Bayesian network meta-analysis

贝叶斯网络元分析
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着年龄的增长,血脂异常成为中老年人群常见的健康问题,构成心血管疾病的重大风险。有氧运动,作为一种非药物干预措施,被认为是有效改善血脂水平,但不同类型的有氧运动对血脂的影响程度尚不清楚。本研究旨在探讨12种不同有氧运动对总胆固醇的影响,甘油三酯,高密度脂蛋白胆固醇,对45岁及以上中老年人低密度脂蛋白胆固醇水平进行系统评价和贝叶斯网络随机对照试验的Meta分析。我们系统地检索了相关数据库,纳入了符合条件的随机对照试验。采用贝叶斯网络meta分析比较12种有氧运动对血脂水平的影响。共纳入487项涉及45岁以上中老年人群的随机对照试验。网络meta分析结果显示,与未干预的中老年人相比,所有类型的有氧运动均能降低血脂水平。就总胆固醇而言,甘油三酯,低密度脂蛋白胆固醇,游泳效果最显著。对于HDL胆固醇,舞蹈表现出更好的效果。研究表明,游泳和跳舞对改善中老年人的血脂水平有积极作用。建议根据个人喜好和身体状况选择合适的运动类型。
    With increasing age, dyslipidemia becomes a common health problem in the middle-aged and elderly population, posing a significant risk of cardiovascular disease. Aerobic exercise, as a non-pharmacological intervention, is considered to be effective in improving blood lipid levels, but the extent to which different types of aerobic exercise affect blood lipids is not clear. This study aims to investigate the effects of 12 different aerobic exercises on total cholesterol, triglyceride, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in middle-aged and elderly people aged 45 years and over through systematic review and Bayesian network Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. We systematically searched relevant databases and included eligible randomized controlled trials. Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to compare the effects of 12 types of aerobic exercise on lipid levels. A total of 487 randomized controlled trials involving middle-aged and elderly people over 45 years old were included. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that all types of aerobic exercise could reduce blood lipid levels compared with no intervention in middle-aged and elderly people. In terms of total cholesterol, triglyceride, and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, swimming had the most significant effect. For HDL cholesterol, dance showed a better effect. Studies have shown that swimming and dancing have a positive effect on improving blood lipid levels in middle-aged and elderly people. It is recommended to choose the appropriate type of exercise according to personal preference and physical condition.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    研究帕金森氏病PD中用于缓解Timedup和Go(TUG)的特定类型运动之间的剂量-反应关系。
    系统评价和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。
    PubMed,Medline,Embase,PsycINFO,科克伦图书馆,和WebofScience从一开始一直搜索到2月5日,2024.
    使用具有MBNMA包的R软件进行数据分析。结果指标的影响大小表示为平均偏差(MD)和95%置信区间(95%CrI)。网络中的偏倚风险由两名审阅者使用ROB2独立评估。
    总共73项研究,涉及3,354名PD患者。本文讨论了在各种运动类型中改善PD患者TUG表现的剂量反应关系。值得注意的是,水产(AQE),混合运动(Mul_C),感觉运动(SE),和阻力训练(RT)证明有效剂量范围,AQE最佳为1500MET-min/周(MD:-8.359,95%CI:-1.398至-2.648),Mul_C在1000METs-min/周(MD:-4.551,95%CI:-8.083至-0.946),SE为1200MET-min/周(MD:-5.145,95%CI:-9.643至-0.472),RT为610METs-min/周(MD:-2.187,95%CI:-3.161至-1.278),分别。然而,没有发现有效的有氧运动剂量(AE),平衡步态训练(BGT),跳舞,和跑步机训练(TT)。身心锻炼(MBE)的有效范围为130至750METs-min/周,最佳剂量为750METs-min/周(MD:-2.822,95%CI:-4.604至-0.996)。根据等级制度,纳入研究的证据总体质量为中等水平.
