BACKGROUND: Microbial screening of platelet concentrates (PC) with automated culture methods is widely implemented to reduce septic transfusion reactions. Herein, detection of bacterial contamination in PC was compared between units prepared in plasma and a mix of plasma and platelet additive solution (PAS) and between the BACT/ALERT 3D and next generation BACT/ALERT VIRTUO systems.
METHODS: Double apheresis units were split into single units, diluted in either PAS (PAS-PC) or plasma (plasma-PC), and tested for in vitro quality and sterility prior to spiking with ~30 CFU/unit of Staphylococcus epidermidis, Staphylococcus aureus, Serratia marcescens, and Klebsiella pneumoniae or ~10 CFU/mL of Cutibacterium acnes. Spiked PC were sampled for BACT/ALERT testing (36 and 48 h post-spiking) and colony counts (24, 36, and 48 h post-spiking). Times to detection (TtoD) and bacterial loads were compared between PC products and BACT/ALERT systems (N = 3).
RESULTS: Bacterial growth was similar in plasma-PC and PAS-PC. No significant differences in TtoD were observed between plasma-PC and PAS-PC at the 36-h sampling time except for S. epidermidis which grew faster in plasma-PC and C. acnes which was detected earlier in PAS-PC (p < .05). Detection of facultative bacteria was 1.3-2.2 h sooner in VIRTUO compared with 3D (p < .05) while TtoD for C. acnes was not significantly different between the two systems.
CONCLUSIONS: Comparable bacterial detection was observed in plasma-PC and PAS-PC with PC sampling performed at 36-h post blood collection. PC sampling at ≤36 h could result in faster detection of facultative pathogenic organisms with the VIRTUO system and improved PC safety.

Neonatal sepsis is a major determinant of neonatal mortality. There is a scarcity of evidence-based guidelines for the duration of antibiotics in culture-positive sepsis.
The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 10- and 14-day antibiotic therapies in the management of culture-positive neonatal sepsis.
This randomized controlled trial was conducted in the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary care center among the neonates suffering from culture-positive sepsis (with signs of clinical remission on day 9 of antibiotic) between January 2023 and May 2023. Newborns with major congenital anomaly, deep-seated infections, multi-organ dysfunction, associated fungal infections/infection by multiple organisms and severe birth asphyxia were excluded. Two hundred and thirty-four newborns were randomized into two groups-study (received 10 days of antibiotics) and control (received 14 days of antibiotics). Treatment failure, hospital stay and adverse effects were compared between the two groups. p < 0.05 was taken as the limit of statistical significance.
Median [interquartile range (IQR)] birth weight and gestational age of the study population (53.8% boys) were 2.424 kg (IQR: 2.183-2.695) and 37.3 weeks (IQR: 35.5-38.1), respectively. Acinetobacter was the most commonly isolated species (56, 23.9%). The baseline characteristics of both groups were almost similar. Treatment failure was similar in the study and control groups (3.8% vs. 1.7%, p = 0.40), with a shorter hospital stay [median (IQR): 14 (13-16) vs. 18 (17-19) days, p < 0.001].
Ten-day antibiotic therapy was comparable with 14-day antibiotic therapy in efficacy, with a shorter duration of hospital stay and without any significant increase in adverse effects.
Neonatal sepsis is a major cause of neonatal mortality in developing countries like India. Textbooks recommend 14-day antibiotic treatment for culture-positive neonatal sepsis. However, these guidelines are not strictly evidence based. Prolonged antibiotic treatment might be associated with drug resistance, secondary infections and organ damage. A shorter course of antibiotic, if found effective, would be beneficial especially in the resource-constrained settings like India. Hence, this study was undertaken to compare a shorter duration antibiotic treatment (10 days) with the conventional 14-day antibiotic therapy. Two hundred and thirty-four newborns with culture-positive sepsis were randomized into the study group (received 10 days of antibiotics) and the control group (received 14 days of antibiotics). Socio-demographic characters, clinical and laboratory features and bacteriological profile of both the groups were recorded. Both the groups were comparable in baseline features. Two-thirds of them were suffering from Gram-negative sepsis, Acinetobacter being the most commonly isolated organism. Incidence of treatment failure was similar in the study and control groups. Duration of hospital stay was significantly lower in the study group than in the control group. This observation was true irrespective of gestational age and type of organisms. There were no significant differences in adverse effects between the groups. However, there are certain limitations in the study, and hence, multi-centric research should be undertaken before making generalized recommendations of practising short duration of antibiotics.

