Baby-friendly Hospital Initiative

爱婴医院倡议
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:爱婴医院倡议(BFHI)与许多高收入国家(包括英国和美国)的母乳喂养结果改善有关。但它的有效性在法国从未被评估过。我们调查了2010年,2016年和2021年BFHI对法国产科母乳喂养率的影响,以评估BFHI是否有助于减少母乳喂养不平等。
    方法:我们检查了产科的母乳喂养(不包括,混合和任何母乳喂养)在使用2010(n=13075)的单胎足月新生儿的母亲中,2016年(n=10919)和2021年(n=10209)法国国家围产期调查。我们使用混合效应分层多项回归模型调整新生儿,母性,产科和法国行政部门的特点,并测试了某些相互作用。
    结果:在BFHI认可的产科分娩的母亲与在非认可的产科分娩的母亲相比,调整后的纯母乳喂养率高出5.8(3.4-8.1)分。与平均体重的新生儿相比,这种差异对于低出生体重的婴儿更为明显:当他们的出生体重为2500克时,则为14.9(10.0-19.9)分。在BFHI认可的医院中,混合母乳喂养降低了-1.7分(-3.2-0),根据新生儿或产妇的特征没有显着差异。
    结论:在BFHI认可的产妇单位分娩的母亲比在非认可的产妇单位分娩的母亲具有更高的纯母乳喂养率和更低的混合母乳喂养率。BFHI在低出生体重新生儿中的积极影响更强,很少母乳喂养的人,帮助缩小这一弱势群体的差距,同时有利于受过高等教育的母亲。
    BACKGROUND: The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) is associated with improved breastfeeding outcomes in many high-income countries including the UK and the USA, but its effectiveness has never been evaluated in France. We investigated the impact of the BFHI on breastfeeding rates in French maternity units in 2010, 2016 and 2021 to assess if the BFHI aids to reduce inequalities in breastfeeding.
    METHODS: We examined breastfeeding in maternity units (exclusive, mixed and any breastfeeding) in mothers of singleton full-term newborns using the 2010 (n = 13 075), 2016 (n = 10 919) and 2021 (n = 10 209) French National Perinatal Surveys. We used mixed-effect hierarchical multinomial regression models adjusting for neonatal, maternal, maternity unit and French administrative department characteristics, and tested certain interactions.
    RESULTS: The adjusted rate of exclusive breastfeeding was higher by +5.8 (3.4-8.1) points among mothers delivering in BFHI-accredited maternity units compared with those delivering in non-accredited units. When compared with average-weight newborns, this difference was sharper for infants with low birthweight: +14.9 (10.0-19.9) points when their birthweight was 2500 g. Mixed breastfeeding was lower by -1.7 points (-3.2-0) in BFHI-accredited hospitals, with no notable difference according to the neonatal or maternal characteristics.
    CONCLUSIONS: Mothers delivering in BFHI-accredited maternity units had higher exclusive breastfeeding rates and lower mixed breastfeeding rates than those delivering in non-accredited maternity units. The positive impact of the BFHI was stronger among low-birthweight neonates, who are less often breastfed, helping reduce the gap for this vulnerable group while favouring mothers with higher education levels.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:爱婴医院倡议尚未在全球广泛实施。
    背景:爱婴医院倡议的实施被认为是复杂的。挑战一直是保持认证。
    目的:探索并更深入地了解医疗保健专业人员对婴儿友好医院倡议的实施过程和维护的看法。
    方法:一项针对护士焦点组(n=10)的定性描述性研究,助产士和单位领导(n=43)对实施过程的看法采用归纳主题分析法进行分析.
    结果:对数据的分析揭示了五个主要主题:以婴儿为中心的母乳喂养背景的基础,整个过程的管理支持,促进对婴儿友好的做法,有效的沟通,确保正确的轨道,并支持BFHI名称的维护。主要主题将实施描述为爬山和到达山顶后试图保持其位置的旅程。
    结论:实施的起点是支持婴儿友好型母乳喂养实践的最佳环境。组织管理层的支持是推进实施的重要途径。对共同目标的承诺加强了对婴儿友好的方法,并通过具体和即时的反馈,确保了旅途中的正确途径。
    结论:支持实施过程的实用方法包括定期更新母乳喂养教育和持续监测,以及向卫生专业人员提供统计数据。需要关于如何维持变革的全球指导方针。这将确保所做的工作不会被浪费。
    OBJECTIVE: The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative has yet to achieve widespread global implementation.
