Balloon angioplasty

球囊血管成形术
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    支架内再狭窄(ISR)占美国经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)的10%。在多项随机对照试验(RCT)中,紫杉醇涂层球囊(PCB)已被评估为冠状动脉ISR的治疗方法。我们搜索了PubMed/MEDLINE,科克伦图书馆,和ClinicalTrials.gov(从开始到2024年4月1日)用于RCT评估冠状动脉ISR患者的多氯联苯与无涂层球囊血管成形术(BA)。感兴趣的结果是靶病变血运重建(TLR),主要不良心血管事件(MACE),全因死亡率,心血管死亡率,心肌梗死(MI),和支架血栓形成。我们使用逆方差随机效应模型汇集了估计值。效应大小报告为风险比(RR),95%置信区间(CI)。共纳入6个RCT,1,343例患者。在随机分组后6-12个月的随访中,多氯联苯的使用与TLR的统计学显着降低相关(RR0.28;95%CI0.11至0.68),与BA相比,冠状动脉ISR的MACE(RR0.35;95%CI0.20至0.64)。然而,就全因死亡率而言,多氯联苯和BA之间的风险没有显着差异(RR0.56;95%CI0.14至2.31),心血管死亡率(RR0.61;95%CI0.02至16.85),MI(RR0.60;95%CI0.27至1.31),和支架内血栓形成(RR0.13;95%CI0.00至5.06)。总之,这项荟萃分析提示,与未涂层的BA相比,在一年的中期随访中用于治疗冠状动脉ISR的多氯联苯与TLR的显着降低相关。和MACE在死亡率上没有任何差异,MI,或支架血栓形成。
    In-stent restenosis (ISR) accounts for 10% of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in the Unites States. Paclitaxel coated balloons (PCBs) have been evaluated as a therapy for coronary ISR in multiple randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Cochrane library, and ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception to April 1, 2024) for RCTs evaluating PCBs versus uncoated balloon angioplasty (BA) in patients with coronary ISR. The outcomes of interest were target lesion revascularization (TLR), major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), and stent thrombosis. We pooled the estimates using inverse variance random-effects model. The effect sizes were reported as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). A total of 6 RCTs with 1,343 patients were included. At a follow-up ranging from 6-12 months from randomization, use of PCBs was associated with a statistically significant decrease in TLR (RR 0.28; 95% CI 0.11 to 0.68), and MACE (RR 0.35; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.64) when compared with BA for coronary ISR. However, there was no significant difference in risk between PCBs and BA in terms of all-cause mortality (RR 0.56; 95% CI 0.14 to 2.31), cardiovascular mortality (RR 0.61; 95% CI 0.02 to 16.85), MI (RR 0.60; 95% CI 0.27 to 1.31), and stent thrombosis (RR 0.13; 95% CI 0.00 to 5.06). In conclusion, this meta-analysis suggests that PCBs compared with uncoated BA for treatment of coronary ISR at intermediate term follow-up of one-year was associated with significant decrease in TLR, and MACE without any difference in mortality, MI, or stent thrombosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:先天性主动脉瓣狭窄是儿童年龄组的常见病理,其临床范围在无症状和严重心力衰竭之间有所不同。在我们的研究中,我们计划在我们的临床中评估因严重主动脉瓣狭窄而接受球囊主动脉瓣成形术(BAV)的患者的长期结果.
    方法:对2002年1月至2022年1月在我们诊所因主动脉瓣狭窄而接受主动脉瓣球囊瓣膜成形术的0-18岁患者进行回顾性评估。
    结果:在48例因主动脉瓣狭窄而接受球囊瓣膜成形术的患者中,13人(27%)为女性,35人(73%)为男性。手术时的中位年龄为27.5个月(IQR:4-96),体重中位数为9.9公斤(IQR:5.40-29.50),身高中位数为79cm(IQR:54-133)。中位随访时间为93.5个月(IQR:38-132)。所有患者的血管造影评估显示,左心室压力中位数为160mmHg(IQR:140-200),左心室和主动脉之间的压力梯度中位数为60mmHg(IQR:42-80)。使用的中值球囊直径为10mm(IQR:8-12)。术后测量显示,左心室和主动脉之间的中位平均梯度为30mmHg(IQR:20-35)。45例(93.5%)患者手术成功。随访期间,11例患者需要手术干预。对五名患者进行了罗斯手术,五名患者的同种异体移植,对一名患者进行机械瓣膜植入。详细评估了需要手术干预的危险因素。在后续行动中,干预的危险因素被确定为主动脉瓣关闭不全.
