Reciprocal inhibition and coactivation are strategies of the central nervous system used to perform various daily tasks. In automatic postural responses (APR), coactivation is widely investigated in the ankle joint muscles, however reciprocal inhibition, although clear in manipulative motor actions, has not been investigated in the context of APRs. The aim was to identify whether reciprocal inhibition can be observed as a strategy in the recruitment of gastrocnemius Medialis (GM), Soleus (So) and Tibialis Anterior (TA) muscles in low- and high-velocity forward and backward perturbations. We applied two balance perturbations with a low and a high velocity of displacement of the movable platform in forward and backward conditions and we evaluated the magnitude and latency time of TA, GM and So activation latency, measured by electromyography (EMG). In forward perturbations, coactivation of the three muscles was observed, with greater activation amplitude of the GM and lesser amplitude of the So and TA muscles. For backward, the pattern of response observed was activation of the TA muscle, a decrease in the EMG signal, which characterizes reciprocal inhibition of the GM muscle and maintenance of the basal state of the So muscle. This result indicates that backward perturbations are more challenging.

UNASSIGNED: Differences in motor control between the lower limbs may influence the risk of sports injury and recovery from rehabilitation. In this study, differences in the visual feedback ability of the left and right lower limbs were assessed using visual target tracking tasks.
UNASSIGNED: Thirty-four healthy young subjects (aged 20.4 ± 1.2 years) were asked to move their bodies back and forth while tracking a visual target displayed on a monitor in front of them for 30 s. The two target motions were sinusoidal (i.e., predictable patterns) and more complex (random) patterns. To assess the ability of the lower limbs to follow visual target tracking, antero-posterior CoP (right limb, CoPap-r; left limb, CoPap-l) and medio-lateral CoP (right limb, CoPml-r; left limb, CoPml-l) data were measured using a stabilometer. Tracking ability by visual feedback ability was calculated as the difference in displacement between the target signal and the trajectories of the right and left pressure centers as trapezoidal areas, and a smaller sum of area (SoA) over the entire measurement time was defined as a greater tracking ability.
UNASSIGNED: Regarding the SoA in the anterior-posterior CoP, the mean SoA in the sinusoidal and random tasks was significantly lower in the CoP-r data than in the CoP-l data, indicating that the right lower limb had a more remarkable ability to follow visual target tracking. Regarding the SoA in the medial-lateral direction (CoP), the mean SoA in the sinusoidal and random tasks did not significantly differ between the two legs.
UNASSIGNED: The right lower limb may have a tracking function activated by the target signal when responding to visual stimuli. Identifying the motor strategies of each lower limb in response to visual stimuli will not only help identify potential differences between each lower limb but also suggest the possibility of enhancing the role of each lower limb in balance control.