    BACKGROUND: The implementation of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative has been recognised as complex. The challenge has been to maintain accreditation.
    OBJECTIVE: To explore and gain a deeper understanding of the healthcare professionals\' perceptions of the implementation process and the maintenance of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative.
    METHODS: A qualitative descriptive study with focus groups (n = 10) of the nurses, midwives and unit leaders (n = 43) perceptions of the implementation process were analysed using inductive thematic analysis.
    RESULTS: Analysis of the data revealed five main themes: groundwork for the baby-focused breastfeeding context, management support throughout the process, promoting baby-friendly practices, effective communication ensuring the right track, and supporting the maintenance of BFHI designation. The main themes describe the implementation as a journey of climbing a hill and after reaching the top trying to maintain their position.
    CONCLUSIONS: The starting point for implementation was an optimal environment supporting baby-friendly breastfeeding practices. The support of the management of the organisation was an important way of moving the implementation forward. Commitment to the common goal strengthened the baby-friendly approach and with concrete and immediate feedback the right pathway on a journey was ensured.
    CONCLUSIONS: Practical ways to support the implementation journey include regular update education on breastfeeding and continuous monitoring, as well as providing statistics to health professionals. Global guidelines on how to sustain change are needed. This will ensure that the work done is not wasted.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:检查美国院内纯母乳喂养(EBF)以及与婴儿友好名称和社区社会人口统计学因素的关联。
    方法:将来自2018年婴儿营养和护理孕产妇实践调查的医院数据与来自2014-2018年美国社区调查的医院邮政编码制表区(ZCTA)社会人口统计学数据相关联(n=2,024)。根据医院都市区的相对平均百分比,将医院ZCTA中的居民百分比进行二分,哪些是暴露变量(高/低黑人医院,高/低贫困医院,高/低教育程度医院)以及婴儿友好型指定。使用线性回归,我们研究了爱婴指定和医院社会人口统计学因素与院内EBF患病率之间的关联和效应测量修正.
    结果:美国平均院内EBF患病率为55.1%。与非指定医院相比,婴儿友好型指定与院内EBF患病率高9.1%点相关[95%置信区间(CI):7.0,11.2]。高黑人医院和高贫困医院与较低的EBF患病率相关(差异=-3.3;95%CI:-5.1,-1.4和-3.8;95%CI:-5.7,-1.8)。高学历医院与较高的EBF患病率相关(差异=6.7;95%CI:4.1,9.4)。爱婴指定与归因于社区贫困的院内EBF差异的显着效果度量修改相关(高贫困/爱婴指定医院比高贫困/非爱婴指定医院高4.0%)。
    OBJECTIVE: To examine US in-hospital exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) and the associations with Baby-Friendly designation and neighborhood sociodemographic factors.
    METHODS: Hospital data from the 2018 Maternity Practices in Infant Nutrition and Care survey were linked to hospital zip code tabulation area (ZCTA) sociodemographic data from the 2014-2018 American Community Survey (n = 2,024). The percentages of residents in the hospital ZCTA were dichotomized based on the relative mean percentage of the hospital\'s metropolitan area, which were exposure variables (high/low Black hospitals, high/low poverty hospitals, high/low educational attainment hospitals) along with Baby-Friendly designation. Using linear regression, we examined the associations and effect measure modification between Baby-Friendly designation and hospital sociodemographic factors with in-hospital EBF prevalence.