    结论:主动脉瓣球囊瓣膜成形术是治疗严重主动脉瓣狭窄的一种安全、成功的方法。它应该是合适患者的首选治疗方案。
    OBJECTIVE: Congenital aortic stenosis is a common pathology in the childhood age group and its clinical spectrum varies between asymptomatic and severe heart failure. In our study, we planned to evaluate the long-term results of patients who underwent balloon aortic valvuloplasty (BAV) due to critical aortic valve stenosis in our clinic.
    METHODS:  Patients aged 0-18 years who underwent aortic balloon valvuloplasty due to aortic stenosis in our clinic between January 2002 and January 2022 were retrospectively evaluated.
    RESULTS: Among the 48 patients who underwent balloon valvuloplasty due to aortic stenosis, 13 (27%) were female, and 35 (73%) were male. The median age at the time of the procedure was 27.5 months (IQR: 4-96), the median weight was 9.9 kg (IQR: 5.40-29.50), and the median height was 79 cm (IQR: 54-133). The median follow-up duration was 93.5 months (IQR: 38-132). Angiographic assessments in all patients revealed a median left ventricular pressure of 160 mmHg (IQR: 140-200) and a median pressure gradient between the left ventricle and the aorta of 60 mmHg (IQR: 42-80). The median balloon diameter used was 10 mm (IQR: 8-12). Post-procedural measurements showed a median mean gradient of 30 mmHg (IQR: 20-35) between the left ventricle and the aorta. The procedure was successful in 45 (93.5%) patients. During follow-up, 11 patients required surgical intervention. Ross procedure was performed in five patients, homograft in five patients, and mechanical valve implantation in one patient. Risk factors for the need for surgical intervention were evaluated in detail. During the follow-up, the risk factor for intervention was determined to be aortic insufficiency.
    CONCLUSIONS: Aortic valve balloon valvuloplasty is a safe and successful treatment method for critical aortic stenosis. It should be the first choice of treatment option in suitable patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    动脉粥样硬化切除术在治疗股pop疾病中的作用正在迅速发展。然而,经皮球囊成形术(BA)(普通球囊和药物涂层BA)的辅助斑块切除术的临床疗效和安全性仍存在争议。我们试图进行一项荟萃分析,比较斑块切除术加球囊血管成形术(ABA)与单用BA治疗股pop疾病。
    我们搜索了PubMed,Cochrane临床试验中央注册中心,EMBASE,和ClinicalTrials.gov(从开始到2022年1月10日),用于比较ABA和BA治疗股pop疾病的研究。我们使用随机效应模型计算95%CI的风险比(RR)。靶病变血运重建(TLR),初级通畅,救助支架是主要结果。
    纳入了9项研究,共699名患者(4项随机研究和5项回顾性研究)。与单独的BA相比,ABA组显示出由非随机研究(RR0.59;95%CI,0.40-0.85;P=0.005)和救助支架(RR,0.32;95%CI,0.21-0.48;P<0.0001)。进行分析时,TLR没有显着差异,仅包括随机试验。两组之间的主要通畅性没有显着差异(RR,1.04;95%CI,0.95-1.14;P=.37)。
    来自随机试验的数据表明,与单独的BA相比,斑块切除和BA联合显示TLR或原发通畅性无差异.在观察性研究中,ABA组TLR和救助支架降低,但原发通畅性无差异。需要进一步的研究来研究与单用BA相比,动脉粥样硬化切除联合BA在股pop病变中的临床效果。
    UNASSIGNED: The role of atherectomy in treating femoropopliteal disease has been evolving rapidly. However, the clinical efficacy and safety of adjunctive atherectomy to percutaneous balloon angioplasty (BA) (plain balloon and drug-coated BA) remains controversial. We sought to perform a meta-analysis comparing atherectomy plus balloon angioplasty (ABA) versus BA alone in treating femoropopliteal disease.
