UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective cohort study, independent risk factors that influence untreatable progression (UP) and time to UP (TTUP) in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after locoregional interventional therapy were examined. The effects of initial response and best response on UP occurrence and TTUP after locoregional interventional therapy were evaluated.
UNASSIGNED: Data were collected from HCC patients who were initially treated with the drug-eluting beads-transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (DEB-TACE) procedure at our hospital from January 2017 to December 2022. Modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (m-RECIST) was used to evaluate the radiologic response of tumors. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the risk factors for UP in patients, and Cox regression analysis was used to discover independent variables that influenced TTUP.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 93 patients who initially underwent the DEB-TACE procedure were included. Subsequent to initial treatment, 50 patients continued with DEB-TACE treatment, while 43 received DEB-TACE and sequential thermal ablation treatment. The probability of developing UP was 82.8% (n = 77). Furthermore, 49 (52.7%) patients achieved an initial response, and 70 (75.3%) achieved the best response. Multivariate logistic regression analysis confirmed three independent risk factors of UP, namely, age (odds ratio [OR]: 0.950, p = 0.044); initial response (OR: 0.177, p = 0.020); and treatment regimen (OR: 7.133, p = 0.007). Multivariate Cox regression found that total bilirubin (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.029, p = 0.002), tumor distribution (HR: 1.752, p = 0.034), Subjective Angiographic Chemoembolization Endpoint (SACE) classification (HR: 0.668, p = 0.043), number of tumors (HR: 1.130, p = 0.004), initial response (HR: 0.539, p = 0.019), and treatment regimen (HR: 4.615, p < 0.001) were independent variables that influenced TTUP.
UNASSIGNED: Age, initial response, and treatment regimen significantly affected the occurrence of UP in HCC patients. Initial response, SACE classification, treatment regimen, total bilirubin, number of tumors, and tumor distribution were significantly correlated with TTUP. The initial response following locoregional interventional therapy had greater effects on UP occurrence and TTUP than the best response.

BACKGROUND: No definite conclusion has yet to be reached for immunotherapy beyond progression(IBP) of first-line immunotherapy as the second-line treatment for advanced NSCLC patients with negative driver genes. Therefore a retrospective study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy of IBP in this population and investigated whether the cycles best response and progressive mode of first-line immunotherapy could affect the results.
METHODS: The clinical data of patients with advanced NSCLC whose response was evaluated as progressive disease (PD) after receiving a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors as first-line therapy were retrospectively collected and the patients were assigned to the IBP and non-IBP groups. The overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated between the two groups. The survival effects of cycles best response and progressive mode of first-line immunotherapy were also evaluated.
RESULTS: Between January 2019 and January 2022, a total of 121 patients was evaluated as PD after first-line immunotherapy in our institution; 53 (43.8%) patients were included in the IBP group and 68 (56.2%) patients were included in the non-IBP group. The OS and PFS were no significantly different between the two groups in whole population. Further analysis revealed the OS was prolonged with the prolongation of first-line medication cycle. The median OS was 15.4m (15.4 vs 10.8 p=0.047) 16.1m (16.1 vs 10.8 p=0.039), 16.3m (16.3 vs 10.9 p=0.029) for patients with ≥4, ≥6, ≥8 cycles in first-line immunotherapy, respectively. The advantages of OS and PFS were also seen in the subgroup of PR (best response) and oligo progression of first-line immunotherapy.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinical outcomes of IBP were similar to those of non-IBP in patients with PD after first-line immnuotherapy in advanced NSCLC. But more cycles, PR as best response and oligo progression in first-line was benefit.

The high morbidity of acute respiratory infections constitutes a crucial global health burden. In particular, for SARS-CoV-2, non-pharmaceutical intervention geared to enforce social distancing policies, vaccination, and treatments will remain an essential part of public health policies to mitigate and control disease outbreaks. However, the implementation of mitigation measures directed to increase social distancing when the risk of contagion is a complex enterprise because of the impact of NPI on beliefs, political views, economic issues, and, in general, public perception. The way of implementing these mitigation policies studied in this work is the so-called traffic-light monitoring system that attempts to regulate the application of measures that include restrictions on mobility and the size of meetings, among other non-pharmaceutical strategies. Balanced enforcement and relaxation of measures guided through a traffic-light system that considers public risk perception and economic costs may improve the public health benefit of the policies while reducing their cost. We derive a model for the epidemiological traffic-light policies based on the best response for trigger measures driven by the risk perception of people, instantaneous reproduction number, and the prevalence of a hypothetical acute respiratory infection. With numerical experiments, we evaluate and identify the role of appreciation from a hypothetical controller that could opt for protocols aligned with the cost due to the burden of the underlying disease and the economic cost of implementing measures. As the world faces new acute respiratory outbreaks, our results provide a methodology to evaluate and develop traffic light policies resulting from a delicate balance between health benefits and economic implications.