    RESULTS: US mean in-hospital EBF prevalence was 55.1%. Baby-Friendly designation was associated with 9.1% points higher in-hospital EBF prevalence compared to non-designated hospitals [95% confidence interval (CI): 7.0, 11.2]. High Black hospitals and high poverty hospitals were associated with lower EBF prevalence (difference= -3.3; 95% CI: -5.1, -1.4 and - 3.8; 95% CI: -5.7, -1.8). High educational attainment hospitals were associated with higher EBF prevalence (difference = 6.7; 95% CI: 4.1, 9.4). Baby-Friendly designation was associated with significant effect measure modification of the in-hospital EBF disparity attributed to neighborhood level poverty (4.0% points higher in high poverty/Baby-Friendly designated hospitals than high poverty/non-Baby-Friendly designated hospitals).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管提供了照顾,一些新生儿,完全健康的人,在最初几天表现出损害良好乳房发作的功能改变。这种情况经常导致泌乳的早期失败。我们进行了一项随机单盲对照试验,以评估四周的整骨疗法治疗是否可以使泌乳能力受损的新生儿的吸吮评分正常化。42例健康足月新生儿纳入本研究。在吸吮评分和婴儿母乳喂养技能评估的基础上,我们选择了有固有母乳喂养困难的婴儿.纳入标准为出生>37周的健康婴儿,吸痰评分≤6分,以及登记时的任何母乳。在研究结束时,整骨治疗组的吸吮评分明显高于未治疗组;治疗组的中位值吸吮评分在正常范围内,而未治疗组保持较低。在后续行动结束时,治疗组中纯母乳喂养婴儿的百分比增加了+25%.这项初步研究证明了早期整骨疗法干预在出生后最初几周缓解新生儿母乳喂养困难的有效性。
    Despite the care provided, some newborns, who are perfectly healthy, show functional alterations that impair a good breast attack in the first few days. This situation often leads to the early failure of lactation. We conducted a randomized single-blind controlled trial to evaluate whether four weeks of osteopathic treatment can normalize the sucking score in a group of neonates with impaired lactation ability. Forty-two healthy full-term neonates were enrolled in this study. On the basis of the sucking score and the assessment of the infant\'s breastfeeding skills, infants who had intrinsic breastfeeding difficulties were selected. The inclusion criteria were healthy infants born > 37 weeks, a suction score ≤ 6, and any breast milk at enrolment. At the end of the study, the sucking score was significantly greater in the osteopathic group than in the untreated group; the median sucking score in the treated group was in the normal range, while it remained lower in the untreated group. At the end of the follow-up, the percentage of exclusively breastfeeding infants in the treatment group increased by +25%. This pilot study demonstrates the efficacy of early osteopathic intervention to relieve breastfeeding difficulties in newborns in the first few weeks of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    世界卫生组织建议使用分娩妇女的自我报告评估对婴儿友好医院倡议(BFHI;步骤3-9)的关键临床实践的依从性。全球范围内,依从性主要使用医务人员报告进行评估,在某些国家,妇女自我报告的使用偏离了BFHI的全球标准。因此,我们旨在深入了解在评估BFHI步骤3-9的依从性时纳入女性自我报告的适当方法。我们开发了问题和编码算法,用于根据BFHI合规全球标准评估步骤3-9的合规性,并实施他们通过横断面调查的302名妇女谁生了一个活的婴儿在斯里兰卡医院。对步骤3-9中的每一个中的特定实践的遵守和对每个步骤的总体遵守被描述为百分比。遵守特定实践和每个BFHI步骤的范围为15.9%-100%和7.0%-100%,分别。我们的发现特别强调了评估BFHI关键临床步骤中所有特定实践的潜在增强的有用性和稳健性,而不是只关注一个步骤中的一个实践。在全球范围内获得更有用的卫生服务指导,以了解BFHI依从性及其对母乳喂养结果的影响。此方法可以全局地跨多个设置转换。这将有助于更具体地确定卫生服务所需的护理进展,以提高母乳喂养支持的有效性,并解决普遍低估和未充分利用妇女经验数据来评估和指导卫生服务改善的问题。
    The World Health Organization recommends assessing compliance with key clinical practices of the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI; Steps 3-9) using birthing women\'s self-reports. Globally, compliance is mainly assessed using health staff reports, and the use of women\'s self-reports in selected countries has deviated from the Global Standards for the BFHI. Therefore, we aimed to provide insight into the appropriate method of incorporating women\'s self-reports in assessing compliance with Steps 3-9 of the BFHI. We developed questions and coding algorithms for assessing compliance with Steps 3-9 based on Global Standards for BFHI compliance, and implemented them via a cross-sectional survey of 302 women who gave birth to a live baby in Sri Lankan hospitals. Compliance with specific practices within each of Steps 3-9 and overall compliance with each step were described as percentages. Compliance with specific practices and each