    UNASSIGNED: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials, EMBASE, and ClinicalTrials.gov (from inception through January 10, 2022) for studies comparing ABA versus BA for femoropopliteal disease. We used a random-effects model to calculate risk ratio (RR) with 95% CIs. Target lesion revascularization (TLR), primary patency, and bailout stenting were the primary outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Nine studies with 699 patients were included (4 randomized and 5 retrospective studies). Compared to BA alone, the ABA group showed a significant decrease in TLR driven by nonrandomized studies (RR 0.59; 95% CI, 0.40-0.85; P = .005) and bailout stenting (RR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.21-0.48; P < .0001). There was no significant difference in TLR when the analysis was performed including only randomized trials. There was no significant difference in the primary patency between the 2 groups (RR, 1.04; 95% CI, 0.95-1.14; P = .37).
    UNASSIGNED: Data from randomized trials suggest that compared with BA alone, the combination of atherectomy and BA showed no difference in TLR or primary patency. In observational studies, TLR and bailout stenting were reduced in ABA group but there was no difference in primary patency. Further studies are needed to investigate the clinical outcomes of atherectomy combined with BA in femoropopliteal lesions compared with BA alone.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管手术修复是主动脉天然缩窄(CoA)的传统一线治疗方法,现在越来越多地进行球囊血管成形术(BA)和支架置入术.我们的目的是在最大的先天性导管插入术多中心注册表中确定经导管介入治疗天然缩窄的实践模式和急性结局。
    分析了IMPACT(改良儿科和成人先天性治疗)国家心血管数据注册的CoA干预措施。在未对主动脉峡部(天然CoA)进行干预的患者中,比较了手术选择和急性结局。手术成功定义为无主要不良事件(MAEs)且最终峰值梯度<20mmHg,最佳结果为无MAEs且最终梯度<10mmHg。
    在8年的研究期间,进行了5928次CoA程序,其中1187例在天然CoA患者中进行。在这个群体中,超过一半的>1岁儿童和>90%的>8岁儿童进行了支架置入术.在>90%的支架置入程序中,仅在69%的BA中获得了程序成功。调整年龄和基线特征后,支架植入与最佳梯度(<10mmHg)的可能性更高相关。MAE在1岁以下的儿童中最常见(14%),2%至2.5%的1至18岁人群和6.6%的成年人(P<.001),并且在BA后比支架置入后更有可能(赔率比,0.5;95%CI,0.28-0.9;未调整P=.02)。
    对年龄较大的儿童和成人安全地进行局部缩窄的导管干预,在程序上取得了高度的成功,特别是支架。
    UNASSIGNED: Although surgical repair was the traditional first-line treatment for native coarctation of the aorta (CoA), balloon angioplasty (BA) and stenting are now increasingly being performed. We aimed to determine the practice patterns and acute outcomes of transcatheter interventions for native coarctation in the largest multicenter registry for congenital catheterization.
    UNASSIGNED: CoA interventions from the IMPACT (IMproving Pediatric and Adult Congenital Treatment) National Cardiovascular Data Registry were analyzed. The procedure choice and acute outcomes were compared among patients with no prior interventions on the aortic isthmus (native CoA). Procedural success was defined as no major adverse events (MAEs) and a final peak gradient of <20 mm Hg and optimal outcome as no MAEs and a final gradient of <10 mm Hg.
    UNASSIGNED: Over the 8-year study period, 5928 CoA procedures were performed, of which 1187 were performed in patients with native CoA. In this group, stenting was performed in more then half of children aged >1 year and >90% of those aged >8 years. Procedural success was achieved in >90% of stenting procedures but in only 69% of BAs. Stent implantation was associated with a higher likelihood of optimal gradient (<10 mm Hg) after adjustment for age and baseline characteristics. MAEs were most common in children aged <1 year (14%), occurred in 2% to 2.5% of those aged 1 to 18 years and in 6.6% of adults (P < .001), and were more likely after BA than after stenting (odds ratio, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.28-0.9; unadjusted P = .02).
