Single Molecule Array) assays. Progression from MCI to AD dementia was assessed at follow-up (mean = 5.8 ± 3.4 years).
    At baseline, blood markers NfL, GFAP, and p-Tau181 were significantly increased in patients who progressed to AD at follow-up (p < 0.001). In contrast, plasma Aβ42/40 ratio and t-Tau showed no significant differences between groups. NfL, GFAP, and p-Tau181 demonstrated good diagnostic accuracy to identify progression to AD dementia (area under the curve [AUC] = 0.81, 0.80, and 0.76, respectively), which improved when combined (AUC = 0.89). GFAP and p-Tau181 were correlated with CSF Aβ42. Association of p-Tau181 with NfL was mediated by GFAP, with a significant indirect association of 88% of the total effect.
    Our findings highlight the potential of combining blood-based GFAP, NfL, and p-Tau181 to be applied as a prognostic tool in MCI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:神经炎症构成阿尔茨海默病(AD)的病理标志。尽管如此,如果外周炎症标志物可用于类似于基于血液的β-淀粉样蛋白和神经变性措施的研究目的,则仍未解决。我们调查了血清中的实验性炎症标志物,并分析了与AD病理特征的相互关系,重点是AD的风险阶段。
    方法:74名健康对照(HC)的数据,99主观认知能力下降(SCD),75轻度认知障碍(MCI),23AD亲戚,从DELCODE队列中获得38名AD受试者。使用免疫测定确定一组20种血清生物标志物。分析根据年龄进行了调整,性别,APOE状态,和体重指数,并包括血清和CSF标志物水平与AD生物标志物水平之间的相关性。分组比较基于筛选诊断和基于常规AD生物标志物的示意图。将结构成像数据组合成代表Braak阶段区域并与血清生物标志物水平相关的综合评分。临床前阿尔茨海默氏症认知综合(PACC5)评分用于测试生物标志物与认知表现之间的关联。
    结果:每个实验标记都显示出与AD生物标志物相互关系的个体概况,成像,或认知特征。血清可溶性AXL(sAXL),IL-6和YKL-40表现出最显著的关联。在具有病理性CSFβ-淀粉样蛋白/tau谱的AD受试者中,可溶性AXL显著升高,并且与结构成像和认知功能负相关。血清IL-6与Braak区域的结构测量呈负相关,与相应的IL-6CSF水平或其他AD特征无关。血清YKL-40与CSFAD生物标志物谱最一致,并显示与结构的最强负相关,但没有认知结果。
    结论:血清sAXL,IL-6和YKL-40与不同的AD特征有关,包括神经病理学和认知功能的程度。这可能表明外周血特征对应于疾病的特定阶段。由于血清标志物不能反映相应的CSF蛋白水平,我们的数据强调需要根据各自蛋白的特定生物学和细胞来源来解释血清炎症标志物.必须考虑这些标记特异性差异以进一步定义和解释用于AD研究的基于血液的炎症谱。
    Neuroinflammation constitutes a pathological hallmark of Alzheimer\'s disease (AD). Still, it remains unresolved if peripheral inflammatory markers can be utilized for research purposes similar to blood-based beta-amyloid and neurodegeneration measures. We investigated experimental inflammation markers in serum and analyzed interrelations towards AD pathology features in a cohort with a focus on at-risk stages of AD.
    Data of 74 healthy controls (HC), 99 subjective cognitive decline (SCD), 75 mild cognitive impairment (MCI), 23 AD relatives, and 38 AD subjects were obtained from the DELCODE cohort. A panel of 20 serum biomarkers was determined using immunoassays. Analyses were adjusted for age, sex, APOE status, and body mass index and included correlations between serum and CSF marker levels and AD biomarker levels. Group-wise comparisons were based on screening diagnosis and routine AD biomarker-based schematics. Structural imaging data were combined into composite scores representing Braak stage regions and related to serum biomarker levels. The Preclinical Alzheimer\'s Cognitive Composite (PACC5) score was used to test for associations between the biomarkers and cognitive performance.
    Each experimental marker displayed an individual profile of interrelations to AD biomarkers, imaging, or cognition features. Serum-soluble AXL (sAXL), IL-6, and YKL-40 showed the most striking associations. Soluble AXL was significantly elevated in AD subjects with pathological CSF beta-amyloid/tau profile and negatively related to structural imaging and cognitive function. Serum IL-6 was negatively correlated to structural measures of Braak regions, without associations to corresponding IL-6 CSF levels or other AD features. Serum YKL-40 correlated most consistently to CSF AD biomarker profiles and showed the strongest negative relations to structure, but none to cognitive outcomes.
