Big Five Inventory

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在每次社交互动中都会发生独特的人际同步,并由这些社会环境中参与个体的特征塑造。此外,根据上下文需求,人际同步也改变了。因此,这项研究旨在调查文化,性别,在一种新颖的角色扮演范式中,社会语境同时产生影响。此外,跨文化研究了人格特质对同步性的影响,并对这些变量对会前和会后移情变化的影响进行了进一步的探索性分析。
    方法:从新加坡和意大利招募了83个双子体,并参加了一个受试者内部会议,他们以自己(自然主义对话)和其他人(角色扮演和角色逆转)的身份相互交流。大五量表(会前管理)和人际关系反应指数(会前和会后管理)分别用作人格和同理心的量度,同时使用超扫描功能近红外光谱在前额叶皮层中测量同步性。经过数据预处理和初步分析,多元线性回归和探索性正向逐步回归模型的混合被用来解决上述研究目标。
    结果:结果显示,性别和社会背景对脑-脑同步的影响,特别是在前额叶皮层的内侧左簇,以及仅在意大利队列中的外向性和开放性对同步体验的独特贡献。最后,文化驱动的移情变化差异被确定,通常仅在新加坡队列中观察到不同会话的同理心显著增加。
    结论:主要发现表明,在角色扮演活动期间,大脑与大脑的同步性降低,这受到二元性别构成和文化的调节,这意味着社会交往的差异处理也受到个体背景因素的影响。研究结果与当前的文献一致,即角色扮演是一种对认知要求很高的活动,需要更高水平的自我调节和抑制自我相关的认知,而不是以同步为特征的人际共同调节。然而,研究多模态同步和确证的未来研究将更好地支持当前的结果模式。
    BACKGROUND: Unique interpersonal synchrony occurs during every social interaction, and is shaped by characteristics of participating individuals in these social contexts. Additionally, depending on context demands, interpersonal synchrony is also altered. The study therefore aims to investigate culture, sex, and social context effects simultaneously in a novel role-play paradigm. Additionally, the effect of personality traits on synchrony was investigated across cultures, and a further exploratory analysis on the effects of these variables on pre- and post-session empathy changes was conducted.
    METHODS: 83 dyads were recruited in two waves from Singapore and Italy and took part in a within-subjects session where they interacted with each other as themselves (Naturalistic Conversation) and as others (Role-Play and Role Reversal). Big Five Inventory (administered pre-session) and Interpersonal Reactivity Index (administered pre- and post-session) were used as measures of personality and empathy respectively, while synchrony was measured using hyperscanning functional near-infrared spectroscopy in the prefrontal cortex. After data-preprocessing and preliminary analyses, a mixture of multiple linear regression and exploratory forward stepwise regression models were used to address the above study aims.
    RESULTS: Results revealed significant main and interaction effects of culture, sex and social context on brain-to-brain synchrony, particularly in the medial left cluster of the prefrontal cortex, and a unique contribution of extraversion and openness to experience to synchrony in the Italian cohort only. Finally, culture-driven differences in empathy changes were identified, where significant increases in empathy across sessions were generally only observed within the Singaporean cohort.
    CONCLUSIONS: Main findings indicate lowered brain-to-brain synchrony during role-playing activities that is moderated by the dyad\'s sex make-up and culture, implying differential processing of social interactions that is also influenced by individuals\' background factors. Findings align with current literature that role-playing is a cognitively demanding activity requiring greater levels of self-regulation and suppression of self-related cognition as opposed to interpersonal co-regulation characterized by synchrony. However, the current pattern of results would be better supported by future studies investigating multimodal synchronies and corroboration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:选择儿科手术受训者是一个多方面的过程,受到面对面访谈的影响,以确定人格构成和机构兼容性。我们介绍了在选择候选人时利用经过验证的个性清单的经验。
    方法:选择参加2020年小儿外科比赛面对面访谈的所有申请人都获得了五大清单(BFI)问卷。使用申请信息和亲自面试分数制定了初始排名顺序列表(ROL)。在合并BFI数据后创建重新配制的ROL。对于初始ROL和重新配制的ROL,都评估了特定人格特征与ROL位置的相关性。
    结果:面试了34名申请人,排名24名(70.6%)。线性回归分析发现较低的神经质评分与初始ROL上较高的位置直接相关{R=.4626,P=.023}。重新制定的ROL确定了较高的责任心得分{R=.5331;P=.007}和较低的神经质得分{R=-.4383;P=.032}与最终ROL的上升相关。
    结论:自我管理的BFI增加了标准面对面访谈中的人格确定的客观性。责任心和神经质对最终的ROL位置有显著影响。添加客观的个性数据似乎在这个困难的过程中提供了额外的帮助。
    BACKGROUND: Selection of pediatric surgical trainees is a multifaceted process heavily influenced by in-person interviews to determine personality makeup and institutional compatibility. We present our experience in utilizing a validated personality inventory in the selection of our candidates.
