Bictegravir

Bictegravir
  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    我们的目的是确定与持续dolutegravirl-相比,在HIV(PWH)患者中,切换到比特拉韦在维持不可检测的病毒载量(<50拷贝/mL)中的有效性,efavirenz-,或基于raltegravir的抗逆转录病毒治疗使用来自墨西哥的全国观察数据。
    我们模拟了3个目标试验,比较了切换到bictegravir与继续使用dolutegravir,efavirenz,或者Raltegravir.合格标准是年龄≥16岁的PWH,病毒载量<50拷贝/mL,并且至少接受3个月的当前抗逆转录病毒治疗(dolutegravir,efavirenz,或raltegravir)在2019年7月至2021年9月之间。在研究期间模拟每周目标试验,如果个人继续符合资格,他们将被包括在每一个仿真中。主要结果是3个月时检测不到病毒载量的可能性,这是通过调整后的逻辑回归模型估计的。通过差异比较估计的概率,95%CI是通过Bootstrap计算的。结果也在12个月时确定,并进行敏感性分析以检验我们的分析选择。
    我们分析了3028619PWH(63581个独特个体)的数据。3个月时检测不到病毒载量的概率为2.9%(95%CI,1.9%-3.8%),1.3%(95%CI,.9%-1.6%),和1.2%(95%CI,.8%-1.7%)更高,当切换到比替格韦与继续与dolutegravir相比,efavirenz,还有Raltegravir,分别。在12个月和其他敏感性分析中观察到类似的结果。
    我们的研究结果表明,与继续使用dolutegravir相比,改用bictegravir可能更有效地维持病毒抑制,efavirenz,或者Raltegravir.
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to determine the effectiveness of switching to bictegravir in maintaining an undetectable viral load (<50 copies/mL) among people with HIV (PWH) as compared with continuing dolutegravir-, efavirenz-, or raltegravir-based antiretroviral therapy using nationwide observational data from Mexico.
    UNASSIGNED: We emulated 3 target trials comparing switching to bictegravir vs continuing with dolutegravir, efavirenz, or raltegravir. Eligibility criteria were PWH aged ≥16 years with a viral load <50 copies/mL and at least 3 months of current antiretroviral therapy (dolutegravir, efavirenz, or raltegravir) between July 2019 and September 2021. Weekly target trials were emulated during the study period, and individuals were included in every emulation if they continued to be eligible. The main outcome was the probability of an undetectable viral load at 3 months, which was estimated via an adjusted logistic regression model. Estimated probabilities were compared via differences, and 95% CIs were calculated via bootstrap. Outcomes were also ascertained at 12 months, and sensitivity analyses were performed to test our analytic choices.
    UNASSIGNED: We analyzed data from 3 028 619 PWH (63 581 unique individuals). The probability of an undetectable viral load at 3 months was 2.9% (95% CI, 1.9%-3.8%), 1.3% (95% CI, .9%-1.6%), and 1.2% (95% CI, .8%-1.7%) higher when switching to bictegravir vs continuing with dolutegravir, efavirenz, and raltegravir, respectively. Similar results were observed at 12 months and in other sensitivity analyses.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings suggest that switching to bictegravir could be more effective in maintaining viral suppression than continuing with dolutegravir, efavirenz, or raltegravir.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们使用最新批准的整合酶抑制剂(INIs)dolutegravir(DTG)描述和分析抗逆转录病毒治疗的耐药相关突变(RM)和病毒学失败(VF),bictegravir(BIC),和Cabotegravir(CAB),以及固定剂量制剂中的配套药物:BIC/恩曲他滨/替诺福韦;CAB/利匹韦林;DTG/阿巴卡韦/拉米夫定;DTG/恩曲他滨/替诺福韦;和DTG/拉米夫定。根据系统评价和荟萃分析指南(PRISMA)的首选报告项目,在PubMed和其他电子数据库中进行了系统文献检索,用于2010年1月至2023年5月之间发表的临床研究。分析了INI的VF和RM。50个临床研究包括在合成中。抗逆转录病毒治疗(ART)初治患者的VF发生率为0.7-4.0%,0.6-1.4%,0.6-9.0%的患者接受DTG治疗,BIC,还有CAB,分别。既往ART患者的VF报告为0-8.1%,0-2.0%,和0.4-2.3%的DTG治疗,BIC,还有CAB,分别。仅在一项使用DTG(0.3%)的ART初治患者中检测到RM,没有BIC的研究,和3项CAB研究(0.1-5.4%)。在有ART经验的患者中,在0-1.9%的DTG治疗患者中检测到RM。在审查的11项BIC研究中未检测到RM病例。在CAB的情况下,在8项研究中检测到RM,范围从0.3%到1.9%的患者。总之,使用最新的INI,审查的研究中的RM率通常较低。这篇综述将BIC确定为观察到的VF和缺乏RM数量最低的INI。