    Serum sAXL, IL-6, and YKL-40 relate to different AD features, including the degree of neuropathology and cognitive functioning. This may suggest that peripheral blood signatures correspond to specific stages of the disease. As serum markers did not reflect the corresponding CSF protein levels, our data highlight the need to interpret serum inflammatory markers depending on the respective protein\'s specific biology and cellular origin. These marker-specific differences will have to be considered to further define and interpret blood-based inflammatory profiles for AD research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们最近得出并验证了基于血清的microRNA风险评分(miR-score),该评分在一个大型人群队列的14年随访内以非常高的准确性预测结直肠癌(CRC)的发生。这里,我们旨在评估和比较miR评分在结直肠癌发生不同阶段结肠镜检查筛查参与者中的分布.通过定量实时聚合酶链反应对患有CRC的结肠镜检查参与者(n=52)的血清样本中的microRNAs(miRNAs)进行了分析。晚期结直肠腺瘤(AA,n=100),非晚期结直肠腺瘤(NAA,n=88),和没有结直肠肿瘤的参与者(n=173)。通过Mann-WhitneyU检验比较各组之间的miR-评分的平均值。使用逻辑回归分析评估miR评分与结直肠肿瘤风险的相关性。与NAA(p=0.027)和CRC(p=0.014)相比,AA患者的MicroRNA风险评分明显更高。而NAA患者和没有结直肠肿瘤患者之间无统计学差异(p=0.127)。当比较相邻组时,miR-评分与CRC和AA呈负相关,与AA和NAA呈正相关[比值比(OR),0.37(95%置信区间(CI),0.16-0.86)和OR,2.22(95%CI,1.06-4.64),分别]。我们的结果与以下假设一致:高miR评分可能表明CRC风险增加,从非晚期到晚期结直肠肿瘤的进展趋势增加。随着CRC表现后miR模式的变化。
    We recently derived and validated a serum-based microRNA risk score (miR-score) which predicted colorectal cancer (CRC) occurrence with very high accuracy within 14 years of follow-up in a large population-based cohort. Here, we aimed to assess and compare the distribution of the miR-score among participants of screening colonoscopy at various stages of colorectal carcinogenesis. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) were profiled by quantitative-real-time-polymerase-chain-reaction in the serum samples of screening colonoscopy participants with CRC (n = 52), advanced colorectal adenoma (AA, n = 100), non-advanced colorectal adenoma (NAA, n = 88), and participants free of colorectal neoplasms (n = 173). The mean values of the miR-score were compared between groups by the Mann-Whitney U test. The associations of the miR-score with risk for colorectal neoplasms were evaluated using logistic regression analyses. MicroRNA risk scores were significantly higher among participants with AA than among those with NAA (p = 0.027) and those with CRC (p = 0.014), whereas no statistically significant difference was seen between those with NAA and those with no colorectal neoplasms (p = 0.127). When comparing adjacent groups, miR-scores were inversely associated with CRC versus AA and positively associated with AA versus NAA [odds ratio (OR), 0.37 (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.16-0.86) and OR, 2.22 (95% CI, 1.06-4.64) for the top versus bottom tertiles, respectively]. Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that a high miR-score may be indicative of an increased CRC risk by an increased tendency of progression from non-advanced to advanced colorectal neoplasms, along with a change of the miR-patterns after CRC manifestation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近,具有提供者处方和自付费用的患者可以使用多发性癌症早期检测小组。除了理论建模之外,尽管初级保健提供者(PCP)很有可能以一定的频率订购这些检测,但人们对这些检测将如何影响初级保健实践知之甚少.特别是,有关于病人咨询的担忧,成本,测试频率,患者焦虑,以及随后的阳性结果测试。这篇综述旨在评估当前的文献,并提供一个PCP可以用来与患者讨论这些测试并简化其订购的框架。解释,并全面运用到日常实践中。
    Multicancer early detection panels have recently become available to patients with a provider\'s prescription and an out-of-pocket fee. Beyond theoretical modeling, little is known about how these assays will impact primary care practices despite a high likelihood that primary care providers (PCPs) will be ordering these tests with some frequency. In particular, there are concerns about patient counseling, costs, frequency of testing, patient anxiety, and subsequent testing for a positive result. This review aims to appraise the current literature and provide a framework that PCPs can use to discuss these tests with patients and streamline their ordering, interpretation, and overall use into everyday practice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    No reliable predictive blood-based biomarkers are available for determining survival from pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC). This combined discovery and validation study examines promoter hypermethylation (ph) of secreted frizzled-related protein 1 (SFRP1) in plasma-derived cell-free DNA as an independent prognostic marker for survival and Gemcitabine effectiveness in patients with stage IV PDAC. We conducted methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction analysis of the promoter region of the SFRP1 gene, based on bisulfite treatment. Survival was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier curves, log-rank test, and Cox regression. The discovery cohort included 40 patients, 25 receiving Gem. Gem-treated patients with phSFRP1 had a shorter median overall survival (mOS) (4.4 months) than unmethylated patients (11.6 months). Adjusted Cox-regression yielded a hazard rate (HR) of 3.48 (1.39-8.70). The validation cohort included 58 Gem-treated patients. Patients with phSFRP1 had a shorter mOS (3.2 months) than unmethylated patients (6.3 months). Adjusted Cox regression yielded an HR of 3.53 (1.85-6.74). In both cohorts, phSFRP1 was associated with poorer survival in Gem-treated patients. This may indicate that tumors with phSFRP1 are more aggressive and less sensitive to Gem treatment. This knowledge may facilitate tailored treatment of patients with stage IV PDAC. Further studies are planned to examine phSFRP1 in more intensive chemotherapy regimens.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号