Bland-Altman plot

平淡无奇的奥特曼情节
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:国际标准组织(ISO)建议进行协调,以在体外诊断测量设备(IVD-MD)中获得等效结果。我们旨在评估本研究中创建的Bland-Altman基于图的协调算法(BA-BHA)的有效性,并将其与ISO21151:2020中提出的基于加权Deming回归的协调算法(WD-BHA)进行比较。
    方法:使用80例患者血清作为协调参考材料(HRM)来开发IVD-MD特异性协调算法。另一组40名患者血清用于验证协调算法的有效性。我们比较了回归斜率,拦截,Bland-Altman地块布局,百分比差异,协议限制(LoAs),协调前后的方法间变异系数(CV)。
    结果:经过WD-BHA的协调,在加权戴明回归中观察到测量值和人力资源管理目标之间的可接受斜率和截距,但不是在Passing-Bablok分析中。平均差异为-5.5至5.0%,特定水平的差异为-33.9至23.9%。LoAs为-64.6%至74.6%。方法间CV为22.9%(±12.9%)。然而,经BA-BHA协调后,加权Deming和Passing-Bablok回归方程都给出了协调的结果。平均差异为-0.3至0.2%,特定水平的差异为-1.1至1.6%。LoAs为-23.3至23.2%。方法间CV为8.4%(±4.0%)。在Bland-Altman图中,数据点平均分布在平均值的两侧。
    结论:可以改善不同方法之间的测试结果的不等效性,但就WD-BHA的可接受斜率和截距而言,特定水平的不可接受的分析差异可能被隐藏。新方案BA-BHA可能是优化免疫测定协调的可行替代方案。
    OBJECTIVE: Harmonization has been recommended by the International Organization for Standard (ISO) to achieve equivalent results across in vitro diagnostic measurement devices (IVD-MDs). We aim to evaluate the effectiveness of Bland-Altman plot-based harmonization algorithm (BA-BHA) created in this study and compare it with weighted Deming regression-based harmonization algorithm (WD-BHA) proposed in ISO 21151:2020.
    METHODS: Eighty patient sera were used as the harmonization reference material (HRM) to develop IVD-MD-specific harmonization algorithms. Another panel of 40 patient sera was used to validate the effectiveness of harmonization algorithms. We compared regression slopes, intercepts, Bland-Altman plot layouts, percent differences, limits of agreement (LoAs), between-method coefficients of variation (CV) before and after harmonization.
    RESULTS: After harmonization by WD-BHA, acceptable slopes and intercepts between measured values and HRM targets were observed in weighted Deming regression, but not in Passing-Bablok analysis. Mean differences were -5.5 to 5.0 % and differences at specific levels were -33.9 to 23.9 %. LoAs were -64.6 to 74.6 %. Between-method CV was 22.9 % (±12.9 %). However, after harmonization by BA-BHA, both weighted Deming and Passing-Bablok regressions equations presented harmonized results. Mean differences were -0.3 to 0.2 % and differences at specific levels were -1.1 to 1.6 %. LoAs were -23.3 to 23.2 %. Between-method CV was 8.4 % (±4.0 %). The data points were evenly distributed at both sides of the mean in Bland-Altman plots.
