High-dose therapy followed by autologous hematopoietic cell transplant (AHCT) remains a viable consolidation strategy for a subset of patients with relapsed or refractory (R/R) lymphomas. BEAM (carmustine, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan) is widely recognized as the predominant conditioning regimen due to its satisfactory efficacy and tolerability. Nevertheless, shortages of carmustine and melphalan have compelled clinicians to explore alternative conditioning regimens. The aim of this study was to compare the toxicity and transplant outcomes following BEAM, CBV (carmustine, etoposide, cyclophosphamide), BuMel (busulfan, melphalan), and BendaEAM (bendamustine, etoposide, cytarabine, melphalan). We retrospectively analyzed data from 213 patients (CBV 65, BuMel 42, BEAM 68, BendaEAM 38) with R/R lymphomas undergoing AHCT between 2014 and 2020. Multivariate models were employed to evaluate toxicity and transplant outcomes based on conditioning type. Among grade III to IV toxicities, oral mucositis was more frequently observed with BuMel (45%) and BendaEAM (24%) compared to BEAM (15%) and CVB (6%, P ≤ .001). Diarrhea was more common with BendaEAM (42%) and less frequent with BuMel (7%, P = .01). Acute kidney injury was only found after BendaEAM (11%). Febrile neutropenia and infectious complications were more frequent following BendaEAM. Frequencies of other treatment-related toxicities did not significantly differ according to conditioning type. BendaEAM (odds ratio [OR] 3.07, P = .014) and BuMel (OR 4.27, P = .002) were independently associated with higher grade III to IV toxicity up to D+100. However, there were no significant differences in relapse/progression, nonrelapse mortality, progression-free survival, or overall survival among the four regimens. BuMel and BendaEAM were associated with a higher rate of grade III to IV toxicity. Carmustine-based regimens appeared to be less toxic and safer; however, there were no significant differences in transplant outcomes. The utilization of alternative preparative regimens due to drug shortages may potentially lead to increased toxicity after AHCT for lymphoma.

BACKGROUND: The global impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has resulted in significant morbidity and mortality. Immunocompromised patients, particularly those treated for B-cell lymphoma, have shown an increased risk of persistent infection with SARS-CoV-2 and severe outcomes and mortality. Multi-mutational SARS-CoV-2 variants can arise during the course of such persistent cases of COVID-19. No optimal, decisive strategy is currently available for patients with persistent infection that allows clinicians to sustain viral clearance, determine optimal timing to stop treatment, and prevent virus reactivation. We introduced a novel treatment combining antivirals, neutralizing antibodies, and genomic analysis with frequent monitoring of spike-specific antibody and viral load for immunocompromised patients with persistent COVID-19 infection. The aim of this retrospective study was to report and evaluate the efficacy of our novel treatment for immunocompromised B-cell lymphoma patients with persistent COVID-19 infection.
METHODS: This retrospective descriptive analysis had no controls. Patients with B-cell lymphoma previously receiving immunotherapy including anti-CD20 antibodies, diagnosed as having COVID-19 infection, and treated in our hospital after January 2022 were included. We selected anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies according to subvariants. Every 5 days, viral load was tested by RT-PCR, with antivirals continued until viral shedding was confirmed. Primary outcome was virus elimination. Independent predictors of prolonged viral shedding time were determined by multivariate Cox regression.
RESULTS: Forty-four patients were included in this study. Thirty-five patients received rituximab, 19 obinutuzumab, and 26 bendamustine. Median treatment duration was 10 (IQR, 10-20) days; 22 patients received combination antiviral therapy. COVID-19 was severe in 16 patients, and critical in 2. All patients survived, with viral shedding confirmed at median 28 (IQR, 19-38) days. Bendamustine use or within 1 year of last treatment for B-cell lymphoma, and multiple treatment lines for B-cell lymphoma significantly prolonged time to viral shedding.
CONCLUSIONS: Among 44 consecutive patients treated, anti-SARS-CoV-2 monoclonal antibodies and long-term administration of antiviral drugs, switching, and combination therapy resulted in virus elimination and 100% survival. Bendamustine use, within 1 year of last treatment for B-cell lymphoma, and multiple treatment lines for B-cell lymphoma were the significant independent predictors of prolonged viral shedding time.