    本研究确定了能显著增强PD患者TUG表现的特定运动方式和剂量。AQE成为最有效的模式,最佳剂量为1,500METs-min/周。MBE在较低剂量下显示出显着的益处,迎合不同运动能力的患者。RT表现出微妙的“U形”剂量反应关系,建议最佳的范围平衡功效和过度训练的风险。这些发现倡导PD管理中量身定制的锻炼计划,强调个性化处方以最大化结果。系统审查注册:国际前瞻性系统审查注册(PROSPERO)(CRD42024506968)。
    UNASSIGNED: To examine the dose-response relationship between specific types of exercise for alleviating Timed up and Go (TUG) in Parkinson\'s disease PD.
    UNASSIGNED: Systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Medline, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from inception until February 5th, 2024.
    UNASSIGNED: Data analysis was conducted using R software with the MBNMA package. Effect sizes of outcome indicators were expressed as mean deviation (MD) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CrI). The risk of bias in the network was evaluated independently by two reviewers using ROB2.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 73 studies involving 3,354 PD patients. The text discusses dose-response relationships in improving TUG performance among PD patients across various exercise types. Notably, Aquatic (AQE), Mix Exercise (Mul_C), Sensory Exercise (SE), and Resistance Training (RT) demonstrate effective dose ranges, with AQE optimal at 1500 METs-min/week (MD: -8.359, 95% CI: -1.398 to -2.648), Mul_C at 1000 METs-min/week (MD: -4.551, 95% CI: -8.083 to -0.946), SE at 1200 METs-min/week (MD: -5.145, 95% CI: -9.643 to -0.472), and RT at 610 METs-min/week (MD: -2.187, 95% CI: -3.161 to -1.278), respectively. However, no effective doses are found for Aerobic Exercise (AE), Balance Gait Training (BGT), Dance, and Treadmill Training (TT). Mind-body exercise (MBE) shows promise with an effective range of 130 to 750 METs-min/week and an optimal dose of 750 METs-min/week (MD: -2.822, 95% CI: -4.604 to -0.996). According to the GRADE system, the included studies\' overall quality of the evidence was identified moderate level.
    UNASSIGNED: This study identifies specific exercise modalities and dosages that significantly enhance TUG performance in PD patients. AQE emerges as the most effective modality, with an optimal dosage of 1,500 METs-min/week. MBE shows significant benefits at lower dosages, catering to patients with varying exercise capacities. RT exhibits a nuanced \"U-shaped\" dose-response relationship, suggesting an optimal range balancing efficacy and the risk of overtraining. These findings advocate for tailored exercise programs in PD management, emphasizing personalized prescriptions to maximize outcomes.Systematic Review Registration: International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (CRD42024506968).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:微创手术治疗局部进展期胃癌(AGC)存在争议。这项研究的目的是对可切除的远端胃癌的主要手术治疗方法进行全面评估。
    方法:系统评价和随机对照试验(RCTs)网络荟萃分析。打开(Op-DG),腹腔镜辅助(LapAs-DG),完全腹腔镜(Lap-DG),与机器人远端胃切除术(Rob-DG)进行比较。集合效应大小度量是风险比(RR),加权平均差(WMD),和95%可信区间(CrIs)。
    结果:共纳入10个RCTs(3823例)。总的来说,1012(26.5%)接受了Lap-DG,902(23.6%)LapAs-DG,1768(46.2%)Op-DG,和141(3.7%)罗布-DG。吻合口漏,严重并发症(Clavien-Dindo>3),和院内死亡率相当.再手术率无差异,肺部并发症,术后出血需要输血,手术部位感染,心血管并发症,收集的淋巴结数量,和无瘤切除边缘。与Op-DG相比,Lap-DG和LapAs-DG显示出术中失血量显着减少,首次排气时间更短,住院时间缩短。
    结论:LapAs-DG,Lap-DG,由专职外科医生在转诊中心进行的Rob-DG的短期结局与Op-DG的本地AGC相当.
    BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery for the treatment of locally advanced gastric cancer (AGC) is debated. The aim of this study was to execute a comprehensive assessment of principal surgical treatments for resectable distal gastric cancer.