BFHI Step ranged from 15.9%-100% and 7.0%-100%, respectively. Our findings particularly emphasize the potentially enhanced usefulness and robustness of assessing all specific practices within BFHI key clinical steps and not focusing only on one practice within a step, to derive more useful health service guidance globally for capturing BFHI compliance and its impact on breastfeeding outcomes. This method could be translated across multiple settings globally. It would enable more specific identification of care advancements required by health services to improve the effectiveness of breastfeeding support and address the prevailing undervaluing and under-use of women\'s experiential data to evaluate and guide health service improvement.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    爱婴医院倡议旨在通过将成功母乳喂养的十步(十步)纳入出生医院的常规母乳喂养支持来改善母乳喂养。母亲对母乳喂养支持的观点很重要,因为母亲和婴儿是这种支持的中心。
    回顾和综合现有的有关母亲对婴儿友好医院母乳喂养支持的看法和经验的文献。一个子目的是从产妇的角度描述爱婴医院和非爱婴医院在母乳喂养支持方面的差异。
    综合文献综述。2021年10月,在五个数据库中进行了系统的文献检索:PubMed,CINAHL,科克伦,Scopus,Web的科学。包括以英文发表的原始同行评审研究,探索母亲对爱婴医院母乳喂养支持的观点。两名审稿人独立筛选标题(n=914),摘要(n=226),和全文(n=47)。该综述包括17项研究,包括定量研究(n=14)和定性研究(n=3)。进行了归纳内容分析和描述性综合。
    大多数研究(n=14)从产妇的角度衡量医院对十步实践的依从性。向母亲提供了母乳喂养信息和鼓励,然而,一项定性发现表明,信息集中在母乳喂养的积极方面.尽管通常持续不超过30分钟,但母亲和婴儿之间的早期皮肤接触得到了很好的促进。母乳喂养得到了实际支持,但根据两项定性研究的结果,支持并不总是足以解决母亲的母乳喂养问题。大多数母亲在住院期间完全母乳喂养,没有向婴儿提供补充牛奶。母亲和婴儿一起住在房间里,大多被鼓励按需母乳喂养。特别是在步骤6和9中观察到婴儿友好医院与非婴儿友好医院之间的差异:在婴儿友好医院中,补充喂养和安抚奶嘴的使用不太常见。
    从母亲的角度来看,爱婴医院的母乳喂养支持主要但并非完全遵循十步措施.对“十项措施”中的一些措施的遵守率较低,这表明需要更频繁地评估母乳喂养支持做法,并考虑促进更可持续地实施该举措的战略。不管母乳喂养支持的一些缺点,母亲对医院的支持主要感到满意。爱婴医院的母亲认为,与非爱婴医院的母亲相比,母乳喂养支持更遵守“十步”。
    UNASSIGNED: The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative aims to improve breastfeeding by implementing the Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding (Ten Steps) into routine breastfeeding support in birth hospitals. Maternal perspective to breastfeeding support is important to consider as mothers and their infants are in the center of that support.
    UNASSIGNED: To review and synthesize the existing literature on maternal perceptions and experiences of breastfeeding support in Baby-Friendly hospitals. A sub-aim was to describe differences in breastfeeding support between Baby-Friendly hospitals and non-Baby-Friendly hospitals from maternal perspective.
    UNASSIGNED: An integrative literature review. A systematic literature search was conducted in October 2021 in five databases: PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane, Scopus, Web of Science. Original peer-reviewed studies published in English exploring maternal viewpoints on breastfeeding support in Baby-Friendly hospitals were included. Two reviewers independently screened the titles (n=914), abstracts (n=226), and full texts (n=47). The review comprised of seventeen studies and includes both quantitative studies (n=14) and qualitative studies (n=3). Inductive content analysis and descriptive synthesis were conducted.
    UNASSIGNED: Most studies (n=14) measured hospitals\' compliance with the Ten Steps practices from maternal perspective. Mothers were provided with breastfeeding information and encouragement, however, a qualitative finding indicated that information focused on positive aspects of breastfeeding. Early skin-to-skin contact between the mother and infant was well facilitated although often not lasting more than 30 min. Breastfeeding was facilitated by practical support but according to findings of two qualitative studies, support was not always adequate to address mothers\' problems with breastfeeding. Most mothers were exclusively breastfeeding during the hospital stay and no supplemental milk was offered to infant. Mothers were roomed-in together with their infant and were mostly encouraged to breastfeed on demand. Differences between Baby-Friendly hospitals and non-Baby-Friendly hospitals were observed particularly for steps 6 and 9: supplementary feeding and pacifier use were less common in Baby-Friendly hospitals.