BACKGROUND: Clinical dynamic posturography concentrates on the pitch and roll but not on the yaw plane instability measures. This emphasis may not represent the axis instability observed in clinical stance and gait tasks for patients with balance deficits in comparison to healthy control (HC) subjects, nor the expected instability based on correlations with vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) deficits. To examine the axis stability changes with vestibular loss, we measured trunk sway in all three directions (pitch, roll, and yaw) during the stance and gait tasks of patients with acute unilateral vestibular neuritis (aUVN) and compared the results with those of HC. Concurrent changes in VORs were also examined and correlated with trunk balance deficits.
METHODS: The results of 11 patients (mean age of 61 years) recorded within 6 days of aUVN onset were compared within those of 8 age-matched healthy controls (HCs). All subjects performed a two-legged stance task-standing with eyes closed on foam (s2ecf), a semi-gait task-walking eight tandem steps (tan8), and four gait tasks-walking 3 m with head rotating laterally, pitching, or eyes closed (w3hr, w3hp, w3ec), and walking over four barriers 24 cm high, spaced 1 m apart (barr). The tasks\' peak-to-peak yaw, pitch and roll angles, and angular velocities were measured with a gyroscope system (SwayStarTM) mounted at L1-3 and combined into three, axis-specific, balance control indexes (BCI), using angles (a) for the tandem gait and barriers task, and angular velocities (v) for all other tasks, as follows: axis BCI = (2 × 2ecf)v + 1.5 × (w3hr + w3hp + w3ec)v + (tan8 + 12 × barr)a.
RESULTS: Yaw and pitch BCIs were significantly (p ≤ 0.004) greater (88 and 30%, respectively) than roll BCIs for aUVN patients. For HCs, only yaw but not pitch BCIs were greater (p = 0.002) than those of roll (72%). The order of BCI aUVN vs. HC differences was pitch, yaw, and roll at 55, 44, and 31%, respectively (p ≤ 0.002). This difference with respect to roll corresponded to the known greater yaw plane than roll plane asymmetry (40 vs. 22%) following aUVN based on VOR responses. However, the lower pitch plane asymmetry (3.5%) in VOR responses did not correspond with the pitch plane instability observed in the balance control tests. The increases in pitch plane instability in UVL subjects were, however, highly correlated with those of roll and yaw.
CONCLUSIONS: These results indicate that greater yaw than pitch and roll trunk motion during clinical balance tasks is common for aUVN patients and HCs. However, aUVN leads to a larger increase in pitch than yaw plane instability and a smaller increase in roll plane instability. This difference with respect to roll corresponds to the known greater yaw plane than roll plane asymmetry (40 vs. 22%) following aUVN observed in VOR responses. However, the lower pitch plane asymmetry (3.5%) in VOR responses does not correspond with the enhanced movements in the pitch plane, observed in balance control tasks. Whether asymmetries in vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (Vemps) are better correlated with the deficits in pitch plane balance control remains to be investigated. The current results provide a strong rationale for the clinical testing of directional specific balance responses, especially yaw and pitch, and the linking of balance results for yaw and roll to VOR asymmetries.

This study examines the impact of Human-Drone Interaction (HDI) modalities on construction workers\' safety and balance control within virtual environments. Utilising virtual reality (VR) simulations, the study explored how gesture and speech-based communications influence workers\' physical postures and balance, contrasting these modalities with a non-interactive control group. One hundred participants were recruited, and their movements and balance control were tracked using motion sensors while they interacted with virtual drones through either gesture, speech, or without communication. Results showed that interactive modalities significantly improved balance control and reduced the risk of falls, suggesting that advanced HDI can enhance safety on construction sites. However, speech-based interaction increased cognitive workload, highlighting a trade-off between physical safety and mental strain. These findings underscore the potential of integrating intuitive communication methods into construction operations, although further research is needed to optimise these interactions for long-term use and in diverse noise environments.
This study examines the impact of Human-Drone Interaction (HDI) modalities on construction workers’ safety and balance control within virtual environments with a human subject experiment. Results showed that interactive modalities significantly improved balance control and reduced the risk of falls.

BACKGROUND: There has been growing interest in using unstable devices in training protocols. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of two multimodal exercise interventions (i.e., on stable and unstable surfaces) on dynamic balance control and lower limb strength in older adults.
METHODS: Sixty-two older adults were randomly assigned to two intervention groups (N = 20, stable group; N = 19, unstable group), and to a control group (N = 18). In this single-blinded randomized controlled study, the two intervention groups underwent a 12-week training program twice a week for 45 min, consisting of strength and balance exercises. The stable (ST) group performed the training program over stable surfaces, while the unstable (UNST) group over unstable surfaces. Dynamic balance was assessed by computing the center of pressure (CoP) trajectory while a driven movable platform induced an unexpected perturbation of the base of support. Specifically, we considered the following CoP-related parameters within a 2.5-s temporal window from the beginning of the perturbation: displacement (Area95), mean velocity (Unit Path), anterior-posterior first peak (FP), post perturbation variability (PPV), and maximal oscillations (ΔCoPMax). The dominant quadriceps strength was measured through an isometric maximal voluntary contraction on an instrumented chair.
RESULTS: Four out of five CoP-related parameters (i.e., Area95, Unit Path, ΔCoPMax, and PPV) significantly improved in the UNST group from a minimum of 14.28% (d = 0.44) to a maximum of 52.82% (d = 0.58). The ST group significantly improved only in two (i.e., ΔCoPMax, and PPV) out of five CoP-related parameters with an enhancement of 12.48% (d = 0.68) and 19.10% (d = 1.06). Both intervention groups increased the maximal isometric quadriceps strength (UNST:17.27%, d = 0.69; ST:22.29%, d = 0.98). The control group did not show changes in any of the parameters considered.
CONCLUSIONS: Stable surfaces promoted faster increments of muscular strength. Unstable surfaces were more effective in enhancing dynamic balance efficiency. These findings suggested the employment of multimodal training on unstable rather than stable surfaces to potentially lower the incidence of falls in older adults.
BACKGROUND: NCT05769361, retrospectively registered 13 March 2023, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT05769361?lat=45.3661864&lng=11.8209139&locStr=Padova,%20Italy&distance=50&page=11&rank=107 .

