High systolic blood pressure (BP) is the most important modifiable risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Managing systolic hypertension is especially difficult in underserved populations wherein access to cuff BP devices is limited. We showed that ubiquitous smartphones without force sensing can be converted into absolute pulse pressure (PP) monitors. The concept is for the user to perform guided thumb and hand maneuvers with the phone to induce cuff-like actuation and allow built-in sensors to make cuff-like measurements for computing PP. We developed an Android smartphone PP application. The \'app\' could be learned by volunteers and yielded PP with total error < 8 mmHg against cuff PP (N = 24). We also analyzed a large population-level database comprising adults less than 65 years old to show that PP plus other basic information can detect systolic hypertension with ROC AUC of 0.9. The smartphone PP app could ultimately help reduce the burden of systolic hypertension in underserved populations and thus health disparities.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of ankle blood pressure measurements in relation to invasive blood pressure in the lateral position.
METHODS: This prospective observational study included adult patients scheduled for elective non-cardiac surgery under general anesthesia in the lateral position. Paired radial artery invasive and ankle noninvasive blood pressure readings were recorded in the lateral position using GE Carescape B650 monitor. The primary outcome was the ability of ankle mean arterial pressure (MAP) to detect hypotension (MAP < 70 mmHg) using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) analysis. The secondary outcomes were the ability of ankle systolic blood pressure (SBP) to detect hypertension (SBP > 140 mmHg) as well as bias (invasive measurement - noninvasive measurement), and agreement between the two methods using the Bland-Altman analysis.
RESULTS: We analyzed 415 paired readings from 30 patients. The AUC (95% confidence interval [CI]) of ankle MAP for detecting hypotension was 0.88 (0.83-0.93). An ankle MAP of ≤ 86 mmHg had negative and positive predictive values (95% CI) of 99 (97-100)% and 21 (15-29)%, respectively, for detecting hypotension. The AUC (95% CI) of ankle SBP to detect hypertension was 0.83 (0.79-0.86) with negative and positive predictive values (95% CI) of 95 (92-97)% and 36 (26-46)%, respectively, at a cutoff value of > 144 mmHg. The mean bias between the two methods was - 12 ± 17, 3 ± 12, and - 1 ± 11 mmHg for the SBP, diastolic blood pressure, and MAP, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: In patients under general anesthesia in the lateral position, ankle blood pressure measurements are not interchangeable with the corresponding invasive measurements. However, an ankle MAP > 86 mmHg can exclude hypotension with 99% accuracy, and an ankle SBP < 144 mmHg can exclude hypertension with 95% accuracy.

UNASSIGNED: Erroneous blood pressure measurement could lead to improper treatment and hence progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD). In routine clinical practice, there is poor adherence to the various steps to be followed during blood pressure measurement. Automated oscillometric BP measurement is difficult to perform in routine clinical practice due to several practical limitations.
UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the quality of blood pressure measurement and to compare routine office blood pressure measurement with standardized attended manually activated oscillometric blood pressure measurement in patients with CKD attending the nephrology outpatient department (OPD) of a tertiary care referral center.
UNASSIGNED: This cross-sectional study was conducted in patients aged more than 18 years with CKD stage 3-5ND, and previously diagnosed hypertension, in the nephrology OPD of a tertiary care referral center between July 2022 and September 2022.
UNASSIGNED: The quality of blood pressure measurement was evaluated using a questionnaire. The study participants had their blood pressure checked by both methods-routine office blood pressure and standardized attended manually activated oscillometric blood pressure.
UNASSIGNED: Standardized attended manually activated oscillometric blood pressure measurement yielded a significantly higher systolic blood pressure (SBP) compared to routine office blood pressure measurement (Mean SBP: 139.53 ± 29.1 vs 132.57 ± 23.59; P < 0.001). However, the diastolic blood pressure did not differ significantly between the two methods of measurement.
UNASSIGNED: Standardized attended manually activated oscillometric BP measurement yields a higher systolic BP compared to routine office BP measurement. Further studies are required to compare the standardized attended oscillometric BP measurement used in this study with unattended automated oscillometric BP measurement and ambulatory BP measurement.

OBJECTIVE: A novel automated auscultatory upper arm cuff blood pressure (BP) monitor KOROT V2 Doctor (InBody BPBIO280KV) was developed for professional use. An electronic stethoscope embedded in the device cuff records the Korotkoff sounds, which are graphically displayed during deflation allowing visual evaluation by the healthcare professional. The device provides automated measurements of BP and this study evaluated its accuracy.
METHODS: The requirements of the Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation/European Society of Hypertension/International Organization for Standardization (AAMI/ESH/ISO) Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) and its Amendment 1.2020-01 were applied. Participants were recruited to fulfill the age, sex, BP, arm circumference, and cuff distribution criteria of the Universal Standard and its Amendment in a general population using the same arm sequential measurement method. Three cuffs of the test device were tested for arm circumference 23-28, 28-35, and 33-42 cm.
RESULTS: Data from 85 individuals were analyzed [mean age: 56.4 ± 16.0 (SD) years, 50 men, arm circumference 23-42 cm]. For validation Criterion 1, the mean difference ±SD between the test device and reference BP readings (N = 255) was -1.3 ± 6.0/1.5 ± 5.0 mmHg (systolic/diastolic; threshold ≤5 ± 8 mmHg). For Criterion 2, the SD of the averaged BP differences per individual (N = 85) was 4.61/3.48 mmHg (systolic/diastolic; threshold ≤6.82/6.78 mmHg).
CONCLUSIONS: The KOROT V2 Doctor (InBody BPBIO280KV) device for professional use, which provides automated auscultatory measurements with visual display of the Korotkoff sounds, comfortably fulfills all the requirements of the AAMI/ESH/ISO Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2018) in a general population and can be recommended for clinical use.

