Bile duct injury

胆管损伤
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:严格的安全性(CVS)对于确保安全的腹腔镜胆囊切除术很重要。当CVS是不可能的,进行胆囊次全切除术.在考虑胆囊次全切除术时,外科医生通常关心的是防止胆囊管的胆漏。急性胆囊炎的胆囊次全切除术的两种主要类型是开窗和重建。以前,这两个没有选择标准;因此,进行开放转换。这项研究旨在评估我们以目标为导向的方法,以选择开窗或重建急性胆囊炎的胆囊次全切除术。
    方法:我们在2019年4月推出了面向目标的方法。在介绍这种方法之前,急性胆囊炎的腹腔镜胆囊切除术无胆囊次全切除术标准。我们的方法引入后,根据大部胆囊切除术标准对急性胆囊炎进行腹腔镜胆囊切除术。我们回顾性回顾了2015年至2021年间因急性胆囊炎而接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者的病历。腹腔镜胆囊切除术治疗急性胆囊炎由外科医生进行,无论他们是新手还是退伍军人。
    结果:从2015年4月到2019年3月的时期是在我们的方法引入(BI)之前,从2019年4月到2021年12月的时期是在我们的方法引入(AI)之后。在BI和AI期间有177和186例急性胆囊炎患者,分别。两组在术前特征方面无显著差异,手术时间,和失血。组间腹腔镜胆囊次全切除率无差异(10.2%[BI]vs.[AI]13.9%;p=0.266)。BI期间的开放转化率明显高于AI期间(7.4%vs.1.6%;p=0.015)。
    结论:我们的目标导向方法是可行的,安全,许多外科医生容易理解。
    BACKGROUND: A critical view of safety (CVS) is important to ensure safe laparoscopic cholecystectomy. When the CVS is not possible, subtotal cholecystectomy is performed. While considering subtotal cholecystectomy, surgeons are often concerned about preventing bile leakage from the cystic ducts. The two main types of subtotal cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis are fenestrating and reconstituting. Previously, there were no selection criteria for these two; therefore, open conversion was performed. This study aimed to evaluate our goal-oriented approach to choose fenestrating or reconstituting subtotal cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis.
    METHODS: We introduced our goal-oriented approach in April 2019. Before introducing this approach, laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was performed without criteria for subtotal cholecystectomy. After our approach was introduced, laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was performed according to the subtotal cholecystectomy criteria. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis between 2015 and 2021. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis was performed by surgeons regardless of whether they were novices or veterans.
    RESULTS: The period from April 2015 to March 2019 was before the introduction (BI) of our approach, the period from April 2019 to December 2021 was after the introduction (AI) of our approach. There were 177 and 186 patients with acute cholecystitis during the BI and AI periods, respectively. There were no significant differences between groups in terms of preoperative characteristics, operative time, and blood loss. No difference in the laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy rate between groups (10.2% [BI] vs. 13.9% [AI]; p = 0.266) was obserbed. The open conversion rate during the BI period was significantly higher than that during the AI period (7.4% vs. 1.6%; p = 0.015).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our goal-oriented approach is feasible, safe, and easy for many surgeons to understand.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胆管损伤(BDIs)是胆囊切除术的严重并发症。严重损伤后形成的狭窄最终需要手术修复。本研究旨在分析我们在胆囊切除术后胆管狭窄(PCBS)手术修复方面的经验。
    方法:对2013年1月至2020年3月期间接受PCBS手术修复的患者进行回顾性分析。使用铋系统对狭窄进行分类。使用Hepp-Couinaud技术进行Roux-en-Y肝空肠吻合术的延迟修复。结果根据麦当劳的标准进行分级。进行统计分析以确定影响结果的因素。
    结果:68例患者接受了PCBS修复。45名患者在一个月内出现,8名患者在六个月后出现。出现的症状是黄疸,外胆瘘,胆汁瘤,胆管炎和腹膜炎。两名患者存在门静脉高压症。最终修复的中位间隔为22周。平均住院时间为9.5天。18例患者出现术后并发症。一名患者由于无法纠正的凝血病而导致术后死亡。中位随访时间为54个月,61例(90%)患者获得了成功结局.四名患者有两个明显的吻合口狭窄,四,修复后的五年和八年。门静脉高压症和术后并发症是与不良预后相关的变量。
    结论:胆囊切除术后的BDI是一种毁灭性的并发症。通过早期识别并及时转诊到三级护理中心,遵循标准化的胆道重建技术,对胆道狭窄进行手术修复可获得持久的长期结果。
    BACKGROUND: Bile duct injuries (BDIs) are a serious complication of cholecystectomy. Strictures that form after major injuries ultimately require surgical repair. This study aimed to analyse our experience with the surgical repair of post-cholecystectomy biliary strictures (PCBS).