    METHODS: All applicants selected for an in-person interview for the 2020 Pediatric Surgery Match were offered the Big Five Inventory (BFI) questionnaire. An initial rank order list (ROL) was formulated employing application information and in-person interview score. A reformulated ROL was created after incorporating BFI data. Correlation of specific personality characteristics vs position on the ROL was assessed for both the initial ROL and the reformulated ROL.
    RESULTS: Thirty-four applicants were interviewed and 24 (70.6%) were ranked. Linear regression analysis identified a lower neuroticism score directly related to a higher position on the initial ROL {R = .4626, P = .023}. The reformulated ROL identified a higher conscientiousness score {R = .5331; P = .007} and a lower neuroticism score {R = -.4383; P = .032} correlated with ascending the final ROL.
    CONCLUSIONS: The self-administered BFI adds objectivity to personality determination gleamed from the standard face-to-face interview. Conscientiousness and neuroticism had a significant impact on the final ROL position. Adding objective personality data appears to provide additional aid in this difficult process.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Personality traits have been shown to contribute to the development and persistence of fibromyalgia (FM)-related symptoms. The aim of this study was to identify the most prevalent personality factor in Brazilian female FM patients, using the Factorial Personality Battery (FPB) and comparing patients to age-matched healthy controls. This was a cross-sectional study based on 40 FM patients and 40 age-matched controls. The FPB is a Brazilian self-reporting questionnaire based on the Big Five Inventory, containing 126 items and scored on a Likert scale. The study included 80 participants aged on the average 46.6 ± 6.7 years (FM) and 45.6 ± 13.8 years (controls) (p = 0.121). The groups differed significantly with regard to schooling (p = 0.013). Time of disease and time to diagnosis was 11.3 ± 7.3 and 6.6 ± 4.5 years, respectively. Fourteen patients (35%) had hypertension and 52% reported sedentary lifestyle. Many had generalized anxiety disorder (82.5%) and/or major depressive disorder (35%). Three facets of Neuroticism were highly significant: vulnerability (p = 0.008), emotional instability (p < 0.001), and depression (p < 0.001). A significant association was found between Openness and time to diagnosis (p < 0.033). Using multiple linear regression, we identified the independent associations Extraversion x systemic arterial hypertension (OR = - 0.65, p = - 0.013) and Openness x sedentary lifestyle (OR =  - 0.48, p = 031). Neuroticism was the predominant factor, while Openness was found to be negatively correlated with time to diagnosis, suggesting personality assessments can help identify FM patterns used to tailor treatment and enhance compliance.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Interprofessional Education (IPE) is now included in curricula in universities worldwide. It is known that there are differences in attitudes towards IPE among students, but less is known regarding how students\' personalities and learnings styles correspond with those attitudes. The aim of this study was to investigate whether personality traits and learning styles have any impact on medical students\' attitudes towards IPE.
    METHODS: Seventy nine medical students in their 9th term (63% females, mean age 29 years) were questioned regarding their attitudes towards IPE according to the Interdisciplinary Education Perception Scale questionnaire, the Kolb\'s learning style and Big Five Inventory questionnaires. For all three instruments we used the Swedish translated versions.
    RESULTS: When investigated with a logistic regression, adjusting for age and gender, there were no significant associations between Big Five inventory, Kolb\'s learning style and IEPS, except for the Reflective-Pragmatic learning style that was moderately associated with a higher IEPS score.