    CONCLUSIONS: The inequivalence of test results between different methods can be improved but unacceptable analytical differences at specific levels may be hidden in terms of an acceptable slope and intercept on WD-BHA. The new protocol BA-BHA may be a viable alternative to optimize the harmonization for immunoassays.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:目前正在使用汉密尔顿和蒙哥马利-奥斯贝格抑郁量表评估重度抑郁症(MDD)的症状。然而,关于这两种量表的比较研究很少。我们的研究旨在确定汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HDRS)和蒙哥马利-奥斯贝格抑郁量表(MADRS)在12周的基线评分之间的相关性。
    方法:正在进行的随机,开放标签,这里描述了三臂研究的中期分析。参与者在基线时使用HDRS和MADRS进行评估,四,八,口服维拉唑酮(20-40mg/d)后12周,艾司西酞普兰(10-20mg/d),或沃替西汀(5-20mg/d)。这项研究在临床试验注册中心进行了前瞻性注册,印度(CTRI/2022/07/043808)。
    结果:在71名招募人员中,49人(69%)完成了为期12周的访问。在基线,三组的HDRS评分中位数分别为30.0、29.5和29.0(p=0.76),12周时,它们降低到19.5、19.5和18.0(p=0.18)。在基线,各组MADRS评分中位数分别为36、36和36(p=0.79);12周时,分别为24、24和23(p=0.03)。Pearson相关性显示,艾司西酞普兰(r=0.70,p=0.002)与沃替西汀(r=0.59,p=0.01)和维拉唑酮(r=0.59,p=0.02)的基线评分变化之间的相关性最强。Bland-Altman分析显示,得分之间的平均差为5.11(95%CI:3.08-7.14)。
    结论:根据这项中期研究,治疗12周后,HDRS和MADRS评分下降。两个分数都有很强的正相关,分数之间的差异随着时间的推移而减小。
    OBJECTIVE: The symptoms of major depressive disorder (MDD) are nowadays being assessed with the Hamilton and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scales. However, there are few studies on the comparison of these two scales. Our study aimed to determine the correlation between the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) and Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) scores at baseline through 12 weeks.
    METHODS: An ongoing randomized, open-label, three-arm study\'s interim analysis is portrayed here. The participants were assessed with HDRS and MADRS at baseline, four, eight, and 12 weeks after receiving oral tablets of either vilazodone (20-40 mg/d), escitalopram (10-20 mg/d), or vortioxetine (5-20 mg/d). This study is prospectively registered with the Clinical Trial Registry, India (CTRI/2022/07/043808).
    RESULTS: Of 71 recruited individuals, 49 (69%) completed the 12-week visit. At baseline, the three groups\' median HDRS scores were 30.0, 29.5, and 29.0 (p=0.76), and at 12 weeks, they reduced to 19.5, 19.5, and 18.0 (p=0.18). At baseline, the group-wise median MADRS scores were 36, 36, and 36 (p=0.79); at 12 weeks, they were 24, 24, and 23 (p=0.03). The Pearson correlation revealed that the association between the changes in scores from baseline was strongest for escitalopram (r=0.70, p=0.002) followed by vortioxetine (r=0.59, p=0.01) and vilazodone (r=0.59, p=0.02). The Bland-Altman analysis showed that the mean difference between the scores was 5.11 (95% CI: 3.08-7.14).
    CONCLUSIONS: According to this interim study, HDRS and MADRS scores declined after 12 weeks of therapy. Both scores had strong positive correlation, and the difference between the scores reduced with time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    中性粒细胞髓过氧化物酶(MPO)是先天免疫系统的必需酶。测量MPO活性对于了解各种疾病中的中性粒细胞特征和功能至关重要。MPO活性可以用几种方法测量,包括分光光度法和荧光法。本文介绍了一种基于硫胺素的H2O2依赖性氧化来专门定量MPO活性的荧光法。我们使用稳健的统计方法响应面方法(RSM)和BoxBenkenDesign(BBD)优化了这种新方法。我们使用RSM方法广泛检查了几个实验参数的影响,并确定了准确和灵敏的MPO活性测量的最佳条件。使用二阶多项式方程的方差分析(ANOVA)确定了最佳条件。得到的F值(4.86)表明该模型是显著的。然而,缺乏适应度F值(1.79)表明它与相应的p值没有显著差异.在最佳条件下获得了最大的MPO活性(30±2UL-1),这是1000µM的H2O2,10分钟的孵育时间,和1000µM的硫胺素。我们的结果表明,这种先进的荧光法具有显著的准确性,灵敏度,和线性可达60IU。新的和标准的比色法也显示出良好的相关性。这些结果表明,新的荧光法可以可靠和有效地评估MPO活性。新方法具有良好的准确性,灵敏度,和线性,使其成为对评估MPO活性感兴趣的研究人员和临床医生的有价值的方案。