    UNASSIGNED: Catheter interventions for native coarctation are performed safely in older children and adults, with a high degree of immediate procedural success, particularly with stenting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这是一项前瞻性研究,旨在研究在下肢血管成形术中使用非顺应性球囊治疗慢性威胁肢体缺血(CLTI)的临床结果。
    这是一项在新加坡当地三级医院进行的前瞻性单中心队列研究。连续纳入使用非顺应性球囊导管进行下肢CLTI血管成形术的患者,如果他们年龄在40岁及以上,表现为CLTI卢瑟福4至6级,下肢血管有TASCC或D病变,长度至少为100mm。患者人口统计学,卢瑟福分级,病变特征,并发症,收集和分析随访数据。主要结局是30天无主要不良事件,12个月时无截肢生存期(AFS),12个月时无临床驱动的靶病变血运重建(cdTLR)。次要结果包括12个月时的临床成功和靶病变原发通畅(TLPP)。无截肢生存,从cdTLR自由,通过Kaplan-Meier分析计算TLPP。
    从2020年5月至2021年12月,招募了50名患者(50条肢体)。43(86%)患者患有糖尿病,而12例患者(24%)有终末期肾功能衰竭。治疗85个病灶,包括59(69.4%)膝下(BTK)病变。所有病变均为TASCC(n=45,52.9%)或TASCD(n=40,47.1%)病变。平均病变长度为231.4±116.2mm。技术成功率为96.5%。无患者失访。中位随访时间为282天(IQR:31-390天)。一名患者在第26天因急性心肌梗塞死亡。两名患者术后腹股沟血肿,两者都被保守地对待。AFS,从cdTLR自由,术后12个月TLPP为70.0%(95%置信区间[CI]:58.4%-83.9%),90.1%(95%CI:83.4%-97.4%),和61.1%(95%CI:50.7%-73.6%),分别。
    早期结果表明,使用高压,对于长期BTK疾病患病率高的极具挑战性的CLTI患者组,非顺应性球囊在下肢血管成形术中有效.可以实现良好的血管通畅性和肢体抢救率,并发症发生率低。我们等待更多的长期结果在血管通畅。
    结论:市场上有许多用于下肢血管成形术的设备。然而,他们中的许多人增加了财务成本,程序时间和程序难度。我们报告了我们的预期结果,仅使用高压,不合规的气球,在糖尿病和终末期肾功能衰竭患病率高的患者群体中,术后6个月和12个月的无截肢存活率分别为84.0%和70.0%。使用非顺应性球囊在技术上很容易,并且与标准POBA程序相比不会增加额外的步骤。从而限制成本。我们相信这篇文章可以推动临床医生考虑使用这些高压,病人护理中的不合规气球。
    UNASSIGNED: This is a prospective study to investigate the clinical outcomes of using noncompliant balloons in lower limb angioplasty for chronic limb threatening ischemia (CLTI).
    UNASSIGNED: This is a prospective single-center cohort study performed at a local tertiary hospital in Singapore. Consecutive patients who underwent lower limb angioplasty for CLTI using a noncompliant balloon catheter were enrolled if they were aged 40 years and above, presented with CLTI Rutherford grade 4 to 6, and had TASC C or D lesions in the lower limb vessels that were at least 100mm in length. Patient demographics, Rutherford grading, lesion characteristics, complications, and follow-up data were collected and analyzed. The primary outcomes were 30-day freedom from major adverse events, amputation-free survival (AFS) at 12 months, and freedom from clinically driven target lesion revascularization (cdTLR) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes included clinical success and target lesion primary patency (TLPP) at 12 months. Amputation-free survival, freedom from cdTLR, and TLPP were calculated by Kaplan-Meier analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: From May 2020 to December 2021, 50 patients (50 limbs) were enrolled. 43 (86%) patients had diabetes mellitus, while 12 patients (24%) had end-stage renal failure. 85 lesions were treated, including 59 (69.4%) below-the-knee (BTK) lesions. All the lesions were TASC C (n=45, 52.9%) or TASC D (n=40, 47.1%) lesions. Mean lesion length was 231.4±116.2mm. Technical success rate was 96.5%. No patients were lost to follow-up. Median follow-up duration was 282 days (IQR: 31-390 days). One patient died on day 26 due to an acute myocardial infarction. Two patients had groin hematomas postprocedure, both of which were treated conservatively. AFS, freedom from cdTLR, and TLPP at 12 months postprocedure was 70.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 58.4%-83.9%), 90.1% (95% CI: 83.4%-97.4%), and 61.1% (95% CI: 50.7%-73.6%), respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: Early results have shown that the use of a high-pressure, noncompliant balloon is effective in lower limb angioplasty for CLTI in a highly challenging group of patients with a high prevalence of long BTK disease. Good vessel patency and limb salvage rates can be achieved, with a low complication rate. We await more long-term outcomes on vessel patency.