    CONCLUSIONS: There was no clear correlation between personality, learning style and attitude towards IPE as measured by the IEPS among medical students in our study population. Further investigations would benefit from a combination of qualitative and quantitative design.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Introduction The personality of a human being consists of his behavior, cognition, emotional abilities, and interaction with his surroundings. The personality of an individual is modified by his ability for social perception, life experiences, and training. The pattern of study in which a person acquires education has a great influence on their personality. Objective To compare the personality traits and academic performance of boarders and non-boarders studying in a medical university. Material and methods It is a comparative, descriptive cross-sectional study done at Rawalpindi Medical University, Pakistan. The duration of the study was from January 2019 to April 2019. A questionnaire was randomly distributed among the students of Rawalpindi Medical University and filled under supervision. The questionnaire had two parts: (1) Academic performance information and (2) Big Five inventory (BFI-40). Only MBBS students of Rawalpindi Medical University were included. For statistical analysis, the independent t-test was applied using the Windows IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences Version 22 (SPSS, IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, US). The statistically significant value was taken as 0.05. Results Out of 300 questionnaires distributed, 287 were properly filled, giving a response rate of 95.6%. The Cronbach\'s alpha value was .750. The mean age was 20.87±1.344. There were 216 (75.1%) male and 71 (24.9%) females. One-hundred eighty-three (63.8%) were boarders and 104 (36.2%) were non-boarders. The mean scores of extraversion, agreeableness, and conscientiousness were higher for boarders while the mean scores of neuroticism and openness were higher for non-boarders. High average percentages in professional exams were common in non-boarders while boarders were taking more supplementary exams comparatively. Conclusion Self-discipline, surgency from external activities/situations, and getting along with others are common traits among boarders. On the other hand, non-boarders are more creative but emotionally unstable. The academic status of boarders is comparatively poor. Thus, the hostel administration should be particularly concerned about the activities of boarders, and parents should be aware of their child\'s academic status. Teachers should pay special attention to the character development of students.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The Big Five Inventory-2 (BFI-2) is a recently published 60-item questionnaire that measures personality traits within the five-factor model framework. An important aspect of the BFI-2 is that it measures the traits at both the domain and facet levels and also controls acquiescence bias via the balanced number of true- and false-keyed items across the domains and facets. The current research evaluates factorial measurement invariance of a Russian version of the BFI-2 across sex and age within samples of 1,024 university students (Study 1) and 1,029 Internet users (Study 2). Across these samples, men scored lower on the domains of negative emotionality and agreeableness and slightly higher on extraversion. Sex differences were also obtained on various facets. In the Internet sample, age correlated modestly with several Big Five domains in accordance with the well-documented maturity principle. The newly developed Russian version of BFI-2 showed good reliability and validity across both samples. Moreover, random intercept exploratory factor analyses showed that the BFI-2 displayed a hierarchical five-domain-15-facet structure that demonstrated strict measurement invariance across sex and age.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Zhang和Savalei(2015)的先前研究提出了Likert量表格式的替代量表格式:扩展格式。扩展格式的比例项目同时呈现正面措辞和负面措辞的句子,作为每个比例项目的响应选项;因此,他们受到李克特量表项目中经常出现的默认偏见和方法效应的影响较小。当前研究的主要目标是在不同的心理量表中进一步证明扩展格式相对于李克特格式的优越性。具体来说,我们的目标是复制Zhang和Savalei的发现,并确定扩展格式量表中是否存在订单效应。研究中检查了六个心理量表,包括五大清单(BFI)和罗森伯格自尊(RSE)量表的五个子量表。为每个心理量表创建了四个版本。一个版本是Likert格式的原始音阶。其他三个版本采用不同的扩展格式,其响应选项的顺序各不相同。对于每个刻度,参与者被随机分配完成一个量表版本.在每个量表的不同版本中,我们比较了响应选项的因素结构和分布。我们的结果成功地复制了张和萨瓦莱的发现,并且还表明,在扩展格式量表中通常不存在订单效应。基于这些有希望的发现,我们鼓励研究人员在实质性研究中对这些和其他量表使用扩展格式。
    Previous research by Zhang and Savalei (2015) proposed an alternative scale format to the Likert scale format: the Expanded format. Scale items in the Expanded format present both positively worded and negatively worded sentences as response options for each scale item; therefore, they were less affected by the acquiescence bias and method effects that often occur in the Likert scale items. The major goal of the current study is to further demonstrate the superiority of the Expanded format to the Likert format across different psychological scales. Specifically, we aim to replicate the findings of Zhang and Savalei and to determine whether order effect exists in the Expanded format scales. Six psychological scales were examined in the study, including the five subscales of the big five inventory (BFI) and the Rosenberg self-esteem (RSE) scale. Four versions were created for each psychological scale. One version was the original scale in the Likert format. The other three versions were in different Expanded formats that varied in the order of the response options. For each scale, the participant was randomly assigned to complete one scale version. Across the different versions of each scale, we compared the factor structures and the distributions of the response options. Our results successfully replicated the findings of Zhang and Savalei, and also showed that order effect was generally absent in the Expanded format scales. Based on these promising findings, we encourage researchers to use the Expanded format for these and other scales in their substantive research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Many people with ALS have been suggested to have a \"nice\" personality, but most ALS personality studies to date have had limited numbers of participants and have not taken into account personality differences between genders. We used Big Five Inventory data obtained from an online questionnaire looking for risk factors for ALS to investigate personality traits in large numbers of people with ALS and controls.