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the second most common non-Hodgkin lymphoma in Western countries after diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Most patients with FL present with asymptomatic disease. Survival rates have been rising over time mainly due to advancing therapeutic strategiesA-51-year-old male with a history of well-controlled diabetes mellitus treated with insulin presented to the policlinic of hematology-medical oncology with worsening right inguinal lymphadenopathy for >3 months. He had no complaints of prolonged fever, night sweat, or weight loss. Initial physical examination revealed a healthy male with bulky right inguinal lymphadenopathy. The patient was then referred to a surgeon, and excisional biopsy of the enlarged right inguinal lymph nodes was performed. Therefore, stage II bulky symptomatic low-grade FL was established. We administered chemoimmunotherapy with rituximab and bendamustine every 3 weeks for six cycles. The patient tolerated the treatment well and completed six cycles of chemoimmunotherapy, and the follow-up FDG PET/CT showed complete remission of the disease.The patient achieved complete remission after series of chemoimmunotherapy with Bendamustine-Rituximab. Future assessment is still required for this patient to ensure the remission status of the lymphoma.

OBJECTIVE: To date, therapeutic options for T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL) remain very limited. This study evaluated the efficacy of monotherapies and combination therapies including a selective BCL-2 inhibitor for T-ALL cell lines, namely Jurkat, CCRF-CEM, and Loucy.
METHODS: Loucy is an early T-precursor ALL (ETP-ALL) cell line characterized by an immature phenotype, whereas Jurkat and CCRF-CEM are late T-cell progenitor ALL (LTP-ALL) cell lines. Monotherapy was conducted with venetoclax, cytarabine, bendamustine, or azacytidine, whereas combination therapy was performed with venetoclax plus cytarabine, venetoclax plus bendamustine, or venetoclax plus azacytidine. Cell viability assay was conducted after 48 h using Trypan blue and the 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS). Statistical analysis for evaluating synergistic interactions between anticancer drugs was performed by using the SynergyFinder Plus and drc R package.
RESULTS: Adding venetoclax to cytarabine, bendamustine, or azacitidine achieved an additive effect, with Loewe synergic scores ranging from -10 to 10 in Jurkat and CCRF-CEM. Conversely, the combination of venetoclax and cytarabine displayed an additive effect (Loewe synergic score: 8.45 and 5.82 with MTS and Trypan blue assays, respectively), whereas venetoclax plus bendamustine or azacitidine exhibited a synergistic effect (Loewe synergic score >10 with MTS assay) in Loucy. Remarkably, the Bliss/Loewe score revealed that the combination of venetoclax and bendamustine was the most synergistic, yielding a score of 13.832±0.55.
CONCLUSIONS: The combination of venetoclax and bendamustine demonstrated the greatest synergistic effect in suppressing ETP-ALL cell proliferation. Further studies are warranted to determine the mechanisms for the synergism between venetoclax and bendamustine in high-risk T-ALL.

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to analyze potential differences in antitumor efficacy and pharmacokinetics between intravenous (IV) bendamustine and a novel orally administered (PO) bendamustine agent that is utilizing the beneficial properties of superstaturated solid dispersions formulated in nanoparticles.
METHODS: Pharmacokinetics of IV versus PO bendamustine were determined by analysis of plasma samples collected from NSG mice treated with either IV or PO bendamustine. Plasma samples were analyzed using liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry following a liquid-liquid extraction to determine peak bendamustine concentration, area under the concentration-time curve, and the half-life in-vivo. In-vitro cytotoxicity of bendamustine against human non-Hodgkin Burkitt\'s Lymphoma (Raji), multiple myeloma (MM.1s), and B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (RS4;11) cell lines was determined over time using MTS assays. Luciferase-tagged versions of the aforementioned cell lines were used to determine in-vivo bendamustine cytotoxicity of IV versus PO bendamustine at two different doses.
RESULTS: Bendamustine at a high dose in-vitro causes cell death. There was no significant difference in antitumor activity between IV and novel PO bendamustine at a physiologically relevant concentration in all three xenograft models. In-vivo pharmacokinetics showed the oral bioavailability of bendamustine in mice to be 51.4%.
CONCLUSIONS: The novel oral bendamustine agent tested exhibits good oral bioavailability and systemic exposure for in-vivo antitumor efficacy comparable to IV bendamustine. An oral bendamustine formulation offers exciting clinical potential as an additional method of administration for bendamustine and warrants further evaluation in clinical studies.