    We describe and analyze resistance-associated mutations (RM) and virological failures (VF) on antiretroviral therapy using the latest approved integrase inhibitors (INIs) dolutegravir (DTG), bictegravir (BIC), and cabotegravir (CAB), together with their companion drugs in fixed-dose formulations: BIC/emtricitabine/tenofovir; CAB/rilpivirine; DTG/abacavir/lamivudine; DTG/emtricitabine/tenofovir; and DTG/lamivudine. Systematic literature searches were conducted in PubMed and other electronic databases for clinical studies published between January 2010 and May 2023, according to preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses guidelines (PRISMA), which analyzed VFs and RMs of INIs. Fifty clinical studies were included in the synthesis. VF in antiretroviral treatment (ART)-naïve patients occurred in 0.7-4.0%, 0.6-1.4%, and 0.6-9.0% of patients treated with DTG, BIC, and CAB, respectively. VF was reported in patients with previous ART in 0-8.1%, 0-2.0%, and 0.4-2.3% of those treated with DTG, BIC, and CAB, respectively. RMs were detected in ART-naïve patients in only one study with DTG (0.3%), none of the studies with BIC, and three of the studies with CAB (0.1-5.4%). In ART-experienced patients, RMs were detected in 0-1.9% of DTG-treated patients. No cases of RM were detected in the 11 BIC studies reviewed. In the case of CAB, RMs were detected in eight studies, ranging from 0.3% to 1.9% of patients. In conclusion, RM rates in the studies reviewed were generally low using the latest INIs. This review identified BIC as the INI with the lowest number of observed VF and lack of RM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于整合酶链转移抑制剂(INSTIs)的抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)目前用作治疗HIV感染的一线方案。尽管它具有很高的功效和抵抗的屏障,ART相关的神经精神不良反应仍然是一个主要问题。最近的研究已经确定了INSTI之间的潜在相互作用,dolutegravir(DTG),和胎盘屏障处的叶酸转运途径。我们假设这种相互作用也可能发生在两个主要的血脑界面:血脑脊液屏障(BCSFB)和血脑屏障(BBB)。为了解决这个问题,我们评估了两个研究所的效果,DTG和bictegravir(BTG),对小鼠BCSFB和BBB叶酸转运蛋白和受体表达的影响,离体和体内。我们证明在体外人和小鼠BBB模型中,DTG而不是BTG显着下调叶酸转运蛋白(RFC/SLC19A1,PCFT/SLC46A1)的mRNA和/或蛋白质表达,和离体小鼠脑毛细血管。我们的体内研究进一步显示,在C57BL/6小鼠中,经过14天的DTG口服治疗后,BCSFB和BBB的Slc19a1和Slc46a1mRNA表达显着下调。然而,尽管观察到DTG在两个脑屏障的叶酸转运蛋白/受体中的下调作用,基于DTG的ART的14天口服治疗未显著改变动物的脑叶酸水平.有趣的是,DTG治疗强烈提高了小鼠脑微血管内皮细胞(BBB)的原代培养物中促炎细胞因子和趋化因子(Cxcl1,Cxcl2,Cxcl3,Il6,Il23,Il12)的mRNA和/或蛋白质表达。DTG口服治疗也显着上调促炎细胞因子和趋化因子(Il6,Il1β,Tnfα,CCl2)在小鼠的BCSFB处。我们还观察到从DTG处理的小鼠分离的CP中药物外排转运蛋白(Abcc1,Abcc4和Abcb1a)和紧密连接蛋白(Cldn3)的mRNA表达下调。尽管结构相似,BTG仅在BBB和BCSFB引起对感兴趣的标志物的较小影响。总之,我们目前的数据表明,在啮齿动物BBB和BCSFB模型中,DTG而非BTG强烈诱导炎症反应.一起,这些数据为DTG诱导的脑毒性机制提供了有价值的见解,这可能有助于DTG相关神经精神不良反应的发病机制。
    Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) based antiretroviral therapy (ART) is currently used as first-line regimen to treat HIV infection. Despite its high efficacy and barrier to resistance, ART-associated neuropsychiatric adverse effects remain a major concern. Recent studies have identified a potential interaction between the INSTI, dolutegravir (DTG), and folate transport pathways at the placental barrier. We hypothesized that such interactions could also occur at the two major blood-brain interfaces: blood-cerebrospinal fluid barrier (BCSFB) and blood-brain barrier (BBB). To address this question, we evaluated the effect of two INSTIs, DTG and bictegravir (BTG), on folate transporters and receptor expression at the mouse BCSFB and the BBB in vitro, ex vivo and in vivo. We demonstrated that DTG but not BTG significantly downregulated the mRNA and/or protein expression of folate transporters (RFC/SLC19A1, PCFT/SLC46A1) in human and mouse BBB models in vitro, and mouse brain capillaries ex vivo. Our in vivo study further revealed a significant downregulation in Slc19a1 and Slc46a1 mRNA expression at the BCSFB and the BBB following a 14-day DTG oral treatment in C57BL/6 mice. However, despite the observed downregulatory effect of DTG in folate transporters/receptor at both brain barriers, a 14-day oral treatment of DTG-based ART did not significantly alter the brain folate level in animals. Interestingly, DTG treatment robustly elevated the mRNA and/or protein expression of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines (Cxcl1, Cxcl2, Cxcl3, Il6, Il23, Il12) in primary cultures of mouse brain microvascular endothelial cells (BBB). DTG oral treatment also significantly upregulated proinflammatory cytokines and chemokine (Il6, Il1β, Tnfα, Ccl2) at the BCSFB in mice. We additionally observed a downregulated mRNA expression of drug efflux transporters (Abcc1, Abcc4, and Abcb1a) and tight junction protein (Cldn3) at the CP isolated from mice treated with DTG. Despite the structural similarities, BTG only elicited minor effects on the markers of interest at both the BBB and BCSFB. In summary, our current data demonstrates that DTG but not BTG strongly induced inflammatory responses in a rodent BBB and BCSFB model. Together, these data provide valuable insights into the mechanism of DTG-induced brain toxicity, which may contribute to the pathogenesis of DTG-associated neuropsychiatric adverse effect.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)继续对全球健康构成严重威胁。口服暴露前预防(PrEP),被认为对艾滋病毒预防非常有效,是在高风险未感染的个体接触艾滋病毒之前使用抗逆转录病毒(ARV)药物。然而,由于每日口服给药,ARV药物与患者依从性差和药丸疲劳有关。因此,需要一种替代的药物输送策略.在这项工作中,我们开发了两种含有比替格雷韦(BIC)或替诺福韦艾拉酚胺(TAF)固体药物纳米颗粒(SDN)的溶解微针贴片(MNs),用于全身递送新型ARV方案,以预防HIV.根据离体皮肤沉积研究,大约11%和50%的BIC和TAF使用溶解MN递送,分别。SpragueDawley大鼠的药代动力学研究表明,BICMNs实现了长效释放曲线,保持相对血浆浓度高于95%抑制浓度(IC95)3周。对于TAFMN,从血浆样品中获得药物的快速释放和TAF向TFV的代谢。这项工作表明,所提出的透皮给药平台可以作为一种替代方法,用于系统性地给HIVPrEP提供抗逆转录病毒药物。
    Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) continues to pose a serious threat to global health. Oral preexposure prophylaxis (PrEP), considered highly effective for HIV prevention, is the utilisation of antiretroviral (ARV) drugs before HIV exposure in high-risk uninfected individuals. However, ARV drugs are associated with poor patient compliance and pill fatigue due to their daily oral dosing. Therefore, an alternative strategy for drug delivery is required. In this work, two dissolving microneedle patches (MNs) containing either bictegravir (BIC) or tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) solid drug nanoparticles (SDNs) were developed for systemic delivery of a novel ARV regimen for potential HIV prevention. According to ex vivo skin deposition studies, approximately 11% and 50% of BIC and TAF was delivered using dissolving MNs, respectively. Pharmacokinetic studies in Sprague Dawley rats demonstrated that BIC MNs achieved a long-acting release profile, maintaining the relative plasma concentration above the 95% inhibitory concentration (IC95) for 3 weeks. For TAF MNs, a rapid release of drug and metabolism of TAF into TFV were obtained from the plasma samples. This work has shown that the proposed transdermal drug delivery platform could be potentially used as an alternative method to systemically deliver ARV drugs for HIV PrEP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:主要目的是比较杜鲁特韦/拉米夫定(DTG/3TC)和比替格韦/恩曲他滨/替诺福韦-艾拉酚胺(BIC/FTC/TAF)的持续用药情况,分析停药原因。