    Neutrophil myeloperoxidase (MPO) is an essential enzyme for the innate immune system. Measuring MPO activity is vital for understanding neutrophil characteristics and functions in various diseases. MPO activity can be measured using several methods, including spectrophotometric and fluorometric protocols. This paper introduces a fluorometric method for specifically quantifying MPO activity based on the H2O2-dependent oxidation of thiamine. We optimized this new method using the robust statistical approach response surface methodology (RSM) and Box Benken Design (BBD). We extensively examined the effects of several experimental parameters using the RSM methodology and determined the best conditions for accurate and sensitive MPO activity measurement. The optimal conditions were determined using the analysis of variance (ANOVA) for second-order polynomial equations. The resulting F-value (4.86) indicated that the model was significant. However, the lack-of-fitness F-value (1.79) suggested it did not differ significantly from the corresponding p-value. The greatest MPO activity (30 ± 2 U L-1) was obtained under optimum conditions, which were 1000 µM of H2O2, 10 min incubation time, and 1000 µM of thiamine. Our results suggest that this advanced fluorometric method has significant accuracy, sensitivity, and linearity up to 60 IU. The new and standard colorimetric methods also showed a good correlation. These results indicate that the new fluorometric method can be dependable and efficient for assessing MPO activity. The new method is characterized by excellent accuracy, sensitivity, and linearity, making it a valuable protocol for researchers and clinicians interested in assessing MPO activity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:重要的是,易于使用的措施,如关于身体活动(PA)和久坐行为的主观问题是有效和可靠的,提供准确的措施,当它们被用于健康促进工作,旨在支持人们改善他们的生活习惯,如PA。这项研究的目的是评估结构化访谈表格的并发有效性,该表格估计了自我报告的PA以及在初级卫生保健背景下瑞典有针对性的健康对话中使用的坐下时间的问题。
    方法:该研究在瑞典南部进行。为了评估面试表格的并发有效性,通过访谈表格估计的中等至剧烈的体育锻炼(MVPA)时间和与MVPA相关的能量消耗与ActiGraphGT3X-BT加速度计评估的相同指标进行了比较。要评估一个关于坐着时间的问题,瑞典体育与健康科学学院关于坐位时间的单项目问题(SED-GIH)与activPAL测斜仪的测量进行了比较。统计分析包括得出Bland-Altman图和计算Spearman的等级相关系数。
    结果:Bland-Altman图表明,对于较低的PA水平,自我报告的PA测量值与基于设备的PA测量值之间的差异绝对变化较低,无论是能量消耗还是在MVPA中花费的时间。没有观察到系统性的高估或低估。自我报告和基于设备的PA测量之间的Spearman相关系数在MVPA中花费的时间为0.27(p=0.014),在能量消耗方面为0.26(p=0.022)。单项目问题与基于设备的坐位时间测量之间的相关系数为0.31(p=0.002)。74%的参与者低估了坐着时间。
    结论:PA访谈表格和SED-GIH关于坐着时间的问题可能在初级卫生保健中的有针对性的健康对话中具有价值,旨在支持久坐和身体活动不足的人增加他们的身体活动并限制他们的坐着时间。问卷易于使用,比基于设备的措施更具成本效益,特别是关于在初级卫生保健中为成千上万的参与者进行的基于人群的干预措施,例如有针对性的健康对话。
    背景:不适用。
    BACKGROUND: It is important that easy-to-use measures like subjective questions about physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour are valid and reliable providing accurate measures, when they are used in health promotion work aiming to support people to improve their lifestyle habits such as PA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the concurrent validity of a structured interview form estimating self-reported PA and a question about sitting time used in Swedish targeted health dialogues in the context of primary health care.