    METHODS: Patients who underwent surgical repair for PCBS between January 2013 and March 2020 were retrospectively reviewed. The strictures were classified using the Bismuth system. Delayed repair with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy was performed using the Hepp-Couinaud technique. Outcomes were graded according to McDonald\'s criteria. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors influencing the outcomes.
    RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients underwent repair for PCBS. Forty-five patients presented within one month and eight patients presented late after six months. Presenting symptoms were jaundice, external biliary fistula, biliomas, cholangitis and peritonitis. Portal hypertension was present in two patients. The median interval for definitive repair was 22 weeks. The median hospital stay was 9.5 days. Eighteen patients had postoperative complications. One patient had postoperative mortality due to uncorrectable coagulopathy. With a median follow-up of 54 months, successful outcomes were achieved in 61 (90%) patients. Four patients had anastomotic strictures evident at two, four, five and eight years after repair. Portal hypertension and postoperative complications were the variables associated with poor outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: BDIs following cholecystectomy are a devastating complication. Surgical repair for biliary strictures yields durable long-term outcomes with early identification and timely referral to a tertiary care centre where standardized techniques for biliary reconstruction are followed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    假设胆管再生可以预防胆管狭窄,肝移植后发病的主要原因。评估胆道再生能力可以确定目前正在下降的移植物适合移植。但直到现在都不可行。这项研究使用长期原位常温机灌注(LT-NMP)评估胆道再生。拒绝移植的人肝脏在36°C下灌注长达13.5天。胆管活检,在整个灌注过程中收集胆汁和灌注液,检查了损伤和再生的特征。胆道再生定义为严重损伤后新的Ki-67阳性胆道上皮。灌注十个肝脏,中位持续时间为7.5天。所有移植物均发生严重胆管损伤,70%的移植物发生胆道再生。传统的胆道生物标志物如胆汁葡萄糖在灌注过程中改善,但与胆道再生无关(p>0.05)。相比之下,胆汁中IL-6和VEGF-A水平的维持与胆汁再生相关(两种细胞因子p=0.017).这是第一个证明LT-NMP期间胆道再生的研究,并确定胆汁中的细胞因子特征作为LT-NMP期间胆道再生的新型生物标志物。
    Bile duct regeneration is hypothesised to prevent biliary strictures, a leading cause of morbidity after liver transplantation. Assessing the capacity for biliary regeneration may identify grafts as suitable for transplantation that are currently declined, but has been unfeasible until now. This study used Long-Term Ex-Situ Normothermic Machine Perfusion (LT-NMP) to assess biliary regeneration. Human livers that were declined for transplantation were perfused at 36°C for up to 13.5 days. Bile duct biopsies, bile and perfusate were collected throughout perfusion, which were examined for features of injury and regeneration. Biliary regeneration was defined as new Ki-67 positive biliary epithelium following severe injury. Ten livers were perfused for a median duration of 7.5 days. Severe bile duct injury occurred in all grafts, and biliary regeneration occurred in 70% of grafts. Traditional biomarkers of biliary viability such as bile glucose improved during perfusion but this was not associated with biliary regeneration (p>0.05). In contrast, the maintenance of IL-6 and VEGF-A levels in bile were associated with biliary regeneration (p=0.017 for both cytokines). This is the first study to demonstrate biliary regeneration during LT-NMP and identify a cytokine signature in bile as a novel biomarker for biliary regeneration during LT-NMP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胆管损伤(BDI)修复手术通常与发病率/死亡率相关。