    METHODS: Systematic review and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) network meta-analysis. Open (Op-DG), laparoscopic-assisted (LapAs-DG), totally laparoscopic (Lap-DG), and robotic distal gastrectomy (Rob-DG) were compared. Pooled effect-size measures were the risk ratio (RR), the weighted mean difference (WMD), and the 95% credible intervals (CrIs).
    RESULTS: Ten RCTs (3823 patients) were included. Overall, 1012 (26.5%) underwent Lap-DG, 902 (23.6%) LapAs-DG, 1768 (46.2%) Op-DG, and 141 (3.7%) Rob-DG. Anastomotic leak, severe complications (Clavien-Dindo > 3), and in-hospital mortality were comparable. No differences were observed for reoperation rate, pulmonary complications, postoperative bleeding requiring transfusion, surgical-site infection, cardiovascular complications, number of harvested lymph nodes, and tumor-free resection margins. Compared to Op-DG, Lap-DG and LapAs-DG showed a significantly reduced intraoperative blood loss with a trend toward shorter time to first flatus and reduced length of stay.
    CONCLUSIONS: LapAs-DG, Lap-DG, and Rob-DG performed in referral centers by dedicated surgeons have comparable short-term outcomes to Op-DG for locally AGC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:靶向小分子药物治疗系统性红斑狼疮(SLE)引起了临床研究者越来越多的关注。然而,目前尚缺乏关于不同靶向小分子药物疗效和安全性差异的证据。因此,本研究旨在评估不同靶向小分子药物治疗SLE的疗效和安全性.
    方法:PubMed关于靶向小分子药物治疗SLE的随机对照试验(RCT),WebofScience,Embase,截至2023年4月25日,对Cochrane图书馆进行了系统搜索。使用Cochrane评估偏倚风险的工具对纳入研究进行偏倚风险评估。主要结果指标为SRI-4反应,BICLA的回应,和不良反应。因为在纳入的研究中使用了不同的剂量和疗程,采用贝叶斯网络meta回归分析不同剂量和疗程对疗效和安全性的影响。
    结果:共纳入13项研究,涉及3,622名患者和9种靶向小分子药物。网络荟萃分析结果表明,在改善SRI-4方面,Deucravitinib明显优于Baricitinib(RR=1.32,95%CI(1.04,1.68),P<0.05)。Deucravitinib在改善BICLA反应方面显著优于安慰剂(RR=1.55,95%CI(1.20,2.02),P<0.05)。在不良反应方面,与安慰剂相比,靶向小分子药物未显著增加不良事件的风险(P>0.05).
    结论:根据本研究获得的证据,与安慰剂相比,靶向小分子药物的疗效差异具有统计学意义,但安全性差异无统计学意义。剂量和疗程对靶向小分子药物的疗效影响不大。Deucravitinib可显著改善BICLA反应和SRI-4反应,而不会显著增加AE的风险。因此,Deucravitinib很可能是最好的干预措施。由于纳入研究的数量较少,需要更多高质量的临床证据来进一步验证靶向小分子药物治疗SLE的有效性和安全性.
    BACKGROUND: Targeted small-molecule drugs in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) have attracted increasing attention from clinical investigators. However, there is still a lack of evidence on the difference in the efficacy and safety of different targeted small-molecule drugs. Therefore, this study was conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of different targeted small-molecule drugs for SLE.
    METHODS: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on targeted small-molecule drugs in the treatment of SLE in PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were systematically searched as of April 25, 2023. Risk of bias assessment was performed for included studies using the Cochrane\'s tool for evaluating the risk of bias. The primary outcome indicators were SRI-4 response, BICLA response, and adverse reaction. Because different doses and courses of treatment were used in the included studies, Bayesian network meta-regression was used to investigate the effect of different doses and courses of treatment on efficacy and safety.