BACKGROUND: The current standard approach to measuring home blood pressure (BP) involves taking measurements while sitting in a chair. In cultures where floor sitting is common, including Korea, assessing BP while sitting on the floor would be more feasible. However, there is still a lack of research investigating whether BP measurements obtained while seated in a chair and while sitting on the floor can be regarded as interchangeable. The aim of the study was to evaluate whether there is a difference between BP measurements taken while sitting in a chair and while sitting on the floor in a Korean adult.
METHODS: Among the participants who visited for evaluation of pulse wave velocity, a total of 116 participants who agreed to participate in the study were randomly selected. All subjects rested for 5 min, and BP measurements were taken at 1-min intervals according to a randomly assigned order of standard method (chair-sitting) and BP in a seated on the floor (floor-sitting).
RESULTS: Of the 116 participants, the median age was 68 (with an interquartile range of 59 to 75), and 82% were men. There were no significant differences in systolic BP (SBP, 129.1 ± 17.8 mmHg in chair-sitting and 130.1 ± 18.9 mmHg in floor-sitting, P = 0.228) and diastolic BP (DBP, 73.9 ± 11.4 mmHg in chair-sitting and 73.7 ± 11.4 mmHg in floor-sitting, P = 0.839) between the two positions. In addition, there was a high level of agreement between BP measurements taken in the two positions (intraclass correlation coefficients: 0.882 for SBP and 0.890 for DBP).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide important insights into securing the reliability of home BP measurements through the commonly practiced floor-sitting posture in cultures where floor sitting is common. Furthermore, this could serve as substantial evidence for providing specific home BP measurement guidelines to patients who adhere to a floor-sitting lifestyle.

BACKGROUND: Postpartum hypertension is a risk factor for severe maternal morbidity; however, barriers exist for diagnosis and treatment. Remote blood pressure (BP) monitoring programs are an effective tool for monitoring BP and may mitigate maternal health disparities. We aimed to describe and evaluate engagement in a remote BP monitoring program on BP ascertainment during the first 6-weeks postpartum among a diverse patient population.
RESULTS: A postpartum remote BP monitoring program, using cell-enabled technology and delivered in multiple languages, was implemented at a large safety-net hospital. Eligible patients are those with hypertensive disorders before or during pregnancy. We describe characteristics of patients enrolled from January 2021 to May 2022 and examine program engagement by patient characteristics. Linear regression models were used to calculate mean differences and 95% CIs between characteristics and engagement metrics. We describe the prevalence of patients with BP ≥140/or >90 mm Hg. Among 1033 patients, BP measures were taken an average of 15.2 days during the 6-weeks, with the last measurement around 1 month (mean: 30.9 days), and little variability across race or ethnicity. Younger maternal age (≤25 years) was associated with less frequent measures (mean difference, -4.3 days [95% CI: -6.1 to -2.4]), and grandmultiparity (≥4 births) was associated with shorter engagement (mean difference, -3.5 days [95% CI, -6.1 to -1.0]). Prevalence of patients with BP ≥140/or >90 mm Hg was 62.3%, with differences by race or ethnicity (Black: 72.9%; Hispanic: 52.4%; White: 56.0%).
CONCLUSIONS: A cell-enabled postpartum remote BP monitoring program was successful in uniformly monitoring BP and capturing hypertension among a diverse, safety-net hospital population.

BACKGROUND: A limited number of studies investigated the association between blood pressure variability (BPV) and cognitive impairment in patients with hypertension. This study aimed to identify the longitudinal association between BPV and cognitive decline and the role of blood pressure (BP) control in this association.
RESULTS: Participants with hypertension from the HRS (Health and Retirement Study), the ELSA (English Longitudinal Study of Ageing), and the CHARLS (China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study) were included. Variation independent of the mean (VIM) was adopted to measure BPV. Cognitive function was measured by standard questionnaires, and a standardized Z score was calculated. Linear mixed-model and restricted cubic splines were adopted to explore the association between BPV and cognitive decline. The study included 4853, 1616, and 1432 eligible patients with hypertension from the HRS, ELSA, and CHARLS, respectively. After adjusting for covariates, per-SD increment of VIM of BP was significantly associated with global cognitive function decline in Z scores in both systolic BP (pooled β, -0.045 [95% CI, -0.065 to -0.029]) and diastolic BP (pooled β, -0.022 [95% CI, -0.040 to -0.004]) among hypertensive patients. Similar inverse associations were observed in patients with hypertension taking antihypertensive drugs and in patients with hypertension with well-controlled BP.
CONCLUSIONS: High BPV was independently associated with a faster cognitive decline among patients with hypertension, even those with antihypertensive medications or well-controlled BP. Further studies are needed to confirm our results and determine whether reducing BPV can prevent or delay cognitive decline.

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。

暂无摘要。