中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率(NLR)可轻松评估患者的炎症状态。该研究旨在确定术前NLR(pNLR)与BDI修复手术术后结果之间的可能关系。
    方法:批准的伦理学/研究委员会回顾性研究,在接受Bismuth-StrasbergE型BDI修复(2008-2023)的患者中。登记的数据是:发病率,死亡率,和长期结局(原发性通畅性和原发性通畅性丧失)(Kaplan-Meier)。群体比较(UMann-Whitney),受试者操作特征(ROC):曲线下面积[AUC];临界值,和尤登指数[J],和logistic回归分析用于pNLR评估。
    结果:研究了73例患者。平均年龄为44.4岁。E2是最常见的BDI(38.4%)。围手术期发病率/死亡率分别为31.5%和1.4%。原发性通畅率为95.9%。8.2%的人失去了主要通畅性(3年精算通畅性:85.3%)。有任何并发症的患者pNLR中位数较高(4.84vs.2.89p=0.015),胆道并发症(5.29vs.2.86p=0.01),和原发性通畅性丧失的患者(5.22vs.3.1p=0.08)。AUC\'s,临界值和(J)是:任何并发症(0.678,pNLR=4.3,J=0.38,p=0.007),严重并发症(0.667,pNLR=4.3,J=0.34,p=0.04),胆道并发症(0.712,pNLR=3.64,J=0.46,p=0.001),和原发性通畅性丧失(0.716,pNLR=3.24,J=0.52,p=0.008)。Logistic回归对任何并发症都有显著意义(Exp[B]:0.1,p=0.002),严重并发症(实验[B]:0.2,p=0.03),和胆道并发症(Exp[B]:8.1,p=0.003)。
    结论:pNLR与BDI修复并发症相关,具有中等至可接受的预测能力。pNLR可能预测BDI修复的通畅性。
    BACKGROUND: Bile duct injury (BDI) repair surgery is usually associated with morbidity/mortality. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) easily assesses a patient\'s inflammatory status. The study aims to determine the possible relationship between preoperative NLR (pNLR) with postoperative outcomes in BDI repair surgery.
    METHODS: Approved Ethics/Research Committee retrospective study, in patients who had a Bismuth-Strasberg type E BDI repair (2008-2023). Data registered was: morbidity, mortality, and long-term outcomes (primary patency and loss of primary patency) (Kaplan-Meier). Group comparison (U Mann-Whitney), receiver operator characteristic (ROC): area under curve [AUC]; cut-off value, and Youden index [J], and logistic regression analysis were used for pNLR evaluation.
    RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were studied. Mean age was 44.4 years. E2 was the commonest BDI (38.4%). Perioperative morbidity/mortality was 31.5% and 1.4%. Primary patency was 95.9%. 8.2% have lost primary patency (3-year actuarial patency: 85.3%). Median pNLR was higher in patients who had any complication (4.84 vs. 2.89 p = 0.015), biliary complications (5.29 vs. 2.86 p = 0.01), and patients with loss of primary patency (5.22 vs. 3.1 p = 0.08). AUC\'s, cut-off values and (J) were: any complication (0.678, pNLR = 4.3, J = 0.38, p = 0.007), serious complication (0.667, pNLR = 4.3, J = 0.34, p = 0.04), biliary complications (0.712, pNLR = 3.64, J = 0.46, p = 0.001), and loss of primary patency (0.716, pNLR = 3.24, J = 0.52, p = 0.008). Logistic regression was significant in any complication (Exp [B]: 0.1, p = 0.002), serious complications (Exp [B]: 0.2, p = 0.03), and biliary complications (Exp [B]: 8.1, p = 0.003).