    RESULTS: A total of 13 studies were included, involving 3,622 patients and 9 targeted small-molecule drugs. The results of network meta-analysis showed that, in terms of improving SRI-4, Deucravacitinib was significantly superior to that of Baricitinib (RR = 1.32, 95% CI (1.04, 1.68), P < 0.05). Deucravacitinib significantly outperformed the placebo in improving BICLA response (RR = 1.55, 95% CI (1.20, 2.02), P < 0.05). In terms of adverse reactions, targeted small-molecule drugs did not significantly increase the risk of adverse events as compared to placebo (P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Based on the evidence obtained in this study, the differences in the efficacy of targeted small-molecule drugs were statistically significant as compared to placebo, but the difference in the safety was not statistically significant. The dose and the course of treatment had little impact on the effect of targeted small-molecule drugs. Deucravacitinib could significantly improve BICLA response and SRI-4 response without significantly increasing the risk of AEs. Therefore, Deucravacitinib is very likely to be the best intervention measure. Due to the small number of included studies, more high-quality clinical evidence is needed to further verify the efficacy and safety of targeted small-molecule drugs for SLE.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较疗效,安全,和其他较新的抗癫痫药物(ASM),包括brivaracetam的耐受性,艾司利卡西平,拉科沙胺,Perampanel,和唑尼沙胺,批准用于成人癫痫患者的耐药性局灶性发作性癫痫发作(FOS)的辅助治疗。
    方法:进行系统文献综述(SLR)以获得相关疗效,安全,ASM治疗耐药FOS的耐受性数据。所有研究均全面评估异质性的潜在来源,并通过贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA)进行分析。在维持期内,疗效结果为≥50%的应答率和癫痫发作自由度,使用多项贝叶斯NMA同时建模。安全性和耐受性结果是经历至少一个治疗紧急不良事件(TEAE)的患者比例和经历至少一个导致停药的TEAE的患者比例。
    结果:SLR确定了76项研究,其中23个被包括在贝叶斯NMA中。与所有分析的ASM相比,Cenobamate在≥50%的应答率和癫痫发作自由结局方面具有统计学意义的较高比率。点估计表明,与布立拉西坦相比,西诺巴特与经历至少一种TEAE和至少一种TEAE导致停药的更高比率相关。拉科沙胺,和唑尼沙胺;然而,结果无统计学意义.
    结论:与所有分析的ASM相比,赛诺巴米特与疗效增加相关。安全性和耐受性结果没有统计学上的显着差异。提出的结果证实了从以前发表的NMA得出的结论,与其他ASM相比,这也突出了西诺坦的显着功效。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of cenobamate with other newer anti-seizure medications (ASMs) including brivaracetam, eslicarbazepine, lacosamide, perampanel, and zonisamide, approved for adjunctive treatment of drug-resistant focal-onset seizures (FOS) in adults with epilepsy.
    METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was conducted to obtain relevant efficacy, safety, and tolerability data for ASMs for the treatment of drug-resistant FOS. All studies were thoroughly assessed for potential sources of heterogeneity and analysed via Bayesian network meta-analyses (NMAs). Efficacy outcomes were ≥50 % responder rate and seizure freedom during the maintenance period, which were modelled simultaneously using a multinomial Bayesian NMA. Safety and tolerability outcomes were the proportion of patients who experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) and the proportion who experienced at least one TEAE leading to discontinuation.
    RESULTS: The SLR identified 76 studies, of which 23 were included in the Bayesian NMAs. Cenobamate was associated with statistically significant higher rates for the ≥50 % responder rate and seizure freedom outcomes compared with all ASMs analysed. The point estimates indicated that cenobamate was associated with higher rates of experiencing at least one TEAE and at least one TEAE leading to discontinuation compared with brivaracetam, lacosamide, and zonisamide; however, no results were statistically significant.