    方法:我们进行了回顾性研究,非干预性,描述性,描述性纵向研究。包括在我们中心接受DTG/3TC或BIC/FTC/TAF治疗的18年以上的所有人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)患者。使用χ2检验比较第一年后的持久性。进行Kaplan-Meier生存分析。
    结果:纳入了350例患者。在第一年后DTG/3TC和BIC/FTC/TAF分别为99.5%和90.99%(p=.001)。DGT/3TC的持久性为1237天(IC95%1216-1258),BIC/FTC/TAF的持久性为986天[(IC95%950-1021);p<.001]。用cox回归模型调整协变量后,差异仍然存在[HR=8.2(IC95%1.03-64.9),p=.047]。停用BIC/FTC/TAF的主要原因是毒性/耐受性。
    结论:在我们的研究中,患者有很高的持久性。与BIC/FTC/TAF相比,接受DTG/3TC治疗的患者更持久,尽管BIC/FTC/TAF的基线特征较差。停用BIC/FTC/TAF的主要原因是耐受性/毒性。
    OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to compare the persistence between dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) and bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir-alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) and to analyze reasons for discontinuation.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, non-interventional, descriptive, and longitudinal study. All human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients over 18 years treated with DTG/3TC or BIC/FTC/TAF in our center were included. Persistence after first year was compared using the χ2 test. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed.
    RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-eight patients were included. 99.5% versus 90.99% of patients were persistent after the first year for DTG/3TC and BIC/FTC/TAF respectively (p=.001). Persistence with DGT/3TC was 1237 days (IC95% 1216-1258) and persistence with BIC/FTC/TAF was 986 days [(IC95% 950-1021); p<.001]. The difference was remained after adjusting for covariates with the cox regression model [HR=8.2 (IC95% 1.03-64.9), p=.047]. The main reasons for discontinuation for BIC/FTC/TAF were toxicity/tolerability.
    CONCLUSIONS: In our study, patients have a high persistence. Patients on DTG/3TC treatment are more persistent compared to BIC/FTC/TAF, although BIC/FTC/TAF have worse baseline characteristics. The main reason for discontinuation of BIC/FTC/TAF is tolerability/toxicity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:关于改用替诺福韦艾拉酚胺(TAF)为基础的方案的研究引起了人们对HIV感染者代谢状况恶化的担忧,尽管大多数人在以前的治疗方案中接受了富马酸替诺福韦酯(TDF)。这项研究旨在评估脂质组分的变化,葡萄糖,从TDF或TAF保留方案切换到比替韦韦/恩曲他滨/TAF(B/F/TAF)后,肝脂肪变性(HS)的血清标志物。
    方法:我们对在2019年1月至2022年5月期间从TDF或TAF保留方案转换为B/F/TAF的HIV感染者进行了一项回顾性队列研究,并进行了至少6个月的随访。主要终点是6个月时脂质组分的绝对变化。次要结果是12个月时脂质组分的变化和其他代谢参数的变化(葡萄糖,肌酐,和基于6个月和12个月时的甘油三酯与葡萄糖[TyG]比率的HS)。使用随机截距和时间作为固定效应的混合线性回归模型分析变化。
    结果:该研究包括259名HIV感染者(中位年龄55[四分位距(IQR)47-60]岁;80%男性;88%高加索人;CD4T细胞计数675[IQR450-880]细胞/mm3;84.3%HIV-RNA<50拷贝/mL)。总的来说,63例(30%)有高血压,93(44%)血脂异常,30(14%)糖尿病,和45%的肥胖/超重。大多数(60%)从基于整合酶抑制剂的方案转换,21%的人从加强方案切换。6个月时,观察到总胆固醇显着降低(-7.64mg/dL[95%置信区间(CI)-13.52至-1.76;p=0.002]),甘油三酯(-23.4[95%CI-42.07至-4.65];p=0.003),和TyG比率(-0.14[95%CI-0.23至-0.05];p<0.001)。
    结论:在我们的现实生活中,将TDF-/TAF-保留方案转换为B/F/TAF三联疗法的效果可改善总胆固醇,甘油三酯,在6个月时和HS的血清标志物,在12个月时其余的代谢参数是中性的。
    BACKGROUND: Studies on switching to tenofovir alafenamide (TAF)-based regimens raise concerns about a worse metabolic profile in people with HIV, even though most received tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in their previous regimen. This study aims to evaluate changes in lipid fractions, glucose, and serum markers for hepatic steatosis (HS) after switching from a TDF- or TAF-sparing regimen to bictegravir/emtricitabine/TAF (B/F/TAF).
    METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of people with HIV who switched to B/F/TAF from TDF- or TAF-sparing regimens between January 2019 and May 2022 with at least 6 months of follow-up. The primary endpoint was the absolute change in lipid fractions at 6 months. Secondary outcomes were changes in lipid fractions at 12 months and changes in other metabolic parameters (glucose, creatinine, and HS based on the triglyceride-to-glucose [TyG] ratio at 6 and 12 months). Changes were analysed using mixed linear regression models with random intercept and time as a fixed effect.
    RESULTS: The study included 259 people with HIV (median age 55 [interquartile range (IQR) 47-60] years; 80% male; 88% Caucasian; CD4+ T-cell count 675 [IQR 450-880] cells/mm3; 84.3% HIV-RNA <50 copies/mL). In total, 63 patients (30%) had hypertension, 93 (44%) dyslipidaemia, 30 (14%) diabetes, and 45% obesity/overweight. Most (60%) switched from integrase inhibitor-based regimens, and 21% switched from a boosted regimen. At 6 months, significant reductions were observed in total cholesterol (-7.64 mg/dL [95% confidence interval (CI) -13.52 to -1.76; p = 0.002]), triglycerides (-23.4 [95% CI -42.07 to -4.65]; p = 0.003), and TyG ratio (-0.14 [95% CI -0.23 to -0.05]; p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: In our real-life cohort, the effect of switching TDF-/TAF-sparing regimens to triple therapy with B/F/TAF improved total cholesterol, triglycerides, and serum markers of HS at 6 months and was neutral for the remaining metabolic parameters at 12 months.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    抗逆转录病毒药物有可能引起药物相互作用,通过激活外排转运蛋白通过核受体,导致无效或毒性,改变其靶位点的药物浓度。
    本研究使用分子动力学模拟和qRT-PCR来研究bictegravir与核受体Pxr和Car的相互作用,及其对外排转运蛋白的影响(P-gp,Bcrp,大鼠PBMC中的Mrp1)。使用LC-MS/MS测量PBMC/血浆药物浓度以评估转运蛋白表达的功能影响。
    Bictegravir显著增加ABC转运体的表达,汽车被确定为关键调解人。这表明bictegravir对核受体的影响可能会影响细胞水平的药物运输和功效。
    Bictegravir激活核受体,增强外排转运的表达。了解这些相互作用对于预防药物-药物相互作用和减少临床使用中的毒性至关重要。将Car拮抗剂与bictegravir联合使用可以防止耐药性和毒性。然而,这些发现是基于临床前数据,需要进一步的临床试验来确认其在临床环境中的适用性。
    UNASSIGNED: Antiretrovirals have the potential to cause drug interactions leading to inefficacy or toxicity via induction of efflux transporters through nuclear receptors, altering drug concentrations at their target sites.
    UNASSIGNED: This study used molecular dynamic simulations and qRT-PCR to investigate bictegravir\'s interactions with nuclear receptors PXR and CAR, and its effects on efflux transporters (P-gp, BCRP, MRP1) in rat PBMCs. PBMC/plasma drug concentrations were measured using LC-MS/MS to assess the functional impact of transporter expression.
    UNASSIGNED: Bictegravir significantly increased the expression of ABC transporters, with Car identified as a key mediator. This suggests that bictegravir\'s influence on nuclear receptors could affect drug transport and efficacy at the cellular level.