    A total of 741 questionnaire respondents aged 40 years and over indicated the extent to which they agreed with each of the 44 Big Five Inventory statements. Respondents were 339 with ALS (212 male, 127 female) who responded to the statements as they applied to them before their diagnosis and 402 controls (120 male, 282 female). Unpaired t tests with 95% confidence intervals were used to compare mean values of Big Five-factor scores.
    Female respondents taken together had higher mean scores for Agreeableness and Neuroticism than all male respondents. Male ALS respondents had higher mean scores than male controls for Conscientiousness and Extraversion. Female ALS respondents had higher mean scores than female controls for Agreeableness, Conscientiousness, and Extraversion, and a lower score for Neuroticism.
    Many people with ALS have personality traits that are likely to underlie the perception they are particularly \"nice.\" This raises the possibility that genetic polymorphisms that influence personality could play a role in ALS. Furthermore, different personality traits could underlie lifestyle choices that are currently thought to be risk factors for ALS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:多重迷你面试(MMI)是一种结构化的学生选择方法,其中申请人围绕一系列不需要先前学习的知识的站点旋转。大五清单(BFI)是通常用于衡量申请人选择中常用的人格特质的工具。
    目的:本研究的目的是使用BFI评估人格特质对牙科本科生在MMI中的表现的影响。
    方法:这项研究是在牙科学院进行的,阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学,吉达,沙特阿拉伯。所有申请阿卜杜勒阿齐兹国王大学牙科课程的本科生,牙科学院(KAUFD)在两个学年[(2014-2015)和(2015-2016)]承担了在KAUFD举行的MMI,并完成了BFI清单,共有350名学生。MMI由五个站组成,而BFI包含44个项目。数据采用SPSS第20版,采用独立样本t检验,Mann-WhitneyU测试,Spearmanρ相关系数和卡方检验。
    结果:女学生的得分高于男学生,但第一年的同理心站得分仅有统计学意义(p<0.001),其次是移情能力和团队合作能力(p<0.05)。BFI结果表明,第一年,男生在同意方面得分较高(p<0.003),在神经质方面得分较低(p<0.001),而第二年,女生在同意和尽责方面得分较高(p<0.001)。与公立学校相比,私立学校的学生的MMI总分更高(p<0.05)。
    结论:MMI与五大清单相结合可以成为入院过程中的有用工具。
    BACKGROUND: Multiple mini interviews (MMI) is a structured student selection method where applicants rotate around a series of stations that do not require previously learned knowledge. The Big Five Inventory (BFI) is a tool often used to measure personality traits commonly used in applicant selection.
    OBJECTIVE: The aim of the current study was to assess the effect of personality traits using the BFI on undergraduate dental students\' performance in MMI.
    METHODS: This research was conducted at The Faculty of Dentistry, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. All undergraduates applying to the dental program at King Abdulaziz University, Faculty of Dentistry (KAUFD) in two academic years [(2014-2015) and (2015-2016)] undertook the MMI held at KAUFD and completed the BFI inventory with a total number of 350 students. The MMI consisted of five stations while the BFI contained forty-four items. Data were analysed by SPSS version 20, using independent-samples t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, Spearman\'s rho correlation coefficient and Chi-square test.
    RESULTS: female students scored higher than their male counterparts but scores were only significant in the empathy station (p<0.001) in the first year, and in both empathetic skills and team work abilities (p<0.05) in the second. BFI results indicate that male students scored higher on agreeableness (p<0.003) and lower on neuroticism (p<0.001) in the first year while female students scored higher on agreeableness and conscientiousness (p<0.001) in the second year. Students of private schools had higher total MMI scores compared to those of public schools (p<0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: MMI combined with the Big Five Inventory can be a useful tool in the admission process.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号