    CONCLUSIONS: Cenobamate was associated with increased efficacy compared with all ASMs analysed. There were no statistically significant differences in the safety and tolerability outcomes. The results presented corroborate the conclusions drawn from previous published NMAs, which also highlight the notable efficacy of cenobamate in comparison with other ASMs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目标:在全球抑郁症负担上升和传统抗抑郁治疗相关挑战的背景下,人们对探索替代疗法的疗效和安全性越来越感兴趣.本研究使用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析来严格评估中草药治疗抑郁症的治疗潜力,重点关注它们与标准药物干预措施的比较疗效和安全性。方法:五个数据库(PubMed,万方数据,EMBASE,CNKI,和Cochrane图书馆)和灰色文献从开始到2023年7月底进行搜索,以确定评估中草药治疗抑郁症的疗效和安全性的研究。响应率,汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD)评分,通过直接和间接比较评估不良事件发生率.精心进行数据提取和偏倚风险评估。统计分析采用马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗方法,效应大小估计值为奇数比及其95%置信区间。结果:共分析了198个RCT,涉及8,923例患者,评估17种中草药。SurfaceUndertheCumulativeRankingresultsindicatethatthetopthreetreatmentswiththebestresponserateispossiblyreepipiwan,EasePill,和柴胡加龙骨木里汤;HAMD评分降低的前三个治疗方法是柴胡舒肝散,醒脑解郁汤,和逍遥散;不良反应发生率最低的前3位治疗方法为逍遥散、阿普唑仑,和醒脑解郁汤。有趣的是,常用的合成药物如氟西汀,Escitalopram,阿米替林,舍曲林,氟哌噻吨和美利曲辛,和文拉法辛,不仅似乎不如特定的中草药(甘麦大枣汤,柴胡甲龙骨木里汤,柴胡舒干三,丹芝-逍遥散,和醒脑解郁汤),但它们也与显著较高的不良事件风险相关.结论:我们的发现阐明了中药作为治疗抑郁症的可行替代品的有希望的治疗潜力。某些草药显示出增强的疗效和安全性。这项研究的结果主张将这些替代方式整合到当代抑郁症管理范式中。然而,它强调了更大的必要性,方法稳健的试验,以进一步验证和完善这些初步发现。系统审查注册:https://www。crd.约克。AC.英国/PROSPERO/,标识符CRD42023452109。
    Objectives: Amidst rising global burden of depression and the associated challenges with conventional antidepressant therapies, there is a growing interest in exploring the efficacy and safety of alternative treatments. This study uses a Bayesian network meta-analysis to rigorously evaluate the therapeutic potential of Chinese herbal medicines in the treatment of depression, focusing on their comparative efficacy and safety against standard pharmacological interventions. Methods: Five databases (PubMed, Wanfang Data, EMBASE, CNKI, and the Cochrane Library) and grey literature were searched from inception to end of July 2023 to identify studies that assessed the efficacy and safety of Chinese herbal medicines in treating depression. The response rate, Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD) scores, and rates of adverse events were assessed through both direct and indirect comparisons. Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were meticulously performed. Statistical analysis used Markov chain Monte Carlo methods, with effect size estimates provided as odd ratios and their 95% confidence intervals. Results: A total of 198 RCTs involving 8,923 patients were analyzed, assessing 17 Chinese herbal medicines. Surface Under the Cumulative Ranking results indicated that the top three treatments with the best response rate were possibly Guipiwan, Ease Pill, and Chaihu Jia Longgu Muli Decoction; the top three treatments on the reduction of HAMD scores were Chai Hu Shu Gan San, Xingnao Jieyu Decoction, and Xiaoyao Powder; and the top three treatments with the lowest adverse effects rates were Xiaoyao Powder, Alprazolam, and Xingnao Jieyu Decoction. Interestingly, commonly used synthetic drugs such as Fluoxetine, Escitalopram, Amitriptyline, Sertraline, Flupentixol and Melitracen, and Venlafaxine, not only appeared to be less effective than specific Chinese herbal medicines (Gan Mai Da Zao Decoction, Chaihu Jia Longgu Muli Decoction, Chai Hu Shu Gan San, Danzhi-Xiaoyao-San, and Xingnao Jieyu Decoction), but they were also related to substantially higher risk of adverse events. Conclusion: Our findings elucidate the promising therapeutic potential of Chinese herbal medicines as viable alternatives in the treatment of depression, with certain herbs demonstrating enhanced efficacy and safety profiles. The outcomes of this study advocate for the integration of these alternative modalities into contemporary depression management paradigms. However, it underscores the necessity for larger, methodologically robust trials to further validate and refine these preliminary findings. Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42023452109.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于肉毒杆菌毒素A(BTA)注射是否可以缓解磨牙症引起的疼痛,存在不一致的证据。这项研究旨在评估BTA注射在不同随访时期缓解磨牙症引起的疼痛的效率。
    从2005年到2022年,使用与肉毒杆菌毒素和磨牙症相关的搜索词搜索了五个电子数据库。仅包括对照临床试验。两名调查人员审查了每篇文章,并讨论了任何分歧,直到达成共识。通过视觉模拟量表(VAS)评估的疼痛结果进行单臂和贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。汇总数据是通过随机效应模型测量的。
    共纳入365名磨牙症患者的11项研究。根据汇总数据的单臂分析,在VAS上,注射BTA后磨牙症相关疼痛的减少为4.06分(95%CI=3.37至4.75),治疗后第6个月疼痛缓解显著(P<0.01)。根据贝叶斯分析,BTA还导致明显更大的疼痛缓解比口腔夹板(平均差异(MD),-1.5;95%可信间隔(CrI)=-2.7至-0.19)或生理盐水注射(MD,-3.3;95%CrI=-6.2至-0.32)。
    BTA可显著缓解注射后6个月磨牙症的疼痛,其疗效高于口腔夹板。然而,有必要进行进一步的长期随访随机对照试验,比较BTA与其他管理或药物.