    UNASSIGNED: Bictegravir activates nuclear receptors enhancing efflux transporter expression. Understanding these interactions is crucial for preventing drug-drug interactions and reducing toxicity in clinical use. Combining CAR antagonists with bictegravir may prevent drug resistance and toxicity. However, these findings are based on preclinical data and necessitate further clinical trials to confirm their applicability in clinical settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    逆转录病毒整合研究领域具有悠久的历史,始于前病毒假说以及随后的逆转录病毒逆转录酶和整合酶的发现。因为这两种酶都是逆转录病毒复制所必需的,它们成为有价值的目标,努力发现有效的化合物,以抑制HIV-1复制。2007年,第一个整合酶链转移抑制剂获得临床许可,随后批准的第二代整合酶抑制剂现在通常与逆转录酶抑制剂共同配制用于治疗HIV感染者。1995年首次召开的国际会议特别侧重于整合酶和逆转录病毒整合研究,本文是第七届逆转录病毒整合国际会议上病毒特刊的一部分,于2023年夏天在科罗拉多州博尔德举行。在这里,我们概述了该领域的主要历史发展,特别是它们与链转移抑制剂类药物的开发有关。从1990年代中期开始,研究进展通过国际会议的镜头呈现。我们的概述强调了定期安排的影响,特定主题的国际会议可以举行社区建设,因此,关于特定领域的合作和科学进步。
    The field of retroviral integration research has a long history that started with the provirus hypothesis and subsequent discoveries of the retroviral reverse transcriptase and integrase enzymes. Because both enzymes are essential for retroviral replication, they became valued targets in the effort to discover effective compounds to inhibit HIV-1 replication. In 2007, the first integrase strand transfer inhibitor was licensed for clinical use, and subsequently approved second-generation integrase inhibitors are now commonly co-formulated with reverse transcriptase inhibitors to treat people living with HIV. International meetings specifically focused on integrase and retroviral integration research first convened in 1995, and this paper is part of the Viruses Special Issue on the 7th International Conference on Retroviral Integration, which was held in Boulder Colorado in the summer of 2023. Herein, we overview key historical developments in the field, especially as they pertain to the development of the strand transfer inhibitor drug class. Starting from the mid-1990s, research advancements are presented through the lens of the international conferences. Our overview highlights the impact that regularly scheduled, subject-specific international meetings can have on community-building and, as a result, on field-specific collaborations and scientific advancements.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:已经采用了多种策略来减少艾滋病毒的发病率,包括PrEP和快速启动抗逆转录病毒治疗。研究目标是评估疗效,安全,满意,治疗依从性,在未治疗的患者中,通过快速启动比替格韦/恩曲他滨/替诺福韦艾拉酚胺(BIC/FTC/TAF)获得的系统保留。
    方法:第四阶段,多中心,开放标签,单臂,为期48周的临床试验在2020年1月至2022年6月期间招募了患者。使用SMAQ问卷和患者对EQ-5D的满意度评估对治疗的依从性。
    结果:208名参与者入选,平均年龄为35.6岁;87.6%为男性;平均CD4计数为393.5个细胞/uL(22.1%中<200个细胞/uL);病毒载量日志为5.6(VL>100,000个/mL,43.3%);22.6%患有AIDS,4.3%合并HBV感染。在98.6%的参与者中,BIC/FTC/TAF是在首次访问艾滋病毒专家当天启动的,9.6%的患者失去随访。48周时的疗效为意向治疗(ITT)的84.1%,修改后的ITT为94.6%,和每个方案分析的98.3%。对于3级不良事件,在第1周期间在两名受试者(0.9%)中停止该方案。治疗依从性[第4周(90%,IQR:80-99%)与48(90%,IQR:80-95%;p=0.49)]和患者满意度[第4周(90%,IQR:80-99%)与48(90%,IQR:80-95p=0.49)的比率在48周的研究期间非常高。
    结论:BIC/FTC/TAF是初治HIV患者快速启动ART的合适选择,提供高功效,安全,耐用性,治疗依从性,保留在医疗保健系统中,患者满意度。临床试验注册编号:NCT06177574。
    OBJECTIVE: Multiple strategies have been utilised to reduce the incidence of HIV, including PrEP and rapid antiretroviral therapy initiation. The study objectives were to evaluate the efficacy, safety, satisfaction, treatment adherence, and system retention obtained with rapid initiation of bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) in naïve patients.