Theoretically, Aspergillus spp. grow in culture media, but frequently, blood cultures of patients with invasive Aspergillosis are negative, even if until now, the reasons are not clear. This aspect underlines the lack of a good strategy for the cultivation and isolation of Aspergillus spp. In order to develop a complete analytical method to detect Aspergillus in clinical and pharmaceutical samples, we investigated the growth performance of two blood culture systems versus the pharmacopeia standard method. At <72 h, all test systems showed comparable sensitivity, about 1−2 conidia. However, the subculture analysis showed a suboptimal recovery for the methods, despite the positive growth and the visualization of the “Aspergillus balls” in the culture media. To investigate this issue, we studied three different subculture approaches: (i) the use of a sterile subculture unit, (ii) the use of a sterile subculture unit and the collection of a larger aliquot (100 µL), following vigorous agitation of the vials, and (iii) to decapsulate the bottle, withdrawing and centrifuging the sample, and aliquot the pellet onto SDA plates. Our results showed that only the third procedure recovered Aspergillus from all positive culture bottles. This work confirmed that our strategy is a valid and faster method to culture and isolate Aspergillus spp. from blood culture bottles.

The utility of anaerobic blood culture bottles remains controversial, especially for specimens from children. Data are limited on the inclusion of an anaerobic bottle as part of a blood culture \"set\" when using contemporary blood culture instruments and media. Here, we evaluated the clinical utility of anaerobic blood culture bottles (FN Plus) and aerobic bottles (FA Plus) for the BacT/Alert Virtuo blood culture system (bioMérieux). A total of 158,710 bottles collected between November 2018 and October 2019 were evaluated. There were 6,652 positive anaerobic bottles, of which 384 (5.8%) contained 403 obligate anaerobes. In patients <19 years old, there were 389 positive anaerobic bottles, with 15 (1.8%) containing 16 obligate anaerobes. If not for anaerobic bottles, all but 8 obligate anaerobes would have gone undetected. Furthermore, anaerobic bottles were advantageous for some facultative anaerobes. Staphylococcus aureus from anaerobic bottles demonstrated statistically significant increased recovery (1,992 anaerobic versus 1,901 aerobic bottles, P = 0.009) and faster mean time to positivity (1,138 versus 1,174 min, P = 0.027). Only 25 microorganisms had statistically significant improved recovery and/or faster time to positivity from aerobic versus anaerobic bottles, suggesting anaerobic bottles offer comparable growth for most species. Finally, if only an aerobic bottle had been collected, 2,027 fewer positive cultures would have been detected and 7,452 fewer isolates would have been reported, including cultures with S. aureus (413 isolates, 10.6% less), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (9 isolates, 3.1% less) and Escherichia coli (193 isolates, 14.0% less). Taken together, these findings support the practice of routinely including an anaerobic bottle for blood culture collection.