Virtual error amplification (VEA) in visual feedback enhances attentive control over postural stability, although the neural mechanisms are still debated. This study investigated the distinct cortical control of unsteady stance in older adults using VEA through cross-frequency modulation of postural fluctuations and scalp EEG. Thirty-seven community-dwelling older adults (68.1 ± 3.6 years) maintained an upright stance on a stabilometer while receiving either VEA or real error feedback. Along with postural fluctuation dynamics, phase-amplitude coupling (PAC) and amplitude-amplitude coupling (AAC) were analyzed for postural fluctuations under 2 Hz and EEG sub-bands (theta, alpha, and beta). The results revealed a higher mean frequency of the postural fluctuation phase (p = .005) and a greater root mean square of the postural fluctuation amplitude (p = .003) with VEA compared to the control condition. VEA also reduced PAC between the postural fluctuation phase and beta-band EEG in the left frontal (p = .009), sensorimotor (p = .002), and occipital (p = .018) areas. Conversely, VEA increased the AAC of posture fluctuation amplitude and beta-band EEG in FP2 (p = .027). Neither theta nor alpha band PAC or AAC were affected by VEA. VEA optimizes postural strategies in older adults during stabilometer stance by enhancing visuospatial attentive control of postural responses and facilitating the transition of motor states against postural perturbations through a disinhibitory process. Incorporating VEA into virtual reality technology is advocated as a valuable strategy for optimizing therapeutic interventions in postural therapy, particularly to mitigate the risk of falls among older adults.

BACKGROUND: Older adults have difficulty maintaining side-to-side balance while navigating daily environments. Losing balance in such circumstances can lead to falls. We need to better understand how older adults adapt lateral balance to navigate environment-imposed task constraints.
OBJECTIVE: How do older adults adjust mediolateral balance while walking along continually-narrowing paths, and what are the stability implications of these adjustments?
METHODS: Eighteen older (71.6±6.0 years) and twenty younger (21.7±2.6 years) healthy adults traversed 25 m-long paths that gradually narrowed from 45 cm to 5 cm. Participants switched onto an adjacent path when they chose. We quantified participants\' lateral center-of-mass dynamics and lateral Margins of Stability (MoSL) as paths narrowed. We quantified lateral Probability of Instability (PoIL) as the probability that participants would take a laterally unstable (MoSL<0) step as they walked. We also extracted these outcomes where participants switched paths.
RESULTS: As paths narrowed, all participants exhibited progressively smaller average MoSL and increasingly larger PoIL. However, their MoSL variability was largest at both the narrowest and widest path sections. Older adults exhibited consistently both larger average and more variable MoSL across path widths. Taken into account together, these resulted in either comparable or somewhat larger PoIL as paths narrowed. Older adults left the narrowing paths sooner, on average, than younger. As they did so, older adults exhibited significantly larger average and more variable MoSL, but somewhat smaller PoIL than younger.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results directly challenge the predominant interpretation that larger average MoSL indicate \"greater stability\", which we argue is inconsistent with the principles underlying its derivation. In contrast, analyzing step-to-step gait dynamics, together with estimating PoIL allows one to properly quantify instability risk. Furthermore, the adaptive strategies uncovered using these methods suggest potential targets for future interventions to reduce falls in older adults.