    CONCLUSIONS: pNLR is associated with complications in BDI repair with moderate to acceptable predictive capacity. pNLR could potentially predict patency of a BDI repair.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估在英国(UK)机器人肝胰胆管(HPB)培训计划中进行的机器人胆囊切除术的安全性。
    方法:对来自参加英国机器人HPB培训计划的11个中心的前瞻性收集数据进行了回顾性评估。考虑了所有因症状性胆囊结石或胆囊息肉而接受机器人胆囊切除术的成年患者。胆管损伤,转换为开放程序,转换为胆囊大部切除术,住院时间,30天重新入学,术后并发症是评估的结果参数。
    结果:共纳入600例患者。中位年龄为53(IQR65-41)岁,大多数(72.7%;436/600)为女性。机器人胆囊切除术的主要指征是胆绞痛(55.5%,333/600),胆囊炎(18.8%,113/600),胆囊息肉(7.7%,46/600),和胰腺炎(6.2%,37/600)。中位住院时间为0(IQR0-1)天。在纳入的患者中,手术当天出院率为88.5%(531/600),30天再次入院率为5.5%(33/600)。无胆管损伤,中转开腹率为0.8%(5/600),胆囊次全切除术率为0.8%(5/600)。
    结论:目前的研究证实,机器人胆囊切除术可以安全地用于常规手术,胆管损伤的风险较低,胆漏率低,低转换为开放手术,对胆囊次全切除术的需求较低。
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety profile of robotic cholecystectomy performed within the United Kingdom (UK) Robotic Hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) training programme.
    METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of prospectively collected data from eleven centres participating in the UK Robotic HPB training programme was conducted. All adult patients undergoing robotic cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallstone disease or gallbladder polyp were considered. Bile duct injury, conversion to open procedure, conversion to subtotal cholecystectomy, length of hospital stay, 30-day re-admission, and post-operative complications were the evaluated outcome parameters.
    RESULTS: A total of 600 patients were included. The median age was 53 (IQR 65-41) years and the majority (72.7%; 436/600) were female. The main indications for robotic cholecystectomy were biliary colic (55.5%, 333/600), cholecystitis (18.8%, 113/600), gallbladder polyps (7.7%, 46/600), and pancreatitis (6.2%, 37/600). The median length of stay was 0 (IQR 0-1) days. Of the included patients, 88.5% (531/600) were discharged on the day of procedure with 30-day re-admission rate of 5.5% (33/600). There were no bile duct injuries and the rate of conversion to open was 0.8% (5/600) with subtotal cholecystectomy rate of 0.8% (5/600).
    CONCLUSIONS: The current study confirms that robotic cholecystectomy can be safely implemented to routine practice with a low risk of bile duct injury, low bile leak rate, low conversion to open surgery, and low need for subtotal cholecystectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胆囊切除术是执行最多的外科手术之一。尽管手术安全,庞大的手术量导致胆囊切除术后并发症的发生率显着。此类并发症的早期和准确诊断对于及时有效的治疗至关重要。成像技术对此至关重要,有助于区分预期的术后变化和真正的并发症。这篇综述强调了胆囊切除术适应症的最新知识,相关的手术解剖和手术技术,以及对可能使手术复杂化的解剖学变异的认识。本文还概述了各种成像方式在识别并发症中的作用,手术后可能发生的解剖变化,以及这些发现的含义。此外,我们探索胆囊切除术后可能出现的一系列并发症,比如胆道系统损伤,胆结石相关问题,血管并发症,以及术后集合的形成。放射科医师应善于识别正常和异常的术后发现,以有效指导患者管理。
    Cholecystectomy is one of the most performed surgical procedures. The safety of this surgery notwithstanding, the sheer volume of operations results in a notable incidence of post-cholecystectomy complications. Early and accurate diagnosis of such complications is essential for timely and effective management. Imaging techniques are critical for this purpose, aiding in distinguishing between expected postsurgical changes and true complications. This review highlights current knowledge on the indications for cholecystectomy, pertinent surgical anatomy and surgical technique, and the recognition of anatomical variants that may complicate surgery. The article also outlines the roles of various imaging modalities in identifying complications, the spectrum of possible postsurgical anatomical changes, and the implications of such findings. Furthermore, we explore the array of complications that can arise post-cholecystectomy, such as biliary system injuries, gallstone-related issues, vascular complications, and the formation of postsurgical collections. Radiologists should be adept at identifying normal and abnormal postoperative findings to guide patient management effectively.