    CONCLUSIONS: There are many devices in the market for use in lower limb angioplasty. However, many of them come with an increased financial cost, procedural time and procedural difficulty. We report our prospective results with the exclusive use of a high pressure, non-compliant balloon, in a challening group of patients with a high prevalence of diabetes and end stage renal failure, achieving amputation free surival at 6 and 12 months post-procedure of 84.0% and 70.0% respectively. The use of non-compliant balloon is technically easy and does not add additional steps compared to a standard POBA procedure, thus limiting costs. We believe this article can be a push factor for clinicians to consider the use of these high pressure, non-compliant balloons in their patient care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:比较粥样斑块切除术后一年的结果,血管内碎石术与普通球囊血管成形术前应用药物涂层球囊治疗股动脉粥样硬化性疾病。
    方法:MEDLINE,EMBASE,和Cochrane图书馆在2023年5月之前进行了随机对照试验的筛选。
    方法:这是一项系统综述和网络荟萃分析。纳入标准为跛行患者和危重肢体威胁性缺血患者,所有长度的病变特征,狭窄,钙化,和闭塞。主要结果是在一年时无靶病变再干预。次要结果是救助支架置入率,严重截肢,和一年的全因死亡率。用标准随机效应模型计算汇集点估计值。用混合治疗贝叶斯模型完成进一步的敏感性分析。通过修订的Cochrane偏差风险工具2(RoB2)评估偏差风险,并通过建议分级评估证据的确定性,评估,发展,和评估(等级)框架。
    结果:包含549例患者的四个RCT(两项研究评估了定向粥样斑块切除术,一个评估旋转旋磨,包括一项针对普通球囊血管成形术的评估血管内碎石术)。股pop病变的加权平均长度为103.4±6.67mm。混合治疗贝叶斯分析的结果与所有结局的汇总分析一致。靶病变血运重建的自由度没有显着差异(GRADE,高)(RoB2,低),大截肢术(年级,低),或死亡率(等级,中度)。与普通球囊血管成形术相比,血管内碎石术和粥样斑块切除术的支架置入率显著降低(RR0.25,95%CI0.07-0.89)(GRADE,中等)(RoB2,低)。
    结论:本综述发现,血管内碎石术或粥样斑块切除术在避免靶病变血运重建方面似乎没有显著的统计学优势,严重截肢,或者一年的死亡率。有证据表明,血管内碎石术和动脉粥样硬化切除术后,救助支架的植入显着减少。
    OBJECTIVE: To compare one year outcomes after atherectomy, intravascular lithotripsy vs. plain balloon angioplasty before application of drug coated balloons for treating femoropopliteal atherosclerotic disease.
    METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were screened until May 2023 for randomised controlled trials.
    METHODS: This was a systematic review and network meta-analysis. The inclusion criteria were patients with claudication and those with critical limb threatening ischaemia with lesion characteristics of all lengths, stenosis, calcification, and occlusions. The primary outcome was freedom from target lesion re-intervention at one year. Secondary outcomes were rate of bailout stenting, major amputation, and all cause mortality at one year. Pooled point estimates were calculated with a standard random effects model. Further sensitivity analyses were completed with a mixed treatment Bayesian model. Risk of bias was assessed by the Revised Cochrane Risk of Bias tool 2 (RoB2) and certainty of evidence assessed via the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.
    RESULTS: Four RCTs comprising 549 patients (two studies evaluating directional atherectomy, one evaluating rotational atherectomy, one evaluating intravascular lithotripsy against plain balloon angioplasty) were included. The weighted mean length of femoropopliteal lesions was 103.4 ± 6.67 mm. Results of the mixed treatment Bayesian analysis were consistent with pooled analysis for all outcomes. There were no significant differences in freedom from target lesion revascularisation (GRADE, high) (RoB2, low), major amputation (GRADE, low), or mortality (GRADE, moderate). Bailout stenting rates were significantly reduced with intravascular lithotripsy and atherectomy compared with plain balloon angioplasty (RR 0.25, 95% CI 0.07 - 0.89) (GRADE, moderate) (RoB2, low).