    METHODS: The study was conducted in the southern part of Sweden. To evaluate concurrent validity of the interview form, time spent in moderate-to-vigorous physical activities (MVPA) and energy expenditure related to MVPA estimated by an interview form was compared with the same measures assessed by an ActiGraph GT3X-BT accelerometer. To evaluate a question about sitting time, the Swedish School of Sport and Health Sciences\' single-item question about sitting time (SED-GIH) was compared with measures from an activPAL inclinometer. Statistical analyses included deriving Bland‒Altman plots and calculating Spearman\'s rank correlation coefficients.
    RESULTS: Bland‒Altman plots indicated lower absolute variation in the difference between self-reported and device-based PA measures for lower PA levels, both for energy expenditure and time spent in MVPA. No systematic over- or underestimation was observed. The Spearman\'s correlation coefficient between self-reported and device-based PA measures was 0.27 (p = 0.014) for time spent in MVPA and 0.26 (p = 0.022) for energy expenditure. The correlation coefficient between the single item question and device-based sitting time measures was 0.31 (p = 0.002). Sitting time was underestimated by 74% of the participants.
    CONCLUSIONS: The PA interview form and the SED-GIH question on sitting time may be of value in targeted health dialogues in primary health care with the intention to support sedentary and insufficiently physically active persons in increasing their physical activity and limiting their sitting time. The questionnaires are easy to use and are more cost effective than device-based measures, especially regarding population-based interventions conducted in primary health care for thousands of participants such as targeted health dialogues.
    BACKGROUND: Not applicable.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    定量视网膜不同层的光滑度可能是各种病理状况如糖尿病性视网膜病变中的重要且实用的生物标志物。本研究的目的是开发一种自动机器学习算法,该算法使用具有小波核的支持向量回归方法,并自动分割50个光学相干断层扫描(OCT)平板中的两个超反射视网膜层(内网状层(IPL)和外网状层(OPL))并计算平滑度指数(SI)。Bland-Altman的阴谋,平均绝对误差,均方根误差和符号误差计算显示了手动方法之间的适度差异,用作地面真相,以及相应的IPL/OPL自动分割,以及OCT平板中的SI测量。结论是,所构造的算法可以作为一种可靠的,在适当的层中快速方便地分割IPL/OPL和计算SI的方法。
    Quantifying the smoothness of different layers of the retina can potentially be an important and practical biomarker in various pathologic conditions like diabetic retinopathy. The purpose of this study is to develop an automated machine learning algorithm which uses support vector regression method with wavelet kernel and automatically segments two hyperreflective retinal layers (inner plexiform layer (IPL) and outer plexiform layer (OPL)) in 50 optical coherence tomography (OCT) slabs and calculates the smoothness index (SI). The Bland-Altman plots, mean absolute error, root mean square error and signed error calculations revealed a modest discrepancy between the manual approach, used as the ground truth, and the corresponding automated segmentation of IPL/ OPL, as well as SI measurements in OCT slabs. It was concluded that the constructed algorithm may be employed as a reliable, rapid and convenient approach for segmenting IPL/OPL and calculating SI in the appropriate layers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    具有一致性极限的Bland-Altman图已被广泛用作评估两次测量之间的重测可靠性或可重复性的绝对指标。我们已经观察到,在使用相关指数如一致性相关系数(CCC)或类内相关系数的设置中,协议方法的限制可能与缩放指数不一致。特别是,当两个测量结果高度一致,但不知道可接受的差异,并且数据的共同方差很大时,一致性界限的广泛宽度可能表明缺乏一致性。本研究旨在创作一部小说,基于CCC的再现性或可靠性图形评估指南。
    一致性相关系数用于从两次测量中创建100(1-α)%的参考带。模拟研究和真实的例子,包括Bland和Altman论文中的峰值呼气流速数据以及Radiomics研究的测试-重测再现性数据,被实施以评估参考频带的使用。
    在测量之间没有可接受的差异的情况下,我们发现一致性的界限可能与一致性相关系数不一致。我们的模拟研究结果和实际数据应用表明,所提出的方法可以为从业者提供一种新颖的图形评估,该评估与一致性相关系数的结果一致。
    我们提出的新颖的基于缩放指数的指导可用于再现性或可靠性的图形评估,并且可能比使用一致性相关系数的设置中的一致性极限具有优势。
    The Bland-Altman plot with the limits of agreement has been widely used as an absolute index for assessing test-retest reliability or reproducibility between two measurements. We have observed that in the settings where the relative index such as concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) or intraclass correlation coefficient is employed, the limits of agreement approach may be inconsistent with the scaled index. Particularly, the broad width of the limits of agreement may indicate a lack of agreement when the two measurements are highly concordant but an acceptable difference is not known and the common variance of the data is large. This research aims to create a novel, CCC-based guidance for graphical evaluation of reproducibility or reliability.