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)是最常见的手术之一,被认为是胆石症的标准治疗方法。然而,它与胆管或肝动脉损伤的风险有关。这项研究通过实现安全(CVS)的批判性视图和Rouviere沟(RS)的识别来评估LC的安全性和转化率(CR)。这是一项单组队列研究,包括在SmartHealthTower(Sulaimani,伊拉克)从2021年1月到2023年1月。这些数据是前瞻性地从医院数据库中的患者资料或手术记录中收集的。共有419名患者接受了LC,其中女性占主导地位(78.5%)。病例的平均年龄和中位数分别为46.3±15.8和45岁,在2-90年的范围内,分别。最常见的手术指征是胆绞痛(69.5%),其次是急性胆囊炎(23.9%)。与CVS(63.7±27.7分钟)或RS(50.7±21.7分钟)相比,实现CVS(45.6±17.9分钟)或RS识别(45.6±18.6分钟)的病例的手术时间明显缩短。同时具有CVS成就和RS鉴定的患者的手术耗时(44.3±17.6)也明显少于同行(53.3±22.6)。在无CVS成就或RS识别的病例中(n=97,23%),八人(8.2%)有粘连,12(12.4%)的胆囊扩张(GB)和10(10.3%)的GB壁厚。此外,四名(4.1%)经历了GB穿孔,2例(2.1%)出血,1例(1%)结石溢出。没有转换。CVS的实现和RS的识别是执行安全LC和降低CR的实用标志。
    Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is one of the most commonly performed surgeries and is considered the standard treatment for cholelithiasis. However, it is associated with a risk of bile duct or hepatic artery injuries. This study evaluated the safety of LCs and the conversion rate (CR) by achieving a critical view of safety (CVS) and identification of Rouviere\'s sulcus (RS). This was a single-group cohort study that included consecutive patients undergoing LC at Smart Health Tower (Sulaimani, Iraq) from January 2021 to January 2023. The data were prospectively collected from patients\' profiles or surgical notes within the hospital\'s database. A total of 419 patients underwent LC, of which females were the predominant gender (78.5%). The mean and median ages of the cases were 46.3±15.8 and 45 years, with a range of 2-90 years, respectively. The most common indications for surgery were biliary colic (69.5%), followed by acute cholecystitis (23.9%). The duration of the operations was significantly shorter for cases in which the CVS (45.6±17.9 min) or identification of RS (45.6±18.6 min) was achieved compared to those where the CVS (63.7±27.7 min) or RS (50.7±21.7 min) was not observed. Surgeries for patients with both CVS achievement and RS identification were also significantly less time-consuming (44.3±17.6) than counterparts (53.3±22.6). Among the cases without CVS achievement or RS identification (n=97, 23%), eight (8.2%) had adhesions, 12 (12.4%) had a distended gallbladder (GB) and 10 (10.3%) had thick GB walls. In addition, four (4.1%) experienced GB perforation, two (2.1%) had bleeding and one (1%) had stone spillage. There was no conversion. The achievement of CVS and identification of RS are practical landmarks in performing safe LC and decreasing the CR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    标准腹腔镜胆囊切除术(SLC)的替代方法是“眼底优先”方法(FFLC)。有人担心FFLC会导致对重要解剖结构的误解,因此引起比SLC更严重的并发症。由于FFLC通常在复杂情况下用作救援程序,因此方法之间的比较变得复杂。为了避免与此相关的混淆,我们进行了一项基于人群的研究,并对外科医生水平进行了比较。
    在GallRiks中,瑞典胆囊手术登记处,我们将2006-2020年进行的所有胆囊切除术分为三组:在<20%的病例中使用FFLC的外科医生进行的手术(N=150,119),在20-79%的病例(N=10,212)和80%或更多的病例(N=3176)中。我们用逻辑回归比较各组,适应性,年龄,手术经验,手术年份和急性胆囊炎病史。所有手术并发症(出血,胆囊穿孔,内脏穿孔,感染,和胆管损伤)作为结果。关于操作时间进行单独的分析。
    两组间所有手术并发症或胆管损伤的发生率无差异。“眼底优先>80%”组出血率(OR0.34[0.14-0.86])和胆囊穿孔率(OR0.61[0.45-0.82])明显较低,手术时间较短(OR0.76[0.69-0.83])。
    在这项研究中,包括>160,000例胆囊切除术,发现这两种方法同样安全。
    在腹腔镜胆囊切除术中,标准的解剖方法和眼底首次解剖是同样安全的手术技术。外科医生需要学习这两种方法,以便能够使用最适合每个病例的方法。
    UNASSIGNED: An alternative method to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC) is the \"fundus first\" method (FFLC). Concerns have been raised that FFLC can lead to misinterpretation of important anatomical structures, thus causing complications of a more serious kind than SLC. Comparisons between the methods are complicated by the fact that FFLC is often used as a rescue procedure in complicated cases. To avoid confounding related to this we conducted a population-based study with comparisons on the surgeon level.