    METHODS: This phase IV, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, 48-week clinical trial enrolled patients between January 2020 and June 2022. Adherence to treatment was evaluated with the SMAQ questionnaire and patient satisfaction with the EQ-5D.
    RESULTS: Two hundred eight participants were enrolled with mean age of 35.6 years; 87.6% were males; mean CD4 count was 393.5 cells/uL (<200 cells/uL in 22.1%); viral load log was 5.6 (VL>100 000 cop/mL in 43.3%); 22.6% had AIDS, and 4.3% were coinfected with HBV. BIC/FTC/TAF was initiated on the day of their first visit to the HIV specialist in 98.6% of participants, and 9.6% were lost to follow-up. The efficacy at week 48 was 84.1 % by intention-to- treat (ITT), 94.6% by modified ITT, and 98.3% by per protocol analysis. The regimen was discontinued in two subjects (0.9%) during week 1 for grade 3 adverse events. Treatment adherence (weeks 4 [90%, IQR: 80-99%] vs. 48 [90%, IQR: 80-95%; P = 0.49]) and patient satisfaction (weeks 4 [90%, IQR: 80-99%] vs. 48 [90%, IQR: 80-95 P = 0.49]) rates were very high over the 48- week study period.
    CONCLUSIONS: BIC/FTC/TAF is an appropriate option for rapid ART initiation in naïve HIV patients, offering high efficacy, safety, durability, treatment adherence, retention in the healthcare system, and patient satisfaction. Number Clinical Trial registration: NCT06177574.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:主要目的是比较杜鲁特韦/拉米夫定(DTG/3TC)和比替格韦/恩曲他滨/替诺福韦-艾拉酚胺(BIC/FTC/TAF)的持续用药情况,分析停药原因。
    方法:我们进行了回顾性研究,非干预性,描述性和纵向研究。包括在我们中心接受DTG/3TC或BIC/FTC/TAF治疗的18年以上的所有人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)患者。使用χ2检验比较第一年后的持久性。进行Kaplan-Meier生存分析。
    结果:纳入了350例患者。在第一年后DTG/3TC和BIC/FTC/TAF分别为99.5%和90.99%(p=0.001)。DGT/3TC的持久性为1,237天(IC95%1,216-1,258),BIC/FTC/TAF的持久性为986天([IC95%950-1,021];p<0.001)。在用cox回归模型调整协变量后,差异仍然存在(HR=8.2[IC95%1.03-64.9],p=0.047)。停用BIC/FTC/TAF的主要原因是毒性/耐受性。
    结论:在我们的研究中,患者有较高的持续性。与BIC/FTC/TAF相比,接受DTG/3TC治疗的患者更持久,尽管BIC/FTC/TAF的基线特征较差。停用BIC/FTC/TAF的主要原因是耐受性/毒性。
    OBJECTIVE: The main objective was to compare the persistence between dolutegravir/lamivudine (DTG/3TC) and bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir-alafenamide (BIC/FTC/TAF) and to analyze reasons for discontinuation.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective, non-interventional, descriptive and longitudinal study. All human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) patients over 18 years treated with DTG/3TC or BIC/FTC/TAF in our center were included. Persistence after first year was compared using the χ2 test. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed.
    RESULTS: Three hundred fifty-eight patients were included. 99.5% versus 90.99% of patients were persistent after the first year for DTG/3TC and BIC/FTC/TAF respectively (p = 0.001). Persistence with DGT/3TC was 1,237 days (IC95% 1,216-1,258) and persistence with BIC/FTC/TAF was 986 days ([IC95% 950-1,021]; p < 0.001). The difference was remained after adjusting for covariates with the cox regression model (HR= 8.2 [IC95% 1.03-64.9], p = 0.047). The main reasons for discontinuation for BIC/FTC/TAF were toxicity/tolerability.
    CONCLUSIONS: In our study patients had a high persistence. Patients on DTG/3TC treatment were more persistent compared to BIC/FTC/TAF, although BIC/FTC/TAF have worse baseline characteristics. The main reason for discontinuation of BIC/FTC/TAF was tolerability/toxicity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号