    The concordance correlation coefficient is used to create a 100(1-α)% reference band from two measurements. Simulation studies and real examples, including the peak expiratory flow rate data in Bland and Altman\'s paper and the test-retest reproducibility data of the Radiomics study, are implemented to assess the use of the reference band.
    In the absence of an acceptable difference between measurements, we found that the limits of agreement may not be consistent with the concordance correlation coefficient. Our simulation study results and real data application show that the proposed method can provide practitioners with a novel graphical evaluation that is consistent with results from the concordance correlation coefficient.
    Our proposed novel scaled index-based guidance can be used for the graphical evaluation of reproducibility or reliability and may have advantages over the limits of agreement in settings where the concordance correlation coefficient is employed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    对当前生活方式的智能分析可能有助于理解慢性病的发展以及这些疾病的关系。有可能减少或预防这些疾病的发展。在这项工作中,介绍了一种新的智能方法,并将其应用于2型糖尿病的早期检测。智能分析主要取决于评估危及生命的状况(肥胖,高血压,吸烟状况,饮酒状况和体育活动水平低)从语言变量中提取知识,并设计一种新的认知工具来辅助预测过程。该方法包括三个阶段:在第一阶段,数据来自100名健康志愿者,其中包括对危及生命的状况的评估。第二阶段是实施用于2型糖尿病早期预测的模糊模型。基于Bland-Altman图的分析,将提议技术的预测血糖值与平均空腹血糖值进行比较。此外,模糊系统模型具有优异的结果(准确度=81%,精度=0.57%,召回率=0.83%)。
    Intelligent analysis of present lifestyle may help to understand the development of the chronic diseases and the relationship of these diseases together. It is possible to reduce or prevent the development of these diseases. In this work, a novel intelligent method is introduced and applied for early detection of type 2 diabetic. Intelligent analysis depends mainly on evaluation life-threatening conditions (obesity, hypertension, smoking status, alcohol drinking status and low level of physical activities) to extract knowledge from linguistic variablesand design a new cognitive tool to assist in the prediction process.This method consists from three stages: in the first stage, data was collected from 100 healthy volunteers, which includes evaluations of life-threatening conditions. The second stage is implementation of fuzzy model for early prediction of type 2 diabetes. Predicted blood glucose values of proposal technique were compared with average fasting blood glucose values based on analysis of Bland-Altman plot. Furthermore, fuzzy system model presents superior results (accuracy = 81%, precision = 0.57% and recall = 0.83%).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究旨在通过评估上一代(Allura)和升级(Azurion)血管造影系统的辐射剂量测量来降低接受子宫动脉栓塞(UAE)的患者的辐射剂量。由于基于不同的血管造影系统和辐射剂量预测变量,文献中先前的UAE回归模型无法应用于该中心的实践。这项研究的目的是确定升级后的血管造影系统是否降低了辐射剂量,并开发了一个回归模型来确定升级后的血管造影系统特有的辐射剂量的预测因子。第一组(Allura,n=95)和II组(Azurion,n=95)证明了角质面积乘积(KAP)和Ka的显着减少,r(参考空气角力)降低了63%(143.2Gycm2vs52.9Gycm2;P<0.001,d=0.8)和67%(0.6Gyvs0.2Gy;P<0.001,d=0.8),分别。多变量线性回归(MLR)模型将升级后的血管造影系统上KAP的UAE辐射剂量预测因子确定为总透视剂量,Ka,r,和总子宫体积。使用Bland-Altman图评估MLR模型的预测准确性。平均差为0.39Gycm2,一致极限为28.49和-27.71Gycm2,因此没有成比例的偏差。所得的MLR模型被认为是系统依赖性的,并验证了升级的血管造影系统及其先进的功能,以显着降低辐射剂量。介入放射科医师和介入放射技师对系统特征的熟悉以及新建立的MLR模型的实施将进一步促进使用升级的血管造影系统进行UAE手术的所有中心的剂量优化。