Extranodal marginal zone lymphoma (EMZL) encompasses 70% of cases of marginal zone lymphoma. Frontline bendamustine and rituximab (BR) were derived from trials involving other indolent non-Hodgkin\'s lymphomas. Only one trial has evaluated frontline BR prospectively in EMZL. This retrospective study reports outcomes among EMZL patients receiving frontline BR. Twenty-five patients were included with a median age of 69 years (40-81). Five (20.0%) patients had stage I/II disease, and 20 (80.0%) had stage III/IV disease. The median number of cycles was 6.0 (3.0-6.0). Maintenance rituximab was administered to 10 (41.7%) individuals. Overall response rate (ORR) was 100.0% (60.0% complete response, 40.0% partial response). Medians of overall survival and progression-free survival were not reached. The estimated 2-year progression-free survival was 85.2% and overall survival was 100.0%. Four (16.6%) patients had infections related to treatment; 3 (12.0%) transformed to diffuse large B-cell lymphoma; 5 (20.8%) had a relapse or progression of EMZL; and 3 (12.0%) died unrelated to BR. BR is an efficacious and well-tolerated front-line regimen for EMZL with response data consistent with existing literature.

A 69-year-old man was diagnosed with follicular lymphoma (Grade 3A). Obinutuzumab combined with bendamustine (OB) therapy was initiated as salvage chemotherapy. Nausea, abdominal pain, and hyponatremia appeared after six courses of OB therapy; cytomegalovirus (CMV) enteritis with primary adrenal insufficiency (PAI) was a complication. Ganciclovir and hydrocortisone were administered, and the clinical findings improved. PAI caused by CMV infection has mainly been reported in patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome. In the present case, the PAI triggered by CMV infection led to immunodeficiency after chemotherapy.

Objective: Bendamustine was approved for treating chronic lymphocytic leukemia and indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Despite its therapeutic benefits, the long-term safety of bendamustine in a large population remains inadequately understood. This study evaluates the adverse events (AEs) associated with bendamustine, using a real-world pharmacovigilance database to support its clinical application. Methods: We conducted a post-marketing risk analysis to assess the association between bendamustine and its AEs. Data were extracted from the US FDA\'s Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS), covering the period from January 2017 to September 2023. The characteristics of bendamustine-associated AEs and the onset time were further analyzed. Statistical analysis was performed using MYSQL 8.0, Navicat Premium 15, Microsoft EXCEL 2016, and Minitab 21.0. Results: 9,461,874 reports were collected from the FAERS database, 9,131 identified bendamustine as the \"primary suspected\" drug. We identified 331 significant disproportionality preferred terms (PTs). Common AEs included pyrexia, neutropenia, infusion site reaction, progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), injection site vasculitis, and pneumonia-all documented on bendamustine\'s label. Notably, 16 unexpected and significant AEs were discovered, including hypogammaglobulinemia, which is concerning due to its potential to increase infection susceptibility following bendamustine treatment. Other significant findings were anaphylactic reactions, PML, and cutaneous malignancies, suggesting updates to the drug\'s label may be necessary. Physicians should monitor for neurological and skin changes in patients and discontinue treatment if PML is suspected. Moreover, the median onset time for bendamustine-associated AEs was 13 days, with an interquartile range [IQR] of 0-59 days, predominantly occurring on the first day post-initiation. The β of bendamustine-related AEs suggested risk reduction over time. Conclusion: Our study uncovered some potential pharmacovigilance signals for bendamustine, providing important insights for its safe and effective clinical use.

暂无摘要。

This report highlights the risk of latent tuberculosis (TB) reactivation after treatment with Polatuzumab Vedotin (PV), Rituximab, and Bendamustine (PBR protocol) despite appropriate chemoprophylaxis. A 48-year-old male with refractory Burkitt\'s lymphoma (BKL) was treated with PBR protocol. At baseline, the patient had a negative QuantiFERON test result, which turned out to be positive prior to starting PBR. He received chemoprophylaxis for 9 months and was compliant with treatment. One year later, he was admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia and was treated according to the protocol. His symptoms persisted for 1 month. Investigations yielded disseminated TB-infiltrated bone marrow and pleura. Downstream B-cell and T-cell depletion secondary to CD20 and CD79b antagonism may potentially explain the increased risk of TB reactivation associated with the combination of PV and rituximab. Further research is necessary to monitor the risk of TB reactivation among patients receiving a combination of PV and rituximab, especially in endemic areas with high prevalence and incidence of TB.