    UNASSIGNED: From the maternal perspective, breastfeeding support in the Baby-Friendly hospitals was mainly but not completely in adherence with the Ten Steps practices. Low compliance with some of the Ten Steps indicates a need for a more frequent assessment of the breastfeeding support practices and consideration of strategies facilitating a more sustainable implementation of the initiative. Regardless of some shortcomings with the breastfeeding support, mothers were mainly satisfied with the support in the hospital. Mothers in the Baby-Friendly hospitals perceived that breastfeeding support was more adherent to the Ten Steps compared to mothers in non-Baby-Friendly hospitals.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们评估了匈牙利“成功母乳喂养的十个步骤”的患病率,并确定了这些步骤与母乳喂养的可能关联。我们的定量,横断面研究是在2021年在匈牙利匿名在线进行的,使用自我管理的问卷。采用目标抽样,以生物母亲身份和至少一个不超过60个月的孩子为纳入标准(n=2008)。分别分析了母乳喂养和非母乳喂养母亲的“成功母乳喂养十步”的实施情况。母乳喂养的母亲被定义为母乳喂养至少六个月。描述性统计,χ2检验,采用SPSSv25进行t检验(p<0.05)。在健康专业人员的建议下,母乳喂养和非母乳喂养的母亲之间在补充喂养方面没有显着差异(p=0.624),在母乳喂养的帮助或住院期间建议的母乳喂养位置方面(p=0.413)。工作人员接受母乳喂养友好建议的差异显著(p=0.006)。重视母乳喂养(p<0.001),1小时内皮肤与皮肤接触(p=0.002),接受补充喂养(p<0.001),入住(p<0.001),反应性喂养,识别饥饿迹象(p<0.001),安抚奶嘴/奶瓶使用(p<0.001),和母乳喂养支持的可用性(p=0.005)。在实施对婴儿友好的步骤方面,母乳喂养和非母乳喂养的子样本之间观察到显着差异(p<0.001)。母乳喂养的母亲经历了更多的婴儿友好步骤的实施和更高的母乳喂养率,而根据结果,独家母乳喂养(p=0.795)和部分母乳喂养(p=0.250)的持续时间没有显着差异。我们得出的结论是,暴露于爱婴医院倡议可能与增加6个月的母乳喂养有关,但可能不会影响更长的持续时间。
    We assessed the prevalence of the \"Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding\" in Hungary and identified possible associations of the steps with breastfeeding. Our quantitative, cross-sectional research was conducted anonymously online in Hungary with a self-administered questionnaire in 2021. Targeted sampling was used, with biological motherhood and having at least one child no older than 60 months as inclusion criteria (n = 2008). The implementation of the \"Ten Steps to Successful Breastfeeding\" was analyzed separately for breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding mothers. A breastfeeding mother was defined as breastfeeding for at least six months. Descriptive statistics, χ2 test, and t-test were calculated with SPSSv25 (p < 0.05). No significant differences were found between breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding mothers in terms of supplementary feeding at the advice of a health professional (p = 0.624) and in terms of assistance with breastfeeding or suggested breastfeeding positions during hospitalization (p = 0.413). Significant differences were found for receiving breastfeeding-friendly recommendations by staff (p = 0.006), valuing breastfeeding (p < 0.001), skin-to-skin contact within 1 h (p = 0.002), receiving supplementary feeding (p < 0.001), rooming-in (p < 0.001), responsive feeding, recognizing hunger signs (p < 0.001), pacifier/bottle use (p < 0.001), and availability of breastfeeding support (p = 0.005). Significant differences were observed between breastfeeding and non-breastfeeding subsamples regarding the implementation of baby-friendly steps (p < 0.001). Breastfeeding mothers experienced the implementation of more baby-friendly steps and a higher rate of breastfeeding, while there was no significant difference in the duration of exclusive (p = 0.795) and partial breastfeeding (p = 0.250) based on the results. We concluded that exposure to the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative may be associated with increased 6-month breastfeeding but may not influence longer durations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:这项研究的目的是确定与晚期早产儿(LPIs)成功母乳喂养相关的因素,并探索补充喂养的开始;方法:在立陶宛健康科学大学考纳斯诊所的医院对出生在胎龄340至366周的婴儿进行了前瞻性队列研究。家庭随访,直到婴儿达到12个月大。平均母乳喂养初始时间,平均母乳喂养持续时间,研究了纯母乳喂养的患病率和平均固体食物喂养开始时间.使用卡方检验计算可能影响母乳喂养率的因素之间的相关性(p<0.05);结果:在我们的222名合格参与者的研究中,我们观察到,仅在34+0+6胎龄组中,母乳喂养开始时间出现统计学显著延迟(p<0.001).出院时,36+0+6组的纯母乳喂养率明显较高(p<0.001).在第一年,母乳喂养率各不相同,纯母乳喂养的持续时间和胎龄之间没有相关性。最初的固体食物喂养时间在各组之间相似,所有婴儿都先引入蔬菜;结论:阴道分娩,出生后的皮肤接触,早期入住,出生后2小时内的母乳喂养在统计学上显着导致LPI中更早开始母乳喂养和更长的母乳喂养持续时间。所有婴儿在平均年龄为5个月时开始固体食物喂养,蔬菜是主要的食物选择。