    CONCLUSIONS: This review found that intravascular lithotripsy or atherectomy did not appear to incur a statistically significant advantage in freedom from target lesion revascularisation, major amputation, or mortality rate at one year. There was moderate certainty of evidence that bailout stenting is significantly reduced after vessel preparation with intravascular lithotripsy and atherectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对于膝下(BTK)外周动脉疾病(PAD)的血管内治疗,比较非支架(球囊血管成形术或PTA和辅助治疗)伴或不伴同侧股pop动脉(FP)介入治疗的独立判定的真实世界结局很少.
    方法:纳入了2006-2021年间来自多中心XLPAD注册中心的1060名患者,这些患者采用了基于非支架的BTKPAD干预。
    方法:主要肢体不良事件(男性)的1年发生率,全因死亡的复合,任何截肢,或临床驱动的重复血运重建。
    结果:566例患者接受了BTK和494例BTK+FP干预;72%为男性,平均年龄68.4±10.9岁。糖尿病在仅BTK组中更为普遍(76.5%vs.69%,p=0.006)。平均卢瑟福等级4.2±1.18;BTK组中慢性威胁肢体缺血更为常见(55.3%vs.49%,p=0.040)。BTK+FP中至重度钙化较高(21.2%vs.27.1%,p=0.024),病变长度(110.6±77.3vs.135.4±86.3毫米;p<0.001)。几乎,81%的病变用PTA治疗。DCB(1.6%对14%,p<0.001)和粥样斑块切除术(38%vs.58.5%;p<0.001)在BTK+FP中的使用量更大。BTK+FP组的手术成功率更高(86%与91%,p=0.009),截肢是最常见的并发症,为3.3%≤30天。一年男性(21.2%vs.22.3%,p=0.675)和死亡率(4.6%与3.4%;p=0.3)在BTK和BTK+FP组中相似。
    结论:与单独的BTK干预相比,BTKPAD的非支架治疗伴随FP干预可导致较高的手术成功率和1年男性相似率。
    结论:绝大多数膝下(BTK)外周动脉疾病(PAD)的干预是通过球囊血管成形术进行的。在接受BTK干预的患者中存在流入股pop(FP)PAD会影响手术的结果。本报告探讨了对孤立的BTK和接受其他FPPAD干预的人进行球囊血管成形术治疗后1年的直接手术成功和主要不良肢体事件。
    For endovascular treatment of below-the-knee (BTK) peripheral artery disease (PAD), independently adjudicated real-world outcomes comparing non-stent-based balloon angioplasty (percutaneous transluminal angioplasty) and adjunctive treatments with or without a concomitant ipsilateral femoropopliteal (FP) artery intervention are scarce. A total of 1,060 patients from the multicenter XLPAD registry who underwent non-stent-based BTK PAD intervention between 2006 and 2021 were included. The primary outcome was the 1-year incidence of major adverse limb events (MALEs), a composite of all-cause death, any amputation, or clinically driven repeat revascularization. A total of 566 patients underwent BTK and 494 BTK + FP interventions; 72% were men, with a mean age of 68.4 ± 10.9 years. Diabetes mellitus was more prevalent in the BTK-only group (76.5% vs 69%, p = 0.006). Mean Rutherford class was 4.2 ± 1.18; chronic limb-threatening ischemia was more frequent in the BTK group (55.3% vs 49%, p = 0.040). Moderate to severe calcification was more frequent in the BTK + FP group (21.2% vs 27.1%, p = 0.024), as was lesion length (110.6 ± 77.3 vs 135.4 ± 86.3 mm, p <0.001). Nearly 81% of lesions were treated with percutaneous transluminal angioplasty. Drug-coated balloon (1.6% vs 14%, p <0.001) and atherectomy (38% vs 58.5%, p <0.001) use was more frequent in the BTK + FP group. The rate of procedural success was higher in the BTK + FP group (86% vs 91%, p = 0.009), with amputation being the most common complication at 3.3% within 30 days after the procedure. The rates of 1-year MALE (21.2% vs 22.3%, p = 0.675) and mortality (4.6% vs 3.4%, p = 0.3) were similar between the BTK and BTK + FP groups. Nonstent treatment for BTK PAD with concomitant FP intervention leads to high procedural success and similar rates of 1-year MALE compared with isolated BTK intervention. Condensed Abstract: The vast majority of below-the-knee (BTK) peripheral artery disease (PAD) interventions are performed with balloon angioplasty. Presence of inflow femoropopliteal PAD in patients who undergo BTK interventions can affect the outcome of the procedure. This report explores immediate procedural success and major adverse limb events at 1 year after balloon angioplasty treatment for isolated BTK PAD and in patients who underwent an additional femoropopliteal PAD intervention.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经皮腔内血管成形术(PTA)是治疗外周动脉疾病的主要方法。然而,一些患者在PTA后出现血流受限性夹层(FLD)。我们利用机器学习和SHapley加法扩张来识别和优化分类系统,以预测PTA后的FLD。