Visual information is essential to navigate the environment and maintain postural stability during gait. Visual field rotations alter the perceived heading direction, resulting in gait trajectory deviations, known as visual coupling. It is unclear how center of mass (CoM) control relative to a continuously changing base of support (BoS) is adapted to facilitate visual coupling. This study aimed to characterize mediolateral (ML) balance control during visual coupling in steady-state gait. Sixteen healthy participants walked on an instrumented treadmill, naive to sinusoidal low-frequency (0.1 Hz) rotations of the virtual environment around the vertical axis. Rotations were continuous with 1) high or 2) low amplitude or were 3) periodic with 10-s intervals. Visual coupling was characterized with cross-correlations between CoM trajectory and visual rotations. Balance control was characterized with the ML margin of stability (MoSML) and by quantifying foot placement control as the relation between CoM dynamics and lateral foot placement. Visual coupling was strong on a group level (continuous low: 0.88, continuous high: 0.91, periodic: 0.95) and moderate to strong on an individual level. Higher rotation amplitudes induced stronger gait trajectory deviations. The MoSML decreased toward the deviation direction and increased at the opposite side. Foot placement control was similar compared with regular gait. Furthermore, pelvis and foot reorientation toward the rotation direction was observed. We concluded that visual coupling was facilitated by reorientating the body and shifting the extrapolated CoMML closer to the lateral BoS boundary toward the adjusted heading direction while preserving CoM excursion and foot placement control.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Healthy, naive participants were unaware of subtle, low-frequency rotations of the visual field but still coupled their gait trajectory to a rotating virtual environment. In response, participants decreased their margin of stability toward the new heading direction, without changing the center of mass excursion magnitude and foot placement strategy.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 25% of pregnant people fall, yet the underlying mechanisms of this increased fall-risk remain unclear. Prior studies examining pregnancy and balance have utilized center of pressure analyses and reported mixed results. The purpose of this study was to examine sensory and segmental contributions to postural control throughout pregnancy using accelerometer-based measures of sway.
METHODS: Thirty pregnant people (first trimester: n = 10, second trimester: n = 10, third trimester: n = 10) and 10 healthy, nonpregnant control people stood quietly for one minute in four conditions: eyes open on a firm surface, eyes closed on a firm surface, eyes open on a foam pad, and eyes closed on foam. Postural sway was quantified using the root mean square accelerations in the anterior-posterior and medial-lateral directions from an inertial sensor at the lumbar region. Sensory sway ratios, segmental coherence and co-phase, were calculated to assess sensory contributions and segmental control, respectively.
RESULTS: Pregnant people did not display greater sway compared to healthy, nonpregnant controls. There were no group differences in vestibular, visual, or somatosensory sway ratios, and no significant differences in balance control strategies between pregnant and nonpregnant participants across sensory conditions.
CONCLUSIONS: The small effects observed here contrast prior studies and suggest larger, definitive studies are needed to assess the effect of pregnancy on postural control. This study serves as a preliminary exploration of pregnant sensory and segmental postural control and highlights the need for future to hone the role of balance in fall risk during pregnancy.

BACKGROUND: Stepping thresholds, i.e. the maximum perturbation one can withstand without taking a step, predict falls in older people. This ability requires fast central processing of sensory information followed by rapid execution of adequate motor responses, both of which are affected by age. However, there is limited evidence on their combined effect on stepping thresholds.
OBJECTIVE: Are cognitive and motor speeds important for stepping thresholds and do they interact, allowing for compensation?
METHODS: Two-hundred forty-two people (mean age: 80 years, standard deviation 4; 110 women) underwent a series of waist-pulls of increasing magnitude to assess stepping thresholds in anterior, posterior and mediolateral directions. Cognitive function was assessed as simple hand reaction time and trail making test performance, and muscle function was assessed as isometric peak and rate of torque development of dominant leg muscles. Principal component analysis reduced these variables to four factors: peak muscle strength, muscle torque development speed (motor speed), executive function and central processing speed (cognitive speed). These factors were used in univariable and multivariable regression models to determine their association with stepping thresholds.
RESULTS: Faster central processing speed (beta:2.69; 95 %CI:1.49-3.88) and faster muscle torque development speed (beta:2.60, 95 %CI:0.63-4.57) were associated with higher stepping thresholds. These associations remained in a multivariable model. No interaction was found between cognitive and motor speed on stepping thresholds (p = 0.602).
CONCLUSIONS: Central processing speed and muscle torque development speed affect stepping thresholds independently from each other and may both be important age-related motor impairment targets for preventing falls in older people.