    BACKGROUND: The aim of this study is to identify factors associated with successful breastfeeding in late preterm infants (LPIs) and explore the initiation of complementary feeding; Methods: Prospective cohort study was conducted of infants born at 34+0 to 36+6 weeks gestational age in the Hospital of the Lithuanian University of Health Sciences Kaunas Clinics during 2020-2021. Families were followed up until the infants reached 12 months of age. Average breastfeeding initial time, average breastfeeding duration time, prevalence of exclusive breastfeeding and average solid-food feeding initiation time were examined. The correlations among factors that might affect breastfeeding rates were calculated using the chi-square test (p < 0.05); Results: In our study with 222 eligible participants, we observed a statistically significant delay in breastfeeding initiation only in the 34+0+6 gestational age group (p < 0.001). At discharge, the 36+0+6 group exhibited a significantly higher exclusive breastfeeding rate (p < 0.001). Over the first year, breastfeeding rates varied, with no correlation found between duration of exclusive breastfeeding and gestational age. Initial solid-food feeding times were similar across groups, and all infants were introduced to vegetables first; Conclusions: Vaginal delivery, skin-to-skin contact after birth, early rooming-in, and breastfeeding within 2 h after birth statistically significantly causes earlier breastfeeding initiation and longer duration of breastfeeding in LPIs. All infants began solid-food feeding at an average age of 5 months, with vegetables being the primary food choice.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:量化和比较报告的婴儿友好医院倡议(BFHI)和非BFHI设施中的母乳喂养支持做法。
    方法:横断面调查。
    方法:美国各地的地区。
    方法:通过对50%BFHI和50%非BFHI设施的分层(按医院规模)随机抽样选择了二百八十六个设施(110个BFHI和176个非BFHI)。
    方法:2019年秋季至2020年春季通过电子邮件进行调查。
    方法:报告坚持成功母乳喂养的10个步骤。
    方法:具有连续性校正的Wilcoxon秩和检验,独立性的皮尔逊卡方检验,和费希尔的精确检验。
    结果:爱婴医院倡议机构更有可能报告坚持成功母乳喂养的10个步骤。报告的步骤中只有2个没有显着差异:产后立即护理和响应性喂养。
    结论:这项研究支持医院内的母乳喂养支持干预措施,因为BFHI和非BFHI设施都有改进的空间。针对非BFHI设施的干预措施是缩小母乳喂养护理差距的机会。
    OBJECTIVE: Quantify and compare reported breastfeeding support practices in the Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) and non-BFHI facilities.
    METHODS: Cross-sectional survey.
    METHODS: Regions across the US.
    METHODS: Two hundred and eighty-six facilities (110 BFHI and 176 non-BFHI) selected by a stratified (by hospital size) random sample of 50% BFHI and 50% non-BFHI facilities.
    METHODS: Emailed survey Fall 2019 through Spring 2020.
    METHODS: Reported adherence to the 10 Steps to Successful Breastfeeding.
    METHODS: Wilcoxon rank sum test with continuity correction, Pearson chi-square test of independence, and Fisher\'s exact test.
    RESULTS: Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative facilities were more likely to report adherence to the 10 Steps to Successful Breastfeeding. Only 2 of the reported steps were not significantly different: immediate postnatal care and responsive feeding.