    UNASSIGNED: In GallRiks, the Swedish registry for Gallbladder surgery, we stratified all cholecystectomies performed 2006-2020 in three groups: surgeries carried out by surgeons that uses FFLC in <20 % of the cases (N = 150,119), in 20-79 % of the cases (N = 10,212) and in 80 % or more of the cases (N = 3176). We compared the groups with logistic regression, adjusting for sex, age, surgical experience, year of surgery and history of acute cholecystitis. All surgical complications (bleeding, gallbladder perforation, visceral perforation, infection, and bile duct injury) were included as outcome. A separate analysis was done with regards to operation time.
    UNASSIGNED: No difference in incidence of all surgical complications or bile duct injury were seen between groups. The rates of bleeding (OR 0.34 [0.14-0.86]) and gallbladder perforation (OR 0.61 [0.45-0.82]) were significantly lower in the \"fundus first > 80% group\" and the operative time was shorter (OR 0.76 [0.69-0.83]).
    UNASSIGNED: In this study including >160,000 cholecystectomies, both methods was found to be equally safe.
    UNASSIGNED: During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the standard method of dissection and fundus first dissection are equally safe surgical techniques. Surgeons need to learn both methods to be able to use the one most appropriate for each individual case.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    腹腔镜胆囊切除术(LC)仍然是成人和儿科人群中最常用的手术之一。尽管术中胆道解剖识别取得了进展,LC期间医源性胆管损伤是一种致命的并发症,对医疗保健系统构成经济负担。已经提出了一系列预防胆管损伤的方法,其中使用吲哚菁绿(ICG)荧光。最常报道的ICG注射方法是静脉给药,而文献缺乏对直接膀胱内ICG注射的研究。这篇叙述性的迷你评论旨在评估潜在的应用,有用性,以及LC中膀胱内ICG荧光的局限性。作者筛选了现有的国际文献,以确定微创胆囊切除术中膀胱内ICG荧光成像的报道,以及有关其使用的特殊问题。文献检索检索到四项前瞻性队列研究,三项病例对照研究,一份病例报告。在选择的三项病例对照研究中,在白光下将膀胱内近红外胆管造影(NIRC)与标准LC进行了比较,静脉给药ICG用于NIRC和标准术中胆道造影(IOC)。总的来说,文献中报道的133例患者在LC期间接受了膀胱内ICG给药进行胆道标测。文献包括几个关于膀胱内ICG给药的报道,但是还没有建立标准化的技术。发表的数据表明,NIRC与膀胱内ICG注射是一种有前途的方法来实现胆道标测。国际奥委会的压倒性限制,包括干预和辐射暴露,以及静脉ICG荧光所需的高肝实质信号和时间间隔。关于膀胱内ICG荧光在LC中的作用的循证指南需要对进一步研究进行评估,并将多中心数据收集到大型注册表中。
    Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) remains one of the most commonly performed procedures in adult and paediatric populations. Despite the advances made in intraoperative biliary anatomy recognition, iatrogenic bile duct injuries during LC represent a fatal complication and consist an economic burden for healthcare systems. A series of methods have been proposed to prevent bile duct injury, among them the use of indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence. The most commonly reported method of ICG injection is the intravenous administration, while literature is lacking studies investigating the direct intragallbladder ICG injection. This narrative mini-review aims to assess the potential applications, usefulness, and limitations of intragallbladder ICG fluorescence in LC. Authors screened the available international literature to identify the reports of intragallbladder ICG fluorescence imaging in minimally invasive cholecystectomy, as well as special issues regarding its use. Literature search retrieved four prospective cohort studies, three case-control studies, and one case report. In the three case-control studies selected, intragallbladder near-infrared cholangiography (NIRC) was compared with standard