The BacT/Alert system has been used for detecting the presence of bacteria in various clinical settings as well as in blood services, but it is associated with a relatively high incidence of false-positive results. We analyzed the results of our quality control sterility testing of blood products by BacT/Alert 3D to understand the mechanism of false-positive results. Anaerobic and aerobic bottles were inoculated with 10 mL of samples and cultured in BacT/Alert 3D for 10 days. Positive-reaction cases were classified as true positive if any bacterium was identified or false positive if the identification test had a negative result. The detection algorithm and the bottle graph pattern of the positive reaction cases were investigated. Among the 43,374 samples, 25 true positives (0.06%) and 29 false positives (0.07%) were observed. Although the detection algorithm of all true positives and 25 of 29 false positives was accelerating production of CO2, a steep rise in the bottle graph was observed only in the true positives, and it was not observed in either of the false positives. Four of 29 false positives were dependent on high baseline scatter reflections. Furthermore, evaluating the bottle graph pattern of Streptococcus pneumoniae, a bacterium known to autolyze, we confirmed that no viable bacterium was detected even if a steep rise was observed. In conclusion, the bottle graph pattern of positive reactions allows the differentiation between true positives and false positives. In case of a steep rise without bacterium detection, the bacterium might have autolyzed. Moreover, positive reactions with high baseline scatter reflections, despite immediate loading of bottles after sampling, are potentially false positive. IMPORTANCE In clinical settings, false-positive results are treated as positive until bacterial identification. It may result in the discarding of blood products in blood centers or affect clinical decisions in hospitals or testing facilities. Moreover, the management of these samples is usually time- and labor-consuming. The results of our study may help clinicians and laboratory staff in making a more precise evaluation of positive reactions in BacT/Alert.

Although Candida spp are aerobic microorganisms, some Candida strains, mainly Candida glabrata, can be recovered from anaerobic blood culture vials. We assessed the contribution of the anaerobic vials for the diagnosis of candidemia, especially for C. glabrata. We conducted a multicenter retrospective study including eight university or regional hospitals. A single episode of monomicrobial candidemia per patient was included from September 1st, 2016, to August 31st, 2019. The characteristics of all aerobic and anaerobic blood culture vials sampled within 2 h before and after the first positive blood culture vials were recorded (type of vials, result, and for positive vials time-to-positivity and Candida species). Overall, 509 episodes of candidemia were included. The main species were C. albicans (55.6%) followed by C. glabrata (17.1%), C. parapsilosis (4.9%), and C. tropicalis (4.5%). An anaerobic vial was positive in 76 (14.9%) of all episodes of which 56 (73.8%) were due to C. glabrata. The number of C. glabrata infections only positive in anaerobic vials was 1 (2.6%), 1 (11.1%), and 15 (37.5%) with the BACT/ALERT 3D the BACT/ALERT VIRTUO and the BACTEC FX instrument, respectively (P < 0.01). The initial positivity of an anaerobic vial was highly predictive of the isolation of C. glabrata with the BACTEC FX (sensitivity of 96.8%). C. glabrata time-to-positivity was shorter in anaerobic vial than aerobic vial with all instruments. Anaerobic blood culture vials improve the recovery of Candida spp mainly C. glabrata. This study could be completed by further analyses including mycological and pediatric vials.
BACKGROUND: Although Candida spp are aerobic microorganisms, C. glabrata is able to grow in anaerobic conditions. In blood culture, the time-to-positivity of C. glabrata is shorter in anaerobic than aerobic vials. Only the anaerobic vial was positive in up to 15 (37.5%) C. glabrata bloodstream infections.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulates manufacturing and testing of advanced therapeutic medicinal products (ATMPs) to ensure the safety of each product for human use. Gold-standard sterility testing (USP<71>) and alternative blood culture systems have major limitations for the detection of fungal contaminants. In this study, we evaluated the performance of iLYM (lactic acid-fermenting organisms, yeasts, and mold) medium (designed originally for the food and beverage industry) to assess its potential for use in the biopharmaceutical field for ATMP sterility testing. We conducted a parallel evaluation of four different test systems (USP<71>, BacT/Alert, Bactec, and Sabouraud dextrose agar [SDA] culture), three different bottle media formulations (iLYM, iFA Plus, and Myco/F Lytic), and two incubation temperatures (22.5°C and 32.5 to 35°C) using a diverse set of fungi (n = 51) isolated from NIH cleanroom environments and previous product contaminants. Additionally, we evaluated the effect of agitation versus delayed-entry static preincubation on test sensitivity and time to detection (TTD). Overall, delayed entry of bottles onto the BacT/Alert or Bactec instruments (with agitation) did not improve test performance. USP<71> and SDA culture continued to significantly outperform each automated culture condition alone. However, we show, for the first time, that a closed-system, dual-bottle combination of iLYM 22.5°C and iFA Plus 32.5°C can provide high fungal sensitivity, statistically comparable to USP<71>, when tested against a diverse range of environmental fungi. Our study fills a much-needed gap in biopharmaceutical testing and offers a favorable testing algorithm that maximizes bacterial and fungal test sensitivity while minimizing risk of product contamination associated with laboratory handling.