    This study sought to achieve radiation dose reductions for patients receiving uterine artery embolisation (UAE) by evaluating radiation dose measurements for the preceding generation (Allura) and upgraded (Azurion) angiography system. Previous UAE regression models in the literature could not be applied to this centre\'s practice due to being based on different angiography systems and radiation dose predictor variables. The aims of this study were to establish whether radiation dose is reduced with the upgraded angiography system and to develop a regression model to determine predictors of radiation dose specific to the upgraded angiography system. A comparison between Group I (Allura,n= 95) and Group II (Azurion,n= 95) demonstrated a significant reduction in kerma-area product (KAP) and Ka, r (reference air kerma) by 63% (143.2 Gy cm2vs 52.9 Gy cm2;P< 0.001,d= 0.8) and 67% (0.6 Gy vs 0.2 Gy;P< 0.001,d= 0.8), respectively. The multivariable linear regression (MLR) model identified the UAE radiation dose predictors for KAP on the upgraded angiography system as total fluoroscopy dose, Ka, r, and total uterus volume. The predictive accuracy of the MLR model was assessed using a Bland-Altman plot. The mean difference was 0.39 Gy cm2and the limits of agreement were +28.49 and -27.71 Gy cm2, and thus illustrated no proportional bias. The resultant MLR model was considered system-dependent and validated the upgraded angiography system and its advance capabilities to significantly reduce radiation dose. Interventional radiologist and interventional radiographer familiarisation of the system\'s features and the implementation of the newly established MLR model would further facilitate dose optimisation for all centres performing UAE procedures using the upgraded angiography system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    提出了不相关平均效应(UME)模型,用于评估干预网络中全球一致性假设。然而,UME模型不能适当地适应多臂试验,并且省略了在2臂试验中未调查的多臂试验中的非基线干预措施之间的比较.
    我们提出了解决上述限制的UME模型的改进。我们还在网络荟萃分析(NMA)和UME模型下使用Bland-Altman图进行了试验组的后平均偏差贡献的散点图,以检测导致模型拟合不良的外围试验。我们将完善的原始UME模型应用于2个具有多臂试验的网络。
    原始的UME模型在两个网络中省略了超过20%的观察到的比较。使用互补图对各个数据点的偏差贡献进行了彻底检查,并结合了模型拟合的度量和试验间方差的估计,表明完善的和原始的UME模型在两个示例中都显示出可能的不一致。完善的UME模型允许多臂试验的适当调整和所有观察到的证据在复杂的干预网络的可视化。此外,考虑几个互补的地块来调查偏差有助于得出关于网络中全球不一致的可能性的知情结论。
    我们改进了不相关的平均效应(UME)模型,以适当地纳入多臂试验,并在复杂的干预网络中估计所有观察到的比较。在网络荟萃分析和完善的UME模型下对所有观察到的比较进行事后总结的森林地块可以揭示网络中潜在不一致性的后果。使用互补图来调查各个数据点的偏差贡献,并结合模型拟合措施和估计的异质性有助于检测可能的不一致性。
    The unrelated mean effects (UME) model has been proposed for evaluating the consistency assumption globally in the network of interventions. However, the UME model does not accommodate multiarm trials properly and omits comparisons between nonbaseline interventions in the multiarm trials not investigated in 2-arm trials.