Background: The best response and survival outcomes between advanced melanoma patients treated with the anti-PD-1 monotherapy vary greatly, rendering a risk model in need to optimally stratify patients based on their likelihood to benefit from the said treatment. Methods: We performed an ad hoc analysis of 89 advanced melanoma patients treated with the anti-PD-1 monotherapy from two prospective clinical trials at the Peking University Cancer Hospital from April 2016 to May 2018. Clinicodemographical characteristics, baseline and early-on-treatment (median 0.6 months after anti-PD-1 monotherapy initiation) routine laboratory variables, including complete blood count and general chemistry, and best response/survival data were extracted and analyzed in both univariate and multivariate logistic and Cox proportional hazard models. Results: After three rounds of screening, risk factors associated with a poorer PFS included a high pre-treatment neutrophil, derived neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (dNLR), low pre-treatment hemoglobin, and low early-on-/pre-treatment fold change of eosinophil; those with a poorer OS included a high pre-treatment neutrophil, eosinophil, PLT, early-on/pre-treatment fold change of LDH and neutrophil; and those with a poorer best response included a high pre-treatment NLR and early-on-/pre-treatment LDH fold change. Risk models (scale: low, median-low, median high, and high risk) were established based on these risk factors as dichotomous variables and M stage (with vs. without distant metastasis) for PFS (HR 1.976, 95% CI, 1.507-2.592, P < 0.001), OS (HR 2.348, 95% CI, 1.688-3.266), and non-responder (OR 3.586, 95% CI, 1.668-7.713, P = 0.001), respectively. For patients with low, median-low, median-high, and high risks of developing disease progression (PD), six-month PFS rates were 64.3% (95% CI, 43.5-95.0%), 37.5% (95% CI, 22.4-62.9%), 9.1% (95% CI, 3.1-26.7%), and 0%, respectively. For patients with OS risks of low, median-low, median-high, and high, OS rates at 12 months were 82.5% (95% CI, 63.1-100%), 76.6% (95% CI, 58.4-100%), 42.1% (95% CI, 26.3-67.3%), and 23.9% (95% CI, 11.1-51.3%), respectively. For patients with risks of low, median-low, median-high, and high of being a non-responder, objective response rates were 50.0% (95% CI, 15.7-84.3%), 27.8% (95% CI, 9.7-53.5%), 10.3% (95% CI, 2.9-24.2%), and 0%, respectively. Conclusion: A risk scoring model based on the clinicodemographical characteristics and easily obtainable routinely tested laboratory biomarkers may facilitate the best response and survival outcome prediction and personalized therapeutic decision making for the anti-PD-1 monotherapy treated advanced melanoma patients in Asia.

CTLA-4 blockade by means of ipilimumab (IPI) potentiates the immune response and improves overall survival (OS) in a minority of metastatic melanoma (MM) patients. We investigated the role of soluble CTLA-4 (sCTLA-4) as a possible biomarker for identifying this subset of patients. sCTLA-4 levels were analyzed at baseline in sera from 113 IPI-treated MM patients by ELISA, and the median value (200 pg/ml) was used to create two equally sized subgroups. Associations of sCTLA-4 with best overall response (BOR) to IPI and immune-related adverse events (irAEs) were evaluated through logistic regression. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression methods were used to analyze OS. A remarkable association between sCTLA-4 levels and BOR was found. Specifically, the proportion of patients with sCTLA-4 > 200 pg/ml in irSD or irPD (immune-related stable or progressive disease) was, respectively, 80% (OR = 0.23; 95%CL = 0.03-1.88) and 89% (OR = 0.11; 95%CL = 0.02-0.71) and was lower than that observed among patients in irCR/irPR (immune-related complete/partial response). sCTLA-4 levels increased during IPI treatment, since the proportion of patients showing sCTLA > 200 pg/ml after 3 cycles was 4 times higher (OR = 4.41, 95%CL = 1.02-19.1) than that after 1 cycle. Moreover, a significantly lower death rate was estimated for patients with sCTLA-4 > 200 pg/ml (HR = 0.61, 95%CL = 0.39-0.98). Higher baseline sCTLA-4 levels were also associated with the onset of any irAE (p value = 0.029), in particular irAEs of the digestive tract (p value = 0.041). In conclusion, our results suggest that high sCTLA-4 serum levels might predict favorable clinical outcome and higher risk of irAEs in IPI-treated MM patients.