    CONCLUSIONS: This research supports breastfeeding support interventions within hospitals as both BFHI and non-BFHI facilities have room for improvement. Interventions targeting non-BFHI facilities are an opportunity to close the disparity in breastfeeding care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:全球母乳喂养率并不理想,产后早期是开始母乳喂养的关键时期。爱婴医院倡议努力在分娩医院为母亲提供循证母乳喂养支持。这项研究检查了从爱婴指定医院出院后的第一天与母乳喂养排他性和母乳喂养困难相关的因素。还报告了母乳喂养支持的充分性和产妇对最佳支持的偏好。
    方法:在2021年5月至2022年10月之间进行了一项非实验性相关研究。在芬兰爱婴医院出院后两周内,共有80名母乳喂养的母亲完成了半结构化问卷。问卷包括人口统计和产科背景信息以及六个关于母乳喂养排他性的问题,母乳喂养困难,和母乳喂养支持。进行描述性统计分析和多元二元逻辑回归分析。
    结果:母亲的平均年龄为30.6岁(SD5.4),一半的母亲是初产妇(49%)。大多数母亲阴道分娩(85%)为足月婴儿(84%)。大多数(85%)为母乳喂养制定了一些产前计划,计划母乳喂养的中位持续时间为12个月.一半的婴儿(53%)在医院接受补充牛奶。大多数母亲(81%)在出院后完全母乳喂养。婴儿在医院接受补充牛奶的母亲非纯母乳喂养的几率增加(aOR16.5[CI95%1.7-156.7],p0.015)。大约三分之一的母亲(39%)经历过母乳喂养困难。初产母亲经历母乳喂养困难的几率增加(aOR3.41[CI95%1.2-9.8],p0.023)。在分娩医院接受足够的产后母乳喂养支持的母亲经历母乳喂养困难的几率降低(aOR0.16[CI95%0.03-0.8],p0.026)。母亲主要对母乳喂养支持感到满意,尽管出院后更及时地获得支持是首选。
    结论:充分的院内产后母乳喂养支持,包括避免非医疗补充,从更纯母乳喂养和更少母乳喂养困难的角度来看,这有助于出院后成功母乳喂养。初产母亲需要强调的支持,以减轻母乳喂养的困难。需要在出院后及时获得母乳喂养支持。
    OBJECTIVE: Global breastfeeding rates are not optimal, and the early postpartum period represents a critical time for breastfeeding initiation. The Baby-Friendly Hospital Initiative endeavours to provide mothers with evidence-based breastfeeding support in birth hospitals. This study examined factors associated with breastfeeding exclusivity and breastfeeding difficulties in the first days after being discharged from Baby-Friendly designated hospital. The adequacy of breastfeeding support and maternal preferences for optimal support were also reported.
    METHODS: A non-experimental correlational study was conducted between May 2021 and October 2022. A total of n = 80 breastfeeding mothers completed a semi-structured questionnaire within two weeks of discharge from Baby-Friendly hospital in Finland. The questionnaire included demographic and obstetric background information and six questions on breastfeeding exclusivity, breastfeeding difficulties, and breastfeeding support. Descriptive statistical analysis and multivariate binary logistic regression analysis were performed.
    RESULTS: The mean age of the mothers was 30.6 years (SD 5.4), and half of the mothers were primiparas (49 %). Most mothers gave birth vaginally (85 %) to a full-term infant (84 %). Most (85 %) had made some prenatal plans for breastfeeding, and the median planned duration of breastfeeding was 12 months. Half of the infants (53 %) received supplemental milk while in the hospital. Most mothers (81 %) were exclusively breastfeeding after hospital discharge. Mothers whose infants received supplemental milk in the hospital had an increased odds of non-exclusive breastfeeding (aOR 16.5 [CI 95 % 1.7-156.7], p 0.015). Approximately one-third of the mothers (39 %) experienced breastfeeding difficulties. Primiparous mothers had increased odds of experiencing breastfeeding difficulties (aOR 3.41 [CI 95 % 1.2-9.8], p 0.023). Mothers who received adequate postnatal breastfeeding support in birth hospital had decreased odds of experiencing breastfeeding difficulties (aOR 0.16 [CI 95 % 0.03-0.8], p 0.026). Mothers were mainly satisfied with breastfeeding support, although timelier access to support was preferred after hospital discharge.
    CONCLUSIONS: Adequate in-hospital postnatal breastfeeding support, including avoidance of non-medical supplementation, contributes to successful breastfeeding after hospital discharge in terms of more exclusive breastfeeding and fewer breastfeeding difficulties. Primiparous mothers need emphasized support to mitigate breastfeeding difficulties. Timelier access to breastfeeding support after discharge is needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号