    UNASSIGNED: There is inconsistent evidence regarding whether the botulinum toxin A (BTA) injection can relieve pain caused by bruxism. This study aimed to estimate the efficiency of BTA injection in relieving pain caused by bruxism at different follow-up periods.
    UNASSIGNED: Five electronic databases were searched from 2005 to 2022 using search terms related to botulinum toxin and bruxism. Only controlled clinical trials were included. Two investigators reviewed each article and discussed any disagreements until a consensus was reached. Pain outcomes as evaluated by the visual analogue scale (VAS) were subjected to single-arm and Bayesian network meta-analyses. Pooling data were measured by a random-effects model.
    UNASSIGNED: Eleven studies with a total of 365 bruxism patients were included. According to the single-arm analyses of the pooled data, the reduction in bruxism-related pain after BTA injection measured 4.06 points (95% CI = 3.37 to 4.75) on the VAS, and the pain relief was significant in the first 6 months after treatment (P < 0.01). According to the Bayesian analysis, BTA also resulted in significantly greater pain relief than oral splinting (mean difference (MD), -1.5; 95% credible interval (CrI) = -2.7 to -0.19) or saline injection (MD, -3.3; 95% CrI = -6.2 to -0.32).
    UNASSIGNED: BTA significantly relieves the pain of bruxism for 6 months after injection, and its therapeutic efficacy was higher than that of oral splinting. Nevertheless, further long-term follow-up randomized controlled trials comparing BTA with other management or drugs are warranted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:数百项关于中药(CHD)的随机对照试验(RCT),包括麝香保心丸(BXP),复方丹参滴丸(DSP),复方丹参片(DST),速效九心丸(JXP),脑心通胶囊(NXT),通心络胶囊(TXL),和地奥心血康胶囊(XXK)和常规化学药物,如硝酸异山梨酯(ISDN),对心绞痛的治疗方法已有研究,但尚未通过符合PRISMA的网络荟萃分析(NMA)进行评估.
    目的:本研究旨在比较九种抗心绞痛药物通过NMA对RCT的疗效。
    方法:对成人心绞痛患者的症状和心电图改善进行药物治疗的随机对照试验。计算赔率比和95%可信间隔来测量效应大小。使用Cochrane偏倚风险工具评估RCT质量。用贝叶斯NMA进行证据合成。基本分析,包括亚组和敏感性分析,元回归分析,发表偏倚分析,并进行排名分析以评估疗效的稳健性。用等级方法评估证据强度。
    结果:总共选择了331个RCT,其中36,467名参与者,所有纳入RCT的总体质量较低。来自不同证据综合方法的总体疗效估计发现,BXP,TXL,DSP比DST和ISDN更有效。充分的必要分析表明一致的疗效估计,微不足道的出版偏见,和确凿的排名结果。总体等级证据强度较低。
    结论:这个全面的贝叶斯NMA发现BXP,TXL,和DSP将成为七个测试CHD中用于治疗患有心绞痛的成年患者的前三名。然而,随机对照试验的质量和证据强度较低。需要进一步的高质量RCT和更多的结局指标及其NMA。
    背景:PROSPEROCRD42014007035.