LC under white light, with intravenous administration of ICG for NIRC and with standard intraoperative cholangiography (IOC). In total, 133 patients reported in the literature have been administered intragallbladder ICG administration for biliary mapping during LC. Literature includes several reports of intragallbladder ICG administration, but a standardized technique has not been established yet. Published data suggest that NIRC with intragallbladder ICG injection is a promising method to achieve biliary mapping, overwhelming limitations of IOC including intervention and radiation exposure, as well as the high hepatic parenchyma signal and time interval needed in intravenous ICG fluorescence. Evidence-based guidelines on the role of intragallbladder ICG fluorescence in LC require the assessment of further studies and multicenter data collection into large registries.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:良性胆道疾病(BBD)是一种常见的疾病,涉及由于非恶性原因需要肝外胆管切除和重建的患者。
    方法:这项研究追踪了2015年至2023年接受BBD胆道切除术的所有患者。我们排除了患有恶性疾病的患者和进行“开放”手术的患者。根据病人的解剖结构,采用的程序是机器人Roux-en-Y肝空肠吻合术(RYHJ)或机器人胆总管十二指肠吻合术(CDD)。
    结果:从研究的33名患者中,23是女性,10个是男性。麻醉学(ASA)等级为3±0.5;MELD评分为9±4.1;Child-Pugh评分为6±1.7。接受手术的主要适应症包括医源性胆管损伤,胆道狭窄,和1型胆总管囊肿。平均手术时间约为272分钟,平均失血量为79mL。术后,三名患者经历了重大并发症,都是吻合口泄漏造成的.平均住院时间为4天,30天内再入院率为15%。平均随访33个月,1例患者由于狭窄在18个月时不得不进行翻修.这需要进一步的导管切除和再吻合。值得注意的是,没有肝切除术的报道,没有转换到\'open\'方法,术中无并发症,没有死亡。
    结论:机器人肝外胆管切除和重建与Roux-en-Y肝空肠吻合术或胆总管十二指肠吻合术是安全的,术后发病率可接受。住院时间短,中期随访,术后狭窄率低。
    Benign biliary disease (BBD) is a prevalent condition involving patients who require extrahepatic bile duct resections and reconstructions due to nonmalignant causes.
    This study followed all patients who underwent biliary resections for BBD between 2015 and 2023. We excluded those with malignant conditions and patients who had an \'open\' operation. Based on the patient\'s anatomy, the procedures employed were either robotic Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy (RYHJ) or robotic choledochoduodenostomy (CDD).
    From the 33 patients studied, 23 were female, and 10 were male. Anesthesiology (ASA) class was 3 ± 0.5; the MELD score was 9 ± 4.1; the Child-Pugh score was 6 ± 1.7. The primary indications for undergoing the operation included iatrogenic bile duct injuries, biliary strictures, and type 1 choledochal cysts. The average surgical duration was about 272 min, and the average blood loss amounted to 79 mL. Postoperatively, three patients experienced major complications, all attributed to anastomotic leaks. The average hospital stay was 4 days, with a readmission rate of 15% within 30 days. During an average follow-up period of 33 months, one patient had to undergo a revision at 18 months due to stricture. This necessitated further duct resection and reanastomosis. Notably, there were no reported hepatectomies, no conversion to the \'open\' method, no intraoperative complications, and no mortalities.
    Robotic extrahepatic bile duct resection and reconstruction with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy or choledochoduodenostomy is safe with an acceptable postoperative morbidity, short hospital length of stay, and low postoperative stricture rate at intermediate duration follow-up.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号