Effective detection of microbiological contaminations present in medicinal cellular products is a crucial step to ensure patients\' safety. In recent decades, several rapid microbiological methods have been developed and validated, but variabilities linked to the use of different resources have led to discordant validation of methods and performance results. Considering this, while developing an in-house BacT/Alert-based method, we evaluated all of the materials used in its validation. Of particular importance, we noticed that the syringe gauge used to inject the samples into the bottles was crucial to obtain robust results. We chose to conduct a comparative test between the BacT/Alert system and the compendial method described in the European Pharmacopoeia, using five dilutions of nine reference microorganism strains and 21G or 27G needles. Our results confirmed that the BacT/Alert system is a valid and faster alternative method to assess sterility of clinical cell therapy products, and that the use of 27G needles increases its sensitivity to detect reference anaerobe microorganisms.

Timely diagnosis of microorganisms in blood cultures is necessary to optimize therapy. Although blood culture media and systems have evolved for decades, the standard interval for incubation prior to being discarded as negative has remained 5 days. Here, we evaluated the optimal incubation time for the BacT/Alert Virtuo blood culture detection system (bioMérieux) using FA Plus (aerobic) and FN Plus (anaerobic) resin culture bottles in routine clinical use. Following institutional review board (IRB) approval, a retrospective review evaluated the outcomes of 158,710 bottles collected between November 2018 and October 2019. The number of positive blood bottles was 13,592 (8.6%); 99% of positive aerobic and anaerobic bottles flagged positive by 91.5 and 108 h, respectively. The mean (median) times to positivity were 18.4 h (15.6 h) for Staphylococcus aureus, 12.3 h (9.5 h) for Escherichia coli, 22.2 h (15.9 h) for Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and 48.9 h (42.9 h) for Candida spp. Only 175 bottles (0.1% of all bottles) flagged positive after 4 days of incubation; 89 (51%) of these bottles grew Cutibacterium (Propionibacterium) species. Chart review of blood cultures positive after 4 days (96 h) rarely had a clinical impact and sometimes had a negative impact on patient care. Finally, a seeded study of the HACEK group (i.e., Haemophilus, Aggregatibacter, Cardiobacterium, Eikenella, and Kingella), historically associated with delayed blood culture positivity, demonstrated no benefit to extended incubation beyond 4 days. Collectively, these findings demonstrated that a 4-day incubation time was sufficient for the Virtuo system and media. Implementation of the 4-day incubation time could enhance clinically relevant results by reducing recovery of contaminants and finalizing blood cultures 1 day earlier.

The diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections and isolation of causative microorganisms has been found to be challenging in microbiology laboratories due to low sensitivity of microbiological culture. The aim of this study was to compare the use of conventional culture methods with the use of both enrichment broth and BacT/ALERT paediatric blood culture bottles, for the diagnosis of prosthetic joint infections. A total of 121 specimens from 44 patients were processed using three methods of microbiological culture: solid media, enrichment broth and paediatric bottles. The paediatric bottle method had a significantly lower (p<0.0001) time to detection than the standard solid media method, and was significantly more sensitive than solid media when used independently (93.33%, CI 83.27-98.09, vs 60.00%, CI 45.43-73.33). The combination use of solid media with paediatric bottles was found to be superior to the conventional solid media method and combination use with enrichment broth.