    BACKGROUND: Hundreds of randomized controlled trials (RCT) on Chinese herbal drugs (CHDs) including Shexiang baoxin pill (BXP), compound Danshen dripping pill (DSP), compound Danshen tablet (DST), Suxiao jiuxin pill (JXP), Naoxintong capsule (NXT), Tongxinluo capsule (TXL), and Di\'ao xinxuekang capsule (XXK) and conventional chemical drugs, such as isosorbide dinitrate (ISDN), for angina pectoris are available but have not been evaluated by a PRISMA-compliant network meta-analysis (NMA).
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the efficacy of nine anti-anginal drugs through NMA on RCTs.
    METHODS: RCTs of drug treatment for adult patients with angina pectoris for improvements in symptoms and electrocardiography were retrieved. Odds ratios and 95% credible intervals were computed to measure effect sizes. RCT quality was evaluated with the Cochrane risk of bias tool. Evidence synthesis was performed with Bayesian NMA. Essential analyses including subgroup analysis, sensitivity analysis, meta-regression analysis, publication bias analysis, and ranking analysis were conducted to assess the robustness of efficacies. Evidence strength was assessed with the GRADE approach.
    RESULTS: A total of 331 RCTs with 36,467 participants were eligible. The overall quality of all included RCTs was low. Overall efficacy estimates from different approaches of evidential synthesis found that BXP, TXL, and DSP were more efficacious than DST and ISDN. Essential analyses indicated consistent efficacy estimates, insignificant publication bias, and corroborative ranking results. The overall GRADE evidence strength was low.
    CONCLUSIONS: This comprehensive Bayesian NMA found BXP, TXL, and DSP to be the top three candidates among the seven tested CHDs for treating adults suffering from angina pectoris. However, the quality and the evidence strength of eligible RCTs were low. Further high-quality RCTs with more outcome measures and their NMAs are warranted.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42014007035.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    热消融(TA)方式,例如射频消融(RFA),微波消融(MWA),激光消融(LA)已广泛应用于甲状腺乳头状微小癌(PTMC)患者的治疗。根据以前的小样本荟萃分析,本网络meta旨在进一步比较这些热消融方法在PTMC患者中的疗效和安全性.
    中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI),万方,PubMed,Embase,并搜索了Cochrane图书馆数据库,以检索2022年5月之前发表的相关研究。疗效结果是复发和淋巴结转移(LNM),安全结果包括手术时间,术中失血,住院时间和并发症。选择纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表(NOS)进行偏倚风险评估。采用Stata14.0进行统计分析。
    共29篇。根据至少6个月的随访,我们的分析发现,MWA之间的所有疗效和安全性结果均无显著统计学差异,RFA,洛杉矶团体。此外,三种TA处理都产生了显著最少的手术时间,住院,且并发症优于手术组。此外,我们的研究发现RFA的并发症相对较少,LNM,手术时间和术中失血,与其他TA治疗相比。MWA显示复发概率最低,洛杉矶的住院时间最长。
    MWA,RFA,和LA都是PTMC患者的有效治疗策略,但不能完全取代传统的手术治疗。
    UNASSIGNED: Thermal ablation (TA) modalities such as radiofrequency ablation (RFA), microwave ablation (MWA), and laser ablation (LA) have been widely used in the treatment of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) patients. Based on previous small-sample meta-analyses, this network meta was designed to further compare the efficacy and safety of these thermal ablation methods in PTMC patients.