    这是一个多中心,回顾性,队列研究。该队列包括407名患者,他们在2021年1月至2023年6月期间在3个机构接受了股pop动脉(FP)治疗。评估术前计算机断层扫描血管造影图像以识别FP动脉分级,慢性完全闭塞(CTO),血管钙化(外周动脉钙评分系统[PACSS])。PTA之后,FLD通过血管造影鉴定。我们训练并验证了6个机器学习模型来估计PTA后的FLD发生,并选择了最佳模型。然后,每个CTO的Shapley值之和,FP,计算每位患者的PACSS以产生CTO-FP-PACSS值。CTO-FP-PACSS分类系统用于将患者分类为1至4类。进行单变量和多变量分析以验证CTO-FP-PACSS分类系统预测FLD的有效性。
    总的来说,对407例患者进行了分析,包括189名FLD患者和218名无FLD患者。性别差异(71%男性对54%男性,p<0.001),CTO(72%vs43%,p<0.001),FP(3.26±0.94vs2.66±1.06,p<0.001),和PACSS(2.39±1.40vs1.74±1.35,p<0.001)在有和无FLD的患者之间观察到,分别。随机森林模型表现出最佳性能(曲线下的验证集面积:0.82)。Shapley添加剂扩张透露CTO,PACSS,和FP是3个最具影响力的FLD预测因子,单变量和多变量分析证实CTO-FP-PACSS分类为独立的FLD预测因子(多变量风险比4.13;p<0.001)。
    CTO-FP-PACSS分类系统准确预测了PTA后的FLD。这个用户友好的系统可以指导手术决策,帮助选择PTA和其他设备,以减少FP动脉治疗中的FLD。
    我们利用机器学习技术与SHapley附加计划相结合,开发了一种临床分类系统,该系统可预测普通旧球囊血管成形术后的流量限制夹层(FLD)的可能性。该分类系统根据三个因素将病变分为1-4类:慢性完全闭塞,股pop骨分级,和外周动脉钙评分。每个班级表现出不同的发生FLD的概率。这种分类系统可能对外科医生的临床实践很有价值,以及其他研究人员的灵感来源。
    UNASSIGNED: Percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) is the primary method for treatment in peripheral arterial disease. However, some patients experience flow-limiting dissection (FLD) after PTA. We utilized machine learning and SHapley Additive exPlanations to identify and optimize a classification system to predict FLD after PTA.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a multi-center, retrospective, cohort study. The cohort comprised 407 patients who underwent treatment of the femoropopliteal (FP) arteries in 3 institutions between January 2021 and June 2023. Preoperative computed tomography angiography images were evaluated to identify FP artery grading, chronic total occlusion (CTO), and vessel calcification (peripheral artery calcium scoring system [PACSS]). After PTA, FLD was identified by angiography. We trained and validated 6 machine-learning models to estimate FLD occurrence after PTA, and the best model was selected. Then, the sum of the Shapley values for each of CTO, FP, and PACSS was calculated for each patient to produce the CTO-FP-PACSS value. The CTO-FP-PACSS classification system was used to classify the patients into classes 1 to 4. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to validate the effectiveness of the CTO-FP-PACSS classification system for predicting FLD.
    UNASSIGNED: Overall, 407 patients were analyzed, comprising 189 patients with FLD and 218 patients without FLD. Differences in sex (71% males vs 54% males, p<0.001), CTO (72% vs 43%, p<0.001), FP (3.26±0.94 vs 2.66±1.06, p<0.001), and PACSS (2.39±1.40 vs 1.74±1.35, p<0.001) were observed between patients with and without FLD, respectively. The random forest model demonstrated the best performance (validation set area under the curve: 0.82). SHapley Additive exPlanations revealed CTO, PACSS, and FP as the 3 most influential FLD predictors, and the univariate and multivariate analyses confirmed CTO-FP-PACSS classification as an independent FLD predictor (multivariate hazard ratio 4.13; p<0.001).