    We proposed a refinement of the UME model that tackles the limitations mentioned above. We also accompanied the scatterplots on the posterior mean deviance contributions of the trial arms under the network meta-analysis (NMA) and UME models with Bland-Altman plots to detect outlying trials contributing to poor model fit. We applied the refined and original UME models to 2 networks with multiarm trials.
    The original UME model omitted more than 20% of the observed comparisons in both networks. The thorough inspection of the individual data points\' deviance contribution using complementary plots in conjunction with the measures of model fit and the estimated between-trial variance indicated that the refined and original UME models revealed possible inconsistency in both examples.
    The refined UME model allows proper accommodation of the multiarm trials and visualization of all observed evidence in complex networks of interventions. Furthermore, considering several complementary plots to investigate deviance helps draw informed conclusions on the possibility of global inconsistency in the network.
    We have refined the unrelated mean effects (UME) model to incorporate multiarm trials properly and to estimate all observed comparisons in complex networks of interventions.Forest plots with posterior summaries of all observed comparisons under the network meta-analysis and refined UME model can uncover the consequences of potential inconsistency in the network.Using complementary plots to investigate the individual data points\' deviance contribution in conjunction with model fit measures and estimated heterogeneity aid in detecting possible inconsistency.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景技术智能手机技术正在迅速发展和进步,其中许多提供用于血氧测定的健康应用,包括SamsungHealth/SHealth应用程序。测量血氧饱和度是监测COVID-19患者以及其他健康状况的重要指标之一。这些应用可用于测量氧饱和度,为临床决策提供便捷的解决方案。方法使用具有传感器和相机闪光灯的三星Galaxy智能手机的三星健康应用程序以及低成本便携式数字显示器(液晶显示器(LCD))手指脉搏血氧计收集氧饱和度测量值。建立了会内可靠性,以确定措施之间的一致性。类内相关系数(ICCs)用两种方法报告的95%置信区间(CI)计算。Bland-Altman图用于比较两种测量方法之间的一致性水平。结果脉搏血氧计与三星健康应用测量值的平均差异有统计学意义(t125=4.407,p<0.001),平均而言,脉搏血氧计测量值比三星健康应用测量值高0.510点(95%CI=0.281-0.740)。脉搏血氧计和SamsungHealth应用评分中度相关(r=0.462)。会话内可靠性测试的结果产生了0.557的可接受的ICC值,表明两种方法测量氧饱和度的可靠性中等且结果一致。Bland-Altman图显示了散布在零上和零下的数据点的一致均匀分布。结论智能手机健康应用可以适度可靠地测量血氧饱和度。
    Background Smartphone technology is rapidly evolving and advancing, with many of them offering health applications being used for oximetry purposes, including the Samsung Health/S Health application. Measuring oxygen saturation is one of the important indications to monitor patients with COVID-19, as well as other health conditions. These applications can be used for measuring oxygen saturation to provide a convenient solution for clinical decisions. Methods Oxygen saturation measurements were collected using the Samsung Health application for Samsung Galaxy smartphone with a sensor and camera flash and a low-cost portable digital display (liquid crystal display (LCD)) finger pulse oximeter. Intra-session reliability was established to determine the consistency between the measures. Intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) reported for both methods. The Bland-Altman plot was used to compare the level of agreement between the two measurement methods. Results There was a statistically significant average difference between pulse oximeter and Samsung Health application measurements (t125 = 4.407, p < 0.001), and on average, pulse oximeter measurement was 0.510 points higher than Samsung Health application measurement (95% CI = 0.281-0.740). The pulse oximeter and Samsung Health application scores were moderately correlated (r = 0.462). The results of the intra-session reliability test produced an acceptable ICC value of 0.557, indicating moderate reliability and consistent results for the measurement of oxygen saturation with both methods. The Bland-Altman plot showed a consistently equal distribution of data points scattered above and below zero. Conclusion Smartphone health applications can be used with moderate reliability to measure oxygen saturation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号