    UNASSIGNED: China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Wanfang, PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library databases were searched to retrieve relevant studies published before May 2022. The efficacy outcomes was recurrence and lymph node metastasis (LNM), the safety outcome included operation time, intra-operative blood loss, hospital stays and complications. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) was selected for the risk of bias assessment. Stata 14.0 was used for statistical analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Twenty-nine articles were included. Based on as least 6 months follow up, our analysis discovered no significant statistical differences in all efficacy and safety outcomes between MWA, RFA, and LA groups. Moreover, three TA treatments all produced significant least operation time, hospital stays, and complications than surgery group. Additionally, our study found that RFA showed relatively less complications, LNM, operation time and intra-operative blood loss, compared with other TA treatments. MWA indicated the lowest probability of recurrence, LA showed the longest hospital stays.
    UNASSIGNED: MWA, RFA, and LA are all effective treatment strategies for patients with PTMC, but could not completely replace conventional surgical treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    背景:再生技术结合髓芯减压(CD)通常用于治疗股骨头坏死(ONFH)。然而,对于再生疗法联合CD的效果最佳,尚无共识。因此,我们使用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析(NMA)评估了6种再生疗法联合CD治疗.
    方法:我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,科克伦图书馆,和WebofScience数据库。以CD为对照组,将六种常用的再生技术分为以下几组:(1)自体骨移植(ABG),(2)自体骨移植联合骨髓穿刺液浓缩液(ABG+BMAC),(3)骨髓穿刺液浓缩物(BMAC),(4)游离血管自体骨移植(FVBG),(5)扩增间充质干细胞(MSCs),和(6)富血小板血浆(PRP)。比较6种治疗方法的全髋关节置换术(THA)转化率和股骨头坏死进展率。
    结果:本研究共纳入17篇文献。在NMA,与CD:MSCs(比值比[OR]:0.098,95%置信区间[CI]:0.0087-0.87)和BMAC(OR:0.27,95%CI:0.073-0.73)相比,6种治疗策略中的2种在预防ONFH进展方面表现出更高的反应.此外,6种治疗策略中有2种是防止ONFH向THA:MSCs(OR:0.062,95%CI:0.0038-0.40)和BMAC(OR:0.32,95%CI:0.1-0.074)转化的有效技术.FVBG之间无显著差异,PRP,ABG+BMAC,ABG,和CD在预防ONFH进展和转化为THA方面(P>0.05)。
    结论:我们的NMA发现,在六种再生疗法中,MSCs和BMAC可有效预防ONFH进展和转化为THA。根据表面下的累计排名值,MSCs排名第一,其次是BMAC。此外,根据我们的NMA结果,CD后的MSC和BMAC可能是防止ONFH进展和转化为THA所必需的。因此,这些发现为使用再生疗法治疗ONFH提供了证据.
    BACKGROUND: Regenerative techniques combined with core decompression (CD) are commonly used to treat osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, no consensus exists on regeneration therapy combined with CD that performs optimally. Therefore, we evaluated six regenerative therapies combined with CD treatment using a Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA).
    METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Six common regeneration techniques were categorized into the following groups with CD as the control group: (1) autologous bone graft (ABG), (2) autologous bone graft combined with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (ABG + BMAC), (3) bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC), (4) free vascular autologous bone graft (FVBG), (5) expanded mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), and (6) platelet-rich plasma (PRP). The conversion rate to total hip arthroplasty (THA) and progression rate to femoral head necrosis were compared among the six treatments.
    RESULTS: A total of 17 literature were included in this study. In the NMA, two of the six treatment strategies demonstrated higher response in preventing the progression of ONFH than CD: MSCs (odds ratio [OR]: 0.098, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.0087-0.87) and BMAC (OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.073-0.73). Additionally, two of the six treatment strategies were effective techniques in preventing the conversion of ONFH to THA: MSCs (OR: 0.062, 95% CI: 0.0038-0.40) and BMAC (OR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.1-0.074). No significant difference was found among FVBG, PRP, ABG + BMAC, ABG, and CD in preventing ONFH progression and conversion to THA (P > 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Our NMA found that MSCs and BMAC were effective in preventing ONFH progression and conversion to THA among the six regenerative therapies. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking value, MSCs ranked first, followed by BMAC. Additionally, based on our NMA results, MSCs and BMAC following CD may be necessary to prevent ONFH progression and conversion to THA. Therefore, these findings provide evidence for the use of regenerative therapy for ONFH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号