    UNASSIGNED: The CTO-FP-PACSS classification system accurately predicted FLD after PTA. This user-friendly system may guide surgical decision-making, helping choose between PTA and additional devices to reduce FLD in FP artery treatment.
    UNASSIGNED: We utilised machine-learning techniques in conjunction with SHapley Additive exPlanations to develop a clinical classification system that predicts the probability of flow-limiting dissection (FLD) after plain old balloon angioplasty. This classification system categorises lesions into Classes 1-4 based on three factors: chronic total occlusion, femoropopliteal grading, and peripheral artery calcium scoring. Each class demonstrated a different probability of developing FLD. This classification system may be valuable for surgeons in their clinical practice, as well as serving as a source of inspiration for other researchers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:糖尿病足是导致残疾和死亡的常见原因,合并症的足部感染通常会导致住院时间延长,医疗费用高,截肢率显着提高。大多数糖尿病足外伤并发下肢动脉病变,成为糖尿病足患者大截肢的独立危险因素。
    目的:建立血管内血运重建(ER)联合负压辅助封堵(VAC)治疗糖尿病足的疗效和安全性。
    方法:收集2018年4月至2022年4月苏州大学附属第二医院收治的40例糖尿病足患者的临床资料。糖尿病足病变根据瓦格纳分类进行分级,使用踝臂指数测试和下肢动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影评估下肢血流。连续皮下胰岛素输注泵用于实现血糖控制。经皮经腔球囊血管成形术(BA)或支架置入可促进下肢血运重建。通过蚕食清创术清洁伤口。VAC诱导伤口肉芽组织生长,创面修复采用植皮或皮瓣移植。
    结果:35例下肢血运重建,34例成功,血运重建成功率为97%。其中,6例股浅动脉BA后支架置入术,其中1例接受了动脉支架植入术。25例患者行膝下动脉血运重建,重建了39条动脉,其中7个用药物包衣的BA处理,其余32个用普通的旧BA处理。在32个伤口中进行VAC。行植皮24例,皮瓣移植2例。两名患者接受了大截肢手术,而17人有轻微截肢,占成功率的95%。
    结论:ER联合VAC治疗糖尿病足是一种安全有效的治疗方法,可显著提高保肢率。在ER后使用VAC简化并促进伤口修复。
    BACKGROUND: The diabetic foot is a common cause of disability and death, and comorbid foot infections usually lead to prolonged hospitalization, high healthcare costs, and a significant increase in amputation rates. And most diabetic foot trauma is complicated by lower extremity arteriopathy, which becomes an independent risk factor for major amputation in diabetic foot patients.
    OBJECTIVE: To establish the efficacy and safety of endovascular revascularization (ER) combined with vacuum-assisted closure (VAC) for the treatment of diabetic foot.
    METHODS: Clinical data were collected from 40 patients with diabetic foot admitted to the Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University from April 2018 to April 2022. Diabetic foot lesions were graded according to Wagner\'s classification, and blood flow to the lower extremity was evaluated using the ankle-brachial index test and computerized tomography angiography of the lower extremity arteries. Continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion pumps were used to achieve glycemic control. Lower limb revascularization was facilitated by percutaneous tran-sluminal balloon angioplasty (BA) or stenting. Wounds were cleaned by nibbling debridement. Wound granulation tissue growth was induced by VAC, and wound repair was performed by skin grafting or skin flap transplantation.
    RESULTS: Of the 35 cases treated with lower limb revascularization, 34 were successful with a revascularization success rate of 97%. Of these, 6 cases underwent stenting after BA of the superficial femoral artery, and 1 received popliteal artery stent implantation. In the 25 cases treated with infrapopliteal artery revascularization, 39 arteries were reconstructed, 7 of which were treated by drug-coated BA and the remaining 32 with plain old BA. VAC was performed in 32 wounds. Twenty-four cases of skin grafting and 2 cases of skin flap transplantation were performed. Two patients underwent major amputations, whereas 17 had minor amputations, accounting for a success limb salvage rate of 95%.
    CONCLUSIONS: ER in combination with VAC is a safe and effective treatment for diabetic foot that can significantly improve limb salvage rates. The use of VAC after ER simplifies and facilitates wound repair.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号