Immunoglobulin (Ig) heavy/light chain (HLC) assays enable the separate quantification of the different light chain types of each Ig class. We retrospectively analyzed the correlation of heavy/light chain ratio (HLCR) with clinical status and its impact on outcome in 120 patients with multiple myeloma (MM). Abnormal HLCR was seen more frequently in patients with poorer myeloma response, and it appeared to be more sensitive for detecting clonality in IgA myeloma compared to IgG myeloma after treatment. Among the 85 patients who achieved ≥VGPR, the patients remained HLCR abnormal were showed significantly shorter overall survival (OS) compared to those achieving a normal HLCR (not reached vs 55.5 months, P = 0.032). This correlation was seen in IgA myeloma patients (not reached vs 30.1 months, P = 0.014), but not in IgG myeloma patients when patients were analyzed separately. Univariate and multivariate analysis of factors that may affect survival identified abnormal HLCR at the best response as the only independent risk factor (hazard ratio, 4.7; 95% confidence interval, 1.4 - 15.26; P = 0.012) for shorter OS in this subset of patients. This study highlighted the HLC assay as a prognostic predictor in patients with IgA myeloma.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the prognostic significances of not only the initial and the best response during repeated transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but if eligible, also the time point of achieving treatment responses.
Three hundred and fourteen treatment-naïve patients with well-preserved liver function undergoing TACE were recruited. Treatment responses were assessed using modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Overall survival (OS) was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier methods, and Cox regression analysis was performed for multivariate analysis.
After adjusting other variables, objective response (complete response [CR] and partial response [PR]) as the initial response (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.410) and the best response (adjusted HR 0.335) had independent prognostic significances for OS, respectively (both p < 0.001). Objective responders as the initial response had the longest OS, followed by patients who subsequently achieved objective response after at least two sessions and those who did not achieve objective response during treatment course eventually (52.6, 27.0, and 10.8 months, respectively; log-rank test, p < 0.001). Likewise, patients with CR as the initial response had the longest OS, followed by those who subsequently achieved CR after at least two sessions and those who achieved PR as the best response (70.2, 40.6, and 23.0 months, respectively; log-rank test, p < 0.001). Large (>5 cm) and multiple (⩾ 4) tumors were independently associated with failure to achieve CR after the initial TACE (both p < 0.05).
Both the initial and the best response predicts OS effectively. However, achievement of treatment response at an early time point is still the most robust predictor for favorable outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: We assessed the clinical implications of the best response compared with the initial response during repeated transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
METHODS: We evaluated 332 patients with intermediate-stage HCC and preserved liver function initially treated with repeated TACE. All had ≥1 lesion measuring ≥1 cm, and the response measured after each session was based on EASL and mRECIST criteria. We performed survival analyses according to response kinetics, and identified clinical factors associated with the need for repeated TACE to achieve the best response.
RESULTS: An objective response, either a complete response (CR) or a partial response (PR), after the first TACE was seen in about 50% of patients by both EASL and mRECIST. In terms of the best response during serial TACE, 250 patients (75.3%) by EASL and 278 (83.7%) by mRECIST were overall responders. The sizes of the largest and second largest tumors were the only parameters positively correlated with the number of TACE sessions required to achieve the best response (p<0.05). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that achieving a CR or PR as the best response was the best predictor of survival following TACE with a hazard ratio of 0.45 by EASL and 0.24 by mRECIST, and more than 0.69 and 0.71, respectively for initial responders (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The best response observed during serial TACE, rather than the initial response, most strongly predicts the survival of patients with intermediate-stage HCC. The number of TACE sessions needed to achieve a best response is a function of tumor size.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the antitumor activity of enzastaurin in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphomas: T-cell lymphoma (n = 23): cutaneous and peripheral T-cell lymphoma; indolent B-cell lymphomas (n = 19): small lymphocytic, follicular grade 1 or 2, marginal zone lymphomas; and aggressive B-cell lymphomas (n = 15): follicular lymphomas grade 3, aggressive lymphoma with a clinical history. The primary objective was to determine overall tumor response. Secondary objectives included duration of response and safety.
METHODS: In this multicenter, open-label, noncomparative, screening study conducted between December 2007 and February 2009, patients (≥ 18 years) who relapsed after ≥ 1 prior systemic treatment or who were intolerant to standard systemic therapy received 250 mg oral enzastaurin (125 mg tablets twice a day; a 1125-mg loading dose on day 1), in 28-day cycles for up to 2 years unless unacceptable toxicity or progressive disease occurred.
RESULTS: Responses were seen in follicular lymphomas grade 3 (1/5, 20.0%), cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (2/11, 18.2%), small lymphocytic lymphomas (1/7, 14.3%), and aggressive lymphoma with a clinical history (1/10, 10.0%) in this heavily pretreated patient population (median prior therapies range from 4 to 10). Most drug-related toxicities were grade 1/2, the most common being diarrhea, peripheral edema, and pruritus.
CONCLUSIONS: Enzastaurin was well tolerated but demonstrated modest responses across subgroups in this heavily pretreated patient population.